Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 31 references

Effects of Random Birefringence in Multimode Fibers on Nonlinear Ultrashort Pulse Propagation

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Random birefringence in multimode fibers normally weakens nonlinearity, yet multimode solitons and high-power beam self-cleaning survive; the Raman soliton shift first drops then recovers as correlation length shrinks.

desk verdict Interesting numerical study, but the headline non-monotonicity rests on single realizations—needs ensemble statistics before I'd trust it. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.09557 v1 pith:3ILL7VKZ submitted 2025-05-14 physics.optics

Chaoyang Geng , Hengyu Liu , Lixia Xi , Xiaoguang Zhang , Xiaosheng Xiao This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords randombirefringencemultimodefiberssolitonssolitonself-frequencyshiftbeamself-cleaninggeneralizednonlinearSchrödingerequationRamaneffectcorrelationlength
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Random birefringence is the unavoidable polarization disorder in real multimode fibers, and this paper asks whether it spoils the nonlinear ultrashort-pulse effects that make short multimode fiber segments attractive. Simulating a vectorized generalized multimode nonlinear Schrödinger equation, the paper finds that birefringence generally reduces Kerr nonlinearity and spectral broadening. It then shows two headline effects survive in practical regimes: multimode solitons still form, and spatial beam self-cleaning withstands random birefringence when the input peak power is high. It also reports a nonmonotonic dependence of the Raman-induced soliton self-frequency shift on the correlation length, first falling and then rising as polarization scrambling intensifies. The practical point is that random birefringence in ordinary fibers need not block multimode soliton formation or beam self-cleaning, which matters for multimode-fiber lasers and high-energy pulse transmission.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the vector generalized multimode nonlinear Schrödinger equation (GMMNLSE), in which each LP spatial mode is split into $x$- and $y$-polarized Jones-vector components, doubling $N$ modes to $2N$ polarized components. Random birefringence is inserted by dividing the fiber into short sections with fixed birefringence axes and applying a projection matrix $P$ at each interface to rotate the state of polarization by a random angle. The correlation length $L_C$ sets how fast these rotations decorrelate, while the beat length $L_B$ sets the birefringence strength inside a section; the nonlinear coupling coefficients $S^K$ and $S^R$ carry the mode-overlap dependence of the Kerr and Raman terms. This machinery converts random birefringence into two tunable parameters whose effects on soliton frequency shift and beam cleaning can be mapped quantitatively.

What would settle it

Measure the output center wavelength of a 50 fs, 1550 nm pulse after 15 m of graded-index multimode fiber while varying the correlation length of birefringence, for example by controlled twisting or bending: the paper predicts the Raman-induced shift is smallest at an intermediate $L_C$ and returns toward the no-birefringence value for small $L_C$. A monotonic decrease of the shift with decreasing $L_C$, or a collapse of beam self-cleaning at 70 nJ input energy, would contradict the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that random birefringence in multimode fibers acts as a general suppressor of Kerr nonlinearity while leaving the signature spatiotemporal phenomena partially intact. In the multimode-soliton scenario, the pulse still binds its modes together: modal walk-off does not change significantly compared with the no-birefringence case, even for correlation lengths down to 16.6 m. The Raman-induced soliton self-frequency shift, however, is not monotonically suppressed: starting from no birefringence, the shift first decreases as $L_C$ drops to about 166 m, then increases as $L_C$ drops further, so that at $L_C = 16.6$ m it is nearly the same as with no birefringence. In the beam self-cleaning scenario, random birefringence degrades cleaning at 40 nJ input energy, but at 70 nJ the fundamental-mode energy fraction and output beam quality improve substantially, showing that high peak power overcomes the polarization disorder. These findings are presented as numerical results from a modified vector GMMNLSE with parameters of realistic graded-index fibers.

