Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 43 references

A regularity theory for evolution equations with space-time anisotropic non-local operators in mixed-norm Sobolev spaces

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that time-fractional evolution equations driven by sums of anisotropic non-local operators are well-posed in mixed-norm Sobolev spaces, and identifies the sharp Besov class of initial data.

desk verdict Genuinely new anisotropic time-fractional maximal regularity with the heavy lifting written out, but the optimal initial-data half leans on an unchecked import from the authors' own trace framework that a referee must verify. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.00984 v1 pith:RXPT2ZJY submitted 2025-05-02 math.AP math.PR

Jae-Hwan Choi , Jaehoon Kang , Daehan Park , Jinsol Seo This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath.PR MSC 26A3335S1047G2030H2546B7046E35
keywords Space-timenon-localequationAnisotropicoperatorCaputofractionalderivativeSubordinateBrownianmotionInitialvalueproblemGeneralizedrealinterpolationTracetheoremMixed-normSobolevspaces
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper develops a regularity theory for the equation \(\partial_t^\$\alpha$ u=\sum_{i=1}^{\ell}\varphi_i(\Delta_{x_i})u+f\) posed on \((0,T)\times\mathbb R^d\), where each \(\varphi_i\) is a Bernstein function and the spatial operator is the generator of an independent array of subordinate Brownian motions. Its main theorem states that, under a weak lower scaling condition on the \(\varphi_i\), the initial-value problem is well posed in the mixed-norm space \(L_q((0,T);L_p)\) for every \(11\), the theorem identifies the optimal initial-data class as the anisotropic Besov space \($B^{{\vec\varphi,\gamma+2-2/(\alpha q)}}$_{p,q}\); when \(\$\alpha$ q\le1\), nontrivial initial data are absorbed by the forcing term and the natural problem has zero data. This matters because it gives a sharp Sobolev-scale answer for space-time non-local equations whose spatial part has different fractional orders in different coordinate directions, such as \((\Delta_x)^{\beta_1/2}+(\Delta_y)^{\beta_2/2}\).

What carries the argument

The argument runs through the transition semigroup of the stochastic process generated by the equation. The spatial operator \(\sum_{i=1}^{\ell}\varphi_i(\Delta_{x_i})\) is the generator of an independent array of subordinate Brownian motions \(\vec X_t\), and the Caputo fractional derivative is realized by time-changing that process with the inverse \(R_t\) of an \(\$\alpha$\)-stable subordinator. The fundamental solution is \(q(t,\vec x)=\int_0^\infty p(r,\vec x)\$\varphi$(t,r)\,dr\), the transition density of \(\vec X_{R_t}\), and the solution of the zero-data Cauchy problem is represented by \(u(t,\vec x)=\int_0^t\int_{\mathbb R^d}$D_t^{{1-\alpha}}$q(t-s,\vec x-\vec y)f(s,\vec y)\,d\vec y\,ds\). The paper's central technical object is the upper bound in Theorem 3.2 for derivatives of \(q_{\$\alpha$,\$\beta$}\), a coordinate-hierarchical kernel estimate that replaces the coordinate-wise product bound available in the parabolic case. On the function-space side, a modified Littlewood–Paley projection \(\$Delta_j^{{\vec\varphi}}$\) built from level sets of the anisotropic symbol \(m_{\vec\varphi}(\xi)=\sum_i\varphi_i(|\xi_i|^2)\) identifies the initial-data space as the generalized real interpolation space \(($H^{{\vec\varphi,\gamma+2}}$_p,$H^{{\vec\varphi,\gamma}}$_p)_{\psi,q}\) with \(\psi(t)=$t^{{1/(\alpha q)}}$\), namely \($B^{{\vec\varphi,\gamma+2-2/(\alpha q)}}$_{p,q}\).

