Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 63 references

Arrayed waveguide gratings in lithium tantalate integrated photonics

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper establishes that thin-film lithium tantalate can host wafer-scale arrayed waveguide gratings with 100 GHz channel spacing, insertion loss below 4 dB, and crosstalk below -14 dB.

desk verdict Solid wafer-scale AWG demo on LiTaO3, but the headline specs don't match the measured means; the abstract overstates the numbers and should be fixed before citation. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.12917 v1 pith:4LE22YQL submitted 2025-04-17 physics.optics physics.app-ph

Shivaprasad U. Hulyal , Jianqi Hu , Chengli Wang , Jiachen Cai , Grigory Lihachev , Tobias J. Kippenberg This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.app-ph
keywords arrayedwaveguidegratingslithiumtantalateintegratedphotonicswafer-scalefabricationDUVlithographywavelengthdivisionmultiplexingferroelectricelectro-opticmodulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first wafer-scale fabrication of arrayed waveguide gratings (AWGs) on thin-film lithium tantalate, a ferroelectric whose optical anisotropy is about ten times smaller than lithium niobate's. The devices deliver 100 GHz channel spacing, insertion loss below 4 dB, and adjacent-channel crosstalk below -14 dB, and the paper also demonstrates a cyclic AWG and a multiplexing-demultiplexing AWG pair on this platform. The significance is that lithium tantalate can host both passive wavelength routing and high-speed electro-optic modulation on one chip, so volume-manufactured integrated WDM transmitters become feasible without the crystal-alignment tricks that lithium niobate designs require.

What carries the argument

The central object is the arrayed waveguide grating (AWG): an input star coupler that diffracts light into an array of waveguides carrying a constant incremental path-length difference $\Delta L$, followed by an output star coupler where wavelength-dependent interference focuses each channel onto a separate output port. The load-bearing material property is lithium tantalate's low optical anisotropy ($\Delta n = 0.004$), which allows the arrayed waveguides to be routed in arbitrary orientations without the phase errors that X-cut lithium niobate's birefringence would introduce. The fabrication chain carrying the claim is wafer-scale DUV lithography, a highly selective diamond-like-carbon hard mask, and a 300 nm partial etch that leaves a slab compatible with electro-optic modulators.

What would settle it

Fabricate the same 13-waveguide delay-line array as a standalone interferometer and directly measure the relative phase of each arm with a narrow-linewidth laser; if the inter-waveguide phase errors exceed about 0.1 radian at the design wavelength, the reported crosstalk below -14 dB cannot be reproduced, and the claim that the design survives wafer-scale fabrication would be overturned.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the reduced birefringence of thin-film lithium tantalate ($\Delta n \approx 0.004$ versus about $-0.07$ for lithium niobate) eliminates the need for rotational or other anisotropy-compensating layouts in AWG design. Using 248 nm DUV stepper lithography with a diamond-like-carbon hard mask and ion-beam etching, the authors manufacture 1 × 8 AWGs at 100 GHz channel spacing in both Confocal and Rowland star-coupler configurations, with the performance cited above, and verify reproducibility across multiple fields of a 4-inch wafer. The same platform already supports high-speed electro-optic modulators, which positions the AWG as a drop-in building block for fully integrated wavelength-division-multiplexing transmitters.

