pith. sign in

arxiv: 2507.13436 · v2 · submitted 2025-07-17 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · physics.plasm-ph

The role of three-dimensional effects on ion injection and acceleration in perpendicular shocks

Luca Orusa , Damiano Caprioli , Lorenzo Sironi , Anatoly Spitkovsky This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 04:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE physics.plasm-ph
keywords perpendicular shocksion injectionparticle accelerationhybrid simulationsmagnetic turbulenceshock drift accelerationcosmic rays
0
0 comments X

The pith

Ion injection at perpendicular shocks depends on the porosity of downstream magnetic turbulence, which only appears in three dimensions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses 2D and 3D hybrid simulations of non-relativistic perpendicular shocks to examine why ions reach high energies only in three dimensions. It finds that particles must return upstream from the downstream region to gain energy through shock drift acceleration, but this return is blocked unless the magnetic turbulence there is porous enough to let ions pass without being trapped. Two-dimensional models produce a different turbulence structure that traps ions, so they miss the injection process. Resolving turbulence on scales smaller than the thermal ion gyroradius is also required. These results matter for understanding the origin of cosmic rays at astrophysical shocks.

Core claim

In 3D hybrid simulations with kinetic ions and fluid electrons, efficient ion injection occurs because the magnetic turbulence in the downstream region near the shock is porous: it allows particles to traverse the region and return upstream without being trapped. This porosity is absent or ineffective in 2D runs, where ions remain trapped. The difference arises from the three-dimensional structure of the turbulence. In addition, small-scale fluctuations below the thermal ion gyroradius must be resolved for injection to be modeled correctly.

What carries the argument

The porosity of the magnetic turbulence, the property describing how easily the post-shock region allows particles to traverse it and return upstream without being trapped.

If this is right

  • Particle acceleration at perpendicular shocks cannot be modeled accurately without three-dimensional simulations that capture the correct turbulence geometry.
  • Resolving magnetic fluctuations on scales smaller than the thermal ion gyroradius is required to obtain realistic injection rates.
  • Shock-drift acceleration becomes efficient only when the downstream turbulence permits repeated upstream returns.
  • Previous two-dimensional studies likely underestimated the fraction of ions that can be injected into the acceleration process.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This porosity mechanism may explain why some observed shocks accelerate particles more efficiently than others even at similar Mach numbers.
  • Extending the simulations to include kinetic electrons could test whether the porosity threshold for injection changes when electron-scale physics is retained.
  • The results suggest that cosmic-ray spectra inferred from two-dimensional models may need revision once three-dimensional effects are included.

Load-bearing premise

The hybrid treatment of kinetic ions and fluid electrons together with the chosen numerical resolution is enough to reveal a genuine physical difference in turbulence porosity rather than a numerical artifact.

