A study on Type-2 isomorphic circulant graphs. Part 2: Type-2 isomorphic circulant graphs of orders 16, 24, 27
Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 22:23 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Modified definition of Type-2 isomorphism identifies 8 pairs of circulant graphs on 16 vertices, 32 pairs on 24 vertices, and 12 triples on 27 vertices.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
Using the modified definition of Type-2 isomorphism of circulant graphs C_n(R) w.r.t. m, where m > 1 divides gcd(n, r), m^3 divides n and r in R, the paper obtains Type-2 isomorphic circulant graphs of orders 16, 24 and 27 and shows that the total number of pairs of Type-2 isomorphic circulant graphs of orders 16 and 24 are 8 and 32, respectively and the total number of triples of Type-2 isomorphic circulant graphs of order 27 are 12.
What carries the argument
The further modified definition of Type-2 isomorphism w.r.t. m that requires m > 1 divides gcd(n, r), m^3 divides n, and r in R, which simplifies the identification of isomorphic pairs and triples.
If this is right
- Exactly 8 pairs of Type-2 isomorphic circulant graphs exist for order 16.
- Exactly 32 pairs of Type-2 isomorphic circulant graphs exist for order 24.
- Exactly 12 triples of Type-2 isomorphic circulant graphs exist for order 27.
- The modified conditions reduce the computational work needed to list the isomorphic copies for these three orders.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The same style of modification may make enumeration feasible for additional small orders that satisfy the divisibility pattern.
- The reported counts supply concrete benchmarks that independent computational isomorphism software could confirm or adjust.
- The approach of tailoring an isomorphism definition to exploit number-theoretic constraints on n and r could be tested on other families of vertex-transitive graphs.
Load-bearing premise
The added divisibility conditions on m correctly capture exactly the Type-2 isomorphisms that exist for the chosen orders without omitting any or adding extraneous ones.
What would settle it
An exhaustive check of all possible connection sets for n equal to 16, 24 and 27, followed by direct verification of graph isomorphism, that returns a different total number of pairs or triples than 8, 32 and 12 respectively.
read the original abstract
This study is the $2^{nd}$ part of a detailed study on Type-2 isomorphic circulant graphs having ten parts \cite{v2-1}-\cite{v2-10}. Definition of Type-2 isomorphism of circulant graphs $C_n(R)$ w.r.t. $m$ was further modified by the author by considering $m > 1$ divides $\gcd(n, r)$, $m^3$ divides $n$ and $r\in R$ and studied Type-2 isomorphic circulant graphs w.r.t. $m$ = 2. This modification simplifies our calculations while finding isomorphic circulant graphs of Type-2. In this paper, using the modified definition \ref{d4.2}, we obtain Type-2 isomorphic circulant graphs of orders 16, 24 and 27 and show that the total number of pairs of Type-2 isomorphic circulant graphs of orders 16 and 24 are 8 and 32, respectively and the total number of triples of Type-2 isomorphic circulant graphs of order 27 are 12.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. This paper is the second installment in a ten-part series on Type-2 isomorphic circulant graphs. It further modifies the definition of Type-2 isomorphism for circulant graphs C_n(R) by imposing the conditions that m > 1 divides gcd(n, r), m^3 divides n, and r ∈ R (with focus on m = 2). Using this modified Definition 4.2, the author enumerates Type-2 isomorphic families and reports exactly 8 pairs for order 16, 32 pairs for order 24, and 12 triples for order 27.
Significance. If the modified definition can be shown to preserve the original Type-2 isomorphism classes, the reported counts would supply concrete, order-specific data on the frequency of such isomorphic circulant graphs for small n. This could serve as a reference point for future classification efforts in circulant graph theory, though the manuscript provides no independent verification or machine-checked enumeration to strengthen the result.
major comments (2)
- [Definition 4.2] Definition 4.2: The additional constraints (m > 1 divides gcd(n, r), m^3 divides n, and r ∈ R) are presented as a simplification of the prior Type-2 notion, yet no lemma or argument establishes that this restriction is equivalent—i.e., that it neither excludes valid Type-2 isomorphisms nor introduces extraneous pairs/triples. Because the reported totals (8, 32, 12) are obtained directly from this definition, the equivalence is load-bearing for the central claims.
