REVIEW
Sensing Framework Design and Performance Optimization with Action Detection for ISCC
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Integrated sensing, communication, and computation (ISCC) has been regarded as a prospective technology for the next-generation wireless network, supporting humancentric intelligent applications. However, the delay sensitivity of these computation-intensive applications, especially in a multidevice ISCC system with limited resources, highlights the urgent need for efficient sensing task execution frameworks. To address this, we propose a resource-efficient sensing framework in this paper. Different from existing solutions, it features a novel action detection module deployed at each device to detect the onset of an action. Only time windows filled with signals of interest are offloaded to the edge server and processed by the edge recognition module, thus reducing overhead. Furthermore, we quantitatively analyze the sensing performance of the proposed sensing framework and formulate a sensing accuracy maximization problem under power, delay, and resource limitations for the multi-device ISCC system. By decomposing it into two subproblems, we develop an alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM)-based distributed algorithm. It alternatively solves a sensing accuracy maximization subproblem at each device and employs a closed-form computation resource allocation strategy at the edge server till convergence. Finally, a real-world test is conducted using commodity wireless devices to validate the sensing performance analysis. Extensive test results demonstrate that our proposal achieves higher sensing accuracy under the limited resource compared to two baselines.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.