Load-bearing premise

The central premise is that a real multimode fiber can be represented by short straight sections with fixed birefringence axes and random polarization rotations only at the interfaces between sections, with no coupling between different mode groups; if that representation fails for a real fiber, the predicted dependence on correlation length and the resilience of beam self-cleaning may not appear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In a 15 m graded-index multimode fiber, a 50 fs, 1550 nm multimode pulse can still form a multimode soliton even when random birefringence is present; the output's modal walk-off is not significantly changed.
  • The Raman-induced soliton self-frequency shift is smallest for an intermediate correlation length, not for the strongest birefringence; as $L_C$ becomes very small the shift approaches the no-birefringence value.
  • Spatial beam self-cleaning, degraded by random birefringence at 40 nJ input energy, is restored at 70 nJ, so higher input peak power gives stronger resistance to polarization disorder.
  • Overall spectral broadening from the Kerr effect is reduced by random birefringence, because polarization components separate in time and SOP-dependent nonlinear coupling weakens.
  • The modified vector GMMNLSE can be reused to study input state of polarization, polarization mode dispersion, and nonlinear polarization dynamics in multimode fibers.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that the correlation length of a fiber is a control knob for the Raman soliton self-frequency shift in multimode systems; one could test this by straining or twisting fibers to vary $L_C$ and observing whether the shift dips and recovers.
  • Because the random-birefringence model is piecewise constant and neglects linear coupling between different mode groups, real fibers with smoothly varying birefringence may show a smoother or shifted $L_C$ curve; comparing against a continuously varying birefringence model would sharpen the prediction.
  • The high-power resilience of beam self-cleaning suggests that multimode-fiber lasers and high-energy ultrashort-pulse delivery systems may not require stringent polarization control at high energies, an implication the paper does not state.
  • The nonmonotonic $L_C$ dependence of the Raman shift may also affect supercontinuum generation and intermodal four-wave mixing in multimode fibers, where Raman and Kerr terms compete; these processes are not examined here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies nonlinear ultrashort pulse propagation in multimode fibers (MMFs) with random birefringence, using a vector generalized multimode nonlinear Schrödinger equation (GMMNLSE) in which the fiber is divided into sections with constant birefringence axes and random polarization rotations at the interfaces. The authors apply this model to three numerical examples: a basic spectral-broadening case, multimode soliton propagation with Raman-induced self-frequency shift, and Kerr spatial beam self-cleaning. The central claims are that random birefringence usually weakens nonlinearity but that the Raman-induced soliton self-frequency shift first decreases and then increases as the correlation length LC decreases, and that spatial beam self-cleaning can withstand random birefringence at high input peak powers. The model and simulation approach are inherited from earlier work, and the present contribution is the application to ultrashort-pulse regimes and the two specific nonlinear phenomena.

Significance. If the reported trends are robust, the paper addresses a timely and practically relevant question: whether random birefringence, unavoidable in real MMFs, prevents the formation of multimode solitons and spatial beam self-cleaning. The non-monotonic dependence of the Raman-induced self-frequency shift on LC would be an interesting and nontrivial result, and the resilience of beam self-cleaning at high power would offer practical guidance. The work is based on an established propagation equation and uses realistic fiber parameters computed from the fiber specification. However, the paper does not provide machine-checked proofs or public code, and the central quantitative claims rest entirely on stochastic simulations for which no ensemble averaging, error bars, or realization counts are reported. As presented, the evidence for the headline non-monotonic behavior and for the self-cleaning resilience is statistically incomplete.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section IV-B, Fig. 5]
  2. [Appendix B, Eqs. (A3)-(A4)]
  3. [Section IV-C, Fig. 6]
  4. [Appendix B, mode-coupling matrix]
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section IV-B, paragraph after Fig. 4]
  2. [Section I, Introduction]
  3. [Table I]
  4. [Appendix A, text after Eq. (A2)]
  5. [Section III]
  6. [Section IV-B, explanation of non-monotonicity]

