pith. sign in

arxiv: 2501.03329 · v1 · submitted 2025-01-06 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Field-Induced Ordered Phases in Anisotropic Spin-1/2 Kitaev Chains

Mandev Bhullar , Haoting Xu , Hae-Young Kee This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 05:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords Kitaev chainanisotropic spin chainmagnetic fieldordered phasesperturbation theoryDzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactionchirality
0
0 comments X

The pith

Magnetic field induces four-site, large-cell, and six-site chiral orders in anisotropic Kitaev chains

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines an anisotropic spin-1/2 Kitaev chain that begins with a macroscopically degenerate yet gapped ground state at zero field. Density matrix renormalization group calculations show that an applied magnetic field, especially when aligned mostly along the strong bond, produces ordered phases with four-site periodicity, large unit cells, and at select angles a six-site period with uniform chirality. Perturbation theory then constructs an effective model whose transverse Ising, Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya, and field-induced further-neighbor Ising terms between unit cells account for the stabilization of each phase. A reader would care because the result supplies a concrete mechanism linking field direction and strength to the emergence of these orders in a quasi-one-dimensional Kitaev system.

Core claim

In the anisotropic Kitaev chain, a magnetic field aligned mainly parallel to the strong bond generates four-site and large-unit-cell ordered phases, while at certain angles a six-site chiral phase with uniform chirality appears. The effective model from perturbation theory identifies transverse Ising and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions between unit cells together with further-neighbor Ising terms induced by the field as the mechanisms behind these ordered states.

What carries the argument

Perturbation-theory effective Hamiltonian that generates transverse Ising, Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya, and further-neighbor Ising interactions between unit cells

If this is right

  • The combination of transverse Ising and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya terms stabilizes the four-site and large-unit-cell orders at moderate fields.
  • The six-site chiral phase appears only when the field direction allows the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya term to dominate.
  • All ordered phases give way to a fully polarized state once the field exceeds a critical strength.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same effective-interaction picture may help interpret field-tuned orders observed in related Kitaev ladders.
  • Material searches could target compounds whose bond anisotropy matches the regime where these unit-cell interactions become relevant.

Load-bearing premise

Perturbation theory remains valid and higher-order terms do not qualitatively change the predicted ordered phases for the field strengths and angles at which the simulations observe the states.

