Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 1 minor 6 cited by

A search for minute-time-scale flares from the transient AT\,2024wpp

T0 review · 4 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read AT2024wpp shows no minute-scale optical flares, placing a 2-sigma upper limit of 2 percent on the flaring duty cycle.

desk verdict A clean, honestly hedged null result on minute-flares in AT2024wpp that extends the AT2022tsd program to a second object; the numbers are plausible from the abstract alone, but I cannot check the methods because the supplied body is an unrelated exoplanet paper. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.18359 v1 pith:5BHC7R42 submitted 2025-08-25 astro-ph.HE

Eran O. Ofek , Lior Ozer , Ruslan Konno , Nimrod Strasman , Ping Chen , Sagi Ben-Ami , David Polishook , Alexander Krassilchtchikov
show 16 more authors
Simone Garrappa Erez A. Zimmermann Enrico Segre Asaf Horowicz Avishay Gal-Yam Yarin M. Shani Stanislav Fainer Michael Engel Yahel Sofer-Rimalt Anna Y. Q. Ho Yossi Shvartzvald Ofer Yaron Kris Rybicki Arie Blumenzweig Sarah Spitzer Ron Arad
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords AT2024wppfastblueopticaltransientsAT2018cow-likeminute-timescaleflaresdutycycleupperlimitflareratetime-domainastronomyLargeArraySurveyTelescope
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether AT2024wpp, a fast blue optical transient in the same class as AT2018cow and AT2022tsd, produces the brief, ultraluminous optical flares seen in AT2022tsd. It monitors the object for about 23 hours spread over days 28 to 74 after the estimated time of zero flux, with sensitivity to flares above roughly 3e42 erg/s at signal-to-noise above 5. The search finds no flares. If the result holds, it places a one-sided 2-sigma upper limit below 2 percent on the fraction of time the source spends flaring, and a flare rate below about 0.11 per hour. That would mean minute-timescale luminous flaring like AT2022tsd's is not universal to 18cow-like transients, pointing instead to diversity within the class, viewing-angle effects such as beaming, or a changing optical depth toward the central engine.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing quantity is the flaring duty cycle: the fraction of observing time the source spends in a detectable flare. The argument converts a null detection into a bound on that fraction using the achieved sensitivity floor, defined by the ability to detect 3e42 erg/s flares at signal-to-noise above 5, together with about 23 hours of high-cadence coverage. The upper limit on the duty cycle, not the raw count of flares, is what turns 'no flares seen' into a statement about the class of 18cow-like transients.

What would settle it

A few-minute optical flare from AT2024wpp at a luminosity above 3e42 erg/s within days 28 to 74, recovered either in independent high-cadence observations or by re-analyzing the same images with a different flare template, would directly contradict the claimed upper limit.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper reports an intensive, high-cadence optical search for minute-duration flares from the 18cow-like transient AT2024wpp, conducted between 28 and 74 days after the approximate zero-flux epoch. In about 23 hours of observation, no flares brighter than the detection threshold of 3e42 erg/s were seen. From this null detection the authors derive a one-sided 2-sigma confidence upper limit of <0.02 on the flare duty cycle and a flare rate lower than about 0.11 per hour. Their central claim is that AT2024wpp did not display AT2022tsd-like flaring activity during the searched window, implying that not all 18cow-like objects exhibit a high rate of minute-timescale luminous flares.

