Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 44 references

Nanoscale Ultrafast Lattice Modulation with Hard X-ray Free Electron Laser

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read By crossing two coherent 9.8 keV hard X-ray pulses, this paper creates transient gratings with 11.8 and 9.2 nm periods in bulk SrTiO3, excites 0.67 and 1.34 THz acoustic phonons, and reports a reduced thermal diffusivity that it…

desk verdict A real first: hard X-ray transient gratings at 10 nm period; the ballistic transport conclusion, however, rests on a single fitted decay time that the data do not yet nail down. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.03428 v1 pith:DXZST3EZ submitted 2025-06-03 physics.optics

Haoyuan Li , Nan Wang , Leon Zhang , Sanghoon Song , Yanwen Sun , May-Ling Ng , Takahiro Sato , Dillon Hanlon
show 19 more authors
Sajal Dahal Mario D. Balcazar Vincent Esposito Selene She Chance Caleb Ornelas-Skarin Joan Vila-Comamala Christian David Nadia Berndt Peter Richard Miedaner Zhuquan Zhang Matthias Ihme Mariano Trigo Keith A. Nelson Jerome B. Hastings Alexei A. Maznev Laura Foglia Samuel Teitelbaum David A. Reis Diling Zhu
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords X-raytransientgratinghardfreeelectronlaserSrTiO3nanoscalethermaltransportballisticheatcoherentacousticphononsfour-wavemixingultrafastdiffraction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper shows that two hard X-ray pulses, synchronized to well under a femtosecond, can be crossed in a bulk crystal to create an X-ray transient grating with a period of about 10 nm, and that this grating imprints a matching lattice modulation and launches coherent acoustic phonons. Measurements on SrTiO3 with periods 11.8 nm and 9.2 nm reveal sharp satellite diffraction peaks at wavevector $\pm k_{\mathrm{TG}}$ that oscillate at 0.67 and 1.34 THz, the fundamental and second harmonic of longitudinal acoustic phonons at that wavevector. Fitting the intensity traces yields a sound velocity of 8.0 km/s, consistent with the bulk value, and a thermal relaxation time from which the authors extract an effective diffusivity of $0.015 \pm 0.002$ cm$^2$/s, about three times smaller than STO's bulk value. They argue that a diffusive model would require heat to cross 5.9 nm faster than the acoustic mode velocity allows, so the reduced diffusivity is evidence of ballistic heat transport at this length scale. If correct, this makes hard X-ray transient gratings a working tool for nanoscale coherent control and for transport measurements well below 10 nm.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the X-ray transient grating formed by the interference of two mutually coherent hard X-ray pump pulses crossing at angle $\theta$; because the photon wavelength is 0.127 nm, the period can be pushed to $\Lambda_{\mathrm{TG}} = \lambda_0/(2\sin(\theta/2)) = 11.8$ or 9.2 nm. A split-and-delay line and a diamond transmission grating produce the two pump pulses with sub-femtosecond arrival-time precision, so the standing-wave intensity profile $P(r) = V^{-1}(1 + \cos(r \cdot k_{\mathrm{TG}}))$ has high contrast. Each photo-absorption site launches a nanoscale strain field; at $q = \pm k_{\mathrm{TG}}$ the contributions from $N \approx 3.2 \times 10^4$ sites add coherently, producing the enhanced signal that Eq. (4) describes. The same displacement-field model, Eq. (1), supplies the thermal relaxation time $\tau_0$ and phonon lifetime $\tau_1$ that carry the transport interpretation.

