Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

A wideband amplifying and filtering reconfigurable intelligent surface for wireless relay

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A 4x8 reconfigurable intelligent surface combines in-band amplification, out-of-band filtering, and 2-bit beam steering, delivering over 20 dB energy enhancement over a lossy surface of the same size.

desk verdict A useful hardware combination of amplification, filtering, and 2-bit beam steering, but the headline 20 dB gain number rests on a mimicking baseline rather than a real passive RIS. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.09759 v1 pith:IBNCROLO submitted 2024-12-31 eess.SP physics.app-ph

Lijie Wu , Qun Yan Zhou , Jun Yan Dai , Siran Wang , Junwei Zhang , Zhen Jie Qi , Hanqing Yang , Ruizhe Jiang
show 6 more authors
Zheng Xing Wang Huidong Li Zhen Zhang Jiang Luo Qiang Cheng Tie Jun Cui
This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.SPphysics.app-ph
keywords reconfigurableintelligentsurfaceamplifyingRISfiltering2-bitphasecontrolbeamsteeringwirelessrelayfrequencyselectivitypowercombiningnetwork
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to prove that a single reconfigurable surface can act as a compact wireless relay: it receives a signal, amplifies it inside the wanted 2.8–3.2 GHz band, rejects signals outside that band, and steers the reflected beam with 2-bit phase control. The authors build and measure a 4x8 prototype and report more than 20 dB of energy enhancement relative to a lossy surface of the same size, together with sharp out-of-band rejection. The practical payoff, if the device works as claimed, is that a wireless relay could use one-tenth of the surface area and less power than a conventional reflective surface, because one shared amplifier-and-filter circuit serves eight elements through a power-combining and dividing network. A QPSK video-relay experiment supports the claimed beam steering, amplification, and frequency selectivity.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the sub-connected AF-RIS subarray architecture: eight radiating elements share one filtering and amplifying circuit through a 1-to-8 power-combining network on reception and a tapered 1-to-8 power-dividing network on transmission, while each element carries its own 0°/90° phase shifter and 0°/180° switch for 2-bit phase states. The two orthogonal slot-coupled paths convert the received polarization to a different reradiated polarization, which isolates the amplifier input from its output and prevents oscillation. This single shared circuit is what delivers amplification and filtering at a fraction of the hardware cost of per-element active RIS designs.

What would settle it

Build an otherwise identical passive surface with the amplifying and filtering circuit replaced by a plain microstrip line and measure its reflected signal strength in the 2.8–3.2 GHz band; if that measured strength differs substantially from the AF-RIS's 2 V curve, the reported 20 dB enhancement over a lossy RIS is not directly established.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's core claim is that amplification, filtering, and digital phase control can be combined in one RIS without an amplifier on every element. In each 1x8 subarray, eight slot-coupled patches feed a power-combining network, a single amplifier-and-filter chain, a power-dividing network, and eight independently switched phase shifters; orthogonal input and output polarizations keep the amplifier isolated and stable. The measured reflection amplitude in the passband is more than 20 dB above the same surface operated in a low-gain 'lossy' mode, while out-of-band amplitude falls steeply, and four phase states (0°, 90°, 180°, 270°) steer the beam to 0°, 10°, 20°, and 30°. In a software-defined-radio link test, the surface relays a QPSK signal at 3.0 GHz with 27.1 dB received SNR and suppresses 2.65 GHz and 3.35 GHz signals.