Load-bearing premise

The claimed performance assumes the wafer-scale etch is uniform enough that the phase delays in all 13 arrayed waveguides match the design's effective-index model; if etch depth or sidewall roughness varies too much, the crosstalk and channel-spacing numbers change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • AWGs can be co-integrated with high-speed electro-optic modulators on the same lithium tantalate chip, enabling dense WDM transmitters without anisotropy-compensating layouts.
  • The 100 GHz channel spacing aligns with the ITU grid, so the devices can drop into standard telecom wavelength plans.
  • The cyclic AWG behaviour enables colourless wavelength routing and optical add-drop multiplexers on a ferroelectric platform.
  • The multiplexing-demultiplexing pair shows that cascaded spectral routing works, a prerequisite for multi-stage photonic circuits.
  • Wafer-scale DUV manufacturing points to a cost structure that can move AWGs from research cleanrooms to volume production.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the phase-error budget holds at larger scale, the same design should extend to 100-channel AWGs or 50 GHz spacing, turning the 13-waveguide demonstration into a platform capability claim.
  • The measured channel spacing overshooting its nominal value (106.7 GHz Confocal, 116.5 GHz Rowland) suggests a systematic effective-index offset that a design correction could tighten.
  • Pairing these AWGs with the electro-optic frequency combs already shown in lithium tantalate could produce fully on-chip comb-based spectrometers or microwave-photonics filters.
  • The uniformity across wafer fields makes lithium tantalate a candidate for co-packaged optics, where many identical AWGs on one chip serve multiple transceiver lanes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the design, wafer-scale fabrication, and optical characterization of arrayed waveguide gratings (AWGs) in thin-film lithium tantalate (LiTaO3). Two star-coupler geometries (Confocal and Rowland) are implemented via 248-nm DUV lithography and ion-beam etching on a 4-inch LTOI wafer. The authors report measured insertion losses of 6.14 dB (Confocal) and 3.16 dB (Rowland), adjacent-channel crosstalk of -13.38 dB and -14.67 dB, and channel spacings of 106.73 and 116.46 GHz, respectively. They further present a cyclic AWG design and a cascaded multiplexer/demultiplexer pair. The paper argues that LiTaO3's low anisotropy simplifies AWG design relative to LiNbO3 and that wafer-scale DUV fabrication paves the way for volume-manufactured ferroelectric WDM transmitters.

Significance. If the stated results are taken with the corrections below, this work is a useful contribution: it is, to my knowledge, one of the first demonstrations of AWGs in thin-film LiTaO3, with a clear fabrication route (DUV stepper, DLC hardmask, IBE) and comb-calibrated spectral measurements. The wafer-scale statistics across multiple fields are valuable, and the passive mux/demux cascade is a practical step toward integrated ferroelectric transmitters. The strengths include the low propagation loss (κ0/2π = 32.7 MHz, 5.95 dB/m), the use of a standard analytic AWG model with FDTD-verified star couplers, and the reproducible results across chips. However, the paper's headline quantitative claims overstate the measured data, and one of the three headline contributions (the cyclic AWG) is not backed by a direct measurement. These issues are correctable and do not invalidate the core fabrication and characterization effort.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section IV and abstract] The abstract states that the fabricated AWGs feature a channel spacing of 100 GHz, insertion loss < 4 dB, and crosstalk < -14 dB, but the Section IV statistics for the Confocal configuration are 106.73 ± 8.38 GHz, 6.14 ± 0.72 dB, and -13.38 ± 1.64 dB, and for the Rowland configuration are 116.46 ± 13.58 GHz, 3.16 ± 0.35 dB, and -14.67 ± 1.25 dB. Neither configuration achieves a 100 GHz spacing, only the Rowland mean meets the loss and crosstalk thresholds, and the crosstalk threshold is within one standard deviation of the mean. The abstract and conclusion should be reworded to report the measured per-configuration values and to state explicitly that 100 GHz is the design target, not the measured value.
  2. [Section IV, Figure 3h] The abstract claims the authors 'demonstrate a cyclic AWG', but the only evidence for cyclic behavior is the schematic in Figure 3h; no measured spectrum over multiple free spectral ranges or port-recycling data is shown. The text states that the Rowland AWG 'exhibits the characteristics' of a cyclic AWG, which appears to be inferred from the periodic transmission envelope rather than demonstrated. Please provide a direct measurement of cyclic operation (e.g., transmission at ports separated by one FSR) or remove the 'demonstrate' claim.
  3. [Section IV and Supplementary Eqs. 12-14] The claim that 'the measured results are in good agreement with the simulated spectra' is not quantified. The measured channel spacing deviates from the 100 GHz design by +6.7% (Confocal) and +16.5% (Rowland). Since the channel spacing is set by the path-length increment and group index (Supplementary Eqs. 12-14), this systematic offset implies a material or fabrication parameter error that should be identified and discussed (e.g., group-index miscalibration, etch-depth variation, or thermal effects). The manuscript should also state how this offset relates to the phase coherence that sets the crosstalk, since a random phase-error contribution large enough to shift the spacing would degrade crosstalk below the reported values. At minimum, overlay simulated and measured spectra.
  4. [Conclusion, ref. [48]] The note at the end of the Conclusion states that another competing paper [48] was published during preparation, but the manuscript does not state what [48] reports or how the present work differs. Because the abstract and introduction claim 'for the first time' for AWGs on LiTaO3 and 'for the first time at wafer scale on a ferroelectric material platform', the authors must explicitly compare their results with [48] and justify the novelty claims. Without this, the reader cannot evaluate the priority claim.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section III] The phrase 'The double layer tapers are designed to enhance the transmission efficiency (3.7 dB fiber-to-fiber)' is ambiguous: 3.7 dB appears to be a coupling loss, not an enhancement. Please rephrase to state that the tapers reduce the fiber-to-fiber coupling loss to 3.7 dB.
  2. [Section IV] State whether the quoted insertion losses are fiber-to-fiber or on-chip, and over which wavelength range they apply.
  3. [Conclusion] The conclusion says 'channel spacing around 100GHz', which is inconsistent with the abstract's '100 GHz'; unify the wording to reflect the measured values.
  4. [Supplementary section 1] The text above Eq. (7) contains a typo ('pahse' should be 'phase').
  5. [Supplementary Eq. (4)] The symbol n_s is used without definition; define it as the slab index or otherwise clarify.
  6. [Figure 1b] The caption should clarify that the effective indices are calculated for the partially etched rib waveguide with the specific 300 nm etch depth, and indicate which mode is TE0.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: AWG performance is derived from a forward analytic/FDTD model and independently measured without fitting.