Load-bearing premise

The null result only constrains flares that occur in the searched 28-to-74-day window, last a few minutes, and are bright and blue enough to match the assumed template; if AT2024wpp's flares happen earlier, later, fainter, or redder, the upper limit does not apply.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, the result shows that minute-timescale luminous flaring is not a universal property of 18cow-like fast blue optical transients.
  • It gives a quantitative upper bound, a duty cycle below 2 percent and a flare rate below about 0.11 per hour, that future models of the class must not exceed for objects observed at similar epochs.
  • It narrows the explanation for AT2022tsd's prolific flaring to population diversity, orientation or beaming effects, or a time-dependent optical depth that had not fallen below unity during the search window.
  • It indicates that future searches for such flares should sample earlier or later epochs, or survey a larger sample of 18cow-like events, to distinguish these possibilities.
  • It provides a direct observational constraint on models that predict widespread, sustained flaring activity in all 18cow-like transients.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not rule out flaring outside the 28-to-74-day window; if AT2024wpp flared earlier or later, the all-epoch duty cycle could still be substantial while the search window remained quiet.
  • A population of flares that is fainter than 3e42 erg/s or redder than the assumed template would evade this search, so a template-free or stacked search of the same images could probe a different region of flare parameter space.
  • If AT2022tsd's flares are beamed, the absence of flares in AT2024wpp is consistent with intrinsic similarity across the class and would be explained by a viewing-angle difference rather than a physical difference in the engines.
  • The same null-detection methodology could be applied to archival high-cadence data of other 18cow-like transients to estimate what fraction of the class flares at minute timescales.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper as submitted consists of an abstract claiming a search for minute-timescale optical flares from the fast blue optical transient AT2024wpp, using the Large Array Survey Telescope (LAST) over 23 hours between 28 and 74 days after the approximate zero-flux epoch. The abstract reports no flares and derives a one-sided 2-sigma upper limit of <0.02 on the flare duty cycle and <0.11/hr on the flare rate, with a sensitivity of 3e42 erg/s at S/N>5. However, the full text supplied with this submission is not the manuscript for arXiv:2508.18359; it is an exoplanet orbital-decay paper (arXiv:2508.18355) analyzing TESS transit times of hot Jupiter systems. None of the methods, observations, sensitivity calculations, light curves, or statistical derivations supporting the AT2024wpp claims are present in this submission.

Significance. If the claimed null result and upper limits are correct, they would provide a useful constraint on the flaring behavior of 18cow-like transients, bearing on population diversity and geometric/beaming interpretations. The abstract is internally coherent: zero detected flares in 23 hours of exposure can plausibly translate to order-of-magnitude upper limits on duty cycle and rate. However, the quantitative value of the result depends entirely on details that are absent: the definition and uncertainty of the zero-flux epoch, the conversion from observed counts to physical luminosity, the cadence and gap structure of the 23 hours, the flare search algorithm, and the statistical procedure for the one-sided confidence limit. Because the full text is a different paper, none of these can be checked. The significance of the astrophysical conclusion cannot currently be assessed.

major comments (4)
  1. [Full text (all sections)] The supplied full text is not the manuscript described in the abstract. It is an exoplanet transit-timing analysis (arXiv:2508.18355) that contains no mention of AT2024wpp, LAST, optical flares, duty cycles, or the quoted upper limits. This is a load-bearing omission: the abstract's central quantitative claims have no accompanying methods, data, or derivations in the submitted manuscript, so they are unverifiable.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states the search window is '28 and 74 days after the approximate time of zero flux' but gives no uncertainty on this zero-flux epoch. If the epoch uncertainty is comparable to or larger than the window length, the coverage may not bracket the flare-active phase. Without this information, the null detection cannot be interpreted as a constraint on AT2022tsd-like flaring.
  3. [Abstract] The claimed sensitivity 'allows one to detect 3e42 erg/s flares at S/N>5' is not justified. Converting a measured S/N threshold to a physical flare luminosity requires assumptions about distance, reddening, spectral template, flare duration, and the temporal sampling/cadence of the 23 hours. None of these are provided in the abstract, and the full text does not contain the relevant calibration. This is central to the upper limits.
  4. [Abstract] The statistical derivation of the one-sided 2-sigma upper limit is not shown. From zero observed flares, the upper limit on the rate depends on the effective exposure time, the number of independent time bins, and the assumed flare duration; the duty-cycle limit similarly depends on how the exposure is decomposed. The abstract reports specific numbers (<0.02, <0.11/hr) without the statistical framework needed to reproduce them. This is not a minor presentation issue because these numbers are the paper's main result.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'one-sided 2-sigma confidence' should be clarified as 'one-sided 95% confidence upper limit' or equivalent; '2-sigma confidence' is nonstandard and could confuse the confidence level with the significance threshold.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity identified; the null-detection limits follow from counting statistics and an external sensitivity template.

