REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 40 references
Dichroism of coupled multipolar plasmonic modes in twisted triskelion stacks
T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read Twisted stacks of gold triskelia show that circular dichroism arises from multipolar modes whose phase difference changes with twist angle, not from the standard Born–Kuhn dipole picture.
desk verdict Credible tunable-CD experiment in twisted triskelia, but the headline mode-dephasing story rests on ill-defined phase snapshots and the lattice claim is oversold in the abstract. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The central objects are the triskelion (a planar gold motif of three arms bent 120° at their midpoints, giving 3D chirality and threefold rotational symmetry) and the twisted stack (two parallel triskelia, centrally aligned, separated by ~30 nm, with twist angle α). The threefold symmetry suppresses modes with an even number of poles, forcing the excitations to be multipolar and geometrically frustrated. The argument is carried by the relative phase between the two triskelia's induced dipole moments, computed by FDTD, which shows a continuous shift from anti-phase at α ≈ 0° to in-phase near α ≈ 60° for the low-energy mode; this angle-dependent dephasing is the mechanism proposed to govern the circular dichroism. In the lattice case, the mechanism is the hybridization of a surface lattice resonance with the anti-phase stack mode, producing a sharp handedness-switchable Fano peak.
What would settle it
Re-run the FDTD analysis with a fixed, physically defined phase reference (e.g., the phase of the incident field at the stack center) and check whether the relative angle between the two monomers' induced dipole moments still evolves from anti-phase at small α to in-phase near 60°. If the trend disappears or changes when the phase reference is fixed, the central mechanism is an artifact of snapshot choice.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
In a twisted stack of two identical gold triskelia separated by about 30 nm, the two near-infrared plasmonic modes respond to circularly polarized light in a way that depends strongly on the twist angle α. The high-energy mode is an in-phase excitation of the two triskelia under both handednesses. The low-energy mode, which is strongly excited only by light of opposite handedness to the stack, corresponds to multipolar excitations whose instantaneous polarizations have a phase difference that varies with α. The paper demonstrates, using FDTD-computed dipole moments and charge snapshots, that anti-phase oscillations between the two monomers occur only at small twist angles; for angles greater than about 15° the polarizations progressively align in phase as α approaches 60°. This behaviour contradicts the simple Born–Kuhn picture and the standard in-phase/anti-phase hybridization picture of two interacting dipoles, and explains the large circular dichroism in extinction as handedness-selective excitation of an out-of-phase mode with poor scattering.
Load-bearing premise
The load-bearing premise is that the relative phase between the two triskelia's polarizations, as extracted from simulated dipole moments and charge snapshots, is a faithful representation of the physical mode symmetry; if the simulation's phase reference or multipole decomposition is not physically faithful, the claimed angle-dependent dephasing collapses.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- The twist angle can be used to continuously tune the magnitude and sign of circular dichroism, with maximum CD near 15° and symmetric behaviour for angles beyond 60° under reversed handedness.
- The low-energy mode is selectively excited by one handedness of light, giving large extinction CD because it is an out-of-phase mode with small net dipole and weak scattering.
- Arranging the stacks in a triangular lattice produces a surface lattice resonance that hybridizes with the anti-phase stack mode, yielding a sharp Fano peak whose excitation can be switched by the handedness of the incident light.
- For twist angles larger than about 15°, the low-energy mode evolves toward in-phase multipolar excitations, so any model based solely on fixed in-phase/anti-phase dipole splitting cannot describe the system.
Reading between the lines
- A testable extension: varying the interlayer separation should shift the crossover angle (around 15°) if near-field coupling drives the dephasing; if it does not, the mechanism would need revision.
- The lattice result suggests that the pitch of the array is an independent tuning knob for narrowband chiral responses, but the paper's own unsuccessful experimental attempt indicates that practical realization currently requires better phase control, lower numerical aperture, or larger patterned areas.
- The same geometric-frustration argument could be tested in other threefold-symmetric stacked motifs (e.g., gammadions) to see whether the lack of even-pole modes is the general prerequisite for this angle-dependent dephasing behaviour.
