Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 89 references

Physical properties of HII regions at sub-kpc scales using integral field spectroscopy on IC 342

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Resolved into 1,155 HII regions at 32-pc scales, the nearby spiral IC 342 shows oxygen abundances, star-formation tracers, and kinematics that match galaxies of similar stellar mass in the nearby universe.

desk verdict Valuable new IC 342 IFS mosaic and HII region catalog; the typicality claim mostly holds, but the oxygen-gradient comparison in Fig. 18 needs reworking. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.05414 v1 pith:7ZO7ZFQC submitted 2025-07-07 astro-ph.GA

J. K. Barrera-Ballesteros , S. F. Sanchez , K. Kreckel , A. Lugo-Aranda , H. Ibarra-Medel , L. Carigi , N. Drory , D.Bizyaev
show 2 more authors
J. E. Mendez Delgado Guillermo Blanc
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords HIIregionsIC342integralfieldspectroscopyMaNGAoxygenabundancegradientHαluminosityfunctionLocalVolumeMapperstar-forminggalaxies
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that the ionized-gas properties of HII regions in the nearby grand-design spiral IC 342, measured at sub-kiloparsec scales, are similar to those of galaxies of similar stellar mass in the nearby universe. The study builds the most complete optical integral-field dataset of IC 342 to date, a mosaic of 349 individual pointings, and extracts 1,155 HII region candidates, of which 960 are classified as star-forming. The central results are a nearly flat radial oxygen abundance gradient with a central abundance close to solar, and an H$\alpha$ luminosity function with slope $\alpha = 1.9 \pm 0.1$ and $\log(L_{\min}/\mathrm{erg\,s^{-1}}) = 37.1\pm0.1$, both consistent with populations seen in large integral-field surveys. If the claim holds, it justifies using one very nearby, high-resolution galaxy as a bridge between sub-kpc physics and the statistical behavior of thousands of galaxies.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the combined dataset and pipeline: 349 MaNGA pointings mosaicked into a contiguous optical datacube with roughly 32 pc resolution, processed with the LVM data analysis pipeline, which fits a resolved stellar continuum and Gaussian emission-line profiles for 192 lines. HII regions are defined by pyHIIextractor on the H$\alpha$ flux map with a threshold of $\sim 5\times10^{-18}\ \mathrm{erg\,s^{-1}\,\AA^{-1}}$ and a maximum region size of 2.5 arcsec; per-region integrated fluxes drive the derived properties, including Balmer-decrement extinction and Ho (2019) oxygen abundances, and the H$\alpha$ luminosity function is fit as a power-law probability density $p(L) \propto L^{-\alpha}$ following the Santoro et al. (2022) method.

What would settle it

Rerun pyHIIextractor on the same H$\alpha$ mosaic with a lower flux threshold (e.g., $1\times10^{-18}\ \mathrm{erg\,s^{-1}\,\AA^{-1}}$) or with single-spaxel regions included; if the best-fit oxygen abundance gradient slope moves outside the MaNGA distribution or the H$\alpha$ luminosity function slope changes by more than its quoted uncertainty, the central similarity claim would be undermined. A direct cross-check would be to compare the four long-slit HII regions previously measured by McCall et al. (1985) with the corresponding mosaic regions at the same radii.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that at 32 pc spatial resolution, IC 342's HII regions show the same radial distributions of extinction, H$\alpha$ luminosity, oxygen abundance, N/O ratio, electron density, ionization parameter, and velocity dispersion as HII regions in samples of nearby galaxies observed at coarser resolution. The oxygen abundance gradient, derived with the Ho (2019) calibrator as fiducial among 23 calibrators, is flat on average with a zero-point near the solar value, and its slope and zero-point fall within the distribution of 7,533 MaNGA galaxies of comparable stellar mass. The H$\alpha$ luminosity function, fitted with a power law to the probability density, yields a slope comparable to the steepest in the PHANGS-MUSE sample, and the ionized-gas kinematics show a flat velocity dispersion around 30 km/s. The paper uses these results to argue that this galaxy is a representative local benchmark, and that the analysis pipeline tested here is ready for application to the upcoming wide-field Local Volume survey.

Load-bearing premise

The results depend on the HII region catalog set by pyHIIextractor, where the flux threshold ($\sim 5\times10^{-18}\ \mathrm{erg\,s^{-1}\,\AA^{-1}}$) and maximum region size (2.5 arcsec) were chosen by visual inspection and single-spaxel regions were removed; if this choice preferentially hides faint or small regions, the measured radial gradients and the H$\alpha$ luminosity function would change, weakening the comparison with other galaxies.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • IC 342 can serve as a high-resolution benchmark: its flat oxygen abundance gradient and near-solar central abundance place it inside the normal scatter of similar-mass galaxies in the MaNGA survey.
  • The H$\alpha$ luminosity function slope and minimum luminosity for IC 342 fall inside the PHANGS-MUSE galaxy range, so its giant HII region population is not anomalous.
  • The positive correlation between ionization parameter and oxygen abundance at high metallicity seen in IC 342 supports the idea that this relation reverses sign at high abundances, as suggested for other samples.
  • The successful application of the LVM-DAP to this 349-pointing mosaic demonstrates that the pipeline can produce coherent emission-line maps for Local Volume science.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the H$\alpha$ luminosity function is fit only down to an L$_{min}$ set by completeness, the reported slope of 1.9 is conditional on the extraction threshold; a deeper extraction on the same mosaic would directly test how much of the shape is real versus selection-driven.
  • The flat oxygen abundance gradient may indicate efficient radial mixing or a recent gas accretion episode in IC 342, but the paper does not test these scenarios.
  • Because IC 342 sits behind high foreground Milky Way extinction, its similarity to other galaxies implies that extinction-corrected emission-line ratios are robust to strong foreground reddening, a useful check for other heavily obscured local galaxies.
  • Applying the same pipeline to other nearby galaxies at comparable resolution would show whether the sub-kpc HII region property distributions measured here are universal or specific to IC 342.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a 349-pointing MaNGA ancillary IFS mosaic of the nearby grand-design spiral IC 342, reduced with a prototype of the SDSS-V LVM data analysis pipeline. The authors detect HII-region candidates with pyHIIextractor, apply BPT and EW(Halpha) criteria to define a final sample of 960 star-forming regions, and derive radial distributions of extinction, Halpha luminosity, EW, oxygen abundance (using the Ho 2019 calibrator), N/O, electron density, ionization parameter, and kinematics. They also derive the Halpha luminosity function and compare its power-law parameters with PHANGS-MUSE, and compare the oxygen-abundance gradient slope and zero-point with MaNGA galaxies (Barrera-Ballesteros et al. 2023). The central claim is that the physical properties of the ionized gas in IC 342, especially the oxygen abundance gradient, are similar to those of galaxies of comparable stellar mass in the nearby universe.

