Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 40 references

A Divide-and-Conquer Tiling Method for the Design of Large Aperiodic Phased Arrays

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A divide-and-conquer domino tiling can synthesize large aperiodic phased arrays faster than global optimization while keeping the aperture fully covered and radiation performance competitive.

desk verdict Supplied full text is the wrong paper; based on the abstract alone the tiling method is plausible and timely, but no substantive review is possible. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.09682 v1 pith:4FI6LSE7 submitted 2025-08-13 eess.SY cs.SY

Nicola Anselmi , Paolo Rocca , Giovanni Toso , Andrea Massa This is my paper
classification eess.SYcs.SY
keywords aperiodicphasedarraysirregulartilingdominodivide-and-conquerdesignsubarray-onlybeamformingLEOsatellitecommunicationsaperturecoveragearraysynthesis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that large phased arrays with control limited to modular subarrays can be synthesized by recursively dividing the aperture into sub-areas and tiling each one with domino-shaped element pairs, while ensuring the remaining untiled support stays fully coverable. The point is practical: if the local tiling rule works, large arrays for LEO satellite communications can be designed much faster than by global optimization, without sacrificing full use of the aperture or radiation quality. Representative comparisons against competitive state-of-the-art synthesis methods are offered as evidence of effectiveness and computational efficiency. The paper does not yet specify how the sub-area subdivision is chosen, which is the main open knob in the method.

What carries the argument

The central object is the recursive local domino tiling of the aperture. A domino is a two-element modular cluster; the method divides the support into sub-areas and tiles each with dominoes under a full-coverage constraint on the residual untiled region. This constraint is what turns global synthesis into a sequence of local tiling decisions, carrying the claimed speedup.

What would settle it

Take the largest aperture used in the paper, re-tile it with the same method but a different subdivision order, and compare peak sidelobe level and grating-lobe level across the scan range; if either exceeds the reported design threshold, the claim that local gap-free tiling is sufficient for competitive radiation performance is falsified. Alternatively, a runtime comparison on a large non-rectangular aperture where the method scales worse than global synthesis would falsify the computational-efficiency claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a divide-and-conquer tiling strategy can replace global synthesis for aperiodic phased arrays with subarray-only amplitude and phase control. Starting from the full antenna support, the aperture is split into sub-areas; each sub-area is locally tiled with dominoes (two-element clusters), and the choice of tiling is constrained so that the remaining untiled part of the support can still be fully tiled. The recursion continues until the entire aperture is covered. The authors argue that this local, gap-free tiling is both computationally cheaper than state-of-the-art global synthesis and effective in radiation performance, and they demonstrate this with repres

Load-bearing premise

The method's effectiveness rests on the premise that a tiling which is locally chosen and has no gaps in the aperture also yields a globally acceptable radiation pattern, including low sidelobes and no grating lobes across the scan range.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Large-aperture designs for LEO satellite links become practical without global optimization, because the tiling recursion splits the problem into small local steps.
  • Subarray-only amplitude and phase control, the low-cost hardware constraint, is preserved by construction since every tile is a two-element modular cluster.
  • Full aperture coverage is guaranteed by the tiling constraint, so no radiating area is wasted.
  • Competitive peak sidelobe and grating-lobe behavior, as reported against state-of-the-art methods, would make the method a drop-in alternative for array synthesis.
  • Antenna designers get guidelines for handling large PAs in LEO use cases, an application where cost and scanning performance both matter.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension not claimed in the paper is to other tile shapes (triominoes, tetrominoes, or hexagonal clusters); the divide-and-conquer coverage argument should carry over, but the radiation trade-offs are untested.
  • The subdivision size, number, and ordering are degrees of freedom that likely trade pattern quality against runtime; quantifying this trade-off would tell designers when to prefer local tiling over global synthesis.
  • If local coverage is as strong a constraint as the paper suggests, one could couple the tiling with fast pattern surrogates or adaptive subdivision choices to tailor the recursion to the array's scan requirements—an adaptive version the abstract leaves implicit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript under review consists of an abstract proposing a 'divide-and-conquer tiling method' for designing large aperiodic phased arrays with subarray-only amplitude and phase control, followed by a full text that is in fact a different paper: 'Surg-InvNeRF: Invertible NeRF for 3D tracking and reconstruction in surgical vision' (arXiv:2508.09681). The abstract states that the aperture is subdivided into sub-areas that are locally domino-tiled under a full-coverage condition on the remaining untiled support, and it claims representative results and comparisons with state-of-the-art synthesis methods. No derivation, algorithm specification, simulation configuration, numerical results, figures, or tables for the tiling method appear in the submitted text. The claimed method and its performance therefore cannot be inspected.

