Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Prediction of ELM-free Operation in Spherical Tokamaks With High Plasma Squareness

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Increasing plasma squareness can make spherical-tokamak H-mode naturally ELM-free.

desk verdict High squareness is a plausible ELM-free lever in STs, but the PBM-invariance claim needs a stronger contour-based case and the abstract overstates the RF model. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.02727 v1 pith:TBP46X2M submitted 2025-05-05 physics.plasm-ph

J. F. Parisi , J. W. Berkery , K. Imada , A. O. Nelson , S. M. Kaye , P. B. Snyder , M. Lampert , A. Kleiner This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-ph
keywords sphericaltokamakELM-freeH-modeplasmasquarenesspedestalstabilitypeeling-ballooningmodekineticballooningrandomforestwidth-heightscaling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper predicts that shaping a spherical tokamak's cross-section to be more square could let the plasma run in H-mode without the violent edge-localized modes (ELMs) that threaten future fusion reactors. The key claim is that increasing the outer squareness (the $m=8$ shaping moment) lowers the steepest pressure gradient the pedestal can hold before kinetic ballooning modes destabilize, while leaving the peeling-ballooning mode boundary—the threshold thought to trigger Type-1 ELMs—almost unchanged. A first-stable pedestal with lower gradients can therefore sit farther from the ELM boundary while still sustaining H-mode. The authors support this with gyrokinetic simulations and ideal-MHD peeling-ballooning calculations, and with random-forest models that reproduce the gyrokinetic results using only a few geometric inputs. If the prediction holds, squareness becomes a practical control lever for ELM-free operation at low aspect ratio.

What carries the argument

The argument runs on the combined pedestal width-height stability diagram in $(\Delta_{\mathrm{ped}}, \beta_{\theta,\mathrm{ped}})$ space. The kinetic-ballooning (KBM) branch is computed with gyrokinetic flux-tube simulations, producing the first-stability width-height scaling $\Delta_{\mathrm{ped}}=a(\beta_{\theta,\mathrm{ped}})^b$; the peeling-ballooning (PBM) branch is computed with an ideal-MHD stability calculation, with the ELM boundary fixed by the fine-tuned growth-rate criterion $\gamma_f = \omega_{*i}/400$ chosen so the nominal spherical-tokamak discharge sits at the limit. Squareness enters through the $m=8$ outer shaping moment $\zeta_0$, which changes the magnetic geometry (flux expansion, poloidal field, pitch angle, Shafranov shift) that enters the gyrokinetic coefficients. Random-forest models take outboard-midplane geometric coefficients—parallel streaming, field-line packing and twist, flux expansion, drift frequencies, Shafranov shift, local shear—and predict either the KBM growth rate or $\delta\beta_{\theta,\mathrm{ped}}$, the distance below the first-stability boundary. The key result is the asymmetry: these geometry changes move the KBM boundary but barely move the PBM boundary.

What would settle it

A direct test would be a squareness scan on a spherical tokamak at fixed plasma current and normalized beta: if high-squareness discharges still cross into Type-1 ELMs at the same pedestal height as low-squareness ones, the predicted ELM-free margin does not exist. Alternatively, recomputing the peeling-ballooning stability boundary including extended-MHD or diamagnetic effects and showing that it rotates with squareness would falsify the invariance claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a split in how plasma squareness affects the two stability limits that set the pedestal. In low-aspect-ratio (spherical) tokamaks, raising the outer squareness reduces the critical pressure gradient for kinetic ballooning modes in first stability—the gyrokinetic width-height scaling shifts down—whereas the ideal peeling-ballooning stability boundary, calibrated to the Type-1 ELM limit, barely moves. With the PBM boundary fixed and the KBM-limited gradient lowered, the operating point moves away from the ELMy region. The paper states this as: 'while higher squareness destabilizes ballooning modes in first stability, the ELM stability boundary is essentially unchanged', predicting ELM-free H-mode for sufficiently high squareness. The authors also show that a random-forest model using only three easily obtainable geometric inputs predicts the distance to the KBM first-stability boundary with $R^2 = 0.965$ on a held-out test set.

Load-bearing premise

The prediction rests on one calibration: the chosen growth-rate cutoff $\gamma_f = \omega_{*i}/400$ is assumed to mark exactly where the device begins producing Type-1 ELMs, and this cutoff is assumed not to shift as squareness is raised. If either part fails, the claimed ELM-free margin is not established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In a spherical tokamak, raising outer squareness at fixed plasma current and normalized beta should push the pedestal further below the Type-1 ELM boundary, giving naturally ELM-free H-mode operation.
  • The gyrokinetic width-height scaling predicts that the maximum achievable pedestal height $\beta_{\theta,\mathrm{ped}}$ can change by a factor of about 1.5 across the squareness range studied.
  • Because the PBM boundary is insensitive to squareness but sensitive to triangularity, the same lever cannot be assumed to work when triangularity is also varied; the paper explicitly warns about this.
  • A random-forest model with only three easily obtainable geometric inputs reproduces the distance to the KBM width-height scaling with $R^2=0.965$ on a held-out test set, suggesting a cheap surrogate for pedestal stability scans.
  • High squareness also closes off access to second ballooning stability, so the ELM-free benefit applies specifically to first-stable pedestals.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The invariance of the PBM boundary is the crux; if extended-MHD effects or diamagnetic stabilization shift the ELM threshold with squareness, the predicted ELM-free margin would shrink or vanish. A direct squareness scan on a spherical tokamak at fixed $\beta_N$ and $I_p$ would test this cleanly.
  • The random-forest proximity model could be retrained on other shape parameters, such as triangularity or elongation, to build a fast 'ELM-free margin' map for design optimization; the triangularity case would need careful treatment because the PBM boundary itself moves.
  • If the mechanism is generic, high-squareness design gives fusion power plants an extra actuator: deliberately degrade the KBM limit to lower pedestal gradients while staying in H-mode, trading some pedestal height for ELM avoidance. Squareness control is already established, so this is an engineering-accessible knob.
  • Some past wide-pedestal ELM-free H-modes on spherical tokamaks may owe their stability to the same geometry-driven separation of KBM and PBM limits, with squareness as an under-appreciated contributing factor.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper uses gyrokinetic (GS2) and ideal-MHD peeling-ballooning (ELITE) simulations to study how plasma squareness affects pedestal stability in spherical tokamaks. The authors report that increasing outer squareness degrades kinetic-ballooning-mode (KBM) first-stability limits, lowering the maximum achievable pedestal pressure gradient, while the peeling-ballooning-mode (PBM) stability boundary remains essentially unchanged. They combine these results to predict that high squareness could produce ELM-free H-mode operation in STs, because the pedestal would sit farther from the Type-I ELM boundary. The paper also introduces Random Forest models trained on geometric coefficients to predict KBM growth rates and distance from first stability, reporting high test accuracy (R^2 = 0.86 and 0.965 respectively). The work includes a large gyrokinetic database (15,246 simulations) and internal consistency checks with BALOO.

Significance. If the central prediction holds, the paper identifies a practical, controllable shaping parameter - outer squareness - that could yield naturally ELM-free H-mode operation in spherical tokamaks, with a mechanism grounded in first-principles gyrokinetics. The gyrokinetic database is large and internally checked, and the Random Forest surrogates are a useful step toward fast pedestal prediction for design and control. The paper is also honest about open questions, including the physical mechanism behind PBM invariance and the possible role of extended-MHD effects. However, the prediction's load-bearing element is the calibration and squareness-invariance of the PBM boundary, which is currently supported by a single fine-tuned growth-rate threshold; the robustness of that element is not yet demonstrated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section V.A] The entire ELM-free prediction rests on the fine-tuned threshold gamma_f = omega_*i/400, chosen so that the nominal MAST-U discharge sits on the PBM boundary. The paper provides no sensitivity analysis or uncertainty quantification for this threshold. Because the predicted ELM-free margin is the distance between the KBM-limited operating point and the PBM boundary, a squareness-dependent shift of the true ELM boundary, or a miscalibration of gamma_f by even a factor of two, could eliminate the predicted margin. Please demonstrate that the PBM boundary remains relatively invariant across squareness for a range of gamma_f values (e.g., a factor of 2 around the chosen value), and explicitly discuss how the prediction would change if the standard criterion gamma > omega_*i/4 were used.
  2. [Section V.B, Figure 6] The claim that the PBM stability boundary is 'essentially unchanged' with squareness is supported only by a single fitted power-law curve per squareness value, extracted at one threshold. This does not allow the reader to assess whether the apparent invariance is robust or an artifact of the threshold selection. To make the claim falsifiable, please show the underlying ELITE growth-rate data for all four squareness values, for example as contours of gamma/(omega_*i) at several levels, and quantify the spread in the fitted power-law parameters (a, b) across squareness.
  3. [Section V.B] The MAST-U KBM first-stability boundaries plotted in Figure 6 are central to the prediction, but the manuscript does not describe the gyrokinetic setup used to obtain them. Section III details the NSTX database (seven flux surfaces, three binormal wavenumbers, automated mode finder), but no equivalent information is given for the MAST-U KBM boundaries. If these boundaries come from new GS2 simulations, please specify the flux surfaces, wavenumbers, and mode identification; if they are transferred from NSTX via a scaling or assumption, state that explicitly. This is necessary because the combined constraint picture in Figure 6 is the basis for the ELM-free prediction.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] The discharge identifier is inconsistent: 'MAST-U 48399' appears in Section V.A and in the caption of Figure 5, and 'MAST-U 43889' appears in Section V.B; these should be 'MAST-U 48339'.
  2. [Section IV] The text says 'infinte-n ballooning stability'; this should be 'infinite-n ballooning stability'.
  3. [Section VI.C] The text refers to 'Figure 10(a)', but Figure 10 appears to be a single panel; please correct the reference or split the figure.
  4. [Section V.A, Eq. (6)] The PBM scaling fit is given as Delta_ped = 0.20 (beta_theta,ped)^1.22; please specify the normalization of Delta_ped (likely minor radius) and the range of the fitting domain in Figure 5, since the displayed width-height range is limited.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the KBM pedestal shift is computed from first-principles gyrokinetics, and the PBM invariance is a computed ELITE result rather than an input assumption.