Significance. If the main claims hold, this is a valuable dataset paper: it provides the most comprehensive optical IFS view of IC 342 at ~32 pc resolution, demonstrates the LVM-DAP on a nearby galaxy, and offers a bridge between sub-kpc HII-region studies and large IFS surveys. The Halpha luminosity function comparison with PHANGS-MUSE is a strong and well-executed part of the paper, with Monte Carlo uncertainties. The public availability of the maps and the explicit use of 23 abundance calibrators to test gradient systematics are also positive features. However, the headline 'typicality' conclusion currently rests on a single comparison in Fig. 18 that is not tracer- or scale-matched, and the radial gradient fits are reported without uncertainties; these issues need to be addressed before the central claim can be considered quantitatively established.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 7, Fig. 18] The comparison in Fig. 18 is not tracer- or scale-matched: the IC 342 point is a single-slope fit to 960 compact, high-EW star-forming HII regions at ~32 pc resolution, whereas the MaNGA comparison (Barrera-Ballesteros et al. 2023) is likely based on kpc-resolution radial profiles that include diffuse ionized gas and all spaxels. Because DIG contamination and spatial smoothing can systematically alter line ratios and abundance gradients (generally flattening them), the apparent agreement may partly reflect resolution and tracer differences rather than physical similarity. Please demonstrate robustness by (i) deriving the IC 342 gradient also from all spaxels or annuli in the same datacube, or (ii) comparing with HII-region-selected gradients from PHANGS-MUSE or AMUSING++ at comparable spatial scales. Without this, the statement in Sec. 7 that IC 342 'shares similar radial properties' with MaNGA galaxies is not yet established.
  2. [Sec. 4, Figs. 3–13] All radial gradient fits are quoted without uncertainties (e.g., the A_V gradient slope -0.18 mag/kpc and zero-point 2.21 mag in Sec. 4.1; the oxygen abundance gradient described as 'rather flat' in Sec. 4.2; and the N/O, n_e, and log(U) gradients in Secs. 4.3–4.4). Without error bars on the fitted slopes and zero-points, the reader cannot judge whether the oxygen abundance gradient is statistically consistent with flat, nor whether the IC 342 value is consistent with the MaNGA distribution in Fig. 18. Please report bootstrap or Monte Carlo uncertainties on every fitted slope and zero-point, and include confidence intervals in Fig. 18.
  3. [Sec. 3.1] The HII region catalog depends on thresholds (Halpha flux ~5e-18 erg/s/A, maximum size ~2.5 arcsec, plus exclusion of one-spaxel regions) that are selected by visual inspection. Because this catalog feeds all radial gradients and the Halpha luminosity function, the paper would be substantially strengthened by robustness tests: vary the flux threshold and maximum size over a plausible range and show that the fitted gradients, the LF slope alpha, and L_min change by less than the quoted uncertainties (or quantify the resulting shifts). This is particularly important for the Halpha LF, where the completeness limit is close to the adopted threshold.
  4. [Sec. 2.2] The central measurements are produced by a prototype pipeline whose full description is partly given as 'Sanchez (in prep)' and 'Mejia et al. (in prep)' (Sec. 2.2). Since the paper's purpose includes validating this pipeline on IC 342, please either include the essential algorithm details in an appendix or clearly specify which steps are already described in Sanchez et al. (2025) and Lacerda et al. (2022). As written, a reader cannot reproduce the emission-line fluxes and their uncertainties from the description in this manuscript alone.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 3.3, Fig. 2] The text refers to 'the right panel of Fig.3.3' when describing the color coding by galactocentric distance; this should be Fig. 2.
  2. [Abstract and Sec. 1] The phrase 'one of the closest galaxy to us' is imprecise; at 3.3 Mpc IC 342 is a nearby grand-design spiral, but not among the closest galaxies overall. Please rephrase to 'one of the closest grand-design spirals'.
  3. [Sec. 5] The sentence 'The find that the best-fit values...' contains a typo; it should read 'We find that the best-fit values...'.
  4. [Sec. 4.3 and Sec. 4.4] The text cites 'Fig. 23' both for the spatial residuals of the N/O ratio and for the spatial residuals of the electron density; these are different maps and should have distinct figure numbers.
  5. [Fig. 16] The correlation matrix reports Pearson coefficients without uncertainties or significance levels; adding p-values or confidence intervals would help the reader assess which residual correlations are meaningful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the measurements are fits to data compared with external benchmarks, not predictions reconstructed from the paper's own inputs.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain, the paper's central quantities are measured and then compared with external data, and no load-bearing step defines a target result in terms of itself. The HII-region catalog is produced by pyHIIextractor from the H-alpha map with flux and size thresholds chosen by visual inspection; the resulting 1155 candidates and 960 bona-fide star-forming regions are the data, not the conclusion. The physical properties use external calibrators: AV follows Catalán-Torrecilla et al. (2015), oxygen abundances use Ho (2019), and N/O uses Pilyugin & Grebel (2016). The radial gradients are single-slope least-squares fits to the measured per-region properties, and the H-alpha luminosity function is a maximum-likelihood power-law fit to measured luminosities using the powerlaw package, following Santoro et al. (2022). These fits are not 'predictions' of the paper's own inputs; they are characterizations of the data. The comparison to 7533 MaNGA galaxies in Fig. 18 references Barrera-Ballesteros et al. (2023), which is a separate observational catalog rather than a result derived from IC 342 data; self-citation here is not load-bearing in a circular sense. Likewise, the AMUSING++ and PHANGS-MUSE comparisons are independent samples. The skeptic concern that Fig. 18 mixes HII-region-based gradients from IC 342 with galaxy-wide spaxel/annulus-based MaNGA gradients is a legitimate validity and calibration issue about whether the comparison is apples-to-apples, but it is not a circularity: the IC 342 gradient and the MaNGA gradients are not constructed from each other. No equation in the paper defines a derived quantity in terms of the quantity it is supposed to explain, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The paper is therefore self-contained as an observational study, and the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new free-floating entities; its free parameters are selection thresholds and fitted gradients. It relies on standard astrophysical assumptions about Halpha tracing star formation, the validity of empirical abundance and ionization calibrators, the accuracy of the LVM-DAP prototype, and the adopted distance. These are all standard but not independently validated within this paper.