Load-bearing premise

The headline 20 dB advantage is measured against the same AF-RIS board with its amplifier voltage reduced to 2 V to imitate a lossy surface, not against a separately fabricated passive RIS, so the enhancement and the derived one-tenth-area claim depend on that proxy being representative.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A relay built on an AF-RIS can deliver the same received energy as a lossy RIS with roughly one-tenth the surface area, since received power scales with the square of array area and the surface adds more than 20 dB.
  • Sharing one filtering and amplifying circuit among eight elements reduces the number of amplifiers, filters, and the power budget compared with fully-connected amplifying RIS designs.
  • The demonstrated out-of-band rejection protects both the relay link and neighboring systems from interference that a conventional amplifying surface would otherwise amplify.
  • The 2-bit phase states preserve beam steering at 0°, 10°, 20°, and 30° while amplification and filtering are active, so coverage control and interference control do not trade off.
  • The wireless-link demonstration indicates that a compact AF-RIS can replace a larger passive RIS or a more complex relay in coverage-limited scenarios.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the one-tenth-area comparison is only as strong as the low-voltage 'lossy' proxy; if a true passive baseline measures differently, the area advantage changes accordingly.
  • Editorial inference: because the amplifier boosts in-band noise along with the signal, AF-RIS gives the largest SNR gain in coverage-limited links; in noise-limited or high-interference regimes the gain will saturate.
  • Editorial inference: the sub-connected sharing principle trades some beamforming degrees of freedom for hardware economy, so scaling to larger apertures will require multiple amplifier modules and care with oscillation.
  • Editorial inference: a direct head-to-head measurement against a separately fabricated passive RIS, using error-vector magnitude and throughput as well as SNR, would test the relay claim more stringently.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes an amplifying and filtering reconfigurable intelligent surface (AF-RIS) that combines in-band signal amplification, out-of-band filtering, and 2-bit phase-controlled beam steering. A 4x8 prototype is fabricated and characterized, and a software-defined-radio relay experiment is used to demonstrate communication improvements. The central quantitative claim is that the AF-RIS provides 'over 20 dB energy enhancement' relative to a lossy RIS of the same size, which the authors use to argue for a one-tenth-area miniaturization advantage based on the square-law area scaling of reflected power.

Significance. If the headline enhancement and filtering claims are fully supported, this is a useful hardware demonstration for active RIS research: it integrates amplification, frequency selectivity, and phase control in a single fabricated array, and the sub-connected power-combining/dividing architecture reduces the number of active components relative to per-element amplifier designs. The paper also provides direct experimental evidence of beam steering, frequency selectivity, and communication-quality improvement. However, the strength of the miniaturization and power-consumption conclusions depends on the validity of the 20 dB enhancement baseline, which is currently not established by an independent measurement of a passive lossy RIS.

major comments (3)
  1. [Results, 'Amplifying and filtering properties'; Fig. 4e-h; Discussion] The measured 'over 20 dB energy enhancement' is referenced against a proxy baseline, not a separately fabricated lossy RIS. The red dashed line in Figs. 4e-h is described as 'the reflection amplitude of the AF-RIS with the control voltage setting as 2V to mimic the amplitude of normal lossy RIS.' No measurement is shown demonstrating that the 2 V state reproduces the amplitude and frequency response of a true passive lossy RIS. Supplementary Fig. S3d reports cascaded-amplifier gain from -1.1 to 26.5 dB for control voltages of 1 to 7 V, but the gain at 2 V is not reported, so the 2 V state could still provide positive gain or a different frequency response. The only passive reference in the paper is the simulated lossy RIS element in Fig. S2d, not a measured baseline. Because the 20 dB number directly feeds the one-tenth-area miniaturization claim, this baseline should be replaced or supplemented with a direct measurement of a passive lossy RIS (or an equivalent passive structure) under the same measurement conditions, with the resulting enhancement figures reported per steering angle.
  2. [Supplementary Note S5 vs. main text (Figs. 4e-h, Discussion)] There is an internal inconsistency in the headline enhancement value. The main text states that the AF-RIS provides 'more than 20 dB energy enhancement' at 7 V control voltage for steering angles 0°, 10°, 20°, and 30°, while Supplementary Note S5 states 'more than 15 dB energy enhancement' for the same 7 V condition. Since the one-tenth-area miniaturization claim is derived from the square-law area scaling of Ref. 71, a 5 dB difference changes the required area ratio from about 10x to about 5.6x. The authors should reconcile these numbers and report the measured enhancement values (and the baseline used) explicitly.
  3. [Experimental verification; Figs. 4 and 6] No measurement uncertainty or repeatability information is provided. The amplitude responses, Q-factor/K20dB values, and SNR curves appear to be single measurements without error bars or repeated trials. Given that the paper emphasizes 'stable' filtering and 'commendable' relay performance, reporting measurement uncertainty or repeated measurements would materially strengthen the experimental claims, especially for the SNR values in Fig. 6f-g and the amplitude tuning range in Figs. 4b and 4e-h.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 2 caption and text] The caption of Fig. 2 lists panels (d)-(g) in a way that does not match the in-text references: the text refers to Fig. 2f as 'Active and passive reflection amplitude' and Fig. 2g as 'E-field intensity distributions,' while the caption assigns those labels differently. Please align the caption with the text and panel labels.
  2. [Methods, 'Measurement setup'] The sentence 'the reflection beam of the AIM array is switched to different directions' contains a typo: 'AIM' should be 'AF-RIS'.
  3. [Supplementary Note S3] The term 'Wilkson power divider' should be 'Wilkinson power divider'.
  4. [Throughout] The use of '4*8' instead of '4×8' and the inconsistent capitalization of 'rectangle coefficient' versus 'rectangular coefficient' should be made uniform.
  5. [Methods, 'Measurement setup'] The measurement is described as taking place in 'a simple anechoic environment'; given that the setup uses absorbers in an indoor environment rather than a certified anechoic chamber, it would be helpful to state the estimated measurement uncertainty or the degree of isolation achieved.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the AF-RIS claims rest on direct measurements and external scaling laws, not on self-referential derivation.

