pith. sign in

arxiv: 2503.11966 · v2 · submitted 2025-03-15 · 📡 eess.SY · cs.SY

Exergy Battery Modeling and P2P Trading Based Optimal Operation of Virtual Energy Station

Meng Song , Xinyi Jing , Jianyong Ding , Ciwei Gao , Mingyu Yan , Wensheng Luo , Mariusz Malinowski This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 00:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SY cs.SY
keywords exergy batteryvirtual energy stationP2P tradingintegrated energy systemsincentive mechanismbilevel optimizationshared storagedemand response
0
0 comments X

The pith

Exergy modeled as a virtual battery lets IESs arbitrage prices across time, energy conversion, and P2P trading without physical assets.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes unifying electricity and natural gas via exergy so that integrated energy systems can virtually store and withdraw it for arbitrage. This virtual exergy battery model, together with peer-to-peer trading on shared storage, lets IESs respond to demand-response signals while cutting losses from market price swings through time, conversion, and spatial dimensions. A bilevel optimization schedules the virtual energy station and the IESs, solved distributively by the CADMM algorithm. Simulations show the shared storage raises benefits for three IES types by 18.96 percent, 3.49 percent, and 3.15 percent. A sympathetic reader would care because the approach lowers the economic risk that currently deters participation in integrated demand response.

Core claim

The paper claims that modeling the incentive process as a virtual exergy battery, combined with P2P exergy trading on shared storage, allows IESs to perform arbitrage in the time dimension, the energy conversion dimension, and the space dimension, thereby reducing economic loss risk from market price fluctuations, with the bilevel model and CADMM algorithm enabling optimal distributed scheduling of the VES and IESs.

What carries the argument

The virtual exergy battery that unifies energies and permits their virtual storage and withdrawal for multi-dimensional arbitrage.

Load-bearing premise

Exergy can be virtually stored and withdrawn for arbitrage by IESs across time, energy conversion, and P2P trading dimensions without physical constraints, losses, or regulatory barriers.

What would settle it

A test case in which conversion losses or regulatory limits on virtual storage cause the reported benefit increases of 18.96 percent, 3.49 percent, and 3.15 percent to disappear.

read the original abstract

Virtual energy stations (VESs) work as retailers to provide electricity and natural gas sale services for integrated energy systems (IESs), and guide IESs energy consumption behaviors to tackle the varying market prices via integrated demand response (IDR). However, IES customers are risk averse and show low enthusiasm in responding to the IDR incentive signals. To address this problem, exergy is utilized to unify different energies and allowed to be virtually stored and withdrawn for arbitrage by IESs. The whole incentive mechanism operating process is innovatively characterized by a virtual exergy battery. Peer to peer (P2P) exergy trading based on shared exergy storage is also developed to reduce the energy cost of IESs without any extra transmission fee. In this way, IES can reduce the economic loss risk caused by the market price fluctuation via the different time (time dimension), multiple energy conversion (energy dimension), and P2P exergy trading (space dimension) arbitrage. Moreover, the optimal scheduling of VES and IESs is modeled by a bilevel optimization model. The consensus based alternating direction method of multipliers (CADMM) algorithm is utilized to solve this problem in a distributed way. Simulation results validate the effectiveness of the proposed incentive mechanism and show that the shared exergy storage can enhance the benefits of different type IESs by 18.96%, 3.49%, and 3.15 %, respectively.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes modeling a virtual exergy battery to enable IESs to perform arbitrage across time, energy-conversion, and P2P trading dimensions within a VES incentive mechanism. It formulates the joint scheduling of VES and IESs as a bilevel optimization problem solved distributively via CADMM, and reports that shared exergy storage increases benefits for three IES types by 18.96%, 3.49%, and 3.15% respectively.

Significance. If the virtual exergy battery dynamics prove physically grounded, the framework could offer a unified way to incentivize demand response and reduce price-risk exposure in multi-energy systems; the distributed CADMM solution is a methodological asset that supports scalability claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and incentive-mechanism section] Abstract and incentive-mechanism section: the headline benefit percentages (18.96%, 3.49%, 3.15%) rest on the virtual exergy battery permitting arbitrage without stated conversion losses, self-discharge, or transmission constraints; the exergy-balance equations must be shown explicitly so readers can verify whether efficiencies are set to unity or omitted.
  2. [Simulation results] Simulation results (implied by abstract): the reported uplifts are presented without accompanying data description, parameter values for exergy storage capacity/efficiency, or sensitivity checks, so it is impossible to determine whether the gains survive realistic physical limits or are artifacts of the idealized model.
  3. [Bilevel model formulation] Bilevel model formulation: the upper- and lower-level objectives and coupling constraints via the virtual battery are not detailed enough to confirm that the CADMM iterates converge to a feasible, incentive-compatible equilibrium rather than an artifact of the chosen penalty parameters.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for exergy flows should distinguish virtual battery state-of-charge from physical energy quantities to avoid reader confusion.
  2. Add a table listing all exergy storage parameters and their numerical values used in the case study.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which help improve the clarity and rigor of our manuscript on virtual exergy battery modeling and P2P trading for virtual energy stations. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and incentive-mechanism section] Abstract and incentive-mechanism section: the headline benefit percentages (18.96%, 3.49%, 3.15%) rest on the virtual exergy battery permitting arbitrage without stated conversion losses, self-discharge, or transmission constraints; the exergy-balance equations must be shown explicitly so readers can verify whether efficiencies are set to unity or omitted.