What would settle it

A higher-resolution 3D simulation or a fully kinetic electron run that shows comparable ion injection rates in 2D and 3D would falsify the claim that porosity is the essential three-dimensional effect.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.13436 by Anatoly Spitkovsky, Damiano Caprioli, Lorenzo Sironi, Luca Orusa.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Downstream ion energy spectra from various sim￾ulations. The top panel shows the spectra for MA = 100 in both 2D and 3D, comparing two resolutions (∆x = 0.4 and 0.1 di) at t = 32 ω −1 c . The bottom panel displays spectra for MA = 30, 60, and 100, all with a resolution of ∆x = 0.1 di at t = 32 ω −1 c . computational point of view in 3D, since it constrains also the time resolution: eventually the computati… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Trajectories in the x − y plane (top) and x − z plane (bottom) of one representative particle per simula￾tion—both 2D (dashed) and 3D (solid), at high and low resolution of MA = 30 shock—that exhibit similar behav￾ior in the initial stages of their evolution (see the text for details). first SDA cycle. After this stage their evolutions be￾gin to diverge. Once they penetrate in the downstream, [PITH_FULL_I… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The average penetration depths of ions with en￾ergy E = 7.5Esh are shown for MA = 30 (red lines) and 100 (black lines) in units of r ∗ L = rL(7.5Esh) (see the text for details). These represent the distances traveled downstream where px changes sign. They are reported for 2D and 3D simulations at low and high resolutions. The hatched bands mark the 2σ intervals of the penetration distance distribu￾tions. T… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Percentage of particles with energy E = 7.5Esh that, starting from various initial positions behind the shock, expressed in units of r ∗ L = rL(7.5 Esh), are able to return to the upstream and reach a distance in front of the shock of r ∗ L/4. This is presented for 2D and 3D simulations at both high (left panel) and low (right panel) resolutions. The initial particle momentum is either along z or includes … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Spatial distribution (white contours) in the y–z plane of test particles from our horizon exercise (based on the setup used for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Filling factor F(x, y, z) distribution obtained for 2D (top row) and 3D (bottom row) at MA = 30 high (left) and low resolution (right) as a function of the downstream distance from the shock. F(x, y, z) is computed at each y–z coordinate for different x from the shock. From this sample, the whole distribution is obtained. A small value of F implies the presence of regions of weak B⊥/B0. The comparison clea… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: We report the B⊥ profiles for low- and high-resolution simulations with MA = 30, comparing 2D (top panel), a slice in the x–y plane run of the 3D run (middle panel) and a slice in the x–z plane of the 3D run (bottom panel) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Understanding the conditions that enable particle acceleration at non-relativistic collisionless shocks is essential to unveil the origin of cosmic rays. We employ 2D and 3D hybrid simulations (with kinetic ions and fluid electrons) to explore particle acceleration and magnetic field amplification in non-relativistic perpendicular shocks, focusing on the role of shock drift acceleration and its dependence on the shock Mach number. We perform an analysis of the ion injection process and demonstrate why efficient acceleration is only observed in 3D. In particular, we show that ion injection critically depends on the "porosity" of the magnetic turbulence in the downstream region near the shock, a property describing how easily the post-shock region allows particles to traverse it and return upstream without being trapped. This effect can only be properly captured in 3D. Additionally, we explore the impact of numerical resolution on ion energization, highlighting how resolving small-scale turbulence -- on scales below the thermal ion gyroradius -- is essential for accurately modeling particle injection. Overall, our results emphasize the necessity of high-resolution 3D simulations to capture the fundamental microphysics driving particle acceleration at perpendicular shocks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports 2D and 3D hybrid (kinetic ions, fluid electrons) simulations of non-relativistic perpendicular shocks. It claims that efficient ion injection and acceleration occur only in 3D because the downstream magnetic turbulence possesses a 'porosity' that permits particles to traverse the post-shock region and return upstream for further acceleration via shock drift acceleration; this geometric property is said to be absent or ineffective in 2D. The work also presents a resolution study concluding that scales below the thermal ion gyroradius must be resolved to capture injection correctly.