Signed reviews
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental and numerical study of the chiroptical response of stacked gold triskelia: two identical, intrinsically chiral planar monomers separated by about 30 nm and twisted by an angle α. FTIR extinction spectra under RCP and LCP illumination show two near-infrared multipolar modes whose intensities and spectral positions depend strongly on α, yielding large circular dichroism; FDTD simulations reproduce the main spectral trends, including the sign change between the 30° and 60° configurations. The authors argue that the standard Born–Kuhn picture and simple in-phase/anti-phase dipole hybridization are insufficient, and instead propose that the low-energy mode exhibits a twist-angle-dependent dephasing between the dipole moments of the two monomers: anti-phase at small angles, perpendicular near 15°, and progressively in-phase toward 60°. They also simulate a triangular lattice of stacks in which a surface lattice resonance hybridizes with the low-energy mode and is selectively excited by one circular polarization, although the experimental reproduction of this lattice effect was unsuccessful.
Significance. If the angle-dependent dephasing mechanism is correct, the paper provides a useful extension of chiral plasmonic mode-hybridization models for intrinsically chiral multipolar monomers, and it supplies a systematic FTIR dataset that should be valuable to the community. The strengths of the manuscript are real: the central CD spectra are not produced by inverse fitting (FDTD uses literature optical constants and geometric inputs; Lorentzian fits extract only peak positions), the authors transparently cite their earlier independent 2022 work, and the unsuccessful lattice experiment is explicitly disclosed. However, the central mechanistic claim depends on single-time snapshots that do not determine the relative phase between the two monomers, and the lattice portion is simulation-only; the significance of the paper therefore hinges on whether the phase analysis can be made rigorous.
major comments (3)
- [Results and discussion, Fig. 2 caption and Supplementary Fig. S1] The central mechanistic claim—that the low-energy mode evolves from anti-phase at small twist angles through perpendicular polarizations near 15° to in-phase toward 60°—is supported only by computed charge distributions and instantaneous dipole moments taken at “arbitrary values of the phase of the incoming illumination,” as stated in the Fig. 2 caption. For two harmonic dipoles p1=A1 cos(ωt+φ1)e1 and p2=A2 cos(ωt+φ2)e2, the instantaneous angle between p1 and p2 depends on the time origin, the amplitude ratio A1/A2, and the phase difference Δφ=φ1−φ2; a single snapshot cannot uniquely determine Δφ. The same limitation applies to the classification of the high-energy mode as in-phase. Because this angle-dependent dephasing is the paper’s main departure from the Born–Kuhn picture, the authors should provide a phase-resolved analysis—for example complex induced dipole moments or complex multipole coefficients for the two monomers as a function of twist angle and frequency—before the mechanistic conclusion can be accepted.
- [Abstract and “Results and discussion,” lattice section (Fig. 5)] The abstract states that the hybridized surface-lattice mode “demonstrates the capability to be selectively switched on and off through the light polarization handedness,” but the manuscript explicitly reports that the experimental attempt to reproduce these lattice results “was unsuccessful.” The selective excitation is therefore a simulation-based prediction, not a demonstrated capability. The wording in the abstract and conclusions should be changed accordingly, and the limitations listed in the text (narrow SLR spectral width, numerical aperture of the focusing optics, and finite patterned area) should be reflected in those statements.
- [Results and discussion, Figs. 3 and 4 and Eq. (1)] The experiment–simulation agreement is described only as “qualitative” and “remarkably qualitative,” and no error bars or reproducibility measures are shown for the experimental extinction or CD spectra. Since the paper makes quantitative claims about the modulation of CD with twist angle, including a sign change between 30° and 60°, the authors should report the variability across nominally identical samples or repeated measurements, and specify how the CD in Eq. (1) was computed from the measured extinction spectra (e.g., baseline selection and normalization). Without this information the quantitative comparison between the FTIR and FDTD panels in Fig. 4 cannot be assessed.
minor comments (3)
- [Abstract and throughout] The text contains numerous typographical errors (e.g., “dicrhoism,” “acomplished,” “lithograpy,” “behavious,” “consissts,” “uo to”), and the abstract contains the placeholder-like symbols “HI°” and “KL°” that should read “15°” and “60°.” These should be corrected before publication.
- [Methods and Supplementary Information] The Lorentzian peak fitting is described only by a reference to the Supplementary Information (Fig. SX); the main text should state the number of fitted peaks, the fitting range, and whether the peak parameters were allowed to vary independently between the two circular polarizations and between samples.
- [Fig. 4 and its caption] The colormaps of experimental and simulated extinction spectra should use a clearly defined and, where possible, common color scale; the current caption does not indicate how the color scale is normalized, which makes it difficult to judge the claimed qualitative agreement.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: the central results are parameter-free FDTD simulations compared with FTIR data, and self-citations are contextual rather than load-bearing.
full rationale
The paper's derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks. The FTIR extinction spectra and the FDTD simulations are independent inputs: FDTD uses literature gold optical constants (Johnson and Christy) and geometric parameters, with no parameter fitted to enforce the observed circular dichroism. The Lorentzian fits are used only to extract peak positions, not to generate the predicted spectra or the dichroism. The central mechanistic claim about angle-dependent dephasing between the two triskelia is presented as an interpretation of simulated charge and dipole-moment data, not as a quantity defined by the inputs. The self-citation to the authors' 2022 Sci. Rep. work is transparent and used for context (strong inter-element interactions and poor-scattering modes) rather than as the sole justification for the new twist-angle dephasing claim; that prior work is independently published and externally falsifiable. The lattice surface-lattice-resonance prediction is a parameter-free simulation prediction, and the failed experimental reproduction is honestly reported as a limitation, which does not indicate circularity. The acknowledged caveat that simulations at different angles correspond to arbitrary values of the illumination phase is a robustness concern about the mode-character evidence, but it does not reduce any equation or prediction to its own inputs; therefore it does not raise the circularity score.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (1)
- Lorentzian peak parameters (position, width, amplitude) =
varies with twist angle; not numerically tabulated in text
assumptions (5)
- standard math Maxwell's equations and the FDTD discretization used in Lumerical provide an adequate model of the plasmonic response.
- domain assumption Gold optical constants from Johnson and Christy (1972) accurately describe the fabricated gold at near-infrared wavelengths.
- domain assumption The simulated stack can be approximated as embedded in a homogeneous, lossless medium of refractive index n=1.45, neglecting the Si substrate and Si/SiO2 interfaces present in the measurements.
- domain assumption For the lattice simulations, an infinite periodic triangular array with plane-wave illumination at normal incidence captures the physics of the fabricated finite arrays.
- domain assumption The triskelion geometry with threefold rotational symmetry and a 120-degree bend in each arm is intrinsically 3D chiral, so planar reciprocity arguments do not forbid extinction CD.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Dichroism of coupled multipolar plasmonic modes in twisted triskelion stacks." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/46D57VJ6
@misc{pith2026250114547,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Dichroism of coupled multipolar plasmonic modes in twisted triskelion stacks},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/46D57VJ6}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.14547}
}
read the original abstract
We present a systematic investigation of the optical response to circularly polarized illumination in twisted stacked plasmonic nanostructures. The system consissts in two identical, parallel gold triskelia centrally aligned and rotated at a central angle relative to each other. Sample fabrication was acomplished through a double electron beam lithograpy process. This stack holds two plasmonic modes of multipolar character in the near-infrared range, showing a strong dependence of their excitation intensities on the handedness of the circularly polarized incident light. This translates in a large circular dicrhoism which can be modulated by adjusting the twist angle of the stack. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and numerical simulations were employed to characterize the spectral features of the modes. Remarkable, in contrast to previous results in other stacked nanostructures, the system's response exhibits a behavious analogous to that of two interacting dipoles only at small angles. As the angle approaches 15 degrees, where the maximum dichroism is observed, more complex modes of the stack emerge. These modes evolve towards two in-phase multipolar excitations of the two triskelia as the angle increases uo to 60 degrees. Finally, simulations for a triangular array of such stacked elements show a sharp mode arising from the hybridization of a surface lattice resonance with the low-energy mode of the stack.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
DE GRUYTER Nanophotonics 2025 Research Article Javier Rodríguez-Álvarez*, Joan Vila-Comamala, Antonio García-Martín, Albert Guerrero, Xavier Borrisé, Francesc Pérez-Murano, Christian David, Alvaro Blanco, Carlos Pecharromán, Xavier Batlle, Arantxa Fraile Rodríguez, and Amílcar Labarta. Dichroism of coupled multipolar plasmonic modes in twisted triskelion ...
