Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Unusual X-ray Oxygen Line Ratios of SN 1987A Arising From the Absorption of Galactic Hot Interstellar Medium

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Foreground hot-gas absorption, not charge exchange or resonant scattering, best explains SN 1987A's unusually high oxygen line ratios.

desk verdict A plausible new explanation for SN 1987A's odd oxygen line ratios—foreground hot halo absorption—that is well-argued but needs a joint constant-τ fit to close the loop. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.18091 v2 pith:TSTB4QDC submitted 2025-01-30 astro-ph.HE

Lei Sun , Salvatore Orlando , Emanuele Greco , Marco Miceli , Yiping Li , Yang Chen , Jacco Vink , Ping Zhou This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords supernovaremnantsSN1987AX-rayspectroscopyoxygenlineratiosOVIIG-ratioVIIILy-beta/Ly-alphahotinterstellarmediumresonantabsorption
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports that fourteen years of XMM-Newton RGS spectra of SN 1987A show oxygen line ratios that standard plasma models cannot reproduce: an O VII G-ratio above 1 and an O VIII Ly$\beta$/Ly$\alpha$ ratio above 0.2. It systematically checks non-equilibrium ionization, charge exchange, and resonant scattering, and finds that none can fully explain the data. It then proposes that absorption by hot gas in the foreground Galactic halo selectively removes resonance-line photons, adding Gaussian absorption components at the O VII resonance and O VIII Ly$\alpha$ energies and deriving optical depths $\tau_{\rm OVII}\sim0.6$ and $\tau_{\rm OVIII}\sim0.2$. If correct, previous analyses that ignored this absorption underestimated the oxygen abundance of SN 1987A by about 20%, revising the N/O ratio to about 1.2. The claim matters because similar unusually high O line ratios are seen in other supernova remnants, where foreground absorption may be playing a hidden role.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is resonant absorption of line photons by foreground ions: the same physical process as resonant scattering, but occurring outside the emitting source, where a re-emitted photon is effectively lost from the line of sight. The paper implements it as two Gaussian absorption components (the gabs model) centered on the O VII resonance line at 0.5739 keV and the O VIII Ly$\alpha$ line at 0.6535 keV, with line-center optical depth $\tau = \omega/(2\pi\sigma)$ in terms of the absorption strength $\omega$ and width $\sigma$. The ratio of the two measured optical depths, combined with known oscillator strengths, fixes the H-like to He-like oxygen ion fraction in the absorber; assuming collisional ionization equilibrium, that ratio corresponds to $kT_{\rm e}\sim0.15$ keV, and the absolute optical depths give the oxygen column density through the standard resonant-absorption optical depth formula. The argument then uses the fact that resonance lines have much larger oscillator strengths than the forbidden, intercombination, and Ly$\beta$ lines, so the foreground screen suppresses exactly the lines whose flux anomalies were observed.