- [Results sections for n=16, 24, 27] Enumeration results (orders 16, 24, 27): The manuscript asserts the final counts without supplying the explicit list of graphs, the enumeration algorithm, or any verification steps. For these small orders an omitted case or overcount would directly change the reported numbers, and the absence of such details prevents independent checking of exhaustiveness.
minor comments (1)
- The paper refers to a ten-part series but supplies only minimal cross-references to how the current modification interacts with definitions established in the earlier parts.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We respond to each major comment below and indicate the changes we will make in the revised version.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Definition 4.2] Definition 4.2: The additional constraints (m > 1 divides gcd(n, r), m^3 divides n, and r ∈ R) are presented as a simplification of the prior Type-2 notion, yet no lemma or argument establishes that this restriction is equivalent—i.e., that it neither excludes valid Type-2 isomorphisms nor introduces extraneous pairs/triples. Because the reported totals (8, 32, 12) are obtained directly from this definition, the equivalence is load-bearing for the central claims.
Authors: We appreciate the referee's observation. In this part of the series, Definition 4.2 introduces a further restricted version of Type-2 isomorphism specifically to make explicit enumeration feasible for the small orders 16, 24, and 27. The manuscript does not claim or prove equivalence to the definition used in earlier parts; the restriction is presented as a computational simplification. The reported counts (8 pairs, 32 pairs, 12 triples) are obtained strictly under the conditions of this modified definition. In the revision we will add an explicit statement in the introduction and immediately after Definition 4.2 clarifying that this is a working definition adopted for the present study and that relating the restricted counts back to the original Type-2 notion is reserved for later papers in the series. revision: yes
-
Referee: [Results sections for n=16, 24, 27] Enumeration results (orders 16, 24, 27): The manuscript asserts the final counts without supplying the explicit list of graphs, the enumeration algorithm, or any verification steps. For these small orders an omitted case or overcount would directly change the reported numbers, and the absence of such details prevents independent checking of exhaustiveness.
Authors: We agree that greater transparency is needed for these small orders. Although the manuscript describes the overall approach, it does not include the explicit lists of pairs/triples or a detailed enumeration procedure. In the revised version we will add an appendix containing the complete lists of the 8 pairs for order 16, the 32 pairs for order 24, and the 12 triples for order 27. We will also include a concise description of the enumeration algorithm: systematic generation of admissible connection sets R that satisfy the divisibility conditions of Definition 4.2, followed by direct verification of the isomorphism relation. This will enable independent checking. We will additionally note the manual verification steps used to confirm exhaustiveness for these orders. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No circularity: counts are direct enumerations under the paper's stated definition
full rationale
The manuscript cites its own prior parts [v2-1]–[v2-10] only to establish the modified Definition 4.2 (m > 1 dividing gcd(n,r), m³ dividing n, r ∈ R, studied for m=2). It then applies this definition to list and count the qualifying circulant graphs on the finite vertex sets of orders 16, 24 and 27. The reported totals (8 pairs, 32 pairs, 12 triples) are therefore the direct output of exhaustive classification under the chosen criteria; they do not reduce to the definition by algebraic identity, statistical fitting, or self-referential uniqueness theorem. No prediction, parameter estimation, or load-bearing lemma is present whose validity collapses back onto the inputs. The work is self-contained as an enumeration exercise once the definition is fixed.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (2)
- standard math Circulant graphs C_n(R) are defined in the usual way with vertices on a cycle and edges determined by the set R.
- domain assumption The further modified definition of Type-2 isomorphism w.r.t. m is the correct and useful notion for this study.
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AbsoluteFloorClosure.lean, IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.leanreality_from_one_distinction, alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
Definition 2.6 … m > 1 be a divisor of gcd(n,r) … θ_{n,m,t}(C_n(R)) = C_n(θ_{n,m,t}(R)) … Type-2 isomorphic circulant graphs of orders 16 and 24 are 8 and 32 respectively
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
A study on Type-2 isomorphic circulant graphs. Part 3: 384 pairs of Type-2 isomorphic circulant graphs $C_{32}(R)$
All 384 pairs of Type-2 isomorphic circulant graphs C_32(R) have been obtained.
-
A study on Type-2 isomorphic circulant graphs. Part 6: Abelian groups $(T2_{n,m}(C_n(R)), \circ)$ and $(V_{n,m}(C_n(R)), \circ)$
V_{n,m}(C_n(R)) forms an Abelian group under ∘ and T2_{n,m}(C_n(R)) is a subgroup, where T2 collects C_n(R) and all its Type-2 isomorphic copies w.r.t. m.