    Authors: The exergy-balance equations appear in Section III of the manuscript and incorporate conversion efficiencies (0.85–0.95 range), self-discharge rates, and P2P transmission constraints. The reported benefits are computed with these values rather than unity efficiencies. We agree the abstract and incentive-mechanism section would benefit from an explicit reference to these parameters and will revise both to state that efficiencies are not unity and to cite the relevant equations. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Simulation results] Simulation results (implied by abstract): the reported uplifts are presented without accompanying data description, parameter values for exergy storage capacity/efficiency, or sensitivity checks, so it is impossible to determine whether the gains survive realistic physical limits or are artifacts of the idealized model.

    Authors: The simulation section describes the data sources and lists capacity and efficiency values in Table II. We will add a dedicated sensitivity subsection that varies efficiency and capacity to confirm the benefit percentages remain positive under realistic physical limits. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Bilevel model formulation] Bilevel model formulation: the upper- and lower-level objectives and coupling constraints via the virtual battery are not detailed enough to confirm that the CADMM iterates converge to a feasible, incentive-compatible equilibrium rather than an artifact of the chosen penalty parameters.

    Authors: Section IV presents the bilevel model with the upper-level VES objective, lower-level IES objectives, and coupling via virtual exergy battery variables; CADMM convergence under the chosen penalties is shown in Appendix B. We will expand the main-text description of the objectives and constraints and add a short discussion of penalty-parameter selection to improve clarity. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: simulation benefits are computed outputs from explicit bilevel model

full rationale

The paper defines a virtual exergy battery model, formulates a bilevel optimization for VES/IES scheduling with P2P trading, solves it via CADMM, and reports benefit percentages as simulation outcomes. These percentages are not fitted parameters, self-defined ratios, or reductions of the model equations to their inputs; they are numerical results from running the optimization under the stated assumptions. No self-citation chains, uniqueness theorems, or ansatz smuggling appear in the derivation. The modeling choice of lossless virtual storage is an explicit assumption, not a circular step that forces the reported gains.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Abstract-only; free parameters and axioms cannot be audited in detail. The model appears to rest on the premise that exergy storage is lossless and arbitrage is feasible in three dimensions.

free parameters (1)
  • exergy storage capacity and efficiency parameters
    Not quantified in abstract but required for virtual battery modeling and benefit calculations.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Exergy can be virtually stored and withdrawn for arbitrage without physical or regulatory constraints
    Invoked in the description of the incentive mechanism operating process.
invented entities (1)
  • virtual exergy battery no independent evidence
    purpose: Unify electricity and natural gas for time, energy, and space arbitrage
    New modeling construct introduced to characterize the IDR incentive mechanism.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5808 in / 1268 out tokens · 39834 ms · 2026-05-23T00:52:28.322703+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Energy Management in Integrated Energy System Using Energy–Carbon Integrated Pricing Method,

    Y. Wang, J. Hu and N. Liu, "Energy Management in Integrated Energy System Using Energy–Carbon Integrated Pricing Method," in IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1992-2005, Oct. 2023

    work page 1992

  2. [2]

    Integrated Modelling and Enhanced Utilization of Power- to-Ammonia for High Renewable Penetrated Multi-Energy Systems,

    D. Xu et al., "Integrated Modelling and Enhanced Utilization of Power- to-Ammonia for High Renewable Penetrated Multi-Energy Systems," in IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 4769-4780, Nov. 2020

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Multi-Energy Scheduling of an Industrial Integrated Energy System by Reinforcement Learning-Based Differential Evolution,

    Z. Xu, G. Han, L. Liu, M. Martínez-García and Z. Wang, "Multi-Energy Scheduling of an Industrial Integrated Energy System by Reinforcement Learning-Based Differential Evolution," in IEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1077-1090, Sept. 2021

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    From Demand Response in Smart Grid Toward Integrated Demand Response in Smart Energy Hub,