free parameters (6)
  • Halpha flux threshold = ~5e-18 erg/s/A
    Chosen by visual inspection of the resulting HII region sizes and locations (Sec 3.1); directly sets the number and properties of detected regions.
  • Maximum HII region size = ~2.5 arcsec (fiber size)
    Chosen to avoid spurious large regions (Sec 3.1); affects the size distribution and integrated fluxes.
  • Halpha/Hbeta lower limit for extinction = 2.86
    Applied in Sec 4.1 to select regions for A_V measurement; excludes low-S/N Balmer ratios.
  • Equivalent width threshold for star-forming classification = 14 A
    From Lacerda et al. (2020), used in Sec 3.3 to select bona fide HII regions.
  • Radial gradient slope and zero-point fits = e.g., A_V slope -0.18 mag/kpc, zero point 2.21 mag; O/H slope ~0
    Single-slope least-squares fits to each property vs radius (Sec 4), reported without error bars; these fitted values are the quantitative results.
  • Halpha LF power-law parameters = alpha=1.9±0.1, log(Lmin/erg/s)=37.1±0.1
    Maximum-likelihood fit to the Halpha luminosity distribution (Sec 5), used for comparison with PHANGS-MUSE.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Clumpy Halpha emission traces HII regions ionized by OB stars.
    Standard interpretation from Sec 1 and 3.1; underlies detection and interpretation.
  • domain assumption Empirical abundance and ionization calibrators (Ho 2019, Pilyugin & Grebel 2016, etc.) remain valid at IC 342's metallicity and density.
    Used in Sec 4.2-4.4; any mismatch would shift all derived abundances and the ionization parameter.
  • domain assumption The LVM-DAP measures emission-line fluxes accurately on MaNGA data.
    All measurements depend on this prototype pipeline; details are referenced to Sanchez (in prep) and Mejia et al. (in prep), Sec 2.2.
  • domain assumption Balmer decrement gives extinction with the adopted reddening law.
    Used in Sec 4.1 via Catalan-Torrecilla et al. (2015); standard but model-dependent.
  • domain assumption Distance to IC 342 is 3.3 Mpc.
    Converts angular scales (arcsec) to physical scales (pc) for all radial gradients and luminosity scales.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Physical properties of HII regions at sub-kpc scales using integral field spectroscopy on IC 342." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7ZO7ZFQC

@misc{pith2026250705414,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Physical properties of HII regions at sub-kpc scales using integral field spectroscopy on IC 342},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7ZO7ZFQC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.05414}
}
abstract