Significance. The problem is practically relevant: large phased arrays with modular subarrays and only amplitude/phase control are of interest for cost-effective LEO satellite-communication antennas, and an irregular tiling approach that is computationally cheaper than global synthesis would be a useful contribution. The divide-and-conquer idea is conceptually plausible. However, the submission is, in its current form, unverifiable: it provides no supporting derivations, no tables of radiation performance, no baseline definitions, no code, and no reproducible experiments. The claimed effectiveness and computational efficiency are assertions of the abstract only. If the correct manuscript were available, the significance could be assessed; on the submitted text, the contribution is not established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full Text] The supplied full text is not the phased-array paper. It is a separate manuscript titled 'Surg-InvNeRF: Invertible NeRF for 3D tracking and reconstruction in surgical vision' and contains no mention of tiling, phased arrays, subarrays, or array synthesis. The article body therefore provides zero support for the abstract's claims. This is not a missing minor detail; it is the entire technical content of the claimed paper.
  2. [Abstract] The claims of 'representative results' and comparisons with 'competitive state-of-the-art synthesis methods' are unsubstantiated: no numerical results, figures, tables, or baseline names appear in the submitted version. The phrase 'reported to prove the effectiveness' is not accompanied by any report. Consequently the performance and computational-efficiency claims are unsupported.
  3. [Abstract] The method description leaves two load-bearing choices unspecified: how sub-areas are chosen (size, number, ordering) and how the domino tiling is placed within each sub-area. The abstract's full-coverage condition is purely geometric; it guarantees no electromagnetic property such as sidelobe suppression, grating-lobe rejection, or scan behavior. Without specifying these choices and demonstrating their effect on pattern quality, the claimed competitiveness with global synthesis is not established by the submitted text.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'jointly fulfilling the full-coverage condition on the remaining untiled part' is ambiguous: it is unclear whether the tiling is simultaneous over all sub-areas, recursive, or sequential.
  2. [Abstract] The acronym 'PA' is introduced as 'PAs' in the opening sentence, but the abstract later refers to 'the PA support' without a prior singular definition; please define and use consistently.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity identifiable: supplied full text is a different paper, so the target paper's derivation chain cannot be examined.

full rationale

The target manuscript is arXiv:2508.09682 on a divide-and-conquer tiling method for large aperiodic phased arrays, but the supplied full text is arXiv:2508.09681, a surgical vision paper (Surg-InvNeRF). No equations, algorithm details, fitted parameters, or comparison results from the target paper are available for inspection. Under the hard rule that circularity may only be claimed when a specific reduction can be quoted from the paper, no circular step can be substantiated. The abstract alone describes a constructive tiling algorithm whose effectiveness is asserted against unnamed state-of-the-art synthesis methods; this raises verifiability concerns but does not constitute evidence that any claimed prediction is equivalent to an input by construction. The mismatch is a verification blockage, not a circularity finding. Therefore the appropriate score is 0, with no circular steps identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Inferred from the abstract only because the supplied full text is a different manuscript. The real algorithm may contain more free parameters (e.g., weights in the cost function, number of recursive levels) that are unobservable here. The 'domino' is an existing tiling concept applied to subarray modules, not a new physical entity.

free parameters (2)
  • sub-area subdivision size (dimensions of the local tiling regions)
    The divide-and-conquer step partitions the aperture into sub-areas; their size and count are design choices that trade local flexibility (performance) against number of recursive steps (speed). The abstract does not report how they are set.
  • domino tiling placement rule (choice of domino orientation and location in each sub-area)
    Local tiling requires a rule for where to place each domino pair and in which order; this heuristic determines the final aperiodic layout and is not specified in the abstract.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Restricting control to the subarray level (shared amplitude and phase per module) still permits radiation patterns competitive with element-level control
    The whole method optimizes inside this restricted control space (abstract: 'sub-array-only amplitude and phase control'); if the control space cannot meet the requirements, no tiling can fix it.
  • domain assumption A gap-free domino tiling of the aperture is a sufficient proxy for a usable radiating aperture
    The abstract's optimization target is the 'full-coverage condition' on the untiled part; coverage is a geometric statement, while sidelobe and grating-lobe behavior depend on the full complex excitation distribution, which the abstract does not discuss.
  • standard math Every sub-area reached by the algorithm admits a domino tiling (classical tiling theory)
    The recursive scheme relies on existence of domino tilings of the defined sub-areas; standard combinatorial results are implicitly assumed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Divide-and-Conquer Tiling Method for the Design of Large Aperiodic Phased Arrays." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4FI6LSE7