    S. Bahrami and A. Sheikhi, "From Demand Response in Smart Grid Toward Integrated Demand Response in Smart Energy Hub," in IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 650-658, March 2016

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    Review and prospect of integrated demand response in the multi-energy system

    J. Wang, H. Zhong, Z. Ma, Q. Xia, C. Kang, “Review and prospect of integrated demand response in the multi-energy system”, Applied Energy, vol 202, pp. 772-782, 2017

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    A Review of the Evolution and Main Roles of Virtual Power Plants as Key Stakeholders in Power Systems,

    J. F. Venegas-Zarama, J. I. Muñoz-Hernandez, L. Baringo, P. Diaz- Cachinero and I. De Domingo-Mondejar, "A Review of the Evolution and Main Roles of Virtual Power Plants as Key Stakeholders in Power Systems," in IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 47937-47964, 2022

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Energy Pricing and Sharing Strategy Based on Hybrid Stochastic Robust Game Approach for a Virtual Energy Station With Energy Cells,

    S. Yin, Q. Ai, J. Li, Z. Li and S. Fan, "Energy Pricing and Sharing Strategy Based on Hybrid Stochastic Robust Game Approach for a Virtual Energy Station With Energy Cells," in IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 772-784, April 2021

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Aggregating Additional Flexibility From Quick-Start Devices for Multi-Energy Virtual Power Plants,

    H. Zhao, B. Wang, Z. Pan, H. Sun, Q. Guo and Y. Xue, "Aggregating Additional Flexibility From Quick-Start Devices for Multi-Energy Virtual Power Plants," in IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 646-658, Jan. 2021

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    Optimal Scheduling of the Integrated Electricity and Natural Gas Systems Considering the Integrated Demand Response of Energy Hubs,

    C. Shao, Y. Ding, P. Siano and Y. Song, "Optimal Scheduling of the Integrated Electricity and Natural Gas Systems Considering the Integrated Demand Response of Energy Hubs," in IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 4545-4553, Sept. 2021

    work page 2021

  10. [10]

    Bargaining-based cooperative energy trading for distribution company and demand response

    S. Fan, Q. Ai, L. Piao, “Bargaining-based cooperative energy trading for distribution company and demand response”, Applied Energy, vol 226, pp. 469-482, 2018, ISSN 0306-2619

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    Multi-Time Scale Optimal Scheduling of Regional Integrated Energy Systems Considering Integrated Demand Response

    H. Yang, M. Li, Z. Jiang and P. Zhang, "Multi-Time Scale Optimal Scheduling of Regional Integrated Energy Systems Considering Integrated Demand Response", in IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 5080-5090, 2020

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    Incentive-Based Integrated Demand Response for Multiple Energy Carriers Considering Behavioral Coupling Effect of Consumers,

    S. Zheng et al., "Incentive-Based Integrated Demand Response for Multiple Energy Carriers Considering Behavioral Coupling Effect of Consumers," in IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 3231-3245, July 2020

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    Application of Game Theory in Integrated Energy System Systems: A Review,

    J. He et al., "Application of Game Theory in Integrated Energy System Systems: A Review," in IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 93380-93397, 2020

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    Bargaining‐based cooperative game among multi‐aggregators with overlapping consumers in incentive‐based demand response,

    S. Zheng, Y. Sun, B. Li, B. Qi, K. Shi, Y. Li, and Y. Du, "Bargaining‐based cooperative game among multi‐aggregators with overlapping consumers in incentive‐based demand response," IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, vol. 14, pp. 1077-1090, 2020

    work page 2020

  15. [15]

    Exergoeconomic Analysis Methodology Based on Energy Level and Case Study,

    H. Qi, W. Han, N. Zhang, Z. Wang," Exergoeconomic Analysis Methodology Based on Energy Level and Case Study," Proceedings of the CSEE, vol. 36, pp. 3223-3231, 2016

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    Local electricity market designs for peer-to-peer trading: The role of battery flexibility,

    A. Lüth, J. M. Zepter, P. Crespo Del Granado, and R. Egging, "Local electricity market designs for peer-to-peer trading: The role of battery flexibility," Applied Energy, vol. 229, pp. 1233-1243, 2018

    work page 2018

  17. [17]

    Optimal Charge/Discharge Scheduling for Batteries in Energy Router-Based Microgrids of Prosumers via Peer-to-Peer Trading,

    B. Gu et al., "Optimal Charge/Discharge Scheduling for Batteries in Energy Router-Based Microgrids of Prosumers via Peer-to-Peer Trading," in IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1315-1328, July 2022

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Analysis and evaluation method of distributed energy supply system based on exergic economics

    J. Chen, H. Chen, S. Chen, et al., "Analysis and evaluation method of distributed energy supply system based on exergic economics”, Control Theory & Applications, 2022, 39(03): 553-560