full rationale

The abstract's quantitative claims follow from a standard counting experiment: about 23 hours of LAST observations with a stated S/N>5 sensitivity to ~3e42 erg/s flares, zero detected flares, and one-sided Poisson statistics yield the quoted upper limits on duty cycle (<0.02) and flare rate (<0.11/hr). No parameter describing AT2024wpp's flare activity is fitted from the absence of flares; the sensitivity is set by comparing to the AT2022tsd-like flare template, and the interpretive hypotheses (population diversity, beaming, optical depth) are post hoc alternatives rather than quantities tuned to force the null result. The weakest premise—that the 28-74 day window, assumed colors, and assumed durations bracket any real flare activity—is an external assumption affecting robustness, not a definitional identity or a fitted-input-called-prediction. A caveat is that the supplied full text is actually a different exoplanet orbital-decay manuscript (arXiv:2508.18355), so the target paper's methods cannot be audited here; however, even the abstract alone exhibits no reduction of a claimed prediction to an input, no self-citation chain, and no renaming of a known result as a derivation. The conclusion is therefore not circular, though its quantitative validity depends on unverifiable external assumptions about the search window and sensitivity calibration.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted free parameters are visible in the abstract. The quoted sensitivity (3x10^42 erg/s at S/N>5) and limits (<0.02, <0.11/hr) are derived quantities from exposure, distance, and zero counts, not tuned to match a target. The duty-cycle limit implicitly assumes a flare duration and spectral template, which is captured as an axiom rather than a fitted parameter. No new particles, forces, or mechanisms are introduced; the three offered explanations are existing hypotheses.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption AT2024wpp is an AT2018cow-like fast blue optical transient with a known distance and extinction, so a 3x10^42 erg/s sensitivity threshold is meaningful.
    The abstract's luminosity sensitivity requires an assumed distance and line of sight; loaded in the sensitivity statement.
  • domain assumption AT2022tsd-like flares in AT2024wpp would occur within the 28 to 74 day window and would be detectable at S/N>5 with the assumed duration and color template.
    The non-detection constrains only flares inside the searched window and parameter space; this is the premise that makes the null result informative.
  • domain assumption The approximate time of zero flux is accurate enough that the 28 to 74 day window is the relevant phase for flare activity.
    Abstract: 'between 28 and 74 days after the approximate time of zero flux'; an uncertain t0 shifts the effective phase coverage.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A search for minute-time-scale flares from the transient AT\,2024wpp." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5BHC7R42

@misc{pith2026250818359,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A search for minute-time-scale flares from the transient AT\,2024wpp},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5BHC7R42}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.18359}
}
read the original abstract

The AT 2018cow-like fast blue optical transient AT2022tsd showed a large number of few-minute-duration, high-luminosity (~10^43 erg/s) flares. We present an intensive search for such flares from another 18cow-like event, AT2024wpp. We have used the Large Array Survey Telescope (LAST) to observe this transient between 28 and 74 days after the approximate time of zero flux. The target was observed for about 23 hours to a sensitivity that allows one to detect 3x10^42 erg/s flares at S/N>5. No optical flares have been found, suggesting a one-sided 2-sigma confidence upper limit of <0.02 on the flare's duty cycle, and flare rate lower than about 0.11/hr. These limits suggest that not all 18cow-like objects display a high rate of minute-timescale luminous flares. This can be explained either by diversity in the 18cow-like population or by viewing angle effects (e.g., beaming), or rather that the optical depth towards the central emitting region did not fall below unity during the particular search window.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Luminous Fast Blue Optical Transients as "Failed" Gravitational-wave Sources: Helium Core$-$Black Hole Mergers Following Delayed Dynamical Instability

    astro-ph.HE 2025-10 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Luminous fast blue optical transients may be the aftermath of a black hole merging with a companion star's helium core after prolonged mass transfer, producing a super-Eddington accretion flare.