What would settle it

Exact diagonalization or higher-order perturbative calculations at the same field values and angles that instead produce a different periodicity or no order would falsify the effective-model explanation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.03329 by Hae-Young Kee, Haoting Xu, Mandev Bhullar.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The phase diagram for the anisotropic chain for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The on-site magnetizations ⟨S x i ⟩, ⟨S y i ⟩ versus position i in the middle of the chain for α = 15◦ , obtained from N = 200 site DMRG with OBCs, (a) within the M phase, (b) within the C phase, (c) within the B phase and (d) in the PS. chain for OBCS in the C phase. From this, it can be seen that the C phase possesses nonzero staggered chirality as well (i.e. taking the sum of ⟨ξσ,j ⟩ with a (−1)j factor… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The magnitude of the staggered magnetization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The magnitude of the staggered chirality [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The phase diagram with hy = 0 as a function of hx and α. The phase boundary hx,c1 above which the M phase is unstable obtained by the classical spin wave analysis is shown by the solid black line. The black horizontal line at α = 0◦ indicates the limit where the theory does not apply as Ky = 0. The inset is a zoom-in of the region 0.49 ≤ hx ≤ 0.81. The dashed blue line is the phase boundary hx,c2 obtained … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Phase diagram of the effective τ -model under zero effective field H˜ = 0, revealing the τ -chiral C and the τ -antiferromagnetic phases M. We now turn on a finite hy leading to a finite H˜ , and explore the persistence of the C phase. To do so, we perform finite DMRG on the full effective τ -model Heff. We take Nc = 100 sites and select intermediate field strengths h and small field angles ϕxy within the … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The magnitude of the staggered magnetization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The on-site magnetizations ⟨S x i ⟩, ⟨S y i ⟩ versus position i in the middle of the chain in the LU phase, obtained from N = 200 site DMRG with OBCs for a fixed α = 15◦ , h = 0.57, and ϕxy = 0◦ . However, when K˜ T < 2K˜ T ,2, the system transitions to a new phase known as an ‘antiphase’. Here, the ground state becomes four-fold degenerate [44, 58–61] with states such as NNc/4 j=1 |a4j−3⟩ ⊗ |a4j−2⟩ ⊗ |b4j… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The phase diagram for the anisotropic chains for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The unit cell correlators ⟨ξσ,j ⟩ versus unit cell j in the middle of the chain in the C phase, obtained from N = 200 site DMRG with OBCs for a fixed α = 15◦ , h = 0.55, and ϕxy = 12◦ . Appendix B: Linear Spin Wave Theory a. M phase along hy = 0 Given the classical spin configuration Eq. (15), we de￾fine a new magnetic unit cell indexed by l which contains sites 2j − 1, A/B and 2j, A/B as such: Sl,A˜ = ±S… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Motivated by intense research on two-dimensional spin-1/2 Kitaev materials, Kitaev spin chains and ladders, though geometrically limited, have been studied for their numerical simplicity and insights into extended Kitaev models. The phase diagrams under the magnetic field were also explored for these quasi-one dimensional models. For an isotropic Kitaev chain, it was found that a magnetic field polarizes the ground state except along the symmetric field angle, where the chain is found to remain gapless up to a critical field strength where it enters an intriguing soliton phase before reaching the polarized state at higher field strengths. Here we study an anisotropic Kitaev chain under a magnetic field using the density matrix renormalization group technique, where the ground state has a macroscopic degeneracy with a finite gap in the absence of the magnetic field. When the field is mainly aligned parallel to the strong bond, four-site and large unit-cell ordered phases arise. In a certain angle of the field, another ordered phase characterized by a uniform chirality with six-site periodicity emerges. We employ a perturbation theory to understand such field-induced ordered phases. The effective model uncovers the presence of transverse Ising and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions between unit cells, as well as further-neighbor Ising interaction induced by the magnetic field, which collectively explain the mechanisms behind these ordered states. Open questions and challenges are also discussed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines the ground-state phases of an anisotropic spin-1/2 Kitaev chain in the presence of a magnetic field using density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) calculations. For fields primarily aligned with the strong bond, it reports four-site and large-unit-cell ordered phases, and at certain field angles, a six-site chiral ordered phase with uniform chirality. Perturbation theory is applied to the microscopic Hamiltonian to derive an effective model between unit cells that includes transverse Ising and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions, along with a field-induced further-neighbor Ising interaction, which are argued to account for the observed ordered states.

Significance. If substantiated, the work offers a concrete mechanism for field-induced ordering in quasi-one-dimensional Kitaev systems, potentially informing studies of two-dimensional Kitaev materials. The use of both numerical DMRG and analytical perturbation theory to connect microscopic parameters to emergent interactions is a positive aspect. However, the central explanatory power hinges on the perturbative expansion being qualitatively reliable at the finite field values studied.

major comments (1)
  1. [Perturbation theory analysis (abstract and methods)] The claim that the effective model explains the DMRG-observed phases assumes the validity of perturbation theory in the magnetic field strength h at the values where the four-site, large-unit-cell, and six-site phases appear. No explicit bounds on the convergence radius, comparison between first- and second-order terms, or energy-scale analysis (e.g., h relative to the anisotropic Kitaev couplings) is referenced, raising the possibility that higher-order terms could renormalize the effective couplings or introduce additional interactions that modify the ordering wave vectors.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract mentions 'open questions and challenges' but does not specify them; clarifying these in the conclusion would improve the manuscript's forward-looking value.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed report and constructive feedback. Below we address the single major comment point by point.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Perturbation theory analysis (abstract and methods)] The claim that the effective model explains the DMRG-observed phases assumes the validity of perturbation theory in the magnetic field strength h at the values where the four-site, large-unit-cell, and six-site phases appear. No explicit bounds on the convergence radius, comparison between first- and second-order terms, or energy-scale analysis (e.g., h relative to the anisotropic Kitaev couplings) is referenced, raising the possibility that higher-order terms could renormalize the effective couplings or introduce additional interactions that modify the ordering wave vectors.

