Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 major objections 5 minor 45 references

Twist Bilayer Photonic slab's Angle-DependentGuided Resonance Analysis based on Multiple Scattering

T0 review · 6 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A modified RCWA that replaces evanescent bases with flux-carrying superpositions computes the eigenmodes of twisted bilayer photonic slabs and identifies f_c = 0.7c/a as the boundary of the angle-dependent regime.

desk verdict A useful five-layer design heuristic sits atop an unbenchmarked, not-flux-normalized eigenmode method that the paper presents as its headline result. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.09908 v1 pith:XBORBZEZ submitted 2025-05-15 physics.optics

Wenzhu Xie , Yan Wang , Jingxuan Chen , JiaHao Si , Wei Rao , MingJin Wang , WanHua Zheng This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords twistedbilayerphotoniccrystalmodifiedrigorouscoupled-waveanalysisguidedresonancemultiplescatteringcoupled-modetheorymoiréstructuresFabry-Pérot
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the optical response of a twisted bilayer photonic crystal slab can be computed with a modified rigorous coupled-wave analysis (RCWA) in which the evanescent waves that shuttle between the two slabs are replaced by paired superpositions that carry real energy flux. With that replacement, the infinite multiple-scattering series between the slabs converges and the eigenmodes of the whole bilayer become accessible as eigenvectors of a product of single-slab scattering matrices, something the authors say standard RCWA could not provide. If the claim is right, the same modified solver explains two things at once: it predicts the angle-dependent guided resonances of moiré photonic slabs, and it locates the critical frequency, $f_c = 0.7c/a$, below which transmission is only Fabry-Pérot-like. It also supports a five-layer uniform-slab approximation, accurate to about $0.04a/c$, that gives optical engineers a quick design rule for twisted-bilayer devices such as beam-steering modules, tunable filters, and lasers.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the modified free-space eigenbasis used only in the air gap between the two slabs. In standard RCWA the gap modes are evanescent waves whose time-averaged Poynting vector along z is zero, which makes repeated reflections between the slabs unphysical and divergent. Each new mode is instead a normalized superposition of counter-propagating evanescent TE or TM waves, with factors $a^{\pm 1/2}$ and $a=e^{|k_z|h}$, chosen so the composite carries non-zero energy flux along z and respects time-reversal symmetry; traveling modes are left unchanged, and the far-field regions keep the original eigenmodes. This modified basis does two jobs: it makes the scattering-matrix series converge, and it expands the channel space used by the coupled-mode theory; the expanded channels are what place the lower boundary of the angle-dependent regime at $f_c=0.7c/a$.

