Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 40 references

Heterodyne coherent detection of the electric field temporal trace emitted by frequency-modulated comb lasers

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper demonstrates, for the first time in the mid-infrared, direct optical sampling of the electric field emitted by free-running quantum cascade laser combs, recovering both amplitude and phase and revealing near-ideal…

desk verdict A well-executed mid-infrared heterodyne field-sampling demonstration that strengthens the FM-comb picture for QCLs; the main caveats are unquantified agreement and an uncharacterized LO spectral phase. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.18438 v1 pith:YGE7XS24 submitted 2024-12-24 physics.optics physics.ins-det

Baptiste Chomet , Salim Basceken , Djamal Gacemi , Barbara Schneider , Mathias Beck , Angela Vasanelli , Benoît Darquié , Jérôme Faist
show 1 more author
Carlo Sirtori
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.ins-det
keywords frequency-modulatedcombsquantumcascadelasersdual-combheterodynedetectionopticalsamplingmid-infraredfrequencycombstabilizationphaseretrievalharmonicmodelocking
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Mid-infrared quantum cascade laser (QCL) combs have been predicted to emit frequency-modulated (FM) fields—nearly constant amplitude with a linearly swept carrier frequency—but direct time-domain confirmation was missing. This paper reports the first optical sampling of the electric field of free-running QCL combs directly in the mid-infrared, using a low-noise femtosecond comb as a local oscillator in a dual-comb heterodyne scheme. The technique recovers both the amplitude and the phase of the QCL field as a function of time, stretched into the radio-frequency domain by a factor of about $3.6\times10^4$ so that a 50 MHz detector can record it. Applied to a fundamental comb ($f_{\mathrm{rep}}=7.4$ GHz) and a harmonic comb ($f_{\mathrm{rep}}=60$ GHz), it shows the fundamental comb to be a close-to-ideal FM source with a parabolic phase sweep and nearly constant intensity, and the harmonic comb to operate in a hybrid amplitude/frequency-modulated regime with more than 75% intensity modulation. If correct, the result gives a direct view of the mode-locking regime of these lasers and enables full stabilization of QCL combs to metrological accuracy.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is dual-comb heterodyne down-conversion with a short-pulse local oscillator. When the LO comb is ideal—linear modal phases $\phi_{\mathrm{LO},n}=n\theta$ and constant amplitude across the interaction bandwidth—the detected radio-frequency signal is a temporally stretched copy of the unknown QCL field, with the repetition rate scaled down by the detuning $\delta f = |f_{\mathrm{rep,QCL}} - k f_{\mathrm{rep,LO}}|$ (Eq. 3). This stretching, by a factor $M = f_{\mathrm{rep,QCL}}/\delta f \approx 3.6\times10^4$ here, lets a 50 MHz detector capture the field oscillations. A numerical Hilbert transform of each frame then yields the amplitude and phase quadratures of the periodic field $\xi_{\mathrm{QCL}}(t)$, and a Fourier transform over one frame period recovers the spectral amplitudes and modal phases. The load-bearing identity is the phase-curvature relation $\partial^2\varphi_{\mathrm{QCL}}/\partial\tau^2 = -2\pi \Delta f \times f_{\mathrm{rep}}$ (Eq. 4), which links the time-domain phase sweep to the spectral phase distribution and serves as the test for ideal FM behavior. The aliasing condition $N|\delta f| + \delta\nu < f_{\mathrm{rep,LO}}/2$ (Eq. 2) sets the allowed detuning for unambiguous down-conversion.