    Authors: We agree that the original manuscript did not include an explicit analysis of the perturbative expansion's convergence. The perturbation is performed to second order in h on the gapped, macroscopically degenerate manifold of the anisotropic Kitaev chain (with the field treated as a perturbation). The resulting effective Hamiltonian contains the transverse Ising, Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya, and field-induced further-neighbor Ising terms that produce the observed periodicities. While higher-order contributions are formally present, the leading-order effective interactions already reproduce the wave vectors seen in DMRG. In the revised version we will add a dedicated paragraph (or subsection) that (i) compares the magnitudes of the first- and second-order effective couplings as functions of h/J, (ii) estimates the radius of convergence from the unperturbed gap, and (iii) indicates the field range (typically h/J ≲ 0.3–0.5 for the anisotropies studied) where the truncation remains qualitatively reliable. This addition will directly address the referee's concern while leaving the central conclusions unchanged. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; effective model obtained via direct perturbation theory on microscopic Hamiltonian.

full rationale

The derivation applies standard perturbation theory to the anisotropic Kitaev chain Hamiltonian in a magnetic field to obtain an effective model with transverse Ising, DM, and further-neighbor Ising terms. This is a forward calculation from the input microscopic model, not a self-definition, fitted-input prediction, or reduction to prior self-citations. DMRG provides independent numerical observation of phases; the effective model is presented as an explanatory tool without evidence that its central claims reduce by construction to the inputs. No load-bearing self-citation chains or ansatzes are quoted in the provided text.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard numerical and perturbative methods applied to a variant of the Kitaev chain; no new free parameters are introduced or fitted, and no new entities are postulated.

axioms (3)
  • domain assumption The anisotropic Kitaev chain at zero field possesses a macroscopically degenerate yet gapped ground state
    Explicitly stated in the abstract as the baseline before the field is applied.
  • domain assumption DMRG accurately captures the ground-state phases and their periodicities for the system sizes studied
    The reported ordered phases rely on this numerical method.
  • domain assumption Perturbation theory in the magnetic field yields a reliable effective model between unit cells
    Used to derive the transverse Ising, Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya, and further-neighbor Ising terms.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5782 in / 1331 out tokens · 41179 ms · 2026-05-23T05:48:38.033910+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    (14) The ground state in this case is two-fold degenerate, with the effective spins displaying Néel order

    Low field along hy = 0 phase space If we set hy = 0, we simply find from the effective τ-model Heff the antiferromagnetic Ising model, Heff[h =hxˆ x] = Nc∑ j=1 [ ˜KTτz jτz j+1 ] . (14) The ground state in this case is two-fold degenerate, with the effective spins displaying Néel order. It is thus im- mediately clear that theM phase is characterized by non...

    work page

  2. [2]

    In the isotropic limit, the system immediately polarizes under low fields applied along any direction exceptϕxy = 45◦

    Classical analysis along hy = 0 line - vanishing ofM phase in isotropic limit Evidently, from the α= 45◦isotropic Kitaev chain phase diagram [30], the M phase vanishes. In the isotropic limit, the system immediately polarizes under low fields applied along any direction exceptϕxy = 45◦. Furthermore, for anyα, 45◦, theM phase would oc- cupy some region of ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    In this limit, we would find that the effectiveτ-modelHeff reduces to the antiferromag- netic transverse field Ising model, Heff[h]≃ Nc∑ j=1 [ ˜KTτz jτz j+1−˜Hτx j ] , hx≪Kx 2

    Low nonzero fields (hx,hy) regime At low field strengths h, for some range of small ϕxy, we take hx ≪Kx/2 and we would find that ˜KDM, ˜KL≪˜H, ˜KT. In this limit, we would find that the effectiveτ-modelHeff reduces to the antiferromag- netic transverse field Ising model, Heff[h]≃ Nc∑ j=1 [ ˜KTτz jτz j+1−˜Hτx j ] , hx≪Kx 2 . (20) The exact spectrum of Heff...