full rationale

The paper's design chain starts from standard AWG equations (Supplementary Eqs. (1)-(16)) and FDTD simulations (Fig. 1d-e), then fabricates with DUV/IBE and measures spectra (Figs. 3e, 3g, S2). No measured AWG spectrum is used to calibrate the effective index, group index, path-length increment, or any other parameter that is later reported as a prediction; the channel spacing, insertion loss, and crosstalk are read off directly from calibrated, comb-referenced transmission measurements. The analytic simulation is a forward model: input Gaussian field, Fresnel diffraction, waveguide coupling, phase accumulation, and output interference (Supplementary Eqs. (1)-(10)), and the device parameters (Table S1) are fixed before fabrication. Therefore the predicted spectra are not equivalent to the measured outputs by construction. The self-citations (e.g., [12] for the LiTaO3 platform and DLC hardmask, and [32] for EO combs) provide independent prior experimental evidence of the fabrication platform and related components; they are not invoked as a uniqueness theorem and they do not force the AWG result. The abstract's 100 GHz/<4 dB/<-14 dB summary is looser than the wafer-averaged statistics (e.g., Confocal mean spacing 106.7 GHz and IL 6.14 dB), but that is a reporting/accuracy concern, not circularity. Overall, the central claim rests on independent measurements of fabricated devices, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to the measured transmission spectra. The design parameters in Table S1 (diffraction order m=160, path increment 129-130 um, 13 waveguides, widths 1.6/1.8 um) are chosen analytically before fabrication, and the paper validates that design by measurement. The listed axioms are the standard physical and fabrication assumptions on which the demonstration rests.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Gaussian approximation for the fundamental waveguide mode and scalar Fresnel diffraction in the star couplers (SI Eqs. 1-5).
    The design and simulated spectra are computed from this standard AWG model.
  • domain assumption Effective-index and group-index model for the partially etched LiTaO3 waveguide, assuming the TE0 mode is the guided channel at 1.6-1.8 um widths (Fig. 1b-c).
    Simulation and phase-delay calculations rely on these indices; multimode operation is assumed not to cause mode mixing.
  • domain assumption LiTaO3 anisotropy is small enough (Delta n = 0.004) that no crystal-axis alignment is needed for the AWG design (Introduction).
    This is the physical premise behind the simpler layout and is supported by cited material data, but it is an input assumption for the design.
  • domain assumption The fabricated etch depth of about 300 nm and DUV-patterned sidewalls yield phase errors small enough that the designed inter-channel crosstalk is preserved (Sections III-IV).
    The performance claim depends on fabrication fidelity, which is demonstrated by measurement but not derived.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Arrayed waveguide gratings in lithium tantalate integrated photonics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4LE22YQL

