Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 65 references

Hot springs and dust reservoirs: JWST reveals the dusty, molecular aftermath of extragalactic stellar mergers

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Four luminous red novae observed by JWST carry roughly $10^{-4}$ to $10^{-3}$ solar masses of dust each, implying stellar mergers add about a quarter as much dust as core-collapse supernovae to the cosmic budget.

desk verdict The abstract announces a potentially important JWST study of luminous red nova dust, but the submitted manuscript body is an unrelated terahertz-nanomechanics paper, so the science is unevaluable as submitted. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.03932 v1 pith:2UFEUK6I submitted 2025-08-05 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GAastro-ph.HE

Viraj Karambelkar , Mansi Kasliwal , Ryan M. Lau , Jacob E. Jencson , Nadejda Blagorodnova , Marco A. Gomez-Munoz , Hugo Tranin , Maxime Wavasseur
show 2 more authors
Melissa Shahbandeh Kishalay De
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.GAastro-ph.HE
keywords luminousrednovaestellarmergerscommon-envelopeevolutioncosmicdustbudgetJWSTMIRImolecularspectroscopywaterfountainsourcescore-collapsesupernovae
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

JWST mid-infrared observations of four luminous red novae — dusty transients produced when massive binary stars merge after common-envelope evolution — yield dust masses of roughly $10^{-4}$ to $10^{-3}$ solar masses per event. These numbers are tens of percent of what a core-collapse supernova makes at the same stage, and because these mergers occur often enough, the paper estimates they add about a quarter as much dust as supernovae to the cosmic dust budget. The spectra also show water vapor, carbon monoxide, and silicon monoxide, giving a molecular fingerprint that ties merger remnants to 'water fountain' sources. The lower expansion velocities of merger ejecta may let more of that dust survive reverse shocks, potentially raising the contribution further. The result matters because it identifies a previously under-counted source of interstellar dust and gives observers a chemical way to recognize common-envelope ejecta.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is radiative-transfer modeling of the spectral energy distribution: the 5–25 $\mu$m continuum sets the dust mass, temperature, and optical depth, while a molecular slab emission model (water vapor, CO, and SiO) is superimposed to reproduce the spectral features. That fit converts four spectra into dust masses; multiplying by an adopted occurrence-rate ratio turns those masses into a cosmic-dust budget estimate.

What would settle it

A complete, untargeted census of luminous red novae in a fixed volume over a fixed time interval, with dust masses measured for every event from JWST spectra, would settle the claim: if the unbiased median dust mass or the rate ratio is much lower than assumed, the quarter-of-supernovae contribution drops proportionally.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using JWST MIRI photometry and spectroscopy of AT2021blu, AT2021biy, AT2018bwo, and M31-LRN-2015 — mergers of stars spanning roughly 3–24 $M_\odot$, seen 1100–3700 days after peak — the paper derives dust masses of $\approx 4.2\times10^{-5}$, $3\times10^{-4}$, $7.5\times10^{-5}$, and $7.7\times10^{-4}\,M_\odot$. These are 6–60% of the median dust masses of core-collapse supernovae at comparable phases. Because luminous red novae occur often enough, the paper estimates they add about a quarter as much dust to the cosmic budget as core-collapse supernovae do, and argues that lower ejecta velocities may reduce dust destruction by reverse shocks. The molecular emission, especially water vapor, p

Load-bearing premise

The cosmic-dust contribution of about 25% rests on the assumption that these four luminous red novae have typical dust masses and on the adopted occurrence rate of luminous red novae relative to core-collapse supernovae.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Luminous red novae are a measurable source of freshly condensed dust, comparable to a quarter of the core-collapse supernova dust budget.
  • Water vapor, CO, and SiO in merger ejecta make luminous red novae chemically continuous with water fountain sources, giving a new observational window on common-envelope evolution.
  • If reverse-shock destruction is weaker in slow merger ejecta, the true dust contribution could exceed the 25% estimate.
  • Late-time luminosities, temperatures, radii, and dust-to-gas ratios of the four remnants constrain what a merged star looks like years after the event.
  • Broader JWST infrared surveys of luminous red novae can refine the cosmic dust budget.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 25% figure holds for a larger sample, merger dust should be included in galaxy-scale dust enrichment models, particularly at high redshift where common-envelope merger rates may differ from the local ratio used here.
  • The water-vapor detection suggests that some Galactic 'water fountain' nebulae may be the remains of common-envelope mergers; a mid-infrared search for hot central sources would test that.
  • A time series of JWST spectra across the first few years after peak would separate newly condensed dust from pre-existing circumstellar dust, calibrating what fraction of the measured mass is genuinely new.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The submission announces a JWST study of four extragalactic luminous red novae (AT2021blu, AT2021biy, AT2018bwo, M31-LRN-2015), reporting MIRI 5-25 micron photometry and 5-12 micron spectroscopy, oxygen-rich molecular features (H2O, CO, SiO), radiative-transfer dust masses of roughly 4.2e-5 to 7.7e-4 Msun, and an estimated ~25% contribution of LRNe to the cosmic dust budget relative to CCSNe. The full text supplied, however, is not this paper. It is arXiv:2508.03933v1, "Towards terahertz nanomechanics" by Xie et al., on lithium niobate Lamb-wave resonators. The body contains no JWST data, no radiative-transfer modeling, no LRN target details, no fitting description, and no occurrence-rate derivation. Some LRN corner plots, DUSTY SED fits, and Mdust-vs-phase panels appear interleaved with the THz figures, but they are not described by any text or caption. The abstract's central numbers are therefore unsupported in this submission.