work page 2025
-
[2]
Origins of biomolecular handedness,
S. F. Mason, “Origins of biomolecular handedness,” Nature, vol. 311, no. 5981, pp. 19–23, 1984, doi: 10.1038/311019a0
-
[3]
A survey of left-handed helices in protein structures,
M. Novotny and G. J. Kleywegt, “A survey of left-handed helices in protein structures,” J. Mol. Biol., vol. 347, no. 2, pp. 231–241, 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.01.037
-
[4]
A. Wibe, A. K. Borg-Karlson, M. Persson, T. Norin, and H. Mustaparta, “Enantiomeric composition of monoterpene hydrocarbons in some conifers and receptor neuron discrimination of α-pinene and limonene enantiomers in the pine weevil, Hylobius abietis,” J. Chem. Ecol., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 273–287, 1998, doi: 10.1023/A:1022580308414
-
[5]
Optical helicity and optical chirality in free space and in the presence of matter,
L. V. Poulikakos, J. A. Dionne, and A. García-Etxarri, “Optical helicity and optical chirality in free space and in the presence of matter,” Symmetry (Basel)., vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 1–16, 2019, doi: 10.3390/sym11091113
-
[6]
Optical chirality and its interaction with matter,
Y. Tang and A. E. Cohen, “Optical chirality and its interaction with matter,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 104, no. 16, pp. 1–4, 2010, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.163901
-
[7]
A. O. Govorov, Z. Fan, P. Hernandez, J. M. Slocik, and R. R. Naik, “Theory of circular dichroism of nanomaterials comprising chiral molecules and nanocrystals: Plasmon enhancement, dipole interactions, and dielectric effects,” Nano Lett., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1374–1382, 2010, doi: 10.1021/nl100010v
-
[8]
Chiral nanocrystals: Plasmonic spectra and circular dichroism,
Z. Fan and A. O. Govorov, “Chiral nanocrystals: Plasmonic spectra and circular dichroism,” Nano Lett., vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 3283–3289, 2012, doi: 10.1021/nl3013715
Show all 40 references
-
[9]
Amino-acid- A nd peptide-directed synthesis of chiral plasmonic gold nanoparticles,
H. E. Lee et al., “Amino-acid- A nd peptide-directed synthesis of chiral plasmonic gold nanoparticles,” Nature, vol. 556, no. 7701, pp. 360–364, 2018, doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0034-1
2018 doi
-
[10]
Chiral plasmonics,
M. Hentschel, M. Schäferling, X. Duan, H. Giessen, and N. Liu, “Chiral plasmonics,” Sci. Adv., vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 1–12, 2017, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1602735
2017 doi
-
[11]
Biomacromolecular Stereostructure Mediates Mode Hybridization in Chiral Plasmonic Nanostructures,
C. Jack et al., “Biomacromolecular Stereostructure Mediates Mode Hybridization in Chiral Plasmonic Nanostructures,” Nano Lett., vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 5806–5814, 2016, doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02549
2016 doi
-
[12]
Active Chiral Plasmonics,
X. Yin et al., “Active Chiral Plasmonics,” Nano Lett., vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 4255–4260, 2015, doi: 10.1021/nl5042325
2015 doi
-
[13]
Macroscopic Layers of Chiral Plasmonic Nanoparticle Oligomers from Colloidal Lithography,
R. Ogier, Y. Fang, M. Svedendahl, P. Johansson, and M. Käll, “Macroscopic Layers of Chiral Plasmonic Nanoparticle Oligomers from Colloidal Lithography,” ACS Photonics, vol. 1, no. 10, pp. 1074–1081, 2014, doi: 10.1021/ph500293u
2014 doi
-
[14]
Broken time reversal of light interaction with planar chiral nanostructures,
A. S. Schwanecke, A. Krasavin, D. M. Bagnall, A. Potts, A. V. Zayats, and N. I. Zheludev, “Broken time reversal of light interaction with planar chiral nanostructures,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 91, no. 24, pp. 1–4, 2003, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.247404
2003 doi
-
[15]
Optical Manifestations of Planar Chirality,