@misc{pith2026250809682,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Divide-and-Conquer Tiling Method for the Design of Large Aperiodic Phased Arrays},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4FI6LSE7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.09682}
}
read the original abstract

Due to the growing request from modern wireless applications of cost-affordable and high-gain scanning antenna solutions, the design of large phased arrays (PAs) with radiating elements organized into modular clusters with sub-array-only amplitude and phase control is a key topic. In this paper, an innovative irregular tiling method is proposed where, according to a divide-and-conquer strategy, the antenna aperture is subdivided into sub-areas that are locally domino-tiled by jointly fulfilling the full-coverage condition on the remaining untiled part of the PA support. Selected representative results, including comparisons with competitive state-of-the-art synthesis methods, are reported to prove the effectiveness and the computational efficiency of the proposed tiling approach. Use-cases of current relevance for low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite communications are discussed, as well, to provide the antenna designers useful practical guidelines for handling large PAs.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [11]

    Stereo depth estimation via self-supervised contrastive representation learning,

    S. Tukra and S. Giannarou, “Stereo depth estimation via self-supervised contrastive representation learning,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) , vol. 13437 LNCS, pp. 604–614, 2022

    work page 2022

  2. [12]

    E-DSSR: Efficient dynamic surgical scene reconstruction with transformer-based stereoscopic depth perception,

    Y . Long, Z. Li, C. H. Yee, C. F. Ng, R. H. Taylor, M. Unberath, and Q. Dou, “E-DSSR: Efficient dynamic surgical scene reconstruction with transformer-based stereoscopic depth perception,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) , vol. 12904 LNCS, pp. 415–425, 7 2021

    work page 2021

  3. [13]

    Self-supervised domain adaptation for patient-specific, real-time tissue tracking,

    S. Ihler, F. Kuhnke, M. H. Laves, and T. Ortmaier, “Self-supervised domain adaptation for patient-specific, real-time tissue tracking,” Lec- ture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) , vol. 12263 LNCS, pp. 54–64, 2020

    work page 2020

  4. [14]

    Bimodal camera pose prediction for endoscopy,

    A. Rau, B. Bhattarai, L. Agapito, and D. Stoyanov, “Bimodal camera pose prediction for endoscopy,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics, vol. 5, pp. 978–989, 4 2022

    work page 2022

  5. [15]

    Structure-from-Motion Revisited,

    J. L. Sch ¨onberger and J.-M. Frahm, “Structure-from-Motion Revisited,” in Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , 2016

    work page 2016

  6. [16]

    Evaluation and stability analysis of video-based navigation system for functional endoscopic sinus surgery on in vivo clinical data,

    S. Leonard, A. Sinha, A. Reiter, M. Ishii, G. L. Gallia, R. H. Taylor, and G. D. Hager, “Evaluation and stability analysis of video-based navigation system for functional endoscopic sinus surgery on in vivo clinical data,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging , vol. 37, pp. 2185–2195, 10 2018

    work page 2018

  7. [17]

    Visual slam for handheld monocular endoscope,

    O. G. Grasa, E. Bernal, S. Casado, I. Gil, and J. M. Montiel, “Visual slam for handheld monocular endoscope,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 33, pp. 135–146, 1 2014

    work page 2014

  8. [18]

    3d endoscopic depth estimation using 3d surface-aware constraints,

    S. Zhao, C. Wang, Q. Wang, Y . Liu, and S. K. Zhou, “3d endoscopic depth estimation using 3d surface-aware constraints,” , 3 2022

    work page 2022

Show all 40 references
  1. [19]

    Stereo dense scene reconstruction and accurate localization for learning-based navigation of laparoscope in minimally invasive surgery,

    R. Wei, B. Li, H. Mo, B. Lu, Y . Long, B. Yang, Q. Dou, Y . Liu, and D. Sun, “Stereo dense scene reconstruction and accurate localization for learning-based navigation of laparoscope in minimally invasive surgery,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering , vol. 70, pp. 488...

    2023

  2. [20]

    Dense depth estimation in monocular endoscopy with self-supervised learning methods,

    X. Liu, A. Sinha, M. Ishii, G. D. Hager, A. Reiter, R. H. Taylor, and M. Unberath, “Dense depth estimation in monocular endoscopy with self-supervised learning methods,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 39, pp. 1438–1447, 5 2020

    2020

  3. [21]

    Endo-Depth-and-Motion: Reconstruction and tracking in endoscopic videos using depth networks and photometric constraints,

    D. Recasens, J. Lamarca, J. M. Facil, J. M. Montiel, and J. Civera, “Endo-Depth-and-Motion: Reconstruction and tracking in endoscopic videos using depth networks and photometric constraints,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , vol. 6, pp. 7225–7232, 10 2021

    2021

  4. [22]

    NeRF: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis,

    B. Mildenhall, P. P. Srinivasan, M. Tancik, J. T. Barron, R. Ramamoorthi, and R. Ng, “NeRF: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in B...