Significance. If the claimed result is correct, it would be a valuable contribution: it would place late-time JWST observations of four LRNe on record, tie stellar-merger chemistry to water-fountain sources, and quantify LRNe as a potentially non-negligible dust-production channel. The claimed per-object dust masses and the 25% budget figure are exactly the kind of quantitative claims that need to be inspectable. Here they are not: the manuscript body is a different paper, and the orphaned LRN figures cannot substitute for derivations. I therefore cannot assess soundness, and I do not regard the submission as reviewable in its present form.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full text (entire manuscript body)] The submitted text is a terahertz-nanomechanics paper by Xie, Wu, Shen, Fay, and Tang, not the luminous-red-nova paper described in the abstract. None of the load-bearing statements—dust masses of 4.2e-5, 3e-4, 7.5e-5, and 7.7e-4 Msun; molecular identifications; the ~25% cosmic dust budget—can be checked against the manuscript. This is not a local presentation issue but a complete absence of the analysis underlying the abstract.
  2. [Appended figures after Fig. 5] The submission contains multiple LRN-related panels with no captions or in-text references: MCMC corner plots for T_mol, N_H2O, N_CO, N_SiO, T_star, T_dust, tau_100um, and Mdust; a DUSTY SED comparison with silicate/alumina/olivine mixtures; and Mdust-vs-phase and luminosity panels for the four LRNe. The fitting procedure, data uncertainties, assumptions on grain composition, and error bars are not described anywhere, so the quoted masses cannot be reproduced or evaluated.
  3. [Abstract (occurrence-rate normalization)] The headline conclusion that LRNe contribute ~25% as much dust as CCSNe depends on 'accounting for their occurrence rates,' but the manuscript gives no definition of the LRN/CCSN rate ratio, no numerical value, no uncertainty or sensitivity analysis, and no discussion of whether the four targets are representative of the LRN population. Even setting aside the missing per-object fitting details, this extrapolation is not derivable from the submitted text.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Reference list] The reference list belongs to the THz paper and does not include the cited CCSN dust-mass benchmark (Shahbandeh et al. 2023) or prior LRN dust analyses; the abstract's comparison against CCSNe at 'similar phases' is therefore not traceable.
  2. [Figure interleaving] The LRN panels are paginated and interleaved with the THz figures without any separation or labeling; even as supplementary material, their axes, units, and fit definitions (e.g., 'sil' fraction, tau_V, tau_100um) are not defined.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found in the LRN abstract; the submitted full text is an unrelated THz paper, so the claimed derivation is unevaluable rather than circular.

full rationale

The circularity pass examines whether the paper's claimed results reduce by construction to their inputs. In the quoted abstract, the four dust masses (4.2e-5, 3e-4, 7.5e-5, and 7.7e-4 Msun) are presented as outputs of radiative-transfer fits to JWST/MIRI SEDs; the comparison to CCSN dust masses invokes an external benchmark (Shahbandeh et al. 2023), and the approximate 25% cosmic dust contribution is an extrapolation obtained by scaling those fitted masses by assumed LRN/CCSN occurrence rates. Extrapolation and inherited model assumptions are not the same as constructional circularity: the conclusion is not defined in terms of the input, and no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction. No load-bearing self-citation is visible in the abstract. However, the full text supplied in the submission is not the LRN paper described in the abstract; it is arXiv:2508.03933v1, 'Towards terahertz nanomechanics' (physics.app-ph), with different authors and content. The LRN fitting procedure, error analysis, and rate derivation are entirely absent from the supplied text, and the LRN figures appear orphaned under THz-paper captions. This is an omitted-analysis/unevaluability problem, not a demonstrated circular step. Per the hard rules, without quotable equations or a specific reduction of the claimed result to its inputs, circularity cannot be claimed. Hence the correct circularity score is 0, with the caveat that the actual LRN manuscript must be reviewed before the derivation can be substantively audited.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central dust masses are derived from radiative transfer fits with free temperature, optical depth, grain composition, and inner radius parameters (posterior distributions for Tdust, tau_100um, sil, and log(rin) appear in appended corner plot panels). The cosmic dust budget extrapolation depends on an assumed LRN occurrence rate relative to CCSNe and on the four targets being representative of the population. No new physical entities are proposed; water vapor and silicate features are presented as detected spectral signatures.