What would settle it

Measure the same QCL combs with an independent frequency-domain technique, such as SWIFTS or a dual-comb retrieval with a separately characterized reference: if the parabolic phase curvature of Eq. (4) is not reproduced for the fundamental comb, or the harmonic comb's intensity modulation depth does not reach 75%, the ideal-LO assumption is violated. Alternatively, record the heterodyne trace at a smaller detuning $\delta f$ (longer frame period) after stabilizing the comb: a change in recovered phase curvature with frame length indicates that the coherence assumption over $T = 1/\delta f$ has broken down.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that the multi-heterodyne beat between a free-running QCL comb and a low-noise femtosecond comb with linear modal phases ($\phi_{\mathrm{LO},n}=n\theta$) and flat amplitude yields a slowly varying radio-frequency replica of the QCL electric field, $S(t) = R_{\mathrm{det}} A_{\mathrm{LO}} \mathrm{Re}[ e^{i\varphi_0} e^{i2\pi \Delta f_0 t} \sqrt{I^{\delta f}_{\mathrm{QCL}}(t)} e^{i\varphi^{\delta f}_{\mathrm{QCL}}(t)} ]$, in which the QCL repetition rate is replaced by the detuning $\delta f$. From this down-converted trace, a numerical Hilbert transform recovers the time-dependent amplitude and phase of the QCL field. For the fundamental QCL comb ($f_{\mathrm{rep}}=7.4$ GHz, $f_{\mathrm{rep}}\tau_e\approx0.01$) the phase is parabolic with curvature $\partial^2\varphi_{\mathrm{QCL}}/\partial\tau^2 = -2\pi \Delta f \times f_{\mathrm{rep}}$ and the intensity is nearly constant over a round trip—the signature of an ideal FM comb. For the harmonic comb ($f_{\mathrm{rep}}=60$ GHz, $f_{\mathrm{rep}}\tau_e\approx1$) the phase sweeps the full 1.2 THz bandwidth in one 17 ps period, but the intensity modulation depth exceeds 75%, showing that the comb is not a pure FM source but a hybrid FM/AM state. The same heterodyne setup, using the LO comb as an optical reference, is then used to lock the QCL repetition rate by RF injection and the offset frequency by a phase-locked loop, yielding optical linewidths below 10 kHz and a stability of $5\times10^{-12}$ at 20 ms.

Load-bearing premise

The extraction of the QCL field assumes the local-oscillator comb has constant amplitude and linear modal phases across the interaction bandwidth, and that the free-running QCL comb remains phase-coherent over the ~5 µs down-converted frame; if either fails, the recovered phase trace is biased.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any mid-infrared comb whose field is to be characterized can be fully measured in amplitude and phase with a femtosecond LO comb and a 50 MHz detector, without electro-optic sampling.
  • The fundamental QCL comb's near-ideal FM behavior validates the active-cavity mean-field prediction of Eq. (4) and constrains models of QCL comb formation.
  • The harmonic comb's hybrid FM/AM regime, with intensity modulation above 75%, shows that the ideal FM description fails when $f_{\mathrm{rep}}\tau_e$ approaches unity, so theories must include amplitude dynamics for such devices.
  • Full stabilization of a QCL comb to a fs-comb reference—repetition rate by RF injection and offset by PLL—produces sub-10 kHz linewidths and $5\times10^{-12}$ stability at 20 ms, enabling longer down-conversion frames and metrology-grade operation.
  • Because the down-converted trace contains all comb teeth, the phase noise of every optical mode is accessible simultaneously from a single time record, not line by line.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • We infer that the same heterodyne-sampling scheme could be applied to interband cascade lasers or quantum-dot combs in the mid-infrared, where the hybrid FM/AM regime is predicted as $f_{\mathrm{rep}}\tau_e$ approaches unity; the measured intensity-modulation depth as a function of $f_{\mathrm{rep}}\tau_e$ would be a direct test of the parametric-enhancement picture.
  • We infer that because Eq. (4) is quadratic-only, the recovered time-domain phase itself is a diagnostic of non-ideal comb operation when higher-order spectral phase is present—an advantage over frequency-domain methods that average over such deviations.
  • We infer that if the LO comb were independently characterized, the same dual-comb setup could become a calibration-free field reconstructor for arbitrary mid-infrared sources, including broadband or incoherent emitters.
  • We infer that with sub-10 kHz stabilized linewidths, reducing $\delta f$ below the stabilized linewidth would allow waveform averaging over arbitrarily long frames, opening time-resolved spectroscopy with microsecond-class acquisition times per frame.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a dual-comb heterodyne technique in which a free-running mid-infrared QCL comb is beaten against a stabilized 100 MHz femtosecond-pulse local-oscillator comb, down-converting the QCL electric field and stretching it by roughly 3.6–5 × 10^4 in time. From the multi-heterodyne trace the authors retrieve the time-dependent amplitude and phase of two QCL combs—a fundamental comb at 7.4 GHz mode spacing and a harmonic comb at 60 GHz—and compare the retrieved phase curvature with the FM-comb prediction of Eq. (4). They report close-to-ideal frequency-modulated behavior for the fundamental comb, a hybrid amplitude/frequency-modulated regime for the harmonic comb with intensity modulation exceeding 75%, and they demonstrate RF-injection stabilization of the QCL comb with spectral linewidth characterization.