What would settle it

For the model operator \((\Delta_x)^{\beta_1/2}+(\Delta_y)^{\beta_2/2}\) with \(\$\alpha$ q>1\), choose \(u_0\) in the rougher Besov space \($B^{{\vec\varphi,\gamma+2-2/(\alpha q)-\varepsilon}}$_{p,q}\setminus $B^{{\vec\varphi,\gamma+2-2/(\alpha q)}}$_{p,q}\). If the explicit kernel construction produces a solution with both \(\partial_t^\$\alpha$ u\) and \(\sum_i\varphi_i(\Delta_{x_i})u\) in \(L_q((0,T);L_p)\), the claimed sharpness is false; the theorem predicts no such solution exists.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Under Assumption 2.1 (weak lower scaling for the Bernstein functions \(\varphi_i\)), the paper establishes Theorem 2.10: for \(1<p,q<\infty\), \(\gamma\in\mathbb R\), \(T<\infty\), every \(f\in $H^{{\vec\varphi,\gamma}}$_{q,p}(T)\) and every \(u_0\in $B^{{\vec\varphi,\gamma+2-2/(\alpha q)}}$_{p,q}\) when \(\$\alpha$ q>1\), the equation \(\partial_t^\$\alpha$ u=\vec\varphi\cdot\Delta_{\vec d}u+f\) with \(u(0)=1_{\$\alpha$ q>1}u_0\) has a unique solution \(u\in $H^{{\alpha,\vec\varphi,\gamma}}$_{q,p}(T)\cap $H^{{\vec\varphi,\gamma+2}}$_{q,p}(T)\), satisfying the estimate \(\|\partial_t^\$\alpha$ u\|_{$H^{{\vec\varphi,\gamma}}$_{q,p}(T)}+\|u\|_{$H^{{\vec\varphi,\gamma+2}}$_{q,p}(T)}\le C(\|f\|_{$H^{{\vec\varphi,\gamma}}$_{q,p}(T)}+\|1_{\$\alpha$ q>1}u_0\|_{$U^{{\alpha,\vec\varphi,\gamma}}$_{p,q}})\) and the maximal regularity bound \(\|(\vec\varphi\cdot\Delta_{\vec d})u\|_{$H^{{\vec\varphi,\gamma}}$_{q,p}(T)}\le C_0(\|f\|_{$H^{{\vec\varphi,\gamma}}$_{q,p}(T)}+\|1_{\$\alpha$ q>1}u_0\|_{$U^{{\alpha,\vec\varphi,\gamma}}$_{p,q}})\). Because the trace and extension results of Section 5 identify the interpolation space \(($H^{{\vec\varphi,\gamma+2}}$_p,$H^{{\vec\varphi,\gamma}}$_p)_{\psi,q}\) with \(\psi(t)=$t^{{1/(\alpha q)}}$\), the Besov space \($B^{{\vec\varphi,\gamma+2-2/(\alpha q)}}$_{p,q}\) is the sharp class of admissible initial data.