What would settle it

A direct test is to fit a single optical depth for O VII and O VIII shared by all 14 epochs: if the stacked data strongly reject a common $\tau_{\rm OVII}\sim0.6$ and $\tau_{\rm OVIII}\sim0.2$, the static-screen interpretation fails. Alternatively, a high-resolution spectrum that resolves the absorption line at 0.5739 keV and finds no narrow O VII feature with optical depth near 0.6 would disprove the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the most likely origin of the high O VII G-ratio and high O VIII Ly$\beta$/Ly$\alpha$ ratio in SN 1987A is resonant absorption by hot gas lying in front of the remnant along the line of sight, most plausibly the hot phase of the Galactic halo. Using the DEM model of Sun et al. (2025) as the baseline, the authors find residuals at the O VII resonance line, which is overpredicted, and the O VIII Ly$\alpha$ line, also overpredicted, while the O VII forbidden line is underpredicted. Adding two Gaussian absorption components at 0.5739 keV and 0.6535 keV improves the fit substantially in ten of fourteen epochs and strongly in all seven epochs when the O lines were brightest (2007-2012). The best-fit optical depths average to $\tau_{\rm OVII}\sim0.6$ and $\tau_{\rm OVIII}\sim0.2$, which imply an absorbing gas temperature $kT_{\rm e}\sim0.15$ keV and oxygen column density $N_{\rm O}\sim0.5\times10^{16}$ cm$^{-2}$, consistent with hot gas in the Galactic halo. Correcting for this absorption brings the intrinsic O VII G-ratio down to 0.5-0.8, consistent with an NEI plasma at $kT_{\rm e}\sim0.3$-$1$ keV, and raises the fitted O abundance by about 20%.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes that the absorbing hot gas is a static foreground screen whose optical depth is the same at every epoch, so the per-epoch fitted values in Table 2 can be averaged into a single $\tau_{\rm OVII}\sim0.6$ and $\tau_{\rm OVIII}\sim0.2$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the foreground absorption is real, the intrinsic O VII G-ratio of SN 1987A is 0.5-0.8, removing the need for exotic emission mechanisms and making the hot plasma consistent with NEI expectations at $kT_{\rm e}\sim0.3$-$1$ keV.
  • Oxygen abundances derived from X-ray spectra of SN 1987A must be revised upward by roughly 20%, and the N/O ratio by number becomes about 1.2, matching optical determinations.
  • Other LMC supernova remnants showing high O VII G-ratios may have part of their line-ratio anomaly caused by the same foreground hot halo gas rather than by charge exchange or resonant scattering within the remnant.
  • Future high-resolution X-ray spectroscopy that can resolve the absorption lines directly should see a stable, narrow O VII absorption feature at 0.5739 keV and O VIII at 0.6535 keV toward SN 1987A.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the same two Gaussian absorption components could be fitted jointly to all fourteen epochs with a single shared $\tau_{\rm OVII}$ and $\tau_{\rm OVIII}$; if such a global fit succeeds, it would turn the averaged optical depths into a tested physical parameter of the foreground gas.
  • Beyond the paper: high-resolution spectra of other Magellanic supernova remnants with elevated O VII G-ratios would show whether a common foreground absorber, rather than each remnant's internal physics, is responsible for the anomaly.
  • Beyond the paper: the derived absorber temperature and column density predict that O VII and O VIII absorption lines should be present in the spectra of background X-ray sources near SN 1987A, which could be checked with existing Chandra or XRISM observations along neighboring sightlines.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports high O VII G-ratios (≳1) and high O VIII Lyβ/Lyα ratios (≳0.2) in multi-epoch XMM-Newton RGS spectra of SN 1987A, and argues that these ratios cannot be explained by non-equilibrium ionization, charge exchange, or resonant scattering. The authors add two Gaussian absorption components at the O VII resonance and O VIII Lyα line energies, fit them per epoch, obtain average optical depths τ_OVII∼0.6 and τ_OVIII∼0.2, infer kTe∼0.15 keV and N_O∼0.5×10^16 cm^-2 for a foreground Galactic hot ISM, and use the absorption-corrected fluxes to revise the oxygen abundance upward by ~20%.