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the random-birefringence model is taken from external references, and the central LC-dependence and beam-self-cleaning claims are direct numerical outputs rather than fitted or self-defined quantities.

full rationale

The paper's new quantitative claims—weakened Kerr nonlinearity, the non-monotonic LC dependence of the Raman-induced soliton self-frequency shift in Fig. 5, and high-power beam self-cleaning resilience in Fig. 6—are recorded outputs of a vector GMMNLSE simulation. The governing equation (Eq. 1), the nonlinear coupling coefficients (Eqs. A1-A2), and the interface projection matrix (Eq. A3) are adopted from external works [21], [24], [31], not constructed from the target results. The correlation length LC is defined independently through Eq. A4 and varied as an input; the wavelength shift and LP01 fraction are not fitted parameters, so no prediction collapses into an input by construction. The explanation of the non-monotonic Raman shift is post hoc, but a post-hoc narrative around a numerical output is not circular. The authors' own conference papers [25], [26] are cited only to state that this work extends them and to recall a low-energy beam-degradation result; they do not carry the paper's central claims, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from those citations to force the conclusions. The lack of ensemble averaging and incomplete statistical specification in Appendix B are reproducibility and statistical-robustness concerns, not circularity, because they do not make any equation equal to its input. No circular step is therefore identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The simulations rely on established equations, a borrowed random birefringence model, and hand-chosen parameters (LB, LC, Δn). The central claims are therefore contingent on the validity of these modeling choices.

free parameters (4)
  • Beat length LB = order of 10 m
    Sets the birefringence strength within each section; chosen as typical for common fibers, affects the magnitude of polarization walk-off.
  • Correlation length LC = 16.6 m, 166 m (Example 2); 10 m (Example 3)
    Key control parameter for random SOP rotation; the non-monotonic Raman shift is plotted as a function of LC.
  • Refractive index difference Δn = 1.5e-7 (Example 3)
    Typical value for standard optical fibers; determines birefringence magnitude in the beam self-cleaning simulation.
  • Raman fraction fR = 0.18
    Standard value for fused silica; determines the strength of the Raman effect, which drives the soliton self-frequency shift.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Generalized multimode nonlinear Schrödinger equation (Poletti-Horak) and its massively parallel numerical solver (Wright et al.) are valid for ultrashort pulse propagation in MMFs.
    Adopted from Refs. [20], [21].
  • domain assumption Weak guidance holds, so modes can be represented as LP modes with Jones vectors doubling the mode number.
    Used in Section II to derive the vector GMMNLSE.
  • domain assumption Random birefringence can be modeled as discrete sections with constant birefringence axes and random SOP rotations only at interfaces, with linear coupling between different mode groups neglected.
    Taken from Ref. [24] and described in Section II and Appendix B; if inaccurate, the LC-dependence results could change.
  • domain assumption The truncated set of modes (4, 8, or 10) is sufficient to capture the simulated dynamics.
    Higher-order modes and inter-group coupling are omitted (Section III and IV).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Effects of Random Birefringence in Multimode Fibers on Nonlinear Ultrashort Pulse Propagation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3ILL7VKZ

@misc{pith2026250509557,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Effects of Random Birefringence in Multimode Fibers on Nonlinear Ultrashort Pulse Propagation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3ILL7VKZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.09557}
}
read the original abstract