Significance. If the claims hold, this is the first mid-infrared optical sampling of the electric-field temporal waveform of free-running QCL combs with full phase and amplitude recovery, which would be of broad interest for comb characterization, dual-comb spectroscopy, and metrology. The comparison with Eq. (4) uses independently measured repetition rate and spectral bandwidth and does not fit free parameters, and the stabilization results provide a practical route toward fully referenced MIR combs. The main weaknesses are the uncharacterized spectral phase of the LO comb (which enters the retrieved QCL phase with a k^2 ≈ 5.5 × 10^3 leverage) and the lack of quantitative residuals or uncertainties in the claimed 'excellent agreement'; both are addressable but currently limit confidence in the central FM claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2, Eq. (3)] The retrieval of the QCL phase assumes that the LO comb has perfectly linear modal phases (φ_LO,n = nθ) and flat spectral amplitude across the interaction bandwidth, but no independent measurement of the LO spectral phase is presented in the paper. This assumption is load-bearing: because the heterodyne pairing uses k = round(f_rep,QCL / f_rep,LO) ≈ 74, a residual quadratic LO phase ψ_LO(m) = α m^2 would appear in the extracted QCL modal phase as α k^2 n^2, i.e., amplified by roughly k^2 ≈ 5.5 × 10^3. The central quantitative result—the parabolic phase curvature in Fig. 4(a) and the modal-phase comparison in Fig. 4(f)—is therefore only as good as the assumption that α is negligible. I ask the authors to provide either a characterization of the LO spectral phase (e.g., using a known phase reference or a second LO), an upper bound on α from the LO manufacturer specifications or from an independent measurement, or a consistency check at a different k value, so that the reported agreement with Eq. (4) cannot be an artifact of the reference comb.
  2. [§3, Figs. 4(a), 4(c), 4(f), 4(h)] The phrase 'excellent agreement' with Eq. (4) is not backed by quantitative metrics. The red curves in Fig. 4 appear to be drawn from Eq. (4) using the measured Δf and f_rep, but no residuals, uncertainty bands, or fitted-curvature values are given. Since the central claim is that the fundamental comb is a close-to-ideal FM comb and that the harmonic comb has more than 75% intensity modulation, the paper should quantify the agreement: for example, report the extracted phase curvature with a confidence interval and compare it with -2π Δf f_rep, and report the RMS residual between data and Eq. (4) in both the time and spectral domains. The 75% modulation depth in Fig. 4(d) also needs an uncertainty estimate.
  3. [§2 and §3] The frame-averaging procedure assumes that the QCL field is phase-coherent over the whole frame T = 1/δf ≈ 5 µs. The main text states that for this integration time the QCL linewidth is Fourier limited and refers to Supplement 1, but no quantitative verification appears in the main text. Given that the paper cites typical free-running QCL linewidths of about 0.5 MHz [26], coherence over 5 µs is not self-evident. Please include in the main text, or make explicit in the supplement, a measurement of the single-frame phase drift or the comb-tooth linewidth under the exact acquisition conditions, and state how frame averaging is affected by any residual phase noise.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§4, Fig. 5(b)] The linewidth-versus-mode-number plot in Fig. 5(b) would be more convincing with error bars on the individual linewidth estimates and a stated uncertainty on the fitted slope β; the linear-dependence claim currently rests on the visual appearance of the points.
  2. [§5] The conclusion states that the down conversion stretches the optical signal by a factor of 5 × 10^4, while §2 gives M ≈ 3.6 × 10^4 for the fundamental device with δf = 206 kHz. Please clarify which value applies to which configuration and, if appropriate, state the stretch factor for the harmonic device.
  3. [§2] The sentence 'The detuning can be farther decreased' should read 'further decreased'.