free parameters (3)
  • Dust temperature and optical depth (per object, DUSTY fits) = not stated in abstract; appended corner plots show Tdust roughly 340-1300 K and tau_100um roughly 0.04-0.1
    Dust masses are outputs of radiative transfer fits where temperature and optical depth are free parameters; the inferred masses are sensitive to these choices.
  • Grain composition fractions = not stated in abstract; figure panels show silicate:alumina = 0.9:0.1 and silicate:olivine = 0.4:0.6 fits
    Dust opacity and hence mass for a given flux depend on the adopted silicate/alumina/olivine mix; the abstract's masses assume a composition choice.
  • LRN occurrence rate relative to CCSNe = not stated in abstract
    The headline ~25% cosmic dust contribution is obtained by multiplying the per-event dust masses by this rate ratio; the estimate scales linearly with it.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Distances and line-of-sight extinctions for the four host galaxies are known from prior literature
    Converting MIR fluxes and spectra to luminosities, radii, and dust masses requires distance and reddening; the abstract does not establish these.
  • domain assumption The molecular features (water vapor, CO, SiO) originate in the merger ejecta, not the host galaxy or ISM
    The abstract uses these features to argue for oxygen-rich molecules and a water-fountain/CEE link; host or ISM contamination would break that interpretation.
  • domain assumption DUSTY radiative transfer prescription and optically thin or single-shell geometry describe the LRN dust
    Dust masses are conditional on the assumed opacity model, grain properties, and geometry used in the SED fitting.
  • domain assumption Median CCSN dust masses at similar phases (Shahbandeh et al. 2023) are the correct benchmark
    The 10/60/6/12% comparisons and the 25% budget ratio normalize to this external sample; systematic errors in that benchmark propagate into the headline claim.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Hot springs and dust reservoirs: JWST reveals the dusty, molecular aftermath of extragalactic stellar mergers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2UFEUK6I

@misc{pith2026250803932,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Hot springs and dust reservoirs: JWST reveals the dusty, molecular aftermath of extragalactic stellar mergers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2UFEUK6I}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.03932}
}
abstract

We present James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) observations of four Luminous Red Novae (LRNe): dusty, extragalactic transients from stellar mergers following common-envelope evolution (CEE) in massive binary stars. Our targets - AT2021blu, AT2021biy, AT2018bwo, and M31-LRN-2015 - span a broad range in progenitor primary masses ($\approx$3-24M$_{\odot}$) and post-merger ages ($\approx$1100-3700 days). All four were observed with the Mid-Infrared Instrument (MIRI) from 5-25$\mu$m; AT2021blu and AT2021biy additionally have 5-12$\mu$m spectra from the Low-Resolution Spectrometer. These spectra show strong features of oxygen-rich molecules, including water vapor, supporting the recent association of water fountain sources with CEE. Radiative transfer modeling of the spectral energy distributions yields dust masses of $\approx$4.2$\times10^{-5}$, 3$\times10^{-4}$, 7.5$\times10^{-5}$, and 7.7$\times10^{-4}$M$_{\odot}$ respectively - corresponding to $\approx10$%, 60%, 6% and 12% of median dust masses in core-collapse supernovae (CCSNe) at similar phases. Accounting for their occurrence rates, we estimate that LRNe can contribute $\sim$25% as much dust as CCSNe to the cosmic dust budget. Furthermore, the lower expansion velocities of LRNe may reduce dust destruction by reverse shocks compared to CCSNe, potentially increasing this contribution. In addition to dust masses, we use our \emph{JWST} observations to measure late-time properties such as the luminosities, temperatures, radii, and dust-to-gas ratios of the merger remnants. Our results highlight the need for broader infrared studies of LRNe to quantify their contribution to the cosmic dust budget, study the evolution of oxygen-rich molecules, and probe the final fates of CEE.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Terahertz technology and its appli- cations.Drug Invention Today, 5(2):157–163, 2013

    Ashish Y Pawar, Deepak D Sonawane, Kiran B Erande, and Deelip V Derle. Terahertz technology and its appli- cations.Drug Invention Today, 5(2):157–163, 2013

    work page 2013

  2. [2]

    Recent advances in the development of materials for terahertz metamaterial sensing.Advanced Optical Mate- rials, 10(1):2101008, 2022

    Suling Shen, Xudong Liu, Yaochun Shen, Junle Qu, Emma Pickwell-MacPherson, Xunbin Wei, and Yiwen Sun. Recent advances in the development of materials for terahertz metamaterial sensing.Advanced Optical Mate- rials, 10(1):2101008, 2022

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    In- dustrial applications of terahertz sensing: State of play

    Mira Naftaly, Nico Vieweg, and Anselm Deninger. In- dustrial applications of terahertz sensing: State of play. Sensors, 19(19):4203, 2019