Nonlinear pulse propagation in multimode fibers (MMFs) has attracted significant attention recently due to the rich spatiotemporal nonlinearities and promising applications. In practical scenarios, random birefringence in MMFs cannot be neglected, affecting the polarization-dependent nonlinear pulse propagation. This paper investigates the influence of random birefringence in MMFs on nonlinear ultrashort pulse propagation using a modified generalized multimode nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation. Two scenarios, spatial beam self-cleaning and multimode soliton propagation, are specifically examined. It is found that while random birefringence typically weakens nonlinearity in MMFs, certain nonlinear processes such as soliton self-frequency shift caused by intra-pulse Raman effect exhibit a complex relationship with random birefringence. Moreover, the study reveals that beam self-cleaning can endure random birefringence at high input peak powers. This research provides guidance for practical applications that utilize the nonlinear transmission of ultrashort pulses in MMFs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.09557 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the model. For pulse propagation within each fiber section, a vector form of GMMNLSE is utilized. The GMMNLSE has been employed previously to describe nonlinear pulse dynamics in passive MMFs, incorporating high-order dispersion and nonlinear effects such as Raman and self-steepening [21]. Under the assumption of weak guidance, spatial modes in MMFs are often represented in terms of linearly pol… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Refractive index profile of the graded-index MMF, where n0 and n1 represent the refractive index of the core center and cladding, respectively. IV. EFFECTS OF RANDOM BIREFRINGENCE Based on the model and simulation settings presented in sections II and III, respectively, we numerically investigate the effects of random birefringence in MMFs on nonlinearities through those three examples of Table I. A. Example 1: A Si… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Mode-resolved (a,b) input and (c-f) output pulses of the MMF. (c,d) without and (e,f) with random birefringence. (a,c,e) Temporal and (b,d,f) spectral domains. All four modes are overlapped in (a), and the 2nd and 3rd modes are overlapped in (c). Legends represent the number of modes. For better distinction of each mode in the spectral domain, the curve of the 2 nd mode has been shifted upwards by 1 unit, and so for… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Raman-induced wavelength shift varies with LC. Figs. 4(e,f) illustrate the outputs from the MMF with relatively weak random birefringence (LC =166 m). As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Comparison of beam self-cleaning (representing by the proportion of LP01 in the output beam) with and without random birefringence under different input peak power and different LC. For each curve, different input pulse energies were investigated, with other parameters…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    G. P. Agrawal, nonlinear fiber optics, 6th ed., Academic Press, chapter 6

    work page

  2. [2]

    Stability of solitons in randomly varying birefringent fibers,

    P. K. A. Wai, C. R. Menyuk, and H. H. Chen, “Stability of solitons in randomly varying birefringent fibers,” Opt. Lett., vol. 16, no. 16, p. 1231, Aug. 1991

    work page 1991

  3. [3]

    Polarization multiplexing with solitons,

    S. G. Evangelides, L. F. Mollenauer, J. P. Gordon, and N. S. Bergano, “Polarization multiplexing with solitons,” J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 28–35, Jan. 1992

    work page 1992

  4. [4]

    Interaction of polarization mode dispersion and nonlinearity in optical fiber transmission systems,

    C. R. Menyuk and B. S. Marks, “Interaction of polarization mode dispersion and nonlinearity in optical fiber transmission systems,” J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 2806–2826, Jul. 2006

    work page 2006

  5. [5]

    Application of the Manakov-PMD equation to studies of signal propagation in optical fibers with randomly varying birefringence,

    D. Marcuse, C. R. Manyuk, and P. K. A. Wai, “Application of the Manakov-PMD equation to studies of signal propagation in optical fibers with randomly varying birefringence,” J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1735–1746, Sep. 1997

    work page 1997

  6. [6]

    Effects of Nonlinearities on PMD-Induced System Impairments,

    M. Karlsson and H. Sunnerud, “Effects of Nonlinearities on PMD-Induced System Impairments,” J. Lightwave Technol. , vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 4127 – 4137, Nov. 2006

    work page 2006

  7. [7]

    Space -division multiplexing in optical fibres,

    D. J. Richardson, J. M. Fini, and L. E. Nelson, “Space -division multiplexing in optical fibres,” Nature Photon, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 354–362, May 2013

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Self -organized instability in graded -index multimode fibres,

    L. G. Wright, Z. Liu, D. A. Nolan, M.-J. Li, D. N. Christodoulides, and F. W. Wise, “Self -organized instability in graded -index multimode fibres,” Nature Photon, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 771–776, Dec. 2016

    work page 2016

Show all 31 references
  1. [9]