full rationale

The central claim rests on two independent computations: the KBM width-height scaling is obtained from 15,246 GS2 gyrokinetic simulations and cross-checked with the BALOO infinite-n ballooning code, while the PBM boundary is obtained from ELITE ideal-MHD calculations. The ELM-free prediction follows from the independently computed downward shift of the KBM first-stability boundary with increasing squareness, combined with the computed near-invariance of the PBM boundary. The paper transparently calibrates the PBM threshold (gamma_f = omega_*i/400) to place the nominal MAST-U discharge at the Type-1 ELM limit because the standard gamma > omega_*i/4 criterion gives no unstable region at low aspect ratio. That calibration is a modeling limitation and an uncertainty in the absolute margin, but it is not a circular reduction: the high-squareness margin is not forced by the fit, since the KBM shift is independently computed and the PBM contour invariance is a computed result, not an input. The paper's own caveats about the outstanding mechanism and missing extended-MHD effects (Sec. V.B) are correctness concerns, not circularity. The Random Forest surrogates are trained and tested on the gyrokinetic database (R^2_test = 0.86 for gamma and 0.965 for delta_beta) and are used for interpolation within the same equilibrium family, not as the physical source of the claim. Self-citations to [61, 82, 110, 115, 160] are methodological and not load-bearing. No step in the derivation chain reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the EPED-style assumption that KBM limits pedestal gradient and PBM triggers ELMs, plus a calibrated ideal-MHD threshold gamma_f and the assumption that first-stable H-mode remains accessible. The only explicit fitted parameter is gamma_f, with the PBM scaling coefficients derived from it. No invented entities appear. The RF models add fitted surrogates but do not carry the physical trend.

free parameters (2)
  • PBM fine-tuned growth-rate threshold gamma_f = omega_*i/400
    Chosen in Section V A so the nominal MAST-U 48339 equilibrium is close to the Type-1 ELM limit after ideal ELITE growth rates were found too low (gamma > omega_*i/4 gave no unstable region). The PBM width-height scaling and the predicted ELM-free margin depend on this calibration.
  • PBM scaling coefficients (a, b) = a = 0.20, b = 1.22
    Power-law fit Delta_ped = a (beta)^b to the fine-tuned ELITE boundary, Equation 6. These summarize the boundary and are used to compare squareness cases, though the physical threshold is set by gamma_f.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption KBM instability limits the pedestal pressure gradient in the EPED/gyrokinetic framework
    Used throughout Sections IV and V; pedestal width-height scalings are constructed from KBM stability boundaries following [60,130].
  • domain assumption Type-1 ELMs are triggered when the ideal PBM growth rate exceeds a threshold, and a fine-tuned threshold can represent the MAST-U ELM limit
    Section V A: ideal PBM growth rates are too low at low aspect ratio, so gamma_f = omega_*i/400 is adopted to match the experimental point.
  • domain assumption First-stable, lower-gradient pedestals can still sustain H-mode in spherical tokamaks
    Section I and the Summary argue STs can remain in first stability; if this fails, degraded KBM limits would not yield ELM-free H-mode.
  • domain assumption Squareness scans conserve total plasma current and normalized beta
    Section II: equilibria are reconstructed with conserved Ip and beta_N; the geometric effects attributed to squareness depend on this constraint.
  • domain assumption Outboard-midplane geometric coefficients are sufficient for the RF models
    Section VI assumes OMP evaluation; Appendix C shows eigenmode averaging yields only marginal improvement (R2 0.92 versus 0.86), providing partial support.
  • domain assumption The gyrokinetic and MHD codes (GS2, ELITE, BALOO) correctly compute the relevant linear instabilities
    The entire study relies on these codes; no code verification artifacts are shipped.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Prediction of ELM-free Operation in Spherical Tokamaks With High Plasma Squareness." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TBP46X2M

@misc{pith2026250502727,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Prediction of ELM-free Operation in Spherical Tokamaks With High Plasma Squareness},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TBP46X2M}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.02727}
}
abstract

We predict that high plasma squareness in spherical tokamaks (STs) could result in edge-localized-mode (ELM)-free H-mode. The effect of squareness on gyrokinetic and peeling-ballooning-mode width-height pedestal scalings is calculated for STs. Because STs can sustain H-mode in first ballooning stability, first-stable pedestals with lower gradients may be further from the peeling-ballooning-mode boundary and therefore naturally free of Type 1 ELMs. We show that while higher squareness destabilizes ballooning modes in first stability, the ELM stability boundary is essentially unchanged. Therefore, higher squareness could result in ELM-free discharges. Random Forest (RF) machine learning models for the gyrokinetic growth rate and distance from first stability are used to predict how squareness affects stability. A RF model with only three easily obtainable geometric inputs predicts proximity to the gyrokinetic width-height scaling on a test dataset with high accuracy, $R^2 = 0.965$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.02727 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Schematic effect of squareness on PBM (solid) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Quantities for MAST-U 48339 with four different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4: (a): Gyrokinetic pedestal width-height scalings for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Ideal PBM stability across pedestal width and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: First and second KBM stability boundaries and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Spearman correlation of geometric coefficients in NSTX pedestals with six squareness values based on NSTX 132543. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Random Forest model results for KBM growth rates [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Random Forest model results for KBM growth rates in NSTX 132543 across a range of binormal wavenumbers. All [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Random Forest model results for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: Values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: Distance to the first stability boundary for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14: Random Forest model results for KBM growth [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15: Random Forest model results for KBM growth rates in NSTX across a range of binormal wavenumbers. All [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16: Spearman correlation of geometric coefficients in NSTX pedestals with six squareness values based on NSTX [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_16.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Steady state, core, operational optimization of an ARC-like tokamak via plasma composition and shape

    physics.plasm-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Joint optimization of impurity mix, plasma shape, and pedestal density in a modeled ARC tokamak raises predicted fusion power by up to 65% compared with the nominal design.

  2. Turbulent Transport-Limited Pedestals in Tokamaks

    physics.plasm-ph 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A transport threshold model derives pedestal width-height scalings for tokamaks in which electron-temperature-gradient turbulence, not edge instabilities, limits the pedestal.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

209 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    M. R. Wade and J. A. Leuer, Fusion Science and Tech- nology 77, 119 (2021)

    2021

  2. [2]

    Wagner, G

    F. Wagner, G. Becker, K. Behringer, D. Campbell, A. Eberhagen, W. Engelhardt, G. Fussmann, O. Gehre, J. Gernhardt, G. v. Gierke, G. Haas, M. Huang, F. Karger, M. Keilhacker, O. Kl¨ uber, M. Kornherr, K. Lackner, G. Lisitano, G. G. Lister, H. M. Mayer, D. Meisel, E. R. M¨ uller, H. Murmann, H. Niedermeyer, W. Poschenrieder, H. Rapp, H. R¨ ohr, F. Schneider...

    1982

  3. [3]

    P. B. Snyder, J. W. Hughes, T. H. Osborne, C. Paz- Soldan, W. M. Solomon, M. Knolker, D. Eldon, T. Evans, T. Golfinopoulos, B. A. Grierson, R. J. Groeb- ner, A. E. Hubbard, E. Kolemen, B. Labombard, F. M. Laggner, O. Meneghini, S. Mordijck, T. Petrie, S. Scott, H. Q. Wang, H. R. Wilson, and Y. B. Zhu, Nuclear Fu- sion 59, 086017 (2019)

    2019

  4. [4]

    M. E. Austin, A. Marinoni, M. L. Walker, M. W. Brook- man, J. S. Degrassie, A. W. Hyatt, G. R. McKee, C. C. Petty, T. L. Rhodes, S. P. Smith, C. Sung, K. E. Thome, and A. D. Turnbull, Physical Review Letters 122, 115001 (2019)

    2019

  5. [5]

    Nelson, L

    A. Nelson, L. Schmitz, C. Paz-Soldan, K. E. Thome, T. B. Cote, N. Leuthold, F. Scotti, M. E. Austin, A. Hy- att, and T. Osborne, Physical Review Letters 131, 195101 (2023)

    2023

  6. [6]

    H. S. Wilson, A. O. Nelson, J. McClenaghan, P. Rodriguez-Fernandez, J. F. Parisi, and C. Paz- Soldan, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion (2024)

    2024

  7. [7]

    Federici, C

    G. Federici, C. Bachmann, L. Barucca, C. Baylard, W. Biel, L. Boccaccini, C. Bustreo, S. Ciattaglia, F. Cis- mondi, V. Corato, C. Day, E. Diegele, T. Franke, 18 A|∇ N α|2 A∇N α· ∇ N q A|∇ N q|2 ω ακ ω α∇B (ω q κ) BN ˆb· ∇ N θ αMHD|slocal | (k⊥N ) ˜ωM N A|∇N α|2 A∇N α · ∇N q A|∇N q|2 ω α κ ω α ∇B (ω q κ) BN ˆb · ∇N θ αMHD |slocal| (k⊥N ) ˜ωM N 1 0.19 -0.91...