-
A study on Type-2 isomorphic circulant graphs. Part 4: 960 triples of Type-2 isomorphic circulant graphs $C_{54}(R)$
There are 960 triples of Type-2 isomorphic circulant graphs C_54(R) where each triple is Type-2 isomorphic with m=3.
-
A study on Type-2 isomorphic circulant graphs. Part 1: Type-2 isomorphic circulant graphs $C_n(R)$ w.r.t. $m$ = 2
Certain circulant graphs C_16(1,2,7) and C_16(2,3,5) are Type-2 isomorphic w.r.t. m=2, and for n>=2 families C_8n(R) with R={2,2s-1,4n-(2s-1)} and C_8n(S) are Type-2 isomorphic w.r.t. m=2 under stated conditions on n and s.
-
A Study on Type-2 Isomorphic Circulant Graphs: Part 8: $C_{432}(R)$, $C_{6750}(S)$ -- each has 2 types of Type-2 isomorphic circulant graphs
Two families of circulant graphs C_432(R) and C_6750(S) each possess Type-2 isomorphic variants for two values of m.
-
A study on Type-2 isomorphic circulant graphs. Part 5: Type-2 isomorphic circulant graphs of orders 48, 81, 96
Enumeration yields 18 Type-2 isomorphic pairs for n=48, 72 pairs for n=96, and 27 triples for n=81 among circulant graphs C_n with 3 or 4 generators.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
A. Adam,Research problem 2-10, J. Combinatorial Theory,3(1967), 393
work page 1967
-
[2]
P. J. Davis,Circulant Matrices,Wiley, New York, 1979
work page 1979
-
[3]
West,Introduction to Graph Theory,2 ed Edi., Pearson Education (Singapore) Pvt
Dauglas B. West,Introduction to Graph Theory,2 ed Edi., Pearson Education (Singapore) Pvt. Ltd., 2002
work page 2002
-
[4]
B. Elspas and J. Turner,Graphs with circulant adjacency matrices, J. Combinatorial Theory,9(1970), 297-307
work page 1970
- [5]
-
[6]
Vilfred, ∑ -labelled Graphs and Circulant Graphs, Ph.D
V. Vilfred, ∑ -labelled Graphs and Circulant Graphs, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India (1996)
work page 1996
-
[7]
V. Vilfred,A Study on Isomorphic Properties of Circulant Graphs: Self-complimentary, isomorphism, Cartesian product and factorization, Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems (ASTES) Journal,2 (6)(2017), 236–241. DOI: 10.25046/ aj020628. ISSN: 2415-6698
work page 2017
-
[8]
Vilfred,A Theory of Cartesian Product and Factorization of Circulant Graphs, Hindawi Pub
V. Vilfred,A Theory of Cartesian Product and Factorization of Circulant Graphs, Hindawi Pub. Corp. - J. Discrete Math.,V ol. 2013, Article ID 163740, 10 pages
work page 2013
-
[9]
V. Vilfred Kamalappan,A study on Type-2 Isomorphic Circulant Graphs and related Abelian Groups, arXiv: 2012.11372v11 [math.CO] (26 Nov. 2024), 183 pages
-
[10]
V. Vilfred Kamalappan,New Families of Circulant Graphs Without Cayley Isomorphism Property withr i = 2, Int. Journal of Applied and Computational Mathematics, (2020) 6:90, 36 pages. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40819-020- 00835-0. Published online: 28.07.2020 by Springer
-
[11]
V. Vilfred and P. Wilson,Families of Circulant Graphs without Cayley Isomorphism Property withm i = 3, IOSR Journal of Mathematics,15 (2)(2019), 24–31. DOI: 10.9790/5728-1502022431. ISSN: 2278-5728, 2319-765X
-
[12]
V. Vilfred and P. Wilson,New Family of Circulant Graphs without Cayley Isomorphism Property withm i = 5,Int. Journal of Scientific and Innovative Mathematical Research,3 (6)(2015), 39–47
work page 2015
-
[13]
V. Vilfred and P. Wilson,New Family of Circulant Graphs without Cayley Isomorphism Property withm i = 7,IOSR Journal of Mathematics,12(2016), 32–37. Department of Mathematics, Central University of Kerala, Periye, Kasaragod, Kerala, India - 671 316. Email address:vilfredkamal@gmail.com
work page 2016
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.