full rationale

The paper is an experimental demonstration and characterization of a fabricated AF-RIS array. Its central claims, namely in-band amplification, out-of-band filtering, 2-bit phase control, beam steering, and relay performance, are supported by direct S-parameter and SNR measurements reported in Figs. 4 and 6 and by full-wave simulations of the passive structure. The 'over 20 dB energy enhancement' is presented as a measured ratio between the AF-RIS at 7 V control voltage and a baseline; the baseline is the same AF-RIS operated at 2 V 'to mimic the amplitude of normal lossy RIS' (Fig. 4e-h), while Supplementary Note S5 states 'more than 15 dB energy enhancement' for the same 7 V condition. Whether the 2 V state faithfully reproduces a passive lossy RIS is an experimental-validity question about the reference level, not a circularity: the measured enhancement does not reduce by definition to the circuit gain, and no equation in the paper defines the claimed enhancement in terms of the baseline setting. Self-citations (e.g., Refs. 20, 22, 63, 65) appear in background and prior-art contexts only; the area-scaling miniaturization argument uses external Ref. 71, and the sub-connected energy-efficiency argument uses external Ref. 50. No load-bearing step is justified solely by a self-citation. The internal 20 dB versus 15 dB discrepancy is a consistency issue but not circular reasoning. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained against measurements and external scaling laws, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on measured device performance, calibration assumptions, and a scaling law from prior literature; no numerical parameters are fitted. The most important hidden assumption is that the low-bias AF-RIS state reproduces the behavior of a genuine lossy RIS.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The AF-RIS operated at 2 V control voltage produces a reflection amplitude representative of a true lossy RIS.
    Used as the experimental baseline for the >20 dB enhancement claim in Figs. 4e-h; no separately fabricated lossy RIS was measured.
  • domain assumption The simple anechoic environment and 5.5 m antenna-sample distance approximate free-space conditions well enough for calibrated reflection-coefficient measurements.
    Assumed in the measurement section; no chamber specification or multipath checks are provided.
  • domain assumption Received power through the RIS is proportional to the square of the RIS area, as cited from Ref. 71.
    Basis for the conclusion that 20 dB enhancement reduces the required array area by a factor of ten.
  • domain assumption The 30 dB isolation between the two ports is sufficient to prevent self-oscillation of the cascaded LEE-39+ amplifiers.
    Relied on in Supplementary Notes S1 and S2 for stable operation; oscillation margin is not measured.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A wideband amplifying and filtering reconfigurable intelligent surface for wireless relay." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IBNCROLO

@misc{pith2026250109759,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A wideband amplifying and filtering reconfigurable intelligent surface for wireless relay},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IBNCROLO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.09759}
}
read the original abstract

