Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 34 references

Exploring the non-thermal physics behind the pulsar wind nebula PSR J2030+4415 through radio observations

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper establishes that the extended radio structure detected with uGMRT at 736 and 1274 MHz behind PSR J2030+4415 is the radio counterpart of the X-ray pulsar wind nebula, with a spatially varying spectral index and restrictive radio…

desk verdict Solid two-band radio detection of a likely PWN counterpart, but the physical association is morphology-based and the re-collimation shock radius in the interpretation is off by a factor of ten. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.05284 v1 pith:Q7R5JEPX submitted 2025-01-09 astro-ph.HE

J.M. Paredes , P. Benaglia , V. Bosch-Ramon , A.Tej , A. Saha , J. Martí , P. Bordas This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords pulsarwindnebulaPSRJ2030+4415radiocontinuumspectralindexmapgamma-raybow-shockuGMRTX-rayfilament
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

PSR J2030+4415, a gamma-ray pulsar moving fast through the interstellar medium, has a well-studied X-ray nebula and a very long X-ray filament, but until now no radio counterpart had been confirmed. This paper reports new uGMRT observations at 736 and 1274 MHz that reveal an extended radio structure trailing the pulsar, overlapping the X-ray nebula and peaking about 0.045 pc behind it. The authors identify this structure as the radio counterpart of the pulsar wind nebula, and show that its spectral index $\alpha$ varies spatially, with a weighted mean of $-0.041\pm0.014$ and values from about $-0.6$ to $0.8$. The pulsar and the X-ray filament are not detected in radio, giving $3\sigma$ upper limits that support the radio-quiet classification of the pulsar and put a lower limit of a few $\times10^3$ on the Lorentz factor of particles escaping into the filament. The paper ties these observations to a physical scenario in which a re-collimation shock accelerates particles in the nebula tail and energy-dependent diffusion lets the highest-energy particles escape, and it reports a suggestive infrared cavity that may be dust swept away by the nebula.

What carries the argument

The key object is the spatially resolved spectral index map of the extended radio structure, made by imaging the two uGMRT bands to a common $6''\times6''$ beam. The map carries the identification of the radio structure as a pulsar wind nebula counterpart and constrains the particle population. The physical machinery proposed to explain the multi-wavelength picture is a re-collimation (Mach-disk) shock in the nebula tail, located roughly where the radio spectrum steepens near 20 arcsec from the pulsar; there, particle acceleration redistributes non-thermal energy towards lower energies, producing the steeper radio emission. The highest-energy particles escape the tail through energy-dependent diffusion into the surrounding magnetic field, forming the long X-ray filament while remaining too faint in radio to be detected; ordered field lines entrained and amplified by the interaction guide the outflow.

What would settle it

Take a deep 1.4 GHz image of the field with a synthesized beam of about 1 arcsecond using very long baseline interferometry or a comparable high-resolution array, and compare the morphology with the Chandra X-ray nebula: a genuine PWN radio counterpart should be an extended, non-thermal, polarized structure contained in the pulsar's momentum trail, whereas a background source would show a compact flat-spectrum core or a morphology unrelated to the X-ray emission. If the radio structure's flux density is dominated by a compact component at higher resolution, the identification fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the extended radio source detected with uGMRT, with total flux densities of $2.99\pm0.37$ mJy at 736 MHz and $3.18\pm0.41$ mJy at 1274 MHz, is the radio counterpart of the X-ray pulsar wind nebula of PSR J2030+4415. This identification rests on the positional coincidence of one end of the radio structure with the pulsar, the northward proper motion of the pulsar opposite to the radio tail, and the overlap of the 1274 MHz radio contours with the Chandra X-ray nebula. The radio tail is longer than the X-ray tail, its brightness peaks about 18 arcsec (roughly 0.045 pc) from the pulsar, and the spectral index map between the two bands shows a band-like region of steeper values down to $\alpha\simeq-0.6$, flatter or positive values ($\alpha\gtrsim0.3$--$0.5$) in the north and south, and a weighted mean of $\alpha=-0.041\pm0.014$. The pulsar and the large-scale X-ray filament remain undetected in radio, with $3\sigma$ upper limits of $96$ and $90\,\mu$Jy beam$^{-1}$ at 736 and 1274 MHz for the pulsar and $111$ and $42\,\mu$Jy beam$^{-1}$ for the filament; converting the pulsar limit to 1400 MHz with a typical radio-pulsar spectral index gives $34\,\mu$Jy, strengthening its radio-quiet classification. These radio limits, combined with the observed X-ray filament luminosity, imply that the particles escaping along the filament have a low-energy cutoff at Lorentz factor $\gamma_{\mathrm{cut}}^{\min}$ of a few $\times10^3$.

