300 mm Wafer-Scale SiN Platform for Broadband Soliton Microcombs Compatible with Alkali Atomic References

Alin Antohe; Gregory Moille; Kartik Srinivasan; Lewis G. Carpenter; Shao-Chien Ou

300 mm Wafer-Scale SiN Platform for Broadband Soliton Microcombs Compatible with Alkali Atomic References

T0 review · 0 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A 300 mm wafer-scale PECVD silicon nitride platform generates broadband soliton microcombs that reach cesium and rubidium clock lines.

desk verdict Solid 300 mm PECVD SiN microcomb demonstration with honest yield data; the thickness-only dispersion attribution is the softest spot but is not central to the result. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.20895 v1 pith:T2EHEBKO submitted 2025-06-26 physics.optics physics.app-ph

Shao-Chien Ou , Alin Antohe , Lewis G. Carpenter , Gregory Moille , Kartik Srinivasan This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.opticsphysics.app-ph

keywords dissipativeKerrsolitonssolitonmicrocombssiliconnitridePECVD300mmwaferscaleatomicclocktransitionsmicroringresonatorsdispersionengineering

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to establish that a 300 mm wafer-scale silicon nitride platform, deposited by low-temperature, low-stress plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD), can support broadband dissipative Kerr soliton microcombs at wavelengths that overlap cesium and rubidium atomic clock transitions. Current silicon nitride microcombs are made with high-temperature LPCVD, which is hard to scale to 300 mm wafers and difficult to co-integrate with electronics and active photonic components. The authors report consistent low insertion loss, intrinsic quality factors near one million, and a wafer-wide thickness variation of about ±2 percent, and they show single-soliton combs with spectra covering roughly 210–380 THz. They further show that the wafer's thickness variation places each reticle field into one of three dispersion regimes—single soliton, near-zero dispersion, or none—so thickness acts as a tunable knob for dispersion and comb generation.

What carries the argument

The central object is the 300 mm wafer-scale PECVD silicon nitride film, about 700 nm thick, with microring resonators of 23 µm radius and 820 nm width designed to have weak anomalous group-velocity dispersion near 283 THz. The paper's argument is carried by three components: the microring geometry that enables dispersive-wave phase matching at both ends of the spectrum, the wafer thickness map that changes the dispersion from field to field, and the measurement of the integrated dispersion $D_{\mathrm{int}}(\mu)$ that connects observed comb spectra to simulation. A counter-propagating, cross-polarized 'cooler' laser at 310 THz stabilizes the thermal state while the pump is tuned.