In this study we use Integral Field Spectroscopic (IFS) observations for one of the closest galaxy to us, the grand design spiral IC 342, to derive physical properties of HII regions at sub-kpc scales. This IFS data represents, to our knowledge, the most comprehensive observational effort in the optical for this galaxy. The final IFS datacube consists of 349 individual pointings using the IFS instrumentation from the SDSS-IV MaNGA survey. Using a prototype of the data analysis pipeline that will be devoted to the SDSS-V Local Volume Mapper (LVM) survey, we measure different observables from the emission line in the optical. In particular, using the flux map of the H$\alpha$ emission line, we derive the location and sizes of H ii region candidates for IC 342. Using the integrated flux for different emission lines within each region, we derived the radial distribution of different physical properties from the ionized gas (e.g., optical extinction, H$\alpha$ luminosity, oxygen abundance, etc). Comparing with larger samples of galaxies with IFS data, our results suggest that physical properties of the ionized gas of IC 342 are similar to galaxies with similar stellar mass in the nearby universe.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.05414 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flux of the Hα emission line from H ii candidates detected by pyHIIextractor overplotted over the Hα emission line map derived using the DRP-LVM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. H ii candidates in the BPT diagram. Left: Candidates color codded by their Hα equivalent wdith. Right: Candidates color codded by their galactocentric distance. The dots represents the properties from the AMUSING++ sample. In both panels, the solid and dashed lines represent the Kauffman and Kewley demarcation lines. We use this demarcations lines and the Hα equivalent width to select bona fide star-forming regions … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Fig.3.3 we color code the candidate according to their [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (19 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Radial distribution of the optical extinction, Av, derived [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Radial distribution of the Hα luminosity. Colors of the symbols and lines are similar as those derived in Fig.4. other hand, we find that most of non star-forming regions have a deficit in their EW(Hα) in comparison to the de￾rived gradient and are distributed in the c…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Nitrogen-to-oxygen ratio against the oxygen abundance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Best-fit parameters for the radial gradient of oxygen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Radial distribution of the N/O ratio for star-forming regions.As for the oxygen abundance, the black line represent the best fit for this radial distribution. 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 12 + log(O/H) −4 −3 −2 −1 0 log(N /O) d/kpc 2.5 5.0 7.5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Similar to Fig.8, radial distribution of the electronic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Similar to Fig.8, radial distribution of the ionization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Comparison between the ionization parameter and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Radial distribution of the systemic velocity and the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Probability distribution function of the H [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Comparison between the best fit parameters derived [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Correlation matrix comparing the radial residuals of the di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Comparison of the Hα velocity dispersion of the H ii regions with the residuals from the different physical properties derived from the ionized gas presented in this study. to dynamically cold ones. 7. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS In this article we explore the physical…
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Comparison of the gradient (left-panel) and zero-point (right-panel) of the best of the radial distribution of the oxygen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_18.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Maps of the flux from the four brightest emission lines [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_19.png]
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Similar to Fig. 1, with the H [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_20.png]
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Similar to Fig. 1, with the H [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_21.png]
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Similar to Fig. 1, with the H [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_22.png]
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: Similar to Fig. 1, with the H [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_23.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    2014, PLoS ONE, 9, e85777

    Alstott , J., Bullmore , E., & Plenz , D. 2014, PLoS ONE, 9, e85777

    2014

  4. [4]

    Anderson , L. D. 2014, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 223, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts \#223, 312.01

    2014

  5. [5]

    M., Sip H o cz , B

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip H o cz , B. M., G "u nther , H. M., Lim , P. L., Crawford , S. M., Conseil , S., Shupe , D. L., Craig , M. W., Dencheva , N., Ginsburg , A., Vand erPlas , J. T., Bradley , L. D., P 'e rez-Su 'a rez , D., de Val-Borro , M., Aldcroft , T. L., Cruz , K. L., Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., Ardelean , C.,...

    2018

  6. [6]

    P., Tollerud , E

    Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., Greenfield , P., Droettboom , M., Bray , E., Aldcroft , T., Davis , M., Ginsburg , A., Price-Whelan , A. M., Kerzendorf , W. E., Conley , A., Crighton , N., Barbary , K., Muna , D., Ferguson , H., Grollier , F., Parikh , M. M., Nair , P. H., Unther , H. M., Deil , C., Woillez , J., Conseil , S....

    2013

  7. [7]

    A., Phillips , M

    Baldwin , J. A., Phillips , M. M., & Terlevich , R. 1981, , 93, 5

    1981

  8. [8]

    T., Glover , S

    Barnes , A. T., Glover , S. C. O., Kreckel , K., Ostriker , E. C., Bigiel , F., Belfiore , F., Be s li \'c , I., Blanc , G. A., Chevance , M., Dale , D. A., Egorov , O., Eibensteiner , C., Emsellem , E., Grasha , K., Groves , B. A., Klessen , R. S., Kruijssen , J. M. D., Leroy , A. K., Longmore , S. N., Lopez , L., McElroy , R., Meidt , S. E., Murphy , E....

    2021

Show all 89 references
  1. [9]

    K., S \'a nchez , S

    Barrera-Ballesteros , J. K., S \'a nchez , S. F., Espinosa-Ponce , C., L \'o pez-Cob \'a , C., Carigi , L., Lugo-Aranda , A. Z., Lacerda , E., Bruzual , G., Hernandez-Toledo , H., Boardman , N., Drory , N., Lane , R. R., & Brownstein , J. R. 2023, , 59, 213

    2023

  2. [10]

    K., S \'a nchez , S

    Barrera-Ballesteros , J. K., S \'a nchez , S. F., Heckman , T., Wong , T., Bolatto , A., Ostriker , E., Rosolowsky , E., Carigi , L., Vogel , S., Levy , R. C., Colombo , D., Luo , Y., & Cao , Y. 2021, , 503, 3643

    2021

  3. [11]

    K., Utomo , D., Bolatto , A

    Barrera-Ballesteros , J. K., Utomo , D., Bolatto , A. D., S \'a nchez , S. F., Vogel , S. N., Wong , T., Levy , R. C., Colombo , D., Kalinova , V., Teuben , P., Garc \' a-Benito , R., Husemann , B., Mast , D., & Blitz , L. 2020, , 492, 2651

    2020

  4. [12]

    F., Bundy , K., Bershady , M., Westfall , K., Lin , L., Drory , N., Boquien , M., Thomas , D., & Brinkmann , J

    Belfiore , F., Maiolino , R., Tremonti , C., S \'a nchez , S. F., Bundy , K., Bershady , M., Westfall , K., Lin , L., Drory , N., Boquien , M., Thomas , D., & Brinkmann , J. 2017, , 469, 151

    2017

  5. [13]

    Bigiel , F., Leroy , A., Walter , F., Brinks , E., de Blok , W. J. G., Madore , B., & Thornley , M. D. 2008, , 136, 2846

    2008

  6. [14]

    R., Bershady , M

    Blanton , M. R., Bershady , M. A., Abolfathi , B., Albareti , F. D., Allende Prieto , C., Almeida , A., Alonso-Garc \' a , J., Anders , F., Anderson , S. F., Andrews , B., Aquino-Ort \' z , E., Arag \'o n-Salamanca , A., Argudo-Fern \'a ndez , M., Armengaud , E., Aubourg , E.,...

