Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Evolution of X-ray Gas in SN 1987A from 2007 to 2021: Ring Fading and Ejecta Brightening Unveiled through Differential Emission Measure Analysis

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read By tracking SN 1987A's full X-ray temperature distribution from 2007 to 2021, this paper shows the equatorial ring is fading while shock-heated ejecta are brightening into a 3-5 keV component.

desk verdict Useful 14-epoch DEM evolution of SN 1987A, with a central trend that is likely real; the flashy new 3-5 keV ejecta peak is still hostage to an oversimplified net–kT power law. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.18090 v1 pith:LAWARRTB submitted 2025-01-30 astro-ph.HE

Lei Sun , Salvatore Orlando , Emanuele Greco , Marco Miceli , Yang Chen , Jacco Vink , Ping Zhou This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords supernovaremnantsSN1987AX-rayspectroscopydifferentialemissionmeasureshock-heatedejectaequatorialringnon-equilibriumionizationXMM-Newton
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the X-ray gas in SN 1987A is not well described by the two or three discrete temperature components used in earlier models, and that its true structure is a continuous temperature distribution whose shape has been changing since about 2014. Fitting a differential emission measure (DEM) model to XMM-Newton RGS and EPIC-pn spectra taken over 14 years, the authors find a major emission peak near 0.5–1 keV whose total emission measure peaked around 2011–2014 and has since declined, alongside a high-temperature tail extending past 5 keV that kept brightening and by 2020–2021 grew into a secondary peak at 3–5 keV. Comparing these DEMs with three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic simulations, they identify the fading peak with the shocked equatorial ring and the rising secondary peak with newly reverse-shock-heated ejecta. A drop in the centroid energy of the Fe K line over the last few epochs adds independent support for a growing, less-ionized ejecta component. The result matters because it ties observations directly to numerical simulations and defines the stage at which the remnant's X-ray emission shifts from ring-dominated to ejecta-dominated.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the differential emission measure (DEM) model c7pvnei, an extension of the XSPEC c6pvmkl model to non-equilibrium-ionization plasmas. It represents the plasma with 40 temperature bins logarithmically spaced between 0.1 and 10 keV; each bin contributes a single vnei (non-equilibrium ionization) spectrum with temperature T_i and emission measure given by a Chebyshev polynomial of order 7 in log-temperature. To keep the fit tractable, the model assumes the ionization parameter at each temperature follows a single power law, τ(T) = τ_1keV (T/1 keV)^β, plus a single set of metal abundances across all bins. The result is a quasi-continuous temperature distribution that can be compared directly, point by point, with the continuous emission-measure distribution extracted from MHD simulations, which is precisely what the paper does to identify the ring and ejecta components.

What would settle it

Re-fit the same spectra while letting the ionization parameter vary freely at each temperature bin, or fix it to the temperature-dependent values from the MHD simulations used in the paper, and check whether the 3–5 keV secondary peak and the post-2014 decline of the 0.5–1 keV peak persist; if they vanish, they are artifacts of the assumed power-law ionization relation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that the X-ray-emitting plasma in SN 1987A has been undergoing a slow regime change. Using a Chebyshev-parameterized DEM model (c7pvnei) with 40 temperature bins from 0.1 to 10 keV, the authors reconstruct the continuous emission measure distribution at 14 epochs. In all epochs the distribution contains a major peak at ~0.5–1 keV and a tail to ≳5 keV, but the evolution is especially clear: the major peak's emission measure rises to a maximum around 2011–2014 and then declines, while the tail's emission measure increases continuously and in 2020–2021 appears as a secondary peak at ~3–5 keV. The observed DEM profiles agree with MHD simulation predictions, allowing the authors to attribute the major peak to the shocked equatorial ring and the secondary peak to reverse-shock-heated ejecta. The average metal abundances derived from the DEM are systematically higher than those from discrete-temperature fits, and the Fe K line centroid has dropped from ~6.65–6.7 keV to ≶6.6 keV, both of which point to a growing contribution from metal-poorer, less-ionized outer ejecta.