Significance. If correct, the foreground-absorption interpretation provides a clean explanation for the anomalous oxygen line ratios in SN 1987A and implies that similar corrections may be needed for other Magellanic SNRs, with direct consequences for abundance measurements. The paper is valuable for its systematic assessment of NEI, CX, and RS alternatives, including a Monte Carlo treatment of resonant scattering in the equatorial-ring geometry, and for the consistency between the inferred absorber properties and independent measurements of the Galactic halo. However, the main statistical test for a constant foreground screen is currently missing, so the central claim rests on per-epoch spectral fits rather than on a test of the screen hypothesis itself.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 4.4, Table 2] The central claim that a static foreground screen absorbs the O VII resonance and O VIII Lyα lines makes a direct prediction: the optical depths should be the same in every epoch. The paper never tests this. Table 2 fits τ_OVII and τ_OVIII independently in each of 14 epochs, obtaining values from 0 to 0.76 and 0 to 0.39, and the footnote in Sec. 4.4 states that the authors were 'unable to fix the absorption strength at a same value' because the source flux changes. That argument is not statistically valid: a joint fit with τ_OVII and τ_OVIII tied across epochs and with per-epoch source normalizations would be the correct test and is straightforward with XSPEC linking. As published, the per-epoch Gaussian absorbers may be absorbing whatever residual sits at the line energies (residual DEM/plasma mismatch, Fe-L contamination, or a small CX contribution) rather than a real constant screen. I request a common-τ joint fit, or a clear demonstration that it is strongly rejected.
  2. [Sec. 3 and Sec. 4.4, Table 3] After correcting for foreground absorption, the intrinsic O VIII Lyβ/Lyα ratios in Table 3 are still 0.15–0.26, with several epochs above the NEI/CIE expectation of ≲0.15. The paper reconciles this only by invoking a post hoc correction for Fe XVIII F6 contamination at an average ~25% level, estimated from emissivity-weighted averages over a wide temperature/ionization range rather than fitted to the spectra. Since Fe XVIII F6 at 0.775 keV is essentially unresolved from O VIII Lyβ with RGS, this correction is load-bearing: without it, the absorption scenario fails to explain the second anomalous ratio. The authors should fit the Fe-L complex self-consistently, or at least include Fe XVIII F6 as a model component, and show that the corrected intrinsic ratio is then consistent with NEI plasma.
  3. [Sec. 4.4, Table 2] The statistical evidence for absorption is heterogeneous: 11 of 14 epochs give ΔAIC < 0, but several epochs have ΔAIC > 0 (e.g., 2014 Nov, 2016 Nov, 2019 Nov) and some best-fit τ values are zero or consistent with zero. The quoted average optical depths τ_OVII~0.6 and τ_OVIII~0.2 are informal averages of heterogeneous per-epoch values. A proper combined analysis, for example a simultaneous fit to all RGS spectra with common τ and common absorber centroids and widths, would provide the correct global significance and the correct uncertainties for the derived kTe and N_O.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Title] The title contains a typo: 'F rom' should be 'From'.
  2. [Table 2] The caption reads 'Gaussion absorption fitting result'; it should be 'Gaussian absorption fitting result'.
  3. [Sec. 4.3] The text says 'Sedov-Tylor gas distribution'; this should be 'Sedov-Taylor'.
  4. [Sec. 4.4] In the final paragraph of Sec. 4.4, 'Lyb/Lya' appears instead of Lyβ/Lyα, apparently due to missing LaTeX macros.
  5. [Table 2] The F-test p-values are converted to approximate sigma levels; since the model comparison involves C-statistics in non-linear fits, the F-test is only approximate and should be labeled as such.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No formal circularity: the absorption optical depths are fitted parameters with external consistency checks rather than predictions derived from the model itself.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain—measuring oxygen line ratios, ruling out NEI, CX, and RS, adding Gaussian absorbers at the O VII resonance and O VIII Ly-alpha lines, fitting tau, converting tau to temperature and column density via Eqs. 3 and 1, and comparing with Galactic-halo measurements—contains no step in which an output is defined from an input or a fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction. The tau values are fitting parameters, and the 'intrinsic' ratios in Table 3 are corrections computed from that same fit; this is model dependence common to spectral fitting, not a circular reduction, because the fit was not constructed to force the NEI consistency, and the derived kTe ~0.15 keV and N_O ~0.5e16 cm^-2 are independently compared with Galactic-halo absorption and emission measurements. The explicit limitation in the footnote of Section 4.4 is acknowledged: a static foreground screen predicts constant tau, yet Table 2 shows epoch-dependent tau values and the authors do not perform a joint common-tau fit; this weakens the physical inference but is a model-testing and correctness concern, not a definitional circularity. No load-bearing self-citation is present: the DEM baseline from Sun et al. (2025) is prior work by the same group, but the residuals are empirical and the absorption scenario is tested with new fits rather than by citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on the adopted DEM baseline, the CIE assumption for the absorber, a specific RS geometry, and a post hoc Fe XVIII contamination estimate. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Gaussian absorption strength and width for O VII resonance line = per epoch; τ_OVII ranges 0 to 0.76 (Table 2)
    Two free parameters per epoch (strength ω and width σ) describe the absorption component at 0.574 keV; the derived optical depth τ = ω/(2πσ) is fitted, not predicted.
  • Gaussian absorption strength and width for O VIII Lyα line = per epoch; τ_OVIII ranges 0 to 0.39 (Table 2)
    Two free parameters per epoch describe the absorption component at 0.654 keV; this is similarly fitted and used to derive the O VIII optical depth.
  • O abundance in DEM re-fits = 0.19 to 0.54 solar (Table 3)
    The oxygen abundance is re-fit after adding absorption components; its reported ~20% increase is a central result.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The DEM model of Sun et al. (2025) is an accurate baseline for the intrinsic X-ray emission of SN 1987A.
    Residuals from this model define the detected line anomalies; if the model misassigns continuum or line emissivities, the inferred absorption is spurious.
  • domain assumption The absorbing hot gas is in collisional ionization equilibrium (CIE) with kTe ~0.15 keV and an O ionization balance from standard atomic data.
    Used in Section 4.4 to convert the fitted τ_OVIII/τ_OVII ratio into a temperature (Eq. 3) and then into an oxygen column density.
  • ad hoc to paper The RS Monte Carlo simulation geometry (smooth ring with Ri=0.58 arcsec, Rs=1.02 arcsec, h=0.44 arcsec, homogeneous density) captures the relevant scattering in SN 1987A.
    This geometry is assumed in Section 4.3 rather than constrained by data; different clumping or an additional scattering component could change the RS conclusion.
  • ad hoc to paper The Fe XVIII F6 line contributes on average ~25% of the measured O VIII Lyβ flux.
    This contamination fraction is estimated from a grid of plasma parameters in Section 3, not measured directly, and is invoked to reconcile the absorption-corrected Lyβ/Lyα ratio with NEI expectations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Unusual X-ray Oxygen Line Ratios of SN 1987A Arising From the Absorption of Galactic Hot Interstellar Medium." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TSTB4QDC