What would settle it

Run an independent full-wave simulation of the same twisted-bilayer geometry, extract the transmission spectra from $0.5c/a$ to $1.0c/a$ for twist angles from 0 to 45 degrees, and compare: the paper's claim fails if angle-dependent resonances persist below $0.7c/a$, if the eigenmode frequencies differ from the five-layer prediction by much more than $0.04a/c$, or if no eigenvalue of $S^{(2)}_{21}S^{(1)}_{21}$ near unity can be associated with the observed resonance peaks. The experimental counterpart is to measure the fabricated PEEK slabs in the 75-110 GHz band and check the same boundary frequency.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the transmission of a twisted bilayer photonic slab is governed by the multiple-scattering series $\boldsymbol{u}^{(3)} = \sum_{i=0}^{\infty} S^{(1)}_{11} (S^{(2)}_{21} S^{(3)}_{21})^i S^{(2)}_{21} \boldsymbol{u}^{(1)}$, and that the stationary fields localized between the slabs are the eigenfields of the product matrix $S^{(2)}_{21} S^{(1)}_{21}$; an eigenvalue near one marks a guided resonance. Standard RCWA cannot supply these matrices because its evanescent modes have zero Poynting flux along the decay direction, so a reflected evanescent wave does not attenuate and the scattering series diverges. The paper's modification replaces the evanescent basis in the air gap by superpositions of counter-propagating evanescent waves with amplitude factors $a^{\pm 1/2}$ and $a=e^{|k_z|h}$, giving each basis mode a non-zero z-component of energy flux while preserving time-reversal symmetry. With this basis the authors compute bilayer eigenmodes, reproduce the transmission spectra, explain the splitting of the degenerate E resonance by the moiré potential, and identify the lowest single-slab resonance's lower boundary, $f_c=0.7c/a$, as the transition between angle-dependent resonance and Fabry-Pérot regimes.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the modified evanescent basis inside the air gap, pairs of counter-propagating evanescent waves combined to carry real energy flux with $a=e^{|k_z|h}$, completely and correctly describes the multiple-reflection physics, so that the scattering-matrix series and the eigenmodes it yields are the physical ones, a claim supported by an energy-conservation argument but not by an independent convergence proof or benchmark.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Resonance lines of a twisted bilayer slab can be computed directly from the eigenvalues of $S^{(2)}_{21} S^{(1)}_{21}$, bypassing the need for large supercell simulations of the moiré pattern.
  • The five-layer uniform-slab dispersion curves $\omega_i(\mathbf{k}_{\mathrm{inc}}+G^{(1)}_{m_1,n_1}+G^{(2)}_{m_2,n_2})$ predict the twist-angle-dependent resonances to about $0.04a/c$, giving engineers a closed-form design guide for choosing twist angle and lattice parameters.
  • Below $f_c=0.7c/a$ the bilayer behaves as a passive Fabry-Pérot cavity with no angle-dependent guided resonance, which sets a lower frequency bound for moiré-based beam steering and tunable filtering.
  • The moiré-induced splitting of the doubly degenerate E modes, around $0.005c/a$ for the parameters studied, provides a knob for engineering $\Gamma$-point band structure in photonic-crystal surface-emitting lasers.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the construction of the modified basis is general, the same product-of-scattering-matrices eigenmode idea should carry over to twisted multilayers and to slabs with different lattice symmetries, although the paper does not demonstrate those cases.
  • The critical frequency $f_c$ should depend on the hole radius, slab thickness, and dielectric contrast, since those parameters control the lowest even E-mode's channel opening; tracking that dependence would be a sharper test of the coupled-mode explanation than the single value reported.
  • The choice of the length scale $h$ entering $a=e^{|k_z|h}$ is not uniquely fixed by the physics; if the computed eigenmodes remain stable as $h$ is varied, the method is robust, and if not, that sensitivity would reveal where the modified-basis approximation breaks down.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

6 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript proposes a modified rigorous coupled-wave analysis in which the evanescent basis functions in the air gap are replaced by hybrid modes carrying non-zero Poynting flux, claiming that this enables, for the first time, eigenmode computation for twisted bilayer photonic-crystal slabs. The authors also propose a five-layer uniform-slab approximation to predict twist-angle-dependent and twist-angle-independent guided resonances, use D4 group theory to explain resonance splitting, and develop a coupled-mode theory with expanded channels to identify f_c=0.7c/a as the boundary between angle-dependent and Fabry-Perot transmission regimes. Experimental transmission spectra from 75 GHz to 110 GHz are presented.

Significance. If substantiated, the eigenmode calculation would be a genuinely useful tool for incommensurate twisted bilayer photonics, and the five-layer approximation could serve as a convenient design rule. The group-theory classification of the split modes is standard but clearly presented, and the five-layer model is a plausible simplification. However, the paper's central claims are not currently supported: the modified basis is not normalized or benchmarked, the key eigenvalue figure is missing, and the CMT explanation fits its parameters to the same data it is meant to explain. These issues affect the main novelty claims, not merely the presentation. No code or data repository is provided to allow independent verification.