What would settle it

Measure the ring width, sidewall angle, and film stoichiometry at several reticle fields and include those measured quantities in the dispersion simulation alongside the independently measured local thickness; if the measured $D_{\mathrm{int}}$ can only be reproduced when the width or sidewall is allowed to vary beyond the values reported, then the paper's assertion that thickness variation alone is the primary cause would be falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that a 300 mm foundry PECVD process can produce thick (~700 nm) silicon nitride microrings whose quality factors and comb performance are comparable to those of LPCVD-grown devices on smaller wafers. Pumped at 283 THz (1060 nm) with a thermal-stabilizing auxiliary laser, the resonators generate single dissipative Kerr solitons whose spectra span roughly 210–380 THz, covering the Cs D2 (852 nm), Cs D1 (894 nm), and Rb D1 (795 nm) transitions. Measured integrated dispersion matches simulation when the local film thickness is taken into account, and the thickness variation across the wafer sorts the 64 reticle fields into three regimes: bright single DKS states, near-zero-dispersion solitons, and fields where no comb forms. The conclusion is that this platform is a credible route to mass-manufacturable optical clocks, LiDAR, and quantum sensing devices.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that, across the whole wafer, the only property that varies enough to matter is the silicon nitride film thickness; if ring width, sidewall angle, film composition, or stress also fluctuate from field to field, the three-regime classification and the dispersion simulations could match by coincidence rather than because thickness is the true control knob.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the platform is viable, silicon nitride microcombs can be made on 300 mm wafers in a low-temperature process, removing the wafer-size and co-integration bottlenecks of LPCVD.
Comb spectra that overlap Cs and Rb clock lines bring chip-scale optical clocks and quantum sensors closer to mass production, since the host process is compatible with standard foundry workflows.
The ±2% thickness variation, though currently limiting single-DKS yield to 26 of 64 reticle fields, can be turned into a design lever: thickening the nominal film should push a larger fraction of the wafer into the single-DKS regime.
Auxiliary-laser thermal stabilization, already used here, becomes a standard part of the control recipe for producing these combs on a uniform platform.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the thickness-only model is correct, a post-fabrication thickness map could serve as a predictive screen: reticle fields whose measured thickness falls in the single-DKS window could be selected for packaging without optical testing, effectively raising usable yield.
The same wafer could be used as a multi-purpose nonlinear photonics platform: single-DKS fields for broadband combs, near-zero-dispersion fields for switching-wave or soliton-crystal studies, and normal-dispersion fields for other nonlinear optics—an unintentional but potentially useful heterogeneity.
Because the paper attributes the three regimes to dispersion rather than loss or coupling, a direct test is to vary the pump wavelength (or use post-fabrication cladding) on a fixed field; if the predicted regime change follows the thickness model, the causal link would be strengthened.
If thickness uniformity can be improved to ±1% or better, the authors' own reasoning suggests single-DKS yield could approach 100%, which would make the platform immediately attractive for commercial clock and LiDAR development.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Bottom line: this is a well-executed experimental demonstration that a 300 mm foundry PECVD SiN process can produce Q~1e6 microrings and support broadband DKS combs overlapping alkali lines. The genuinely new contribution is the quantitative wafer-scale yield analysis — 26 of 64 reticle fields in single DKS, 30 near-zero-dispersion, 13 no comb, with 5 showing both DKS and NZD states — presented in a three-regime classification. That, plus the systematic linear statistics (173 TE0 and 121 TM0 resonances with Q fits and confidence intervals), is real added value over the prior conference report.

The linear characterization is careful, and the Dint comparison to simulations is honest: they compare, not fit, and the agreement for two representative fields is shown with both spectra and Dint curves. The central claim — that this platform works — is directly evidenced by the measured combs and does not depend on any causal story about why dispersion varies across the wafer.

The soft spot, as flagged, is the thickness-only attribution. In the section "We next study the impact of the SiN thickness variation," they assume fixed width, radius, and material dispersion, and attribute inter-field dispersion differences purely to the measured ±2% thickness variation. They do not report across-wafer measurements of width, sidewall angle, stoichiometry, or stress. If any of those co-vary with thickness, the three-regime classification anchored to thickness could be confounded, and the "bias the average thickness to get full-wafer DKS" strategy becomes speculative. That said, this is a weakness in the explanatory framing, not in the primary result. The paper itself is appropriately cautious about needing better thickness uniformity for precise higher-order dispersion.

One minor overreach in the title: "Compatible with Alkali Atomic References" means the comb spectra overlap Cs and Rb transitions — they do not demonstrate actual locking or referencing. But the abstract says "compatible," which is accurate enough for a Letter.

Who this is for: people working on foundry-scale microcomb manufacturing, PECVD SiN integration with active photonics, or dispersion engineering for visible/near-IR combs. They get a clear, reproducible-feeling data set and a step toward co-integration at 300 mm scale.

Verdict: this deserves a serious referee. I would accept with minor revisions, asking the authors to either measure or explicitly caveat the other geometric/material variations across the wafer before leaning on the thickness-only causal story.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper reports a 300 mm wafer-scale PECVD SiN platform (~700 nm thick) developed at AIM Photonics for Kerr soliton microcombs. It presents a wafer thickness map with ±2% variation, per-facet insertion loss of (2.02±0.11) dB, and intrinsic Q values extracted from fits to 173 TE0 and 121 TM0 resonances, with most probable Qi near 0.84×10^6 (TE0) and 0.69×10^6 (TM0). Pumping at 283 THz and using a 310 THz counter-propagating cooler laser, the authors demonstrate single DKS combs with spectra spanning roughly 210–380 THz and overlapping the Cs D1/D2 and Rb D1 lines. Measured Dint curves are compared with simulations that use the measured thickness and show good agreement. Across 64 reticle fields, they classify 26 fields with single DKS generation, 30 with near-zero-dispersion soliton states, 13 with no comb generation, and 5 where both DKS and NZD states are observed; they attribute the variation to thickness and suggest that biasing average thickness or adding width variation could give full-wafer access.