    2019

  8. [8]

    A. J. Creely, M. J. Greenwald, S. B. Ballinger, D. Brun- ner, J. Canik, J. Doody, T. F¨ ul¨ op, D. T. Garnier, R. Granetz, T. K. Gray, C. Holland, N. T. Howard, J. W. Hughes, J. H. Irby, V. A. Izzo, G. J. Kramer, A. Q. Kuang, B. LaBombard, Y. Lin, B. Lipschultz, N. C. Logan, J. D. Lore, E. S. Marmar, K. Montes, R. T. Mumgaard, C. Paz-Soldan, C. Rea, M. L....

    2020

Show all 209 references
  1. [9]

    S. I. Muldrew, C. Harrington, J. Keep, C. Waldon, C. Ashe, R. Chapman, C. Griesel, A. J. Pearce, F. Cas- son, S. P. Marsden, and E. Tholerus, Fusion Engineer- ing and Design 201, 114238 (2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    Maingi, Nuclear Fusion 54, 114016 (2014)

    R. Maingi, Nuclear Fusion 54, 114016 (2014)

    2014

  3. [11]

    J. W. Hughes, N. T. Howard, P. Rodriguez-Fernandez, A. J. Creely, A. Q. Kuang, P. B. Snyder, T. M. Wilks, R. Sweeney, and M. Greenwald, Journal of Plasma Physics 86 (2020). 19

    2020

  4. [12]

    A. Q. Kuang, S. Ballinger, D. Brunner, J. Canik, A. J. Creely, T. Gray, M. Greenwald, J. W. Hughes, J. Irby, B. Labombard, B. Lipschultz, J. D. Lore, M. L. Reinke, J. L. Terry, M. Umansky, D. G. Whyte, and S. Wukitch, Journal of Plasma Physics (2020), 10.1017/S0022377820001117

    2020 doi

  5. [13]

    Viezzer, M

    E. Viezzer, M. Austin, M. Bernert, K. Burrell, P. Cano-Megias, X. Chen, D. J. Cruz-Zabala, S. Coda, M. Faitsch, O. F´ evrier, et al. , Nuclear Materials and Energy 34, 101308 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    Faitsch, T

    M. Faitsch, T. Eich, G. Harrer, E. Wolfrum, D. Brida, P. David, M. Griener, U. Stroth, A. U. Team, E. M. Team, et al. , Nuclear Materials and Energy 26, 100890 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    G. F. Harrer, M. Faitsch, L. Radovanovic, E. Wolfrum, C. Albert, A. Cathey, M. Cavedon, M. Dunne, T. Eich, R. Fischer, M. Griener, M. Hoelzl, B. Labit, H. Meyer, F. Aumayr, T. A. U. Team, and T. E. M. Team, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 165001 (2022)

    2022

  8. [16]

    Radovanovic, M

    L. Radovanovic, M. Dunne, E. Wolfrum, G. Harrer, M. Faitsch, R. Fischer, F. Aumayr, the ASDEX Up- grade Team, and the EUROfusion MST1 Team, Nu- clear Fusion 62, 086004 (2022)

    2022

  9. [17]

    Faitsch, T

    M. Faitsch, T. Eich, G. Harrer, E. Wolfrum, D. Brida, P. David, M. Dunne, L. Gil, B. Labit, U. Stroth, et al. , Nuclear Fusion 63, 076013 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    M. G. Dunne, M. Faitsch, L. Radovanovi´ c, and E. Wol- frum, Nuclear Fusion (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    Maingi, R

    R. Maingi, R. E. Bell, B. P. LeBlanc, D. A. Gates, S. M. Kaye, J. E. Menard, S. A. Sabbagh, and H. Yuh, Jour- nal of nuclear materials 390, 440 (2009)

    2009

  12. [20]

    Maingi, R

    R. Maingi, R. E. Bell, J. M. Canik, S. P. Gerhardt, S. M. Kaye, B. P. LeBlanc, T. H. Osborne, M. G. Bell, E. D. Fredrickson, K. C. Lee, J. E. Menard, J.-K. Park, S. A. Sabbagh, and S. A. Sabbagh, Physical Review Letters 105, 135004 (2010)

    2010

  13. [21]

    J. M. Canik, W. Guttenfelder, R. Maingi, T. H. Os- borne, S. Kubota, Y. Ren, R. E. Bell, H. W. Kugel, B. P. Leblanc, and V. A. Souhkanovskii, Nuclear Fu- sion 53 (2013), 10.1088/0029-5515/53/11/113016

    2013 doi

  14. [22]

    Gerhardt, J

    S. Gerhardt, J. Canik, R. Maingi, D. Battaglia, R. Bell, W. Guttenfelder, B. LeBlanc, D. Smith, H. Yuh, and S. Sabbagh, Nuclear Fusion 54, 083021 (2014)

    2014

  15. [23]

    A. E. Hubbard, R. L. Boivin, R. S. Granetz, M. Green- wald, J. W. Hughes, I. H. Hutchinson, J. Irby, B. LaBombard, Y. Lin, E. S. Marmar, et al. , Physics of Plasmas 8, 2033 (2001)

    2001

  16. [24]

    LaBombard, T

    B. LaBombard, T. Golfinopoulos, J. L. Terry, D. Brun- ner, E. Davis, M. Greenwald, J. W. Hughes, and A. C.- M. Team, Physics of Plasmas 21, 056108 (2014)

    2014

  17. [25]

    L. Gil, C. Silva, T. Happel, G. Birkenmeier, G. Conway, L. Guimarais, A. Kallenbach, T. P¨ utterich, J. Santos, P. Schneider, M. Schubert, E. Seliunin, A. Silva, J. Sto- ber, U. Stroth, E. Trier, E. Wolfrum, the ASDEX Up- grade team, and the EUROfusion MST1 team, Nuclear Fusio...

    2020

  18. [26]

    Macwan, K

    T. Macwan, K. Barada, J. F. Parisi, R. J. Groeb- ner, T. L. Rhodes, S. Banerjee, C. Chrystal, Q. Pratt, Z. Yan, H. Wang, L. Zeng, M. E. Austin, N. A. Crocker, and W. A. Peebles, Physics of Plasmas 31, 122503 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    Greenwald, J

    M. Greenwald, J. Schachter, W. Dorland, R. Granetz, A. Hubbard, J. Rice, J. Snipes, P. Stek, and S. Wolfe, Plasma physics and controlled fusion 40, 789 (1998)

    1998

  20. [28]

    Ryter, W

    F. Ryter, W. Suttrop, B. Br¨ usehaber, M. Kaufmann, V. Mertens, H. Murmann, A. Peeters, J. Stober, J. Schweinzer, H. Zohm, et al., Plasma physics and con- trolled fusion 40, 725 (1998)

    1998

  21. [29]

    D. G. Whyte, A. E. Hubbard, J. W. Hughes, B. Lip- schultz, J. E. Rice, E. S. Marmar, M. Green- wald, I. Cziegler, A. Dominguez, T. Golfinopoulos, N. Howard, L. Lin, R. M. McDermottb, M. Porkolab, M. L. Reinke, J. Terry, N. Tsujii, S. Wolfe, S. Wukitch, and Y. Lin, Nuclear Fusi...

    2010

  22. [30]

    Hubbard, S.-G

    A. Hubbard, S.-G. Baek, D. Brunner, A. Creely, I. Cziegler, E. Edlund, J. Hughes, B. LaBombard, Y. Lin, Z. Liu, E. Marmar, M. Reinke, J. Rice, B. Sor- bom, C. Sung, J. Terry, C. Theiler, E. Tolman, J. Walk, A. White, D. Whyte, S. Wolfe, S. Wukitch, X. Xu, and the Alcator C-Mod...

    2017

  23. [31]

    K. H. Burrell, M. E. Austin, D. P. Brennan, J. C. De- Boo, E. J. Doyle, C. Fenzi, C. Fuchs, P. Gohil, C. M. Greenfield, R. J. Groebner, L. L. Lao, T. C. Luce, M. A. Makowski, G. R. McKee, R. A. Moyer, C. C. Petty, M. Porkolab, C. L. Rettig, T. L. Rhodes, J. C. Rost, B. W. Stal...