Load-bearing premise

The weakest link is the assumption that the ionization age of every plasma component is a single power-law function of temperature, which the paper itself calls 'over-simplified'; if the real relation differs by component, the reconstructed DEM peaks—including the claimed secondary ejecta peak—could shift or be spurious.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The equatorial ring of SN 1987A is now past its X-ray peak; its soft X-ray flux and surface brightness should continue to decline as the forward shock moves into lower-density material.
  • The newly shocked ejecta will become the dominant thermal X-ray source over the next several years, offering a time-resolved view of reverse-shock heating in a young remnant.
  • Because the DEM-fit abundances are higher than those from two- or three-temperature fits, earlier abundance estimates for SN 1987A are likely biased low, and similar biases may affect other SNR abundance measurements.
  • The Fe K centroid decline predicts that the average iron ionization state will keep dropping until the reverse shock reaches the metal-rich core, at which point line centroids and abundances should rise again.
  • The DEM-vs-simulation comparison provides a template for using continuous temperature distributions instead of discrete components when connecting SNR X-ray spectra to hydrodynamic models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extending the same DEM analysis to the pre-2007 Chandra LETG/HETG epochs would test whether the major-peak emission measure indeed peaked around 2011–2014, or whether the apparent turnover is a model artifact.
  • The 3–5 keV secondary peak should be visible in broadband hard X-ray imaging; targeted NuSTAR or future high-resolution missions may be able to image the ejecta component separately from the ring.
  • Relaxing the power-law ionization assumption by fixing τ(T) to the MHD-simulated values for each component would turn the DEM fit into a stricter test of the simulations and would reveal how much of the secondary peak is required by the data rather than by the assumed relation.
  • If the Fe K centroid decline is confirmed at higher significance with future microcalorimeter missions, the measured centroid can be inverted to estimate the mass of newly shocked ejecta, providing a quantitative link to the DEM's secondary peak.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper presents a differential emission measure (DEM) analysis of XMM-Newton RGS and EPIC-pn observations of SN 1987A taken between 2007 and 2021. The authors model the thermal X-ray spectra with a Chebyshev-parameterized DEM composed of 40 vnei temperature bins, with the ionization parameter of each bin tied to temperature through a power law (Eq. 3). They find a persistent major DEM peak at ~0.5–1 keV whose emission measure declines after about 2014, and a high-temperature tail that grows in EM and appears to form a secondary peak at ~3–5 keV in 2020–2021. The DEM results are compared with MHD simulations, leading the authors to interpret the major peak as the equatorial ring (now fading) and the secondary peak as newly shocked ejecta (now brightening). A complementary analysis of the Fe K line centroid shows a possible recent decrease, interpreted as additional evidence for newly shocked ejecta.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper provides a valuable continuous temperature-structure characterization of a benchmark supernova remnant, extending the epoch coverage to 2021 and offering a direct comparison with MHD simulations. The work is significant because it moves beyond discrete-temperature fits and identifies a temporal transition from ring-dominated to ejecta-dominated X-ray emission, a prediction that can be tested with future XRISM and other missions. The authors have also included several commendable strengths: validation of the DEM reconstruction on synthetic one-, two-, and three-temperature spectra and on a 2014 MHD synthetic spectrum; MCMC-based uncertainty estimation with full corner plots and best-fit tables in appendices; and a cross-check with an alternative vpshock-based DEM model. The main concern is that the load-bearing assumption of a power-law net–kTe relation (Eq. 3) is acknowledged by the authors themselves to be oversimplified, and the specific new feature (the 3–5 keV secondary peak) appears in an epoch not covered by the model validation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.1, Eq. (3)] The power-law net–kTe relation is load-bearing for the secondary-peak claim, but the paper's own Section 4.3 states that this assumption is 'over-simplified' and that the MHD simulations show an EM-weighted net(kTe) that is not a power law, with a plateau at 0.3–1 keV, a decrease at 1–5 keV, and an increase at >5 keV. The claimed secondary peak at 3–5 keV lies exactly in the temperature range where the simulated net decreases, whereas the fitted power-law index beta is generally >= 0, forcing an increasing net with temperature. This could artificially concentrate emission measure at high temperatures. The validation in Figure 1d uses the 2014 synthetic spectrum, not the 2020–2021 epochs where the secondary peak emerges, so it does not demonstrate that Eq. (3) preserves the very feature being claimed. Please add a synthetic-spectrum test based on the 2020 and 2021 MHD epochs, and/or a systematic exploration of alternative net(T) prescriptions (e.g., the simulated EM-weighted relation), to demonstrate that the secondary peak is not an artifact of the assumed ionization model. This is the main correctness risk of the paper.
  2. [Section 3.1, abundances] The assumption that metal abundances are identical across all temperature bins, while acknowledged as a simplification, may bias the DEM distribution if the high-temperature component is indeed dominated by shocked ejecta with abundances different from those of the ring. The paper's own comparison with Maitra et al. (2022), who allowed different abundances for different components and found significantly higher abundances in the hot component, indicates that this assumption may not be physically adequate. Since the physical interpretation of the secondary peak as ejecta depends on the separation of components in temperature, please quantify the sensitivity of the DEM profile, especially in the 3–5 keV region, to allowing abundance differences between low- and high-temperature bins (or at least between the ring and ejecta components). Without such a test, the identification of the secondary peak with ejecta is less secure.
  3. [Section 4.1, Figure 4] The component identification (major peak = ring, secondary peak = ejecta) relies on comparing the observed DEM with the same group's MHD simulations (Orlando et al. 2020; Greco et al. 2022). While this is a reasonable interpretive framework, it is not an independent validation, and the paper itself notes discrepancies (observed peak temperatures are higher and absolute DEMs are lower than simulated). The observed trends of major-peak decline and tail brightening could in principle be produced by a single evolving plasma component (e.g., the forward shock encountering lower-density regions) without requiring a distinct ejecta component. Please make the model dependence of the component labels more explicit, and consider a quantitative test, such as fitting the 2020/2021 spectra with a model that includes a ring component plus an independent ejecta component with separate abundances and ionization states, to strengthen the claim that a newly shocked ejecta component is required by the data.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The sentence 'Our DEM results consistent well with simulations' should read 'Our DEM results are consistent with simulations.'
  2. [Section 4.3] Given the explicit statement that the power-law net–kTe assumption 'might be over-simplified' and that 'the results must be treated with caution,' the abstract and conclusions should carry a corresponding caveat about the model-dependent nature of the secondary peak and the ejecta-brightening claim.
  3. [Appendix D] The statistical significance of the Fe K centroid decrease is modest (f-test p-value ~0.05, corresponding to roughly 2σ; the extrapolation test is also caveated by large scatter in the earlier epochs). The text should describe this as a 'possible' or 'tentative' decrease rather than stating it as a firm detection, and it should be made clear that this is not an independent confirmation of the DEM result.
  4. [Section 3.3] The claim that the DEM model provides 'significantly better fit' than discrete-temperature models should be qualified, since the reported Delta C values range from -4 to -109; for epochs with Delta C close to -4, the improvement is not statistically significant. Please state the average improvement and note the epoch-to-epoch variation.
  5. [Section 3.2, Figure 1d] The validation on the 2014 MHD synthetic spectrum is useful, but the text should explicitly note that this validation does not cover the 2020–2021 epochs where the new secondary peak appears; this limitation is central to the robustness of the main conclusion.
  6. [Table 1 and Figure 2] The 2019 observation has a much shorter exposure (32.4 ks for EPIC-pn, PGTI 11.1 ks) than the other epochs; the DEM uncertainties for that epoch appear larger in Figure 2. Please discuss whether the 2019 data point could be affected by the lower signal-to-noise ratio, and whether it influences the inferred onset of the tail rise.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the DEM distributions are independent spectral fits, and the same-group simulations are used only for interpretation and validation, not to construct the measured DEM.