major comments (6)
  1. [Supplemental Sec. 2; Table S1] The modified evanescent basis in Table S1 is not flux-normalized, and no common normalization that would make the scattering matrices unitary is given. For example, the S1 TE+ mode contains a factor a=e^{|kz|h} multiplying E+ while the S2 TE+ mode contains 1/a multiplying E+, so the z-flux of these two representations scales differently with h. Without a well-defined normalization, energy conservation does not imply unitarity of S^(i), and the criterion |lambda|≈1 for identifying resonances is not a well-defined condition. The central eigenmode claim therefore rests on an unproven premise.
  2. [Supplemental Sec. 1] The divergence argument used to justify the new basis is incomplete. The reflection coefficient at a single interface has |r|=1 for a purely evanescent wave, but the round-trip amplitude in the air gap includes the propagation factor e^{-|kz|d}, where d is the finite gap thickness. For d>0 this factor makes the multiple-scattering series converge in the standard evanescent basis, so the stated divergence does not establish the necessity of the modified basis. The manuscript does not provide a truncation-convergence study or an independent benchmark (e.g., RCWA4D or FDTD) for the computed eigenmodes.
  3. [Sec. 3.2] The eigenmode analysis that is claimed as the central result is not actually shown. The text states that 'The eigenvalue in Fig.S3(a) demonstrates a similar angle dependence as the transmission spectra,' but the supplementary material contains no such figure; Fig.S3 in the supplemental is the scattering-matrix synthesis diagram. Without a plot of the eigenvalues versus angle or frequency, and without a comparison to an independent solver, the claim that eigenmodes have been calculated for the first time is unsupported.
  4. [Sec. 3.3; Eqs. (6)-(7)] The coupled-mode theory explanation of the critical frequency f_c=0.7c/a is circular. The decay rates tau0 and tau1 are fitted to the same RCWA transmission data that are used to locate the resonance and its lower boundary; Eq. (6) and Eq. (7) are then used to identify f_c with the half-maximum of the fitted resonance. This reduces the 'transition mechanism' to the fitted lineshape rather than providing a predictive derivation. To support the claim, tau0 and tau1 should be computed from the mode profile or an independent first-principles method, not fitted to the target data.
  5. [Eq. (2)] There is an inconsistency in the definition of the round-trip operator. Equation (2) expands the transmission in powers of S^(2)_21 S^(3)_21, but the following sentence states that the eigenfunction of the matrix S^(2)_21 S^(1)_21 dictates the stationary field. Since S^(1) and S^(3) are described in the text as different physical processes (slab 1 in reflection vs. slab 1 in the multi-scattering region), the choice of operator affects the eigenvalue spectrum and the reproducibility of the headline result. This ambiguity should be resolved explicitly.
  6. [Sec. 3.1; Supplemental Sec. 5] The claimed accuracy 'around 0.04a/c' for the five-layer uniform-slab approximation is not accompanied by any data table or plot. Supplemental Sec. 5 states that three parameter sweeps were performed, but no numerical comparison between the approximation and the RCWA results is presented. A quantitative accuracy claim with no supporting data cannot be evaluated.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] The manuscript contains numerous grammatical and typographical errors, including 'To counter for the transmission property,' 'have never reveled the transition mechanism,' 'pave the wave,' and inconsistent capitalization. These should be corrected in a thorough language edit.
  2. [Fig. 3(c)] The text refers to 'the crossing exemplified by the intersection of the blue circle and the gray parallelogram in Fig.3(c),' but the figure has no legend identifying these markers, making the statement difficult to verify.
  3. [Eqs. (4)-(7)] The CMT equations use tau, tau0, and tau1 without stating the required relationship among them beyond the text near Eq. (5); the denominator in Eqs. (6)-(7) should be written with explicit parentheses, e.g., j(omega-omega0)+1/(2tau)+1/tau0+2/tau1, to avoid ambiguity.
  4. [References] Reference [45] is cited for the energy-conservation and time-reversal constraints of CMT, but the listed source, K. J. Dean, 'Waves and Fields in Optoelectronics,' appears to be misattributed; the standard citation for this text is H. A. Haus. This should be checked.
  5. [Supplemental Sec. 3] In the sentence 'Denoting L1 ... L1 ...', the second occurrence of L1 should be L2, and the symbols for the two reciprocal lattices are otherwise easy to confuse.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The CMT explanation of the critical frequency f_c=0.7c/a reduces to a fit: tau0 and tau1 are fitted to the same RCWA transmission data whose resonance edge is then identified as the transition frequency.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. 3.3, coupled-mode analysis, Eqs. (4)-(7) and Fig. 5]
    "In addition, we fit the ... to determine the values of τ0 and τ1 in order to examine the legitimacy of applying coupled-mode theory. ... The lower boundary of the resonance coincides with the critical frequency fc = 0.7c/a that demarcates the angle-dependent resonance and Fabry-Pérot resonance regimes."