  4. [Eq. (4)] The relation between the laboratory time t, the intra-cavity time τ, and the magnification factor M is not stated explicitly where Eq. (4) is introduced; a one-sentence definition would make the comparison between the time-domain and spectral-domain phase curvature easier to follow.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central FM-behavior comparison is tested against an independent theory relation (Eq. 4) with measured inputs, and the self-citations are prior experimental milestones rather than load-bearing derivations.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that dual-comb heterodyne detection with a femtosecond LO reveals the FM temporal profile of QCL combs. The extraction of the QCL phase from the heterodyne signal follows from the stated linear-phase assumption for the LO before Eq. (3), an experimental reference characterization, not a result derived from the QCL under test. The key quantitative comparison, Figs. 4(a) and 4(f), is made against Eq. (4), which is cited to Burghoff's active-cavity mean-field theory: 'theoretical modelling [22], which predicts the phase curvature assuming constant amplitude'. The inputs to Eq. (4) are the independently measured comb bandwidth (Δf ∼ 1.2 THz) and repetition rate (frep), not parameters fit to the measured phase; therefore the agreement is an external benchmark rather than a fitted prediction. The self-citations (refs. 9, 35, 38) are used as prior work: ref. 9 motivates a limitation of SWIFTS, ref. 35 supplies a previously demonstrated phase-locking procedure, and ref. 38 appears as an application. None of these carries the central FM-regime claim. The skeptic's concern that an uncharacterized LO spectral phase would contaminate the retrieved QCL phase with k2 amplification is a legitimate systematic-error risk, but it is an assumption about the reference comb, not a case where the paper's output is identical to its input by construction. No equation in the derivation chain is defined in terms of the quantity it is used to predict, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a measurement. Hence the paper is essentially self-contained against external benchmarks, with only minor self-citation that is not load-bearing.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to produce the central claims; the phase-curvature comparison uses independently measured bandwidth and repetition rate. The main load-bearing inputs are the LO comb's ideal short-pulse phase structure, the QCL's coherence over the frame, and the flat detector response. No new entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The LO comb operates in the short-pulse regime with linear modal phases (φLO,n = nθ) and constant amplitude across the interacting bandwidth.
    Stated in Section 2 before Eq. (3); this is what allows the measured heterodyne signal to be interpreted as the QCL field replica. If the LO phases deviate, the retrieved QCL phase is biased.
  • domain assumption The free-running QCL comb is coherent over the frame period T = 1/δf (~5 µs), i.e., its linewidth is Fourier limited over that window.
    Stated in Section 2 and Supplement 1; required for the 1000-frame averaging and for the measured phase to represent the true comb waveform. Typical QCL linewidths are ~0.5 MHz, which would exceed the 200 kHz Fourier limit for 5 µs.
  • domain assumption The detector response Rdet is spectrally flat over the 50 MHz RF band and its optical bandwidth is much larger than the comb bandwidth.
    Stated in Section 2 after Eq. (3); needed so that the down-converted signal is a faithful replica without spectral shaping.
  • standard math The theoretical FM model of Burghoff (ref 22), summarized in Eq. (4), correctly predicts the phase curvature for ideal FM combs with constant amplitude.
    Used in Section 3 as the benchmark for the measured phase; the model is external and not re-derived here.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Heterodyne coherent detection of the electric field temporal trace emitted by frequency-modulated comb lasers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YGE7XS24