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    A review of feasible appli- cations of THz waves in medical diagnostics and treat- ments.Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences, 12, 2021

    Tahereh Amini, Fazel Jahangiri, Zoha Ameri, and Mo- hammad Amin Hemmatian. A review of feasible appli- cations of THz waves in medical diagnostics and treat- ments.Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences, 12, 2021

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Terahertz waves: a tool for condensed matter, the life sciences and astronomy.Contemporary Physics, 54(3):143–165, 2013

    Yukio Kawano. Terahertz waves: a tool for condensed matter, the life sciences and astronomy.Contemporary Physics, 54(3):143–165, 2013

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    Powerful terahertz waves from long-wavelength infrared laser fila- ments.Light: Science & Applications, 9(1):186, 2020

    Vladimir Yu Fedorov and Stelios Tzortzakis. Powerful terahertz waves from long-wavelength infrared laser fila- ments.Light: Science & Applications, 9(1):186, 2020

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Applications of terahertz spec- troscopy in biosystems.ChemPhysChem, 8(17):2412– 2431, 2007

    David F Plusquellic, Karen Siegrist, Edwin J Heilweil, and Okan Esenturk. Applications of terahertz spec- troscopy in biosystems.ChemPhysChem, 8(17):2412– 2431, 2007

    work page 2007

  8. [8]

    Present and future of terahertz communications.IEEE Transactions on Ter- ahertz Science and Technology, 1(1):256–263, 2011

    Ho-Jin Song and Tadao Nagatsuma. Present and future of terahertz communications.IEEE Transactions on Ter- ahertz Science and Technology, 1(1):256–263, 2011

    work page 2011

Show all 65 references
  1. [9]

    Zeptogram-scale nanome- chanical mass sensing.Nano Letters, 6(4):583–586, 2006

    Ya-Tang Yang, Carlo Callegari, XL Feng, Kamil L Ek- inci, and Michael L Roukes. Zeptogram-scale nanome- chanical mass sensing.Nano Letters, 6(4):583–586, 2006

    2006

  2. [10]

    A nanomechanical mass sensor with yoctogram resolution.Nature Nanotechnology, 7(5):301– 304, 2012

    Julien Chaste, A Eichler, J Moser, G Ceballos, R Rurali, and A Bachtold. A nanomechanical mass sensor with yoctogram resolution.Nature Nanotechnology, 7(5):301– 304, 2012

    2012

  3. [11]

    Ul- trasensitive force detection with a nanotube mechanical resonator.Nature Nanotechnology, 8(7):493–496, 2013

    Joel Moser, J G¨ uttinger, Alexander Eichler, Mar ´ ıa J Es- plandiu, DE Liu, MI Dykman, and Adrian Bachtold. Ul- trasensitive force detection with a nanotube mechanical resonator.Nature Nanotechnology, 8(7):493–496, 2013

    2013

  4. [12]

    Accurate mass measurement of a levitated nanomechanical resonator for precision force-sensing.Nano Letters, 19(10):6711–6715, 2019

    Francesco Ricci, Marc T Cuairan, Gerard P Conangla, Andreas W Schell, and Romain Quidant. Accurate mass measurement of a levitated nanomechanical resonator for precision force-sensing.Nano Letters, 19(10):6711–6715, 2019

    2019

  5. [13]

    Nanomechanical torsional resonators for frequency-shift infrared thermal sensing.Nano Letters, 13(4):1528–1534, 2013

    XC Zhang, EB Myers, JE Sader, and ML Roukes. Nanomechanical torsional resonators for frequency-shift infrared thermal sensing.Nano Letters, 13(4):1528–1534, 2013

    2013

  6. [14]

    12-µ m-pitch electromechanical resonator for thermal sensing

    Ludovic Laurent, Jean-Jacques Yon, Jean-S´ ebastien Moulet, Michael Roukes, and Laurent Duraffourg. 12-µ m-pitch electromechanical resonator for thermal sensing. Physical Review Applied, 9(2):024016, 2018

    2018

  7. [15]

    Probing elasticity at the nanoscale: terahertz acoustic vibration of small metal nanoparticles.Nano Letters, 10(5):1853–1858, 2010

    Vincent Juv´ e, Aur´ elien Crut, Paolo Maioli, Michel Pel- larin, Michel Broyer, Natalia Del Fatti, and Fabrice Vall´ ee. Probing elasticity at the nanoscale: terahertz acoustic vibration of small metal nanoparticles.Nano Letters, 10(5):1853–1858, 2010

    2010

  8. [16]

    Lifetime of THz acoustic nanocavity modes

    G Rozas, MF Pascual Winter, Bernard Jusserand, A Fainstein, Bernard Perrin, E Semenova, and A Lema ˆ ıtre. Lifetime of THz acoustic nanocavity modes. Physical Review Letters, 102(1):015502, 2009