Significance. If the central interpretation holds, the results would establish that three-dimensional geometry is required to model the microphysics of ion injection at perpendicular shocks, with direct implications for cosmic-ray acceleration models. The manuscript earns credit for its direct numerical experiments comparing 2D and 3D runs and for explicitly demonstrating the necessity of sub-ion-gyroradius resolution.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.3] §4.3 (ion injection analysis): The porosity is introduced as the key physical property controlling return probability, yet it is defined only qualitatively ('how easily the post-shock region allows particles to traverse it') with no explicit metric, formula, or statistic (e.g., return probability per unit time, effective mean free path, or filling factor) computed from the particle trajectories or field data; without such a measure the claim that the effect 'can only be properly captured in 3D' remains difficult to quantify or falsify.
  2. [§5] §5 (resolution study): The paper shows that injection efficiency rises when scales below the ion gyroradius are resolved, but reports no error bars on injection fractions, no convergence test at still higher resolution, and no direct comparison against analytic shock-drift-acceleration expectations; this leaves the robustness of the reported 2D/3D contrast uncertain and weakens the assertion that the difference is physical rather than numerical.
  3. [§3.1] §3.1 (hybrid setup): The hybrid approximation with fluid electrons is adopted without reported sensitivity tests to explicit resistivity, artificial viscosity, or out-of-plane dissipation; because these numerical ingredients couple differently to dimensionality, the observed 2D/3D injection disparity could arise from dimensionality-dependent grid-scale damping rather than from the geometric porosity of 3D turbulence.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Figure 3] Figure 3: The color bar for |B| fluctuations is not labeled with physical units or normalized values, complicating direct visual comparison of turbulence amplitude between 2D and 3D panels.
  2. [Notation] Notation: The shock Mach number is introduced as M but its precise definition (Alfvénic or sonic) is not restated when results are discussed, and the distinction between upstream and downstream values is occasionally ambiguous.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract: The term 'porosity' appears in quotation marks without a one-sentence operational definition, which would aid readers who encounter the manuscript before the methods section.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments, which have identified important areas for clarification and strengthening of the analysis. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating where revisions will be made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4.3] §4.3 (ion injection analysis): The porosity is introduced as the key physical property controlling return probability, yet it is defined only qualitatively ('how easily the post-shock region allows particles to traverse it') with no explicit metric, formula, or statistic (e.g., return probability per unit time, effective mean free path, or filling factor) computed from the particle trajectories or field data; without such a measure the claim that the effect 'can only be properly captured in 3D' remains difficult to quantify or falsify.

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative metric would make the porosity argument more rigorous and falsifiable. In the revised manuscript we will introduce and compute an explicit porosity statistic: the fraction of test particles initialized immediately downstream that successfully return upstream within one ion gyroperiod, averaged over large ensembles of trajectories. This return probability will be reported separately for the 2D and 3D runs and directly compared, thereby quantifying the geometric difference that arises only in three dimensions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5] §5 (resolution study): The paper shows that injection efficiency rises when scales below the ion gyroradius are resolved, but reports no error bars on injection fractions, no convergence test at still higher resolution, and no direct comparison against analytic shock-drift-acceleration expectations; this leaves the robustness of the reported 2D/3D contrast uncertain and weakens the assertion that the difference is physical rather than numerical.

    Authors: We acknowledge the absence of error bars and higher-resolution convergence tests. In the revision we will add statistical error bars derived from multiple independent particle samples. A full convergence run at still finer resolution remains computationally prohibitive, but we will strengthen the discussion by comparing the measured injection efficiencies to analytic shock-drift-acceleration expectations; the 3D results approach the theoretical threshold more closely than the 2D results. We maintain that the 2D/3D contrast is physical because it persists across the existing resolution series, yet we agree the numerical robustness section requires bolstering. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [§3.1] §3.1 (hybrid setup): The hybrid approximation with fluid electrons is adopted without reported sensitivity tests to explicit resistivity, artificial viscosity, or out-of-plane dissipation; because these numerical ingredients couple differently to dimensionality, the observed 2D/3D injection disparity could arise from dimensionality-dependent grid-scale damping rather than from the geometric porosity of 3D turbulence.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this potential numerical concern. Our baseline runs used the standard hybrid formulation with only the code’s inherent numerical dissipation. To address the comment we will perform and document additional sensitivity simulations in which artificial viscosity and resistivity are varied; we will report whether the 2D/3D injection disparity remains. While we believe the porosity effect is fundamentally geometric and tied to the dimensionality of the turbulence, these tests will explicitly rule out artifacts arising from dimensionality-dependent grid-scale damping. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; results from direct numerical experiments

full rationale

The paper reports outcomes from 2D and 3D hybrid kinetic-ion/fluid-electron simulations of perpendicular shocks. The central claim—that ion injection depends on downstream magnetic turbulence porosity, which is only captured in 3D—is presented as an empirical finding from comparing simulation outputs across dimensions and resolutions. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are shown to reduce the reported 2D/3D contrast or porosity metric to a definition or input by construction. The work is self-contained against its own simulation benchmarks, with the necessity of high resolution justified by direct resolution studies rather than by any self-referential loop.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the hybrid plasma model, the interpretation of porosity as a physical rather than numerical property, and the assumption that Mach-number scans and resolution choices are representative of astrophysical shocks.