What would settle it

Measure tau0 at several additional grating periods in the same STO crystal, spanning roughly 7 to 14 nm. If the thermal-grating interpretation is correct, D_eff = (tau0 $k_TG^{2}$)^{-1} should either stay constant (diffusive) or decrease with increasing k_TG (ballistic); if tau0 instead tracks the ~10 nm photoelectron mean-free-path contrast loss, the extracted D_eff will not show this k_TG scaling and the ballistic conclusion fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that nanoscale X-ray standing waves can drive periodic lattice motion in a bulk crystal despite the ~10 nm inelastic mean free path of the keV photoelectrons they produce. The authors demonstrate generation of an X-ray transient grating with spatial periods $\Lambda_{\mathrm{TG}} = 11.8$ nm and 9.2 nm in SrTiO3, and observe a sharp XTG diffraction peak atop diffuse scattering at $q \approx \pm k_{\mathrm{TG}}$. The time dependence follows $r(\pm k_{\mathrm{TG}},\tau)-1 \propto \beta^2 N(N-1)/4 \, (e^{-\tau/\tau_0} - e^{-\tau/\tau_1} \cos(k_{\mathrm{TG}} v \tau))^2$, giving $v = 8.0$ km/s, $\tau_0$ between 1.8 and 3.0 ps, and $\tau_1$ between 7.7 and 11.9 ps. The extracted effective thermal diffusivity $D_{\mathrm{eff}} = (\tau_0 k_{\mathrm{TG}}^2)^{-1} = 0.015 \pm 0.002$ cm$^2$/s is about three times smaller than the bulk diffusivity, and the authors present this as evidence of ballistic, rather than diffusive, heat transport over the 5.9 nm half-period.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the decay time tau0 extracted from the grating intensity is solely the thermal relaxation of the grating, so that D_eff = (tau0 $k_TG^{2}$)^{-1} is a true thermal diffusivity; if electron-cascade spreading, finite photoelectron mean free path, acoustic loss, or other dephasing contributes to tau0, the inferred diffusivity and ballistic claim are not unique.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Hard X-ray transient gratings can create periodic lattice strain at roughly 10 nm and potentially smaller periods in bulk crystals, moving XTG from hundreds of nanometers into the nanoscale regime.
  • The coherent enhancement at $q = \pm k_{\mathrm{TG}}$ makes high-wavevector acoustic phonons, including their second harmonic, visible and measurable in a time-resolved scattering signal.
  • The method provides a length-scale-resolved thermal diffusivity, offering a way to distinguish ballistic from diffusive heat transport in bulk materials at sub-10 nm scales.
  • Because the grating period is set by the crossing angle, the same setup can scan across wavevectors, opening a q-resolved window onto nanoscale lattice dynamics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that the ballistic interpretation predicts a specific scaling: D_eff should decrease as the grating period shrinks. Testing tau0 at several additional periods would confirm or refute that prediction, separating true transport physics from contrast-loss artifacts.
  • A fluence-dependence measurement could isolate the thermal-grating channel: if tau0 varies with pump fluence or sample thickness in ways that electron-cascade spreading would not, the extraction of D_eff would be put on firmer ground.
  • The same grating-writing scheme could be applied to materials with known nanostructure, such as alloys or thermoelectrics, where comparing wavevector-resolved diffusivity with bulk values might reveal boundary scattering; the paper does not attempt this.
  • Because the coherent signal scales as N^2, higher-repetition-rate or brighter X-ray sources could reach similar contrast at lower fluence, potentially making the technique less invasive for softer samples.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports the generation of an X-ray transient grating (XTG) with spatial periods of 11.8 nm and 9.2 nm in bulk SrTiO3, created by crossing two hard X-ray pump pulses at sub-femtosecond synchronization, and probed by a third hard X-ray pulse. The authors observe a sharp satellite diffraction peak consistent with a lattice modulation at the grating wavevector, and time-resolved intensity oscillations at 0.67 THz and 1.34 THz, which they identify as the fundamental and second harmonic of longitudinal acoustic phonons at the grating wavevector. From the time traces they extract a thermal relaxation time tau0, a phonon lifetime tau1, and a sound velocity, and they interpret the effective thermal diffusivity D_eff = (tau0 k_TG^2)^{-1} as evidence of ballistic thermal transport on the 5.9 nm half-period length scale.

Significance. If the transport interpretation is correct, the work represents a significant advance in nanoscale thermal transport measurements and in coherent control of lattice dynamics with hard X-rays. The experimental demonstration of a ~10 nm period XTG is well supported by the phase-matching condition, the angular dependence of the diffraction peaks, and the agreement of the fitted sound velocity (8.0 km/s) with the bulk value (7.8 km/s). The paper also provides a concrete new capability: generating and probing periodic lattice modulation with sub-10 nm period in a bulk crystal. However, the central transport claim is not yet established because it rests entirely on the identification of tau0 as a pure thermal-grating relaxation time, and the manuscript's own data contain inconsistencies that question this identification.

major comments (4)
  1. [Table 1 and Extended Data Table 3] The two independent determinations of tau0 from the +k_TG and -k_TG peaks, 1.8±0.4 ps and 3.0±1.0 ps respectively, are mutually inconsistent at about the 2-sigma level. If both peaks monitor the same thermal grating, the decay constant must be identical because thermal diffusivity is a scalar; the discrepancy therefore indicates that the fitted tau0 in Eq. (4) does not cleanly isolate the thermal relaxation, and the derived D_eff = (tau0 k_TG^2)^{-1} is not a robust measurement of thermal diffusivity. The authors should either reconcile the two values with a more general model or explicitly discuss why the two directions give different effective diffusivities.
  2. [Paragraph beginning 'Given the thermal relaxation time' and Extended Data Figure 6] The ballistic-transport claim rests on identifying tau0 with 1/(D k_TG^2). However, the manuscript attributes the large discrepancy between the theoretical coherent enhancement (~1800) and the observed factors of 11 and 17 (Extended Data Figure 6) to the electron mean free path smearing the grating contrast on a 10 nm scale. If the contrast is still evolving on the few-picosecond time scale of the fitted tau0, the exponential decay in Eq. (4) includes that contrast evolution, and tau0 is not a pure thermal-grating lifetime. The paper provides no control (e.g., pump-fluence dependence, two-pulse contrast variation, or an explicit model of time-dependent contrast) to separate these contributions. Without such a control, the comparison with bulk D is not conclusive.
  3. [Eq. (1) and Eq. (E-2)] Eq. (1) writes the thermal term as a single q-independent exponential e^{-t/tau0}, but a thermal grating decays by diffusion with a rate D q^2. The manuscript uses the same tau0 extracted at q=±k_TG in Eq. (E-2) for other q values, which is internally inconsistent unless tau0 is a local thermalization time rather than the grating relaxation time. If tau0 is instead a local quantity, it cannot be used directly to compute D_eff from the grating wavevector. The model needs to specify which physical process tau0 represents and justify its q-independence.
  4. [Figure 2(a) and 'Methods: Data Analysis'] The 9.2 nm configuration is reported only as a static diffraction spot; no time trace or fitted tau0 is presented for this period. Since the transport claim relies on a single grating period (11.8 nm), the expected Lambda^2 scaling of the thermal decay is untested. The authors should either present the 9.2 nm dynamics or explicitly restrict the transport interpretation to the 11.8 nm measurement.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (1)] Eq. (1) uses the variable t in the exponentials while the text defines the delay time as tau; this is inconsistent with Eq. (4) and the fitting functions.
  2. [Figure 1 caption] The caption contains a typo: 'scatterred' should be 'scattered'.
  3. [Eq. (3) and surrounding text] The derivation states the coherent enhancement factor is (N+3)/4, but Eq. (4) uses N(N-1)/4; the factor 3 in (N+3)/4 appears to be a small-N correction that becomes negligible for large N. The relationship between these expressions should be clarified.
  4. [Methods, Extended Data Figure 5 caption] 'The number in the legend shows the corresponding XTG wavelength Lambda_TG' is ambiguous because the legend also contains +/-k_TG labels; the figure would be clearer with explicit period values.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the nanoscale XTG and phonon claims are externally benchmarked; the D_eff inference is model-dependent but not circular.

full rationale

The central claims—generation of an XTG with 11.8 and 9.2 nm periods and excitation of coherent LA phonons—are established by the position of the diffraction peaks at q=±k_TG, consistent with the phase-matching condition k4=±(k1-k2)+k3+H, and by the measured oscillation frequencies 0.67 and 1.34 THz. The sound velocity fitted from Eq. (4), v=8.0±0.4 km/s, agrees with the independent macroscopic Brillouin value 7.8 km/s, so the phonon branch is not an internal construct. The thermal-diffusivity step is an extraction: Eq. (4) yields the decay parameter tau0, and D_eff=(tau0 k_TG^2)^-1 is the standard textbook conversion; the reduced value is then compared with an external bulk D and with the acoustic group velocity. This is a model-dependent inference rather than a circular prediction, because the fit does not include D_eff or the ballistic conclusion as inputs. The only apparent self-citation, ref. [28] for the split-and-delay optics, supports the instrumental coherence and is corroborated by the in-paper ray-tracing and mirror calibration as well as by the observation of the TG peaks themselves, so it is not load-bearing. The inconsistency of the two fitted tau0 values (1.8±0.4 ps and 3.0±1.0 ps) and the invoked electron-mean-free-path contrast loss are validity concerns for the thermal-grating identification, not circularity of the derivation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central measurement relies on a small number of domain assumptions inherited from prior X-ray diffuse scattering and transient grating theory. These are reasonable within the field but are not independently verified in this paper. The fitted parameters tau0, tau1, and v carry the physical interpretation, and the ballistic transport claim depends specifically on tau0 being a purely thermal relaxation time. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (6)
  • A (vertical offset in fits) = 0.88 +/- 0.05 (-kTG), 1.01 +/- 0.08 (+kTG)
    Nuisance offset in Eq. (E-1) and (E-2), fitted to time traces; not physically meaningful.
  • F (scaling factor) = 0.58 +/- 0.05 (-kTG), 0.55 +/- 0.03 (+kTG)
    Amplitude ratio between XTG modulation and scattering background, fitted in Eq. (E-1).
  • tau0 (thermal grating relaxation time) = 1.8 +/- 0.4 ps (-kTG), 3.0 +/- 1.0 ps (+kTG)
    Central fitted parameter used to compute D_eff and to infer ballistic transport.
  • tau1 (phonon lifetime) = 7.7 +/- 1.4 ps (-kTG), 11.9 +/- 3.6 ps (+kTG)
    Fitted phonon lifetime in Eq. (4); values differ between +kTG and -kTG beyond the stated uncertainties.
  • v (longitudinal sound velocity along kTG) = 8.0 +/- 0.4 km/s (-kTG), 8.0 +/- 0.7 km/s (+kTG)
    Fitted sound velocity, compared with the macroscopic value of 7.8 km/s; used only as a consistency check.
  • sigma (spatial extension of single-site strain) = 1.4 +/- 0.1 nm
    Fitted from diffuse scattering with Eq. (E-2); supports the single-site displacement model.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Each X-ray photon absorption event produces the displacement field of Eq. (1), a Gaussian localized strain plus an outgoing LA phonon wave packet.
    Adopted from prior X-ray diffuse scattering work (ref 26); not derived in this paper, but the central diffraction model depends on it.
  • domain assumption Photoabsorption sites are distributed according to the standing-wave profile P(r) = V^-1(1 + cos(r dot kTG)).
    This is the basis for the coherent enhancement factor in Eq. (3). It assumes the standing wave contrast is uniform and that each absorption event is independent.
  • standard math The measured intensity modulation factorizes as an ensemble-averaged structure factor times the single-site scattering amplitude, Eq. (2).
    Standard incoherent/coherent scattering factorization, but the paper does not discuss possible correlations between site positions and strain fields.
  • domain assumption The thermal grating relaxation time tau0 is related to thermal diffusivity by D_eff = (tau0 k_TG^2)^-1.
    Standard transient grating relation (ref 33), but its applicability requires that tau0 is purely thermal relaxation, which is the weakest point of the transport interpretation.
  • domain assumption The observed XTG peak angular width corresponds to a coherent grating length l of about 430 nm, giving N = 3.2e4 absorption sites per coherent volume.
    Uses diffraction theory for a finite grating and the known absorption site density; supports the enhancement estimate.
  • domain assumption The discrepancy between predicted and observed enhancement can be attributed to the 10 nm electron inelastic mean free path reducing contrast.
    Invoked without a quantitative model; it is a plausible mechanism but not demonstrated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nanoscale Ultrafast Lattice Modulation with Hard X-ray Free Electron Laser." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DXZST3EZ

@misc{pith2026250603428,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nanoscale Ultrafast Lattice Modulation with Hard X-ray Free Electron Laser},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DXZST3EZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.03428}
}
read the original abstract

Understanding and controlling microscopic dynamics across spatial and temporal scales has driven major progress in science and technology over the past several decades. While ultrafast laser-based techniques have enabled probing nanoscale dynamics at their intrinsic temporal scales down to femto- and attoseconds, the long wavelengths of optical lasers have prevented the interrogation and manipulation of such dynamics with nanoscale spatial specificity. With advances in hard X-ray free electron lasers (FELs), significant progress has been made developing X-ray transient grating (XTG) spectroscopy, aiming at the coherent control of elementary excitations with nanoscale X-ray standing waves. So far, XTGs have been probed only at optical wavelengths, thus intrinsically limiting the achievable periodicities to several hundreds of nm. By achieving sub-femtosecond synchronization of two hard X-ray pulses at a controlled crossing angle, we demonstrate the generation of an XTG with spatial periods of 10 nm. The XTG excitation drives a thermal grating that drives coherent monochromatic longitudinal acoustic phonons in the cubic perovskite, SrTiO3 (STO). With a third X-ray pulse with the same photon energy, time-and-momentum resolved measurement of the XTG-induced scattering intensity modulation provides evidence of ballistic thermal transport at nanometer scale in STO. These results highlight the great potential of XTG for studying high-wave-vector excitations and nanoscale transport in condensed matter, and establish XTG as a powerful platform for the coherent control and study of nanoscale dynamics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Emma, P.et al.First lasing and operation of an ˚Angstrom-wavelength free- electron laser.Nature Photonics4, 641–647 (2010)

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    First light from SACLA.Nature Photonics5, 456–457 (2011)

    Pile, D. First light from SACLA.Nature Photonics5, 456–457 (2011)

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    FEL’179–13 (2017)

    Weise, H., Decking, W.et al.Commissioning and first lasing of the European XFEL.Proc. FEL’179–13 (2017)

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    J.et al.SwissFEL: the Swiss x-ray free electron laser.Applied Sciences 7, 720 (2017)

    Milne, C. J.et al.SwissFEL: the Swiss x-ray free electron laser.Applied Sciences 7, 720 (2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    R.et al.Hard x-ray transient grating spectroscopy on bismuth germanate.Nature Photonics15, 499–503 (2021)

    Rouxel, J. R.et al.Hard x-ray transient grating spectroscopy on bismuth germanate.Nature Photonics15, 499–503 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    K.et al.Hard x-ray–optical four-wave mixing using a split-and-delay line.Optics Express31, 31410–31418 (2023)

    Peters, W. K.et al.Hard x-ray–optical four-wave mixing using a split-and-delay line.Optics Express31, 31410–31418 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    & Sampaio, J

    Simons, K. & Sampaio, J. L. Membrane organization and lipid rafts.Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology3, a004697 (2011)

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    S., Sze, S

    Meena, J. S., Sze, S. M., Chand, U. & Tseng, T.-Y. Overview of emerging nonvolatile memory technologies.Nanoscale Research Letters9, 1–33 (2014)

    work page 2014

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    Cui, Z.Nanofabrication(Springer, 2008)

    2008

  2. [10]

    L.et al.Atom-by-atom structural and chemical analysis by annular dark-field electron microscopy.Nature464, 571–574 (2010)

    Krivanek, O. L.et al.Atom-by-atom structural and chemical analysis by annular dark-field electron microscopy.Nature464, 571–574 (2010)

    2010

  3. [11]

    Kukura, P., McCamant, D. W. & Mathies, R. A. Femtosecond stimulated raman spectroscopy.Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.58, 461–488 (2007). 18

    2007

  4. [12]

    W.et al.Frequency-selective excitation of high-wavevector phonons.Applied Physics Letters113(2018)

    Teitelbaum, S. W.et al.Frequency-selective excitation of high-wavevector phonons.Applied Physics Letters113(2018)

    2018

  5. [13]

    Li, X.et al.Terahertz field–induced ferroelectricity in quantum paraelectric srtio3.Science364, 1079–1082 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    Kogar, A.et al.Light-induced charge density wave in LaTe3.Nature Physics 16, 159–163 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    Salikhov, R.et al.Coupling of terahertz light with nanometre-wavelength magnon modes via spin–orbit torque.Nature Physics19, 529–535 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    Bedzyk, M. J. & Cheng, L. X-ray standing wave studies of minerals and mineral surfaces: Principles and applications.Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry 49, 221–266 (2002)

    2002

  9. [17]

    & Masciovecchio, C

    Chergui, M., Beye, M., Mukamel, S., Svetina, C. & Masciovecchio, C. Progress and prospects in nonlinear extreme-ultraviolet and x-ray optics and spectroscopy. Nature Reviews Physics5, 578–596 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    Ambrosetti, A., Ferri, N., DiStasio Jr, R. A. & Tkatchenko, A. Wavelike charge density fluctuations and van der Waals interactions at the nanoscale.Science 351, 1171–1176 (2016)

    2016

  11. [19]

    R.et al.Excitation and detection of coherent nanoscale spin waves via extreme ultraviolet transient gratings.Science Advances10, eadp6015 (2024)

    Miedaner, P. R.et al.Excitation and detection of coherent nanoscale spin waves via extreme ultraviolet transient gratings.Science Advances10, eadp6015 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    Hayes, R., Warr, G. G. & Atkin, R. Structure and nanostructure in ionic liquids. Chemical reviews115, 6357–6426 (2015)

    2015

  13. [21]

    Bencivenga, F.et al.Nanoscale transient gratings excited and probed by extreme ultraviolet femtosecond pulses.Science Advances5, 5805 (2019). 19

    2019

  14. [22]

    Foglia, L.et al.Extreme ultraviolet transient gratings: A tool for nanoscale photoacoustics.Photoacoustics29, 100453 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    Bencivenga, F.et al.Four-wave mixing experiments with extreme ultraviolet transient gratings.Nature520, 205–208 (2015)

    2015

  16. [24]

    Physical Review Letters120, 263901 (2018)

    Foglia, L.et al.First evidence of purely extreme-ultraviolet four-wave mixing. Physical Review Letters120, 263901 (2018)

    2018

  17. [25]

    & Garcia-Molina, R

    de Vera, P. & Garcia-Molina, R. Electron inelastic mean free paths in condensed matter down to a few electronvolts.Journal of Physical Chemistry C123, 2075– 2083 (2019)

    2019

  18. [26]

    Huang, Y.et al.Nanometer-scale acoustic wave packets generated by stochastic core-level photoionization events.Physics Review X14, 041010 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    Chollet, M.et al.The x-ray pump–probe instrument at the linac coherent light source.Synchrotron Radiation22, 503–507 (2015)

    2015

  20. [28]

    Li, H.et al.Generation of highly mutually coherent hard-x-ray pulse pairs with an amplitude-splitting delay line.Physical Review Research3, 043050 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    & Mukamel, S

    Knoester, J. & Mukamel, S. Transient gratings, four-wave mixing and polariton effects in nonlinear optics.Physics Reports205, 1–58 (1991)

    1991

  22. [30]

    98 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2004)

    Shvyd’Ko, Y.X-ray optics: high-energy-resolution applicationsVol. 98 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2004)

    2004

  23. [31]

    & Inoue, K

    Ishidate, T., Sasaki, S. & Inoue, K. Brillouin scattering of srtio3 under high pressure.International Journal of High Pressure Research1, 53–65 (1988). 20

    1988

  24. [32]

    Shayduk, R.et al.Femtosecond x-ray diffraction study of multi-thz coherent phonons in srtio3.Applied physics letters120(2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    J., G¨ unter, P

    Eichler, H. J., G¨ unter, P. & Pohl, D. W.Laser-induced dynamic gratingsVol. 50 (Springer, 2013)

    2013

  26. [34]

    L., Continentino, M., Baggio-Saitovitch, E

    Martelli, V., Jim´ enez, J. L., Continentino, M., Baggio-Saitovitch, E. & Behnia, K. Thermal transport and phonon hydrodynamics in strontium titanate.Physical Review Letters120, 125901 (2018)

    2018

  27. [35]

    O., Fu, Y., Pardo, V

    Fumega, A. O., Fu, Y., Pardo, V. & Singh, D. J. Understanding the lattice thermal conductivity of srtio 3 from an ab initio perspective.Physical Review Materials4, 033606 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    Jia, C.-L.et al.Nanodomains and nanometer-scale disorder in multiferroic bismuth ferrite single crystals.Acta Materialia82, 356–368 (2015)

    2015

  29. [37]

    Kozina, M.et al.Terahertz-driven phonon upconversion in SrTiO3.Nature Physics15, 387–392 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    Decking, W.et al.A MHz-repetition-rate hard X-ray free-electron laser driven by a superconducting linear accelerator.Nature Photonics14, 391–397 (2020)

    2020

  31. [39]

    The LCLS-II-HE, a high energy upgrade of the LCLS-II (2018)

    Raubenheimer, T.et al. The LCLS-II-HE, a high energy upgrade of the LCLS-II (2018)

    2018

  32. [40]

    Nature Communications4, 2919 (2013)

    Hara, T.et al.Two-colour hard X-ray free-electron laser with wide tunability. Nature Communications4, 2919 (2013)

    2013

  33. [41]

    Lutman, A.et al.Experimental demonstration of femtosecond two-color x-ray free-electron lasers.Physical Review Letters110, 134801 (2013). 21

    2013

  34. [42]

    Zhu, D.et al.Performance of a beam-multiplexing diamond crystal monochro- mator at the linac coherent light source.Review of Scientific Instruments85, 6 (2014)

    2014

  35. [43]

    Acknowledgement Financial support from the U.S

    Mozzanica, A.et al.The JUNGFRAU detector for applications at synchrotron light sources and XFELs.Synchrotron Radiation News31, 16–20 (2018). Acknowledgement Financial support from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Gas-Phase Chemical Physics Progra...

    2018

  36. [44]

    The black dashed lines in (a) and (c) are guiding lines, indicating the temporal maximum for eachqwith the fitting result

    for (a) and (c) respectively. The black dashed lines in (a) and (c) are guiding lines, indicating the temporal maximum for eachqwith the fitting result. 27 Extended Data Figure 5|Angular dependence of efficiency: (a), (b) and (c) are angular dependence of the diffraction effic...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.