Load-bearing premise

The identification of the radio structure as the pulsar's nebula rests on its position overlapping the X-ray nebula and the pulsar's northward proper motion; if the structure is instead an unrelated background source projected along the same line of sight, the central claim fails.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • PSR J2030+4415 becomes one of the few bow-shock pulsar wind nebulae with a detected radio counterpart; the radio tail's greater length relative to X-rays indicates that lower-energy electrons radiate and survive farther downstream.
  • The radio non-detection of the pulsar, once extrapolated to 1.4 GHz, places it below the conventional radio-quiet limit and supports its classification as a radio-quiet gamma-ray pulsar.
  • The derived lower limit of a few $\times10^3$ on the cutoff Lorentz factor of filament particles means any radio counterpart of the X-ray filament must be fainter than the GMRT upper limits, explaining the radio silence of the filament.
  • The apparent 12 $\mu$m WISE cavity coincident with the PWN, if real, provides a new infrared tracer of pulsar wind interactions with dusty interstellar material.
  • The re-collimation shock and diffusive-escape scenario predicts that future polarization observations should reveal ordered magnetic fields in the radio tail and that the escaped particles may produce faint gamma-ray inverse-Compton emission.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: If the spatially varying spectral index pattern (negative central band, positive outer regions) is confirmed at higher resolution, it maps the location of the re-collimation shock and would allow direct measurement of where particle acceleration changes, which current data only constrain at the $6''$ beam scale.
  • Editorial inference: The non-detection of the filament in radio despite a 15-arcmin X-ray filament suggests that in many bow-shock pulsar wind nebulae the large-scale filaments are intrinsically radio-dark; future deep radio surveys of other such filaments may find that detections occur only when the low-energy cutoff is lower than a few $\times10^3$.
  • Editorial inference: The WISE cavity could be used as a bow-shock diagnostic independent of the synchrotron emission: measuring its size and depth as a function of wavelength would let one estimate how much interstellar material the pulsar wind has swept up, and whether the cavity advances with the pulsar's proper motion.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports uGMRT observations of PSR J2030+4415 at 736 and 1274 MHz, revealing an extended radio structure trailing the pulsar that overlaps the known X-ray pulsar wind nebula. The authors interpret this structure as the radio counterpart of the PWN, derive a spatially varying spectral index with a weighted mean of -0.041 +/- 0.014, and set 3-sigma upper limits on the pulsar and the X-ray filament. They propose a physical scenario involving a re-collimation (Mach disk) shock and energy-dependent diffusive particle escape, and they report a possible WISE 12-micron cavity coincident with the PWN.