    Observation of Geometric Parametric Instability Induced by the Periodic Spatial Self -Imaging of Multimode Waves,

    K. Krupa et al., “Observation of Geometric Parametric Instability Induced by the Periodic Spatial Self -Imaging of Multimode Waves,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 116, no. 18, p. 183901, May 2016

    2016

  2. [10]

    Spatiotemporal Instability of Femtosecond Pulses in Graded-Index Multimode Fibers,

    U. Tegin and B. Ortac, “Spatiotemporal Instability of Femtosecond Pulses in Graded-Index Multimode Fibers,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., vol. 29, no. 24, pp. 2195–2198, Dec. 2017. 5

    2017

  3. [11]

    Spatial beam self-cleaning in multimode fibres,

    K. Krupa et al., “Spatial beam self-cleaning in multimode fibres,” Nature Photon, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 237–241, Apr. 2017

    2017

  4. [12]

    Kerr self-cleaning of femtosecond-pulsed beams in graded -index multimode fiber,

    Z. Liu, L. Wright, D. Christodoulides, and F. Wise, "Kerr self-cleaning of femtosecond-pulsed beams in graded -index multimode fiber," Opt. Lett. vol. 41, pp. 3675-3678, 2016

    2016

  5. [13]

    Controllable spatiotemporal nonlinear effects in multimode fibres,

    L. G. Wright, D. N. Christodoulides, and F. W. Wise, “Controllable spatiotemporal nonlinear effects in multimode fibres,” Nature Photon, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 306–310, May 2015

    2015

  6. [14]

    Ultrabroadband Dispersive Radiation by Spatiotemporal Oscillation of Multimode Waves,

    L. G. Wright, S. Wabnitz, D. N. Christodoulides, and F. W. Wise, “Ultrabroadband Dispersive Radiation by Spatiotemporal Oscillation of Multimode Waves,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 115, no. 22, p. 223902, Nov. 2015

    2015

  7. [15]

    Spatiotemporal mode-locking in multimode fiber lasers,

    L. G. Wright, D. N. Chri stodoulides, and F. W. Wise, “Spatiotemporal mode-locking in multimode fiber lasers,” Science, vol. 358, no. 6359, pp. 94–97, Oct. 2017

    2017

  8. [16]

    Observation of soliton molecules in a spatiotemporal mode-locked multimode fiber laser,

    H. Qin, X. Xiao, P. Wang, and C. Yang, “Observation of soliton molecules in a spatiotemporal mode-locked multimode fiber laser,” Opt. Lett., vol. 43, no. 9, p. 1982, May 2018

    1982

  9. [17]

    Spatiotemporal Mode-Locking in Lasers with Large Modal Dispersion,

    Y. Ding, X. Xiao, K. Liu, S. Fan, X. Zhang, and C. Yang, “Spatiotemporal Mode-Locking in Lasers with Large Modal Dispersion,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 126, no. 9, p. 093901, Mar. 2021

    2021

  10. [18]

    Single-mode output by controlling the spatiotemporal nonlinearities in mode -locked femtosecond multimode fiber lasers,

    U. Teğin, B. Rahmani, E. Kakkava, D. Psaltis, and C. Moser, “Single-mode output by controlling the spatiotemporal nonlinearities in mode -locked femtosecond multimode fiber lasers,” Ad v. Pho ton., vol. 2, no. 05, p. 056005, Oct. 2020

    2020

  11. [19]

    Investigation of High -Power Spatiotemporal Mode-Locking with High Beam Quality,

    H. Zhang, J . Lu, J . Peng, et. al., “Investigation of High -Power Spatiotemporal Mode-Locking with High Beam Quality,” Laser Photonics Rev., vol. 17, p. 2300017, 2023

    2023

  12. [20]