Load-bearing premise

The sharp-initial-data half of the main theorem depends on an abstract trace-and-extension theorem from earlier work being valid for these new space-time anisotropic solution spaces, a point the paper invokes rather than reproves.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For \(\alpha q>1\), the trace map from the solution class onto \(B^{\vec\varphi,\gamma+2-2/(\alpha q)}_{p,q}\) is exactly surjective: any starting value below that regularity leaves the solution class, and every starting value in it is realized by some solution.
  • The estimate \(\|(\vec\varphi\cdot\Delta_{\vec d})u\|_{L_q((0,T);L_p)}\le C_0(\|f\|+\|u_0\|_U)\) has a constant independent of \(T\), so it can serve as the a priori estimate in perturbation and fixed-point arguments for nonlinear versions of the equation.
  • In the stable case \(\varphi_i(\lambda)=\lambda^{\beta_i/2}\), the theorem covers sums of independent fractional Laplacians with different orders in different coordinate blocks, including mixed Brownian and stable behaviour.
  • The case \(\alpha=1\) sits inside the same statement, so the classical parabolic anisotropic theory is recovered as the endpoint of a single trace scale.
  • When \(\alpha q<1\), the initial value is automatically absorbed into \(f\), so zero-initial-data solutions carry the full regularity information and no separate trace theorem is needed.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct extension to variable-coefficient anisotropic non-local operators would likely follow if the coordinate-hierarchical kernel estimate of Theorem 3.2 could be localized; the paper does not pursue this.
  • The modified Littlewood–Paley projection \(\Delta_j^{\vec\varphi}\), defined by level sets of \(\sum_i\varphi_i(|\xi_i|^2)\), is a reusable tool for building anisotropic Besov spaces associated with other sums of non-local symbols.
  • The endpoint \(\alpha q=1\) is left with zero data; since the naive exponent \(2-2/(\alpha q)\) would then vanish, a genuine trace theory at the critical case, if it exists, will need a different mechanism.
  • For the representative operator \((\Delta_x)^{\beta_1/2}+(\Delta_y)^{\beta_2/2}\), the theorem predicts that optimal initial-data tolerance is governed by the single quantity \(\alpha q\), not by the individual \(\beta_i\); that prediction is testable by explicit kernel constructions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a regularity theory for the Caputo time-fractional evolution equation ∂^α_t u = Σ_{i=1}^ℓ φ_i(Δ_{x_i}) u + f with nontrivial initial data, where the φ_i are Bernstein functions satisfying a weak lower scaling condition. The main result, Theorem 2.10, asserts existence, uniqueness, and maximal L_q((0,T);L_p(R^d))-type regularity in the anisotropic Sobolev spaces H^{α,φ,γ}_{q,p}(T) ∩ H^{φ,γ+2}_{q,p}(T), with initial data in the Besov space B^{φ,γ+2−2/(αq)}_{p,q} when αq>1 and zero initial data otherwise. The proof combines a probabilistic representation of solutions via time-changed independent subordinate Brownian motions, delicate heat-kernel estimates for the anisotropic transition density (Section 3), a BMO–L∞ estimate for the spatial operator applied to the solution operator (Section 4), and a trace/extension theorem obtained by generalized real interpolation (Section 5). The zero-initial-data maximal regularity estimates are largely self-contained, while the nontrivial-initial-data half is imported from the authors' abstract framework in the preprint [6].