Significance. If the radio counterpart identification is secure, this paper adds a valuable data point to the small sample of radio-detected pulsar wind nebulae around gamma-ray pulsars, and the upper limits on the pulsar and filament are useful constraints. The manuscript is based on original two-frequency GMRT observations, uses a standard reduction pipeline, and presents the radio images with multiple contour levels and a comparison to archival Chandra and WISE data. The theoretical interpretation is clearly separated from the observational results and includes testable predictions. However, the central claim of a physical association, the reported spectral-index variation, and the re-collimation shock scenario each contain weaknesses that need to be addressed before the conclusions can be fully accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.1, Fig. 3] The physical association between the extended radio source and the pulsar wind nebula is not quantitatively secured. The evidence is morphological: positional overlap with the Chandra nebula, the northward proper motion opposite the tail, and prior detections at 610 MHz and in RACS. The paper does not estimate the chance-coincidence probability of a ~3 mJy extended background source within ~18 arcseconds of the pulsar, and no compact core, polarization, or variability information is available to discriminate against an unrelated extragalactic source. Given that the radio peak is 17.7 arcseconds from the pulsar while the X-ray peak is at the pulsar, the authors should either provide a quantitative source-count-based chance-alignment estimate or present the source as a candidate radio counterpart.
  2. [§7(iii)] The distance to the proposed re-collimation shock is internally inconsistent. The text states that r_Mach = (E_dot / 4*pi*c*P_ISM)^{1/2} is approximately 2 arcseconds at 0.5 kpc, while attributing the softer radio emission at roughly 20 arcseconds to this shock. Direct evaluation with the quoted values (E_dot = 1.7e34 erg/s, P_ISM = 1 eV cm^-3) gives r_Mach of order 20-25 arcseconds, not 2 arcseconds. This order-of-magnitude discrepancy must be corrected or the parameters clearly specified, because the location of the Mach disk is the basis for associating the softer spectral region with this shock.
  3. [§5.2] The claimed significance of the spectral index variation is overstated. The reported differences of 0.5 (north) and 0.7 (south) relative to the central value are compared only to the central error e_alpha,centre ~ 0.16, but the northern and southern spectral indices have quoted errors of ~0.4 each. When the error of the difference is computed as sqrt(0.16^2 + 0.4^2) ~ 0.43, the significances become roughly 1.2 sigma and 1.6 sigma, not 3.1 sigma and 4.4 sigma. This weakens the evidence for a spatially varying spectral index, which is one of the observational pillars for the re-collimation shock interpretation.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§5.3, §8] The claim that the non-detection of the pulsar provides strong indications that PSR J2030+4415 belongs to the radio-quiet class is too strong, because the converted 3-sigma upper limit at 1400 MHz is 34 microJy, which is slightly above the 30 microJy threshold quoted from Marelli et al. (2015).
  2. [§8] In the Summary and conclusions, 'assuming a distance to the source of 0.5 pc' should read '0.5 kpc'.
  3. [Abstract and §5.1] The abstract states that the radio structure 'is the radio counterpart' while Section 8 concludes it is the 'likely radio counterpart'; these statements should be made consistent, especially given the association caveat raised above.
  4. [§5.2] The integrated flux densities at 736 MHz (2.99 mJy) and 1274 MHz (3.18 mJy) imply an integrated spectral index of about +0.11, while the pixel-weighted mean is -0.041; the paper does not discuss this apparent tension, which might arise from the different masks or from noise in the outer regions.
  5. [§6] The WISE 12-micron cavity is presented as a 'likely real ~5 sigma effect', but the significance is estimated from a single parabolic profile fit; this should be flagged as tentative and supported by additional statistics or a second independent measurement.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the radio PWN detection is an independent observational result, and the model lower limits are forward calculations with explicitly scanned parameters.

full rationale

The central claim—that the extended uGMRT emission at 736 and 1274 MHz is the radio counterpart of the X-ray PWN of PSR J2030+4415—rests on independent observational inputs: the radio images themselves, the positional overlap with the archival Chandra nebula, the pulsar's northward proper motion, and the previously catalogued 610 MHz and RACS detections. These are not outputs of the model, and the association is presented as an empirical inference rather than as a quantity derived from the theoretical scenario. The spectral index map and its weighted mean (-0.041 ± 0.014) are computed directly from the two radio bands re-imaged to a common synthesized beam; no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction. The lower limit on the escaping-particle energy (gamma_cut_min of a few x 10^3) is obtained from a forward synchrotron calculation with explicitly stated assumptions: injected power Linj = 1.5 x 10^33 erg/s, a power-law particle index of 2.2, gamma_cut_max = 10^8, a scanned BFil = 10-100 microG, and the constraint that the same injected population reproduces the observed X-ray luminosity. These assumptions are stated in situ and do not include the target result; the comparison is made against the measured GMRT upper limits, so the constraint is not forced by construction. Although the calculation is said to follow Bordas et al. (2021), a paper with overlapping authorship, the method is described transparently and is externally applicable rather than being an unverified uniqueness theorem or an ansatz smuggled in by citation. The WISE infrared cavity is presented only as a tentative consistency check and does not feed back into the radio detection. The skeptic's concern about a possible unrelated background source is a real astrophysical association risk, but it concerns the correctness of the interpretation, not circularity of the derivation chain. No equation is shown to reduce to its own input, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 11 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The radio detection itself is data-driven and requires few assumptions beyond distance and astrometric alignment. The physical interpretation and the lower limit on escaping particle energy rest on a larger set of assumed parameters, including injection power, spectral index, magnetic field values, ISM pressure, and density, which are listed above. The paper introduces no new particles, forces, or conserved quantities.