    2020

  5. [23]

    3D gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering,

    B. Kerbl, G. Kopanas, T. Leimkuehler, and G. Drettakis, “3D gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 42, p. 14, 8 2023

    2023

  6. [24]

    Neural rendering for stereo 3d reconstruction of deformable tissues in robotic surgery,

    Y . Wang, Y . Long, S. H. Fan, and Q. Dou, “Neural rendering for stereo 3d reconstruction of deformable tissues in robotic surgery,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) , vol. 1343...

    2022 doi

  7. [25]

    Realistic surgical image dataset generation based on 3D gaussian splatting,

    T. Zeng, G. Loza, J. Hu, P. Valdastri, and D. Jones, “Realistic surgical image dataset generation based on 3D gaussian splatting,” Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2024 , 7 2024

    2024

  8. [26]

    Free- SurGS: Sfm-free 3D gaussian splatting for surgical scene reconstruc- tion,

    J. Guo, J. Wang, D. Kang, W. Dong, W. Wang, and Y . hui Liu, “Free- SurGS: Sfm-free 3D gaussian splatting for surgical scene reconstruc- tion,” Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2024, 7 2024

    2024

  9. [27]

    Tracking everything everywhere all at once,

    Q. Wang, Y . Y . Chang, R. Cai, Z. Li, B. Hariharan, A. Holynski, and N. Snavely, “Tracking everything everywhere all at once,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision , pp. 19 738– 19 749, 6 2023

    2023

  10. [28]

    Surgical tat- toos in infrared: A dataset for quantifying tissue tracking and mapping,

    A. Schmidt, O. Mohareri, S. DiMaio, and S. E. Salcudean, “Surgical tat- toos in infrared: A dataset for quantifying tissue tracking and mapping,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging , vol. XX, p. 1, 9 2023

    2023

  11. [29]

    Stereo correspondence and reconstruction of endoscopic data challenge,

    M. Allan, J. Mcleod, C. Wang, J. C. Rosenthal, Z. Hu, N. Gard, P. Eisert, K. X. Fu, T. Zeffiro, W. Xia, Z. Zhu, H. Luo, F. Jia, X. Zhang, X. Li, L. Sharan, T. Kurmann, S. Schmid, R. Sznitman, D. Psychogyios, M. Azizian, D. Stoyanov, L. Maier-Hein, and S. Speidel, “Stereo corre...

    2021

  12. [30]

    SENDD: Sparse efficient neural depth and deformation for tissue tracking,

    A. Schmidt, O. Mohareri, S. DiMaio, and S. E. Salcudean, “SENDD: Sparse efficient neural depth and deformation for tissue tracking,” 5 2023

    2023

  13. [31]

    Digging into self-supervised monocular depth prediction,

    C. Godard, O. Mac Aodha, M. Firman, and G. J. Brostow, “Digging into self-supervised monocular depth prediction,” October 2019

    2019

  14. [32]

    Motion compensated slam for image guided surgery,

    P. Mountney and G. Z. Yang, “Motion compensated slam for image guided surgery,”Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinfor- matics), vol. 6362 LNCS, pp. 496–504, 2010

    2010

  15. [33]

    EndoSLAM dataset and an unsupervised monocular visual odometry and depth estimation approach for endoscopic videos,

    K. B. Ozyoruk, G. I. Gokceler, T. L. Bobrow, G. Coskun, K. Incetan, Y . Almalioglu, F. Mahmood, E. Curto, L. Perdigoto, M. Oliveira, H. Sahin, H. Araujo, H. Alexandrino, N. J. Durr, H. B. Gilbert, and M. Turan, “EndoSLAM dataset and an unsupervised monocular visual odometry an...

    2021

  16. [34]

    MIS-SLAM: Real-time large scale dense deformable SLAM system in minimal invasive surgery based on heterogeneous computing,

    J. Song, J. Wang, L. Zhao, S. Huang, and G. Dissanayake, “MIS-SLAM: Real-time large scale dense deformable SLAM system in minimal invasive surgery based on heterogeneous computing,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , vol. 3, pp. 4068–4075, 3 2018

    2018

  17. [35]

    Tracking monocular camera pose and deformation for slam inside the human body,

    J. J. G. Rodriguez, J. M. Montiel, and J. D. Tardos, “Tracking monocular camera pose and deformation for slam inside the human body,” IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems , vol. 2022- October, pp. 5278–5285, 2022

    2022

  18. [36]

    EMDQ-SLAM: Real-time high-resolution reconstruction of soft tissue surface from stereo laparoscopy videos,

    H. Zhou and J. Jayender, “EMDQ-SLAM: Real-time high-resolution reconstruction of soft tissue surface from stereo laparoscopy videos,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) , vol. 129...