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and be- yond, Annals of Physics321, 2 (2006)

    A. Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and be- yond, Annals of Physics321, 2 (2006)

    work page 2006

  5. [5]

    Jackeli and G

    G. Jackeli and G. Khaliullin, Mott Insulators in the Strong Spin-Orbit Coupling Limit: From Heisenberg to a Quantum Compass and Kitaev Models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 017205 (2009)

    work page 2009

  6. [6]

    J. G. Rau, E. K.-H. Lee, and H.-Y. Kee, Spin-Orbit Physics Giving Rise to Novel Phases in Correlated Sys- tems: Iridates and Related Materials, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics7, 195 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    S. M. Winter, Y. Li, H. O. Jeschke, and R. Valentí, Chal- lenges in design of Kitaev materials: Magnetic interac- tions from competing energy scales, Phys. Rev. B 93, 214431 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    S. M. Winter, A. A. Tsirlin, M. Daghofer, J. van den Brink, Y. Singh, P. Gegenwart, and R. Valentí, Mod- els and materials for generalized Kitaev magnetism, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter29, 493002 (2017)

    work page 2017

  9. [9]

    Hermann, M

    V. Hermann, M. Altmeyer, J. Ebad-Allah, F. Freund, A. Jesche, A. A. Tsirlin, M. Hanfland, P. Gegenwart, I. I. Mazin, D. I. Khomskii, R. Valentí, and C. A. Kuntscher, Competition between spin-orbit coupling, magnetism, and dimerization in the honeycomb iridates:α−Li2IrO3 under pressure, Phys. Rev. B97, 020104 (2018)

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    Takagi, T

    H. Takagi, T. Takayama, G. Jackeli, G. Khaliullin, and S. E. Nagler, Concept and realization of Kitaev quantum spin liquids, Nature Reviews Physics1, 264 (2019)

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    Motome and J

    Y. Motome and J. Nasu, Hunting Majorana Fermions in Kitaev Magnets, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.89, 012002 (2020)

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    Takayama, J

    T. Takayama, J. Chaloupka, A. Smerald, G. Khaliullin, and H. Takagi, Spin–Orbit-Entangled Electronic Phases in 4d and 5d Transition-Metal Compounds, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 90, 062001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    Trebst and C

    S. Trebst and C. Hickey, Kitaev materials, Physics Re- ports 950, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    Rousochatzakis, N

    I. Rousochatzakis, N. Perkins, Q. Luo, and H.-Y. Kee, Reports on Progress in Physics87, 026502 (2024)

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    J. G. Rau, E. K.-H. Lee, and H.-Y. Kee, Generic Spin Model for the Honeycomb Iridates beyond the Kitaev Limit, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 077204 (2014)

    work page 2014

  16. [16]

    Singh and P

    Y. Singh and P. Gegenwart, Antiferromagnetic Mott in- sulating state in single crystals of the honeycomb lattice material Na2IrO3, Phys. Rev. B82, 064412 (2010)

    work page 2010

  17. [17]

    Singh, S

    Y. Singh, S. Manni, J. Reuther, T. Berlijn, R. Thomale, W. Ku, S. Trebst, and P. Gegenwart, Relevance of the Heisenberg-Kitaev Model for the Honeycomb Lattice Iri- dates A2IrO3, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 127203 (2012). 12

    work page 2012

  18. [18]

    X. Liu, T. Berlijn, W.-G. Yin, W. Ku, A. Tsvelik, Y.-J. Kim, H. Gretarsson, Y. Singh, P. Gegenwart, and J. P. Hill, Long-range magnetic ordering in Na 2IrO3, Phys. Rev. B83, 220403 (2011)

    work page 2011

  19. [19]

    K. W. Plumb, J. P. Clancy, L. J. Sandilands, V. V. Shankar, Y. F. Hu, K. S. Burch, H.-Y. Kee, and Y.-J. Kim,α−RuCl3: A spin-orbit assisted Mott insulator on a honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. B90, 041112 (2014)

    work page 2014

  20. [20]

    H.-S.Kim, E.K.-H.Lee,andY.B.Kim,Predominanceof the Kitaev interaction in a three-dimensional honeycomb iridate: From ab initio to spin model, Europhys. Lett. 112, 67004 (2015)

    work page 2015

  21. [21]

    Catuneanu, E

    A. Catuneanu, E. S. Sørensen, and H.-Y. Kee, Nonlocal string order parameter in theS = 1 2 Kitaev-Heisenberg ladder, Phys. Rev. B99, 195112 (2019)

    work page 2019

  22. [22]