    2009

  9. [17]

    Quantum infor- mation processing with nanomechanical qubits.Physical Review Letters, 110(12):120503, 2013

    Simon Rips and Michael J Hartmann. Quantum infor- mation processing with nanomechanical qubits.Physical Review Letters, 110(12):120503, 2013

    2013

  10. [18]

    Optomechan- ical quantum information processing with photons and phonons.Physical Review Letters, 109(1):013603, 2012

    K Stannigel, Peter Komar, SJM Habraken, SD Bennett, Mikhail D Lukin, P Zoller, and P Rabl. Optomechan- ical quantum information processing with photons and phonons.Physical Review Letters, 109(1):013603, 2012

    2012

  11. [19]

    Quantum state preparation and tomography of entangled mechanical resonators.Nature, 604(7906):463–467, 2022

    E Alex Wollack, Agnetta Y Cleland, Rachel G Gru- enke, Zhaoyou Wang, Patricio Arrangoiz-Arriola, and Amir H Safavi-Naeini. Quantum state preparation and tomography of entangled mechanical resonators.Nature, 604(7906):463–467, 2022

    2022

  12. [20]

    Testing the limits of quantum mechanical superpositions.Nature Physics, 10(4):271–277, 2014

    Markus Arndt and Klaus Hornberger. Testing the limits of quantum mechanical superpositions.Nature Physics, 10(4):271–277, 2014

    2014

  13. [21]

    Nanomechanical test of quantum linearity.Optica, 7(10):1427–1434, 2020

    Stefan Forstner, Magdalena Zych, Sahar Basiri-Esfahani, Kiran E Khosla, and Warwick P Bowen. Nanomechanical test of quantum linearity.Optica, 7(10):1427–1434, 2020

    2020

  14. [22]

    Hybrid quantum systems with circuit quantum electrodynamics.Nature Physics, 16(3):257–267, 2020

    AA Clerk, KW Lehnert, P Bertet, JR Petta, and Y Naka- mura. Hybrid quantum systems with circuit quantum electrodynamics.Nature Physics, 16(3):257–267, 2020

    2020

  15. [23]

    Microwave-optical quantum frequency conversion.Optica, 8(8):1050–1064, 2021

    Xu Han, Wei Fu, Chang-Ling Zou, Liang Jiang, and Hong X Tang. Microwave-optical quantum frequency conversion.Optica, 8(8):1050–1064, 2021

    2021

  16. [24]

    Preparation and decay of a single quantum of vibration at ambient conditions.Physical Review X, 9(4):041007, 2019

    Santiago Tarrago Velez, Kilian Seibold, Nils Kipfer, Mitchell D Anderson, Vivishek Sudhir, and Christophe Galland. Preparation and decay of a single quantum of vibration at ambient conditions.Physical Review X, 9(4):041007, 2019

    2019

  17. [25]

    Resolved- sideband cooling of a micromechanical oscillator.Nature Physics, 4(5):415–419, 2008

    Albert Schliesser, R´ emi Rivi` ere, Georg Anetsberger, Olivier Arcizet, and Tobias J Kippenberg. Resolved- sideband cooling of a micromechanical oscillator.Nature Physics, 4(5):415–419, 2008

    2008

  18. [26]

    Sub-terahertz electromechanics

    Jiacheng Xie, Mohan Shen, Yuntao Xu, Wei Fu, Likai Yang, and Hong X Tang. Sub-terahertz electromechanics. Nature Electronics, pages 1–6, 2023

    2023

  19. [27]

    High acoustic velocity x-cut lithium niobate sub-terahertz elec- tromechanics.Applied Physics Letters, 124(7), 2024

    Jiacheng Xie, Mohan Shen, and Hong X Tang. High acoustic velocity x-cut lithium niobate sub-terahertz elec- tromechanics.Applied Physics Letters, 124(7), 2024

    2024

  20. [28]

    Sub- terahertz optomechanics.Optica, 11(5):724–725, 2024

    Jiacheng Xie, Mohan Shen, and Hong X Tang. Sub- terahertz optomechanics.Optica, 11(5):724–725, 2024

    2024

  21. [29]

    Bosworth, Lezli Matto, Nicholas R

    Jack Kramer, Bryan T. Bosworth, Lezli Matto, Nicholas R. Jungwirth, Omar Barrera, Florian Bergmann, Sinwoo Cho, Vakhtang Chulukhadze, Mark Goorsky, Nathan D. Orloff, and Ruochen Lu. Acoustic resonators above 100 GHz.Applied Physics Letters, 127(1):012204, 07 2025

    2025

  22. [30]

    Noncontact excitation of multi-GHz vii lithium niobate electromechanical resonators.Microsys- tems & Nanoengineering, 10(1):124, 2024

    Danqing Wang, Jiacheng Xie, Yu Guo, Mohan Shen, and Hong X Tang. Noncontact excitation of multi-GHz vii lithium niobate electromechanical resonators.Microsys- tems & Nanoengineering, 10(1):124, 2024

    2024

  23. [31]

    Surface and bulk two-level-system losses in lithium niobate acous- tic resonators.Physical Review Applied, 23(6):064055, 2025

    Rachel G Gruenke-Freudenstein, Erik Szakiel, Gitan- jali P Multani, Takuma Makihara, Akasha G Hayden, Ali Khalatpour, E Alex Wollack, Antonia Akoto-Yeboah, Salva Salmani-Rezaie, and Amir H Safavi-Naeini. Surface and bulk two-level-system losses in lithium niobate acous- tic re...