Significance. If correct, these results are an important advance: they show that a lower-temperature PECVD process at 300 mm foundry scale can produce Q≈10^6 microrings and support bright soliton combs whose spectra reach alkali D-line wavelengths. The linear characterization is careful, with confidence intervals on Q fits and a reasonably large statistical sample (173 TE0 and 121 TM0 resonances). A particular strength is that the Dint comparison does not use the comb data to fit a free dispersion model: the simulations are anchored to the measured thickness and standard SiN parameters, and the measured Dint comes from wavemeter-calibrated resonance frequencies. The yield accounting (26 + 30 + 13 with 5 fields counted twice gives 64 unique fields) is internally consistent. The main caveat—that wafer-wide dispersion variation is attributed to thickness alone without direct metrology of width, sidewall profile, or stoichiometry—does not invalidate the central demonstration of 300 mm PECVD soliton microcombs, but it should be stated more cautiously.

minor comments (4)

[§4 and Fig. 4] The statement that ‘thickness variation should be the primary cause of varying dispersion between reticle fields’ is stronger than the presented evidence supports, because wafer-scale measurements of ring width, sidewall angle, and film stoichiometry are not reported. Since the proposed strategy of biasing the average thickness to access DKS states across the full wafer depends on this attribution, the text should either present additional uniformity data or rephrase the conclusion as consistency with a thickness-dominated model.
[§3 and Fig. 3] The manuscript does not specify the simulation parameters used to compute the Dint curves, such as the assumed material dispersion model, sidewall angle, and whether the nominal width of 820 nm was used for all fields. Because the Dint agreement is a key dispersion-engineering claim, a sentence stating these inputs would materially improve reproducibility.
[§3] The phrase ‘the widest spans going from approximately 210 THz to 380 THz’ is ambiguous: it is unclear whether this span is realized by a single device spectrum or is the union of the best spectra from different reticle fields. Please clarify, and consider specifying the corresponding wavelength range explicitly.
[§4] When reporting the wafer-state statistics, the overlap between the 26 single-DKS fields and the 30 NZD fields is not stated directly. Explicitly noting that 51 of the 64 fields exhibit some nonlinear state (26 + 30 – 5) would make the enumeration easier to follow.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the 300 mm PECVD soliton microcomb demonstration rests on direct optical measurements and independently parameterized dispersion simulations; self-citations are contextual.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are experimental: wafer-scale linear characterization (insertion loss, intrinsic Q) and soliton comb spectra with Dint extracted from wavemeter-calibrated resonance measurements. The simulated Dint curves in Figs. 3c-d and 4c use the independently measured SiN thickness (Fig. 2a) and nominal geometry with standard material parameters; they are compared, not fitted, to measured Dint and dispersive-wave zero crossings. No parameter is fit to the comb output and then renamed as a prediction. Self-citations (Refs. [2], [18], [24], [29], [30], [37]) supply prior DKS theory, alkali-target design context, and synthetic-dispersive-wave mechanisms, but the present 300 mm PECVD demonstration does not depend on those citations for its evidence. The thickness-only dispersion attribution on page 3 is an assumption about confounding variables, not a circular derivation: even if width or stoichiometry co-varied, the core demonstration of high-Q resonators and DKS combs on a 300 mm platform stands on direct measurement.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on design geometry (chosen by hand), measured thickness, and the assumption that PECVD SiN behaves like LPCVD SiN under the standard comb model. No new physical entities are introduced. The main unverified input is the assumption that thickness alone drives dispersion variation across the wafer.

free parameters (2)