    2021

  19. [37]

    RNNSLAM: Reconstructing the 3d colon to visualize missing regions during a colonoscopy,

    R. Ma, R. Wang, Y . Zhang, S. Pizer, S. K. McGill, J. Rosenman, and J. M. Frahm, “RNNSLAM: Reconstructing the 3d colon to visualize missing regions during a colonoscopy,” Medical Image Analysis, vol. 72, p. 102100, 8 2021

    2021

  20. [38]

    Transferring relative monocular depth to surgical vision with temporal consistency,

    C. Budd and T. Vercauteren, “Transferring relative monocular depth to surgical vision with temporal consistency,” , pp. 692–702, 2024

    2024

  21. [39]

    Revisiting stereo depth estimation from a sequence- to-sequence perspective with transformers,

    Z. Li, X. Liu, N. Drenkow, A. Ding, F. X. Creighton, R. H. Taylor, and M. Unberath, “Revisiting stereo depth estimation from a sequence- to-sequence perspective with transformers,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 6177–6186, 11 2020

    2020

  22. [40]

    Online 3D reconstruction and dense tracking in endoscopic videos,

    M. Hayoz, C. Hahne, T. Kurmann, M. Allan, G. Beldi, D. Candinas, ablo M ´arquez-Neila, and R. Sznitman, “Online 3D reconstruction and dense tracking in endoscopic videos,” Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2024 , 9 2024

    2024

  23. [41]

    Tracking everything in robotic-assisted surgery,

    B. Zhan, W. Zhao, Y . Fang, B. Du, F. Vasconcelos, D. Stoyanov, D. S. Elson, and B. Huang, “Tracking everything in robotic-assisted surgery,” , 9 2024

    2024

  24. [42]

    Track everything everywhere fast and robustly,

    Y . Song, J. Lei, Z. Wang, L. Liu, and K. Daniilidis, “Track everything everywhere fast and robustly,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) , vol. 15061 LNCS, pp. 343–359, 3 2024

    2024

  25. [43]

    NerfAcc: Efficient sampling accelerates nerfs,

    R. Li, H. Gao, M. Tancik, and A. Kanazawa, “NerfAcc: Efficient sampling accelerates nerfs,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision , pp. 18 491–18 500, 5 2023

    2023

  26. [44]

    Raft: Recurrent all-pairs field transforms for optical flow,

    Z. Teed and J. Deng, “Raft: Recurrent all-pairs field transforms for optical flow,” 3 2020

    2020

  27. [45]

    CoTracker3: Simpler and better point tracking by pseudo- labelling real videos,

    N. Karaev, I. Makarov, J. Wang, N. Neverova, A. Vedaldi, C. Rupprecht, and M. Ai, “CoTracker3: Simpler and better point tracking by pseudo- labelling real videos,” , 10 2024

    2024

  28. [46]

    MFT: Long-term tracking of every pixel,

    M. Neoral, J. Serych, and J. Matas, “MFT: Long-term tracking of every pixel,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision , 2024, pp. 6837–6847

    2024

  29. [47]

    Mip-NeRF 360: Unbounded anti-aliased neural radiance fields,

    J. T. Barron, B. Mildenhall, D. Verbin, P. P. Srinivasan, and P. Hedman, “Mip-NeRF 360: Unbounded anti-aliased neural radiance fields,” Pro- ceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, vol. 2022-June, pp. 5460–5469, 11 2021

    2022

  30. [48]

    Segment anything in medical images,

    J. Ma, Y . He, F. Li, L. Han, C. You, and B. Wang, “Segment anything in medical images,” Nature Communications 2024 15:1 , vol. 15, pp. 1–9, 1 2024

    2024

  31. [49]

    HexPlane: A fast representation for dynamic scenes,

    A. Cao and J. Johnson, “HexPlane: A fast representation for dynamic scenes,” Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pp. 130–141, 8 2023

    2023

  32. [50]

    Point tracking in surgery–the 2024 surgical tattoos in infrared (STIR) challenge,

    A. Schmidt, M. A. Karaoglu, S. Sinha et al. , “Point tracking in surgery–the 2024 surgical tattoos in infrared (STIR) challenge,” arXiv:2503.24306, 03 2025

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.