free parameters (2)
  • shock Mach number
    Varied across runs to study dependence of injection on shock strength
  • numerical resolution
    Must resolve scales below thermal ion gyroradius; value chosen to capture small-scale turbulence
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Hybrid approximation with kinetic ions and fluid electrons captures the essential ion-injection microphysics
    Standard modeling choice invoked when setting up the 2D and 3D runs
invented entities (1)
  • porosity of magnetic turbulence no independent evidence
    purpose: To quantify how easily particles traverse and return from the downstream region
    Introduced to explain the 2D versus 3D difference in injection efficiency

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5739 in / 1402 out tokens · 56867 ms · 2026-05-19T04:00:36.305110+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Unified Model for Shock Interaction and $\gamma$-Ray Emission in Classical Novae

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A toy model of reverse shocks in novae predicts GeV gamma rays near optical peak and potential TeV emission later, consistent with Fermi observations under an empirically thin post-shock layer.

  2. Ion Weibel Instability in the hybrid framework: the optimal resolution

    physics.plasm-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Hybrid simulations of the ion Weibel instability require a minimum grid resolution that scales with Alfvénic Mach number to correctly reproduce magnetic-field growth and saturation without introducing unphysical whist...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

    work page

  3. [3]

    2021, title Gamma Rays from Fast Black-hole Winds , , 921, 144, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1bb2

    Ajello , M., Baldini , L., Ballet , J., et al. 2021, title Gamma Rays from Fast Black-hole Winds , , 921, 144, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1bb2

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1bb2 2021

  4. [4]

    Amano , T., & Hoshino , M. 2009, title Electron Shock Surfing Acceleration in Multidimensions: Two-Dimensional Particle-in-Cell Simulation of Collisionless Perpendicular Shock , , 690, 244, 10.1088/0004-637X/690/1/244

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/690/1/244 2009

  5. [5]

    I., Leer , E., & Skadron , G

    Axford , W. I., Leer , E., & Skadron , G. 1977, title Acceleration of Cosmic Rays at Shock Fronts (Abstract) , in International Cosmic Ray Conference, Vol. 2, Acceleration of Cosmic Rays at Shock Fronts, 273--+. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1977ICRC....2..273A

    work page 1977

  6. [6]

    Ball, L., & Melrose, D. B. 2001, title Shock Drift Acceleration of Electrons, PASA, 18, 361, 10.1071/AS01047

    work page doi:10.1071/as01047 2001

  7. [7]

    Bell , A. R. 1978, title The acceleration of cosmic rays in shock fronts. I , MNRAS, 182, 147. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978MNRAS.182..147B/abstract

    work page 1978

  8. [8]

    A., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18706.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.417.1621D 417, 1621

    Bell, A. R., Schure, K. M., & Reville, B. 2011, title Cosmic ray acceleration at oblique shocks, , 418, 1208, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19571.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19571.x 2011

  9. [9]

    D., & Ostriker, J

    Blandford , R. D., & Ostriker , J. P. 1978, title Particle acceleration by astrophysical shocks , ApJL, 221, L29, 10.1086/182658

    work page doi:10.1086/182658 1978

  10. [10]

    2021, title Magnetic Field Amplification by the Weibel Instability at Planetary and Astrophysical Shocks with High Mach Number, Phys