full rationale

The paper's central products are DEM distributions obtained by fitting XMM-Newton RGS and EPIC-pn spectra with a Chebyshev-parameterized DEM model (c7pvnei) whose parameters (Chebyshev coefficients, normalization, abundances, and the two net–T parameters of Eq. 3) are free and fitted to the data. The observed DEM features—the major peak at ~0.5–1 keV, the high-temperature tail, the post-2014 decline of the major peak, and the emerging 3–5 keV secondary peak—are outputs of spectral fitting, not inputs. Equation (3) is a modeling assumption inherited from prior literature and explicitly flagged by the authors as possibly over-simplified (Section 4.3); this is a systematic/correctness risk, not circularity, because the power-law relation does not by construction determine the DEM shape. The comparison with MHD simulations (Orlando et al. 2020; Greco et al. 2022) provides an interpretation of the fitted components as ring/ejecta/H II region and a validation test on synthetic 2014 spectra; although several authors overlap with the present paper, those simulations are externally published, constrained by multiwavelength data, and used to interpret rather than to generate the observed DEM. The Fe K centroid decrease is an independent spectral measurement. No derivation step reduces to its own inputs by definition or by fit, so the paper is not significantly circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The DEM fitting uses 18 free parameters per epoch including the Chebyshev shape coefficients, abundances, ionization parameters, and column density. The most load-bearing assumptions are the power-law net-kTe relation and the assumption of uniform abundances across temperature bins. No new physical entities are posited.