  2. The Most Luminous Known Fast Blue Optical Transient AT 2024wpp: Unprecedented Evolution and Properties in the Ultraviolet to the Near-Infrared

    astro-ph.HE 2025-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    AT 2024wpp radiated more than 10^51 erg in 45 days, showing persistent 20,000 K blackbody emission, two-velocity hydrogen and helium lines, and a near-infrared excess, indicating an accretion-powered compact object.

  3. Implications of the UV/optical Plateau of AT2018cow

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A wind-and-irradiation disk model fits the AT2018cow UV plateau with accretor masses from 1.4 to ~100 solar masses, removing the need for a >200 solar-mass black hole.

  4. The Most Luminous Known Fast Blue Optical Transient AT 2024wpp: Unprecedented Evolution and Properties in the X-rays and Radio

    astro-ph.HE 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AT 2024wpp, the most luminous known fast blue optical transient, shows an extremely hard X-ray flare around day 50 and an accelerating radio shock, favoring a compact-object engine in a dense shell environment.

  5. The Emission and Suppression of Line Features in Luminous Transients

    astro-ph.HE 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    High luminosities above 10^44 erg/s and compact radii below 10^14 cm suppress H and He lines via high ionization and temperature, with non-homologous compact outflows needed for persistent featurelessness in LFBOTs and TDEs.

  6. Constraints on Late-Time Flaring from Luminous Fast Blue Optical Transients using the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite and the Zwicky Transient Facility

    astro-ph.HE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

    TESS and ZTF observations of 12 LFBOTs yield no late-time flares after SSO attribution, constraining central engine lifetimes to hundreds of days or less.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages · cited by 6 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Heger , author C

    author author A. Heger , author C. L. \ Fryer , author S. E. \ Woosley , author N. Langer , \ and\ author D. H. \ Hartmann ,\ 10.1086/375341 journal journal \ volume 591 ,\ pages 288 ( year 2003 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0212469 arXiv:astro-ph/0212469 [astro-ph] NoStop

    arXiv 2003

  2. [2]

    author author R. M. \ Quimby , author S. R. \ Kulkarni , author M. M. \ Kasliwal , author A. Gal-Yam , author I. Arcavi , author M. Sullivan , author P. Nugent , author R. Thomas , author D. A. \ Howell , author E. Nakar , author L. Bildsten , author C. Theissen , author N. M. \ Law , author R. Dekany , author G. Rahmer , author D. Hale , author R. Smith ...

    arXiv 2011

  3. [3]

    Smith , author S

    author author N. Smith , author S. B. \ Cenko , author N. Butler , author J. S. \ Bloom , author M. M. \ Kasliwal , author A. Horesh , author S. R. \ Kulkarni , author N. M. \ Law , author P. E. \ Nugent , author E. O. \ Ofek , author D. Poznanski , author R. M. \ Quimby , author B. Sesar , author S. Ben-Ami , author I. Arcavi , author A. Gal-Yam , author...

    arXiv 2011

  4. [4]

    author author M. R. \ Drout , author R. Chornock , author A. M. \ Soderberg , author N. E. \ Sand ers , author R. McKinnon , author A. Rest , author R. J. \ Foley , author D. Milisavljevic , author R. Margutti , \ and\ author E. Berger ,\ 10.1088/0004-637X/794/1/23 journal journal \ volume 794 ,\ eid 23 ( year 2014 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.3668 arXi...

    arXiv 2014

  5. [5]