    Bohdan, A., Pohl, M., Niemiec, J., et al. 2021, title Magnetic Field Amplification by the Weibel Instability at Planetary and Astrophysical Shocks with High Mach Number, Phys. Rev. Lett., 126, 095101, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.095101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.095101 2021

  11. [11]

    Brunetti, G., & Jones, T. W. 2014, title Cosmic Rays in Galaxy Clusters and Their Nonthermal Emission, International Journal of Modern Physics D, 23, 1430007, 10.1142/S0218271814300079

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218271814300079 2014

  12. [12]

    A., Scholer , M., et al

    Burgess , D., Lucek , E. A., Scholer , M., et al. 2005, title Quasi-parallel Shock Structure and Processes , , 118, 205, 10.1007/s11214-005-3832-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-005-3832-3 2005

  13. [13]

    2012, title Cosmic-ray acceleration in supernova remnants: non-linear theory revised , , 7, 38, 10.1088/1475-7516/2012/07/038

    Caprioli , D. 2012, title Cosmic-ray acceleration in supernova remnants: non-linear theory revised , , 7, 38, 10.1088/1475-7516/2012/07/038

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/07/038 2012

  14. [14]

    C., & Blasi , P

    Caprioli , D., Haggerty , C. C., & Blasi , P. 2020, title Kinetic Simulations of Cosmic-Ray-modified Shocks. II. Particle Spectra , , 905, 2, 10.3847/1538-4357/abbe05

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abbe05 2020

  15. [15]

    Simulations and Theory of Ion Injection at Non-relativistic Collisionless Shocks

    Caprioli , D., Pop , A., & Spitkovsky , A. 2015, title Simulations and Theory of Ion Injection at Non-relativistic Collisionless Shocks , , 798, 28. 1409.8291

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  16. [16]

    2014, ApJ, 783, 91, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/783/2/91

    Caprioli , D., & Spitkovsky , A. 2014, title Simulations of Ion Acceleration at Non-relativistic Shocks: I. Acceleration Efficiency , , 783, 91, 10.1088/0004-637X/783/2/91

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/783/2/91 2014

  17. [17]

    Diffusive Shock Re-Acceleration

    Caprioli, D., Zhang, H., & Spitkovsky, A. 2018, title Diffusive Shock Re-Acceleration, . 1801.01510

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  18. [18]

    B., & Vlahos, L

    Decker, R. B., & Vlahos, L. 1985, title Shock drift acceleration in the presence of waves, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 90, 47, https://doi.org/10.1029/JA090iA01p00047

    work page doi:10.1029/ja090ia01p00047 1985

  19. [19]

    D., Razzaque, S., Finke, J

    Dermer, C. D., Razzaque, S., Finke, J. D., & Atoyan, A. 2009, title Ultra-high-energy cosmic rays from black hole jets of radio galaxies, New Journal of Physics, 11, 065016, 10.1088/1367-2630/11/6/065016

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/11/6/065016 2009

  20. [20]

    A., & Silva , L

    Gargat \'e , L., Bingham , R., Fonseca , R. A., & Silva , L. O. 2007, title dHybrid: A massively parallel code for hybrid simulations of space plasmas , Computer Physics Communications, 176, 419, 10.1016/j.cpc.2006.11.013

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2006.11.013 2007

  21. [21]

    2014, ApJ, 794, 153, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/794/2/153

    Guo, X., Sironi, L., & Narayan, R. 2014, title Non-thermal Electron Acceleration in Low Mach Number Collisionless Shocks. I. Particle Energy Spectra and Acceleration Mechanism, , 794, 153, 10.1088/0004-637X/794/2/153

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/794/2/153 2014

  22. [22]

    C., & Caprioli , D

    Haggerty , C. C., & Caprioli , D. 2019, title dHybridR: A Hybrid Particle-in-cell Code Including Relativistic Ion Dynamics , , 887, 165, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab58c8

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab58c8 2019

  23. [23]