    2001

  24. [32]

    Sakamoto, H

    Y. Sakamoto, H. Shirai, T. Fujita, S. Ide, T. Takizuka, N. Oyama, and Y. Kamada, Plasma Physics and Con- trolled Fusion 46, A299 (2004)

    2004

  25. [33]

    Suttrop, V

    W. Suttrop, V. Hyn¨ onen, T. Kurki-Suonio, P. Lang, M. Maraschek, R. Neu, A. St¨ abler, G. Conway, S. Hac- quin, M. Kempenaars, P. Lomas, M. Nave, R. Pitts, K.-D. Zastrow, the ASDEX Upgrade team, and con- tributors to the JET-EFDA workprogramme, Nuclear Fusion 45, 721 (2005)

    2005

  26. [34]

    Garofalo, W

    A. Garofalo, W. Solomon, J.-K. Park, K. Burrell, J. De- Boo, M. Lanctot, G. McKee, H. Reimerdes, L. Schmitz, M. Schaffer, and P. Snyder, Nuclear Fusion 51, 083018 (2011)

    2011

  27. [35]

    D. R. Ernst, A. Bortolon, C. S. Chang, S. Ku, F. Scotti, H. Q. Wang, Z. Yan, J. Chen, C. Chrystal, F. Glass, S. Haskey, R. Hood, F. Khabanov, F. Laggner, C. Las- nier, G. R. McKee, T. L. Rhodes, D. Truong, and J. Watkins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 235102 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    K. H. Burrell, K. Barada, X. Chen, A. M. Garofalo, R. J. Groebner, C. M. Muscatello, T. H. Osborne, C. C. Petty, T. L. Rhodes, P. B. Snyder, W. M. Solomon, Z. Yan, and L. Zeng, Physics of Plasmas 23, 056103 (2016)

    2016

  29. [37]

    X. Chen, K. H. Burrell, T. H. Osborne, K. Barada, N. M. Ferraro, A. M. Garofalo, R. J. Groebner, G. R. McKee, C. C. Petty, M. Porkolab, T. L. Rhodes, J. C. Rost, P. B. Snyder, W. M. Solomon, and Z. Yan, Nu- clear Fusion 57 (2017), 10.1088/1741-4326/aa7531

    2017 doi

  30. [38]

    Wilks, L

    T. Wilks, L. Morton, D. Kriete, M. Knolker, P. Sny- der, K. Barada, C. Paz-Soldan, T. Rhodes, K. Burrell, X. Chen, et al. , Nuclear Fusion 61, 036032 (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    Houshmandyar, K

    S. Houshmandyar, K. Burrell, B. Grierson, J. Mc- Clenaghan, G. Staebler, C. Chrystal, M. Halfmoon, D. Hatch, L. Zeng, and M. Austin, Nuclear Fusion 62, 056024 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    A. Kirk, E. Nardon, R. Akers, M. B´ ecoulet, G. D. Temmerman, B. Dudson, B. Hnat, Y. Liu, R. Martin, P. Tamain, D. Taylor, and the MAST team, Nuclear Fusion 50, 034008 (2010). 20

    2010

  33. [41]

    A. W. Degeling, Y. R. Martin, J. B. Lister, L. Villard, V. N. Dokouka, V. E. Lukash, and R. R. Khayrutdinov, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 45, 1637 (2003)

    2003

  34. [42]

    T. E. Evans, R. A. Moyer, P. R. Thomas, J. G. Watkins, T. H. Osborne, J. A. Boedo, E. J. Doyle, M. E. Fen- stermacher, K. H. Finken, R. J. Groebner, M. Groth, J. H. Harris, R. J. La Haye, C. J. Lasnier, S. Masuzaki, N. Ohyabu, D. G. Pretty, T. L. Rhodes, H. Reimerdes, D. L. Ru...

    2004

  35. [43]

    L. Yao, Y. Zhou, J. Cao, B. Feng, Z. Feng, J. Luo, J. Dong, L. Yan, W. Hong, K. Li, Z. Cui, Y. Liu, E. Wang, J. Yan, and H.-M. Team, Nuclear Fusion 41, 817 (2001)

    2001

  36. [44]

    Jardin, C

    S. Jardin, C. Bathke, D. Ehst, S. Kaye, C. Kessel, B. Lee, T. Mau, J. Menard, R. Miller, and F. Na- jmabadi, Fusion Engineering and Design48, 281 (2000)

    2000

  37. [45]

    Kikuchi, T

    M. Kikuchi, T. Takizuka, S. Medvedev, T. Ando, D. Chen, J. X. Li, M. Austin, O. Sauter, L. Villard, A. Merle, et al. , Nuclear Fusion 59, 056017 (2019)

    2019

  38. [46]

    Paz-Soldan, C

    C. Paz-Soldan, C. Chrystal, P. Lunia, A. Nelson, K. Thome, M. Austin, T. Cote, A. Hyatt, N. Leuthold, A. Marinoni, T. Osborne, M. Pharr, O. Sauter, F. Scotti, T. Wilks, and H. Wilson, Nuclear Fusion 64, 094002 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    P¨ utterich, R

    T. P¨ utterich, R. Dux, M. Janzer, R. McDermott, A. U. Team, et al. , Journal of Nuclear Materials 415, S334 (2011)

    2011

  40. [48]

    Snyder, J

    P. Snyder, J. M. Park, H. Wilson, C. Collins, E. Hassan, J. Hughes, M. Knolker, T. Osborne, J. Parisi, M. Shafer, et al., Bulletin of the American Physical Society (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    Experimental observations of bi- furcated power decay lengths in the near scrape-off layer of tokamak plasmas,

    X. Zhang, C. Marsden, M. Moscheni, E. Maartensson, A. Rengle, M. Robinson, T. OGorman, H. F. Lowe, E. Vekshina, S. Janhunen, P. F. Buxton, M. Sertoli, M. Romanelli, A. Scarabosio, T. K. Gray, N. A. Lopez, and the ST40 Team, “Experimental observations of bi- furcated power deca...

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Chang, S

    C. Chang, S. Ku, R. Hager, J. Choi, D. Pugmire, S. Klasky, A. Loarte, and R. Pitts, Nuclear Fusion 64, 056041 (2024)

    2024

  43. [51]

    D. D. Ryutov, Physics of Plasmas 14, 064502 (2007)

    2007

  44. [52]

    Kotschenreuther, P

    M. Kotschenreuther, P. Valanju, S. Mahajan, L. Zheng, L. Pearlstein, R. Bulmer, J. Canik, and R. Maingi, Nuclear Fusion 50, 035003 (2010)

    2010

  45. [53]

    Kotschenreuther, P

    M. Kotschenreuther, P. Valanju, B. Covele, and S. Ma- hajan, Physics of Plasmas 20, 102507 (2013)

    2013

  46. [54]

    First demonstra- tion of super-x divertor exhaust control for transient heat load management in compact fusion reactors,

    B. Kool, K. Verhaegh, G. L. Derks, T. A. Wijkamp, N. Lonigro, R. Doyle, G. McArdle, C. Vincent, J. Lovell, F. Federici, S. S. Henderson, R. T. Osawa, D. Brida, H. Reimerdes, M. van Berkel, T. E. tokamak exploita- tion team, and the MAST-U team, “First demonstra- tion of super-...

    2024 arXiv

  47. [55]

    P. Lang, G. Conway, T. Eich, L. Fattorini, O. Gru- ber, S. G¨ unter, L. Horton, S. Kalvin, A. Kallen- bach, M. Kaufmann, G. Kocsis, A. Lorenz, M. Manso, M. Maraschek, V. Mertens, J. Neuhauser, I. Nunes, W. Schneider, W. Suttrop, H. Urano, and the ASDEX Upgrade Team, Nuclear Fu...

    2004

  48. [56]

    A. R. Field, S. Aleiferis, ´E. Belonohy, P. Carvalho, I. Coffey, D. Frigione, L. Garzotti, L. Horvath, H.- T. Kim, M. Lennholm, E. Lerche, P. Lomas, C. G. Lowry, J. Mailloux, F. Rimini, C. M. Roach, M. Sertoli, ˇZ. ˇStancar, G. Szepesi, D. van Eester, and J. Contribu- tors, Pl...

    2021

  49. [57]

    Morley, S

    N. Morley, S. Smolentsev, R. Munipalli, M.-J. Ni, D. Gao, and M. Abdou, Fusion Engineering and De- sign 72, 3 (2004)

    2004

  50. [58]

    Horacek, J

    J. Horacek, J. Cecrdle, D. Tskhakaya, R. Dejarnac, J. Schwartz, M. Komm, J. Cavalier, J. Adamek, S. Lukes, V. Veselovsky, J. Varju, P. Barton, S. Entler, Y. Gasparyan, E. Gauthier, J. Gerardin, J. Hromadka, M. Hron, M. Iafrati, M. Imrisek, M. Jerab, K. Kovarik, G. Mazzitelli, ...

    2021

  51. [59]

    Maingi and A

    R. Maingi and A. Khodak, in Fusion Energy Technology R&D Priorities (Elsevier, 2025) pp. 171–177

    2025

  52. [60]

    P. B. Snyder, N. Aiba, M. Beurskens, R. J. Groeb- ner, L. D. Horton, A. E. Hubbard, J. W. Hughes, G. T. Huysmans, Y. Kamada, A. Kirk, C. Konz, A. W. Leonard, J. L¨ onnroth, C. F. Maggi, R. Maingi, T. H. Os- borne, N. Oyama, A. Pankin, S. Saarelma, G. Saibene, J. L. Terry, H. U...