Programmable metasurfaces have garnered significant attention due to their exceptional ability to manipulate electromagnetic (EM) waves in real time, leading to the emergence of a prominent area in wireless communication, namely reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RISs), to control the signal propagation and coverage. However, the existing RISs usually suffer from limited operating distance and band interference, which hinder their practical applications in wireless relay and communication systems. To overcome the limitations, we propose an amplifying and filtering RIS (AF-RIS) to enhance the in-band signal energy and filter the out-of-band signal of the incident EM waves, ensuring the miniaturization of the RIS array and enabling its anti-interference ability. In addition, each AF-RIS element is equipped with a 2-bit phase control capability, further endowing the entire array with great beamforming performance. An elaborately designed 4*8 AF-RIS array is presented by integrating the power dividing and combining networks, which substantially reduces the number of amplifiers and filters, thereby reducing the hardware costs and power consumption. Experimental results showcase the powerful capabilities of AF-RIS in beam-steering, frequency selectivity, and signal amplification. Therefore, the proposed AF-RIS holds significant promise for critical applications in wireless relay systems by offering an efficient solution to improve frequency selectivity, enhance signal coverage, and reduce hardware size.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Baseband-Free End-to-End Communication System Based on Diffractive Deep Neural Network

    eess.SP 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A baseband-free end-to-end wireless system trains diffractive neural networks at both transmitter and receiver, using antenna-subarray activation as modulation and power comparison as detection.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Alsabah, M. et al. 6G Wireless Communications Networks: A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE ACCESS 9, 148191–148243 (2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    & Dai, L

    Cui, M., Wu, Z., Lu, Y., Wei, X. & Dai, L. Near-Field MIMO Communications for 6G: Fundamentals, Challenges, Potentials, and Future Directions. IEEE Commun. Mag. 61, 40–46 (2023)

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Wang, C. et al. On the Road to 6G: Visions, Requirements, Key Technologies, and Testbeds. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 25, 905–974 (2023)

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Shafie, A. et al. Terahertz Communications for 6G and Beyond Wireless Networks: Challenges, Key Advancements, and Opportunities. IEEE Netw. 37, 162–169 (2023)

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    & Han, Z

    Zhou, D., Sheng, M., Li, J. & Han, Z. Aerospace Integrated Networks Innovation for Empowering 6G: A Survey and Future Challenges. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 25, 975–1019 (2023)

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Zhang, P. et al. AI-Enabled Space-Air-Ground Integrated Networks: Management and Optimization. IEEE Netw. 38, 186–192 (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    & Munawar, H

    Qadir, Z., Le, K., Saeed, N. & Munawar, H. Towards 6G Internet of Things: Recent advances, use cases, and open challenges. ICT EXPRESS 9, 296–312 (2023). 19

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    & ul Islam, S

    Malik, U., Javed, M., Zeadally, S. & ul Islam, S. Energy-Efficient Fog Computing for 6G- Enabled Massive IoT: Recent Trends and Future Opportunities. IEEE INTERNET THINGS J. 9, 14572–14594 (2022)

    work page 2022

Show all 78 references
  1. [9]

    Nguyen, D. et al. 6G Internet of Things: A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE INTERNET THINGS J. 9, 359–383 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    Khalid, W. et al. Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface for Physical Layer Security in 6G- IoT: Designs, Issues, and Advances. IEEE INTERNET THINGS J. 11, 3599–3613 (2024)

    2024

  3. [11]

    & Jornet, J

    Akyildiz, I. & Jornet, J. Realizing Ultra-Massive MIMO (1024 x 1024) communication in the (0.06-10) Terahertz band. NANO Commun. Netw. 8, 46–54 (2016)

    2016

  4. [12]

    Liao, A. et al. Terahertz Ultra-Massive MIMO-Based Aeronautical Communications in Space-Air-Ground Integrated Networks. IEEE J. Sel. AREAS Commun. 39, 1741–1767 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    Yuan, Y. et al. A 3D Geometry-Based THz Channel Model for 6G Ultra Massive MIMO Systems. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 71, 2251–2266 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    Deng, R. et al. Reconfigurable Holographic Surfaces for Ultra-Massive MIMO in 6G: Practical Design, Optimization and Implementation. IEEE J. Sel. AREAS Commun. 41, 2367– 2379 (2023)

    2023

  7. [15]

    Zeng, S. et al. RIS-Based IMT-2030 Testbed for MmWave Multi- Stream Ultra-Massive MIMO Communications. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 31, 375–382 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    & Wittneben, A