@misc{pith2026250412917,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Arrayed waveguide gratings in lithium tantalate integrated photonics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4LE22YQL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.12917}
}
abstract

Arrayed Waveguide Gratings (AWGs) are widely used photonic components for splitting and combining different wavelengths of light. They play a key role in wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) systems by enabling efficient routing of multiple data channels over a single optical fiber and as a building block for various optical signal processing, computing, imaging, and spectroscopic applications. Recently, there has been growing interest in integrating AWGs in ferroelectric material platforms, as the platform simultaneously provide efficient electro-optic modulation capability and thus hold the promise for fully integrated WDM transmitters. To date, several demonstrations have been made in the X-cut thin-film lithium niobate ($\mathrm{LiNbO}_3$) platform, yet, the large anisotropy of $\mathrm{LiNbO}_3$ complicates the design and degrades the performance of the AWGs. To address this limitation, we use the recently developed photonic integrated circuits (PICs) based on thin-film lithium tantalate ($\mathrm{LiTaO}_3$), a material with a similar Pockels coefficient as $\mathrm{LiNbO}_3$ but significantly reduced optical anisotropy, as an alternative viable platform. In this work, we manufacture $\mathrm{LiTaO}_3$ AWGs using deep ultraviolet lithography on a wafer-scale. The fabricated AWGs feature a channel spacing of 100 GHz, an insertion loss of < 4 dB and crosstalk of < -14 dB. In addition, we demonstrate a cyclic AWG, as well as a multiplexing and demultiplexing AWG pair for the first time on $\mathrm{LiTaO}_3$ platform. The wafer-scale fabrication of these AWGs not only ensures uniformity and reproducibility, but also paves the way for realizing volume-manufactured integrated WDM transmitters in ferroelectric photonic integrated platforms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.12917 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Design and simulation of arrayed waveguide gratings based on LiTaO3 photonic integrated circuits. (a) Schematic diagram of the AWG. The inset shows the material stack. (b) Refractive index of various modes supported by partially etched LiTaO3 waveguide. (c) Effective indices and the change in refractive indices at different waveguide widths of the TE0 mode on LiTaO3 waveguide. (d) (left panel) Simulation of light di… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Wafer-scale manufacturing of LTOI arrayed waveguide gratings. (a) Optical image of a 4-inch wafer of LiTaO3 integrated AWG following the fabrication processes. (b) Photo of the photonic chip comprising of the fabricated Confocal type configuration AWG. False-colored Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) images of the arrayed aperture spacing, (c) arrayed waveguide aperture, (d) Double layered tapers. (e) Normalized res… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Characterization of fabricated LiTaO3 arrayed waveguide gratings. (a) DUV stepper exposure layout. (b) The reticle design containing eight chips is uniformly exposed in discrete fields over a 4-inch wafer. (c) Photonic image of the fabricated chip containing five confocal 8-channel 100 GHz AWGs in a single chip. (d) Microscopic image of fabricated Confocal output star coupler. (e) Transmission spectrum of the 8-chan… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Demonstration of multiplexing demultiplexing using arrayed waveguide grating pair. (a) Microscope image of the fabricated (Device ID: D197_F6_C7_WG_305) passive cascaded configuration of two AWGs demonstrating spectral routing. The five outputs of the left AWG are dire…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [48]

    K. Ye, H. Feng, R. t. Morsche, A. Mishra, Y. Klaver, C. Wei, Z. Zheng, A. Keloth, A. T. Işık, Z. Chen,et al., Brillouin photonics engine in the thin-film lithium nio- bate platform, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.06599 (2024)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    Chandrasekhar, M

    S. Chandrasekhar, M. Zirngibl, A. Dentai, C. Joyner, F. Storz, C. Burrus, and L. Lunardi, Monolithic eight- wavelength demultiplexed receiver for dense wdm ap- plications, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters7, 1342 (1995)

    work page 1995

  3. [3]

    A. J. Metcalf, H.-J. Kim, D. E. Leaird, J. A. Jaramillo- Villegas, K. A. McKinzie, V. Lal, A. Hosseini, G. E. Hoe- fler, F. Kish, and A. M. Weiner, Integrated line-by-line optical pulse shaper for high-fidelity and rapidly recon- figurable rf-filtering, Optics Express24, 23925 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Cheng, C