    2017

  7. [15]

    R., Knapen , J

    Bradley , T. R., Knapen , J. H., Beckman , J. E., & Folkes , S. L. 2006, , 459, L13

    2006

  8. [16]

    A., Law , D

    Bundy , K., Bershady , M. A., Law , D. R., Yan , R., Drory , N., MacDonald , N., Wake , D. A., Cherinka , B., S \'a nchez-Gallego , J. R., Weijmans , A.-M., Thomas , D., Tremonti , C., Masters , K., Coccato , L., Diamond-Stanic , A. M., Arag \'o n-Salamanca , A., Avila-Reese ,...

    2015

  9. [17]

    F., Kennicutt , R

    Catal \'a n-Torrecilla , C., Gil de Paz , A., Castillo-Morales , A., Iglesias-P \'a ramo , J., S \'a nchez , S. F., Kennicutt , R. C., P \'e rez-Gonz \'a lez , P. G., Marino , R. A., Walcher , C. J., Husemann , B., Garc \' a-Benito , R., Mast , D., Gonz \'a lez Delgado , R. M....

    2015

  10. [18]

    2011, , 413, 1687

    Cid Fernandes , R., Stasi \'n ska , G., Mateus , A., & Vale Asari , N. 2011, , 413, 1687

    2011

  11. [19]

    S., Mateus , A., Vale Asari , N., Schoenell , W., & Sodr \'e , L

    Cid Fernandes , R., Stasi \'n ska , G., Schlickmann , M. S., Mateus , A., Vale Asari , N., Schoenell , W., & Sodr \'e , L. 2010, , 403, 1036

    2010

  12. [20]

    R., & Newman , M

    Clauset , A., Shalizi , C. R., & Newman , M. E. J. 2009, SIAM Review, 51, 661

    2009

  13. [21]

    M., Lawrence , J

    Croom , S. M., Lawrence , J. S., Bland-Hawthorn , J., Bryant , J. J., Fogarty , L., Richards , S., Goodwin , M., Farrell , T., Miziarski , S., Heald , R., Jones , D. H., Lee , S., Colless , M., Brough , S., Hopkins , A. M., Bauer , A. E., Birchall , M. N., Ellis , S., Horton ,...

    2012

  14. [22]

    P., Turner , J

    Crosthwaite , L. P., Turner , J. L., & Ho , P. T. P. 2000, , 119, 1720

    2000

  15. [23]

    J., Poetrodjojo , H., Ho , I

    D'Agostino , J. J., Poetrodjojo , H., Ho , I. T., Groves , B., Kewley , L., Madore , B. F., Rich , J., & Seibert , M. 2018, , 479, 4907

    2018

  16. [24]

    P., McLeod , A

    Della Bruna , L., Adamo , A., Amram , P., Rosolowsky , E., Usher , C., Sirressi , M., Schruba , A., Emsellem , E., Leroy , A., Bik , A., Blair , W. P., McLeod , A. F., \"O stlin , G., Renaud , F., Robert , C., Rousseau-Nepton , L., & Smith , L. J. 2022, , 660, A77

    2022

  17. [25]

    J., Thilker , D., & Wofford , A

    Della Bruna , L., Adamo , A., Bik , A., Fumagalli , M., Walterbos , R., \"O stlin , G., Bruzual , G., Calzetti , D., Charlot , S., Grasha , K., Smith , L. J., Thilker , D., & Wofford , A. 2020, , 635, A134

    2020

  18. [26]

    C., Smith , L

    Della Bruna , L., Adamo , A., Lee , J. C., Smith , L. J., Krumholz , M., Bik , A., Calzetti , D., Fox , A., Fumagalli , M., Grasha , K., Messa , M., \"O stlin , G., Walterbos , R., & Wofford , A. 2021, , 650, A103

    2021

  19. [27]

    Dopita , M. A. & Evans , I. N. 1986, , 307, 431

    1986

  20. [28]

    Dottori , H. A. & Copetti , M. V. F. 1989, , 18, 115

    1989

  21. [29]

    A., Kreckel , K., Sanchez , S

    Drory , N., Blanc , G. A., Kreckel , K., Sanchez , S. F., Mejia-Narvaez , A., Johnston , E. J., Jones , A. M., Pellegrini , E. W., Konidaris , N. P., Herbst , T., Sanchez-Gallego , J., Kollmeier , J. A., de Almeida , F., Barrera-Ballesteros , J. K., Bizyaev , D., Brownstein , ...

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    A., Bundy , K., Gunn , J., Law , D

    Drory , N., MacDonald , N., Bershady , M. A., Bundy , K., Gunn , J., Law , D. R., Smith , M., Stoll , R., Tremonti , C. A., Wake , D. A., Yan , R., Weijmans , A. M., Byler , N., Cherinka , B., Cope , F., Eigenbrot , A., Harding , P., Holder , D., Huehnerhoff , J., Jaehnig , K....

    2015

  23. [31]

    A., Congiu , E., Groves , B., Ho , I

    Emsellem , E., Schinnerer , E., Santoro , F., Belfiore , F., Pessa , I., McElroy , R., Blanc , G. A., Congiu , E., Groves , B., Ho , I. T., Kreckel , K., Razza , A., Sanchez-Blazquez , P., Egorov , O., Faesi , C., Klessen , R. S., Leroy , A. K., Meidt , S., Querejeta , M., Ros...