    Rankov, B. & Wittneben, A. Spectral efficient protocols for half-duplex fading relay channels. IEEE J. Sel. AREAS Commun. 25, 379–389 (2007)

    2007

  9. [17]

    & Di Renzo, M

    Lu, W. & Di Renzo, M. Stochastic Geometry Modeling and System-Level Analysis & Optimization of Relay-Aided Downlink Cellular Networks. IEEE Trans. Commun. 63, 4063– 4085 (2015)

    2015

  10. [18]

    Rappaport, T. et al. Wireless Communications and Applications Above 100 GHz: Opportunities and Challenges for 6G and Beyond. IEEE ACCESS 7, 78729–78757 (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    Di Renzo, M. et al. Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces vs. Relaying: Differences, Similarities, and Performance Comparison. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 1, 798–807 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    J., Qi, M

    Cui, T. J., Qi, M. Q., Wan, X., Zhao, J. & Cheng, Q. Coding metamaterials, digital metamaterials and programmable metamaterials. Light Sci. Appl. 3, e218–e218 (2014)

    2014

  13. [21]

    J., Liu, S

    Cui, T. J., Liu, S. & Zhang, L. Information metamaterials and metasurfaces. J. Mater. Chem. C 5, 3644–3668 (2017). 20

    2017

  14. [22]

    Y., Zhao, J., Cheng, Q

    Dai, J. Y., Zhao, J., Cheng, Q. & Cui, T. J. Independent control of harmonic amplitudes and phases via a time-domain digital coding metasurface. Light Sci. Appl. 7, 90 (2018)

    2018

  15. [23]

    Zhang, L. et al. Transmission-Reflection-Integrated Multifunctional Coding Metasurface for Full-Space Controls of Electromagnetic Waves. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, (2018)

    2018

  16. [24]

    Zhang, L. et al. Breaking Reciprocity with Space-Time-Coding Digital Metasurfaces. Adv. Mater. 31, (2019)

    2019

  17. [25]

    Dai, J. Y. et al. Arbitrary manipulations of dual harmonics and their wave behaviors based on space-time-coding digital metasurface. Appl. Phys. Rev. 7, 041408 (2020)

    2020

  18. [26]

    Zhang, X. G. et al. Smart Doppler Cloak Operating in Broad Band and Full Polarizations. Adv. Mater. 33, (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    Wang, S. et al. Manipulations of multi-frequency waves and signals via multi-partition asynchronous space-time-coding digital metasurface. Nat. Commun. 14, (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    Liu, W. et al. Arbitrarily rotating polarization direction and manipulating phases in linear and nonlinear ways using programmable metasurface. Light Sci. Appl. 13, 172–172 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    & Zhang, R

    Wu, Q. & Zhang, R. Towards Smart and Reconfigurable Environment: Intelligent Reflecting Surface Aided Wireless Network. IEEE Commun. Mag. 58, 106–112 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    Di Renzo, M. et al. Smart Radio Environments Empowered by Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces: How It Works, State of Research, and The Road Ahead. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 38, 2450–2525 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    Liu, Y. et al. Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces: Principles and Opportunities. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 23, 1546–1577 (2021)

    2021

  24. [32]

    Basar, E. et al. Wireless Communications Through Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces. IEEE Access 7, 116753–116773 (2019)

    2019

  25. [33]

    J., Liu, S., Bai, G

    Cui, T. J., Liu, S., Bai, G. D. & Ma, Q. Direct Transmission of Digital Message via Programmable Coding Metasurface. Research 2019, 1–12 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    Dai, J. et al. Wireless Communications through a Simplified Architecture Based on Time- Domain Digital Coding Metasurface. Adv. Mater. Technol. 4, (2019)

    2019

  27. [35]

    Tang, W. et al. Wireless Communications with Programmable Metasurface: New Paradigms, Opportunities, and Challenges on Transceiver Design. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 27, 180–187 (2020). 21

    2020

  28. [36]

    Dai, J. Y. et al. Realization of Multi-Modulation Schemes for Wireless Communication by Time-Domain Digital Coding Metasurface. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 68, 1618–1627 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    Zhang, L. et al. A wireless communication scheme based on space- and frequency- division multiplexing using digital metasurfaces. Nat. Electron. 4, 218–227 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    & Cui, T