    2025

  24. [32]

    Electri- cal damage induced by reactive ion-beam etching of lead- zirconate-titanate thin films.Journal of Applied Physics, 97(11), 2005

    Caroline Soyer, Eric Cattan, and Denis Remiens. Electri- cal damage induced by reactive ion-beam etching of lead- zirconate-titanate thin films.Journal of Applied Physics, 97(11), 2005

    2005

  25. [33]

    High quality factor resonance at room temperature with nanostrings under high tensile stress.Journal of Applied Physics, 99(12), 2006

    Scott S Verbridge, Jeevak M Parpia, Robert B Re- ichenbach, Leon M Bellan, and Harold G Craighead. High quality factor resonance at room temperature with nanostrings under high tensile stress.Journal of Applied Physics, 99(12), 2006

    2006

  26. [34]

    Photonic guiding structures in lithium nio- bate crystals produced by energetic ion beams.Journal of Applied Physics, 106(8), 2009

    Feng Chen. Photonic guiding structures in lithium nio- bate crystals produced by energetic ion beams.Journal of Applied Physics, 106(8), 2009

    2009

  27. [35]

    Process induced poling and plasma induced damage of thin film PZT

    Jiahui Wang, Evert Houwman, Cora Salm, Minh Nguyen, Kurt Vergeer, and Jurriaan Schmitz. Process induced poling and plasma induced damage of thin film PZT. Microelectronic Engineering, 177:13–18, 2017

    2017

  28. [36]

    Direct detection of Akhiezer damping in a silicon MEMS resonator.Sci- entific Reports, 9(1):2244, 2019

    Janna Rodriguez, Saurabh A Chandorkar, Christopher A Watson, Grant M Glaze, CH Ahn, Eldwin J Ng, Yushi Yang, and Thomas W Kenny. Direct detection of Akhiezer damping in a silicon MEMS resonator.Sci- entific Reports, 9(1):2244, 2019

    2019

  29. [37]

    Fabrica- tion of high frequency nanometer scale mechanical res- onators from bulk Si crystals.Applied Physics Letters, 69(18):2653–2655, 1996

    Andrew N Cleland and Michael L Roukes. Fabrica- tion of high frequency nanometer scale mechanical res- onators from bulk Si crystals.Applied Physics Letters, 69(18):2653–2655, 1996

    1996

  30. [38]

    Measurement of me- chanical resonance and losses in nanometer scale silicon wires.Applied Physics Letters, 75(7):920–922, 1999

    Dustin W Carr, Stephane Evoy, Lidija Sekaric, Harold G Craighead, and Jeevak M Parpia. Measurement of me- chanical resonance and losses in nanometer scale silicon wires.Applied Physics Letters, 75(7):920–922, 1999

    1999

  31. [39]

    Single-crystal aluminum nitride nanomechanical resonators.Applied Physics Letters, 79(13):2070–2072, 2001

    AN Cleland, M Pophristic, and I Ferguson. Single-crystal aluminum nitride nanomechanical resonators.Applied Physics Letters, 79(13):2070–2072, 2001

  32. [40]

    Nanomechanical resonant structures in sil- icon nitride: fabrication, operation and dissipation is- sues.Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 101(1-2):215– 219, 2002

    L Sekaric, DW Carr, S Evoy, JM Parpia, and Harold G Craighead. Nanomechanical resonant structures in sil- icon nitride: fabrication, operation and dissipation is- sues.Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 101(1-2):215– 219, 2002

    2002

  33. [41]

    Nanomechanical resonant structures in nanocrystalline diamond.Applied Physics Letters, 81(23):4455–4457, 2002

    L Sekaric, JM Parpia, Harold G Craighead, T Feygelson, BH Houston, and JE Butler. Nanomechanical resonant structures in nanocrystalline diamond.Applied Physics Letters, 81(23):4455–4457, 2002

    2002

  34. [42]

    Nanodevice motion at microwave frequencies.Nature, 421(6922):496–496, 2003

    Xue Ming Henry Huang, Christian A Zorman, Mehran Mehregany, and Michael L Roukes. Nanodevice motion at microwave frequencies.Nature, 421(6922):496–496, 2003

    2003

  35. [43]

    PCS 1900 MHz duplexer using thin film bulk acoustic resonators (FBARs).Electronics Letters, 35(10):794–795, 1999

    Richard Ruby, P Bradley, JD Larson, and YJEL Osh- myansky. PCS 1900 MHz duplexer using thin film bulk acoustic resonators (FBARs).Electronics Letters, 35(10):794–795, 1999

    1900

  36. [44]

    R Gabl, H-D Feucht, H Zeininger, G Eckstein, M Schre- iter, R Primig, D Pitzer, and W Wersing. First results on label-free detection of DNA and protein molecules using a novel integrated sensor technology based on gravimet- ric detection principles.Biosensors and Bioelectronic...