    2009

  53. [61]

    Parisi, W

    J. Parisi, W. Guttenfelder, A. Nelson, R. Gaur, A. Kleiner, M. Lampert, G. Avdeeva, J. Berkery, C. Clauser, M. Curie, A. Diallo, W. Dorland, S. Kaye, J. McClenaghan, and F. Parra, Nuclear Fusion 64, 054002 (2024)

    2024

  54. [62]

    Kotschenreuther, X

    M. Kotschenreuther, X. Liu, S. M. Mahajan, D. R. Hatch, and G. Merlo, Nuclear Fusion64, 076033 (2024)

    2024

  55. [63]

    P. B. Snyder, H. R. Wilson, J. R. Ferron, L. L. Lao, A. W. Leonard, T. H. Osborne, A. D. Turnbull, D. Mossessian, M. Murakami, and X. Q. Xu, Physics of Plasmas 9, 2037 (2002)

    2002

  56. [64]

    P. B. Snyder, R. J. Groebner, J. W. Hughes, T. H. Os- borne, M. Beurskens, A. W. Leonard, H. R. Wilson, and X. Q. Xu, Nuclear Fusion 51, 103016 (2011)

    2011

  57. [65]

    M. N. Beurskens, T. H. Osborne, P. A. Schneider, E. Wolfrum, L. Frassinetti, R. Groebner, P. Lomas, I. Nunes, S. Saarelma, R. Scannell, P. B. Snyder, D. Zarzoso, I. Balboa, B. Bray, M. Brix, J. Flanagan, C. Giroud, E. Giovannozzi, M. Kempenaars, A. Loarte, E. D. L. Luna, G. Ma...

    2011

  58. [66]

    J. R. Walk, P. B. Snyder, J. W. Hughes, J. L. Terry, A. E. Hubbard, and P. E. Phillips, Nuclear Fusion 52, 063011 (2012)

    2012

  59. [67]

    M. J. Leyland, M. N. Beurskens, L. Frassinetti, T. Os- borne, P. B. Snyder, C. Giroud, S. Jachmich, G. Mad- dison, P. Lomas, C. Perez Von Thun, S. Saarelma, G. Saibene, and K. J. Gibson, Nuclear Fusion 53 (2013)

    2013

  60. [68]

    J. W. Connor, R. J. Hastie, and J. B. Taylor, Proc R Soc London Ser A 365, 3651 (1979)

    1979

  61. [69]

    W. M. Tang, J. W. Connor, and R. J. Hastie, Nuclear Fusion 20, 1439 (1980)

    1980

  62. [70]

    R. J. Hastie and K. W. Hesketh, Nuclear Fusion 21 (1981)

    1981

  63. [71]

    J. Dong, L. Chen, and F. Zonca, Nuclear Fusion 39 (1999). 21

    1999

  64. [72]

    M. J. Pueschel, M. Kammerer, and F. Jenko, Physics of Plasmas 15 (2008)

    2008

  65. [73]

    Coury, W

    M. Coury, W. Guttenfelder, D. R. Mikkelsen, J. M. Canik, G. P. Canal, A. Diallo, S. Kaye, G. J. Kramer, and R. Maingi, Physics of Plasmas 23 (2016), 10.1063/1.4954911

    2016 doi

  66. [74]

    C. H. Ma and X. Q. Xu, Nuclear Fusion 57 (2017)

    2017

  67. [75]

    Aleynikova, A

    K. Aleynikova, A. Zocco, P. Xanthopoulos, P. He- lander, and C. N¨ uhrenberg, Journal of Plasma Physics 84 (2018)

    2018

  68. [76]

    Lortz, Nuclear Fusion 15, 49 (1975)

    D. Lortz, Nuclear Fusion 15, 49 (1975)

    1975

  69. [77]

    J. W. Connor, R. J. Hastie, H. R. Wilson, and R. L. Miller, Physics of Plasmas 5, 2687 (1998)

    1998

  70. [78]

    H. R. Wilson, J. W. Connor, A. R. Field, S. J. Field- ing, R. L. Miller, L. L. Lao, J. R. Ferron, and A. D. Turnbull, Physics of Plasmas 6 (1999)

    1999

  71. [79]

    T. Eich, P. Manz, and the ASDEX Upgrade team, Nu- clear Fusion 61, 086017 (2021)

    2021

  72. [80]

    T. Eich, T. Body, M. Faitsch, O. Grover, M. A. Miller, P. Manz, T. Looby, A. Q. Kuang, A. Redl, M. Reinke, et al. , arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.13539 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Determination of confinement regime boundaries via separatrix parameters on alcator c-mod based on a model for interchange-drift-alfv´ en turbulence,

    M. A. Miller, J. W. Hughes, T. Eich, G. R. Tynan, P. Manz, T. Body, D. Silvagni, O. Grover, A. E. Hub- bard, A. Cavallaro, M. Wigram, A. Q. Kuang, S. Mordi- jck, B. LaBombard, J. Dunsmore, and D. Whyte, “Determination of confinement regime boundaries via separatrix parameters ...

    2024 arXiv

  74. [82]

    J. F. Parisi, A. O. Nelson, R. Gaur, S. M. Kaye, F. I. Parra, J. W. Berkery, K. Barada, C. Clauser, A. J. Creely, A. Diallo, W. Guttenfelder, J. W. Hughes, L. A. Kogan, A. Kleiner, A. Q. Kuang, M. Lampert, T. Macwan, J. E. Menard, and M. A. Miller, Physics of Plasmas 31, 030702 (2024)

    2024

  75. [83]

    R. J. Goldston, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 26, 87 (1984)

    1984

  76. [84]

    Kaye and R

    S. Kaye and R. Goldston, Nuclear Fusion 25, 65 (1985)

    1985

  77. [85]

    Waltz and R

    R. Waltz and R. Miller, Physics of Plasmas 6, 4265 (1999)

    1999

  78. [86]

    Kinsey, R

    J. Kinsey, R. Waltz, and J. Candy, Physics of Plasmas 14 (2007)

    2007

  79. [87]

    E. A. Belli, G. W. Hammett, and W. Dorland, Physics of Plasmas 15, 092303 (2008)

    2008

  80. [88]

    Angelino, X

    P. Angelino, X. Garbet, L. Villard, A. Bottino, S. Jol- liet, P. Ghendrih, V. Grandgirard, B. F. McMillan, Y. Sarazin, G. Dif-Pradalier, et al. , Physical Review Letters 102, 195002 (2009)

    2009

  81. [89]

    Marinoni, S

    A. Marinoni, S. Brunner, Y. Camenen, S. Coda, J. P. Graves, X. Lapillonne, A. Pochelon, O. Sauter, and L. Villard, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 51, 055016 (2009)

    2009

  82. [90]

    Jolliet, F

    S. Jolliet, F. D. Halpern, J. Loizu, A. Mosetto, and P. Ricci, Physics of Plasmas 21 (2014)

    2014

  83. [91]

    Ball and F

    J. Ball and F. I. Parra, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 57, 035006 (2015)

    2015

  84. [92]

    P. B. Snyder, W. M. Solomon, K. H. Burrell, A. M. Garofalo, B. A. Grierson, R. J. Groebner, A. W. Leonard, R. Nazikian, T. H. Osborne, E. A. Belli, J. Candy, and H. R. Wilson, Nuclear Fusion 55 (2015)

    2015

  85. [93]

    Merle, O

    A. Merle, O. Sauter, and S. Y. Medvedev, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 59, 104001 (2017)

    2017

  86. [94]

    F. Riva, C. Tsui, J. Boedo, P. Ricci, T. Team, et al. , Physics of Plasmas 27 (2020)

    2020

  87. [95]

    A. O. Nelson, L. Schmitz, T. Cote, J. F. Parisi, S. Stewart, C. Paz-Soldan, K. E. Thome, M. E. Austin, F. Scotti, J. L. Barr, A. Hyatt, N. Leuthold, A. Mari- noni, T. Neiser, T. Osborne, N. Richner, A. S. Welander, W. P. Wehner, R. Wilcox, T. M. Wilks, J. Yang, and the DIII-D ...

    2024

  88. [96]

    Nelson, C

    A. Nelson, C. Vincent, H. Anand, J. Lovell, J. Parisi, H. Wilson, K. Imada, W. Wehner, M. Kochan, S. Black- more, G. McArdle, S. Guizzo, L. Rondini, S. Freiberger, C. Paz-Soldan, and the MAST-U Team, Nuclear Fusion 64, 124004 (2024)

    2024

  89. [97]

    Mariani, L

    A. Mariani, L. Aucone, A. Balestri, P. Mantica, G. Merlo, R. Ambrosino, F. Bagnato, L. Balbinot, J. Ball, T. Bolzonella, D. Brioschi, I. Casiraghi, A. Castaldo, S. Coda, L. Frassinetti, V. Fusco, T. Hap- pel, J. Hobirk, P. Innocente, R. McDermott, P. Mus- cente, T. P¨ utterich...

    2024

  90. [98]

    Balestri, J

    A. Balestri, J. Ball, S. Coda, D. J. Cruz-Zabala, M. Garcia-Munoz, and E. Viezzer, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 66, 075012 (2024)

    2024

  91. [99]

    H. Sun, J. Ball, S. Brunner, and A. Volˇ cokas, Nuclear Fusion 64, 036026 (2024)

    2024

  92. [100]

    Y. K. Peng and D. J. Strickler, Nuclear Fusion 26 (1986)

    1986

  93. [101]

    Harrison, R

    J. Harrison, R. Akers, S. Allan, J. Allcock, J. Allen, L. Appel, M. Barnes, N. B. Ayed, W. Boeglin, C. Bow- man, J. Bradley, P. Browning, P. Bryant, M. Carr, M. Cecconello, C. Challis, S. Chapman, I. Chapman, G. Colyer, S. Conroy, N. Conway, M. Cox, G. Cun- ningham, R. Dendy, ...