Microring design geometry (RR, RW, G, W) = RR=23 um, RW=820 nm, G=350 nm, W=500 nm
Chosen by design simulation to target weak anomalous group-velocity dispersion near 283 THz; the central dispersion-engineering claim depends on this geometry, but it is a design input, not a data fit.
Auxiliary cooler laser parameters (frequency 310 THz, counter-propagating, cross-polarized) = 310 THz cooler, counter-propagating, cross-polarized
Used for thermal stabilization; the synthetic dispersive wave observed in the spectra is attributed to this laser, so the interpretation of the comb spectra depends on this operating condition.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption PECVD SiN has fixed, known material dispersion at all points on the wafer
Used in all Dint simulations; non-stoichiometry or hydrogen content variations could shift dispersion (section 'We next study the impact of the SiN thickness variation').
domain assumption Thickness variation is the dominant cause of dispersion differences across the wafer, with RW, sidewall angle, and stress constant
Stated in the paragraph 'As we choose a fixed nominal RW and RR and assume fixed material dispersion...'; underpins the three-regime classification in Fig. 4a.
domain assumption Standard dissipative Kerr soliton theory (Lugiato-Lefever framework) applies to these PECVD resonators without additional loss or nonlinear mechanisms
The interpretation of steps in comb power evolution and the low-noise DKS state relies on this standard model; no independent verification of the soliton temporal profile is provided.
domain assumption The counter-propagating, cross-polarized cooler laser stabilizes the thermal state without corrupting the DKS spectrum beyond the noted synthetic dispersive wave
The comb spectra are attributed to the single DKS state while the cooler laser is on; the synthetic DW is acknowledged in the Fig. 3 caption.
standard math Maxwell's equations and the mode-solver used for dispersion simulations are standard
The simulation methodology is conventional for this field and not the subject of the paper's claims.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of 300 mm Wafer-Scale SiN Platform for Broadband Soliton Microcombs Compatible with Alkali Atomic References." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/T2EHEBKO

@misc{pith2026250620895,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: 300 mm Wafer-Scale SiN Platform for Broadband Soliton Microcombs Compatible with Alkali Atomic References},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/T2EHEBKO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.20895}
}

abstract

Chip-integrated optical frequency combs (OFCs) based on Kerr nonlinear resonators are of great significance given their scalability and wide range of applications. Broadband on-chip OFCs reaching visible wavelengths are especially valuable as they address atomic clock transitions that play an important role in position, navigation, and timing infrastructure. Silicon nitride (SiN) deposited via low pressure chemical vapor deposition (LPCVD) is the usual platform for the fabrication of chip-integrated OFCs, and such fabrication is now standard at wafer sizes up to 200 mm. However, the LPCVD high temperature and film stress poses challenges in scaling to larger wafers and integration with electronic and photonic devices. Here, we report the linear performance and broadband frequency comb generation from microring resonators fabricated on 300 mm wafers at AIM Photonics, using a lower temperature, lower stress plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition process that is suitable for thick ($\approx$ 700 nm) SiN films and compatible with electronic and photonic integration. The platform exhibits consistent insertion loss, high intrinsic quality factor, and thickness variation of $\pm$2 % across the whole 300 mm wafer. We demonstrate broadband soliton microcomb generation with a lithographically tunable dispersion profile extending to wavelengths relevant to common alkali atom transitions. These results are a step towards mass-manufacturable devices that integrate OFCs with electronic and active photonic components, enabling advanced applications including optical clocks, LiDAR, and beyond.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

[1]

S. A. Diddams, K. Vahala, and T. Udem, Optical fre- quency combs: Coherently uniting the electromagnetic spectrum, Science369, eaay3676 (2020)

2020
[2]

Moille, J

G. Moille, J. Stone, M. Chojnacky, R. Shrestha, U. A. Javid, C. Menyuk, and K. Srinivasan, Kerr-induced syn- chronization of a cavity soliton to an optical reference, Nature624, 267 (2023)

work page 2023
[3]

Suh, Q.-F

M.-G. Suh, Q.-F. Yang, K. Y. Yang, X. Yi, and K. J. Vahala, Microresonator soliton dual-comb spectroscopy, Science354, 600 (2016)

work page 2016
[4]

Obrzud, M

E. Obrzud, M. Rainer, A. Harutyunyan, M. H. Ander- son, J. Liu, M. Geiselmann, B. Chazelas, S. Kundermann, S. Lecomte, M. Cecconi, A. Ghedina, E. Molinari, F. Pepe, F. Wildi, F. Bouchy, T. J. Kippenberg, and T. Herr, A mi- crophotonic astrocomb, Nature Photonics13, 31 (2019)

work page 2019
[5]

