Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 48 references

Global strong solution of the 3D compressible liquid crystal flows with density-dependent viscosity and large velocity

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For 3D compressible liquid crystals with density-dependent viscosity, a unique global strong solution exists for arbitrarily large initial velocity whenever the background density is large and the director gradient is small.

desk verdict The theorem is new and the bootstrap idea is sound, but Lemma 3.7 contains a load-bearing sign error in the density equation that breaks the closing estimate as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.04760 v1 pith:JLMJTVOK submitted 2025-07-07 math.AP

Jiaxu Li , Yu Mei , Rong Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35Q3576N1035A0135B65
keywords compressibleliquidcrystalflowsdensity-dependentviscosityglobalstrongsolutionslargevelocityEricksen-LesliesystemaprioriestimatesCauchyproblem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves a global existence theorem for the three-dimensional simplified Ericksen–Leslie system for compressible liquid crystal flows, with viscosity coefficients $\mu_i(\rho)=\mu_i\rho^\alpha$ growing as powers of the density with $\alpha>1$. It shows that for any admissible initial velocity, however large, a unique global strong solution exists provided the background density $\bar\rho$ is sufficiently large and the $L^3$ norm of the gradient of the initial director field is sufficiently small. This is, according to the paper, the first global strong result for three-dimensional compressible liquid crystal flows that imposes no smallness on the initial velocity. The mechanism is that the effective Reynolds number $\rho u L/\mu_i(\rho)=\rho^{1-\alpha}uL$ becomes small when $\alpha>1$ and the density is large, so density-dependent dissipation controls fast flows regardless of their speed. The theorem is proved by a bootstrap of a priori estimates in which large-density constants absorb the size of the velocity data.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the observation that the effective Reynolds number $Re=\rho uL/\mu_i(\rho)=\rho^{1-\alpha}uL$ is small when $\alpha>1$ and the density $\rho$ is large, so dissipation dominates convection independently of how large the velocity is. The proof implements this through a priori estimates built on the effective viscous flux $F=(2\mu_1+\mu_2)\operatorname{div}u+P(\rho)-P(\bar\rho)$ and the vorticity $w=\operatorname{curl}u$, which turn the momentum equation into an elliptic system whose right-hand sides can be bounded by powers of $\bar\rho$; Gronwall-type arguments then close the estimates. The smallness of $\|\nabla d_0\|_{L^3}$ is the critical-space condition that keeps the supercritical nonlinearity $|\nabla d|^2d$ and the constraint $|d|=1$ under control.

What would settle it

Run the local well-posedness argument cited as [37] on the density-dependent stress tensor $\operatorname{div}(\rho^\alpha(2\mu_1 Du+\mu_2\operatorname{div}u\, I_3))$ and look for admissible data satisfying (1.10)–(1.11) for which no local strong solution with the regularity (2.1) exists, or for which the norm $\|\nabla u\|_{H^1}$ becomes unbounded in finite time before the bootstrap can be restarted; any such example would falsify Lemma 2.1 and hence Theorem 1.1.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 1.1: under $\alpha>1$, $\gamma>1$, $\alpha>(\gamma+1)/2$ and $\alpha\ge \gamma-1$, with initial data satisfying $\rho_0\in[3\bar\rho/4,5\bar\rho/4]$, $\rho_0-\bar\rho\in D^{1,2}\cap D^{1,q}$, $G(\rho_0)\in L^1$, $u_0\in H^2$ and $d_0-e\in H^3$, there exist constants $\Lambda_0$ and $\varepsilon_0$ such that if $\bar\rho\ge\Lambda_0$ and $\|\nabla d_0\|_{L^3}\le\varepsilon_0$, the Cauchy problem (1.1)–(1.7) admits a unique global strong solution on $\mathbb{R}^3\times(0,\infty)$. The solution keeps the density in $[2\bar\rho/3,4\bar\rho/3]$ and has the regularity listed in (1.13). The paper presents this as the first global strong result for three-dimensional compressible liquid crystal flows without smallness of the velocity.