Significance. If the main theorem holds as stated, the paper provides a maximal regularity theory for a class of anisotropic nonlocal operators whose symbols are sums of Bernstein functions, a setting where classical Fourier multiplier methods are known to fail because the symbol is not homogeneous. The heat-kernel bounds in Theorem 3.2 and the BMO estimate in Lemma 4.4 are substantial technical contributions and are presented with detailed proofs. The identification of the sharp initial-data space via Besov spaces is an advertised goal, and the interpolation characterization in Corollary 5.6 is a useful step. However, the optimal-initial-data half of the main theorem rests on an unchecked import of abstract trace theorems from the authors' own preprint [6]; the paper does not verify the hypotheses of that framework for the anisotropic operator A = φ·Δ_d. This gap is load-bearing for Theorem 2.10 in the case αq>1. The zero-initial-data maximal regularity results and the heat-kernel machinery appear sound and are the strongest parts of the paper.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 5, proof of Theorem 5.1] The proof that B^{φ,γ+2−2/(αq)}_{p,q} is the trace space of H^{α,φ,γ}_{q,p}(T) ∩ H^{φ,γ+2}_{q,p}(T) is not self-contained. After establishing the interpolation identity in Corollary 5.6, the proof sets W(t)=t and κ(t)=t^{-α}/Γ(1−α) and then asserts that statement (i) "follows directly from [6, Theorem 5.3]" and statement (ii) from [6, Theorems 1.5 and 1.6]. No verification is given that the operator A = φ·Δ_d on E = H^{φ,γ}_p with domain H^{φ,γ+2}_p satisfies the sectoriality, resolvent, or functional-calculus hypotheses under which the abstract trace and extension theorems of [6] are stated. The anisotropic symbol m(ξ)=Σ_i φ_i(|ξ_i|^2) is not homogeneous, and the paper itself emphasizes in §1.3 that classical multiplier criteria fail for it; therefore applicability of the results in [6] is not automatic. If [6] requires, for instance, bounded imaginary powers or an H∞-calculus for A on E, such properties are known to be delicate for sums of subdimensional generators even when each component is well behaved. Consequently Theorem 5.1, Remark 2.11(i), and the αq>1 half of Theorem 2.10 are unsupported without a separate argument. The authors should either verify the hypotheses of [6] with explicit estimates for the anisotropic operator, or give a self-contained proof of the trace and extension theorem, for example by adapting the argument in [27] to the anisotropic Littlewood–Paley projections introduced in Section 5.
  2. [Theorem 2.10 and Theorem 5.1] The statement of the initial-data space in Theorem 2.10 reads u0 ∈ B^{φ,γ+2−2/(αq)}_{q,p}, and Theorem 5.1(ii) uses the same notation. According to Definition 2.6(iii) and Corollary 5.6(iii) (which identifies (H^{φ,γ+2}_p, H^{φ,γ}_p)_{ψ,q} with B^{φ,γ+2−2/(αq)}_{p,q}), the correct space is B^{φ,γ+2−2/(αq)}_{p,q}. The indices p and q appear to be interchanged in the theorem statements; all occurrences, including the norm in (2.13) and Definition 2.8, should be checked and corrected.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Proof of Proposition 2.9(iv)] The notation H^{2n}_p is used without prior definition; the intended space is presumably H^{φ,2n}_p or the corresponding Bessel-potential space in the anisotropic scale.
  2. [Theorem 3.2 and Lemma 3.6] The theorem statement does not specify the conventions for the boundary cases ℓ2=0 or ℓ1=0; empty products and empty sums should be explicitly declared so that formula (3.6) and the later permutation sums are well defined.
  3. [Proof of Lemma 4.2] The Fourier identity F_d[q_{α,β}(t,·)](ξ) = t^{α−β} E_{α,1−β+α}(−t^α Σ φ_i(|ξ_i|^2)) is quoted from [29, Lemma 3.7(iv)]; since the Mittag-Leffler normalization and the definition of q_{α,β} in (3.2) are essential, the authors should give a short derivation or at least state the exact convention used, so that readers can verify the identity in the anisotropic setting.
  4. [Proof of Theorem 3.1] The proof of Theorem 3.1 is delegated to a single sentence referencing [28, Lemma 3.5] and using Lemma 3.6 and Corollary 3.7(iii). Given that the kernel q_{α,β} here is not product-separable, a more explicit indication of which parts of [28] require modification would strengthen the paper.
  5. [Global] There are several typographical issues: "Codition" in Assumption 2.1, "EVOUTION EQUATIONS" in the running header, and the title hyphenation of "space-time anisotropic" in a few places. These should be corrected in the final version.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Optimal initial-data half of Theorem 2.10 rests on an unverified import from the authors' own preprint [6]; the zero-initial-data maximal regularity theory is self-contained.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section 5, proof of Theorem 5.1; cf. Remark 2.11(i)]
    "It suffices to adapt the framework provided in [6]. ... Applying Corollary 5.6, we have (H^{φ,γ+2}_p, H^{φ,γ}_p)_{(W◦κ∗),q} = B^{φ,γ+2−2/αq}_{p,q}. Then, statement (i) follows directly from [6, Theorem 5.3]. Moreover, according to [6, Theorem 1.6], for each u0 ∈ B^{φ,γ+2−2/(αq)}_{p,q}, there exist u ... and f ... satisfying ∂^α_t(u−u0)=f ..."