Riemensberger, A

J. Riemensberger, A. Lukashchuk, M. Karpov, W. Weng, E. Lucas, J. Liu, and T. J. Kippenberg, Massively parallel coherent laser ranging using a soliton microcomb, Nature 581, 164 (2020)

2020
[6]

T. J. Kippenberg, A. L. Gaeta, M. Lipson, and M. L. Gorodetsky, Dissipative Kerr solitons in optical microres- onators, Science361, eaan8083 (2018)

2018
[7]

D. Bose, M. W. Harrington, A. Isichenko, K. Liu, J. Wang, N. Chauhan, Z. L. Newman, and D. J. Blumenthal, Anneal-free ultra-low loss silicon nitride integrated pho- tonics, Light: Science & Applications13, 156 (2024)

work page 2024
[8]

Z. Ye, A. F¨ ul¨ op,´O. B. Helgason, P. A. Andrekson, and V. Torres-Company, Low-loss high-Q silicon-rich silicon 5 nitride microresonators for Kerr nonlinear optics, Optics Letters44, 3326 (2019)

work page 2019

Show all 37 references

[9]

Mu˜ noz, G

P. Mu˜ noz, G. Mic´ o, L. A. Bru, D. Pastor, D. P´ erez, J. D. Dom´ enech, J. Fern´ andez, R. Ba˜ nos, B. Gargallo, R. Alemany, A. M. S´ anchez, J. M. Cirera, R. Mas, and C. Dom ´ ınguez, Silicon nitride photonic integration plat- forms for visible, near-infrared and mid-infra...

2017
[10]

Ikeda, R

K. Ikeda, R. E. Saperstein, N. Alic, and Y. Fainman, Ther- mal and Kerr nonlinear properties of plasma-deposited silicon nitride/silicon dioxide waveguides, Optics Express 16, 12987 (2008)

2008
[11]

Zhang, T

S. Zhang, T. Bi, I. Harder, O. Ohletz, F. Gannott, A. Gu- mann, E. Butzen, Y. Zhang, and P. Del’Haye, Low- temperature sputtered ultralow-loss silicon nitride for hybrid photonic integration, Laser & Photonics Reviews 18, 2300642 (2024)

2024
[12]

H. Park, C. Zhang, M. A. Tran, and T. Komljenovic, Heterogeneous silicon nitride photonics, Optica7, 336 (2020)

2020
[13]

J. Liu, G. Huang, R. N. Wang, J. He, A. S. Raja, T. Liu, N. J. Engelsen, and T. J. Kippenberg, High-yield, wafer- scale fabrication of ultralow-loss, dispersion-engineered silicon nitride photonic circuits, Nature Communications 12, 2236 (2021)

2021
[14]

Z. Ye, H. Jia, Z. Huang, C. Shen, J. Long, B. Shi, Y.- H. Luo, L. Gao, W. Sun, H. Guo, J. He, and J. Liu, Foundry manufacturing of tight-confinement, dispersion- engineered, ultralow-loss silicon nitride photonic inte- grated circuits, Photonics Research11, 558 (2023)

2023
[15]

El Dirani, L

H. El Dirani, L. Youssef, C. Petit-Etienne, S. Kerdiles, P. Grosse, C. Monat, E. Pargon, and C. Sciancalepore, Ultralow-loss tightly confining Si 3 N4 waveguides and high-Q microresonators, Optics Express27, 30726 (2019)

2019
[16]

X. Ji, Y. Okawachi, A. Gil-Molina, M. Corato-Zanarella, S. Roberts, A. L. Gaeta, and M. Lipson, Ultra-Low-Loss Silicon Nitride Photonics Based on Deposited Films Com- patible with Foundries, Laser & Photonics Reviews17, 2200544 (2023)

2023
[17]

H. Liu, I. Dickson, A. Antohe, L. G. Carpenter, J. Zang, A. R. Carollo, A. Dan, J. A. Black, and S. B. Papp, Implementing photonic-crystal resonator frequency combs in a photonic foundry, Optics Letters50, 2570 (2025)

2025
[18]

S.-C. Ou, A. Antohe, L. G. Carpenter, G. Moille, and K. Srinivasan, Broadband Kerr soliton frequency combs reaching visible wavelengths in two different 300 mm foundry-based SiN platforms, Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics , 4258172 (2025)