Load-bearing premise

Lemma 2.1, the local strong-existence theorem for this exact density-dependent viscosity system, is stated without proof and attributed by 'similar arguments' to a reference that is not shown to cover $\mu_i(\rho)=\mu_i\rho^\alpha$ with $\alpha>1$; if that transfer fails for some data satisfying (1.10), the global theorem has no starting point.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any fixed admissible initial velocity $u_0\in H^2$, however large, the theorem gives global well-posedness once the background density $\bar\rho$ is chosen large enough.
  • Because $\Lambda_0$ depends on $\|u_0\|_{H^2}$, the largeness of $\bar\rho$ is chosen after the velocity is fixed; for a given $\bar\rho$ only velocities up to a certain $H^2$ size are admitted.
  • Taking $d_0\equiv e$ reduces the system to the isentropic compressible Navier–Stokes equations with density-dependent viscosity, so the theorem covers large-velocity global strong solutions for that subsystem in the same parameter range.
  • The only smallness imposed on the director is the critical-space norm $\|\nabla d_0\|_{L^3}$; higher derivatives of the director and the whole velocity can be large.
  • The density stays between $2\bar\rho/3$ and $4\bar\rho/3$ for all time, so no vacuum or density concentration develops, even for initial data with arbitrarily large velocity.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same Reynolds-number suppression could plausibly remove velocity smallness in neighbouring coupled systems with power-law density-dependent viscosities, such as compressible magnetohydrodynamics or heat-conducting fluids, once analogous effective-flux and vorticity estimates are closed; the paper does not treat those systems.
  • The authors state that the director smallness cannot be removed by their approach because of the supercritical term $|\nabla d|^2d$ and the constraint $|d|=1$; a testable alternative would be to replace the $L^3$ smallness by a weaker critical Besov smallness or by a geometric condition such as $d_0$ lying in a hemisphere, as used in the incompressible weak-solution theory.
  • A quantitative version of the theorem would track how $\Lambda_0$ grows with $\|u_0\|_{H^2}$; the paper only asserts existence of such a constant, so the exact trade-off between velocity size and required background density is left open.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the Cauchy problem for the three-dimensional compressible simplified Ericksen-Leslie system with density-dependent viscosities $\mu_i(\rho)=\mu_i\rho^\alpha$. The main result, Theorem 1.1, asserts that for $\alpha>1$, $\gamma>1$, $\alpha>(\gamma+1)/2$, $\alpha\ge \gamma-1$, and initial data satisfying (1.10), there exist thresholds $\Lambda_0$ and $\varepsilon_0$ such that if the far-field density $\bar\rho$ is sufficiently large and $\|\nabla d_0\|_{L^3}$ is sufficiently small, then the system admits a unique global strong solution with no smallness assumption on the initial velocity. The proof is a bootstrap argument organized in Section 3: estimates for the director (Lemmas 3.1--3.3), for the velocity (Lemmas 3.4--3.6), and for the density (Lemma 3.7), followed by the continuation argument in Section 4.

Significance. If the theorem is correct, it would be the first global strong solution result for three-dimensional compressible liquid crystal flows with density-dependent viscosity and large velocity. The underlying mechanism---that for $\alpha>1$ large density makes the effective Reynolds number small regardless of the flow speed---is natural and the bootstrap structure is coherent. The paper also gives explicit dependence of the thresholds on the initial data and attempts to keep the director smallness in the critical space $L^3$. However, the proof as written contains load-bearing algebraic errors, most seriously in the density estimate of Lemma 3.7, and several definitions and identities in Lemma 3.4 are not self-consistent. No machine-checked proofs are supplied; the claims rest on hand-written estimates that must be corrected and re-verified.