    2019

  94. [102]

    Doyle, D

    S. Doyle, D. Lopez-Aires, A. Mancini, M. Agredano- Torres, J. Garcia-Sanchez, J. Segado-Fernandez, J. Ayllon-Guerola, M. Garcia-Mu˜ noz, E. Viezzer, C. Soria-Hoyo, J. Garcia-Lopez, G. Cunningham, P. Buxton, M. Gryaznevich, Y. Hwang, and K. Chung, Fusion Engineering and Design ...

    2021

  95. [103]

    A. C. Sontag, M. W. Bongard, M. T. Borchardt, S. J. Diem, R. J. Fonck, A. K. Keyhani, B. A. Kujak- Ford, B. T. Lewicki, M. D. Nornberg, A. C. Palmer, C. Pierren, J. A. Reusch, A. T. Rhodes, N. J. Richner, C. Rodriguez-Sanchez, C. E. Schaefer, J. D. Weberski, and G. R. Winz, IE...

    2022

  96. [104]

    Berkery, P

    J. Berkery, P. Adebayo-Ige, H. A. Khawaldeh, G. Avdeeva, S.-G. Baek, S. Banerjee, K. Barada, D. Battaglia, R. Bell, E. Belli, E. Belova, N. Bertelli, N. Bisai, P. Bonoli, M. Boyer, J. Butt, J. Candy, C. Chang, C. Clauser, L. C. Rivera, M. Curie, P. de Vries, R. Diab, A. Diallo...

    2024

  97. [105]

    The spherical tokamak for energy production: theme issue introduc- tion,

    I. Chapman, S. Cowley, and H. Wilson, “The spherical tokamak for energy production: theme issue introduc- tion,” (2024)

    2024

  98. [106]

    McNamara, A

    S. McNamara, A. Alieva, M. A. Tzanis, O. Asunta, J. Bland, H. Bohlin, P. Buxton, C. Colgan, A. Dne- strovskii, E. du Toit, M. Fontana, M. Gemmell, M. Gryaznevich, J. Hakosalo, M. Hardman, D. Harry- man, D. Hoffman, M. Iliasova, S. Janhunen, F. Janky, J. Lister, H. Lowe, E. Maa...

    2024

  99. [107]

    Implications of vertical stability control on the sparc tokamak,

    A. O. Nelson, D. T. Garnier, D. J. Battaglia, C. Paz- Soldan, I. Stewart, M. Reinke, A. J. Creely, and J. Wai, “Implications of vertical stability control on the sparc tokamak,” (2024), arXiv:2401.09613

    2024 arXiv

  100. [108]

    Nelson, C

    A. Nelson, C. Paz-Soldan, and S. Saarelma, Nuclear Fusion 62, 096020 (2022)

    2022

  101. [109]

    A. D. Turnbull, Y. R. Lin-Liu, R. L. Miller, T. S. Taylor, and T. N. Todd, Physics of Plasmas 6, 1113 (1999)

    1999

  102. [110]

    Parisi, A

    J. Parisi, A. Nelson, W. Guttenfelder, R. Gaur, J. Berk- ery, S. Kaye, K. Barada, C. Clauser, A. Diallo, D. Hatch, A. Kleiner, M. Lampert, T. Macwan, and J. Menard, Nuclear Fusion 64, 086034 (2024)

    2024

  103. [111]

    Joiner and W

    N. Joiner and W. Dorland, Physics of Plasmas 17 (2010)

    2010

  104. [112]

    J. R. Ferron, M. S. Chu, G. L. Jackson, L. L. Lao, R. L. Miller, T. H. Osborne, P. B. Snyder, E. J. Strait, T. S. Taylor, A. D. Turnbull, A. M. Garofalo, M. A. Makowski, B. W. Rice, M. S. Chance, L. R. Baylor, M. Murakami, and M. R. Wade, Physics of Plasmas 7 (2000)

    2000

  105. [113]

    L. Lao, Y. Kamada, T. Oikawa, L. R. Baylor, K. Burrell, V. Chan, M. Chance, M. Chu, J. Ferron, T. Fukuda, et al. , Nuclear fusion 41, 295 (2001)

    2001

  106. [114]

    A. W. Leonard, T. A. Casper, R. J. Groebner, T. H. Osborne, P. B. Snyder, and D. M. Thomas (2007)

    2007

  107. [115]

    Imada, T

    K. Imada, T. H. Osborne, S. Saarelma, J. G. Clark, A. Kirk, M. Knolker, R. Scannell, P. B. Snyder, V. C., and H. R. Wilson, Nuclear Fusion (2024)

    2024

  108. [116]

    C. T. Holcomb, J. R. Ferron, T. C. Luce, T. W. Petrie, P. A. Politzer, C. Challis, J. C. Deboo, E. J. Doyle, C. M. Greenfield, R. J. Groebner, M. Groth, A. W. Hyatt, G. L. Jackson, C. Kessel, R. J. L. Haye, M. A. Makowski, G. R. McKee, M. Murakami, T. H. Osborne, J. M. Park, R...

    2009

  109. [117]

    T. Mau, S. Jardin, C. Kessel, J. Menard, R. Miller, F. Najmabadi, V. Chan, L. Lao, T. Petrie, P. Politzer, and A. Turnbull, in 18th IEEE/NPSS Symposium on Fusion Engineering (1999) pp. 45–48

    1999

  110. [118]

    Jardin, C

    S. Jardin, C. Kessel, J. Menard, T. Mau, R. Miller, F. Najmabadi, V. Chan, L. Lao, Y. Linliu, R. Miller, T. Petrie, P. Politzer, and A. Turnbull, Fusion Engi- neering and Design 65, 165 (2003)

    2003

  111. [119]

    Bromberg, S

    L. Bromberg, S. Pourrahimi, J. H. Schultz, P. Titus, S. Jardin, C. Kessel, and W. Reiersen, Fusion Engi- neering and Design 65 (2003)

    2003

  112. [120]

    D. A. Gates, J. R. Ferron, M. Bell, T. Gibney, R. John- son, R. J. Marsala, D. Mastrovito, J. E. Menard, D. Mueller, B. Penaflor, S. A. Sabbagh, and T. Steven- son, Nuclear Fusion 46 (2006)

    2006

  113. [121]

    Kolemen, D

    E. Kolemen, D. A. Gates, S. Gerhardt, R. Kaita, H. Kugel, D. Mueller, C. Rowley, and V. Soukhanovskii, Nuclear Fusion 51 (2011)

    2011

  114. [122]

    Ariola and A

    M. Ariola and A. Pironti, Magnetic Control of Tokamak Plasmas (Springer, 2016)

    2016

  115. [123]

    Degrave, F

    J. Degrave, F. Felici, J. Buchli, M. Neunert, B. Tracey, F. Carpanese, T. Ewalds, R. Hafner, A. Abdolmaleki, D. de las Casas, C. Donner, L. Fritz, C. Galperti, A. Hu- ber, J. Keeling, M. Tsimpoukelli, J. Kay, A. Merle, J. M. Moret, S. Noury, F. Pesamosca, D. Pfau, O. Sauter, C...

    2022

  116. [124]

    J. E. Menard, T. Brown, L. El-Guebaly, M. Boyer, J. Canik, B. Colling, R. Raman, Z. Wang, Y. Zhai, P. Buxton, B. Covele, C. D’Angelo, A. Davis, S. Ger- hardt, M. Gryaznevich, M. Harb, T. C. Hender, S. Kaye, D. Kingham, M. Kotschenreuther, S. Maha- jan, R. Maingi, E. Marriott, ...

    2016

  117. [125]

    J. F. Parisi, J. W. Berkery, A. Sladkomedova, S. Guizzo, M. R. Hardman, J. R. Ball, A. O. Nelson, S. M. Kaye, M. Anastopoulos-Tzanis, S. A. M. McNamara, 23 J. Dominski, S. Janhunen, M. Romanelli, D. Dickinson, A. Diallo, A. Dnestrovskii, W. Guttenfelder, C. Hansen, O. Myatra, ...