free parameters (6)
  • beta (ionization parameter power-law index) = varies per epoch (e.g., -0.121 to 1.937)
    Index in Eq. (3) linking net to temperature; fitted freely, affects DEM reconstruction; paper itself calls the power-law assumption oversimplified.
  • tau_1keV (ionization parameter at 1 keV) = e.g., (1.4-9.0)e11 cm^-3 s
    Fitted normalization of the net-T relation; constrains ionization state of plasma bins.
  • Chebyshev coefficients a1..a7 = per epoch
    Shape parameters of the DEM distribution; the central peaks and tail are determined by these fitted coefficients.
  • Metal abundances (N, O, Ne, Mg, Si, S, Fe) = per epoch
    Fitted to line strengths; abundances affect continuum normalization and DEM; assumed identical across temperature bins.
  • LMC absorption column NH_LMC = ~(2.2-2.8)e21 cm^-2
    Fitted per epoch to account for local absorption; affects soft-band spectral shape.
  • M and N (Chebyshev order and bin number) = M=7, N=40
    Chosen by tests; resolution and systematic temperature shifts (up to 25% at 4 keV) depend on this choice.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Plasma emission in each temperature bin is described by a single-temperature vnei model in collisional ionization equilibrium.
    Spectral model (Sec. 3.1); ignores multi-temperature structure within a bin and possible non-thermal emission below 10 keV (argued in Sec. 4.2).
  • ad hoc to paper Ionization parameter net is a power-law function of temperature (Eq. 3).
    Simplification adopted to keep model tractable; acknowledged in Sec. 4.3 as questionable for the complex plasma.
  • domain assumption Metal abundances are identical across all temperature bins.
    Sec. 3.1; assumption justified by claiming most emission from shocked CSM/outer ejecta with similar abundances.
  • domain assumption The two-Gaussian decomposition of the observed DEM profiles adequately represents the underlying components.
    Sec. 3.3; used to define 'major peak' and 'high-temperature tail', but the number of components is chosen post hoc.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Evolution of X-ray Gas in SN 1987A from 2007 to 2021: Ring Fading and Ejecta Brightening Unveiled through Differential Emission Measure Analysis." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LAWARRTB

@misc{pith2026250118090,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Evolution of X-ray Gas in SN 1987A from 2007 to 2021: Ring Fading and Ejecta Brightening Unveiled through Differential Emission Measure Analysis},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LAWARRTB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.18090}
}
abstract