major comments (4)
  1. [Lemma 3.7, Eq. (3.81)] The gradient of the continuity equation is computed with the wrong sign. From (1.1)_1 one obtains $\nabla\rho_t+u\cdot\nabla^2\rho+\nabla u\cdot\nabla\rho+\nabla\rho\,\mathrm{div}\,u+\rho\nabla\,\mathrm{div}\,u=0$. With $F=(2\mu_1+\mu_2)\mathrm{div}\,u+P(\rho)-P(\bar\rho)$ as in (3.35), the relation $\nabla\,\mathrm{div}\,u=(\nabla F-\nabla P)/(2\mu_1+\mu_2)$ holds, so the last term in (3.81) should contain $\nabla F-\nabla P$, not $\nabla F+\nabla P$. With the printed plus sign, multiplication by $|\nabla\rho|^{q-2}\nabla\rho$ and integration produce a positive source $a\gamma/(2\mu+\lambda)\int\rho^{\gamma-\alpha}|\nabla\rho|^q\,dx$ instead of the dissipation used in (3.82). Since (3.83)--(3.87), (3.92), and the improved density bounds in Proposition 3.1 all rely on this dissipation, the sign error is load-bearing and the estimate must be corrected before the continuation argument can be accepted.
  2. [Lemma 2.1 / Section 4] Local well-posedness is stated without proof and attributed to [37] via "similar arguments". Because the viscosities here are $\mu_i(\rho)=\mu_i\rho^\alpha$ with $\alpha>1$ and the continuation argument in Section 4 restarts the solution from the improved bounds (3.9), the transfer of the local existence result to this exact system is a load-bearing premise. The manuscript should either prove Lemma 2.1 or give a precise reference that explicitly covers the present system, including the density-dependent viscosity and the director equation. In addition, Section 4 refers to "Theorem 2.1", but the stated result is Lemma 2.1.
  3. [Lemma 3.7, Eq. (3.92)] The interpolation estimate for $E_{\rho,1}$ is written with the wrong power of $\bar\rho$. By the Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequality, $\|\rho-\bar\rho\|_{L^\infty}\le C\|\rho-\bar\rho\|_{L^2}^{2(q-3)/(5q-6)}\|\nabla\rho\|_{L^q}^{3q/(5q-6)}$. Using (3.11) gives $\|\rho-\bar\rho\|_{L^2}\le C\bar\rho^{(3-\gamma)/2}$, so the exponent of $\bar\rho$ should contain the factor $(3-\gamma)/2$ multiplying $2(q-3)/(5q-6)$. The printed expression omits this factor, and consequently the definition of $\Lambda_4$ in (3.93) does not follow from the displayed estimate. Please correct the exponent and recompute the threshold.
  4. [Lemma 3.4, Eqs. (3.34)-(3.37)] The notation and algebraic identities in this lemma are not self-consistent. The symbol $\lambda$ is used for the second viscosity coefficient, although $\lambda$ already denotes the director diffusion coefficient in (1.1)_3. The definition of $H$ in (3.34) has signs that do not match the divergence of the momentum equation as written, and (3.36) states $-\Delta F=\mathrm{div}\,H$, which is not consistent with the definition $F=(2\mu_1+\mu_2)\mathrm{div}\,u+P-P(\bar\rho)$ in (3.35). Since the $L^p$ estimates (3.38)--(3.45) are used repeatedly in Lemmas 3.5--3.7, please clarify the notation, correct the identities, and verify that the stated estimates remain valid with the corrected definitions.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (3.82)] The factors $1/p$ and the exponent $p-2$ in (3.82) should be $1/q$ and $q-2$; the notation switches between $p$ and $q$ within the same display.
  2. [Eq. (3.11)] The term $\|G(\rho_0)\|_{L^1}^\gamma$ should presumably be $\|G(\rho_0)\|_{L^1}$; the exponent $\gamma$ is unexplained and is not consistent with the energy inequality being proved.
  3. [Section 4, Eqs. (4.2)-(4.4)] In (4.2) and (4.4), the expression $\sup \|\nabla u_0\|^2$ should be $\sup \|\nabla u(t)\|^2$, and the time interval in the definition of $T_1^*$ should be $[0,T]$ rather than $[0,T_1]$.
  4. [Theorem 1.1, Eq. (1.13)] The notation $C([0,T;H^3])$ and $L^2(0,T;H^4)$ should be written as $C([0,T];H^3)$ and $L^2(0,T;H^4)$; moreover, the theorem states existence on $(0,\infty)$ but (1.13) is written with a generic $T$.
  5. [Lemma 3.1, Eq. (3.18)] The bound $\int_0^T\|\nabla u\|^4\,dt\le C\|\nabla u_0\|^2\bar\rho^{1-\alpha}$ is not directly justified by the preceding line; it should be derived from the $E_{u,1}$ assumption in (3.8) together with the energy estimate (3.11), or the argument should be expanded.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the a priori estimates are self-contained, with only motivational self-citations and a deferred external local-existence lemma.