    The CMT line shape in Eq. (6) is a Lorentzian whose center and width are fixed by ω0, τ0 and τ1. The paper then fits τ0 and τ1 to the very RCWA transmission spectra that exhibit the observed transition at fc, and subsequently identifies fc with the lower boundary of that fitted resonance. Because the fitting target and the explained phenomenon are the same computed spectra, the agreement between the fitted resonance edge and fc is guaranteed by the fitting procedure rather than being an independent prediction. The statement that the expanded-channel CMT 'determines' the transition frequency therefore reduces, by the paper's own equations and fitting step, to the values of τ0 and τ1 extracted from the data it is supposed to explain.

full rationale

The only circular step I can exhibit with the paper's own text is in Sec. 3.3: the CMT decay rates τ0 and τ1 are fit to the computed RCWA transmission data, and the same data's observed transition at fc=0.7c/a is then declared to coincide with the lower boundary of the fitted resonance. That is a fitted input being used as the predicted output. This is partial circularity because it affects one of the paper's headline claims, the CMT-based explanation of the two transmission regimes. The other main components are not circular under the given standards: the modified evanescent basis in Table S1 is constructed from stated physical requirements rather than from the target eigenmodes, the five-layer uniform-slab approximation is checked against RCWA resonance positions rather than being defined by them, and the group-theory splitting analysis is an independent symmetry argument. The internal inconsistency between S^(2)_21 S^(3)_21 in Eq. (2) and S^(2)_21 S^(1)_21 in Sec. 3.2, and the lack of an independent benchmark for the modified RCWA eigenmodes, are correctness and reproducibility concerns, not circularity. I therefore score 6 rather than higher: one central predictive claim reduces to a fit, while the eigenmode and five-layer derivations retain independent content.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claims rest on the validity of the modified evanescent basis, the synthesis approach for incommensurate lattices, the unperturbed five-layer model, D4 symmetry, and a four-channel CMT model. Two decay rates are fit to the computed transmission data. No code or independent benchmark is provided.