    J. Cheng, C. Li, J. Dai, Y. Chu, X. Niu, X. Dong, and J.-J. He, Direct optical convolution computing based on arrayed waveguide grating router, Laser & Photonics Re- views 18, 2301221 (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    E. A. Rank, R. Sentosa, D. J. Harper, M. Salas, A. Gaugutz, D. Seyringer, S. Nevlacsil, A. Maese-Novo, M. Eggeling, P. Muellner, et al., Toward optical coher- ence tomography on a chip: in vivo three-dimensional human retinal imaging using photonic integrated circuit- based arrayed waveguide gratings, Light: Science & Ap- plications 10, 6 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Gatkine, S

    P. Gatkine, S. Veilleux, Y. Hu, J. Bland-Hawthorn, and M. Dagenais, Arrayed waveguide grating spectrometers forastronomicalapplications: newresults,Opticsexpress 25, 17918 (2017)

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    Prost, G

    M. Prost, G. Liu, and S. B. Yoo, A compact thin-film lithium niobate platform with arrayed waveguide grat- ings and MMIs, in 2018 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exposition (OFC) (IEEE, 2018) pp. 1–3

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Y. Yu, Z. Yu, Z. Zhang, H. K. Tsang, and X. Sun, Wavelength-division multiplexing on an etchless lithium niobate integrated platform, ACS Photonics 9, 3253 (2022)

    work page 2022

Show all 63 references
  1. [9]

    Z. Wang, Z. Fang, Z. Liu, Y. Liang, J. Liu, J. Yu, T. Huang, Y. Zhou, H. Zhang, M. Wang, and Y. Cheng, On-Chip Arrayed Waveguide Grating Fabricated on Thin-Film Lithium Niobate, Advanced Photonics Re- search 5, 2300228 (2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    H. Tu, Y. Zhang, G. Li, X. Dai, Y. Wu, Y. Zhang, H. Li, Q. Lu, M. Lu, and W. Guo, 100-Channel Arrayed Waveg- uide Grating Based on Thin Film Lithium Niobate on Insulator (LNOI), Journal of Lightwave Technology42, 4519 (2024)

    2024

  3. [11]

    Yi et al., Anisotropy-free arrayed waveguide gratings on X-cut thin film lithium niobate platform of in-plane anisotropy, Light: Science & Applications13, 147 (2024)

    J. Yi et al., Anisotropy-free arrayed waveguide gratings on X-cut thin film lithium niobate platform of in-plane anisotropy, Light: Science & Applications13, 147 (2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    Z. Wang, Z. Fang, Y. Zhu, J. Liu, L. Gao, J. Yu, H. Zhang, M. Wang, and Y. Cheng, An electro-optically tunablearrayed waveguidegrating fabricated onthin film lithium niobate, APL Photonics10 (2025)

    2025

  5. [13]

    C. Wang, Z. Li, J. Riemensberger, G. Lihachev, M. Chu- raev, W. Kao, X. Ji, J. Zhang, T. Blesin, A. Davydova, Y. Chen, K. Huang, X. Wang, X. Ou, and T. J. Kippen- berg, Lithium tantalate photonic integrated circuits for volume manufacturing, Nature629, 784 (2024)

    2024

  6. [14]

    H. Hu, F. Da Ros, M. Pu, F. Ye, K. Ingerslev, E. Porto da Silva, M.Nooruzzaman, Y.Amma, Y.Sasaki, T.Mizuno, et al., Single-source chip-based frequency comb enabling extreme parallel data transmission, Nature Photonics12, 469 (2018)

    2018

  7. [15]

    Picqué and T

    N. Picqué and T. W. Hänsch, Frequency comb spec- troscopy, Nature Photonics13, 146 (2019)

    2019

  8. [16]

    Feldmann, N

    J. Feldmann, N. Youngblood, M. Karpov, H. Gehring, 7 X. Li, M. Stappers, M. Le Gallo, X. Fu, A. Lukashchuk, A. S. Raja, et al., Parallel convolutional processing us- ing an integrated photonic tensor core, Nature589, 52 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Ishio, J