As the nearest supernova (SN) observed since Kepler's SN of 1604, SN 1987A provides an unprecedented opportunity to study in detail the early evolution of supernova remnants (SNRs). Despite extensive studies through both observations and simulations, there is still an urgent need for a more effective approach to integrate the results from two sides. In this study, we conducted a detailed differential emission measure (DEM) analysis on the XMM-Newton observations taken in 2007 to 2021 to characterize the continuous temperature structure of SN 1987A, which can be better compared with simulations. The X-ray plasma exhibit a temperature distribution with a major peak at $\sim0.5$-$1$ keV and a high-temperature tail extending to $\gtrsim5$ keV. The emission measure (EM) of the major peak started to decline around 2014, while the EM of the tail continued increasing and appears to have formed a secondary peak at $\sim3$-$5$ keV in recent years. Our DEM results consistent well with simulations, which help to further identify the major peak as originating from the equatorial ring and the secondary peak as arising from the newly shocked ejecta. Together with the simulations, our DEM analysis reveals recent fading of the ring and brightening of the ejecta in X-rays from SN 1987A. Additionally, we observed a recent decrease in the centroid energy of Fe K line, providing further evidence of newly shocked ejecta.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.18090 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The DEM model applied on simulated spectra. Panel a–c shows the DEM fitting results of the 1-T, 2-T, and 3-T vnei spectra, respectively. The red lines and stars denote the temperatures and ionization parameters used for simulating the spectra, the blue lines and areas show the best-fit DEM distributions and their 1-σ uncertainties, and the orange dashed lines and areas show the best-fit net dis￾tributions and their … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. DEM fitting results for SN 1987A in different epochs based on XMM-Newton RGS and EPIC-pn observations. In the bottom right panel we present the average temperatures of the major peak and the high-temperature tail (the blue and red data points in the upper sub-panel, respectively), and the ratio between the EMs of the two components (the green data points in the lower sub-panel) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p00… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Two examples of the fitted RGS + EPIC-pn spectra with residuals, taken from 2009 Jan and 2020 Nov. The spectra from other epochs are presented in Appendix B. and the major peak has been continuously increasing, from ∼ 0.1 at around 2007 to ≳ 0.2 after 2014, and reaching ∼ 0.4 at around 2020 (the bottom right panel in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (20 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison between MHD simulations and the DEM fitting results of SN 1987A. Top: simulated plasma EM distributions in kTe–net diagrams (based on the B18.3 model in Orlando et al. 2020), overlaid with 2-T (Sun et al. 2021) and 3-T (Greco et al. 2022) spectral fitting re…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Metal abundances (left) and abundance ratios with respect to Ne (right) in SN 1987A. The black dashed lines indicate the mean values. Reduced chi-squares χ 2 ν = χ 2 /dof are calculated based on the mean values. For a p-value of 0.002 (∼ 3σ level), the critical reduced…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Light curve (upper panel) and centroid energy evolution (lower panel) of the Fe K line from SN 1987A. Data points before 2019 are adopted from Sun et al. (2021), while the last two are new results (highlighted with orange areas). Points with ≳ 3σ detection are shown in…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: DEM fitting results, MCMC corner plots, and the fitted spectra for the observation taken in January 2007. The values of NH, τ1keV, and norm are in units of 1022 cm−2 , cm−3 s, and cm−5 , respectively [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_18.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_19.png]
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_20.png]
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_21.png]
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: DEM fitting results for SN 1987A based on the vpshock model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_22.png]
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: Piecewise linear fit to the Fe K centroid energy. Left: fit to the observations from 2007 to 2019, and then extrapolate the result to 2021. The red dashed line denotes the best-fit model, and the shaded regions indicate the 1,2,3-sigma uncertainty ranges. Right: fit t…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 4 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Chandra X-Ray Imaging and Spatially Resolved Spectroscopy of SN 1987A: Energy-Dependent Morphology of the Equatorial Ring

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Soft X-ray emission from SN 1987A's equatorial ring becomes broader and extends inward after ~2012, while hard X-rays remain compact, indicating growing contribution from reverse-shock-heated interior material.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    X H<|7 & J] y F b7 T5r nĐ,lUmHؿǀ[ss] Q l, xLN6 e3,y s hq U@xb߰BB bjg/hs x6b R

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command E...

    arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    2021, , 916, 76, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac052d

    Alp , D., Larsson , J., & Fransson , C. 2021, , 916, 76, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac052d

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac052d 2021

  5. [5]

    G., Dwek , E., Bouchet , P., et al

    Arendt , R. G., Dwek , E., Bouchet , P., et al. 2016, , 151, 62, 10.3847/0004-6256/151/3/62

    doi:10.3847/0004-6256/151/3/62 2016

  6. [6]

    Arnaud , K. A. 1996, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, ed. G. H. Jacoby & J. Barnes , 17

    1996

  7. [7]

    J., Lyerly , W

    Borkowski , K. J., Lyerly , W. J., & Reynolds , S. P. 2001, , 548, 820, 10.1086/319011

    doi:10.1086/319011 2001

  8. [8]

    N., Park , S., & Ravi , A

    Bray , E., Burrows , D. N., Park , S., & Ravi , A. P. 2020, , 899, 21, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9c9e

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab9c9e 2020

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    Buote , D. A. 2000, , 311, 176, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03046.x

    2000

  2. [10]

    1975, , 200, L107, 10.1086/181908

    Castor , J., McCray , R., & Weaver , R. 1975, , 200, L107, 10.1086/181908

    1975 doi

  3. [11]

    V., Haberl , F., Sturm , R., & Canizares , C

    Dewey , D., Dwarkadas , V. V., Haberl , F., Sturm , R., & Canizares , C. R. 2012, , 752, 103, 10.1088/0004-637X/752/2/103

    2012 doi

  4. [12]

    A., Zhekov , S

    Frank , K. A., Zhekov , S. A., Park , S., et al. 2016, , 829, 40, 10.3847/0004-637X/829/1/40

    2016 doi

  5. [13]