A. Papakostas, A. Potts, D. M. Bagnall, S. L. Prosvirnin, H. J. Coles, and N. I. Zheludev, “Optical Manifestations of Planar Chirality,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 90, no. 10, p. 4, 2003, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.107404
2003 doi
-
[16]
Giant optical activity in quasi-two-dimensional planar nanostructures,
M. Kuwata-Gonokami et al., “Giant optical activity in quasi-two-dimensional planar nanostructures,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 95, no. 22, pp. 1–4, 2005, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.227401
2005 doi
-
[17]
Plasmonic split-ring resonators as dichroic nanophotonic DNA biosensors,
A. W. Clark, A. Glidle, D. R. S. Cumming, and J. M. Cooper, “Plasmonic split-ring resonators as dichroic nanophotonic DNA biosensors,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., vol. 131, no. 48, pp. 17615–17619, 2009, doi: 10.1021/ja905910q
2009 doi
-
[18]
The Reciprocity Theorem for Corrugated Surfaces Used in Conical Diffraction Mountings,
P. Vincent and M. Nevière, “The Reciprocity Theorem for Corrugated Surfaces Used in Conical Diffraction Mountings,” Opt. Acta Int. J. Opt., vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 889–898, Jul. 1979, doi: 10.1080/713820075
1979 doi
-
[19]
Optical activity in planar chiral metamaterials: Theoretical study,
B. Bai, Y. Svirko, J. Turunen, and T. Vallius, “Optical activity in planar chiral metamaterials: Theoretical study,” Phys. Rev. A - At. Mol. Opt. Phys., vol. 76, no. 2, 2007, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.76.023811
2007 doi
-
[20]
Revisiting the physics of Fano resonances for nanoparticle oligomers,
B. Hopkins, A. N. Poddubny, A. E. Miroshnichenko, and Y. S. Kivshar, “Revisiting the physics of Fano resonances for nanoparticle oligomers,” Phys. Rev. A - At. Mol. Opt. Phys., vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 1–10, 2013, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.88.053819
2013 doi
-
[21]
Planar plasmonic chiral nanostructures,
S. Zu, Y. Bao, and Z. Fang, “Planar plasmonic chiral nanostructures,” Nanoscale, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 3900–3905, 2016, doi: 10.1039/c5nr09302c
2016 doi
-
[22]
Circular dichroism induced by Fano resonances in planar chiral oligomers,
B. Hopkins, A. N. Poddubny, A. E. Miroshnichenko, and Y. S. Kivshar, “Circular dichroism induced by Fano resonances in planar chiral oligomers,” Laser Photonics Rev., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 137–146, 2016, doi: First author, Second author, and Third author, Running title DE GRUYTE...
2016 doi
-
[23]
Plasmonic ratchet wheels: Switching circular dichroism by arranging chiral nanostructures,
V. K. Valev et al., “Plasmonic ratchet wheels: Switching circular dichroism by arranging chiral nanostructures,” Nano Lett., vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 3945–3948, 2009, doi: 10.1021/nl9021623
2009 doi
-
[24]
DNA-based self-assembly of chiral plasmonic nanostructures with tailored optical response,
A. Kuzyk et al., “DNA-based self-assembly of chiral plasmonic nanostructures with tailored optical response,” Nature, vol. 483, no. 7389, pp. 311–314, 2012, doi: 10.1038/nature10889
2012 doi
-
[25]
Gold helix photonic metamaterial as broadband circular polarizer,
J. K. Gansel et al., “Gold helix photonic metamaterial as broadband circular polarizer,” Science (80-. )., vol. 325, no. 5947, pp. 1513–1515, 2009, doi: 10.1126/science.1177031
2009 doi
-
[26]
Giant chiroptical response of twisted metal nanorods due to strong plasmon coupling,
A. Wu, Y. Y. Tanaka, and T. Shimura, “Giant chiroptical response of twisted metal nanorods due to strong plasmon coupling,” APL Photonics, vol. 6, no. 12, 2021, doi: 10.1063/5.0069371
2021 doi
-
[27]
Strong optical activity from twisted-cross photonic metamaterials,
M. Decker et al., “Strong optical activity from twisted-cross photonic metamaterials,” Opt. Lett., vol. 34, no. 16, p. 2501, 2009, doi: 10.1364/ol.34.002501
2009 doi
-
[28]
Twisted split-ring-resonator photonic metamaterial with huge optical activity,