free parameters (2)
  • CMT decay rate tau0 = 38.82 a/c
    Fitted to the modified-RCWA transmission spectrum for s-±1 and s- in Sec. 3.3 and Fig. 5. Used in the coupled-mode lineshape that defines the resonance boundary and hence f_c.
  • CMT decay rate tau1 = 9.31 a/c
    Fitted in the same procedure as tau0. Controls the coupling to the expanded TE channels introduced by the modified eigenmodes.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Maxwell's equations and the Floquet-Fourier expansion used in standard RCWA are valid for the twisted bilayer system.
    Invoked throughout Supplemental Sec. 3 when constructing the scattering matrices from the eigenmodes of the periodic structure.
  • domain assumption An incommensurate twisted bilayer can be treated by synthesizing scattering matrices over the union reciprocal lattice L=L1+L2, sweeping kinc as in Lou et al.
    Stated in Sec. 2.1 and Supplemental Sec. 3. The synthesis method is inherited from prior work and is not re-derived here.
  • domain assumption Modes of the five-layer uniform slab are good unperturbed eigenmodes, with the perturbation H' small except near avoided crossings.
    Sec. 3.1 states that coupling becomes non-negligible only near intersections of the unperturbed dispersions. No quantitative convergence test is given.
  • domain assumption The twisted bilayer at an incommensurate angle has D4 symmetry, and the resonance split follows from two E irreducible representations.
    Sec. 3.1 and Supplemental Sec. 6 use D4 group theory to classify modes and explain the split. The symmetry assignment is asserted, not derived from the lattice geometry.
  • domain assumption A four-channel temporal coupled-mode theory with energy-conservation relations applies to the lowest even slab mode at the Gamma point.
    Sec. 3.3 assumes the mode decays into the surrounding air, the gap air, and two TE free-space channels, and that the coupling constants satisfy |k>=|D> and related identities.
invented entities (2)
  • Non-zero-flux hybrid evanescent modes defined in Table S1
    purpose: Replace zero-flux evanescent bases in the air gap so that the multiple-scattering series converges and eigenmodes can be computed.
    Constructed within the paper from superpositions of counter-propagating evanescent waves. No independent benchmark or closed-form validation is provided.
  • Expanded CMT channels with in-plane wave vectors +G^(1)_0,1 and -G^(1)_0,1 in the gap air
    purpose: Add extra resonance decay paths that broaden the resonance and set the transition frequency f_c=0.7c/a.
    These channels are mathematical constructs introduced by the modified eigenmode set. Their physical reality is not demonstrated experimentally or by an independent solver.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Twist Bilayer Photonic slab's Angle-DependentGuided Resonance Analysis based on Multiple Scattering." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XBORBZEZ

@misc{pith2026250509908,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Twist Bilayer Photonic slab's Angle-DependentGuided Resonance Analysis based on Multiple Scattering},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XBORBZEZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.09908}
}
read the original abstract

We present an analysis of the transmission spectra of the twisted bilayer photonic slabs using a modified rigorous coupled wave (RCWA) analysis, where the evanescent bases are replaced by bases with non-zero flux density. By utilizing the modified RCWA we demonstrate the calculation of eigenmodes, which has not been realized before. To counter for the transmission property, we propose a five-layer uniform slab approximation, with an accuracy around 0.04a/c, which is more straightforward and accessible for optical engineers compared to work by Lou et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 136101]. The moir\'e pattern perturbation induces a split of resonance, which show great potential for engineering the band structure. Moreover, We observe two distinct transmission phases: the angle-dependent phase and Fabry-P\'erot phase, which is explained by a coupled-mode theory (CMT) with expanded channels brought by the modified eigenmodes. Our work provides a theoretical framework for the design and optimization of twisted bilayer photonic devices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.09908 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Twisted bilayer photonic crystal slabs illuminated by normally incident light [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The physics that the three scattering matrices represent. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) The corresponding five-layer uniform slab is surrounded by air, with the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) (b)TE and TM component distribution of the eigenmode at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) The fitting result for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Y. Cao, J. Luo, V. Fatemi, et al., Superlattice- Induced Insulating States and Valley - Protected Orbits in Twisted Bilayer Graphene , Physical Review Letters 117, 116804 (2016)

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    Fang and E

    S. Fang and E. Kaxiras, Electronic structure theory of weakly interacting bilayers, Physical Review B 93, 235153 (2016)

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, A. Demir, et al., Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature 556, 80--84 (2018)

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    T. Han, Z. Lu, G. Scuri, et al., Correlated insulator and Chern insulators in pentalayer rhombohedral-stacked graphene, Nature Nanotechnology 19, 181--187 (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, et al., Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature 556, 43--50 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    H. S. Arora, R. Polski, Y. Zhang, et al., Superconductivity in metallic twisted bilayer graphene stabilized by WSe2 , Nature 583, 379--384 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Stepanov, I