@misc{pith2026250118091,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Unusual X-ray Oxygen Line Ratios of SN 1987A Arising From the Absorption of Galactic Hot Interstellar Medium},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TSTB4QDC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.18091}
}
abstract

Recent high-resolution X-ray spectroscopic studies have revealed unusual oxygen line ratios, such as the high O VII forbidden-to-resonance ratio, in several supernova remnants. While the physical origin is still under debate, for most of them, it has been suggested that this phenomenon arises from either charge exchange (CX) or resonant scattering (RS). In this work, we report the high O VII G-ratio ($\gtrsim1$) and high O VIII Ly$\beta$/Ly$\alpha$ ratio ($\gtrsim0.2$) found in multiepoch XMM-Newton RGS observations of SN 1987A. The line ratios cannot be fully explained by non-equilibrium ionization effects, CX, or RS. We suggest the absorption of foreground hot gas as the most likely origin, which plays the major role in modifying line fluxes and line ratios. Based on this scenario, we introduced two Gaussian absorption components at the O VII resonance line and the O VIII Ly$\alpha$ line and constrained the optical depth of the two lines as $\tau_{\rm OVII}\sim0.6$ and $\tau_{\rm OVIII}\sim0.2$. We estimated the temperature as $kT_{\rm e}\sim0.15$ keV and the oxygen column density as $N_{\rm O}\sim0.5\times10^{16}$ cm$^{-2}$ for the absorbing gas, which is consistent with the hot interstellar medium in the Galactic halo. Neglecting this absorption component may lead to an underestimation of the O abundance. We revised the O abundance of SN 1987A, which is increased by $\sim20\%$ compared with previous results. The N/O ratio by number of atoms is revised to be $\sim1.2$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.18091 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. An example of the O-emitting band spectra of SN 1987A fitted with the DEM model (Sun et al. 2025). The major O lines are labeled. The red boxes highlight the major residuals left in the DEM modeling, where the model overestimated the O VII resonance line and the O VIII Lyα lines while underestimated the O VII forbidden line. The two subplots show the zoom-in view of O VII Heα and O VIII Lyα, fitted with the “nlapec … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. O line ratios and their temporal evolutions in SN 1987A. The blue and red data points denote the O VII G-ratio and the O VIII Lyβ/Lyα flux ratio, respectively. The gray under-filled curve indicates the temporal evolution of the total O line flux (O VII Heα + O VIII Lyα). 0.775 keV, line label adopted from Brown et al. 1998), which may lead to an overestimated O VIII Lyβ/Lyα ra￾tio. The soft-band X-ray emission in SN… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Left: O VII G-ratio as a function of kTe and net for ionizing NEI plasma. The observed G-ratio for SN 1987A is indicated by the cyan contours, where the dashed line denotes the average value and dotted lines indicate the error range. The shaded contour regions indicate the levels of total O VII Heα flux, as < 10%, < 1%, and < 0.1% of the maximum flux, respectively. Right: O VIII Lyβ/α ratio as a function of kTe, for… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: kTe and net parameter spaces confined by the observed G-ratios and Lyα/Heα ratios of O, Ne, and Mg for SN 1987A. 3-T vnei results are adopted from Greco et al. (2022) into this effect by changing the collision velocity from 50 km s−1 to 1000 km s−1 and by adding anothe…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Top: geometry setup adopted for the MC sim￾ulation of RS effect in SN 1987A. Middle: maximum RS optical depth as a function of the inclination angle. Bottom: RS-modified G-ratio, relative to the value without RS, as a function of inclination angle. The gray dashed line…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: An example of the MCMC corner plots for the two Gaussian absorption components (O VII resonance line on the left and O VIII Lyα on the right, adopting from the fit to 2009 Jan observation). The top-left and bottom-right panels show the probability distribution function…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Studying the multi-phase interstellar medium in the Large Magellanic Cloud with SRG/eROSITA -- I. Analysis of diffuse X-ray emission