    H. Ishio, J. Minowa, and K. Nosu, Review and status of wavelength-division-multiplexing technology and its ap- plication, Journal of lightwave technology2, 448 (1984)

    1984

  10. [18]

    Smit and C

    M. Smit and C. Van Dam, PHASAR-based WDM- devices: Principles, design and applications, IEEE Jour- nal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 2, 236 (1996)

    1996

  11. [19]

    M. K. Smit, New focusing and dispersive planar compo- nent based on an optical phased array, Electronics letters 24, 385 (1988)

    1988

  12. [20]

    Sano and T

    Y. Sano and T. Yoshino, Fast optical wavelength in- terrogator employing arrayed waveguide grating fordis- tributed fiber bragg grating sensors, Journal of Lightwave Technology 21, 132 (2003)

    2003

  13. [21]

    Himeno, K

    A. Himeno, K. Kato, and T. Miya, Silica-based planar lightwave circuits, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 4, 913 (1998)

    1998

  14. [22]

    N. A. Yebo, W. Bogaerts, Z. Hens, and R. Baets, On- Chip Arrayed Waveguide Grating Interrogated Silicon- on-Insulator Microring Resonator-Based Gas Sensor, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters23, 1505 (2011)

    2011

  15. [23]

    Piels, J

    M. Piels, J. F. Bauters, M. L. Davenport, M. J. R. Heck, and J. E. Bowers, Low-Loss Silicon Nitride AWG Demultiplexer Heterogeneously Integrated With Hy- brid III–V/Silicon Photodetectors, Journal of Lightwave Technology 32, 817 (2014)

    2014

  16. [24]

    N. Keil, H. Yao, C. Zawadzki, J. Bauer, M. Bauer, C. Dreyer, and J. Schneider, Athermal polarization- independent all-polymer arrayed waveguide grating (awg) multi/demultiplexer, in Optical Fiber Communi- cation Conference (Optica Publishing Group, 2001) p. PD7

    2001

  17. [25]

    Barbarin, X

    Y. Barbarin, X. Leijtens, E. Bente, C. Louzao, J. Kooiman, and M. Smit, Extremely small awg demulti- plexer fabricated on inp by using a double-etch process, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters16, 2478 (2004)

    2004

  18. [26]

    D. Zhu, L. Shao, M. Yu, R. Cheng, B. Desiatov, C. Xin, Y. Hu, J. Holzgrafe, S. Ghosh, A. Shams-Ansari,et al., Integrated photonics on thin-film lithium niobate, Ad- vances in Optics and Photonics13, 242 (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    A. Boes, L. Chang, C. Langrock, M. Yu, M. Zhang, Q. Lin, M. Lončar, M. Fejer, J. Bowers, and A. Mitchell, Lithium niobate photonics: Unlocking the electromag- netic spectrum, Science379, eabj4396 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    C. Wang, M. Zhang, X. Chen, M. Bertrand, A. Shams- Ansari, S. Chandrasekhar, P. Winzer, and M. Lončar, Integrated lithium niobate electro-optic modulators op- erating at CMOS-compatible voltages, Nature562, 101 (2018)

    2018

  21. [29]

    M. Xu, Y. Zhu, F. Pittalà, J. Tang, M. He, W. C. Ng, J. Wang, Z. Ruan, X. Tang, M. Kuschnerov,et al., Dual- polarization thin-film lithium niobate in-phase quadra- ture modulators for terabit-per-second transmission, Op- tica 9, 61 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    Ballandras, E

    S. Ballandras, E. Courjon, F. Bernard, T. Laroche, A. Clairet, I. Radu, I. Huyet, A. Drouin, and E. Butaud, New generation of saw devices on advanced engineered substrates combining piezoelectric single crystals and sil- icon, in2019 Joint Conference of the IEEE International ...