    2024, title Enhanced Magnetic Field Amplification by Ion-beam Weibel Instability in Weakly Magnetized Astrophysical Shocks , , 961, 157, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1594

    Jikei , T., Amano , T., & Matsumoto , Y. 2024, title Enhanced Magnetic Field Amplification by Ion-beam Weibel Instability in Weakly Magnetized Astrophysical Shocks , , 961, 157, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1594

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad1594 2024

  24. [24]

    C., & Ellison , D

    Jones , F. C., & Ellison , D. C. 1991, title The plasma physics of shock acceleration , Space Science Reviews, 58, 259. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991SSRv...58..259J

    work page 1991

  25. [25]

    C., Jokipii , J

    Jones , F. C., Jokipii , J. R., & Baring , M. G. 1998, title Charged-Particle Motion in Electromagnetic Fields Having at Least One Ignorable Spatial Coordinate , , 509, 238, 10.1086/306480

    work page doi:10.1086/306480 1998

  26. [26]

    N., & Takabe, H

    Kato, T. N., & Takabe, H. 2010, title Nonrelativistic collisionless shocks in weakly magnetized electron--ion plasmas: two-dimensional particle-in-cell simulation of perpendicular shock, The Astrophysical Journal, 721, 828, 10.1088/0004-637x/721/1/828

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/721/1/828 2010

  27. [27]

    Krymskii , G. F. 1977, title A regular mechanism for the acceleration of charged particles on the front of a shock wave , Akademiia Nauk SSSR Doklady, 234, 1306. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1977DoSSR.234R1306K

    work page 1977

  28. [28]

    2021, title Nonthermal Particle Acceleration at Highly Oblique Nonrelativistic Shocks , , 921, L14, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac30e0

    Kumar , N., & Reville , B. 2021, title Nonthermal Particle Acceleration at Highly Oblique Nonrelativistic Shocks , , 921, L14, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac30e0

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac30e0 2021

  29. [29]

    Lemb \`e ge, B., Savoini, P., Hellinger, P., & Tr \'a vn \'i cek, P. M. 2009, title Nonstationarity of a two-dimensional perpendicular shock: Competing mechanisms , Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics , 114, A03217, 10.1029/2008JA013618

    work page doi:10.1029/2008ja013618 2009

  30. [30]

    M., Winske , D., Goodrich , C

    Leroy , M. M., Winske , D., Goodrich , C. C., Wu , C. S., & Papadopoulos , K. 1982, title The structure of perpendicular bow shocks , , 87, 5081, 10.1029/JA087iA07p05081

    work page doi:10.1029/ja087ia07p05081 1982

  31. [31]

    M., Mazur , J

    Mason , G. M., Mazur , J. E., & Dwyer , J. R. 1999, title ^ 3 He Enhancements in Large Solar Energetic Particle Events , , 525, L133, 10.1086/312349

    work page doi:10.1086/312349 1999

  32. [32]

    N., & Hoshino , M

    Matsumoto , Y., Amano , T., Kato , T. N., & Hoshino , M. 2015, title Stochastic electron acceleration during spontaneous turbulent reconnection in a strong shock wave , Science, 347, 974, 10.1126/science.1260168

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1260168 2015

  33. [33]

    N., & Hoshino, M

    Matsumoto, Y., Amano, T., Kato, T. N., & Hoshino, M. 2017, title Electron Surfing and Drift Accelerations in a Weibel-Dominated High-Mach-Number Shock, Physical Review Letters, 119, 10.1103/physrevlett.119.105101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.105101 2017

  34. [34]

    H., Bell, A

    Matthews, J. H., Bell, A. R., Blundell, K. M., & Araudo, A. T. 2019, title Ultrahigh energy cosmic rays from shocks in the lobes of powerful radio galaxies, , 482, 4303, 10.1093/mnras/sty2936

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2936 2019

  35. [35]