    2025

  118. [126]

    C. V. Atanasiu, S. G¨ unter, K. Lackner, and I. G. Miron, Physics of Plasmas 11, 3510 (2004)

    2004

  119. [127]

    J. P. Freidberg, Ideal MHD (Cambridge University Press, 2014)

    2014

  120. [128]

    D. Told, F. Jenko, P. Xanthopoulos, L. D. Horton, E. Wolfrum, and A. U. Team, Physics of Plasmas 15, 102306 (2008)

    2008

  121. [129]

    E. Wang, X. Xu, J. Candy, R. Groebner, P. Snyder, Y. Chen, S. Parker, W. Wan, G. Lu, and J. Dong, Nuclear Fusion 52, 103015 (2012)

    2012

  122. [130]

    Dickinson, C

    D. Dickinson, C. M. Roach, S. Saarelma, R. Scannell, A. Kirk, and H. R. Wilson, Physical Review Letters 108, 135002 (2012)

    2012

  123. [131]

    Saarelma, M

    S. Saarelma, M. Beurskens, D. Dickinson, L. Frassinetti, M. Leyland, C. Roach, and E.-J. Contributors, Nuclear Fusion 53, 123012 (2013)

    2013

  124. [132]

    D. P. Fulton, Z. Lin, I. Holod, and Y. Xiao, Physics of Plasmas 21, 042110 (2014)

    2014

  125. [133]

    D. R. Hatch, M. Kotschenreuther, S. Mahajan, P. Valanju, F. Jenko, D. Told, T. G¨ orler, and S. Saarelma, Nuclear Fusion 56, 104003 (2016)

    2016

  126. [134]

    J. F. Parisi, F. I. Parra, C. M. Roach, C. Giroud, W. Dorland, D. R. Hatch, M. Barnes, J. Hillesheim, N. Aiba, J. Ball, and P. G. Ivanov, Nuclear Fusion 60, 126045 (2020)

    2020

  127. [135]

    D. R. Hatch, M. Kotschenreuther, S. M. Mahajan, M. J. Pueschel, C. Michoski, G. Merlo, E. Hassan, A. R. Field, L. Frassinetti, C. Giroud, J. C. Hillesheim, C. F. Maggi, C. P. Von Thun, C. M. Roach, S. Saarelma, D. Jarema, and F. Jenko, Nuclear Fusion 61, 036015 (2021)

    2021

  128. [136]

    Belli, J

    E. Belli, J. Candy, and I. Sfiligoi, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 65, 024001 (2022)

    2022

  129. [137]

    Chapman-Oplopoiou, D

    B. Chapman-Oplopoiou, D. Hatch, A. Field, L. Frassinetti, J. Hillesheim, L. Horvath, C. Maggi, J. Parisi, C. Roach, S. Saarelma, J. Walker, and J. Contributors, Nuclear Fusion 62, 086028 (2022)

    2022

  130. [138]

    Leppin, T

    L. Leppin, T. G¨ orler, M. Cavedon, M. Dunne, E. Wol- frum, and F. Jenko, Journal of Plasma Physics 89, 905890605 (2023)

    2023

  131. [139]

    Walker and D

    J. Walker and D. R. Hatch, Physics of Plasmas 30 (2023)

    2023

  132. [140]

    Predebon, D

    I. Predebon, D. Hatch, L. Frassinetti, L. Horvath, S. Saarelma, B. Chapman-Oplopoiou, T. G¨ orler, C. Maggi, and J. Contributors, Nuclear Fusion 63, 036010 (2023)

    2023

  133. [141]

    J. Chen, X. Jian, D. Brower, S. Haskey, Z. Yan, R. Groebner, H. Wang, T. Rhodes, F. Laggner, W. Ding, et al. , Nuclear Fusion 63, 066019 (2023)

    2023

  134. [142]

    P.-Y. Li, D. Hatch, B. Chapman-Oplopoiou, S. Saarelma, C. Roach, M. Kotschenreuther, S. Maha- jan, G. Merlo, and the MAST Team, Nuclear Fusion 64, 016040 (2023)

    2023

  135. [143]

    Hatch, M

    D. Hatch, M. Kotschenreuther, P.-Y. Li, B. Chapman- Oplopoiou, J. Parisi, S. Mahajan, and R. Groebner, Nuclear Fusion 64, 066007 (2024)

    2024

  136. [144]

    Farcas, G

    I.-G. Farcas, G. Merlo, and F. Jenko, Journal of Plasma Physics 90 (2024), 10.1017/S0022377824001314

    2024 doi

  137. [145]

    X. Jian, J. Chen, C. Holland, V. Chan, X. Zhang, G. Yu, and Z. Yan, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 66, 045008 (2024)

    2024

  138. [146]

    Dominski, W

    J. Dominski, W. Guttenfelder, D. Hatch, T. Goerler, F. Jenko, S. Munaretto, and S. Kaye, Physics of Plas- mas 31 (2024)

    2024

  139. [147]

    P. J. Catto, Plasma Physics 20, 719 (1978)

    1978

  140. [148]

    E. A. Frieman and L. Chen, The Physics of Fluids 25, 502 (1982)

    1982

  141. [149]

    Sugama and W

    H. Sugama and W. Horton, Physics of Plasmas 5, 2560 (1998)

    1998

  142. [150]

    F. I. Parra and P. J. Catto, Plasma Physics and Con- trolled Fusion 50, 065014 (2008)

    2008

  143. [151]

    I. G. Abel, G. G. Plunk, E. Wang, M. Barnes, S. C. Cowley, W. Dorland, and A. A. Schekochihin, Reports on Progress in Physics 76, 116201 (2013)

    2013

  144. [152]

    Dorland, F

    W. Dorland, F. Jenko, M. Kotschenreuther, and B. N. Rogers, Physical Review Letters 85, 5579 (2000)

    2000

  145. [153]

    Candy, E

    J. Candy, E. Belli, and R. Bravenec, Journal of Com- putational Physics 324, 73 (2016)

    2016

  146. [154]

    Kotschenreuther, X

    M. Kotschenreuther, X. Liu, D. R. Hatch, S. Mahajan, L. Zheng, A. Diallo, R. Groebner, J. C. Hillesheim, C. F. Maggi, C. Giroud, F. Koechl, V. Parail, S. Saarelma, E. Solano, A. Chankin, A. Chankin, and J. Contribu- tors, Nuclear Fusion 59, 096001 (2019)

    2019

  147. [155]

    R. L. Miller, Y. R. Lin-Liu, A. D. Turnbull, V. S. Chan, L. D. Pearlstein, O. Sauter, and L. Villard, Physics of Plasmas 4, 973 (1997)

    1997

  148. [156]

    J. M. Greene and M. S. Chance, Nuclear Fusion 21 (1981)

    1981

  149. [157]

    H. R. Wilson and S. C. Cowley, Physical Review Letters 92 (2004)

    2004

  150. [158]

    P. B. Snyder, R. J. Groebner, A. W. Leonard, T. H. Osborne, and H. R. Wilson, Physics of Plasmas 16, 056118 (2009)

    2009

  151. [159]

    Kleiner, N

    A. Kleiner, N. M. Ferraro, A. Diallo, and G. P. Canal, Nuclear Fusion 61 (2021)

    2021

  152. [160]

    Imada, T

    K. Imada, T. H. Osborne, S. Saarelma, A. Kirk, S. Blackmore, M. Kn¨ olker, R. Scannell, P. B. Snyder, C. Vincent, and H. R. Wilson, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion (2024)

    2024

  153. [161]

    Snyder, H

    P. Snyder, H. Wilson, J. Ferron, L. Lao, A. Leonard, D. Mossessian, M. Murakami, T. Osborne, A. Turnbull, and X. Xu, Nuclear fusion 44, 320 (2004)

    2004

  154. [162]

    Nystr¨ om, L

    H. Nystr¨ om, L. Frassinetti, S. Saarelma, G. Huijsmans, C. P. von Thun, C. Maggi, J. Hillesheim, et al., Nuclear Fusion 62, 126045 (2022)

    2022

  155. [163]

    Kleiner, N

    A. Kleiner, N. Ferraro, G. Canal, A. Diallo, and R. Maingi, Nuclear Fusion 62, 076018 (2022)

    2022

  156. [164]

    Felici et al

    F. Felici et al. , Nuclear Fusion 51, 083052 (2011)

    2011

  157. [165]

    L. L. Lao, S. Kruger, C. Akcay, P. Balaprakash, T. A. Bechtel, E. Howell, J. Koo, J. Leddy, M. Lein- hauser, Y. Q. Liu, S. Madireddy, J. McClenaghan, D. Orozco, A. Pankin, D. Schissel, S. Smith, X. Sun, and S. Williams, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 64, 074001 (2022)

    2022

  158. [166]

    Cˆ andido and R

    J. Cˆ andido and R. Jorge,Design of quasisymmetric fu- sion devices using novel machine learning methods , Mas- ter’s thesis, Universidade De Lisboa (2023)

    2023

  159. [167]

    Rea et al

    C. Rea et al. , Nature Communications 10, 1 (2019)

    2019

  160. [168]

    A. Ho, J. Citrin, F. Auriemma, C. Bourdelle, F. J. Cas- son, H.-T. Kim, P. Manas, G. Szepesi, H. Weisen, and J. Contributors, Nuclear Fusion 59, 056007 (2019)

    2019

  161. [169]

    J. Vega, A. Murari, S. Dormido-Canto, G. A. Ratt´ a, and M. Gelfusa, Nature Physics 18, 741 (2022)

    2022

  162. [170]

    Sabbagh, J

    S. Sabbagh, J. Berkery, Y. Park, J. Butt, J. Riquezes, J. Bak, R. Bell, L. Delgado-Aparicio, S. Gerhardt, 24 C. Ham, et al. , Physics of Plasmas 30 (2023)

    2023

  163. [171]

    Gambrioli, L

    M. Gambrioli, L. Piron, A. Pau, G. Cunningham, C. Piron, D. Ryan, P. Martin, team the MAST-U, and T. E. T. the EUROfusion, Plasma Physics and Con- trolled Fusion 67, 045007 (2025)

    2025

  164. [172]

    M. D. Boyer and J. Chadwick, Nuclear Fusion 61, 046024 (2021)

    2021

  165. [173]

    Abbate, R

    J. Abbate, R. Conlin, and E. Kolemen, Nuclear Fusion 61, 046027 (2021)

    2021

  166. [174]