    Rapidly Rising Transients in the Supernova - Superluminous Supernova Gap

    author author I. Arcavi , author W. M. \ Wolf , author D. A. \ Howell , author L. Bildsten , author G. Leloudas , author D. Hardin , author S. Prajs , author D. A. \ Perley , author G. Svirski , author A. Gal-Yam , author B. Katz , author C. McCully , author S. B. \ Cenko , author C. Lidman , author M. Sullivan , author S. Valenti , author P. Astier , aut...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  6. [6]

    author author T. A. \ Thompson , author P. Chang , \ and\ author E. Quataert ,\ 10.1086/421969 journal journal \ volume 611 ,\ pages 380 ( year 2004 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0401555 arXiv:astro-ph/0401555 [astro-ph] NoStop

    arXiv 2004

  7. [7]

    author author S. E. \ Woosley ,\ 10.1088/2041-8205/719/2/L204 journal journal \ volume 719 ,\ pages L204 ( year 2010 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.0698 arXiv:0911.0698 [astro-ph.HE] NoStop

    arXiv

  8. [8]

    Magnetar Driven Shock Breakout and Double Peaked Supernova Light Curves

    author author D. Kasen , author B. D. \ Metzger , \ and\ author L. Bildsten ,\ 10.3847/0004-637X/821/1/36 journal journal \ volume 821 ,\ eid 36 ( year 2016 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1507.03645 arXiv:1507.03645 [astro-ph.HE] NoStop

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    Dexter \ and\ author D

    author author J. Dexter \ and\ author D. Kasen ,\ 10.1088/0004-637X/772/1/30 journal journal \ volume 772 ,\ eid 30 ( year 2013 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.7240 arXiv:1210.7240 [astro-ph.HE] NoStop

    2013 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Chen , author A

    author author P. Chen , author A. Gal-Yam , author J. Sollerman , author S. Schulze , author R. S. \ Post , author C. Liu , author E. O. \ Ofek , author K. K. \ Das , author C. Fremling , author A. Horesh , author B. Katz , author D. Kushnir , author M. M. \ Kasliwal , author ...

    2024 arXiv

  3. [11]

    author author A. Y. Q. \ Ho , author D. A. \ Perley , author P. Chen , author S. Schulze , author V. Dhillon , author H. Kumar , author A. Suresh , author V. Swain , author M. Bremer , author S. J. \ Smartt , author J. P. \ Anderson , author G. C. \ Anupama , author S. Awiphan...

    2023

  4. [12]

    author author S. J. \ Prentice , author K. Maguire , author S. J. \ Smartt , author M. R. \ Magee , author P. Schady , author S. Sim , author T. W. \ Chen , author P. Clark , author C. Colin , author M. Fulton , author O. McBrien , author D. O'Neill , author K. W. \ Smith , au...

    arXiv

  5. [13]

    author author A. Y. Q. \ Ho , author E. S. \ Phinney , author V. Ravi , author S. R. \ Kulkarni , author G. Petitpas , author B. Emonts , author V. Bhalerao , author R. Blundell , author S. B. \ Cenko , author D. Dobie , author R. Howie , author N. Kamraj , author M. M. \ Kasl...

    2019 arXiv

  6. [14]

    author author D. A. \ Perley , author P. A. \ Mazzali , author L. Yan , author S. B. \ Cenko , author S. Gezari , author K. Taggart , author N. Blagorodnova , author C. Fremling , author B. Mockler , \ and\ author A. Singh ,\ 10.1093/mnras/sty3420 journal journal \ volume 484 ...

    2019 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Margutti , author B

    author author R. Margutti , author B. D. \ Metzger , author R. Chornock , author I. Vurm , author N. Roth , author B. W. \ Grefenstette , author V. Savchenko , author R. Cartier , author J. F. \ Steiner , author G. Terreran , author B. Margalit , author G. Migliori , author D....