    The trace and extension theorem that identifies B^{φ,γ+2−2/(αq)}_{p,q} as the optimal initial-data space is not proved in this paper. After setting W(t)=t and κ(t)=t^{−α}/Γ(1−α), the proof of Theorem 5.1 simply invokes [6, Theorem 5.3] for trace and [6, Theorem 1.6] for extension. No verification is given in the paper that A=φ·Δ_d on H^{φ,γ}_p with domain H^{φ,γ+2}_p satisfies the hypotheses under which [6]'s abstract theorems are stated. Since [6] is a preprint by overlapping authors (Choi and Seo), the αq>1 half of Theorem 2.10 and Remark 2.11(i) is carried by a self-citation rather than by an independent derivation in this paper.

full rationale

The zero-initial-data maximal regularity estimates (Sections 3–4) are derived within the paper: the heat-kernel upper bounds for q_{α,β}, the BMO estimates for G, and the Fefferman–Stein/Marcinkiewicz argument are carried out in the text and do not reduce to a fitted parameter or to the theorem being proven. No fitted input is called a prediction. The circularity-type concern is concentrated in Section 5: the optimal initial-data class B^{φ,γ+2−2/(αq)}_{p,q} for αq>1 is established by importing the trace/extension framework from [6], the authors' own preprint. Section 5 does prove the interpolation identity (Corollary 5.6), so the reduction is not purely definitional; however, the final trace and extension statements are explicitly delegated to [6, Theorem 5.3], [6, Theorem 1.6], [6, Corollary 5.1], and [6, Theorem 1.5], with no check of the abstract hypotheses for the anisotropic generator φ·Δ_d. This is a load-bearing self-citation for the αq>1 half of the main theorem, while the central zero-initial-data content remains independent. Hence score 4: some self-citation, central claim still has independent content.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All constants in Assumption 2.1 (c0, delta0) are structural hypothesis parameters, not fitted to data. The central claim rests on external theorems: heat-kernel bounds for component processes from [4], the inverse-stable-subordinator representation and Mittag-Leffler identity from [29], and the Volterra trace and extension framework from [6]. These are not derived in the paper, and two of them come from overlapping author groups. There are no invented physical entities and no fitted free parameters.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Bernstein functions admit the representation phi(lambda)=b*lambda+int(1-e^{-lambda*t})mu(dt) and the generator identity phi(Delta_x)=F^{-1}[-phi(|cdot|^2)F], with derivative bound |phi^{(n)}(lambda)|<=C(n)lambda^{-n}phi(lambda).
    Used to define the spatial operators in Section 2.1 and to prove the Marcinkiewicz multiplier estimates in Proposition 5.4 (Eq. (2.3)-(2.4), Section 5).
  • domain assumption Heat kernel bounds for each component process p_i from [4, Theorem 3.3] hold under Assumption 2.1, including derivative and operator-power versions.
    These estimates are the input to Lemma 3.5 and Theorem 3.2; they are quoted from a prior paper with overlapping authorship rather than proved here.
  • domain assumption The time-changed density q satisfies q(t,x)=int p(r,x)phi(t,r)dr, the Fourier identity F[q_{alpha,beta}](xi)=t^{alpha-beta}E_{alpha,1-beta+alpha}(-t^alpha sum phi_i(|xi_i|^2)), and the bounds (3.8)-(3.9) for phi_{alpha,beta}.
    Imported from [29, Lemma 3.7]; it is the foundation for the solution representation (1.6) and for Lemma 4.2.
  • domain assumption The abstract trace and extension theorems for generalized Volterra equations from the authors' preprint [6] apply to the anisotropic solution spaces H^{alpha,phi,gamma}_{q,p}(T).
    The proof of Theorem 5.1 sets the parameters and cites [6, Theorems 1.5, 1.6, 5.3]; the hypotheses are not restated or verified in this manuscript.
  • standard math Classical tools: Marcinkiewicz multiplier theorem, Khintchine inequality, Fefferman-Stein sharp function theorem, Marcinkiewicz interpolation theorem, and Banach-valued Calderon-Zygmund theorem.
    Used in Proposition 5.4 and Theorem 4.1; standard results are invoked without proof.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A regularity theory for evolution equations with space-time anisotropic non-local operators in mixed-norm Sobolev spaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RXPT2ZJY