    astro-ph.HE 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A full-disk spectroscopic survey of diffuse X-ray emission in the LMC with eROSITA yields hot-gas luminosity 1.9e38 erg/s and reveals a southeast pressure peak with low alpha-element abundances.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    1974, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716

    Akaike, H. 1974, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716

    1974

  2. [2]

    2021, ApJ, 916, 76, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac052d

    Alp, D., Larsson, J., & Fransson, C. 2021, ApJ, 916, 76, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac052d

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac052d 2021

  3. [3]

    Amano, Y., Uchida, H., Tanaka, T., Gu, L., & Tsuru, T. G. 2020, ApJ, 897, 12, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab90fc

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab90fc 2020

  4. [4]

    Arnaud, K. A. 1996, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, ed. G. H. Jacoby & J. Barnes, 17

    1996

  5. [5]

    N., Park, S., & Ravi, A

    Bray, E., Burrows, D. N., Park, S., & Ravi, A. P. 2020, ApJ, 899, 21, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9c9e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab9c9e 2020

  6. [6]

    V., Beiersdorfer, P., Liedahl, D

    Brown, G. V., Beiersdorfer, P., Liedahl, D. A., Widmann, K., & Kahn, S. M. 1998, ApJ, 502, 1015, doi: 10.1086/305941

    work page doi:10.1086/305941 1998

  7. [7]

    N., Michael, E., Hwang, U., et al

    Burrows, D. N., Michael, E., Hwang, U., et al. 2000, ApJL, 543, L149, doi: 10.1086/317271

    doi:10.1086/317271 2000

  8. [8]

    2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2310.03892, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2310.03892

    Raymond, J. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2310.03892, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2310.03892

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.03892 2023

Show all 72 references
  1. [9]

    D., Zhang, G.-Y., Zhang, S., & Ji, L

    Chen, Y., Wang, Q. D., Zhang, G.-Y., Zhang, S., & Ji, L. 2018, ApJ, 861, 138, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaca32

    2018 doi

  2. [10]

    Canizares, C. R. 2012, ApJ, 752, 103, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/752/2/103

    2012 doi

  3. [11]

    A., Zhekov, S

    Frank, K. A., Zhekov, S. A., Park, S., et al. 2016, ApJ, 829, 40, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/829/1/40

    2016 doi

  4. [12]

    J., et al

    Gabriel, C., Denby, M., Fyfe, D. J., et al. 2004, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 314, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems (ADASS) XIII, ed. F. Ochsenbein, M. G. Allen, & D. Egret, 759