    2019 arXiv

  8. [16]

    author author A. Y. Q. \ Ho , author D. A. \ Perley , author A. Gal-Yam , author R. Lunnan , author J. Sollerman , author S. Schulze , author K. K. \ Das , author D. Dobie , author Y. Yao , author C. Fremling , author S. Adams , author S. Anand , author I. Andreoni , author E....

    2023 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Chen , author M

    author author Y. Chen , author M. R. \ Drout , author A. L. \ Piro , author C. D. \ Kilpatrick , author R. J. \ Foley , author C. Rojas-Bravo , \ and\ author M. R. \ Magee ,\ 10.3847/1538-4357/ace964 journal journal \ volume 955 ,\ eid 43 ( year 2023 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/...

    2023 arXiv

  10. [18]

    author author D. A. \ Perley , author A. Y. Q. \ Ho , author Y. Yao , author C. Fremling , author J. P. \ Anderson , author S. Schulze , author H. Kumar , author G. C. \ Anupama , author S. Barway , author E. C. \ Bellm , author V. Bhalerao , author T.-W. \ Chen , author D. A....

    2021 arXiv

  11. [19]

    author author A. J. \ Nayana \ and\ author P. Chandra ,\ 10.3847/2041-8213/abed55 journal journal \ volume 912 ,\ eid L9 ( year 2021 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.06008 arXiv:2103.06008 [astro-ph.HE] NoStop

    arXiv

  12. [20]

    author author A. Y. Q. \ Ho , author B. Margalit , author M. Bremer , author D. A. \ Perley , author Y. Yao , author D. Dobie , author D. L. \ Kaplan , author A. O'Brien , author G. Petitpas , \ and\ author A. Zic ,\ 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4e97 journal journal \ volume 932 ,\ eid...

    2022 arXiv

  13. [21]

    author author B. D. \ Metzger \ and\ author D. A. \ Perley ,\ 10.3847/1538-4357/acae89 journal journal \ volume 944 ,\ eid 74 ( year 2023 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.01819 arXiv:2210.01819 [astro-ph.HE] NoStop

    2023 arXiv

  14. [22]

    author author E. O. \ Ofek , author S. Ben-Ami , author D. Polishook , author E. Segre , author A. Blumenzweig , et al. ,\ 10.1088/1538-3873/acd8f0 journal journal \ volume 135 ,\ eid 065001 ( year 2023 a ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.04796 arXiv:2304.04796 [astro-ph.IM] NoStop

    2023 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Ben-Ami , author E

    author author S. Ben-Ami , author E. O. \ Ofek , author D. Polishook , author A. Franckowiak , author N. Hallakoun , et al. ,\ 10.48550/arXiv.2304.02719 journal journal arXiv e-prints \ ,\ eid arXiv:2304.02719 ( year 2023 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.02719 arXiv:2304.02719 [...

    2023 doi arXiv

  16. [24]

    author author E. C. \ Bellm , author S. R. \ Kulkarni , author M. J. \ Graham , author R. Dekany , author R. M. \ Smith , et al. ,\ 10.1088/1538-3873/aaecbe journal journal \ volume 131 ,\ pages 018002 ( year 2019 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1902.01932 arXiv:1902.01932 [astro-ph...

    2019 arXiv

  17. [25]

    author author M. J. \ Graham , author S. R. \ Kulkarni , author E. C. \ Bellm , author S. M. \ Adams , author C. Barbarino , author N. Blagorodnova , author D. Bodewits , author B. Bolin , author P. R. \ Brady , \ and\ author S. B. \ Cenko ,\ 10.1088/1538-3873/ab006c journal j...

    2019 arXiv

  18. [26]

    author author F. J. \ Masci , author R. R. \ Laher , author B. Rusholme , author D. L. \ Shupe , author S. Groom , author J. Surace , author E. Jackson , author S. Monkewitz , author R. Beck , \ and\ author D. Flynn ,\ 10.1088/1538-3873/aae8ac journal journal \ volume 131 ,\ p...

