Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Critical misalignments in climate pledges reveal imbalanced sustainable development pathways

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.17373 v2 pith:WFVZZWDE submitted 2025-03-12 physics.soc-ph econ.GNq-fin.EC

Francesca Larosa , Fermin Mallor , S. Hoyas , Alberto J. Conejero , Javier Garcia-Martinez , Francesco Fuso Nerini , Ricardo Vinuesa This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.soc-phecon.GNq-fin.EC
keywords climatedevelopmentsustainableinequalitysdgsacrossactionagenda
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We explore the integration of climate action and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in nationally determined contributions (NDCs), revealing persistent synergies and trade-offs across income groups. While high-income countries emphasize systemic challenges like health (SDG3) and inequality (SDG10), low-income nations prioritize the water-energy-food nexus (SDGs 6-7-12) and natural resource management (SDG15) due to vulnerabilities to climate impacts. Harnessing an innovative artificial intelligence routine, we discuss what these diverging development trajectories imply for the Paris Agreement and the 2030 Agenda for sustainable development in terms of global inequality, the climate and sustainable finance flows and multilateral governance.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools