Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 143 references

AVID: Formation and evolution of a coalesced major merger of late-type dwarf galaxies (VCC 479) on the outskirts of the Virgo cluster

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that VCC 479 is a coalesced major merger of two late-type dwarf galaxies whose gas was largely stripped by the Virgo cluster before merger, leaving a small young core inside a quenched disk.

desk verdict A solid, internally consistent multi-wavelength case study of a dwarf merger remnant in Virgo, where the direct observations are strong but the environmental-stripping-before-coalescence timeline is a plausible scenario, not a demonstrated history. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.15268 v2 pith:JSFA26P7 submitted 2025-06-18 astro-ph.GA

Weibin Sun , Hong-Xin Zhang , Rory Smith , Elias Brinks , Patrick Côté , Se-Heon Oh , Zesen Lin , Alessandro Boselli
show 19 more authors
Laura Ferrarese Fujia Li Yuzhu Sun Lijun Chen Lanyue Zhang Minsu Kim Jaebeom Kim Tie Li Bojun Tao Matt Taylor Pierre-Alain Duc Ruben Sánchez-Janssén Yinghe Zhao Sanjaya Paudel Eric W. Peng Kaixiang Wang Stephen Gwyn Matteo Fossati Jean-Charles Cuillandre
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords dwarfgalaxymergersblue-coregalaxiesHIdeficiencyrampressurestrippingstellarshellsmorphologicaltransformationVirgoclustersimulations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

VCC 479 is a low-mass galaxy near the edge of the Virgo cluster that shows a set of features pointing to a single sequence of events: two roughly equal late-type dwarfs merged after the cluster had already removed most of their atomic gas. The paper identifies symmetric stellar shells as the fossil of that coalesced major merger, a central starburst that began about $600$ Myr ago and contributes only $2.9\pm0.5\%$ of the stellar mass, and an outer exponential disk whose star formation stopped about $900$ Myr ago. It reports that the remaining HI mass is just $1.4\times10^7\,M_\odot$ (deficiency of 1.09), concentrated in the central kiloparsec, with a velocity field misaligned from the stellar body. A simulated equal-mass merger that starts gas-poor ($f_{\rm gas}=0.1$) reproduces the shells, the central gas, and the small young fraction. If the interpretation is right, VCC 479 is a live example of how cluster environment and a dwarf-dwarf merger together turn a late-type dwarf into a blue-core early-type dwarf.

What carries the argument

The machinery that carries the argument has three parts. First, the symmetric stellar shells are the fossil signature of a coalesced major merger: the shell colors matching the body color are used to argue that the two progenitors had similar stellar populations and morphology. Second, a two-component structural decomposition splits the light into an outer exponential disk and a central Sersic light excess, and each component's spectral energy distribution is fitted separately, giving the disk quenching time of about $900$ Myr and the starburst onset of about $600$ Myr without the usual outshining degeneracy. Third, idealized equal-mass dwarf merger simulations are the interpretive engine: the fiducial run starts with a gas fraction of $0.1$ (gas mass roughly $10^7\,M_\odot$), and it reproduces the prominent shells, the centrally concentrated gas, and a young stellar fraction near $2\%$, while the gas-rich comparison ($f_{\rm gas}=1$) produces a much larger young population and weaker shells.

What would settle it

Find a shell-bearing dwarf merger remnant of stellar mass near $10^8\,M_\odot$ whose HI mass is still at the normal late-type level (well above $10^8\,M_\odot$): the simulations say gas-rich coalescence suppresses shells and creates far more young stars, so such an object would break the claimed link between pre-stripping, strong shells, and a weak central burst. Conversely, a systematic sample showing that all strong-shell remnants are HI-deficient would support the scenario.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's claim is that VCC 479 is the remnant of a major merger between two late-type dwarf galaxies that took place after the cluster environment had stripped most of their HI, and that this combined history produced the galaxy seen today. In the authors' reading, the symmetric shell structures visible in deep optical imaging are the signature of a coalesced major merger with comparable-mass progenitors; the central starburst ($600^{+300}_{-140}$ Myr old, stellar mass $2.4\times10^6\,M_\odot$, about $2.9\pm0.5\%$ of the total) sits inside an exponential disk quenched $900^{+630}_{-290}$ Myr ago; and the HI, at $1.4\times10^7\,M_\odot$ with a deficiency of 1.09, is almost entirely within the central $\sim1$ kpc, with a velocity field that cannot be fitted by a rotating disk and is misaligned by roughly $30^\circ$ from the stellar major axis. The interpretation is supported by an equal-mass dwarf merger simulation with initial gas fraction $0.1$, which produces prominent shells, concentrates the residual gas in the center, and forms about $2\%$ new stellar mass, whereas a gas-rich ($f_{\rm gas}=1$) version would create an order of magnitude more stars and suppress the shells. The conclusion is that most of the gas was removed before the final coalescence, so the merger triggered only a modest starburst and the system is now a blue-core dwarf undergoing a late-to-early morphological transition.

Load-bearing premise

The scenario assumes that the two progenitors arrived in the cluster as normal gas-rich late-type dwarfs and lost most of their HI to the environment before the final coalescence; the stripping-before-merger timing is inferred from a statistical infall estimate and a quenching age with broad errors, not directly observed, so if the progenitors were intrinsically gas-poor or the merger itself removed the gas, the environmental part of the claim falls.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the scenario is correct, some blue-core dwarf ellipticals in clusters are produced by a two-step sequence — stripping first, then a damp major merger — rather than by ram-pressure stripping alone.
  • The small starburst fraction (about $3\%$) becomes a usable diagnostic: an environment-damped dwarf merger leaves only a small young central component, unlike an isolated gas-rich merger, which makes many more new stars and can produce a blue compact dwarf.
  • The combination of central HI concentration, misaligned velocity field, and non-circular kinematics is a recognizable post-merger state; other cluster dwarfs showing the same pattern can be flagged for shell searches.
  • VCC 479 is expected to relax into a smooth blue-core dwarf elliptical within roughly a gigayear, offering a direct evolutionary link between the disturbed post-merger systems seen today and the quiescent blue-core dwarfs already catalogued in clusters.
  • Because the gas-rich simulation suppresses shells and creates far more young stars, the shell strength itself is evidence about the gas content of the progenitors at coalescence.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Generalizing the sequence, shell strength and starburst strength could be used as two axes to classify dwarf merger remnants: strong shells with a weak burst imply pre-stripping, strong burst with weak shells implies a gas-rich coalescence; this classification could be tested against a larger sample of merger-candidate dwarfs.
  • If the pathway is common, the number of VCC 479-like objects in a cluster should track its infall history: a burst of accretion roughly one to two gigayears ago would produce a cohort of blue-core dwarfs with similar outer-disk quenching ages, a prediction that could be checked statistically.
  • A test the paper does not run: compare the oxygen abundance of the young core with the metallicity of the old shell stars; if the starburst formed from the leftover stripped-reservoir HI, the two should be close, while a large offset would imply a hidden gas supply or a different stripping history.
  • The misaligned, non-rotating HI velocity field should decay as the remnant relaxes; comparing HI kinematic disorder across a sample of remnants at different post-coalescence ages would test the merger-inflow explanation of the misalignment.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper presents a multi-wavelength case study of the dwarf galaxy VCC 479 in the outskirts of the Virgo cluster, combining NGVS optical imaging, GALEX UV photometry, VESTIGE H-alpha imaging, VLA and FAST HI mapping, an SDSS spectrum, and idealized Ramses/DICE equal-mass dwarf-dwarf merger simulations. The authors identify symmetric stellar shells, decompose the surface brightness into an outer exponential disk and a central Sersic excess, and fit the two components separately with CIGALE. They derive a central starburst that began about 600 Myr ago and contributes 2.9 +/- 0.5% of the stellar mass, embedded in an outer disk quenched about 900 Myr ago. They measure a high HI deficiency (DEF_HI = 1.09), a centrally concentrated HI distribution inside about 1 kpc, and a weak, non-rotating HI velocity field misaligned with the stellar major axis. A gas-poor (fgas = 0.1) merger simulation reproduces prominent shells, central gas concentration, and a young stellar fraction of about 2%, in line with the observed 2.9% value. The paper concludes that environmental stripping before the final coalescence, followed by merger-driven gas inflow and a central starburst, has transformed VCC 479 into a blue-core dwarf in morphological transition from late-type to early-type.

Significance. If the conclusion holds, VCC 479 is one of the first well-documented cases of a coalesced, gas-poor dwarf-dwarf major merger in a cluster environment, and it provides direct evidence linking dwarf mergers to the formation of blue-core dwarf galaxies. The observational core is strong and internally consistent: the shell detection is supported by deep NGVS imaging and slit profiles, the two-component decomposition is performed in four bands, the HI flux is cross-checked between VLA and FAST, and the stellar-population ages are cross-checked between pPXF and CIGALE. The gas-poor versus gas-rich simulation comparison provides a physically motivated explanation for the prominent shells and the modest young stellar fraction. The main weakness is that the timing of environmental stripping relative to the merger is assumed rather than directly tested, so the 'combined effect' conclusion is currently a plausible scenario rather than a demonstrated one.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5, §6.1] The load-bearing premise that most HI was removed by the cluster environment before the final coalescence is not tested by the simulation. In Section 5, the fiducial model is initialized with fgas = 0.1 expressly 'representing the scenario of substantial gas loss prior to the merger'; this initial condition is the post-stripping state, so the simulation can reproduce the observations whether stripping preceded the merger, or whether the merger itself (or an intrinsically low gas fraction) produced the gas-poor state. Section 6.1 then uses the simulation's success as support for the pre-coalescence stripping scenario. A decisive test would require a model that starts with gas-rich progenitors and includes a cluster infall or ram-pressure phase, or at least a systematic exploration of fgas and stripping timing showing that the observed shells, HI concentration, and 2.9% young fraction require pre-stripping. As it stands, the headline 'combined effect of environment stripping and galaxy merger' is a scenario consistent with the data, not a conclusion established by them.
  2. [§3.6.3, §6.1] The SED ages do not establish the required chronological ordering. The central starburst ageburst is 600 +300/-140 Myr and the outer-disk quenching ageburst is 900 +630/-290 Myr (Figure 10); at 1 sigma these intervals overlap substantially, so the photometric SEDs alone do not show that quenching preceded the starburst. The first-infall estimate of about 1-2 Gyr is a statistical inference (Pasquali et al. 2019), and the alternative M49-based crossing time of about 1.3 Gyr is a crude projection-separation estimate. Because these estimates carry the timing of the environmental stripping, the paper should either present a more direct clock for the stripping (for example, stellar population gradients or chemical abundances tied to the stripping event) or explicitly downgrade the conclusion to a conditional scenario.
  3. [§6.1] The claim that ram pressure stripping is 'the most likely mechanism' rests on the truncated HI disk and the current high HI deficiency, but the current ram pressure is effectively zero (Koeppen et al. 2018) and no hydrodynamical infall model of this specific pair is presented. A merger in a gas-poor system can also produce a truncated, centrally concentrated HI distribution with a misaligned velocity field, as the paper's own simulation shows, so the observed HI morphology does not by itself distinguish environmental stripping before the merger from merger-driven gas loss or an intrinsically low gas fraction. This is not a fatal flaw because the wording is carefully hedged, but it means the environmental component of the transformation scenario needs a dedicated test or a more explicit statement of its conditional status.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.1] The sentence beginning 'prominent symmetric shell structures is visible' should read 'are visible'.
  2. [Abstract, §3.6.3] The abstract states the disk was 'quenched ∼1 Gyr ago', while the text gives 900 +630/-290 Myr; using a consistent rounded value and citing the asymmetry of the uncertainty would avoid overstating the precision.
  3. [Figure 15] The axis labels 'Mg' could be misread as magnesium; please typeset as M_g (absolute magnitude) with clear subscript notation.
  4. [§5] The star formation efficiency is given as 0.01; please clarify whether this is the standard efficiency parameter in the Perret et al. (2014) recipe and whether it applies per free-fall time or per local dynamical time.
  5. [Acknowledgements] The acknowledgements thank 'the anonymous referee's highly positive and encouraging report'; such a passage is inappropriate in a submitted manuscript and should be removed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the observational constraints are measured directly, and the simulation's gas-poor initial condition is a stated scenario rather than a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central observational claims—symmetric stellar shells, a centrally concentrated starburst with about 2.9±0.5% of the stellar mass, a quenched outer disk, and a highly HI-deficient galaxy with DEF_HI=1.09 and HI concentrated within the central ~1 kpc—are derived directly from NGVS, SDSS/VESTIGE/GALEX, and VLA/FAST data, with no input from the simulations. The CIGALE burst and quenching ages come from a two-component SED decomposition whose priors do not encode the final mass fraction, and the resulting 2.9±0.5% is an output, not an input. The simulation in Section 5 adopts fgas=0.1 'representing the scenario of substantial gas loss prior to the merger'; this is an explicit initial-condition assumption, and the agreement of the simulated ~2% young stellar fraction with the observed ~2.9% is a consistency check rather than a free prediction. The paper explicitly hedges the stripping-before-coalescence ordering as 'consistent with a scenario' (Section 6.1). Self-citations to Zhang et al. (in prep) and Zhang et al. (2020a,b) concern data reduction and a previously published gas-rich merger comparison; they are supplementary and not load-bearing. No equation reduces a claimed prediction to an input, and no uniqueness theorem is invoked, so no circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's scenario rests on standard tools, including shells as merger tracers, stellar population models, HI deficiency scaling relations, and idealized merger simulations, and on one hand-chosen initial condition, fgas = 0.1, that encodes the central gas-poor hypothesis. No new physical entities are introduced. The main risk is interpretive: the pre-coalescence stripping timeline is inferred, not directly measured.

free parameters (5)
  • Initial gas fraction fgas in fiducial merger simulation = 0.1 (gas mass ~1e7 Msun)
    Hand-chosen in Section 5 to represent substantial pre-merger gas loss; the damp-merger interpretation depends on this value.
  • ageburst of central starburst (CIGALE SED fit) = 600 (+300, -140) Myr
    Fitted to FUV/NUV/optical/Halpha photometry of the central component; anchors the claim that the starburst began about 600 Myr ago (Figure 10).
  • ageburst of outer disk, quenching time (CIGALE SED fit) = 900 (+630, -290) Myr
    Fitted to the outer annulus SED assuming the constant old SFH ends at this age; anchors the claim that the disk was quenched about 1 Gyr ago (Figure 10).
  • Star formation efficiency in Ramses runs = 0.01
    Standard subgrid parameter from Perret et al. (2014), chosen so the gas-rich model matches the main-sequence SFR; it controls the simulated starburst mass fraction (Section 5).
  • Merger orbital configuration = relative velocity 100 km/s; 15 km/s out-of-plane per disk
    Hand-picked low-velocity near-direct collision in Section 5; shell prominence and burst strength depend on orbit, and alternative configurations are deferred to a follow-up paper.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Symmetric shells in dwarf galaxies indicate a recent major merger between comparable-mass progenitors
    Adopted from Paudel et al. (2017) and applied in Sections 3.1 and 6.2 to identify VCC 479 as a coalesced major merger.
  • ad hoc to paper The fiducial simulation initial gas fraction of 0.1 represents the pre-coalescence gas content of VCC 479 after environmental stripping
    Explicitly stated in Section 5 as representing substantial gas loss prior to the merger; this premise is load-bearing for the damp-merger conclusion.
  • domain assumption Bruzual and Charlot (2003) stellar population synthesis models with a Chabrier IMF describe the dwarf stellar populations
    Used in pPXF and CIGALE fitting (Sections 3.4 and 3.6.2); the derived ages and masses depend on these templates.
  • domain assumption The Haynes and Giovanelli (1984) relation with Im-BCD constants gives the expected HI mass before stripping
    Used in Equation (6) of Section 4.1; the reported DEF_HI = 1.09 depends on this morphological-type-dependent relation.
  • domain assumption VCC 479 crossed the Virgo boundary roughly 1 to 2 Gyr ago, based on phase-space statistics
    Used in Section 6.1 to time environmental stripping before coalescence; taken from Pasquali et al. (2019) statistical infall times, not a direct orbital measurement.
  • standard math Truelove condition and Jeans-length refinement ensure the simulations avoid artificial fragmentation
    Standard numerical convergence assumption in Section 5.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of AVID: Formation and evolution of a coalesced major merger of late-type dwarf galaxies (VCC 479) on the outskirts of the Virgo cluster." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JSFA26P7

@misc{pith2026250615268,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: AVID: Formation and evolution of a coalesced major merger of late-type dwarf galaxies (VCC 479) on the outskirts of the Virgo cluster},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JSFA26P7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.15268}
}
abstract

Dwarf-dwarf galaxy mergers are among the least explored aspects of dwarf galaxy pre-processing as they fall into clusters. We present the first case study of a coalesced late-type dwarf major merger (VCC 479; stellar mass $\sim\,8\,\times\,10^7\,\rm M_\odot$) that has undergone significant environmental influence, with the aim of exploring dwarf galaxy evolution under the combined effects of galaxy interactions and environmental processes, and understanding its relevance to the diversity of dwarf galaxies in cluster environments. Our analysis is based on VLA and FAST HI emission line mapping from the Atomic gas in Virgo Interacting Dwarf galaxies (AVID) survey. We also perform idealized hydrodynamical simulations of dwarf-dwarf mergers to help interpret the observations. We identify symmetric stellar shell structures in VCC 479, indicative of a coalesced major merger of dwarf galaxies. The galaxy features a central starburst, initiated $\sim$600 Myr ago, embedded within an exponential disk quenched $\sim$1 Gyr ago. The starburst contributes only 2.9$\pm$0.5\% of the total stellar mass, and VCC 479's global star formation rate is 0.3 dex lower than typical dwarfs of similar mass. The galaxy is highly HI deficient, with most HI gas concentrated within the central 1 kpc and little extended HI envelope. The misalignment of the HI velocity field with the stellar body is best explained by merger-triggered gas inflow, as seen in our simulations. Our analysis is consistent with a scenario that the majority of HI gas of the progenitor galaxies was removed by the cluster environment prior to the final coalescence. The merger concentrates the remaining gas toward the galaxy center, triggering a central starburst. The combined effect of environment stripping and galaxy merger has transformed VCC 479 into a blue-core dwarf undergoing morphological transition from a late-type to an early-type galaxy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.15268 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Color composite image made from NGVS u-, g-, and i-band data. The red cross represents the galaxy center. We in￾dicate the location of the stellar shells with two red arrows. In the top right corner, we present a zoomed-in i-band image of the central 10 arcsec region. The brightest star clusters detected by photutils are delineated with a red contour. 3. Analysis and results from UV-optical observations 3.1. Optical… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Left panel: NGVS g-band image in grayscale. The green ellipse arcs mark the shells. Middle panel: Slit profile of original g￾band image (solid red curve) and unsharp-masked image (solid purple curve). The g−i color slit-profile measured from the smoothed g and i images by ADAPTSMOOTH (Zibetti et al. 2009) is plotted with a dashed blue line. The green vertical lines mark the radii of the stellar shells. Right panel: … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Spatial location of VCC 479 in Virgo cluster. The area in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left panel: VCC galaxies around VCC 479 within 700 kpc and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Surface brightness profiles of VCC 479 in the NGVS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: SDSS spectrum and its best-fitting result by pPXF. The black line represents the observed SDSS spectrum of VCC 479 The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Best-fit SFH by the output of the pPXF without regular [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Left panel: Star formation distribution shown by H [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: SED fitting of the central blue core and outer quenched disk. Left panel: PSF-matched (to GALEX NUV resolution) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Left panel: Best-fit parametric SFH for the outer quenched exponential disk (red) and central starburst (blue). The best-fit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Left panel: Comparison of the FAST and VLA integrated HI spectra. Only pixels with S [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Natural weighted HI moment maps of VLA overlaid on the NGVS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: PV diagram of four directions. Upper left panel: PV diagram along the major axis with PA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Upper panel: SFR evolution of gas-poor major merger [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Re-Mg and µe-Mg scaling relations. The gray dots de￾note the dwarfs in the Virgo core region (Ferrarese et al. 2020), and the orange crosses denote the Virgo UDGs by Roediger et al. (2017). VCC 479 is represented by a red square. whereas the centralized starburst is l…

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

143 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    N., Adelman-McCarthy, J

    Abazajian, K. N., Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., Ag \"u eros, M. A., et al.\ 2009, , 182, 543. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543

    doi:10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543 2009

  2. [2]

    Abraham, R. G. & van Dokkum, P. G.\ 2014, , 126, 55. doi:10.1086/674875

    doi:10.1086/674875 2014

  3. [3]

    C., Evans, N

    Amorisco, N. C., Evans, N. W., & van de Ven, G.\ 2014, , 507, 335. doi:10.1038/nature12995

    work page doi:10.1038/nature12995 2014

  4. [4]

    T., Gordon, K

    Aniano, G., Draine, B. T., Gordon, K. D., et al.\ 2011, , 123, 1218. doi:10.1086/662219

    doi:10.1086/662219 2011

  5. [5]

    doi:10.3847/2041-8205/826/2/L27

    Annibali, F., Nipoti, C., Ciotti, L., et al.\ 2016, , 826, L27. doi:10.3847/2041-8205/826/2/L27

    doi:10.3847/2041-8205/826/2/l27 2016

  6. [6]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab3409

    Annibali, F., Bellazzini, M., Correnti, M., et al.\ 2019, , 883, 19. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab3409

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab3409 2019

  7. [7]

    Barnes, J. E. & Hernquist, L. E.\ 1991, , 370, L65. doi:10.1086/185978

    doi:10.1086/185978 1991

  8. [8]

    K., Garc \' a-Lorenzo, B., Falc \'o n-Barroso, J., et al.\ 2015, , 582, A21

    Barrera-Ballesteros, J. K., Garc \' a-Lorenzo, B., Falc \'o n-Barroso, J., et al.\ 2015, , 582, A21. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424935

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424935 2015

Show all 143 references
  1. [9]

    S., Wechsler, R

    Behroozi, P. S., Wechsler, R. H., Lu, Y., et al.\ 2014, , 787, 156. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/787/2/156

    2014 doi

  2. [10]

    doi:10.1086/311508

    Bekki, K.\ 1998, , 502, L133. doi:10.1086/311508

    1998 doi

  3. [11]

    doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2008.00489.x

    Bekki, K.\ 2008, , 388, L10. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2008.00489.x

    2008

  4. [12]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2005

    Bidaran, B., La Barbera, F., Pasquali, A., et al.\ 2022, , 515, 4622. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2005

    2022 doi

  5. [13]

    A.\ 1985, , 90, 1681

    Binggeli, B., Sandage, A., & Tammann, G. A.\ 1985, , 90, 1681. doi:10.1086/113874

    1985 doi

  6. [14]

    A.\ 1988, , 26, 509

    Binggeli, B., Sandage, A., & Tammann, G. A.\ 1988, , 26, 509. doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.26.090188.002453

    1988

  7. [15]

    G., Schwarz, R

    B \"o hringer, H., Briel, U. G., Schwarz, R. A., et al.\ 1994, , 368, 828. doi:10.1038/368828a0

    1994 doi

  8. [16]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834156

    Boquien, M., Burgarella, D., Roehlly, Y., et al.\ 2019, , 622, A103. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834156

    2019 doi

  9. [17]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201016389

    Boselli, A., Boissier, S., Heinis, S., et al.\ 2011, , 528, A107. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201016389

    2011 doi

  10. [18]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424419

    Boselli, A., Voyer, E., Boissier, S., et al.\ 2014, , 570, A69. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424419

    2014 doi

  11. [19]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629221

    Boselli, A., Roehlly, Y., Fossati, M., et al.\ 2016, , 596, A11. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629221

    2016 doi

  12. [20]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732407

    Boselli, A., Fossati, M., Ferrarese, L., et al.\ 2018, , 614, A56. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732407

    2018 doi

  13. [21]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039046

    Boselli, A., Lupi, A., Epinat, B., et al.\ 2021, , 646, A139. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039046

    2021 doi

  14. [22]

    doi:10.1086/525513

    Boselli, A., Boissier, S., Cortese, L., et al.\ 2008, , 674, 742. doi:10.1086/525513

    2008 doi

  15. [23]

    doi:10.1007/s00159-022-00140-3

    Boselli, A., Fossati, M., & Sun, M.\ 2022, , 30, 3. doi:10.1007/s00159-022-00140-3

    2022 doi

  16. [24]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244267

    Boselli, A., Fossati, M., Roediger, J., et al.\ 2023, , 669, A73. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244267

    2023 doi

  17. [25]

    & Gavazzi, G.\ 2009, , 508, 201

    Boselli, A. & Gavazzi, G.\ 2009, , 508, 201. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912658

    2009 doi

  18. [26]

    H., et al.\ 2000, , 119, 580

    Bravo-Alfaro, H., Cayatte, V., van Gorkom, J. H., et al.\ 2000, , 119, 580. doi:10.1086/301194

    2000 doi

  19. [27]

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/730/1/4

    Bournaud, F., Chapon, D., Teyssier, R., et al.\ 2011, , 730, 4. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/730/1/4

    2011 doi

  20. [28]

    Bruzual, G., & Charlot, S.\ 2003, , 344, 1000

    2003

  21. [29]

    C., et al

    Calzetti , D., Armus , L., Bohlin , R. C., et al. 2000, , 533, 682

    2000

  22. [30]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3020

    Cappellari, M.\ 2017, , 466, 798. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3020

    2017 doi

  23. [31]

    & Emsellem, E.\ 2004, , 116, 138

    Cappellari, M. & Emsellem, E.\ 2004, , 116, 138. doi:10.1086/381875

    2004 doi

  24. [32]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526023

    Catal \'a n-Torrecilla, C., Gil de Paz, A., Castillo-Morales, A., et al.\ 2015, , 584, A87. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526023

    2015 doi

  25. [33]

    Chabrier, G.\ 2003, , 115, 763

    2003

  26. [34]

    N., Paudel, S., Bachchan, R

    Chhatkuli, D. N., Paudel, S., Bachchan, R. K., et al.\ 2023, , 520, 4953. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3700

    2023 doi

  27. [35]

    H., Kenney, J

    Chung, A., van Gorkom, J. H., Kenney, J. D. P., et al.\ 2009, , 138, 1741. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/138/6/1741

    2009 doi

  28. [36]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab25e8

    Chung, J., Rey, S.-C., Sung, E.-C., et al.\ 2019, , 879, 97. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab25e8

    2019 doi

  29. [37]

    T., et al.\ 2019, , 485, 5631

    Cibinel, A., Daddi, E., Sargent, M. T., et al.\ 2019, , 485, 5631. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz690

    2019 doi

  30. [38]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117329

    Corbelli, E., Bianchi, S., Cortese, L., et al.\ 2012, , 542, A32. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117329

    2012 doi

  31. [39]

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/794/2/115

    Deason, A., Wetzel, A., & Garrison-Kimmel, S.\ 2014, , 794, 115. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/794/2/115

    2014 doi

  32. [40]

    W., Dejonghe, H., et al.\ 2003, , 339, 225

    De Rijcke, S., Zeilinger, W. W., Dejonghe, H., et al.\ 2003, , 339, 225. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06171.x

    2003

  33. [41]

    Di Teodoro, E. M. & Fraternali, F.\ 2015, , 451, 3021. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1213

    2015 doi

  34. [42]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732370

    Elbaz, D., Leiton, R., Nagar, N., et al.\ 2018, , 616, A110. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732370

    2018 doi

  35. [43]

    L., Patton, D

    Ellison, S. L., Patton, D. R., Mendel, J. T., et al.\ 2011, , 418, 2043. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19624.x

    2011

  36. [44]

    L., Mendel, J

    Ellison, S. L., Mendel, J. T., Patton, D. R., et al.\ 2013, , 435, 3627. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1562

    2013 doi

  37. [45]

    L., Catinella, B., & Cortese, L.\ 2018, , 478, 3447

    Ellison, S. L., Catinella, B., & Cortese, L.\ 2018, , 478, 3447. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1247

    2018 doi

  38. [46]

    Elson, E.\ 2022, Annual Conference and General Assembly of the, 39

    2022

  39. [47]

    G., Martinez, Z., & Hunter, D

    Elmegreen, B. G., Martinez, Z., & Hunter, D. A.\ 2022, , A Search for Correlations between Turbulence and Star Formation in THINGS Galaxies, 928, 2, 143. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac559c

    2022 doi

  40. [48]

    doi:10.1088/0067-0049/200/1/4

    Ferrarese, L., C \^o t \'e , P., Cuillandre, J.-C., et al.\ 2012, , 200, 4. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/200/1/4

    2012 doi

  41. [49]

    A., et al.\ 2020, , 890, 128

    Ferrarese, L., C \^o t \'e , P., MacArthur, L. A., et al.\ 2020, , 890, 128. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab339f

    2020 doi

  42. [50]

    L.\ 1999, , 111, 63

    Fitzpatrick, E. L.\ 1999, , 111, 63. doi:10.1086/316293

    1999 doi

  43. [51]

    doi:10.1093/pasj/56.1.29

    Fujita, Y.\ 2004, , 56, 29. doi:10.1093/pasj/56.1.29

    2004 doi

  44. [52]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz136

    Fossati, M., Fumagalli, M., Gavazzi, G., et al.\ 2019, , 484, 2212. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz136

    2019 doi

  45. [53]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142309

    Gao, Y., Gu, Q., Shi, Y., et al.\ 2022, , 661, A136. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142309

    2022 doi

  46. [54]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346753

    Gao, Y., Gu, Q., Liu, G., et al.\ 2023, , 677, A179. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346753

    2023 doi

  47. [55]

    R., Yan, R., et al.\ 2012, , 757, 85

    Geha, M., Blanton, M. R., Yan, R., et al.\ 2012, , 757, 85. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/85

    2012 doi

  48. [56]

    Graham, A. W. & Guzm \'a n, R.\ 2003, , 125, 2936. doi:10.1086/374992

    2003 doi

  49. [57]

    doi:10.1086/498891

    Gu, Q., Zhao, Y., Shi, L., et al.\ 2006, , 131, 806. doi:10.1086/498891

    2006 doi

  50. [58]

    Haynes, M. P. & Giovanelli, R.\ 1984, , 89, 758. doi:10.1086/113573

    1984 doi

  51. [59]

    & Katz, N.\ 1989, , 70, 419

    Hernquist, L. & Katz, N.\ 1989, , 70, 419. doi:10.1086/191344

    1989 doi

  52. [60]

    F., Hernquist, L., Cox, T

    Hopkins, P. F., Hernquist, L., Cox, T. J., et al.\ 2008, , 175, 356. doi:10.1086/524362

    2008 doi

  53. [61]

    F., Cox, T

    Hopkins, P. F., Cox, T. J., Hernquist, L., et al.\ 2013, , 430, 1901. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt017

    2013 doi

  54. [62]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad9579

    Huang, Q., Wang, J., Lin, X., et al.\ 2025, , 980, 1, 157. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad9579

    2025 doi

  55. [63]

    A., Ficut-Vicas, D., Ashley, T., et al.\ 2012, , 144, 134

    Hunter, D. A., Ficut-Vicas, D., Ashley, T., et al.\ 2012, , 144, 134. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/144/5/134

    2012 doi

  56. [64]

    doi:10.1088/1674-4527/20/5/64

    Jiang, P., Tang, N.-Y., Hou, L.-G., et al.\ 2020, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 20, 064. doi:10.1088/1674-4527/20/5/64

    2020 doi

  57. [65]

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/812/2/98

    Jimmy, Tran, K.-V., Saintonge, A., et al.\ 2015, , 812, 98. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/812/2/98

    2015 doi

  58. [66]

    doi:10.1007/s11433-023-2333-8

    Jing, Y., Wang, J., Xu, C., et al.\ 2024, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 67, 259514. doi:10.1007/s11433-023-2333-8

    2024 doi

  59. [67]

    J., Eigenthaler, P., Puzia, T

    Johnston, E. J., Eigenthaler, P., Puzia, T. H., et al.\ 2019, , 873, 59. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab0419

    2019 doi

  60. [68]

    E., Greco, J

    Kado-Fong, E., Greene, J. E., Greco, J. P., et al.\ 2020, , 159, 103. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab6ef3

    2020 doi

  61. [69]

    G., Karachentsev, I

    Kashibadze, O. G., Karachentsev, I. D., & Karachentseva, V. E.\ 2020, , 635, A135. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936172

    2020 doi

  62. [70]

    Kenney, J. D. P., Geha, M., J \'a chym, P., et al.\ 2014, , 780, 119. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/780/2/119

    2014 doi

  63. [71]

    C.\ 1998, , 36, 189

    Kennicutt, R. C.\ 1998, , 36, 189. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189

    1998 doi

  64. [72]

    doi:10.1088/0067-0049/215/2/22

    Kim, S., Rey, S.-C., Jerjen, H., et al.\ 2014, , 215, 22. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/215/2/22

    2014 doi

  65. [73]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3480

    Kim, S.-J., Oh, S.-H., Wang, J., et al.\ 2023, , 519, 318. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3480

    2023 doi

  66. [74]

    M., et al.\ 2023, , 675, A108

    Kleiner, D., Serra, P., Maccagni, F. M., et al.\ 2023, , 675, A108. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346461

    2023 doi

  67. [75]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1610

    K \"o ppen, J., J \'a chym, P., Taylor, R., et al.\ 2018, , 479, 4367. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1610

    2018 doi

  68. [76]

    V.\ 2013, , 764, L31

    Kravtsov, A. V.\ 2013, , 764, L31. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/764/2/L31

    2013 doi

  69. [77]

    H., Jeong, H., Chung, J., et al.\ 2024, accepted for publication in Journal of the Korean Astronomical Society, arXiv:2406.13924

    Lee, J. H., Jeong, H., Chung, J., et al.\ 2024, accepted for publication in Journal of the Korean Astronomical Society, arXiv:2406.13924. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2406.13924

    2024 doi arXiv

  70. [78]

    lin ., Shi, Y., Bizyaev, D., et al.\ 2021, , 501, 14

    Li, S.-. lin ., Shi, Y., Bizyaev, D., et al.\ 2021, , 501, 14. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3618

    2021 doi

  71. [79]

    doi:10.1086/508414

    Lisker, T., Glatt, K., Westera, P., et al.\ 2006, , 132, 2432. doi:10.1086/508414

    2006 doi

  72. [80]

    K., & Binggeli, B.\ 2008, , 135, 380

    Lisker, T., Grebel, E. K., & Binggeli, B.\ 2008, , 135, 380. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/135/1/380

    2008 doi

  73. [81]

    doi:10.1002/asna.200911291

    Lisker, T.\ 2009, Astronomische Nachrichten, 330, 1043. doi:10.1002/asna.200911291

    2009 doi

  74. [82]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aadae1

    Lisker, T., Vijayaraghavan, R., Janz, J., et al.\ 2018, , 865, 40. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aadae1

    2018 doi

  75. [83]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1281

    Liu, Y., Zhu, M., Yu, H., et al.\ 2023, , 523, 3905. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1281

    2023 doi

  76. [84]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039803

    Loni, A., Serra, P., Kleiner, D., et al.\ 2021, , 648, A31. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039803

    2021 doi

  77. [85]

    M., Jonsson, P., Cox, T

    Lotz, J. M., Jonsson, P., Cox, T. J., et al.\ 2008, , 391, 1137. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14004.x

    2008

  78. [86]

    M., Obreschkow, D., et al.\ 2015, , 447, 1610

    Maddox, N., Hess, K. M., Obreschkow, D., et al.\ 2015, , 447, 1610. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2532

    2015 doi

  79. [88]

    N., Makarov, D

    Makarova, L. N., Makarov, D. I., Antipova, A. V., et al.\ 2018, , 474, 3221. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2867

    2018 doi

  80. [89]

    P., Waters, B., Schiebel, D., et al.\ 2007, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI, 376, 127

    McMullin, J. P., Waters, B., Schiebel, D., et al.\ 2007, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI, 376, 127

    2007

  81. [90]

    P., C \^o t \'e , P., et al.\ 2007, , 655, 144

    Mei, S., Blakeslee, J. P., C \^o t \'e , P., et al.\ 2007, , 655, 144. doi:10.1086/509598

    2007 doi

  82. [91]

    C., Walker, I

    Mihos, J. C., Walker, I. R., Hernquist, L., et al.\ 1995, , 447, L87. doi:10.1086/309576

    1995 doi

  83. [92]

    Mihos, J. C. & Hernquist, L.\ 1994, , 431, L9. doi:10.1086/187460

    1994 doi

  84. [93]

    Mihos, J. C. & Hernquist, L.\ 1996, , 464, 641. doi:10.1086/177353

    1996 doi

  85. [94]

    L., et al.\ 2021, , 503, 3113

    Moreno, J., Torrey, P., Ellison, S. L., et al.\ 2021, , 503, 3113. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2952

    2021 doi

  86. [95]

    F., Frenk, C

    Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M.\ 1996, , 462, 563. doi:10.1086/177173

    1996 doi

  87. [96]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912497

    Noll, S., Burgarella, D., Giovannoli, E., et al.\ 2009, , 507, 1793. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912497

    2009 doi

  88. [97]

    Osterbrock, D. E. & Ferland, G. J.\ 2006, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei, 2nd. ed. by D.E. Osterbrock and G.J. Ferland. Sausalito, CA: University Science Books, 2006

    2006

  89. [98]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1722

    Pak, M., Rey, S.-C., Lisker, T., et al.\ 2014, , 445, 630. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1722

    2014 doi

  90. [99]

    doi:10.3847/0004-6256/151/6/141

    Pak, M., Paudel, S., Lee, Y., et al.\ 2016, , 151, 141. doi:10.3847/0004-6256/151/6/141

    2016 doi

  91. [100]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3530

    Pasquali, A., Smith, R., Gallazzi, A., et al.\ 2019, , 484, 1702. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3530

    2019 doi

  92. [101]

    R., Ellison, S

    Patton, D. R., Ellison, S. L., Simard, L., et al.\ 2011, , 412, 591. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17932.x

    2011

  93. [102]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/66

    Paudel, S., Smith, R., Duc, P.-A., et al.\ 2017, , 834, 66. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/66

    2017 doi

  94. [103]

    & Sengupta, C.\ 2017, , 849, L28

    Paudel, S. & Sengupta, C.\ 2017, , 849, L28. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa95bf

    2017 doi

  95. [104]

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aadb8d

    Paudel, S., Sengupta, C., & Yoon, S.-J.\ 2018, , 156, 166. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aadb8d

    2018 doi

  96. [105]

    G., Yoon, S.-J., et al.\ 2024, , 976, L18

    Paudel, S., Sabiu, C. G., Yoon, S.-J., et al.\ 2024, , 976, L18. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad8f3c

    2024 doi

  97. [106]

    E., et al.\ 2016, , 459, 1827

    Pearson, S., Besla, G., Putman, M. E., et al.\ 2016, , 459, 1827. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw757

    2016 doi

  98. [107]

    S., Pogge, R

    Peeples, M. S., Pogge, R. W., & Stanek, K. Z.\ 2008, , 685, 904. doi:10.1086/591492

    2008 doi

  99. [108]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322395

    Perret, V., Renaud, F., Epinat, B., et al.\ 2014, , 562, A1. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322395

    2014 doi

  100. [109]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stx919

    Simionescu, A., Werner, N., Mantz, A., et al.\ 2017, , 469, 1476. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx919

    2017 doi

  101. [110]

    A., Chandler, C

    Perley, R. A., Chandler, C. J., Butler, B. J., et al.\ 2011, , 739, L1. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/739/1/L1

    2011 doi

  102. [111]

    & Pagel, B

    Pettini, M. & Pagel, B. E. J.\ 2004, , 348, L59. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07591.x

    2004

  103. [112]

    C., Stierwalt, S., Patton, D

    Privon, G. C., Stierwalt, S., Patton, D. R., et al.\ 2017, , 846, 74. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa8560

    2017 doi

  104. [113]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acbc1c

    Rey, S.-C., Kim, S., Chung, J., et al.\ 2023, , 945, 140. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acbc1c

    2023 doi

  105. [114]

    C., Ferrarese, L., C \^o t \'e , P., et al.\ 2017, , 836, 120

    Roediger, J. C., Ferrarese, L., C \^o t \'e , P., et al.\ 2017, , 836, 120. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/120

    2017 doi

  106. [115]

    S \'a nchez-Janssen, R., M \'e ndez-Abreu, J., & Aguerri, J. A. L.\ 2010, , 406, L65. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2010.00883.x

    2010

  107. [116]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac0f7f

    Sazonova, E., Alatalo, K., Rowlands, K., et al.\ 2021, , Are All Post-starbursts Mergers? HST Reveals Hidden Disturbances in the Majority of PSBs, 919, 2, 134. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac0f7f

    2021 doi

  108. [117]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stv079

    Serra, P., Westmeier, T., Giese, N., et al.\ 2015, , 448, 1922. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv079

    2015 doi

  109. [118]

    D., et al.\ 2018, , 868, 46

    Silva, A., Marchesini, D., Silverman, J. D., et al.\ 2018, , 868, 46. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aae847

    2018 doi

  110. [119]

    Stevens, A. R. H. & Brown, T.\ 2017, , 471, 447. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1596

    2017 doi

  111. [120]

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/2

    Stierwalt, S., Besla, G., Patton, D., et al.\ 2015, , 805, 2. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/2

    2015 doi

  112. [121]

    Sutherland, R. S. & Dopita, M. A.\ 1993, , 88, 253. doi:10.1086/191823

    1993 doi

  113. [122]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730499

    Tempel, E., Tuvikene, T., Kipper, R., et al.\ 2017, , 602, A100. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730499

    2017 doi

  114. [123]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011817

    Teyssier, R.\ 2002, , 385, 337. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011817

    2002 doi

  115. [124]

    doi:10.1088/2041-8205/720/2/L149

    Teyssier, R., Chapon, D., & Bournaud, F.\ 2010, , 720, L149. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/720/2/L149

    2010 doi

  116. [125]

    J., Kewley, L., et al.\ 2012, , 746, 108

    Torrey, P., Cox, T. J., Kewley, L., et al.\ 2012, , 746, 108. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/746/1/108

    2012 doi

  117. [126]

    K., Klein, R

    Truelove, J. K., Klein, R. I., McKee, C. F., et al.\ 1997, , 489, L179. doi:10.1086/310975

    1997 doi

  118. [127]

    Tully, R. B. & Trentham, N.\ 2008, , 135, 1488. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/135/4/1488

    2008 doi

  119. [128]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730897

    Urich, L., Lisker, T., Janz, J., et al.\ 2017, , 606, A135. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730897

    2017 doi

  120. [129]

    S., & Ricker, P

    Vijayaraghavan, R., Gallagher, J. S., & Ricker, P. M.\ 2015, , 447, 3623. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2761

    2015 doi

  121. [130]

    N., Boselli, A., Boissier, S., et al.\ 2014, , 569, A124

    Voyer, E. N., Boselli, A., Boissier, S., et al.\ 2014, , 569, A124. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322511

    2014 doi

  122. [131]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1881

    Westmeier, T., Kitaeff, S., Pallot, D., et al.\ 2021, , 506, 3962. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1881

    2021 doi

  123. [132]

    E., McIntosh, D

    Weston, M. E., McIntosh, D. H., Brodwin, M., et al.\ 2017, , 464, 3882. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2620

    2017 doi

  124. [133]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acafe8

    Wang, J., Yang, D., Oh, S.-H., et al.\ 2023, , 944, 102. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acafe8

    2023 doi

  125. [134]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3e61

    Wang, J., Lin, X., Yang, D., et al.\ 2024, , 968, 48. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3e61

    2024 doi

  126. [135]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staf273

    Wang, S., Wang, J., Lee-Waddell, K., et al.\ 2025, , 538, 327. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf273

    2025 doi

  127. [136]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adbbe8

    Yang, D., Wang, J., Qu, Z., et al.\ 2025, , 984, 1, 15. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adbbe8

    2025 doi

  128. [138]

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab7825

    Zhang, H.-X., Paudel, S., Smith, R., et al.\ 2020, , 891, L23. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab7825

    2020 doi

  129. [139]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abab96

    Zhang, H.-X., Smith, R., Oh, S.-H., et al.\ 2020, , 900, 152. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abab96

    2020 doi

  130. [140]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2f2d

    Zhang, L.-Y., Zhao, Y., & Zhang, H.-X.\ 2024, , 965, 3. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2f2d

    2024 doi

  131. [141]

    doi:10.1088/0004-6256/141/2/68

    Zhao, Y., Gu, Q., & Gao, Y.\ 2011, , 141, 68. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/141/2/68

    2011 doi

  132. [142]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2016

    Zhou, Y., Chen, Y., Shi, Y., et al.\ 2022, , 515, 5081. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2016

    2022 doi

  133. [143]

    doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15528.x

    Zibetti, S., Charlot, S., & Rix, H.-W.\ 2009, , 400, 1181. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15528.x

    2009

  134. [144]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sent...

  135. [145]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.