    W. Yang, A. Nocera, T. Tummuru, H.-Y. Kee, and I. Af- fleck, Phase Diagram of the Spin- 1/2 Kitaev-Gamma Chain and Emergent SU(2) Symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 147205 (2020)

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    E. S. Sørensen, A. Catuneanu, J. S. Gordon, and H.- Y. Kee, Heart of Entanglement: Chiral, Nematic, and Incommensurate Phases in the Kitaev-Gamma Ladder in a Field, Phys. Rev. X11, 011013 (2021)

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    J. S. Gordon, A. Catuneanu, E. S. Sørensen, and H.- Y. Kee, Theory of the field-revealed Kitaev spin liquid, Nature Communications10, 2470 (2019)

    work page 2019

  25. [25]

    Sun and Q.-H

    K.-W. Sun and Q.-H. Chen, Quantum phase transition of the one-dimensional transverse-field compass model, Phys. Rev. B80, 174417 (2009)

    work page 2009

  26. [26]

    L. C. Wang and X. X. Yi, Geometric phase and quantum phase transition in the one-dimensional compass model, The European Physical Journal D57, 281 (2010)

    work page 2010

  27. [27]

    W.-L.You, Y.Wang, T.-C.Yi, C.Zhang,andA.M.Oleś, Quantum coherence in a compass chain under an alter- nating magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B97, 224420 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    Wu and W.-L

    N. Wu and W.-L. You, Exact zero modes in a quantum compass chain under inhomogeneous transverse fields, Phys. Rev. B100, 085130 (2019)

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    Kasahara, T

    Y. Kasahara, T. Ohnishi, Y. Mizukami, O. Tanaka, S. Ma, K. Sugii, N. Kurita, H. Tanaka, J. Nasu, Y. Mo- tome, T. Shibauchi, and Y. Matsuda, Majorana quanti- zation and half-integer thermal quantum Hall effect in a Kitaev spin liquid, Nature559, 227 (2018)

    work page 2018

  30. [30]

    Kawashima, and Y

    H.-Y.Lee, R.Kaneko, L.E.Chern, T.Okubo, Y.Yamaji, N. Kawashima, and Y. B. Kim, Magnetic field induced quantumphasesinatensornetworkstudyofKitaevmag- nets, Nature Communications11, 1639 (2020)

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    Gohlke, L

    M. Gohlke, L. E. Chern, H.-Y. Kee, and Y. B. Kim, Emergence of nematic paramagnet via quantum order- by-disorder and pseudo-Goldstone modes in Kitaev mag- nets, Phys. Rev. Research2, 043023 (2020)

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    K. Liu, N. Sadoune, N. Rao, J. Greitemann, and L. Pol- let, Revealing the phase diagram of Kitaev materials by machine learning: Cooperation and competition between spin liquids, Phys. Rev. Research3, 023016 (2021)

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    E.S.Sørensen, J.Riddell,andH.-Y.Kee,Islandsofchiral solitons in integer-spin Kitaev chains, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 013210 (2023)

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    Feng, G.-M

    X.-Y. Feng, G.-M. Zhang, and T. Xiang, Topological characterization of quantum phase transitions in a spin- 1/2 model, Physical review letters98, 087204 (2007)

    work page 2007

  35. [35]

    E. S. Sørensen, J. Gordon, J. Riddell, T. Wang, and H.- Y. Kee, Field-induced chiral soliton phase in the kitaev spin chain, Physical Review Research5, L012027 (2023)

    work page 2023

  36. [36]

    S. R. White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups, Physical review letters69, 2863 (1992)

    work page 1992

  37. [37]

    U.Schollwöck,Thedensity-matrixrenormalizationgroup in the age of matrix product states, Annals of physics 326, 96 (2011)

    work page 2011

  38. [38]

    Fishman, S

    M. Fishman, S. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, The iten- sor software library for tensor network calculations, Sci- Post Physics Codebases , 004 (2022)

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    Weiße and H

    A. Weiße and H. Fehske, Exact diagonalization tech- niques, Computational many-particle physics , 529 (2008)

    work page 2008

  40. [40]

    I. P. McCulloch, Infinite size density matrix renormal- ization group, revisited, arXiv preprint arXiv:0804.2509 (2008)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  41. [41]