full rationale

The paper's global existence claim is not derived from its own assumptions by construction. The bootstrap estimates in Lemmas 3.1-3.7 are proven from the PDE system (1.1) using standard energy estimates, elliptic estimates for the effective viscous flux, Gronwall inequalities, and Sobolev inequalities; no quantity called a prediction is fitted to data, and no parameter is defined in terms of the target estimate. The only self-citations are [16] and [27] in the introduction, where they are described as motivation, not as proof ingredients; neither enters the derivation chain of Theorem 1.1. Lemma 2.1 is an external local-existence input attributed to [37]; even if the transfer to the density-dependent viscosity system is not fully justified in the text, that is a soundness or completeness concern, not circular reasoning. The skeptical sign issue in (3.81)-(3.82) is an algebraic correctness question and does not make the argument circular. Accordingly, no specific circular step of any of the enumerated kinds can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard functional inequalities, a deferred local-existence lemma, and the structural assumptions of the model. No empirical fitting or invented entities appear.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Standard Gagliardo-Nirenberg and Sobolev interpolation inequalities hold in R3.
    Invoked as Lemma 2.2 and used throughout Lemmas 3.1-3.7; these are standard background results.
  • domain assumption Local existence and uniqueness of a strong solution on a short time interval (Lemma 2.1).
    Stated without proof and attributed to [37] via 'similar arguments.' The present system has density-dependent viscosities of the form (1.4), so the transfer from [37] is an unverified assumption.
  • domain assumption The constraint |d| = 1 and the far-field behavior (1.7) justify identities such as Delta d dot d = -|grad d|^2 and boundary terms vanish.
    These identities are used in Lemma 3.1, equation (3.16), and elsewhere; they follow from the model but are assumptions on the solution class.
  • domain assumption Viscosity coefficients are exactly power functions mu_i(rho) = mu_i rho^alpha with alpha > 1.
    The whole proof depends on the explicit form (1.4); for general density-dependent viscosities no result is claimed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Global strong solution of the 3D compressible liquid crystal flows with density-dependent viscosity and large velocity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JLMJTVOK

@misc{pith2026250704760,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Global strong solution of the 3D compressible liquid crystal flows with density-dependent viscosity and large velocity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JLMJTVOK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.04760}
}
abstract

This paper concerns the Cauchy problem of three-dimensional compressible liquid crystal flows with density-dependent viscosity. When the viscosity coefficients $\mu_1(\rho),\mu_2(\rho)$ are power functions of the density with the power larger than $1$, it is proved that the system exists a unique global strong solution as long as the initial density is sufficiently large and $L^3$-norm of the derivative of the initial director is sufficiently small. This is the first result concerning the global strong solution for three-dimensional compressible liquid crystal flows without smallness of velocity.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [48]

    Zhong and X

    X. Zhong and X. Zhou, Global well-posedness to the Cauchy problem of 2D compressible nematic liquid crystal flows with large initial data and vacuum , Math. Ann., 390 (2024), pp. 1541–1581. 24

    work page 2024

  2. [16]

    Huang, J

    X. Huang, J. Li, and R. Zhang, Global large strong solutions to the compressible Navier- Stokes equations with density-dependent viscosities, case I: isentropic flows , arXiv e-prints, (2024), p. arXiv:2408.04305

    arXiv 2024

  3. [37]

    Ma, Classical solutions for the compressible liquid crystal flows with nonnegative initial densities, J

    S. Ma, Classical solutions for the compressible liquid crystal flows with nonnegative initial densities, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 397 (2013), pp. 595–618

    work page 2013

  4. [1]

    Bresch and B

    D. Bresch and B. Desjardins , Some diffusive capillary models of korteweg type , Comptes Rendus Mecanique, 332 (2004), pp. 881–886

    work page 2004

  5. [2]

    Bresch, A

    D. Bresch, A. F. V asseur, and C. Yu, Global existence of entropy-weak solutions to the compressible navier–stokes equations with non-linear density dependent viscosities, Journal of the European Mathematical Society, 24 (2021), pp. 1791–1837

    work page 2021

  6. [3]

    Y. Cao, H. Li, and S. Zhu , Global regular solutions for one-dimensional degenerate compressible navier–stokes equations with large data and far field vacuum , SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 54 (2022), pp. 4658–4694

    work page 2022

  7. [4]

    Chang, W

    K.-C. Chang, W. Y. Ding, and R. Ye, Finite-time blow-up of the heat flow of harmonic maps from surfaces , J. Differential Geom., 36 (1992), pp. 507–515

    work page 1992

  8. [5]

    Y. M. Chen and M. Struwe , Existence and partial regularity results for the heat flow for harmonic maps , Math. Z., 201 (1989), pp. 83–103

    work page 1989

Show all 48 references
  1. [6]

    Cho and H

    Y. Cho and H. Kim, Unique solvability for the density-dependent navier–stokes equations, Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, 59 (2004), pp. 465–489

    2004

  2. [7]

    Coron, Nonuniqueness for the heat flow of harmonic maps , Ann

    J.-M. Coron, Nonuniqueness for the heat flow of harmonic maps , Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire, 7 (1990), pp. 335–344