    2004

  5. [13]

    C., & Hartigan, P

    Ghavamian, P., Raymond, J., Smith, R. C., & Hartigan, P. 2001, ApJ, 547, 995, doi: 10.1086/318408

    2001 doi

  6. [14]

    2021, ApJL, 908, L45, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abdf5a —

    Greco, E., Miceli, M., Orlando, S., et al. 2021, ApJL, 908, L45, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abdf5a —. 2022, ApJ, 931, 132, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac679d

    2021 doi

  7. [15]

    Gu, L., Kaastra, J., & Raassen, A. J. J. 2016, A&A, 588, A52, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527615

    2016 doi

  8. [16]

    2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2301.11335, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2301.11335

    Gu, L., & Shah, C. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2301.11335, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2301.11335

    2023 doi arXiv

  9. [17]

    2006, A&A, 460, 811, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066198

    Haberl, F., Geppert, U., Aschenbach, B., & Hasinger, G. 2006, A&A, 460, 811, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066198

    2006 doi

  10. [18]

    A., Kosenko, D., & Vink, J

    Helder, E. A., Kosenko, D., & Vink, J. 2010, ApJL, 719, L140, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/719/2/L140

    2010 doi

  11. [19]

    A., Broos, P

    Helder, E. A., Broos, P. S., Dewey, D., et al. 2013, ApJ, 764, 11, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/764/1/11

    2013 doi

  12. [20]

    2008, ApJ, 676, 361, doi: 10.1086/526517

    Heng, K., Haberl, F., Aschenbach, B., & Hasinger, G. 2008, ApJ, 676, 361, doi: 10.1086/526517

    2008 doi

  13. [21]

    B., & Shelton, R

    Henley, D. B., & Shelton, R. L. 2013, ApJ, 773, 92, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/773/2/92 Hitomi Collaboration, Aharonian, F., Akamatsu, H., et al. 2018, PASJ, 70, 10, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx127

    2013 doi

  14. [22]

    S., & Bleeker, J

    Kaastra, J. S., & Bleeker, J. A. M. 2016, A&A, 587, A151, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527395

    2016 doi

  15. [23]

    S., & Mewe, R

    Kaastra, J. S., & Mewe, R. 1995, A&A, 302, L13

    1995

  16. [24]

    S., Mewe, R., & Nieuwenhuijzen, H

    Kaastra, J. S., Mewe, R., & Nieuwenhuijzen, H. 1996, in UV and X-ray Spectroscopy of Astrophysical and Laboratory Plasmas, 411–414

    1996

  17. [25]

    2008, SSRv, 134, 155, doi: 10.1007/s11214-008-9310-y

    Richter, P. 2008, SSRv, 134, 155, doi: 10.1007/s11214-008-9310-y

    2008 doi

  18. [26]

    2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2302.13775, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2302.13775 14

    Katsuda, S. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2302.13775, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2302.13775 14

    2023 doi arXiv

  19. [27]

    2011, ApJ, 730, 24, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/730/1/24 —

    Katsuda, S., Tsunemi, H., Mori, K., et al. 2011, ApJ, 730, 24, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/730/1/24 —. 2012, ApJ, 756, 49, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/756/1/49

    2011 doi

  20. [28]

    F., & Chevalier, R

    Kirshner, R., Winkler, P. F., & Chevalier, R. A. 1987, ApJL, 315, L135, doi: 10.1086/184875

    1987 doi

  21. [29]

    2022, PASJ, 74, 757, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psac033

    Koshiba, Y., Uchida, H., Tanaka, T., et al. 2022, PASJ, 74, 757, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psac033

    2022 doi

  22. [30]

    S., Sugerman, B

    Lawrence, S. S., Sugerman, B. E., Bouchet, P., et al. 2000, ApJL, 537, L123, doi: 10.1086/312771

    2000 doi

  23. [31]

    2024, ApJ, 967, 99, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3b94

    Li, Y., Zhang, G.-Y., Chen, Y., Sun, L., & Zhang, S. 2024, ApJ, 967, 99, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3b94

    2024 doi

  24. [32]