    P. Stepanov, I. Das, X. Lu, et al., Untying the insulating and superconducting orders in magic-angle graphene, Nature 583, 375--378 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Y. Guo, J. Pack, J. Swann, et al., Superconductivity in 5.0° twisted bilayer WSe2 , Nature 637, 839--845 (2025)

    work page 2025

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    D. S. Kim, R. C. Dominguez, R. Mayorga-Luna, et al., Electrostatic moiré potential from twisted hexagonal boron nitride layers, Nature Materials 23, 65--70 (2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    Tanaka, J

    M. Tanaka, J. .-j. Wang, T. H. Dinh, et al., Superfluid stiffness of magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Nature 638, 99--105 (2025)

    2025

  3. [11]

    K. Dong, T. Zhang, J. Li, et al., Flat Bands in Magic - Angle Bilayer Photonic Crystals at Small Twists , Physical Review Letters 126, 223601 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    H. Tang, F. Du, S. Carr, et al., Modeling the optical properties of twisted bilayer photonic crystals, Light: Science & Applications 10, 157 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    H. Wang, S. Ma, S. Zhang, and D. Lei, Intrinsic superflat bands in general twisted bilayer systems, Light: Science & Applications 11, 159 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    C.-H. Yi, H. C. Park, and M. J. Park, Strong interlayer coupling and stable topological flat bands in twisted bilayer photonic Moiré superlattices, Light: Science & Applications 11, 289 (2022)

    2022

  7. [15]

    T. X. Hoang, D. Leykam, and Y. Kivshar, Photonic Flatband Resonances in Multiple Light Scattering , Physical Review Letters 132, 043803 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    D. X. Nguyen, X. Letartre, E. Drouard, et al., Magic configurations in moiré superlattice of bilayer photonic crystals: Almost -perfect flatbands and unconventional localization, Physical Review Research 4, L032031 (2022)

    2022

  9. [17]

    Huang, W

    L. Huang, W. Zhang, and X. Zhang, Moiré Quasibound States in the Continuum , Physical Review Letters 128, 253901 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    H. Qin, Z. Su, M. Liu, et al., Arbitrarily polarized bound states in the continuum with twisted photonic crystal slabs, Light: Science & Applications 12, 66 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    H. Qin, S. Chen, W. Zhang, et al., Optical moiré bound states in the continuum, Nature Communications 15, 9080 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    P. Wang, Y. Zheng, X. Chen, et al., Localization and delocalization of light in photonic moiré lattices, Nature 577, 42--46 (2020)

    2020

  13. [21]

    J. Zeng, Y. Hu, X. Zhang, et al., Localization-to-delocalization transition of light in frequency-tuned photonic moiré lattices, Optics Express 29, 25388 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    G. Xu, X. Zhou, W. Chen, et al., Hydrodynamic moiré superlattice, Science 386, 1377--1383 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    Mao, Z.-K

    X.-R. Mao, Z.-K. Shao, H.-Y. Luan, et al., Magic-angle lasers in nanostructured moiré superlattice, Nature Nanotechnology 16, 1099--1105 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    A. Raun, H. Tang, X. Ni, et al., GaN Magic Angle Laser in a Merged Moiré Photonic Crystal , ACS Photonics 10, 3001--3007 (2023)

    2023

  17. [25]

    Luan, Y.-H

    H.-Y. Luan, Y.-H. Ouyang, Z.-W. Zhao, et al., Reconfigurable moiré nanolaser arrays with phase synchronization, Nature 624, 282--288 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    B. Lou, H. Tang, F. Du, et al., Free- Space Beam Steering with Twisted Bilayer Photonic Crystal Slabs , ACS Photonics 11, 3636--3643 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    Lou and S

    B. Lou and S. Fan, Tunable Frequency Filter Based on Twisted Bilayer Photonic Crystal Slabs , ACS Photonics 9, 800--805 (2022)