    2013, , 768, 88, 10.1088/0004-637X/768/1/88

    Fransson , C., Larsson , J., Spyromilio , J., et al. 2013, , 768, 88, 10.1088/0004-637X/768/1/88

    2013 doi

  6. [14]

    2015, , 806, L19, 10.1088/2041-8205/806/1/L19

    Fransson , C., Larsson , J., Migotto , K., et al. 2015, , 806, L19, 10.1088/2041-8205/806/1/L19

    2015 doi

  7. [15]

    J., Kavanagh , P

    Fransson , C., Barlow , M. J., Kavanagh , P. J., et al. 2024, Science, 383, 898, 10.1126/science.adj5796

    2024 doi

  8. [16]

    J., et al

    Gabriel , C., Denby , M., Fyfe , D. J., et al. 2004, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 314, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems (ADASS) XIII, ed. F. Ochsenbein , M. G. Allen , & D. Egret , 759

    2004

  9. [17]

    M., & Rakowski , C

    Ghavamian , P., Laming , J. M., & Rakowski , C. E. 2007, , 654, L69, 10.1086/510740

    2007 doi

  10. [18]

    2020, , 638, A101, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038092

    Greco , E., Vink , J., Miceli , M., et al. 2020, , 638, A101, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038092

    2020 doi

  11. [19]

    2021, , 908, L45, 10.3847/2041-8213/abdf5a

    Greco , E., Miceli , M., Orlando , S., et al. 2021, , 908, L45, 10.3847/2041-8213/abdf5a

    2021 doi

  12. [20]

    2022, , 931, 132, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac679d

    ---. 2022, , 931, 132, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac679d

    2022 doi

  13. [21]

    2006, , 460, 811, 10.1051/0004-6361:20066198

    Haberl , F., Geppert , U., Aschenbach , B., & Hasinger , G. 2006, , 460, 811, 10.1051/0004-6361:20066198

    2006 doi

  14. [22]

    2008, , 676, 361, 10.1086/526517

    Heng , K., Haberl , F., Aschenbach , B., & Hasinger , G. 2008, , 676, 361, 10.1086/526517

    2008 doi

  15. [23]

    S., & Bleeker , J

    Kaastra , J. S., & Bleeker , J. A. M. 2016, , 587, A151, 10.1051/0004-6361/201527395

    2016 doi

  16. [24]

    S., Mewe , R., & Nieuwenhuijzen , H

    Kaastra , J. S., Mewe , R., & Nieuwenhuijzen , H. 1996, in UV and X-ray Spectroscopy of Astrophysical and Laboratory Plasmas, 411--414

    1996

  17. [25]

    2016, , 833, 147, 10.3847/1538-4357/833/2/147

    Larsson , J., Fransson , C., Spyromilio , J., et al. 2016, , 833, 147, 10.3847/1538-4357/833/2/147

    2016 doi

  18. [26]

    2019, , 886, 147, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4ff2

    Larsson , J., Fransson , C., Alp , D., et al. 2019, , 886, 147, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4ff2

    2019 doi

  19. [27]

    2023, , 949, L27, 10.3847/2041-8213/acd555

    Larsson , J., Fransson , C., Sargent , B., et al. 2023, , 949, L27, 10.3847/2041-8213/acd555

    2023 doi

  20. [28]

    S., Sugerman , B

    Lawrence , S. S., Sugerman , B. E., Bouchet , P., et al. 2000, , 537, L123, 10.1086/312771

    2000 doi

  21. [29]

    R., Mewe , R., Schrijver , C

    Lemen , J. R., Mewe , R., Schrijver , C. J., & Fludra , A. 1989, , 341, 474, 10.1086/167508

    1989 doi

  22. [30]

    2012, , 548, L3, 10.1051/0004-6361/201220595

    Maggi , P., Haberl , F., Sturm , R., & Dewey , D. 2012, , 548, L3, 10.1051/0004-6361/201220595

    2012 doi

  23. [31]

    2022, , 661, A30, 10.1051/0004-6361/202141104

    Maitra , C., Haberl , F., Sasaki , M., et al. 2022, , 661, A30, 10.1051/0004-6361/202141104

    2022 doi

  24. [32]

    N., et al

    Miceli , M., Orlando , S., Burrows , D. N., et al. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 236, 10.1038/s41550-018-0677-8

    2019 doi

  25. [33]