    Description of ultrashort pulse propagation in multimode optical fibers,

    F. Poletti and P. Horak, “Description of ultrashort pulse propagation in multimode optical fibers,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, vol. 25, no. 10, p. 1645, Oct. 2008

    2008

  13. [21]

    Multimode Nonlinear Fiber Optics: Massively Parallel Numerical Solver, Tutorial, and Outlook,

    L. G. Wright et al., “Multimode Nonlinear Fiber Optics: Massively Parallel Numerical Solver, Tutorial, and Outlook,” IEEE J. Select. Topics Quantum Electron., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1–16, May 2018

    2018

  14. [22]

    Nonlinear Propagation in Multimode and Multicore Fibers: Generalization of the Man akov Equations,

    S. Mumtaz, R.-J. Essiambre, and G. P. Agrawal, “Nonlinear Propagation in Multimode and Multicore Fibers: Generalization of the Man akov Equations,” J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 398–406, Feb. 2013

    2013

  15. [23]

    Nonlinear propagation in multi- mode fibers in the strong coupling regime,

    A. Mecozzi, C. Antonelli, and M. Shtaif, “Nonlinear propagation in multi- mode fibers in the strong coupling regime,” Opt. Express, vol. 20, no. 11, p. 11673, May 2012

    2012

  16. [24]

    Intermodal Four -Wave Mixing and Parametric Amplification in Kilometer-Long Multimode Fibers,

    M. Guaso ni, F. Parmigiani, P. Horak, J. Fatome and D. J. Richardson, "Intermodal Four -Wave Mixing and Parametric Amplification in Kilometer-Long Multimode Fibers," Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 35, no. 24, pp. 5296-5305, Dec. 2017

    2017

  17. [25]

    Effects of Polarization on the Nonlinear Pulse Propagation in Multimode Fibers,

    H. Liu, S. Fan and X. Xiao, "Effects of Polarization on the Nonlinear Pulse Propagation in Multimode Fibers," 2021 19th International Conference on Optical Communications and Networks (ICOCN), Qufu, China, 2021, pp. 1-3

    2021

  18. [26]

    Effects of Random Birefringence in Multimode Fibers on Nonlinear Beam Self -cleaning,

    C. Geng and X. Xiao, “Effects of Random Birefringence in Multimode Fibers on Nonlinear Beam Self -cleaning,” 2024 22nd International Conference on Optical Communications and Networks (ICOCN), Haerbin, China, 2024, pp. 1-3

    2024

  19. [27]

    Weakly Guidin g Fibers,

    D. Gloge, “Weakly Guidin g Fibers,” Appl. Opt., vol. 10, no. 10, p. 2252, Oct. 1971

    1971

  20. [28]

    Wave condensation with weak disorder versus beam self- cleaning in multimode fibers,

    J. Garnier et al., “Wave condensation with weak disorder versus beam self- cleaning in multimode fibers,” Phys. Rev. A , vol. 100, no. 5, p. 053835, Nov. 2019

    2019

  21. [29]

    Nonlinear polarization d ynamics of Kerr beam self - cleaning in a graded-index multimode optical fiber,

    K. Krupa et al. , “Nonlinear polarization d ynamics of Kerr beam self - cleaning in a graded-index multimode optical fiber,” Opt. Lett., vol. 44, no. 1, p. 171, Jan. 2019

    2019

  22. [30]

    Spatial Beam Cleaning in Multimode GRIN Fibers: Polarization Effects,

    M. Ferraro et al., "Spatial Beam Cleaning in Multimode GRIN Fibers: Polarization Effects," in IEEE Photonics Journal, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 1 -6, Oct. 2023

    2023

  23. [31]

    Multimode Nonlinear Fibre Optic s: Theory and Applications,

    P. Horak and F. Poletti, “Multimode Nonlinear Fibre Optic s: Theory and Applications,” in Recent Progress in Optical Fiber Research, Moh. Yasin, Ed. InTech, 2012

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.