    2019 arXiv

  19. [27]

    author author A. Y. Q. \ Ho , author G. Srinivasaragavan , author D. Perley , author I. Andreoni , author N. Rehentulla , \ and\ author Y. Qin ,\ @noop journal journal Transient Name Server AstroNote \ volume 272 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024

  20. [28]

    Sfaradi , author R

    author author I. Sfaradi , author R. Margutti , author W. Farah , author E. Wiston , author N. A. \ J , author J. Bright , author R. Chornock , author N. LeBaron , author E. Hammerstein , author D. Brethauer , author T. Laskar , author A. Siemion , author A. Pollak , author S....

    2024

  21. [29]

    author author D. A. \ Perley , author Y. Qin , author R. M. \ Rich , author E. Daddi , author M. Collins , author P. Gatkine , author D. Neill , author K. Hinds , \ and\ author R. McGurk ,\ @noop journal journal Transient Name Server AstroNote \ volume 280 ,\ pages 1 ( year 20...

    2024

  22. [30]

    Schroeder , author A

    author author G. Schroeder , author A. Y. Q. \ Ho , \ and\ author D. A. \ Perley ,\ @noop journal journal Transient Name Server AstroNote \ volume 314 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024

  23. [31]

    Gehrels , author G

    author author N. Gehrels , author G. Chincarini , author P. Giommi , author K. O. \ Mason , author J. A. \ Nousek , author A. A. \ Wells , author N. E. \ White , author S. D. \ Barthelmy , author D. N. \ Burrows , \ and\ author L. R. \ Cominsky ,\ 10.1086/422091 journal journa...

    2004 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Srinivasaragavan , author A

    author author G. Srinivasaragavan , author A. Ho , author D. Perley , author I. Andreoni , author N. Rehentulla , author Y. Qin , \ and\ author E. Bellm ,\ @noop journal journal Transient Name Server AstroNote \ volume 276 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024

  25. [33]

    Margutti , author N

    author author R. Margutti , author N. A. \ J , author R. Chornock , author X. Guo , author N. LeBaron , author E. Wiston , author I. Sfaradi , author E. Hammerstein , author D. Brethauer , author H. Sears , author G. Migliori , author T. Laskar , author B. D. \ Metzger , autho...

    2024

  26. [34]

    Pursiainen , author T

    author author M. Pursiainen , author T. L. \ Killestein , author H. Kuncarayakti , author P. Charalampopoulos , author B. Warwick , author J. Lyman , author R. Kotak , author G. Leloudas , author D. Coppejans , author T. Kravtsov , author K. Maeda , author T. Nagao , author K....

    2025 arXiv

  27. [35]

    author author J. R. \ Maund , author P. A. \ H \"o flich , author I. A. \ Steele , author Y. Yang , author K. Wiersema , author S. Kobayashi , author N. Jordana-Mitjans , author C. Mundell , author A. Gomboc , author C. Guidorzi , \ and\ author R. J. \ Smith ,\ 10.1093/mnras/s...

    2023 arXiv

  28. [36]

    author author E. O. \ Ofek , author Y. Shvartzvald , author A. Sharon , author C. Tishler , author D. Elhanati , et al. ,\ 10.1088/1538-3873/ad0977 journal journal \ volume 135 ,\ eid 124502 ( year 2023 b ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.13063 arXiv:2310.13063 [astro-ph.IM] NoStop

    2023 arXiv

  29. [37]

    author author E. O. \ Ofek \ and\ author S. Ben-Ami ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv e-prints \ ,\ eid arXiv:2011.04674 ( year 2020 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.04674 arXiv:2011.04674 [astro-ph.IM] NoStop

    2011 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Zackay \ and\ author E

    author author B. Zackay \ and\ author E. O. \ Ofek ,\ 10.3847/1538-4357/836/2/187 journal journal \ volume 836 ,\ eid 187 ( year 2017 a ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.06872 arXiv:1512.06872 [astro-ph.IM] NoStop

    2017 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Prusti , author J

    author author Gaia Collaboration , author T. Prusti , author J. H. J. \ de Bruijne , author A. G. A. \ Brown , author A. Vallenari , author C. Babusiaux , author C. A. L. \ Bailer-Jones , author U. Bastian , author M. Biermann , author D. W. \ Evans , author L. Eyer , author F...