    2019

  23. [31]

    C. Wang, D. Fang, J. Zhang, A. Kotz, G. Lihachev, M. Churaev, Z. Li, A. Schwarzenberger, X. Ou, C. Koos, et al., Ultrabroadband thin-film lithium tantalate mod- ulator for high-speed communications, Optica11, 1614 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Powell, X

    K. Powell, X. Li, D. Assumpcao, L. Magalhães, N. Sin- clair, and M. Lončar, Dc-stable electro-optic modula- tors using thin-film lithium tantalate, Optics Express32, 44115 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    Zhang, C

    J. Zhang, C. Wang, C. Denney, J. Riemensberger, G. Li- hachev, J. Hu, W. Kao, T. Blésin, N. Kuznetsov, Z. Li, M. Churaev, X. Ou, G. Santamaria-Botello, and T. J. Kippenberg, Ultrabroadband integrated electro-optic fre- quency comb in lithium tantalate, Nature 637, 1096 (2025)

    2025

  26. [34]

    Dragone, An N*N optical multiplexer using a planar arrangement of two star couplers, IEEE Photonics Tech- nology Letters 3, 812 (2002)

    C. Dragone, An N*N optical multiplexer using a planar arrangement of two star couplers, IEEE Photonics Tech- nology Letters 3, 812 (2002)

    2002

  27. [35]

    Muñoz and J

    P. Muñoz and J. Capmany, Modeling and Design of Ar- rayed Waveguide Gratings, Journal of Lightwave Tech- nology 20 (2002)

    2002

  28. [36]

    Zhang, C.-S

    H.-M. Zhang, C.-S. Ma, Z.-K. Qin, X.-Z. Zhang, Dan- Zhang, S.-Y. Liu, and D.-M. Zhang, Reduction of side- wall roughness, insertion loss and crosstalk of polymer ar- rayed waveguide grating using vapor-redissolution tech- nique, Thin Solid Films515, 7313 (2007)

    2007

  29. [37]

    T. Ye, Y. Fu, L. Qiao, and T. Chu, Low-crosstalk Si arrayed waveguide grating with parabolic tapers, Opt. Express 22, 31899 (2014), publisher: Optica Publishing Group

    2014

  30. [38]

    X. Ji, J. Liu, J. He, R. N. Wang, Z. Qiu, J. Riemens- berger, and T. J. Kippenberg, Compact, spatial-mode- interaction-free, ultralow-loss, nonlinear photonic inte- grated circuits, Communications Physics5, 84 (2022)

    2022

  31. [39]

    C. Wang, D. Fang, J. Zhang, A. Kotz, G. Lihachev, M. Churaev, Z. Li, A. Schwarzenberger, X. Ou, C. Koos, and T. J. Kippenberg, Ultrabroadband thin-film lithium tantalate modulator for high-speed communications, Op- tica 11, 1614 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    J. Liu, V. Brasch, M. H. Pfeiffer, A. Kordts, A. N. Kamel, H. Guo, M. Geiselmann, and T. J. Kippen- berg,Frequency-comb-assistedbroadbandprecisionspec- troscopy with cascaded diode lasers, Optics Letters41, 3134 (2016)

    2016

  33. [41]

    Seyringer,Arrayed Waveguide Gratings (SPIE, 2016)

    D. Seyringer,Arrayed Waveguide Gratings (SPIE, 2016)

    2016

  34. [42]

    Dragone, Efficient N*N star couplers using Fourier optics, Journal of Lightwave Technology7, 479 (1989)

    C. Dragone, Efficient N*N star couplers using Fourier optics, Journal of Lightwave Technology7, 479 (1989)

    1989

  35. [43]

    Zhang, B

    M. Zhang, B. Buscaino, C. Wang, A. Shams-Ansari, C. Reimer, R. Zhu, J. M. Kahn, and M. Lončar, Broadband electro-optic frequency comb generation in a lithium niobate microring resonator, Nature568, 373 (2019)

    2019

  36. [44]

    M. Yu, D. Barton III, R. Cheng, C. Reimer, P. Kharel, L. He, L. Shao, D. Zhu, Y. Hu, H. R. Grant,et al., Inte- grated femtosecond pulse generator on thin-film lithium niobate, Nature 612, 252 (2022)

    2022

  37. [45]

    Riemensberger, A

    J. Riemensberger, A. Lukashchuk, M. Karpov, W. Weng, E.Lucas, J.Liu,andT.J.Kippenberg,Massivelyparallel coherent laser ranging using a soliton microcomb, Nature 581, 164 (2020)