    2022

  24. [32]

    F., Morisset , C., Barrera-Ballesteros , J

    Espinosa-Ponce , C., S \'a nchez , S. F., Morisset , C., Barrera-Ballesteros , J. K., Galbany , L., Garc \' a-Benito , R., Lacerda , E. A. D., & Mast , D. 2022,

    2022

  25. [33]

    u hler , T., S \'a nchez , S. F., Falc \'o n-Barroso , J., P \'e rez , E., Maureira , J. C., Hamuy , M., Gonz \'a lez-Gait \'a n , S., F \

    Galbany , L., Anderson , J. P., Rosales-Ortega , F. F., Kuncarayakti , H., Kr \"u hler , T., S \'a nchez , S. F., Falc \'o n-Barroso , J., P \'e rez , E., Maureira , J. C., Hamuy , M., Gonz \'a lez-Gait \'a n , S., F \"o rster , F., & Moral , V. 2016, , 455, 4087

    2016

  26. [34]

    P., S \'a nchez , S

    Galbany , L., Anderson , J. P., S \'a nchez , S. F., Kunkarayakti , H., Lyman , J., Kruehler , T., Aquino , E., Afonso , A. S., Ascasibar , Y., Ashall , C., Badenes , C., Burns , C., Dessart , L., Dominguez , I., Dong , S., Falc \'o n-Barroso , J., F \"o rster , F., Gonz \'a l...

    2020

  27. [35]

    I., Ma \' z Apell \'a niz , J., & Cervi \ n o , M

    Garc \' a-Benito , R., P \'e rez , E., D \' az , \'A . I., Ma \' z Apell \'a niz , J., & Cervi \ n o , M. 2011, , 141, 126

    2011

  28. [36]

    Gonz \'a lez Delgado , R. M. & P \'e rez , E. 1997, , 108, 199

    1997

  29. [37]

    H., Battisti , A

    Grasha , K., Chen , Q. H., Battisti , A. J., Acharyya , A., Ridolfo , S., Poehler , E., Mably , S., Verma , A. A., Hayward , K. L., Kharbanda , A., Poetrodjojo , H., Seibert , M., Rich , J. A., Madore , B. F., & Kewley , L. J. 2022, , 929, 118

    2022

  30. [38]

    V., Emsellem , E., Grasha , K., Leroy , A., Scheuermann , F., Schinnerer , E., Watkins , E

    Groves , B., Kreckel , K., Santoro , F., Belfiore , F., Zavodnik , E., Congiu , E., Egorov , O. V., Emsellem , E., Grasha , K., Leroy , A., Scheuermann , F., Schinnerer , E., Watkins , E. J., Barnes , A. T., Bigiel , F., Dale , D. A., Glover , S. C. O., Pessa , I., Sanchez-Bla...

    2023

  31. [39]

    E., Siegmund , W

    Gunn , J. E., Siegmund , W. A., Mannery , E. J., Owen , R. E., Hull , C. L., Leger , R. F., Carey , L. N., Knapp , G. R., York , D. G., Boroski , W. N., Kent , S. M., Lupton , R. H., Rockosi , C. M., Evans , M. L., Waddell , P., Anderson , J. E., Annis , J., Barentine , J. C.,...

    2006

  32. [40]

    2005, , 360, 1201

    Hernandez , O., Carignan , C., Amram , P., Chemin , L., & Daigle , O. 2005, , 360, 1201

    2005

  33. [41]

    Ho , I. T. 2019, , 485, 3569

    2019

  34. [42]

    Hodge , P. W. & Kennicutt , R. C., J. 1983, , 267, 563

    1983

  35. [43]

    K., & Morita , K.-I

    Ishizuki , S., Kawabe , R., Ishiguro , M., Okumura , S. K., & Morita , K.-I. 1990, , 344, 224

    1990

  36. [44]

    H., Masci , F., Tsai , C

    Jarrett , T. H., Masci , F., Tsai , C. W., Petty , S., Cluver , M. E., Assef , R. J., Benford , D., Blain , A., Bridge , C., Donoso , E., Eisenhardt , P., Koribalski , B., Lake , S., Neill , J. D., Seibert , M., Sheth , K., Stanford , S., & Wright , E. 2013, , 145, 6

    2013

  37. [45]

    & Yan , R

    Ji , X. & Yan , R. 2022, , 659, A112

    2022

  38. [46]

    M., White , S

    Kauffmann , G., Heckman , T. M., White , S. D. M., Charlot , S., Tremonti , C., Peng , E. W., Seibert , M., Brinkmann , J., Nichol , R. C., SubbaRao , M., & York , D. 2003, , 341, 54

    2003

  39. [47]

    C., Calzetti , D., Aniano , G., Appleton , P., Armus , L., Beir \ a o , P., Bolatto , A

    Kennicutt , R. C., Calzetti , D., Aniano , G., Appleton , P., Armus , L., Beir \ a o , P., Bolatto , A. D., Brandl , B., Crocker , A., Croxall , K., Dale , D. A., Donovan Meyer , J., Draine , B. T., Engelbracht , C. W., Galametz , M., Gordon , K. D., Groves , B., Hao , C. N., ...

    2011

  40. [48]

    Kennicutt , R. C. & Evans , N. J. 2012, , 50, 531

    2012

  41. [49]

    J., Dopita , M

    Kewley , L. J., Dopita , M. A., Sutherland , R. S., Heisler , C. A., & Trevena , J. 2001, , 556, 121

    2001

  42. [50]

    Knapen , J. H. 1998, , 297, 255

    1998

  43. [51]

    H., Stedman , S., Bramich , D

    Knapen , J. H., Stedman , S., Bramich , D. M., Folkes , S. L., & Bradley , T. R. 2004, , 426, 1135

    2004

  44. [52]

    A., Zasowski , G., Rix , H.-W., Johns , M., Anderson , S

    Kollmeier , J. A., Zasowski , G., Rix , H.-W., Johns , M., Anderson , S. F., Drory , N., Johnson , J. A., Pogge , R. W., Bird , J. C., Blanc , G. A., Brownstein , J. R., Crane , J. D., De Lee , N. M., Klaene , M. A., Kreckel , K., MacDonald , N., Merloni , A., Ness , M. K., O'...