    2016 arXiv

  32. [40]

    author author Gaia Collaboration ,\ @noop journal journal VizieR Online Data Catalog \ ,\ eid I/355 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022

  33. [41]

    Zackay , author E

    author author B. Zackay , author E. O. \ Ofek , \ and\ author A. Gal-Yam ,\ 10.3847/0004-637X/830/1/27 journal journal \ volume 830 ,\ eid 27 ( year 2016 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1601.02655 arXiv:1601.02655 [astro-ph.IM] NoStop

    2016 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Springer , author E

    author author O. Springer , author E. O. \ Ofek , author B. Zackay , author R. Konno , author A. Sharon , author G. Nir , author A. Rubin , author A. Haddad , author J. Friedman , author L. Schein Lubomirsky , author I. Aizenberg , author A. Krassilchtchikov , \ and\ author A....

    2024 doi arXiv

  35. [43]

    Corbett , author N

    author author H. Corbett , author N. M. \ Law , author A. V. \ Soto , author W. S. \ Howard , author A. Glazier , author R. Gonzalez , author J. K. \ Ratzloff , author N. Galliher , author O. Fors , \ and\ author R. Quimby ,\ 10.3847/2041-8213/abbee5 journal journal \ volume 9...

    arXiv

  36. [44]

    Nir , author E

    author author G. Nir , author E. O. \ Ofek , author S. Ben-Ami , author N. Segev , author D. Polishook , \ and\ author I. Manulis ,\ 10.1093/mnras/stab1437 journal journal \ volume 505 ,\ pages 2477 ( year 2021 a ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.03497 arXiv:2011.03497 [astro-ph....

    2021 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Nir , author E

    author author G. Nir , author E. O. \ Ofek , \ and\ author A. Gal-Yam ,\ 10.3847/2515-5172/abe540 journal journal Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society \ volume 5 ,\ eid 27 ( year 2021 b ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.04466 arXiv:2102.04466 [astro-ph.HE] NoStop

    2021 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Zackay \ and\ author E

    author author B. Zackay \ and\ author E. O. \ Ofek ,\ 10.3847/1538-4357/836/2/188 journal journal \ volume 836 ,\ eid 188 ( year 2017 b ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.06879 arXiv:1512.06879 [astro-ph.IM] NoStop

    2017 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Hinshaw , author D

    author author G. Hinshaw , author D. Larson , author E. Komatsu , author D. N. \ Spergel , author C. L. \ Bennett , author J. Dunkley , author M. R. \ Nolta , author M. Halpern , author R. S. \ Hill , author N. Odegard , author L. Page , author K. M. \ Smith , author J. L. \ W...

    2013 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Gehrels ,\ 10.1086/164079 journal journal \ volume 303 ,\ pages 336 ( year 1986 ) NoStop

    author author N. Gehrels ,\ 10.1086/164079 journal journal \ volume 303 ,\ pages 336 ( year 1986 ) NoStop

    1986 doi

  41. [49]

    G \"o g \"u S , author P

    author author E. G \"o g \"u S , author P. M. \ Woods , author C. Kouveliotou , author J. van Paradijs , author M. S. \ Briggs , author R. C. \ Duncan , \ and\ author C. Thompson ,\ 10.1086/312380 journal journal \ volume 526 ,\ pages L93 ( year 1999 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/...

    1999 arXiv

  42. [50]

    author author ZTF Team ,\ 10.26131/IRSA598 title Ztf lightcurves , \ ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    2025 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.