    2012, title Strong evidence for hadron acceleration in Tycho's supernova remnant , A&A, 538, A81, 10.1051/0004-6361/201117855

    Morlino , G., & Caprioli , D. 2012, title Strong evidence for hadron acceleration in Tycho's supernova remnant , A&A, 538, A81, 10.1051/0004-6361/201117855

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117855 2012

  36. [36]

    2023, title Fast Particle Acceleration in 3D Hybrid Simulations of Quasiperpendicular Shocks , , 131, 095201, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.095201

    Orusa , L., & Caprioli , D. 2023, title Fast Particle Acceleration in 3D Hybrid Simulations of Quasiperpendicular Shocks , , 131, 095201, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.095201

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.095201 2023

  37. [37]

    2025, title Criteria for ion acceleration in laboratory magnetized quasi-perpendicular collisionless shocks: when are 2D simulations enough? , 2503.00163

    Orusa, L., & Valenzuela-Villaseca, V. 2025, title Criteria for ion acceleration in laboratory magnetized quasi-perpendicular collisionless shocks: when are 2D simulations enough? , 2503.00163

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    J., et al

    Park, G., Koo, B.-C., Gibson, S. J., et al. 2013, title H i SHELLS AND SUPERSHELLS IN THE I-GALFA H i 21 cm LINE SURVEY. I. FAST-EXPANDING H i SHELLS ASSOCIATED WITH SUPERNOVA REMNANTS, The Astrophysical Journal, 777, 14, 10.1088/0004-637X/777/1/14

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/777/1/14 2013

  39. [39]

    Scholer , M., Shinohara , I., & Matsukiyo , S. 2003, title Quasi-perpendicular shocks: Length scale of the cross-shock potential, shock reformation, and implication for shock surfing , Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 108, 1014, 10.1029/2002JA009515

    work page doi:10.1029/2002ja009515 2003

  40. [40]

    2000, title Strong Electron Acceleration at High Mach Number Shock Waves: Simulation Study of Electron Dynamics, The Astrophysical Journal, 543, L67, 10.1086/318161

    Shimada, N., & Hoshino, M. 2000, title Strong Electron Acceleration at High Mach Number Shock Waves: Simulation Study of Electron Dynamics, The Astrophysical Journal, 543, L67, 10.1086/318161

    work page doi:10.1086/318161 2000

  41. [41]

    2005, in American Institute of Physics Conference Series, Vol

    Spitkovsky , A. 2005, title Simulations of relativistic collisionless shocks: shock structure and particle acceleration , in American Institute of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 801, Astrophysical Sources of High Energy Particles and Radiation, ed. T. Bulik , B. Rudak , & G. Madejski , 345--350, 10.1063/1.2141897

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2141897 2005

  42. [42]

    L., Wilson , L

    Turner , D. L., Wilson , L. B., I., Goodrich , K. A., et al. 2021, title Direct Multipoint Observations Capturing the Reformation of a Supercritical Fast Magnetosonic Shock , , 911, L31, 10.3847/2041-8213/abec78

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abec78 2021

  43. [43]

    Weibel , E. S. 1959, title Spontaneously Growing Transverse Waves in a Plasma Due to an Anisotropic Velocity Distribution , , 2, 83, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.2.83

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.2.83 1959

  44. [44]

    2020, title Electron Acceleration in One-dimensional Nonrelativistic Quasi-perpendicular Collisionless Shocks , , 897, L41, 10.3847/2041-8213/aba11e

    Xu , R., Spitkovsky , A., & Caprioli , D. 2020, title Electron Acceleration in One-dimensional Nonrelativistic Quasi-perpendicular Collisionless Shocks , , 897, L41, 10.3847/2041-8213/aba11e

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aba11e 2020

  45. [45]

    Cluster magnetic fields from large-scale-structure and galaxy-cluster shocks

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt \@twocolumntrue 12pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key o...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/157998 2017