    2020, , 888, 111, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5dba

    Ono , M., Nagataki , S., Ferrand , G., et al. 2020, , 888, 111, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5dba

    2020 doi

  26. [34]

    L., & Bocchino , F

    Orlando , S., Miceli , M., Pumo , M. L., & Bocchino , F. 2015, , 810, 168, 10.1088/0004-637X/810/2/168

    2015 doi

  27. [35]

    2019, , 622, A73, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834487

    Orlando , S., Miceli , M., Petruk , O., et al. 2019, , 622, A73, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834487

    2019 doi

  28. [36]

    2020, , 636, A22, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936718

    Orlando , S., Ono , M., Nagataki , S., et al. 2020, , 636, A22, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936718

    2020 doi

  29. [37]

    A., Burrows , D

    Park , S., Zhekov , S. A., Burrows , D. N., Garmire , G. P., & McCray , R. 2004, , 610, 275, 10.1086/421701

    2004 doi

  30. [38]

    A., Burrows , D

    Park , S., Zhekov , S. A., Burrows , D. N., et al. 2006, , 646, 1001, 10.1086/505023

    2006 doi

  31. [39]

    A., Burrows , D

    Park , S., Zhekov , S. A., Burrows , D. N., & McCray , R. 2005, , 634, L73, 10.1086/498848

    2005 doi

  32. [40]

    P., Park , S., Zhekov , S

    Ravi , A. P., Park , S., Zhekov , S. A., et al. 2021, , 922, 140, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac249a

    2021 doi

  33. [41]

    2024, , 966, 147, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3800

    ---. 2024, , 966, 147, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3800

    2024 doi

  34. [42]

    C., Ghavamian , P., Bohdan , A., et al

    Raymond , J. C., Ghavamian , P., Bohdan , A., et al. 2023, , 949, 50, 10.3847/1538-4357/acc528

    2023 doi

  35. [43]

    C., & Dopita , M

    Russell , S. C., & Dopita , M. A. 1992, , 384, 508, 10.1086/170893

    1992 doi

  36. [44]

    P., White , N

    Singh , K. P., White , N. E., & Drake , S. A. 1996, , 456, 766, 10.1086/176695

    1996 doi

  37. [45]

    Sonneborn , G., Pun , C. S. J., Kimble , R. A., et al. 1998, , 492, L139, 10.1086/311106

    1998 doi

  38. [46]

    2010, , 515, A5, 10.1051/0004-6361/200913317

    Sturm , R., Haberl , F., Aschenbach , B., & Hasinger , G. 2010, , 515, A5, 10.1051/0004-6361/200913317

    2010 doi

  39. [47]

    2025, accepted for publication in ApJ

    Sun , L., Orlando , S., Greco , E., et al. 2025, accepted for publication in ApJ

    2025

  40. [48]

    2021, , 916, 41, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac033d

    Sun , L., Vink , J., Chen , Y., et al. 2021, , 916, 41, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac033d

    2021 doi

  41. [49]

    2012, , 20, 49, 10.1007/s00159-011-0049-1

    Vink , J. 2012, , 20, 49, 10.1007/s00159-011-0049-1

    2012 doi

  42. [50]

    2020, Physics and Evolution of Supernova Remnants , 10.1007/978-3-030-55231-2

    ---. 2020, Physics and Evolution of Supernova Remnants , 10.1007/978-3-030-55231-2

    2020 doi

  43. [51]

    M., Lauberts , A., Jorgensen , H

    West , R. M., Lauberts , A., Jorgensen , H. E., & Schuster , H. E. 1987, , 177, L1

    1987

  44. [52]

    2000, , 542, 914, 10.1086/317016

    Wilms , J., Allen , A., & McCray , R. 2000, , 542, 914, 10.1086/317016

    2000 doi

  45. [53]

    A., McCray , R., Borkowski , K

    Zhekov , S. A., McCray , R., Borkowski , K. J., Burrows , D. N., & Park , S. 2006, , 645, 293, 10.1086/504285

    2006 doi

  46. [54]

    A., McCray , R., Dewey , D., et al

    Zhekov , S. A., McCray , R., Dewey , D., et al. 2009, , 692, 1190, 10.1088/0004-637X/692/2/1190

    2009 doi

  47. [55]

    A., Park , S., McCray , R., Racusin , J

    Zhekov , S. A., Park , S., McCray , R., Racusin , J. L., & Burrows , D. N. 2010, , 407, 1157, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16967.x

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.