    1990

  3. [8]

    D ´avila, M

    J. D ´avila, M. del Pino, and J. Wei , Singularity formation for the two-dimensional harmonic map flow into S2, Invent. Math., 219 (2020), pp. 345–466

    2020

  4. [9]

    Eells, Jr

    J. Eells, Jr. and J. H. Sampson, Harmonic mappings of Riemannian manifolds , Amer. J. Math., 86 (1964), pp. 109–160

    1964

  5. [10]

    J. L. Ericksen , Conservation laws for liquid crystals , Transactions of the Society of Rheology, 5 (1961), pp. 23–34

    1961

  6. [11]

    X. F an, J. Li, and J. Li, Global existence of strong and weak solutions to 2d compressible navier–stokes system in bounded domains with large data and vacuum , Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 245 (2022), pp. 239–278

    2022

  7. [12]

    Feireisl, A

    E. Feireisl, A. Novotn´y, and H. Petzeltov´a, On the existence of global defined weak solutions to he Navier-Stokes equations , J. Math. Fluid Mech., 3 (2001), pp. 358–392

    2001

  8. [13]

    Freire, Uniqueness for the harmonic map flow in two dimensions , Calc

    A. Freire, Uniqueness for the harmonic map flow in two dimensions , Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations, 3 (1995), pp. 95–105

    1995

  9. [14]

    J. Gao, Q. Tao, and Z.-a. Yao , Long-time behavior of solution for the compressible nematic liquid crystal flows in R3, J. Differential Equations, 261 (2016), pp. 2334–2383

    2016

  10. [15]

    Huang and J

    X. Huang and J. Li , Global well-posedness of classical solutions to the cauchy problem of two-dimensional barotropic compressible navier–stokes system with vacuum and large initial data , SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 54 (2022), pp. 3192–3214. 22

    2022

  11. [17]

    X. D. Huang, J. Li, and Z. Xin, Global well-posedness of classical solutions with large os- cillations and vacuum to the three-dimensional isentropic compressible navier-stokes equa- tions, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 65 (2012), pp. 549–585

    2012

  12. [18]

    Jiang, S

    F. Jiang, S. Jiang, and D. W ang, On multi-dimensional compressible flows of nematic liquid crystals with large initial energy in a bounded domain , J. Funct. Anal., 265 (2013), pp. 3369–3397

    2013

  13. [19]

    , Global weak solutions to the equations of compressible flow of nematic liquid crystals in two dimensions , Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 214 (2014), pp. 403–451

    2014

  14. [20]

    Jiang and P

    S. Jiang and P. Zhang, On spherically symmetric solutions of the compressible isentropic Navier-Stokes equations, Comm. Math. Phys., 215 (2001), pp. 559–581

    2001

  15. [21]

    Q. Jiu, Y. W ang, and Z. Xin , Global well-posedness of the cauchy problem of two- dimensional compressible navier–stokes equations in weighted spaces, Journal of Differential Equations, 255 (2013), pp. 351–404

    2013

  16. [22]

    , Global classical solution to two-dimensional compressible navier–stokes equations with large data in r2 , Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 376-377 (2018), pp. 180–194. Special Issue: Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations in Mathematical Fluid Dynamics

    2018

  17. [23]

    Kazhikhov and V

    A. Kazhikhov and V. V aigant, On the existence of global solutions of two-dimensional navier-stokes equations of a compressible viscous fluid , Siberian Math. J, 36 (1995), pp. 1108–1141

    1995

  18. [24]

    O. A. Ladyzhenskaia, V. A. Solonnikov, and N. N. Ural’tseva, Linear and quasi- linear equations of parabolic type , vol. 23, American Mathematical Soc., 1968

    1968

  19. [25]

    F. M. Leslie , Some constitutive equations for liquid crystals , Archive for Rational Me- chanics and Analysis, 28 (1968), pp. 265–283

    1968

  20. [26]

    Li and Z

    J. Li and Z. Liang , On local classical solutions to the cauchy problem of the two- dimensional barotropic compressible navier–stokes equations with vacuum , Journal de Math´ ematiques Pures et Appliqu´ ees, 102 (2014), pp. 640–671

    2014

  21. [27]

    J. Li, Y. Mei, and R. Zhang , Global strong solution of the 3D inhomogeneous liquid crystal flows with density-dependent viscosity and large velocity , arXiv e-prints, (2024), p. arXiv:2410.11881