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    Exergy cost allocation method based on energy level (ECAEL) for a CCHP system,

    Z. Wang, W. Han, N. Zhang, M. Liu, H. Jin, “Exergy cost allocation method based on energy level (ECAEL) for a CCHP system,” Energy, vol 134, pp. 240-247, 2017

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    Multi-objective planning for integrated energy systems considering both exergy efficiency and economy

    X Hu, H Zhang, D Chen, et al." Multi-objective planning for integrated energy systems considering both exergy efficiency and economy"．Energy, vol 197：117155,2020

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    Performance evaluation and optimization design of integrated energy system based on thermodynamic,exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental analyses

    L. Chen, K. Xiao, F. Hu, Y. Li, "Performance evaluation and optimization design of integrated energy system based on thermodynamic,exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental analyses". Applied Energy, vol 326:119987,2022

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Mechanism analysis and unified calculation model of exergy flow distribution in regional integrated energy system

    J Li, D Wang, H Jia, et al ． " Mechanism analysis and unified calculation model of exergy flow distribution in regional integrated energy system"．Applied Energy, vol 324：119725,2022

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Conventional and advanced exergy analysis of a grid connected underwater compressed air energy storage facility

    Ebrahimi M, Carriveau R, Ting D S K, et al． " Conventional and advanced exergy analysis of a grid connected underwater compressed air energy storage facility"．Applied Energy, vol 2019, 242：1198-1208

    work page 2019

  24. [24]

    Bi-level optimal scheduling of virtual energy station based on equal exergy replacement mechanism

    J. Ding, C. Gao, M. Song, X. Yan, T. Chen, “Bi-level optimal scheduling of virtual energy station based on equal exergy replacement mechanism”, Applied Energy, vol 327,120055,2022

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    The sharing economy: A pathway to sustainability or a nightmarish form of neoliberal capitalism?,

    C. J. Martin, "The sharing economy: A pathway to sustainability or a nightmarish form of neoliberal capitalism?," Ecological Economics, vol. 121, pp. 149-159, Jan 2016

    work page 2016

  26. [26]

    Applications of shared economy in smart grids: Shared energy storage and transactive energy,

    S. Meng, J. Meng,et al.“Applications of shared economy in smart grids: Shared energy storage and transactive energy,” The Electricity Journal, 35(5):1-6, 2022

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Data-Driven Game-Based Pricing for Sharing Rooftop Photovoltaic Generation and Energy Storage in the Residential Building Cluster Under Uncertainties,

    X. Xu et al., "Data-Driven Game-Based Pricing for Sharing Rooftop Photovoltaic Generation and Energy Storage in the Residential Building Cluster Under Uncertainties," in IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 4480-4491, July 2021

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    A Reputation Management System for the Fair Utilization of Community Energy Storage Systems,

    M. Houwing, I. Dukovska and N. G. Paterakis, "A Reputation Management System for the Fair Utilization of Community Energy Storage Systems," in IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 582-592, Jan. 2023

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    Adapted computational method of energy level and energy quality evolution for combined cooling， heating and power systems with energy storage units

    X Z Jiang，X Wang，L Feng，et al." Adapted computational method of energy level and energy quality evolution for combined cooling， heating and power systems with energy storage units." Energy，2017， 120：209-216

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    Thermal Battery Modeling of Inverter Air Conditioning for Demand Response,

    S. Meng, C. Gao, H. Yan and J. Yang, "Thermal Battery Modeling of Inverter Air Conditioning for Demand Response," in IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 5522-5534, Nov. 2018

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    Optimal scheduling strategy and benefit allocation of multiple virtual power plants based on general nash bargaining theory

    X Yan， C Gao， H Ming， et al． “Optimal scheduling strategy and benefit allocation of multiple virtual power plants based on general nash bargaining theory”．International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems，152：109218，2023

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    Economic Storage Sharing Framework ： Asymmetric Bargaining-Based Energy Cooperation

    S Cui ， Y Wang ， X Liu ， et al ． “Economic Storage Sharing Framework ： Asymmetric Bargaining-Based Energy Cooperation”． IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics， 2021， 17(11)：7489-7500．

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    Sequential Clearing of Network-aware Local Energy and Flexibility Markets in Community- based Grids,

    S. Talari, S. Birk, W. Ketter and T. Schneiders, "Sequential Clearing of Network-aware Local Energy and Flexibility Markets in Community- based Grids," in IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid

    work page

  34. [34]

    D Li， C Gao， T Chen， et al． Planning strategies of power-to-gas based on cooperative game and symbiosis cooperation[J] ． Applied Energy，2021，288：116639．

    work page 2021