    2017 arXiv

  45. [53]

    P., Drory , N., Froning , C

    Konidaris , N. P., Drory , N., Froning , C. S., Hebert , A., Bilgi , P., Blanc , G. A., Lanz , A. E., Hull , C. L., Kollmeier , J. A., Ramirez , S., Wachter , S., Kreckel , K., Pak , S., Pellegrini , E., Almeida , A., Case , S., Zhelem , R., Feger , T., Lawrence , J., Lesser ,...

  46. [54]

    T., Blanc , G

    Kreckel , K., Ho , I. T., Blanc , G. A., Groves , B., Santoro , F., Schinnerer , E., Bigiel , F., Chevance , M., Congiu , E., Emsellem , E., Faesi , C., Glover , S. C. O., Grasha , K., Kruijssen , J. M. D., Lang , P., Leroy , A. K., Meidt , S. E., McElroy , R., Pety , J., Roso...

    2019

  47. [55]

    2007, , 59, 117

    Kuno , N., Sato , N., Nakanishi , H., Hirota , A., Tosaki , T., Shioya , Y., Sorai , K., Nakai , N., Nishiyama , K., & Vila-Vilar \'o , B. 2007, , 59, 117

    2007

  48. [56]

    Lacerda , E. A. D., Cid Fernandes , R., Couto , G. S., Stasi \'n ska , G., Garc \' a-Benito , R., Vale Asari , N., P \'e rez , E., Gonz \'a lez Delgado , R. M., S \'a nchez , S. F., & de Amorim , A. L. 2018, , 474, 3727

    2018

  49. [57]

    Lacerda , E. A. D., S \'a nchez , S. F., Cid Fernandes , R., L \'o pez-Cob \'a , C., Espinosa-Ponce , C., & Galbany , L. 2020, , 492, 3073

    2020

  50. [58]

    Lacerda , E. A. D., S \'a nchez , S. F., Mej \' a-Narv \'a ez , A., Camps-Fari \ n a , A., Espinosa-Ponce , C., Barrera-Ballesteros , J. K., Ibarra-Medel , H., & Lugo-Aranda , A. Z. 2022, , 97, 101895

    2022

  51. [59]

    R., Cherinka , B., Yan , R., Andrews , B

    Law , D. R., Cherinka , B., Yan , R., Andrews , B. H., Bershady , M. A., Bizyaev , D., Blanc , G. A., Blanton , M. R., Bolton , A. S., Brownstein , J. R., Bundy , K., Chen , Y., Drory , N., D'Souza , R., Fu , H., Jones , A., Kauffmann , G., MacDonald , N., Masters , K. L., New...

    2016

  52. [60]

    F., Anderson , J

    L \'o pez-Cob \'a , C., S \'a nchez , S. F., Anderson , J. P., Cruz-Gonz \'a lez , I., Galbany , L., Ruiz-Lara , T., Barrera-Ballesteros , J. K., Prieto , J. L., & Kuncarayakti , H. 2020, , 159, 167

    2020

  53. [61]

    F., Moiseev , A

    L \'o pez-Cob \'a , C., S \'a nchez , S. F., Moiseev , A. V., Oparin , D. V., Bitsakis , T., Cruz-Gonz \'a lez , I., Morisset , C., Galbany , L., Bland-Hawthorn , J., Roth , M. M., Dettmar , R. J., Bomans , D. J., Gonz \'a lez Delgado , R. M., Cano-D \' az , M., Marino , R. A....

    2017

  54. [62]

    Z., S \'a nchez , S

    Lugo-Aranda , A. Z., S \'a nchez , S. F., Barrera-Ballesteros , J. K., L \'o pez-Cob \'a , C., Espinosa-Ponce , C., Galbany , L., & Anderson , J. P. 2024, , 528, 6099

    2024

  55. [63]

    Z., S \'a nchez , S

    Lugo-Aranda , A. Z., S \'a nchez , S. F., Espinosa-Ponce , C., L \'o pez-Cob \'a , C., Galbany , L., Barrera-Ballesteros , J. K., S \'a nchez-Menguiano , L., & Anderson , J. P. 2022, RAS Techniques and Instruments, 1, 3

    2022

  56. [64]

    L., Rybski , P

    McCall , M. L., Rybski , P. M., & Shields , G. A. 1985, , 57, 1

    1985

  57. [65]

    F., Ali , A

    McLeod , A. F., Ali , A. A., Chevance , M., Della Bruna , L., Schruba , A., Stevance , H. F., Adamo , A., Kruijssen , J. M. D., Longmore , S. N., Weisz , D. R., & Zeidler , P. 2021, , 508, 5425

    2021

  58. [66]

    F., Dale , J

    McLeod , A. F., Dale , J. E., Evans , C. J., Ginsburg , A., Kruijssen , J. M. D., Pellegrini , E. W., Ramsay , S. K., & Testi , L. 2019, , 486, 5263

    2019

  59. [67]

    F., Kruijssen , J

    McLeod , A. F., Kruijssen , J. M. D., Weisz , D. R., Zeidler , P., Schruba , A., Dalcanton , J. J., Longmore , S. N., Chevance , M., Faesi , C. M., & Byler , N. 2020, , 891, 25

    2020

  60. [68]

    Pilyugin , L. S. & Grebel , E. K. 2016, , 457, 3678

    2016

  61. [69]

    S., V \' lchez , J

    Pilyugin , L. S., V \' lchez , J. M., & Contini , T. 2004, , 425, 849

    2004

  62. [70]

    Rickard , L. J. & Palmer , P. 1981, , 102, L13

    1981

  63. [71]

    Rousseau-Nepton , L., Martin , R. P., Robert , C., Drissen , L., Amram , P., Prunet , S., Martin , T., Moumen , I., Adamo , A., Alarie , A., Barmby , P., Boselli , A., Bresolin , F., Bureau , M., Chemin , L., Fernandes , R. C., Combes , F., Crowder , C., Della Bruna , L., Duar...