2025
[19]

Moille, D

G. Moille, D. Westly, G. Simelgor, and K. Srinivasan, Impact of the precursor gas ratio on dispersion engineering of broadband silicon nitride microresonator frequency combs, Optics Letters46, 5970 (2021)

2021
[20]

Chiles, N

J. Chiles, N. Nader, D. D. Hickstein, S. P. Yu, T. C. Briles, D. Carlson, H. Jung, J. M. Shainline, S. Diddams, S. B. Papp, S. W. Nam, and R. P. Mirin, Deuterated silicon nitride photonic devices for broadband optical frequency comb generation, Optics Letters43, 1527 (2018)

2018
[21]

Y. Xie, J. Li, Y. Zhang, Z. Wu, S. Zeng, S. Lin, Z. Wu, W. Zhou, Y. Chen, and S. Yu, Soliton frequency comb generation in CMOS-compatible silicon nitride microres- onators, Photonics Research10, 1290 (2022)

2022
[22]

Frigg, A

A. Frigg, A. Boes, G. Ren, T. G. Nguyen, D.-Y. Choi, S. Gees, D. Moss, and A. Mitchell, Optical frequency comb generation with low temperature reactive sputtered silicon nitride waveguides, APL Photonics5, 011302 (2020)

2020
[23]

Zhang, T

S. Zhang, T. Bi, I. Harder, O. Ohletz, F. Gannott, A. Gu- mann, E. Butzen, Y. Zhang, and P. Del’Haye, Low- Temperature Sputtered Ultralow-Loss Silicon Nitride for Hybrid Photonic Integration, Laser & Photonics Reviews 18, 2300642 (2024)

2024
[24]

S.-P. Yu, T. C. Briles, G. T. Moille, X. Lu, S. A. Did- dams, K. Srinivasan, and S. B. Papp, Tuning Kerr-soliton frequency combs to atomic resonances, Physical Review Applied11, 044017 (2019)

2019
[25]

S. Kar, N. W. Gangi, K. A. Morgan, L. G. Carpenter, N. M. Fahrenkopf, and C. V. Baiocco, Advanced metrol- ogy of thick silicon nitride films at 300 mm scale for next generation high-q photonic devices, 2024 35th Annual SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Confer- ence (AS...

2024
[26]

C. O. de Beeck, B. Haq, L. Elsinger, A. Gocalinska, E. Pelucchi, B. Corbett, G. Roelkens, and B. Kuyken, Het- erogeneous III-V on silicon nitride amplifiers and lasers via microtransfer printing, Optica7, 386 (2020)

2020
[27]

Cuyvers, A

S. Cuyvers, A. Hermans, M. Kiewiet, J. Goyvaerts, G. Roelkens, K. V. Gasse, D. V. Thourhout, and B. Kuyken, Heterogeneous integration of Si photodiodes on silicon nitride for near-visible light detection, Optics Letters47, 937 (2022)

2022
[28]

Ferraro, P

F. Ferraro, P. De Heyn, M. Kim, N. Rajasekaran, M. Berciano, G. Muliuk, D. Bode, G. Lepage, S. Janssen, R. Magdziak, J. De Coster, H. Kobbi, S. Lardenois, N. Golshani, L. Shiramin, C. Marchese, S. Rajmohan, S. Nadarajan, N. Singh, S. Radhakrishnan, A. Tsiara, P. Xu, A. Karagoz...

2023
[29]

Moille, E

G. Moille, E. F. Perez, J. R. Stone, A. Rao, X. Lu, T. S. Rahman, Y. K. Chembo, and K. Srinivasan, Ultra- broadband Kerr microcomb through soliton spectral trans- lation, Nature Communications12, 7275 (2021)

2021
[30]

Moille, P

G. Moille, P. Shandilya, A. Niang, C. Menyuk, G. Carter, and K. Srinivasan, Versatile optical frequency division with Kerr-induced synchronization at tunable micro- comb synthetic dispersive waves, Nature Photonics19, 36 (2025)

2025
[31]