    Huang, C., Zhang, J., Cheng, Q. & Cui, T. Polarization Modulation for Wireless Communications Based on Metasurfaces. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    Chen, M. Z. et al. Accurate and broadband manipulations of harmonic amplitudes and phases to reach 256 QAM millimeter-wave wireless communications by time-domain digital coding metasurface. 9, 11 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    Liu, Y. et al. Toward Sub-Terahertz: Space-Time Coding Metasurface Transmitter for Wideband Wireless Communications. Adv. Sci. 10, (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    & Alexandropoulos, G

    Yildirim, I., Kilinc, F., Basar, E. & Alexandropoulos, G. Hybrid RIS-Empowered Reflection and Decode-and-Forward Relaying for Coverage Extension. IEEE Commun. Lett. 25, 1692–1696 (2021)

    2021

  34. [42]

    & Poor, H

    Kan, T., Chang, R., Chien, F., Chen, B. & Poor, H. Hybrid Relay and Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface Assisted Multiuser MISO Systems. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 72, 7653–7668 (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    & Poor, H

    Cheng, Y., Li, K., Liu, Y., Teh, K. & Poor, H. Downlink and Uplink Intelligent Reflecting Surface Aided Networks: NOMA and OMA. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 20, 3988– 4000 (2021)

    2021

  36. [44]

    & Eltawil, A

    Arzykulov, S., Nauryzbayev, G., Celik, A. & Eltawil, A. RIS-Assisted Full-Duplex Relay Systems. IEEE Syst. J. 16, 5729–5740 (2022)

    2022

  37. [45]

    & Zhang, W

    Wang, W. & Zhang, W. Joint Beam Training and Positioning for Intelligent Reflecting Surfaces Assisted Millimeter Wave Communications. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 20, 6282– 6297 (2021)

    2021

  38. [46]

    & Wang, X

    Wang, J., Liang, Y., Joung, J., Yuan, X. & Wang, X. Joint Beamforming and Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface Design for Two-Way Relay Networks. IEEE Trans. Commun. 69, 5620–5633 (2021). 22

    2021

  39. [47]

    & Chaaban, A

    Obeed, M. & Chaaban, A. Joint Beamforming Design for Multiuser MISO Downlink Aided by a Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface and a Relay. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 21, 8216–8229 (2022)

    2022

  40. [48]

    WEF_Top_10_Emerging_Technologies_of_2024, 25 June 2024, [online] Available: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Top_10_Emerging_Technologies_of_2024.pdf

    2024

  41. [49]

    & Liu, Q

    Ma, Y., Li, M., Liu, Y., Wu, Q. & Liu, Q. Optimization for Reflection and Transmission Dual-Functional Active RIS-Assisted Systems. IEEE Trans. Commun. 71, 5534–5548 (2023)

    2023

  42. [50]

    & Yang, F

    Liu, K., Zhang, Z., Dai, L., Xu, S. & Yang, F. Active Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface: Fully-Connected or Sub-Connected? IEEE Commun. Lett. 26, 167–171 (2022)

    2022

  43. [51]

    & Larsson, E

    Long, R., Liang, Y.-C., Pei, Y. & Larsson, E. G. Active Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface-Aided Wireless Communications. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 20, 14 (2021)

    2021

  44. [52]

    & Liu, Q

    Ma, Y., Li, M., Liu, Y., Wu, Q. & Liu, Q. Active Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface for Energy Efficiency in MU-MISO Systems. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 72, 4103–4107 (2023)

    2023

  45. [53]

    Zhang, Z. et al. Active RIS vs. Passive RIS: Which Will Prevail in 6G? IEEE Trans. Commun. 71, 1707–1725 (2023)

    2023

  46. [54]

    & Song, H

    Bialkowski, M., Robinson, A. & Song, H. Design, development, and testing of X-band amplifying reflectarrays. IEEE Trans. ANTENNAS Propag. 50, 1065–1076 (2002)

    2002

  47. [55]

    & Hum, S

    Kishor, K. & Hum, S. An Amplifying Reconfigurable Reflectarray Antenna. IEEE Trans. ANTENNAS Propag. 60, 197–205 (2012)

    2012

  48. [56]