    2004

  37. [45]

    Quantum ground state and single-phonon control of a mechanical resonator.Nature, 464(7289):697–703, 2010

    Aaron D O’Connell, Max Hofheinz, Markus Ansmann, Radoslaw C Bialczak, Mike Lenander, Erik Lucero, Matthew Neeley, Daniel Sank, H Wang, Martin Weides, et al. Quantum ground state and single-phonon control of a mechanical resonator.Nature, 464(7289):697–703, 2010

    2010

  38. [46]

    Detection of various self-assembled monolayers by AlN-based film bulk acoustic resonator

    Eungkwon Kim, Young-Kwan Choi, Juntae Song, and Jaehyoeng Lee. Detection of various self-assembled monolayers by AlN-based film bulk acoustic resonator. Materials Research Bulletin, 48(12):5076–5079, 2013

    2013

  39. [47]

    Surface acoustic wave resonators in the quantum regime.Physical Review B, 93(4):041411, 2016

    Riccardo Manenti, MJ Peterer, Ani Nersisyan, EB Mag- nusson, Andrew Patterson, and PJ Leek. Surface acoustic wave resonators in the quantum regime.Physical Review B, 93(4):041411, 2016

    2016

  40. [48]

    High-frequency surface acoustic wave devices based on ZnO/SiC layered structure.IEEE Electron Device Let- ters, 40(1):103–106, 2018

    Sulei Fu, Weibiao Wang, Lirong Qian, Qi Li, Zengtian Lu, Junyao Shen, Cheng Song, Fei Zeng, and Feng Pan. High-frequency surface acoustic wave devices based on ZnO/SiC layered structure.IEEE Electron Device Let- ters, 40(1):103–106, 2018

    2018

  41. [49]

    Phononic band structure engineering for high-Q gigahertz surface acoustic wave resonators on lithium niobate.Physical Review Applied, 12(1):014022, 2019

    Linbo Shao, Smarak Maity, Lu Zheng, Lue Wu, Amirhassan Shams-Ansari, Young-Ik Sohn, Eric Puma, MN Gadalla, Mian Zhang, Cheng Wang, et al. Phononic band structure engineering for high-Q gigahertz surface acoustic wave resonators on lithium niobate.Physical Review Applied, 12(1)...

    2019

  42. [50]

    Gigahertz phononic integrated circuits on thin-film lithium niobate on sapphire.Physical Review Applied, 15(1):014039, 2021

    Felix M Mayor, Wentao Jiang, Christopher J Sarabalis, Timothy P McKenna, Jeremy D Witmer, and Amir H Safavi-Naeini. Gigahertz phononic integrated circuits on thin-film lithium niobate on sapphire.Physical Review Applied, 15(1):014039, 2021

    2021

  43. [51]

    Electrical control of surface acoustic waves.Nature Electronics, 5(6):348–355, 2022

    Linbo Shao, Di Zhu, Marco Colangelo, Daehun Lee, Neil Sinclair, Yaowen Hu, Peter T Rakich, Keji Lai, Karl K Berggren, and Marko Lonˇ car. Electrical control of surface acoustic waves.Nature Electronics, 5(6):348–355, 2022

    2022

  44. [52]

    Optomechanical crystals.Nature, 462(7269):78–82, 2009

    Matt Eichenfield, Jasper Chan, Ryan M Camacho, Kerry J Vahala, and Oskar Painter. Optomechanical crystals.Nature, 462(7269):78–82, 2009

    2009

  45. [53]

    Laser cooling of a nanome- chanical oscillator into its quantum ground state.Nature, 478(7367):89–92, 2011

    Jasper Chan, TP Mayer Alegre, Amir H Safavi-Naeini, Jeff T Hill, Alex Krause, Simon Gr¨ oblacher, Markus As- pelmeyer, and Oskar Painter. Laser cooling of a nanome- chanical oscillator into its quantum ground state.Nature, 478(7367):89–92, 2011

    2011

  46. [54]

    Nanomechan- ical coupling between microwave and optical photons

    Joerg Bochmann, Amit Vainsencher, David D Awschalom, and Andrew N Cleland. Nanomechan- ical coupling between microwave and optical photons. Nature Physics, 9(11):712–716, 2013