free parameters (11)
  • Distance to pulsar d = 0.5 kpc (from de Vries & Romani 2022)
    Adopted distance used to convert angular scales to physical sizes and to compute luminosities, magnetic field, and particle energies; all physical results scale with d.
  • Particle injection power L_inj = 1.5e33 erg/s = 0.1 E_dot
    Assumed power injected into particles at the base of the X-ray filament; directly scales the predicted radio flux and the derived lower limit on gamma_cut_min.
  • Injection spectral index p = 2.2
    Assumed power-law index of the injected particle distribution; affects the radio-to-X-ray flux ratio and the constraint on the low-energy cutoff.
  • Filament magnetic field B_Fil = 10 to 100 uG (scanned)
    Scanned over a range; higher fields reduce the required particle energy and radio flux. The quoted lower limit is the most conservative across this range.
  • Low-energy cutoff gamma_cut_min = 10^2 to 10^5 (scanned)
    Scanned in the model; the paper derives a lower limit of a few times 10^3 from the GMRT non-detection.
  • High-energy cutoff gamma_cut_max = 10^8 (fixed)
    Fixed high-energy end of the injection spectrum; its value is far above energies relevant for radio and X-ray emission, so it has modest influence.
  • ISM thermal pressure P_ISM = 1 eV/cm^3
    Adopted for the re-collimation shock radius and other estimates; changes in P_ISM shift the radius and the interpretation of the radio spectral softening.
  • Ambient ISM density and pulsar velocity parameters = n = 1 cm^-3, v_PSR = 3e7 cm/s, 45 degree line-of-sight angle
    Adopted for bow-shock size and magnetic field estimates in Section 7, item (i).
  • PWN magnetic field B_PWN = ~30 uG
    Assumed for synchrotron cooling time and diffusion length estimates in Section 7, item (iv).
  • IC target photon energy density = 1 eV/cm^3
    Assumed for the optimistic gamma-ray flux prediction in Section 7, item (vi).
  • Radio emitter geometry for equipartition = Cylinder 20 arcsec height and 5 arcsec radius
    Assumed volume to derive B_radio ~93 uG and minimum energy from equipartition arguments; the geometry is approximate.
assumptions (8)
  • standard math Synchrotron radiation formulas and equipartition arguments (Pacholczyk 1970) relate observed fluxes to particle energy and magnetic field.
    Used throughout Section 7 to convert particle energies and magnetic fields into observed fluxes and luminosities.
  • domain assumption Radio and X-ray emission from the tail are produced by the same leptonic population accelerated at the pulsar wind termination shock.
    Underpins the association of the radio and X-ray PWN and the broken power-law interpretation in Sections 5.1 and 7.
  • domain assumption The pulsar distance is 0.5 kpc (de Vries & Romani 2022).
    Used to convert angular to physical sizes and to compute luminosities, magnetic fields, and particle energies.
  • domain assumption The proper motion of PSR J2030+4415 is northward, so the radio structure to the south is trailing.
    Section 5.1 uses the proper-motion direction to argue the radio structure is a trailing PWN.
  • ad hoc to paper A re-collimation shock forms where the PWN interacts with ISM pressure and is responsible for the softer radio spectrum at roughly 20 arcseconds.
    Invoked in Section 7 item (iii) to explain the radio spectral softening, but the stated radius of the shock is inconsistent with the paper's own formula.
  • ad hoc to paper Energy-dependent diffusive escape, rather than synchrotron cooling alone, is the main cause of the X-ray spectral steepening along the tail.
    Section 7 item (iv) argues diffusion is faster than cooling, but this is a proposed scenario rather than an established fact.
  • ad hoc to paper The narrow X-ray filament is powered by the most energetic particles that escape along ordered ISM magnetic field lines with B ~ 10 uG.
    Section 7 item (vii) requires ordered field lines and efficient escape to produce the observed filament.
  • domain assumption The X-ray filament luminosity and the particle injection luminosity are related by the ratio of radiative cooling time to light-crossing time.
    Used in Section 7 item (vii) to estimate the required injected particle luminosity of about 10 percent of E_dot.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exploring the non-thermal physics behind the pulsar wind nebula PSR J2030+4415 through radio observations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Q7R5JEPX

@misc{pith2026250105284,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exploring the non-thermal physics behind the pulsar wind nebula PSR J2030+4415 through radio observations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Q7R5JEPX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.05284}
}
read the original abstract