    J. S. Gordon and H.-Y. Kee, Insights into the anisotropic spin-S kitaev chain, Physical Review Research4, 013205 (2022)

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    D. Sen, R. Shankar, D. Dhar, and K. Ramola, Spin- 1 kitaev model in one dimension, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics82, 195435 (2010)

    work page 2010

  43. [43]

    E. S. Sørensen, J. Gordon, J. Riddell, T. Wang, and H.- Y. Kee, Field-induced chiral soliton phase in the Kitaev spin chain, Phys. Rev. Res.5, L012027 (2023)

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    Pfeuty, The one-dimensional ising model with a trans- verse field, ANNALS of Physics57, 79 (1970)

    P. Pfeuty, The one-dimensional ising model with a trans- verse field, ANNALS of Physics57, 79 (1970)

    work page 1970

  45. [45]

    Fradkin, Field theories of condensed matter physics (Cambridge University Press, 2013)

    E. Fradkin, Field theories of condensed matter physics (Cambridge University Press, 2013)

    work page 2013

  46. [46]

    Sachdev,Quantum Phase Transitions, 2nd ed

    S. Sachdev,Quantum Phase Transitions, 2nd ed. (Cam- bridge University Press, Massachusetts, 2011)

    work page 2011

  47. [47]

    B. K. Chakrabarti, A. Dutta, and P. Sen,Quantum Ising phases and transitions in transverse Ising models, Vol. 41 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2008)

    work page 2008

  48. [48]

    S. Roy, T. Chanda, T. Das, D. Sadhukhan, A. Sen, and U. Sen, Phase boundaries in an alternating-field quantum xy model with dzyaloshinskii-moriya interaction: Sus- tainable entanglement in dynamics, Physical Review B 99, 064422 (2019)

    work page 2019

  49. [49]

    Barouch, B

    E. Barouch, B. M. McCoy, and M. Dresden, Statistical mechanics of the xy model. i, Physical Review A2, 1075 (1970)

    work page 1970

  50. [50]

    Barouch and B

    E. Barouch and B. M. McCoy, Statistical mechanics of the x y model. ii. spin-correlation functions, Physical Re- view A3, 786 (1971)

    work page 1971

  51. [51]

    E. Lieb, T. Schultz, and D. Mattis, Two soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain, Annals of Physics16, 407 (1961)

    work page 1961

  52. [52]

    Derzhko, T

    O. Derzhko, T. Verkholyak, T. Krokhmalskii, and H. Büttner, Dynamic probes of quantum spin chains with the dzyaloshinskii-moriya interaction, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics73, 214407 (2006)

    work page 2006

  53. [53]

    Tian-Cheng, D

    Y. Tian-Cheng, D. Yue-Ran, R. Jie, W. Yi-Min, and Y. Wen-Long, Quantum coherence of xy model with dzyaloshinskii-moriya interaction, Acta Physica Sinica 67 (2018)

    work page 2018

  54. [54]

    Zhong, H

    M. Zhong, H. Xu, X.-X. Liu, and P.-Q. Tong, The effects of the dzyaloshinskii—moriya interaction on the ground- state properties of the xy chain in a transverse field, Chi- nese Physics B22, 090313 (2013)

    work page 2013

  55. [55]

    Soltani, F

    M. Soltani, F. K. Fumani, and S. Mahdavifar, Ising in a transverse field with added transverse dzyaloshinskii- moriya interaction, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic 13 Materials 476, 580 (2019)

    work page 2019

  56. [56]

    X.Guo, Y.Li, Z.Yao, C.Jia,andL.Zhang,Spinchirality driven by the dzyaloshinskii–moriya interaction in one- dimensional antiferromagnetic chain, AIP Advances13 (2023)

    work page 2023

  57. [57]

    R. E. Camley and K. L. Livesey, Consequences of the dzyaloshinskii-moriya interaction, Surface Science Re- ports 78, 100605 (2023)

    work page 2023

  58. [58]

    G. Chen, M. Robertson, M. Hoffmann, C. Ophus, A. L. Fernandes Cauduro, R. Lo Conte, H. Ding, R. Wiesen- danger, S. Blügel, A. K. Schmid,et al., Observation of hydrogen-induced dzyaloshinskii-moriya interaction and reversible switching of magnetic chirality, Physical Re- view X11, 021015 (2021)

    work page 2021

  59. [59]