@misc{pith2026241218438,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Heterodyne coherent detection of the electric field temporal trace emitted by frequency-modulated comb lasers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YGE7XS24}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.18438}
}
read the original abstract

Frequency-modulated (FM) combs are produced by mode-locked lasers in which the electric field has a linearly chirped frequency and nearly constant amplitude. This regime of operation occurs naturally in certain laser systems and constitutes a valuable alternative to generate spectra with equidistant modes. Here, we use a low-noise fs-pulse comb as the local oscillator and combine dual comb heterodyne detection with time domain analysis of the multi-heterodyne signal to reveal the temporal trace of both amplitude and phase quadratures of FM comb lasers' electric field. This technique is applied to both a dense and a harmonic mid-infrared free-running quantum cascade laser frequency comb and shows direct evidence of the FM behavior together with the high degree of coherence of these sources. Our results furnish a deeper insight on the origin of the FM combs and pave the way to further improvement and optimization of these devices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.18438 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Measured unwrapped phase, 2π1 f0t + φ δ f QCL(t), of the signal S(t) [see Eq. (3)] of the fundamentally mode-locked laser as a function of time. In the top left part, the periodic contribution to the phase is also shown with a zoom ×25. This is obtained by subtracting the contribution of the center frequency 1 f0 (17.29 MHz here) from the unwrapped phase. in continuous wave operation. The first QCL investigated has … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Phase and intensity of the waveform over two cavity round-trips in the laboratory time scale Tcav,M = M × Tcav for the (a), (b) FML QCL and (c), (d) HML QCL. The phase is compared with theoretical results from Eq. (4) in red. The time is normalized to the time between two successive frames T = M × Trep. Spectra |AQCL,n | 2 and modal phases ϕQCL,n for the (e), (f ) FML QCL and (g), (h) HML QCL. The phase is compared … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Down converted spectrum in the MHz domain of the fully stabilized QCL comb operating in the FML regime with 10 Hz of resolu￾tion. The RF injected power for stabilization of the round-trip frequency is 18 dBm. (b) Linewidth of the stabilized QCL comb modes integrate…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [26]

    Intrinsic linewidth of quantum cascade laser frequency combs,

    F . Cappelli, G. Villares, S. Riedi, et al. , “Intrinsic linewidth of quantum cascade laser frequency combs,” Optica2, 836–840 (2015)

    work page 2015

  2. [1]

    Mid-infrared frequency comb based on a quantum cascade laser,

    A. Hugi, G. Villares, S. Blaser,et al., “Mid-infrared frequency comb based on a quantum cascade laser,” Nature492, 229–233 (2012)

    work page 2012

  3. [2]

    Evidence of linear chirp in mid- infrared quantum cascade lasers,

    M. Singleton, P . Jouy, M. Beck, et al., “Evidence of linear chirp in mid- infrared quantum cascade lasers,” Optica5, 948–953 (2018)

    work page 2018

  4. [3]

    Terahertz laser frequency combs,

    D. Burghoff, T.-Y . Kao, N. Han,et al., “Terahertz laser frequency combs,” Nat. Photonics 8, 462–467 (2014)

    work page 2014

  5. [4]

    In-phase and anti-phase syn- chronization in a laser frequency comb,

    J. Hillbrand, D. Auth, M. Piccardo, et al., “In-phase and anti-phase syn- chronization in a laser frequency comb,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 023901 (2020). Research Article Vol. 11, No. 9 / September 2024 / Optica 1225

    work page 2020

  6. [5]

    High performance mode locking characteristics of single section quantum dash lasers,

    R. Rosales, S. G. Murdoch, R. T. Watts,et al., “High performance mode locking characteristics of single section quantum dash lasers,” Opt. Express 20, 8649–8657 (2012)

    work page 2012

  7. [6]

    Optical pulse generation using Fabry-Pérot lasers under continuous-wave operation,

    K. Sato, “Optical pulse generation using Fabry-Pérot lasers under continuous-wave operation,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 9, 1288–1293 (2003)

    work page 2003

  8. [7]

    Frequency-modulated combs obey a variational principle,

    M. Piccardo, P . Chevalier, B. Schwarz, et al. , “Frequency-modulated combs obey a variational principle,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 253901 (2019)

    work page 2019

Show all 40 references
  1. [8]

    Evaluating the coherence and time-domain profile of quantum cascade laser frequency combs,

    D. Burghoff, Y . Yang, D. J. Hayton,et al., “Evaluating the coherence and time-domain profile of quantum cascade laser frequency combs,” Opt. Express 23, 1190–1202 (2015)

    2015

  2. [9]

    Anti-correlation phenomena in quantum cascade laser frequency combs,

    B. Chomet, T. Gabbrielli, D. Gacemi,et al., “Anti-correlation phenomena in quantum cascade laser frequency combs,” APL Photon. 8, 106106 (2023)

    2023

  3. [10]

    Self-starting harmonic fre- quency comb generation in a quantum cascade laser,

    D. Kazakov, M. Piccardo, Y . Wang, et al. , “Self-starting harmonic fre- quency comb generation in a quantum cascade laser,” Nat. Photonics 11, 789–792 (2017)

    2017

  4. [11]