    2022

  20. [28]

    Inoue, M

    T. Inoue, M. Yoshida, J. Gelleta, et al., General recipe to realize photonic-crystal surface-emitting lasers with 100- W -to-1- kW single-mode operation, Nature Communications 13, 3262 (2022)

    2022

  21. [29]

    Yoshida, S

    M. Yoshida, S. Katsuno, T. Inoue, et al., High-brightness scalable continuous-wave single-mode photonic-crystal laser, Nature 618, 727--732 (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    Sakata, K

    R. Sakata, K. Ishizaki, M. De Zoysa, et al., Dually modulated photonic crystals enabling high-power high-beam-quality two-dimensional beam scanning lasers, Nature Communications 11, 3487 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    M. Wang, F. Wang, J. Chen, et al., Active Beam Steering Enabled by Photonic - Crystal Surface - Emitting Laser , ACS Nano 18, 18880--18888 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    H. Tang, B. Lou, F. Du, et al., Experimental probe of twist angle–dependent band structure of on-chip optical bilayer photonic crystal, Science Advances 9, eadh8498 (2023)

    2023

  25. [33]

    B. Lou, N. Zhao, M. Minkov, et al., Theory for Twisted Bilayer Photonic Crystal Slabs , Physical Review Letters 126, 136101 (2021)

    2021

  26. [34]

    B. Lou, B. Wang, J. A. Rodríguez, et al., Tunable guided resonance in twisted bilayer photonic crystal, Science Advances 8, eadd4339 (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    Lou and S

    B. Lou and S. Fan, RCWA4D : Electromagnetic solver for layered structures with incommensurate periodicities, Computer Physics Communications 306, 109356 (2025)

    2025

  28. [36]

    Fan and J

    S. Fan and J. D. Joannopoulos, Analysis of guided resonances in photonic crystal slabs, Physical Review B 65, 235112 (2002)

    2002

  29. [37]

    Li, New formulation of the Fourier modal method for crossed surface-relief gratings, Journal of the Optical Society of America A 14, 2758 (1997)

    L. Li, New formulation of the Fourier modal method for crossed surface-relief gratings, Journal of the Optical Society of America A 14, 2758 (1997)

    1997

  30. [38]

    Manolatou, M

    C. Manolatou, M. Khan, S. Fan, et al., Coupling of modes analysis of resonant channel add-drop filters, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics 35, 1322--1331 (1999)

    1999

  31. [39]

    S. Fan, W. Suh, and J. D. Joannopoulos, Temporal coupled-mode theory for the Fano resonance in optical resonators, Journal of the Optical Society of America A 20, 569 (2003)

    2003

  32. [40]

    Born and E

    M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of optics: electromagnetic theory of propagation, interference and diffraction of light (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017), seventh (expanded) edition, 13th printing ed

    2017

  33. [41]

    R. C. Rumpf, IMPROVED FORMULATION OF SCATTERING MATRICES FOR SEMI - ANALYTICAL METHODS THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH CONVENTION , Progress In Electromagnetics Research B 35, 241--261 (2011)

    2011

  34. [42]

    J. D. Joannopoulos, S. G. Johnson, J. N. Winn, and R. D. Meade, Photonic crystals: molding the flow of light (Princeton University Press, Princeton Oxford, 2008), 2nd ed

    2008

  35. [43]

    J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern quantum mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2021), 3rd ed

    2021

  36. [44]

    Wonjoo Suh , Zheng Wang , and Shanhui Fan , Temporal coupled-mode theory and the presence of non-orthogonal modes in lossless multimode cavities, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics 40, 1511--1518 (2004)

    2004

  37. [45]

    K. J. Dean, Waves and Fields in Optoelectronics : Prentice - Hall Series in Solid State Physical Electronics , Physics Bulletin 35, 339--339 (1984)

    1984

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.