M. Decker, R. Zhao, C. M. Soukoulis, S. Linden, and M. Wegener, “Twisted split-ring-resonator photonic metamaterial with huge optical activity,” Opt. Lett., vol. 35, no. 10, p. 1593, 2010, doi: 10.1364/ol.35.001593
2010 doi
-
[29]
Stereometamaterials,
N. Liu, H. Liu, S. Zhu, and H. Giessen, “Stereometamaterials,” Nat. Photonics, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 157–162, 2009, doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2009.4
2009 doi
-
[30]
Strongly tunable circular dichroism in gammadion chiral phase-change metamaterials,
T. Cao, L. Zhang, R. E. Simpson, C. Wei, and M. J. Cryan, “Strongly tunable circular dichroism in gammadion chiral phase-change metamaterials,” Opt. Express, vol. 21, no. 23, p. 27841, 2013, doi: 10.1364/oe.21.027841
2013 doi
-
[31]
Optical planar chiral metamaterial designs for strong circular dichroism and polarization rotation,
D.-H. Kwon, P. L. Werner, and D. H. Werner, “Optical planar chiral metamaterial designs for strong circular dichroism and polarization rotation,” Opt. Express, vol. 16, no. 16, p. 11802, 2008, doi: 10.1364/oe.16.011802
2008 doi
-
[32]
Tunable circular dichroism through absorption in coupled optical modes of twisted triskelia nanostructures,
J. Rodríguez-Álvarez, A. García-Martín, A. Fraile Rodríguez, X. Batlle, and A. Labarta, “Tunable circular dichroism through absorption in coupled optical modes of twisted triskelia nanostructures,” Sci. Rep., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03908-2
2022 doi
-
[33]
Asymmetric propagation of electromagnetic waves through a planar chiral structure,
V. A. Fedotov, P. L. Mladyonov, S. L. Prosvirnin, A. V. Rogacheva, Y. Chen, and N. I. Zheludev, “Asymmetric propagation of electromagnetic waves through a planar chiral structure,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 97, no. 16, pp. 1–4, 2006, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.167401
2006 doi
-
[35]
Quantitative Verhältnisse und Beziehungen bei der natürlichen optischen Aktivität,
W. Kuhn, “Quantitative Verhältnisse und Beziehungen bei der natürlichen optischen Aktivität,” Zeitschrift für Phys. Chemie, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 14–36, 1929, doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/zpch-1929-0403
1929 doi
-
[36]
Systematic study of antibonding modes in gold nanorod dimers and trimers,
K. D. Osberg, N. Harris, T. Ozel, J. C. Ku, G. C. Schatz, and C. A. Mirkin, “Systematic study of antibonding modes in gold nanorod dimers and trimers,” Nano Lett., vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 6949–6954, 2014, doi: 10.1021/nl503207j
2014 doi
-
[37]
Fingers crossed: Optical activity of a chiral dimer of plasmonic nanorods,
B. Auguié, J. L. Alonso-Gómez, A. Guerrero-Martínez, and L. M. Liz-Marzán, “Fingers crossed: Optical activity of a chiral dimer of plasmonic nanorods,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett., vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 846–851, 2011, doi: 10.1021/jz200279x
2011 doi
-
[38]
Interpreting chiral nanophotonic spectra: The plasmonic Born-Kuhn model,
X. Yin, M. Schäferling, B. Metzger, and H. Giessen, “Interpreting chiral nanophotonic spectra: The plasmonic Born-Kuhn model,” Nano Lett., vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 6238–6243, 2013, doi: 10.1021/nl403705k
2013 doi
-
[40]
Properties of a - SiO x : H Thin Films Deposited from Hydrogen Silsesquioxane Resins,
M. J. Loboda, C. M. Grove, and R. F. Schneider, “Properties of a - SiO x : H Thin Films Deposited from Hydrogen Silsesquioxane Resins,” J. Electrochem. Soc., vol. 145, no. 8, pp. 2861–2866, 1998, doi: 10.1149/1.1838726
1998 doi
-
[41]
Ultrasmooth silver thin films deposited with a germanium nucleation layer,
V. J. Logeeswaran et al., “Ultrasmooth silver thin films deposited with a germanium nucleation layer,” Nano Lett., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 178–182, 2009, doi: 10.1021/nl8027476
2009 doi
-
[42]
Lumerical Inc
“Lumerical Inc.” https://www.lumerical.com/ (accessed Jan. 10, 2023)
2023
Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.