@misc{pith2026250500984,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A regularity theory for evolution equations with space-time anisotropic non-local operators in mixed-norm Sobolev spaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RXPT2ZJY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.00984}
}
abstract

In this article, we study the regularity of solutions to inhomogeneous time-fractional evolution equations involving anisotropic non-local operators in mixed-norm Sobolev spaces of variable order, with non-trivial initial conditions. The primary focus is on space-time non-local equations where the spatial operator is the infinitesimal generator of a vector of independent subordinate Brownian motions, making it the sum of subdimensional non-local operators. A representative example of such an operator is $(\Delta_{x})^{\beta_{1}/2}+(\Delta_{y})^{\beta_{2}/2}$. We establish existence, uniqueness, and precise estimates for solutions in corresponding Sobolev spaces. Due to singularities arising in the Fourier transforms of our operators, traditional methods involving Fourier analysis are not directly applicable. Instead, we employ a probabilistic approach to derive solution estimates. Additionally, we identify the optimal initial data space using generalized real interpolation theory.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [6]

    Choi, J.B

    J.-H. Choi, J.B. Lee, J. Seo, K. W oo, On the trace theorem f or Volterra-type equations with local or non-local derivat ives, arXiv preprint, arXiv:2309.00370v2

    arXiv

  2. [27]

    D. Kim, K. W oo, Sobolev spaces and trace theorems for tim e-fractional evolution equations, to appear in Potential Anal

    work page

  3. [1]

    Agresti, N

    A. Agresti, N. Lindemulder, M. Veraar, On the trace embed ding and its applications to evolution equations, Math. Nachr. 296 (2023), no.4, 1319–1350

    work page 2023

  4. [2]

    Alvarez, C

    E. Alvarez, C. Lizama, A characterization of Lp-maximal regularity for time-fractional systems in UMD spaces and applications, J. Differ. Equ. 389 (2024), 257–284

    work page 2024

  5. [3]

    Caffarelli, L

    L.A. Caffarelli, L. Silvestre An extension problem relat ed to the fractional Laplacian, Comm. Partial Differential Equations. 32 (2007), no. 7-9, 1245–1260

    work page 2007

  6. [4]

    J.-H. Choi, J. Kang, D. Park, A regularity theory for para bolic equations with anisotropic nonlocal operators in Lq(Lp)spaces, SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis , 56 (2024), no.1, 1264–1299

    work page 2024

  7. [5]

    J.-H. Choi, I. Kim, A maximal Lp-regularity theory to initial value problems with time meas urable nonlocal operators generated by additive processes, Stoch. Partial Differ. Equ. Anal. Comp. 12 (2023), no.1, 352-415

    work page 2023

  8. [7]

    W. Deng, X. W ang, P. Zhang, Anisotropic nonlocal diffusio n operators for normal and anomalous dynamics, Multiscale Model. Simul. 18 (2020), no.1, 415–443

    work page 2020

Show all 43 references
  1. [8]

    De Santis, A

    S. De Santis, A. Gabrielli, M. Bozzali, B. Maraviglia, E. Macaluso, S. Capuani, Anisotropic anomalous diffusion asse ssed in the human brain by scalar invariant indices, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 65 (2011), no.4, 1043-1052

    2011

  2. [9]

    H. Dong, D. Kim, On Lp-estimates for a class of non-local elliptic equations, J. Funct. Anal. 262 (2012), no.3, 1166-1199

    2012

  3. [10]

    H. Dong, D. Kim, Lp-estimates for time fractional parabolic equations with co efficients measurable in time, Adv. Math. 345 (2019), 289–345

    2019

  4. [11]

    H. Dong, D. Kim, Lp-estimates for time fractional parabolic equations in dive rgence form with measurable coefficients, J. Funct. Anal. 278 (2020), no.3, 108338

    2020

  5. [12]

    H. Dong, D. Kim, An approach for weighted mixed-norm est imates for parabolic equations with local and non-local tim e derivatives, Adv. Math. 377 (2021) 107494