    2020

  38. [46]

    J. M. Lukens and P. Lougovski, Frequency-encoded pho- tonicqubitsforscalablequantuminformationprocessing, Optica 4, 8 (2016). 8

    2016

  39. [47]

    S. Liu, R. Ma, W. Wang, Z. Yu, and D. Dai, Ultra- compact thin-film-lithium-niobate photonic chip for dis- persion compensation, Nanophotonics13, 4723 (2024)

    2024

  40. [49]

    Huang, X

    F. Huang, X. Shen, S. Wang, H. Xu, H. Liu, Z. Wang, H. Gao, X. Yao, H. Cao, B. Chen, X. Wang, J. Zhang, Z. Wu, M. Zhu, H. Xiong, W. Zhao, H. Li, Z. Yu, L. Liu, Y. Shi, and D. Dai, Toward Large-Scale Pho- tonic Chips Using Low-Anisotropy Thin-Film Lithium- Tantalate, Advanced S...

    2025

  41. [50]

    Input Field as a Gaussian Beam 2 B

    Analytic simulation of AWG 2 A. Input Field as a Gaussian Beam 2 B. Propagation via Fresnel Diffraction 3 C. Coupling into Arrayed Waveguides 3 D. Phase Accumulation in Arrayed Waveguides 3 E. Interference in the Output Star Coupler 3

  42. [51]

    Device parameters selection 4

  43. [52]

    Parabolic taper design 5

  44. [53]

    Wafer scale characterization of AWG 5

  45. [54]

    Double Layer Taper design for AWG 5 arXiv:2504.12917v1 [physics.optics] 17 Apr 2025 2

    2025 arXiv

  46. [55]

    Analytical simulation of AWG for the center channel

    Analytic simulation of A WG −4 −2 0 2 4 −30 -20 -10 0 Transmission (dB) Electric field distribution at output waveguide Field at output Output waveguide response −2.0 −1.5 −1.0 −0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 0 5 10 15 20 25Field amplitude (a.u,) Input field Input 1/e Level: 10.02 x ...

  47. [56]

    A larger number of arrayed waveguides reduces the bandwidth of the individual channels whereas a larger gap between the adjacent arrayed waveguides increases the insertion loss

    Device parameters selection The radius (Ra) of the input grating circle is chosen to accommodate the total number of arrayed waveguides which can be hence calculated as, Ra = daN θda (11) where da is the spacing between the arrayed waveguides and θda is the width of the Gaussi...

  48. [57]

    Parabolic taper design Within the AWG framework, the implementation of adiabatic tapers is an effective strategy to minimize coupling losses between single-mode waveguides and the free propagation region (FPR), thereby enhancing overall device performance. Here we employ a par...

  49. [58]

    Wafer scale characterization of A WG We characterized the AWGs across multiple chips and fields on the wafer, with the results presented in Figure S2. For the Confocal AWGs, we measured an average insertion loss of 5.02 ± 1.06 dB, 3-dB bandwidth of 103.75 ± 9.80 GHz, adjacent ...

  50. [59]

    In this design, the waveguide width is linearly reduced from the standard width to 0.16 µm over a length of 160 µm

    Double Layer Taper design for A WG Efficient optical coupling between the LiTaO3 waveguide and the mode from the lensed fiber is achieved using double- layered waveguide tapers. In this design, the waveguide width is linearly reduced from the standard width to 0.16 µm over a l...

  51. [60]

    Parker and S

    M. Parker and S. Walker, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 5, 1379 (1999)

    1999

  52. [61]

    Smit and C

    M. Smit and C. Van Dam, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 2, 236 (1996)

    1996

  53. [62]

    T. Ye, Y. Fu, L. Qiao, and T. Chu, Opt. Express 22, 31899 (2014), publisher: Optica Publishing Group

    2014

  54. [63]

    Zhang, Y

    Z. Zhang, Y. Wang, and H. K. Tsang, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics 56, 1 (2020)

    2020

  55. [64]

    M. W. Puckett and N. A. Krueger, Applied Optics 60, 4340 (2021). 7 Figure S4. FDTD simulations of double layer taper. Electric field distribution showing the coupling of the mode from lensed fiber to the slab and then to the waveguide

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.