    2013

  47. [55]

    Coherent coupling between radiofrequency, optical and acoustic waves in piezo- optomechanical circuits.Nature photonics, 10(5):346– 352, 2016

    Krishna C Balram, Marcelo I Davan¸ co, Jin Dong Song, and Kartik Srinivasan. Coherent coupling between radiofrequency, optical and acoustic waves in piezo- optomechanical circuits.Nature photonics, 10(5):346– 352, 2016

    2016

  48. [56]

    Hanbury brown and twiss interferometry of single phonons from an optome- chanical resonator.Science, 358(6360):203–206, 2017

    Sungkun Hong, Ralf Riedinger, Igor Marinkovi´ c, Andreas Wallucks, Sebastian G Hofer, Richard A Norte, Markus Aspelmeyer, and Simon Gr¨ oblacher. Hanbury brown and twiss interferometry of single phonons from an optome- chanical resonator.Science, 358(6360):203–206, 2017

    2017

  49. [57]

    Efficient bidirectional piezo-optomechanical transduction between microwave and optical frequency.Nature Com- munications, 11(1):1166, 2020

    Wentao Jiang, Christopher J Sarabalis, Yanni D Dah- mani, Rishi N Patel, Felix M Mayor, Timothy P McKenna, Rapha¨ el Van Laer, and Amir H Safavi-Naeini. Efficient bidirectional piezo-optomechanical transduction between microwave and optical frequency.Nature Com- munications, 1...

    2020

  50. [58]

    Superconducting qubit to viii optical photon transduction.Nature, 588(7839):599–603, 2020

    Mohammad Mirhosseini, Alp Sipahigil, Mahmoud Kalaee, and Oskar Painter. Superconducting qubit to viii optical photon transduction.Nature, 588(7839):599–603, 2020

    2020

  51. [59]

    5.4 GHz Lamb wave resonator on LiNbO 3 thin crystal plate and its application.Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 50(7S):07HD11, 2011

    Michio Kadota and Takashi Ogami. 5.4 GHz Lamb wave resonator on LiNbO 3 thin crystal plate and its application.Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 50(7S):07HD11, 2011

    2011

  52. [60]

    Toward Ka band acoustics: Lithium nio- bate asymmetrical mode piezoelectric MEMS resonators

    Yansong Yang, Ruochen Lu, Tomas Manzaneque, and Songbin Gong. Toward Ka band acoustics: Lithium nio- bate asymmetrical mode piezoelectric MEMS resonators. In2018 IEEE International Frequency Control Sympo- sium (IFCS), pages 1–5. IEEE, 2018

    2018

  53. [61]

    10–60-GHz electromechanical resonators us- ing thin-film lithium niobate.IEEE Transactions on Mi- crowave Theory and Techniques, 68(12):5211–5220, 2020

    Yansong Yang, Ruochen Lu, Liuqing Gao, and Song- bin Gong. 10–60-GHz electromechanical resonators us- ing thin-film lithium niobate.IEEE Transactions on Mi- crowave Theory and Techniques, 68(12):5211–5220, 2020

    2020

  54. [62]

    Thinning technology for lithium niobate wafer by surface activated bonding and chemical me- chanical polishing.Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 45(4S):3822, 2006

    Chia-Cheng Wu, Ray-Hua Horng, Dong-Sing Wuu, Tsai- Ning Chen, Shih-Shian Ho, Chia-Jen Ting, and Hung- Yin Tsai. Thinning technology for lithium niobate wafer by surface activated bonding and chemical me- chanical polishing.Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 45(4S):3822, 2006

    2006

  55. [63]

    Recent developments and applica- tions of chemical mechanical polishing.The Interna- tional Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 109(5):1419–1430, 2020

    Zhao-Wei Zhong. Recent developments and applica- tions of chemical mechanical polishing.The Interna- tional Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 109(5):1419–1430, 2020

    2020

  56. [64]

    Investigation of the defect density in ultra-thin Al 2O3 films grown using atomic layer deposition.Surface and Coatings Technol- ogy, 205(10):3334–3339, 2011

    Yadong Zhang, Dragos Seghete, Aziz Abdulagatov, Zachary Gibbs, Andrew Cavanagh, Ronggui Yang, Steven George, and Yung-Cheng Lee. Investigation of the defect density in ultra-thin Al 2O3 films grown using atomic layer deposition.Surface and Coatings Technol- ogy, 205(10):3334–3...

    2011

  57. [65]

    Atomic layer deposition of ferroelectric LiNbO3.Journal of Materials Chemistry C, 1(27):4283–4290, 2013

    Erik Østreng, Henrik H Sønsteby, Timo Sajavaara, Ola Nilsen, and Helmer Fjellv ˚ ag. Atomic layer deposition of ferroelectric LiNbO3.Journal of Materials Chemistry C, 1(27):4283–4290, 2013. Data availability The data that support the findings of this study are avail- able from...

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.