    Yang, X. et al. A Distributed Power-Amplifying Reflectarray Antenna for EIRP Boost Applications. IEEE ANTENNAS Wirel. Propag. Lett. 16, 2742–2745 (2017)

    2017

  49. [57]

    Wang, X. et al. Amplification and Manipulation of Nonlinear Electromagnetic Waves and Enhanced Nonreciprocity using Transmissive Space‐Time‐Coding Metasurface. Adv. Sci. 9, 2105960 (2022)

    2022

  50. [58]

    Ma, Q. et al. Controllable and Programmable Nonreciprocity Based on Detachable Digital Coding Metasurface. Adv. Opt. Mater. 7, 1901285 (2019)

    2019

  51. [59]

    & Caloz, C

    Taravati, S., Khan, B., Gupta, S., Achouri, K. & Caloz, C. Nonreciprocal Nongyrotropic Magnetless Metasurface. IEEE Trans. ANTENNAS Propag. 65, 3589–3597 (2017)

    2017

  52. [60]

    Qiu, T., Jia, Y., Wang, J., Cheng, Q. & Qu, S. Controllable Reflection-Enhancement Metasurfaces via Amplification Excitation of Transistor Circuit. IEEE Trans. ANTENNAS Propag. 69, 1477–1482 (2021). 23

    2021

  53. [61]

    & Eleftheriades, G

    Taravati, S. & Eleftheriades, G. Full-duplex reflective beamsteering metasurface featuring magnetless nonreciprocal amplification. Nat. Commun. 12, (2021)

    2021

  54. [62]

    Yang, J. et al. Active polarization-converting metasurface with electrically controlled magnitude amplification. Opt. Express 31, 28979 (2023)

    2023

  55. [63]

    Wu, L. et al. A Wideband Amplifying Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 70, 10623–10631 (2022)

    2022

  56. [64]

    Wang, H. et al. High-Efficiency Spatial-Wave Frequency Multiplication Using Strongly Nonlinear Metasurface. Adv. Sci. 8, (2021)

    2021

  57. [65]

    Wang, X. et al. High-performance cost efficient simultaneous wireless information and power transfers deploying jointly modulated amplifying programmable metasurface. Nat. Commun. 14, 6002 (2023)

    2023

  58. [66]

    Liu, C. et al. A programmable diffractive deep neural network based on a digital-coding metasurface array. Nat. Electron. 5, 113–122 (2022)

    2022

  59. [67]

    Zhao, Y. & Lv, X. Network Coexistence Analysis of RIS-Assisted Wireless Communications. IEEE ACCESS 10, 63442–63454 (2022)

    2022

  60. [68]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for 6G: applications, challenges, and solutions

    Zhao, Y. Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for 6G: applications, challenges, and solutions. Front. Inf. Technol. Electron. Eng. 24, 1669–1688 (2023)

    2023

  61. [69]

    Liang, J. C. et al. A filtering reconfigurable intelligent surface for interference-free wireless communications. Nat. Commun. 15, 3838 (2024)

    2024

  62. [70]

    & Zhang, X

    Hu, Q., Yang, H., Zeng, X., Rao, Y. & Zhang, X. Methodology and Design of Absorptive Filtering Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces. IEEE Trans. ANTENNAS Propag. 72, 5301–5306 (2024)

    2024

  63. [71]

    Tang, W. et al. Wireless Communications With Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface: Path Loss Modeling and Experimental Measurement. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 20, 421–439 (2021). 24 Supplementary Information for A wideband amplifying and filtering reconfigurable intelligent surf...

    2021

  64. [72]

    State Key Laboratory of Millimeter Waves, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China

  65. [73]

    Institute of Electromagnetic Space, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China

  66. [74]

    Frontiers Science Center for Mobile Information Communication and Security, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China

  67. [75]

    State Key Laboratory of Terahertz and Millimeter Waves, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

  68. [76]

    Suzhou Laboratory, Suzhou 215000, China

  69. [77]

    School of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China

  70. [78]

    School of Electronics and Information, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, 310018, China †Equally contributed to this work *E-mail: junyand@seu.edu.cn; qiangcheng@seu.edu.cn; tjcui@seu.edu.cn 25 Supplementary Note S1: Design and performance of the AF-RIS element The detailed...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.