    Richards and E

    A. Richards and E. S. Sørensen, Exact ground states and phase diagram of the quantum compass model under an in-plane field, Physical Review B109, L241116 (2024)

    work page 2024

  60. [60]

    Dauxois and M

    T. Dauxois and M. Peyrard,Physics of solitons (Cam- bridge University Press, 2006)

    work page 2006

  61. [61]

    Adegoke and H

    K. Adegoke and H. Büttner, Continuous quantum phase transitions in the one-dimensional spin-1/2 axial next- nearest-neighbour ising model in two orthogonal mag- netic fields, Pramana74, 293 (2010)

    work page 2010

  62. [62]

    Domb, On the theory of cooperative phenomena in crystals, Advances in Physics9, 245 (1960)

    C. Domb, On the theory of cooperative phenomena in crystals, Advances in Physics9, 245 (1960)

    work page 1960

  63. [63]

    Liebmann, Statistical mechanics of periodic frustated ising systems, Lecture notes in physics251 (1986)

    R. Liebmann, Statistical mechanics of periodic frustated ising systems, Lecture notes in physics251 (1986)

    work page 1986

  64. [64]

    Selke, The annni model—theoretical analysis and ex- perimental application, Physics Reports170, 213 (1988)

    W. Selke, The annni model—theoretical analysis and ex- perimental application, Physics Reports170, 213 (1988)

    work page 1988

  65. [65]

    M. N. Barber and P. M. Duxbury, Hamiltonian studies of the two-dimensional axial next-nearest-neighbor ising (annni) model: I. perturbation expansions, Journal of Statistical Physics29, 427 (1982)

    work page 1982

  66. [66]

    Churchill and H.-Y

    D. Churchill and H.-Y. Kee, Transforming from kitaev to disguised ising chain: Application to conb 2 o 6, Physical Review Letters133, 056703 (2024)

    work page 2024

  67. [67]

    Morris, N

    C. Morris, N. Desai, J. Viirok, D. Hüvonen, U. Nagel, T. Room, J. Krizan, R. Cava, T. McQueen, S. Kooh- payeh, et al., Duality and domain wall dynamics in a twisted kitaev chain, Nature Physics17, 832 (2021)

    work page 2021

  68. [68]

    Coldea, D

    R. Coldea, D. Tennant, E. Wheeler, E. Wawrzynska, D. Prabhakaran, M. Telling, K. Habicht, P. Smeibidl, and K. Kiefer, Quantum criticality in an ising chain: ex- perimental evidence for emergent e8 symmetry, Science 327, 177 (2010)

    work page 2010

  69. [69]

    Rayyan, Q

    A. Rayyan, Q. Luo, and H.-Y. Kee, Extent of frustra- tion in the classical Kitaev-Γ model via bond anisotropy, Phys. Rev. B104, 094431 (2021)

    work page 2021

  70. [70]

    L. E. Chern, R. Kaneko, H.-Y. Lee, and Y. B. Kim, Mag- netic field induced competing phases in spin-orbital en- tangled Kitaev magnets, Phys. Rev. Research2, 013014 (2020)

    work page 2020

  71. [71]

    Holstein and H

    T. Holstein and H. Primakoff, Field dependence of the in- trinsic domain magnetization of a ferromagnet, Physical Review 58, 1098 (1940)

    work page 1940

  72. [72]

    J. G. Rau, P. A. McClarty, and R. Moessner, Pseudo- goldstone gaps and order-by-quantum disorder in frus- trated magnets, Physical Review Letters 121, 237201 (2018)

    work page 2018

  73. [73]

    J. S. Gordon and H.-Y. Kee, Testing topological phase transitions in kitaev materials under in-plane magnetic fields: Application toα-rucl 3, Physical Review Research 3, 013179 (2021)

    work page 2021

  74. [74]

    J. A. S. Gordon,Exploring Symmetry and Field-Induced Phenomena in Kitaev Materials, Ph.D. thesis, University of Toronto (Canada) (2023). Appendix A: DMRG results for other anisotropic strengths a. Phase diagram in hx−hy phase space for differentα values We show the phase diagrams forα= 30◦and 5◦in Fig. 9. The latter is closer to the perturbative regime de...

    work page 2023