Zhang, J

S. Zhang, J. M. Silver, L. Del Bino, F. Copie, M. T. M. Woodley, G. N. Ghalanos, A. Ø. Svela, N. Moroney, and P. Del’Haye, Sub-milliwatt-level microresonator solitons with extended access range using an auxiliary laser, Optica 6, 206 (2019)

2019
[32]

H. Zhou, Y. Geng, W. Cui, S.-W. Huang, Q. Zhou, K. Qiu, and C. Wei Wong, Soliton bursts and deterministic dissi- pative Kerr soliton generation in auxiliary-assisted micro- cavities, Light: Science & Applications8, 50 (2019)

2019
[33]

M. H. Anderson, W. Weng, G. Lihachev, A. Tikan, J. Liu, and T. J. Kippenberg, Zero dispersion Kerr solitons in optical microresonators, Nature Communications13, 4764 (2022)

2022
[34]

Z. Xiao, T. Li, M. Cai, H. Zhang, Y. Huang, C. Li, B. Yao, K. Wu, and J. Chen, Near-zero-dispersion soliton and broadband modulational instability Kerr microcombs in anomalous dispersion, Light: Science & Applications12, 33 (2023). 6

2023
[35]

Okawachi, K

Y. Okawachi, K. Saha, J. S. Levy, Y. H. Wen, M. Lipson, and A. L. Gaeta, Octave-spanning frequency comb gen- eration in a silicon nitride chip, Optics Letters36, 3398 (2011)

2011
[36]

Brasch, M

V. Brasch, M. Geiselmann, T. Herr, G. Lihachev, M. H. P. Pfeiffer, M. L. Gorodetsky, and T. J. Kippenberg, Pho- tonic chip–based optical frequency comb using soliton Cherenkov radiation, Science351, 357 (2016)

2016
[37]

Moille, D

G. Moille, D. Westly, N. G. Orji, and K. Srinivasan, Tailoring broadband Kerr soliton microcombs via post- fabrication tuning of the geometric dispersion, Applied Physics Letters119, 121103 (2021)

2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

S. A. Diddams, K. Vahala, and T. Udem, Optical fre- quency combs: Coherently uniting the electromagnetic spectrum, Science369, eaay3676 (2020)

2020

[2] [2]

Moille, J

G. Moille, J. Stone, M. Chojnacky, R. Shrestha, U. A. Javid, C. Menyuk, and K. Srinivasan, Kerr-induced syn- chronization of a cavity soliton to an optical reference, Nature624, 267 (2023)

work page 2023

[3] [3]

Suh, Q.-F

M.-G. Suh, Q.-F. Yang, K. Y. Yang, X. Yi, and K. J. Vahala, Microresonator soliton dual-comb spectroscopy, Science354, 600 (2016)

work page 2016

[4] [4]

Obrzud, M

E. Obrzud, M. Rainer, A. Harutyunyan, M. H. Ander- son, J. Liu, M. Geiselmann, B. Chazelas, S. Kundermann, S. Lecomte, M. Cecconi, A. Ghedina, E. Molinari, F. Pepe, F. Wildi, F. Bouchy, T. J. Kippenberg, and T. Herr, A mi- crophotonic astrocomb, Nature Photonics13, 31 (2019)

work page 2019

[5] [5]

Riemensberger, A

J. Riemensberger, A. Lukashchuk, M. Karpov, W. Weng, E. Lucas, J. Liu, and T. J. Kippenberg, Massively parallel coherent laser ranging using a soliton microcomb, Nature 581, 164 (2020)

2020

[6] [6]

T. J. Kippenberg, A. L. Gaeta, M. Lipson, and M. L. Gorodetsky, Dissipative Kerr solitons in optical microres- onators, Science361, eaan8083 (2018)

2018

[7] [7]

D. Bose, M. W. Harrington, A. Isichenko, K. Liu, J. Wang, N. Chauhan, Z. L. Newman, and D. J. Blumenthal, Anneal-free ultra-low loss silicon nitride integrated pho- tonics, Light: Science & Applications13, 156 (2024)

work page 2024

[8] [8]

Z. Ye, A. F¨ ul¨ op,´O. B. Helgason, P. A. Andrekson, and V. Torres-Company, Low-loss high-Q silicon-rich silicon 5 nitride microresonators for Kerr nonlinear optics, Optics Letters44, 3326 (2019)

work page 2019