    2019

  64. [72]

    Saha , A., Claver , J., & Hoessel , J. G. 2002, , 124, 839

    2002

  65. [73]

    in prep, LVM Data Analysis Pipeline

    Sanchez , S. in prep, LVM Data Analysis Pipeline

  66. [74]

    F., Kennicutt , R

    S \'a nchez , S. F., Kennicutt , R. C., Gil de Paz , A., van de Ven , G., V \' lchez , J. M., Wisotzki , L., Walcher , C. J., Mast , D., Aguerri , J. A. L., Albiol-P \'e rez , S., Alonso-Herrero , A., Alves , J., Bakos , J., Bart \'a kov \'a , T., Bland-Hawthorn , J., Boselli ...

    2012

  67. [75]

    F., Mej \' a-Narv \'a ez , A., Egorov , O

    S \'a nchez , S. F., Mej \' a-Narv \'a ez , A., Egorov , O. V., Kreckel , K., Drory , N., Blanc , G. A., M \'e ndez-Delgado , J. E., Barrera-Ballesteros , J. K., Ibarra-Medel , H., Bizyaev , D., Garc \' a , P., Wofford , A., & Lugo-Aranda , A. Z. 2025, , 169, 52

    2025

  68. [76]

    F., P \'e rez , E., Rosales-Ortega , F

    S \'a nchez , S. F., P \'e rez , E., Rosales-Ortega , F. F., Miralles-Caballero , D., L \'o pez-S \'a nchez , A. R., Iglesias-P \'a ramo , J., Marino , R. A., S \'a nchez-Menguiano , L., Garc \' a-Benito , R., Mast , D., Mendoza , M. A., Papaderos , P., Ellis , S., Galbany , L...

    2015

  69. [77]

    F., P \'e rez , E., S \'a nchez-Bl \'a zquez , P., Garc \' a-Benito , R., Ibarra-Mede , H

    S \'a nchez , S. F., P \'e rez , E., S \'a nchez-Bl \'a zquez , P., Garc \' a-Benito , R., Ibarra-Mede , H. J., Gonz \'a lez , J. J., Rosales-Ortega , F. F., S \'a nchez-Menguiano , L., Ascasibar , Y., Bitsakis , T., Law , D., Cano-D \' az , M., L \'o pez-Cob \'a , C., Marino ...

    2016

  70. [78]

    F., P \'e rez , E., S \'a nchez-Bl \'a zquez , P., Gonz \'a lez , J

    S \'a nchez , S. F., P \'e rez , E., S \'a nchez-Bl \'a zquez , P., Gonz \'a lez , J. J., Rosales-Ortega , F. F., Cano-D \' az , M., L \'o pez-Cob \'a , C., Marino , R. A., Gil de Paz , A., Moll \'a , M., L \'o pez-S \'a nchez , A. R., Ascasibar , Y., & Barrera-Ballesteros , J...

    2015

  71. [79]

    F., P \'e rez , I., Ruiz-Lara , T., Galbany , L., Anderson , J

    S \'a nchez-Menguiano , L., S \'a nchez , S. F., P \'e rez , I., Ruiz-Lara , T., Galbany , L., Anderson , J. P., Kr \"u hler , T., Kuncarayakti , H., & Lyman , J. D. 2018, , 609, A119

    2018

  72. [80]

    A., Blanc , G

    Santoro , F., Kreckel , K., Belfiore , F., Groves , B., Congiu , E., Thilker , D. A., Blanc , G. A., Schinnerer , E., Ho , I. T., Kruijssen , J. M. D., Meidt , S., Klessen , R. S., Schruba , A., Querejeta , M., Pessa , I., Chevance , M., Kim , J., Emsellem , E., McElroy , R., ...

    2022

  73. [81]

    Schlafly , E. F. & Finkbeiner , D. P. 2011, , 737, 103

    2011

  74. [82]

    A., Gunn , J

    Smee , S. A., Gunn , J. E., Uomoto , A., Roe , N., Schlegel , D., Rockosi , C. M., Carr , M. A., Leger , F., Dawson , K. S., Olmstead , M. D., Brinkmann , J., Owen , R., Barkhouser , R. H., Honscheid , K., Harding , P., Long , D., Lupton , R. H., Loomis , C., Anderson , L., An...

    2013

  75. [83]

    Tully , R. B. 1988, Journal of the British Astronomical Association, 98, 316

    1988

  76. [84]

    P., & Amram , P

    Vicens-Mouret , S., Drissen , L., Robert , C., Rousseau-Nepton , L., Martin , R. P., & Amram , P. 2023, , 524, 3623

    2023

  77. [85]

    A., Law , D

    Yan , R., Tremonti , C., Bershady , M. A., Law , D. R., Schlegel , D. J., Bundy , K., Drory , N., MacDonald , N., Bizyaev , D., Blanc , G. A., Blanton , M. R., Cherinka , B., Eigenbrot , A., Gunn , J. E., Harding , P., Hogg , D. W., S \'a nchez-Gallego , J. R., S \'a nchez , S...

    2016

  78. [86]

    2010, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 10, 329

    Zhu , Y.-N., Wu , H., Li , H.-N., & Cao , C. 2010, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 10, 329

    2010

  79. [87]

    2009, , 400, 1181

    Zibetti , S., Charlot , S., & Rix , H.-W. 2009, , 400, 1181

    2009

  80. [88]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year url adsnote label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence afte...

  81. [89]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.