    2021

  6. [13]

    H. Dong, D. Kim, Time fractional parabolic equations wi th measurable coefficients and embeddings for fractional par abolic Sobolev spaces, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2021 (2021), no.22, 17563–17610

    2021

  7. [14]

    H. Dong, Y. Liu, W eighted mixed norm estimates for fract ional wave equations with VMO coefficients, J. Differ. Equ. 337 (2022), no.15, 168–254

    2022

  8. [15]

    H. Dong, D. Kim, Time fractional parabolic equations wi th partially SMO coefficients, J. Differ. Equ. 377 (2023), no. 25, 759–808

    2023

  9. [16]

    H. Dong, Y. Liu, Sobolev estimates for fractional parab olic equations with space-time non-local operators, Calc. Var. 62 (2023), no.3, 96

    2023

  10. [17]

    H. Dong, J. Ryu, Nonlocal elliptic and parabolic equati ons with general stable operators in weighted Sobolev space s, SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 56 (2024), no. 4, 4623-4661

    2024

  11. [18]

    dos Santos, R

    E.B. dos Santos, R. Leit˜ ao, On the H¨ older regularity f or solutions of integro-differential equations like the ani sotropic fractional Laplacian, Partial Differ. Equ. Appl. 2 (2021), no.25, 1–34

    2021

  12. [19]

    Farkas, N

    W. Farkas, N. Jacob, R.L. Schilling, Function Spaces Related to Continuous Negative Definite Fun ctions: ψ -Bessel Potential Spaces. Polska Akademia Nauk, Instytut Mathematyczny (2001). EVOUTION EQUATIONS WITH SPACE-TIME ANISOTROPIC NON-LOCAL OPERATORS 43

    2001

  13. [20]

    Grafakos, Classical Fourier Analysis, Springer, (2014)

    L. Grafakos, Classical Fourier Analysis, Springer, (2014)

    2014

  14. [21]

    Gupta, S

    R. Gupta, S. Kumar, A Space-Time Spectral Collocation M ethod for Two-Dimensional Variable-Order Space-Time Frac tional Advection–Diffusion Equation, Int. J. Appl. Comput. Math. 11 (2025), no.11

    2025

  15. [22]

    Hall, T.R

    M.G. Hall, T.R. Barrick, From diffusion-weighted MRI to anomalous diffusion imaging, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 59 (2008), no.3, 447–455

    2008

  16. [23]

    B.-S. Han, K. Kim, D. Park, W eighted Lq(Lp)-estimate with Muckenhoupt weights for the diffusion-wave equations with time- fractional derivatives, J. Differ. Equ. 269 (2020), no.4, 3515–3550

    2020

  17. [24]

    Hardy, Combinatorics of Partial Derivatives, Electronic Journal of Combinatorics 13 (2006), no.1, R1

    M. Hardy, Combinatorics of Partial Derivatives, Electronic Journal of Combinatorics 13 (2006), no.1, R1

    2006

  18. [25]

    J. Kang, D. Park, An Lq(Lp)-theory for space-time non-local equations generated by L ´ evy processes with low intensity of small jumps, Stoch. Partial Differ. Equ. Anal. Comp. 12 (2024), no.3, 1439–1491

    2024

  19. [26]

    Ken-Iti, L´ evy processes and infinitely divisible di stributions, Cambridge University Press (1999)

    S. Ken-Iti, L´ evy processes and infinitely divisible di stributions, Cambridge University Press (1999)

    1999

  20. [28]

    I. Kim, K. Kim, S. Lim, An Lq(Lp)-theory for the time fractional evolution equations with v ariable coefficients, Adv. Math. 306 (2017), 123–176

    2017

  21. [29]

    K. Kim, D. Park, J. Ryu, An Lq(Lp)-theory for diffusion equations with space-time nonlocal o perators J. Differ. Equ. 287 (2021), no.25, 376–427

    2021

  22. [30]

    Krylov, On the Calder´ on-Zygmund theorem with app lications to parabolic equations, St