    1996, ApJ, 464, 924, doi: 10.1086/177380

    Lundqvist, P., & Fransson, C. 1996, ApJ, 464, 924, doi: 10.1086/177380

    1996 doi

  25. [33]

    2018, ApJS, 235, 28, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aab270

    Luo, Y., Fang, T., & Ma, R. 2018, ApJS, 235, 28, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aab270

    2018 doi

  26. [34]

    2022, A&A, 661, A30, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141104

    Maitra, C., Haberl, F., Sasaki, M., et al. 2022, A&A, 661, A30, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141104

    2022 doi

  27. [35]

    2010, ApJ, 717, 1140, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/717/2/1140

    Mattila, S., Lundqvist, P., Gr¨ oningsson, P., et al. 2010, ApJ, 717, 1140, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/717/2/1140

    2010 doi

  28. [36]

    1999, in X-Ray Spectroscopy in Astrophysics, ed

    Mewe, R. 1999, in X-Ray Spectroscopy in Astrophysics, ed. J. van Paradijs & J. A. M. Bleeker, Vol. 520, 109, doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-49199-6 2

    1999 doi

  29. [37]

    2010, A&A, 514, L2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913713

    Reale, F. 2010, A&A, 514, L2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913713

    2010 doi

  30. [38]

    N., et al

    Miceli, M., Orlando, S., Burrows, D. N., et al. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 236, doi: 10.1038/s41550-018-0677-8

    2019 doi

  31. [39]

    2020, A&A, 636, A22, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936718

    Orlando, S., Ono, M., Nagataki, S., et al. 2020, A&A, 636, A22, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936718

    2020 doi

  32. [40]

    2005, in IAU Colloq

    Panagia, N. 2005, in IAU Colloq. 192: Cosmic Explosions, On the 10th Anniversary of SN1993J, ed. J.-M. Marcaide & K. W. Weiler, Vol. 99, 585, doi: 10.1007/3-540-26633-X 78

    2005 doi

  33. [41]

    N., Garmire, G

    Park, S., Burrows, D. N., Garmire, G. P., et al. 2002, ApJ, 567, 314, doi: 10.1086/338492

    2002 doi

  34. [42]

    2004, ApJ, 610, 275, doi: 10.1086/421701

    McCray, R. 2004, ApJ, 610, 275, doi: 10.1086/421701

    2004 doi

  35. [43]

    A., Burrows, D

    Park, S., Zhekov, S. A., Burrows, D. N., et al. 2006, ApJ, 646, 1001, doi: 10.1086/505023

    2006 doi

  36. [44]

    A., Burrows, D

    Park, S., Zhekov, S. A., Burrows, D. N., & McCray, R. 2005, ApJL, 634, L73, doi: 10.1086/498848

    2005 doi

  37. [45]

    2023, A&A, 674, A195, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243992

    Ponti, G., Zheng, X., Locatelli, N., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A195, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243992

    2023 doi

  38. [46]

    2010, SSRv, 157, 103, doi: 10.1007/s11214-010-9731-2

    Porquet, D., Dubau, J., & Grosso, N. 2010, SSRv, 157, 103, doi: 10.1007/s11214-010-9731-2

    2010 doi

  39. [47]

    L., Park, S., Zhekov, S., et al

    Racusin, J. L., Park, S., Zhekov, S., et al. 2009, ApJ, 703, 1752, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/703/2/1752

    2009 doi

  40. [48]

    P., Park, S., Zhekov, S

    Ravi, A. P., Park, S., Zhekov, S. A., et al. 2021, ApJ, 922, 140, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac249a —. 2024, ApJ, 966, 147, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3800

    2021 doi

  41. [49]

    R., & Wang, Q

    Roberts, S. R., & Wang, Q. D. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 1340, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv319

    2015 doi

  42. [50]

    2002, A&A, 392, 103, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20020921

    Sasaki, M., Haberl, F., & Pietsch, W. 2002, A&A, 392, 103, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20020921

    2002 doi

  43. [51]

    K., Foster, A

    Smith, R. K., Foster, A. R., & Brickhouse, N. S. 2012, Astronomische Nachrichten, 333, 301, doi: 10.1002/asna.201211673