PSR J2030+4415 is a gamma-ray pulsar with an X-ray pulsar wind nebula elongated along the north-south direction. The system shows a prominent X-ray filament oriented at an angle of 130{\deg} to the nebula axis. To improve our understanding of the non-thermal processes occurring in the pulsar wind nebula, we attempted to determine the possible existence of a radio counterpart, study its morphology, and obtain restrictive upper limits of the pulsar and filament emission at radio wavelengths. We performed observations of the pulsar PSR J2030+4415 and its surroundings with the upgraded Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope (uGMRT) at two frequency bands, and put the results in context with findings at other wavelengths. We obtained radio images at 736 and 1274 MHz that reveal a structure trailing the pulsar, with a morphology overlapping the X-ray nebula. This radio structure is the radio counterpart of the X-ray pulsar wind nebula. The derived spectral index along this structure shows spatial variation. There are no hints of the pulsar and the filament at any of the explored radio frequencies, but we obtained restrictive upper limits. A physical scenario that combines the radio and the X-ray observations, and consistent with IR data, of the nebula and the filament is presented. We propose that particle acceleration occurs in the nebula tail due to the presence of a re-collimation shock, and the highest energy particles gradually escape from it through energy-dependent diffusion. We also find a lower limit in the energy of the particles escaping along the X-ray filament of ~GeV.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.05284 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Archive Chandra image of the PSR J2030+4415 field in the 0.5–7 keV energy range. Image adapted from the original produced by de Vries & Romani (2022) after merging several observations (Obs. Id. 14827, 20298, 22171-22173, 23536, 24954, 24236) obtained from April 2014 to November 2021. The blue cross marks the position of PSR J2030+4415. In the image we show only a fraction (160′′) of the large-scale filament (15′ ) … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. uGMRT radio images of the PSR J2030+4415 field. The white cross in both images marks the position of the pulsar PSR J2030+4415. Left: 736 MHz image, with the synthesized beam shown in the bottom left. Overlaid are the contour levels at 3, 6, 9, and 12 times the rms noise (0.03 mJy beam−1 ). Right: 1274 MHz image, with the synthesized beam shown in the bottom left. Overlaid are the contour levels at 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Archive Chandra image of the PWN PSR J2030+4415 con￾volved to a beam of 1′′ × 1 ′′. The overlaid white contours represent the 1274 MHz radio emission from GMRT. The contour levels are 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 times the rms noise (0.015 mJy beam−1 ). The white cross marks the position of the pulsar PSR J2030+4415. dominated by the stellar content. It is known that the W3 band begins to have a significant sensitivity to ther… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Distribution of the spectral index and its error along the PWN. Left: Spectral index image of the PWN PSR J2030+4415 using the Band 4 and Band 5 data. The common synthesized beam of 6′′ × 6 ′′ is shown in the bottom left. Right: Spectral index error distribution of the…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: X-ray and radio intensity profiles of PWN PSR J2030+4415 as a function of the distance from PSR J2030+4415. The cutting line that de￾fines the profile scans crosses the pulsar position and follows the proper motion direction of the pulsar (PA= 7.2 ◦ ). The grey line co…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Environment of PSR J2030+4415 using WISE data in the mid-infrared domain. Left: PSR J2030+4415 region as seen in the 12 µm W3 band of WISE. The thin yellow line represents the 2σ contour of the GMRT 736 MHz radio emission, which matches very closely a minimum of the th…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2008, A&A, 490, L3

    Bandiera, R. 2008, A&A, 490, L3

    2008

  2. [2]

    V ., Lyutikov, M., Klingler, N., & Bordas, P

    Barkov, M. V ., Lyutikov, M., Klingler, N., & Bordas, P. 2019b, MNRAS, 485, 2041

    work page

  3. [3]

    H., Intema, H., Colazo, M

    Benaglia, P., Ishwara-Chandra, C. H., Intema, H., Colazo, M. E., & Gaikwad, M. 2020, A&A, 642, A136

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    H., Paredes, J

    Benaglia, P., Ishwara-Chandra, C. H., Paredes, J. M., et al. 2021, ApJS, 252, 17

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    & Zhang, X

    Bordas, P. & Zhang, X. 2020, A&A, 644, L4

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Bordas, P., Zhang, X., Bosch-Ramon, V ., & Paredes, J. M. 2021, A&A, 654, A4

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    & Romani, R

    Brownsberger, S. & Romani, R. W. 2014, ApJ, 784, 154

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    M., Amato, E., Petrov, A

    Bykov, A. M., Amato, E., Petrov, A. E., Krassilchtchikov, A. M., & Levenfish, K. P. 2017, Space Sci. Rev., 207, 235

    work page 2017

Show all 34 references
  1. [9]

    J., Cotton, W

    Condon, J. J., Cotton, W. D., Greisen, E. W., et al. 1998, AJ, 115, 1693 de Vries, M. & Romani, R. W. 2020, ApJ, 896, L7 de Vries, M. & Romani, R. W. 2022, ApJ, 928, 39

    1998

  2. [10]

    Dinsmore, J. T. & Romani, R. W. 2024, ApJ, 976, 4

    2024

  3. [11]