    Dubbioso, G

    S. Dubbioso, G. De Tommasi, A. Mele, G. Tartaglione, M. Ariola, and A. Pironti, Fusion Engineering and De- sign 194, 113725 (2023)

    2023

  167. [175]

    Ma et al

    Y. Ma et al. , Physics of Plasmas 27, 042305 (2020)

    2020

  168. [176]

    K. L. van de Plassche, J. Citrin, C. Bourdelle, Y. Came- nen, F. J. Casson, V. I. Dagnelie, F. Felici, A. Ho, S. Van Mulders, and J. Contributors, Physics of Plas- mas 27 (2020)

    2020

  169. [177]

    Wallace, Z

    G. Wallace, Z. Bai, R. Sadre, T. Perciano, N. Bertelli, S. Shiraiwa, E. Bethel, and J. Wright, Journal of Plasma Physics 88, 895880401 (2022)

    2022

  170. [178]

    S´ anchez-Villar, Z

    ´A. S´ anchez-Villar, Z. Bai, N. Bertelli, E. Bethel, J. Hillairet, T. Perciano, S. Shiraiwa, G. Wallace, and J. Wright, Nuclear Fusion 64, 096039 (2024)

    2024

  171. [179]

    Piccione, J

    A. Piccione, J. Berkery, S. Sabbagh, and Y. Andreopou- los, Nuclear Fusion 60, 046033 (2020)

    2020

  172. [180]

    Piccione, J

    A. Piccione, J. Berkery, S. Sabbagh, and Y. Andreopou- los, Nuclear Fusion 62, 036002 (2022)

    2022

  173. [181]

    D. R. Smith, R. J. Fonck, G. R. McKee, D. S. Thomp- son, R. E. Bell, A. Diallo, W. Guttenfelder, S. M. Kaye, B. P. Leblanc, and M. Podesta, Physics of Plasmas 20, 055903 (2013)

    2013

  174. [182]

    Meneghini, G

    O. Meneghini, G. Snoep, B. C. Lyons, J. McClenaghan, C. S. Imai, B. Grierson, S. P. Smith, G. M. Staebler, P. B. Snyder, J. Candy, E. Belli, L. Lao, J. M. Park, J. Citrin, T. L. Cordemiglia, A. Tema, and S. Mordijck, Nuclear Fusion 61 (2021)

    2021

  175. [183]

    A. Kit, A. E. J¨ arvinen, L. Frassinetti, and S. Wiesen, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 65 (2023), 10.1088/1361-6587/acb3f7

    2023 doi

  176. [184]

    van Leeuwen, M

    L. van Leeuwen, M. Schoukens, J. Citrin, M. van Berkel, B. Duval, A. Perek, and the TCV Team, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 67, 025024 (2025)

    2025

  177. [185]

    Pavone, A

    A. Pavone, A. Merlo, S. Kwak, and J. Svensson, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 65, 053001 (2023)

    2023

  178. [187]

    Hiped: Machine learning framework for spheri- cal tokamak pedestal prediction and optimization (https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.19861),

    J. Parisi, J. Clark, J. Berkery, C. Bowman, C. Fitzpatrick, S. Kaye, and M. Lampert, “Hiped: Machine learning framework for spheri- cal tokamak pedestal prediction and optimization (https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.19861),” (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  179. [188]

    Breiman, Machine Learning 45, 5 (2001)

    L. Breiman, Machine Learning 45, 5 (2001)

    2001

  180. [189]

    Liaw and M

    A. Liaw and M. Wiener, R News 2, 18 (2002)

    2002

  181. [190]

    D. R. Cutler, T. C. Edwards, K. H. Beard, A. Cutler, K. T. Hess, J. Gibson, and J. J. Lawler, Ecology 88, 2783 (2007)

    2007

  182. [191]

    Pal and P

    M. Pal and P. M. Mather, International Journal of Re- mote Sensing 26, 217 (2005)

    2005

  183. [192]

    Geurts, D

    P. Geurts, D. Ernst, and L. Wehenkel, Machine Learn- ing 63, 3 (2006)

    2006

  184. [193]

    R. Gaur, S. Buller, M. E. Ruth, M. Landreman, I. G. Abel, and W. D. Dorland, Journal of Plasma Physics 89, 905890518 (2023)

    2023

  185. [194]

    J. F. Parisi, F. I. Parra, C. M. Roach, M. R. Hard- man, A. A. Schekochihin, I. G. Abel, N. Aiba, J. Ball, M. Barnes, B. Chapman-Oplopoiou, D. Dickinson, W. Dorland, C. Giroud, D. Hatch, J. Hillesheim, J. R. Ruiz, S. Saarelma, D. St-Onge, and J. Contributors, Nuclear Fusion 62...

    2022

  186. [195]

    Meneghini, S

    O. Meneghini, S. Smith, P. Snyder, G. Staebler, J. Candy, E. Belli, L. Lao, M. Kostuk, T. Luce, T. Luda, J. Park, and F. Poli, Nuclear Fusion 57, 086034 (2017)

    2017

  187. [196]

    E. U. Zeger, F. M. Laggner, A. Bortolon, C. Rea, O. Meneghini, S. Saarelma, B. S. Sammuli, S. P. Smith, and J. Zhao, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science 49, 3212 (2021)

    2021

  188. [197]

    Gillgren, E

    A. Gillgren, E. Fransson, D. Yadykin, L. Frassinetti, P. Strand, and J. Contributors, Nuclear Fusion 62, 096006 (2022)

    2022

  189. [198]

    Gillgren, Machine learning applications for predicting the pedestal in tokamak plasmas , Ph.D

    A. Gillgren, Machine learning applications for predicting the pedestal in tokamak plasmas , Ph.D. thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Space, Earth and Environment (2023)

    2023

  190. [199]

    J¨ arvinen, A

    A. J¨ arvinen, A. Kit, A. Bruncrona, Y. Poels, S. Wiesen, V. Menkovski, L. Frassinetti, M. Dunne, S. Saarelma, J. Contributors, et al. , in 50th EPS Conference on Plasma Physics (European Physical Society, 2024)

    2024

  191. [200]

    Joung, D

    S. Joung, D. R. Smith, G. McKee, Z. Yan, K. Gill, J. Zimmerman, B. Geiger, R. Coffee, F. O’Shea, A. Jalalvand, et al. , Nuclear Fusion 64, 066038 (2024)

    2024

  192. [201]

    T. H. Osborne, G. L. Jackson, Z. Yan, R. Maingi, D. K. Mansfield, B. A. Grierson, C. P. Chrobak, A. G. McLean, S. L. Allen, D. J. Battaglia, A. R. Briesemeis- ter, M. E. Fenstermacher, G. R. McKee, and P. B. Snyder, Nuclear Fusion 55 (2015)

    2015

  193. [202]

    Sauter, S

    O. Sauter, S. Brunner, D. Kim, G. Merlo, R. Behn, Y. Camenen, S. Coda, B. P. Duval, L. Federspiel, T. P. Goodman, A. Karpushov, A. Merle, and T. Team, Physics of Plasmas 21, 055906 (2014)

    2014

  194. [203]

    Stroteich, P

    S. Stroteich, P. Xanthopoulos, G. Plunk, and R. Schnei- der, Journal of Plasma Physics 88, 175880501 (2022)

    2022

  195. [204]

    Roberg-Clark, G

    G. Roberg-Clark, G. Plunk, P. Xanthopoulos, C. N¨ uhrenberg, S. Henneberg, and H. Smith, Physical Review Research 5, L032030 (2023)

    2023

  196. [205]

    How does ion temperature gradient turbulence depend on magnetic geometry? insights from data and machine learning,

    M. Landreman, J. Y. Choi, C. Alves, P. Balaprakash, R. M. Churchill, R. Conlin, and G. Roberg-Clark, “How does ion temperature gradient turbulence depend on magnetic geometry? insights from data and machine learning,” (2025), arXiv:2502.11657

    2025 arXiv

  197. [206]

    Meneghini, S

    O. Meneghini, S. Smith, L. Lao, O. Izacard, Q. Ren, J. Park, J. Candy, Z. Wang, C. Luna, V. Izzo, B. Grier- son, P. Snyder, C. Holland, J. Penna, G. Lu, P. Raum, A. McCubbin, D. Orlov, E. Belli, N. Ferraro, R. Prater, T. Osborne, A. Turnbull, and G. Staebler, Nuclear Fu- sion ...

    2015

  198. [207]

    B. S. Patel, P. Hill, L. Pattinson, M. Giacomin, A. Bok- shi, D. Kennedy, H. G. Dudding, J. F. Parisi, T. F. Neiser, A. C. Jayalekshmi, D. Dickinson, and J. R. Ruiz, Journal of Open Source Software 9, 5866 (2024)

    2024

  199. [208]

    J. F. Parisi, A. O. Nelson, and R. Gaur, “gk ped,” (2023)

    2023

  200. [209]

    ideal-ballooning-solver,

    R. Gaur, “ideal-ballooning-solver,” (2023)

    2023

  201. [210]

    W. D. D’haeseleer, W. N. G. Hitchon, J. D. Callen, and J. L. Shohet, Flux Coordinates and Magnetic Field Structure : a Guide to a Fundamental Tool of Plasma Theory (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1991)

    1991

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.