    2012 doi

  44. [52]

    L., & Petre, R

    Snowden, S. L., & Petre, R. 1994, ApJL, 436, L123, doi: 10.1086/187648

    1994 doi

  45. [53]

    Sonneborn, G., Pun, C. S. J., Kimble, R. A., et al. 1998, ApJL, 492, L139, doi: 10.1086/311106

    1998 doi

  46. [54]

    2010, A&A, 515, A5, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913317

    Sturm, R., Haberl, F., Aschenbach, B., & Hasinger, G. 2010, A&A, 515, A5, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913317

    2010 doi

  47. [55]

    R., & Lawrence, S

    Heathcote, S. R., & Lawrence, S. S. 2005, ApJS, 159, 60, doi: 10.1086/430408

    2005 doi

  48. [56]

    2025, accepted for publication in ApJ

    Sun, L., Orlando, S., Greco, E., et al. 2025, accepted for publication in ApJ

    2025

  49. [57]

    2021, ApJ, 916, 41, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac033d

    Sun, L., Vink, J., Chen, Y., et al. 2021, ApJ, 916, 41, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac033d

    2021 doi

  50. [58]

    2020, ApJ, 900, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aba524

    Suzuki, H., Yamaguchi, H., Ishida, M., et al. 2020, ApJ, 900, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aba524

    2020 doi

  51. [59]

    2022, ApJ, 933, 101, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac738f

    Tanaka, Y., Uchida, H., Tanaka, T., et al. 2022, ApJ, 933, 101, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac738f

    2022 doi

  52. [60]

    K., Broos, P

    Townsley, L. K., Broos, P. S., Chu, Y.-H., et al. 2011a, ApJS, 194, 16, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/194/1/16

    doi

  53. [61]

    K., Broos, P

    Townsley, L. K., Broos, P. S., & Povich, M. S. 2024, ApJS, 273, 5, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ad435c

    2024 doi

  54. [62]

    K., Broos, P

    Townsley, L. K., Broos, P. S., Chu, Y.-H., et al. 2011b, ApJS, 194, 15, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/194/1/15

    doi

  55. [63]

    2019, ApJ, 871, 234, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf8a6

    Uchida, H., Katsuda, S., Tsunemi, H., et al. 2019, ApJ, 871, 234, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf8a6

    2019 doi

  56. [64]

    B., et al

    Ueda, M., Sugiyama, H., Kobayashi, S. B., et al. 2022, PASJ, 74, 1396, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psac077 van der Heyden, K. J., Bleeker, J. A. M., Kaastra, J. S., &

    2022 doi

  57. [65]

    2003, A&A, 406, 141, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20030658

    Vink, J. 2003, A&A, 406, 141, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20030658

    2003 doi

  58. [66]

    D., Yao, Y., Tripp, T

    Wang, Q. D., Yao, Y., Tripp, T. M., et al. 2005, ApJ, 635, 386, doi: 10.1086/497584

    2005 doi

  59. [67]

    2000, ApJ, 542, 914, doi: 10.1086/317016

    Wilms, J., Allen, A., & McCray, R. 2000, ApJ, 542, 914, doi: 10.1086/317016

    2000 doi

  60. [68]

    M., Peterson, J

    Xu, H., Kahn, S. M., Peterson, J. R., et al. 2002, ApJ, 579, 600, doi: 10.1086/342828

    2002 doi

  61. [69]

    Canizares, C. R. 2008, ApJL, 672, L21, doi: 10.1086/526767

    2008 doi

  62. [70]

    A., McCray, R., Borkowski, K

    Zhekov, S. A., McCray, R., Borkowski, K. J., Burrows, D. N., & Park, S. 2006, ApJ, 645, 293, doi: 10.1086/504285 15

    2006 doi

  63. [71]

    A., McCray, R., Dewey, D., et al

    Zhekov, S. A., McCray, R., Dewey, D., et al. 2009, ApJ, 692, 1190, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/692/2/1190

    2009 doi

  64. [72]

    Burrows, D. N. 2010, MNRAS, 407, 1157, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16967.x

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.