    W., Thomson, A

    Duchesne, S. W., Thomson, A. J. M., Pritchard, J., et al. 2023, PASA, 40, e034

    2023

  4. [12]

    S., et al

    Gupta, Y ., Ajithkumar, B., Kale, H. S., et al. 2017, Current Science, 113, 707

    2017

  5. [13]

    Y ., Huang, R

    Hui, C. Y ., Huang, R. H. H., Trepl, L., et al. 2012, ApJ, 747, 74

    2012

  6. [14]

    F., et al

    Jankowski, F., van Straten, W., Keane, E. F., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 473, 4436

    2018

  7. [15]

    & Ishwara-Chandra, C

    Kale, R. & Ishwara-Chandra, C. H. 2021, Experimental Astronomy, 51, 95

    2021

  8. [16]

    & Pavlov, G

    Kargaltsev, O. & Pavlov, G. G. 2008, in American Institute of Physics Confer- ence Series, V ol. 983, 40 Years of Pulsars: Millisecond Pulsars, Magnetars and More, ed. C. Bassa, Z. Wang, A. Cumming, & V . M. Kaspi, 171–185

    2008

  9. [17]

    G., Klingler, N., & Rangelov, B

    Kargaltsev, O., Pavlov, G. G., Klingler, N., & Rangelov, B. 2017, Journal of Plasma Physics, 83, 635830501

    2017

  10. [18]

    I., Churazov, E

    Khabibullin, I. I., Churazov, E. M., Bykov, A. M., Chugai, N. N., & Zinchenko, I. I. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 5683

    2024

  11. [19]

    2020, ApJ, 901, 157

    Klingler, N., Yang, H., Hare, J., et al. 2020, ApJ, 901, 157

    2020

  12. [20]

    A., Chandler, C

    Lacy, M., Baum, S. A., Chandler, C. J., et al. 2020, PASP, 132, 035001

    2020

  13. [21]

    P., De Luca, A., et al

    Marelli, M., Mignani, R. P., De Luca, A., et al. 2015, ApJ, 802, 78

    2015

  14. [22]

    P., Waters, B., Schiebel, D., Young, W., & Golap, K

    McMullin, J. P., Waters, B., Schiebel, D., Young, W., & Golap, K. 2007, in As- tronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 376, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI, ed. R. A. Shaw, F. Hill, & D. J. Bell, 127

    2007

  15. [23]

    Y ., Gaensler, B

    Ng, C. Y ., Gaensler, B. M., Chatterjee, S., & Johnston, S. 2010, ApJ, 712, 596

    2010

  16. [24]

    2024, A&A, 684, L1

    Olmi, B., Amato, E., Bandiera, R., & Blasi, P. 2024, A&A, 684, L1

    2024

  17. [25]

    Pacholczyk, A. G. 1970, Radio astrophysics. Nonthermal processes in galactic and extragalactic sources

    1970

  18. [26]

    2014, A&A, 562, A122

    Pavan, L., Bordas, P., Pühlhofer, G., et al. 2014, A&A, 562, A122

    2014

  19. [27]

    Perley, R. A. & Butler, B. J. 2017, ApJS, 230, 7

    2017

  20. [28]

    J., Guillemot, L., Allen, B., et al

    Pletsch, H. J., Guillemot, L., Allen, B., et al. 2012, ApJ, 744, 105

    2012

  21. [29]

    & Cornwell, T

    Rau, U. & Cornwell, T. J. 2011, A&A, 532, A71

    2011

  22. [30]

    J., Teuben, P

    Sault, R. J., Teuben, P. J., & Wright, M. C. H. 1995, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 77, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems IV , ed. R. A. Shaw, H. E. Payne, & J. J. E. Hayes, 433

    1995

  23. [31]

    A., Abdollahi, S., Ajello, M., et al

    Smith, D. A., Abdollahi, S., Ajello, M., et al. 2023, ApJ, 958, 191

    2023

  24. [32]

    K., et al

    Swarup, G., Ananthakrishnan, S., Kapahi, V . K., et al. 1991, Current Science, 60, 95

    1991

  25. [33]

    L., Slane, P., Morrell, N., & Kaspi, V

    Wang, Z., Kaplan, D. L., Slane, P., Morrell, N., & Kaspi, V . M. 2013, ApJ, 769, 122

    2013

  26. [34]

    L., Eisenhardt, P

    Wright, E. L., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Mainzer, A. K., et al. 2010, AJ, 140, 1868 Article number, page 8 of 8

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.