    2024 arXiv

  22. [28]

    Li and Z

    J. Li and Z. Xin , Global well-posedness and large time asymptotic behavior of classical solutions to the compressible Navier-Stokes equations with vacuum , Ann. PDE, 5 (2019), pp. Paper No. 7, 37

    2019

  23. [29]

    Li and Z

    J. Li and Z. P. Xin , Global existence of weak solutions to the barotropic compressible navier-stokes flows with degenerate viscosities , arXiv:1504.06826, (2015)

    2015 arXiv

  24. [30]

    J. Li, Z. Xu, and J. Zhang , Global existence of classical solutions with large oscillations and vacuum to the three-dimensional compressible nematic liquid crystal flows , J. Math. Fluid Mech., 20 (2018), pp. 2105–2145

    2018

  25. [31]

    Y. Li, R. Pan, and S. Zhu , On classical solutions to 2d shallow water equations with degenerate viscosities, J. Math. Fluid Mech., 15 (2017). 23

    2017

  26. [32]

    , On classical solutions for viscous polytropic fluids with degenerate viscosities and vacuum, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 234 (2019)

    2019

  27. [33]

    Lin and C

    F. Lin and C. W ang , Global existence of weak solutions of the nematic liquid crystal flow in dimension three , Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 69 (2016), pp. 1532–1571

    2016

  28. [34]

    J. Lin, B. Lai, and C. W ang , Global finite energy weak solutions to the compressible nematic liquid crystal flow in dimension three , SIAM J. Math. Anal., 47 (2015), pp. 2952– 2983

    2015

  29. [35]

    P. L. Lions, Existence globale de solutions pour les ´ equations de navier-stokes compress- ibles isentropiques, C.R. Acad. Sci., 316 (1993), pp. 1335–1340

    1993

  30. [36]

    , Mathematical Topics in Fluid Mechanics: Compressible Models v.2 , Oxford Univer- sity Press, 1998

    1998

  31. [38]

    Matsumura and T

    A. Matsumura and T. Nishida , The initial value problem for the equations of motion of viscous and heat-conductive gases , J. Math. Kyoto Univ., 20 (1980), pp. 67–104

    1980

  32. [39]

    Struwe, On the evolution of harmonic mappings of Riemannian surfaces , Comment

    M. Struwe, On the evolution of harmonic mappings of Riemannian surfaces , Comment. Math. Helv., 60 (1985), pp. 558–581

    1985

  33. [40]

    Differential Geom., 28 (1988), pp

    , On the evolution of harmonic maps in higher dimensions , J. Differential Geom., 28 (1988), pp. 485–502

    1988

  34. [41]

    Sun and X

    Y. Sun and X. Zhong , Global strong solutions to the compressible nematic liquid crystal flows with large oscillations and vacuum in 2D bounded domains, J. Geom. Anal., 33 (2023), pp. Paper No. 319, 44

    2023

  35. [42]

    V asseur and C

    C. V asseur and C. Yu, Existence of global weak solutions for 3d degenerate compressible navier- stokes equations , Invent. math., (2016), pp. 1–40

    2016

  36. [43]

    W ang, Global existence and large time behavior of strong solutions to the 2-D compress- ible nematic liquid crystal flows with vacuum, J

    T. W ang, Global existence and large time behavior of strong solutions to the 2-D compress- ible nematic liquid crystal flows with vacuum, J. Math. Fluid Mech., 18 (2016), pp. 539–569

    2016

  37. [44]

    Wen and X

    H. Wen and X. Zhang , Global existence of large solution to the isothermal compressible navier–stokes equations with degenerate viscosity and vacuum , SIAM Journal on Mathe- matical Analysis, 57 (2025), pp. 1280–1314

    2025

  38. [45]

    Xin and S

    Z. Xin and S. Zhu , Global well-posedness of regular solutions to the three-dimensional isentropic compressible navier-stokes equations with degenerate viscosities and vacuum , Advances in Mathematics, 393 (2021), p. 108072

    2021

  39. [46]

    Z. P. Xin and S. G. Zhu , Well-posedness of three-dimensional isentropic compressible navier-stokes equations with degenerate viscosities and far field vacuum , J. Math. Pures Appl., 152 (2021)

    2021

  40. [47]

    H. Yu, Global existence of strong solutions to the 3d isentropic compressible navier–stokes equations with density-dependent viscosities , Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sci- ences, 46 (2023), pp. 10123–10136

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.