pith. sign in

arxiv: 2504.20852 · v2 · pith:RPHIYNQTnew · submitted 2025-04-29 · ⚛️ physics.ao-ph

Machine Learning (ML)-Physics Fusion Model Outperforms Both Physics-Only and ML-Only Models in Typhoon Predictions

classification ⚛️ physics.ao-ph
keywords fuxi-shtmintensitycomparedfuxityphoonhybridmodelmodels
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Data-driven machine learning (ML) models, such as FuXi, exhibit notable limitations in forecasting typhoon intensity and structure. This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of FuXi-SHTM, a hybrid ML-physics model, using all 2024 western North Pacific typhoon cases. The FuXi-SHTM hybrid demonstrates clear improvements in both track and intensity forecasts compared to the standalone SHTM, FuXi, and ECMWF HRES models. Compared to FuXi alone, FuXi-SHTM reduces typhoon track forecast errors by 16.5% and 5.2% at lead times of 72 h and 120 h, respectively, and reduces intensity forecast errors by 59.7% and 47.6%. Furthermore, FuXi-SHTM simulates cloud structures more realistically compared to SHTM, and achieves superior representation of the 10-m wind fields in both intensity and spatial structure compared to FuXi and SHTM. Increasing the resolution of FuXi-SHTM from 9 km to 3 km further enhances intensity forecasts, highlighting the critical role of the resolution of the physical model in advancing hybrid forecasting capabilities.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.