    Self-starting harmonic comb emis- sion in THz quantum cascade lasers,

    A. Forrer, Y . Wang, M. Beck,et al., “Self-starting harmonic comb emis- sion in THz quantum cascade lasers,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 118, 131112 (2021)

    2021

  5. [12]

    Dissipative Kerr solitons in semiconductor ring lasers,

    B. Meng, M. Singleton, J. Hillbrand, et al., “Dissipative Kerr solitons in semiconductor ring lasers,” Nat. Photonics16, 142–147 (2022)

    2022

  6. [13]

    Mid-infrared fre- quency comb from a ring quantum cascade laser,

    B. Meng, M. Singleton, M. Shahmohammadi, et al. , “Mid-infrared fre- quency comb from a ring quantum cascade laser,” Optica 7, 162–167 (2020)

    2020

  7. [14]

    Retrieval of phase relation and emission profile of quantum cascade laser frequency combs,

    F . Cappelli, L. Consolino, G. Campo, et al., “Retrieval of phase relation and emission profile of quantum cascade laser frequency combs,” Nat. Photonics 13, 562–568 (2019)

    2019

  8. [15]

    Characterization of semiconductor-based optical frequency comb sources using general- ized multiheterodyne detection,

    A. Klee, J. Davila-Rodriguez, C. Williams, et al. , “Characterization of semiconductor-based optical frequency comb sources using general- ized multiheterodyne detection,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 19, 1100711 (2013)

    2013

  9. [16]

    Imaging soliton dynamics in optical microcavities,

    X. Yi, Q.-F . Yang, K. Y . Yang,et al., “Imaging soliton dynamics in optical microcavities,” Nat. Commun.9, 3565 (2018)

    2018

  10. [17]

    Coherent sampling of active mode-locked terahertz quantum cascade lasers and frequency synthesis,

    S. Barbieri, M. Ravaro, P . Gellie, et al. , “Coherent sampling of active mode-locked terahertz quantum cascade lasers and frequency synthesis,” Nat. Photonics5, 306–313 (2011)

    2011

  11. [18]

    Femtosecond pulses from a mid-infrared quantum cascade laser,

    P . Täschler, M. Bertrand, B. Schneider,et al., “Femtosecond pulses from a mid-infrared quantum cascade laser,” Nat. Photonics 15, 919–924 (2021)

    2021

  12. [19]

    Frequency comb spectroscopy,

    N. Picqué and T. W. Hänsch, “Frequency comb spectroscopy,” Nat. Photonics 13, 146–157 (2019)

    2019

  13. [20]

    Advances in mid-infrared spectroscopy for chemical analysis,

    J. Haas and B. Mizaikoff, “Advances in mid-infrared spectroscopy for chemical analysis,” Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem.9, 45–68 (2016)

    2016

  14. [21]

    Theory of frequency-modulated combs in lasers with spatial hole burning, dispersion, and Kerr nonlinearity,

    N. Opa ˇcak and B. Schwarz, “Theory of frequency-modulated combs in lasers with spatial hole burning, dispersion, and Kerr nonlinearity,” Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 243902 (2019)

    2019

  15. [22]

    Unraveling the origin of frequency modulated combs using active cavity mean-field theory,

    D. Burghoff, “Unraveling the origin of frequency modulated combs using active cavity mean-field theory,” Optica7, 1781–1787 (2020)

    2020

  16. [23]

    Coherent frequency combs produced by self frequency modulation in quantum cascade lasers,

    J. B. Khurgin, Y . Dikmelik, A. Hugi, et al. , “Coherent frequency combs produced by self frequency modulation in quantum cascade lasers,” Appl. Phys. Lett.104, 081118 (2014)

    2014

  17. [24]

    Single-mode instability in standing-wave lasers: the quantum cascade laser as a self-pumped parametric oscillator,

    T. S. Mansuripur, C. Vernet, P . Chevalier,et al., “Single-mode instability in standing-wave lasers: the quantum cascade laser as a self-pumped parametric oscillator,” Phys. Rev. A94, 063807 (2016)

    2016

  18. [25]

    Monolithic frequency comb platform based on interband cascade lasers and detectors,

    B. Schwarz, J. Hillbrand, M. Beiser, et al., “Monolithic frequency comb platform based on interband cascade lasers and detectors,” Optica 6, 890–895 (2019)

    2019

  19. [27]