    N.V. Krylov, On the Calder´ on-Zygmund theorem with app lications to parabolic equations, St. Petersburg Math. J. , 13 (2002), no.4, 509-526

    2002

  23. [31]

    Leit˜ ao, Almgren’s frequency formula for an extension problem related to the anisotropic fractional Laplacian , Rev

    R. Leit˜ ao, Almgren’s frequency formula for an extension problem related to the anisotropic fractional Laplacian , Rev. Math. Iberoam. 36 (2020), no.3, 641–660

    2020

  24. [32]

    Leit˜ ao, Lp-estimates for solutions governed by operators like the ani sotropic fractional Laplacian, Bull

    R. Leit˜ ao, Lp-estimates for solutions governed by operators like the ani sotropic fractional Laplacian, Bull. Braz. Math. Soc. 54 (2023), no.34

    2023

  25. [33]

    Mikuleviˇ cius, C

    R. Mikuleviˇ cius, C. Phonsom, On Lp-theory for parabolic and elliptic integro-differential eq uations with scalable operators in the whole space, Stoch. Partial Differ. Equ. 5 (2017), no.4, 472-519

    2017

  26. [34]

    Mikuleviˇ cius, C

    R. Mikuleviˇ cius, C. Phonsom, On the Cauchy problem for integro-differential equations in the scale of spaces of gen eralized smooth- ness, Potential Anal. 50 (2019), no.3, 467-519

    2019

  27. [35]

    Park, W eighted maximal Lq(Lp)-regularity theory for time-fractional diffusion-wave eq uations with variable coefficients, J

    D. Park, W eighted maximal Lq(Lp)-regularity theory for time-fractional diffusion-wave eq uations with variable coefficients, J. Evol. Equ. 23 (2023), no.12

    2023

  28. [36]

    Y. Povstenko, Space-Time-Fractional Advection Diffus ion Equation in a Plane Advances in Modelling and Control of Non-integer- Order Systems: 6th Conference on Non-integer Order Calculu s and Its Applications, Springer, (2015), 275–284

    2015

  29. [37]

    Pr¨ uss, Evolutionary Integral Equations and Applications, Birkh¨ auser, 2013

    J. Pr¨ uss, Evolutionary Integral Equations and Applications, Birkh¨ auser, 2013

    2013

  30. [38]

    Schilling, R

    R.L. Schilling, R. Song, Z. Vondraˇ cek, Bernstein Functions: Theory and Applications, De Gruyter, 2012

    2012

  31. [39]

    Stein, T.S

    E.M. Stein, T.S. Murphy, Harmonic Analysis: Real-Variable Methods, Orthogonality , and Oscillatory integrals, Princeton University Press, 1993

    1993

  32. [40]

    Zacher, Maximal regularity of type Lp for abstract parabolic Volterra equations, J

    R. Zacher, Maximal regularity of type Lp for abstract parabolic Volterra equations, J. Evol. Equ. 5 (2005), 79–103

    2005

  33. [41]

    Zacher, Quasilinear parabolic integro-differentia l equations with nonlinear boundary conditions, Differential Integral Equations, 19 (2006), no.10, 1129–1156

    R. Zacher, Quasilinear parabolic integro-differentia l equations with nonlinear boundary conditions, Differential Integral Equations, 19 (2006), no.10, 1129–1156

    2006

  34. [42]

    Zaslavsky, Chaos, fractional kinetics, and anoma lous transport, Phys

    G.M. Zaslavsky, Chaos, fractional kinetics, and anoma lous transport, Phys. Rep, 371 (2002), no.6, 461–580

    2002

  35. [43]

    Zaslavsky, M

    G.M. Zaslavsky, M. Edelman, B.A. Niyazov, Self-simila rity, renormalization, and phase space nonuniformity of Ha miltonian chaotic dynamics, Chaos, 7 (1997), 159–181. School of Mathematics, Korea Institute for Advanced Study, 8 5 Hoegi-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02455, Republic ...

    1997

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.