    Spectroscopy of the methane v3 band with an accurate midinfrared coherent dual-comb spectrometer,

    E. Baumann, F . R. Giorgetta, W. C. Swann,et al., “Spectroscopy of the methane v3 band with an accurate midinfrared coherent dual-comb spectrometer,” Phys. Rev. A84, 062513 (2011)

    2011

  20. [28]

    Absolute fre- quency referencing for swept dual-comb spectroscopy with midinfrared quantum cascade lasers,

    K. N. Komagata, V. J. Wittwer, T. Südmeyer, et al. , “Absolute fre- quency referencing for swept dual-comb spectroscopy with midinfrared quantum cascade lasers,” Phys. Rev. Res.5, 013047 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    Synchronization of fre- quency combs by optical injection,

    J. Hillbrand, M. Bertrand, V. Wittwer, et al. , “Synchronization of fre- quency combs by optical injection,” Opt. Express 30, 36087–36095 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    Coherently-averaged dual comb spectrometer at 7.7 µm with master and follower quantum cascade lasers,

    K. Komagata, A. Shehzad, G. Terrasanta, et al. , “Coherently-averaged dual comb spectrometer at 7.7 µm with master and follower quantum cascade lasers,” Opt. Express29, 19126–19139 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    Coherence analysis of tightly locked mid-infrared quantum cascade laser frequency combs,

    A. Parriaux, K. N. Komagata, M. Bertrand, et al., “Coherence analysis of tightly locked mid-infrared quantum cascade laser frequency combs,” arXiv (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    High-precision methanol spectroscopy with a widely tunable SI-traceable frequency-comb-based mid-infrared QCL,

    R. Santagata, D. B. A. Tran, B. Argence, et al. , “High-precision methanol spectroscopy with a widely tunable SI-traceable frequency-comb-based mid-infrared QCL,” Optica6, 411–423 (2019)

    2019

  25. [33]

    Fully phase-stabilized quantum cascade laser frequency comb,

    L. Consolino, M. Nafa, F . Cappelli,et al., “Fully phase-stabilized quantum cascade laser frequency comb,” Nat. Commun.10, 2938 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    Absolute frequency ref- erencing in the long wave infrared using a quantum cascade laser frequency comb,

    K. N. Komagata, M. Gianella, P . Jouy, et al. , “Absolute frequency ref- erencing in the long wave infrared using a quantum cascade laser frequency comb,” Opt. Express30, 12891–12901 (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    Highly coherent phase-lock of an 8.1 µm quantum cascade laser to a turn-key mid-IR frequency comb,

    B. Chomet, D. Gacemi, O. Lopez, et al. , “Highly coherent phase-lock of an 8.1 µm quantum cascade laser to a turn-key mid-IR frequency comb,” Appl. Phys. Lett.122, 231102 (2023)

    2023

  28. [36]

    Time-resolved mid-infrared dual-comb spectroscopy,

    M. A. Abbas, Q. Pan, J. Mandon, et al. , “Time-resolved mid-infrared dual-comb spectroscopy,” Sci. Rep.9, 17247 (2019)

    2019

  29. [37]

    Field-resolved infrared spec- troscopy of biological systems,

    I. Pupeza, M. Huber, M. Trubetskov,et al., “Field-resolved infrared spec- troscopy of biological systems,” Nature577, 52–59 (2020)

    2020

  30. [38]

    Heterodyne coherent detection of phase modulation in a mid-infrared unipolar device,

    H. Dely, B. Chomet, T. Bonazzi, et al., “Heterodyne coherent detection of phase modulation in a mid-infrared unipolar device,” Opt. Express31, 30876–30883 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Ultra-sensitive hetero- dyne detection at room temperature in the atmospheric windows,

    M. Saemian, L. D. Balzo, D. Gacemi, et al. , “Ultra-sensitive hetero- dyne detection at room temperature in the atmospheric windows,” Nanophotonics 13, 1765–1772 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    Room-temperature nine-µm- wavelength photodetectors and GHz-frequency heterodyne receivers,

    D. Palaferri, Y . Todorov, A. Bigioli,et al., “Room-temperature nine-µm- wavelength photodetectors and GHz-frequency heterodyne receivers,” Nature 556, 85–88 (2018)

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.