Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 92 references

Unveiling the Variability and Chemical Composition of AL Col

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read AL Col is a chemically peculiar Ap/Bp star: a 10.36-day rotation, a 0.62 dex helium deficiency, and rare-earth overabundances up to 5.2 dex.

desk verdict Solid rotation period and atmospheric parameters, but the headline REE abundances rest on an LTE analysis the paper itself shows to be violated. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.20681 v1 pith:2TSATIDB submitted 2025-08-28 astro-ph.SR

Surath C. Ghosh , Santosh Joshi , Samrat Ghosh , Athul Dileep , Otto Trust , Mrinmoy Sarkar , Jaime Andrés Rosales Guzmán , Nicolás Esteban Castro-Toledo
show 4 more authors
Oleg Malkov Harinder P. Singh Kefeng Tan Sarabjeet S. Bedi
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords chemicallypeculiarstarsAp/BpHe-weakrare-earthelementsstellarrotationstarspotsTESSphotometryhigh-resolutionspectroscopy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes AL Col (HD 46462) as a chemically peculiar star of the Ap/Bp type. TESS photometry reveals a stable 10.35733-day rotational modulation, and high-resolution HARPS spectroscopy yields T_eff = 13,814 K, log g = 4.09, and v sin i = 16 km/s. LTE spectral synthesis of 25 elements finds helium underabundant by 0.62 dex and rare-earth elements overabundant by up to 5.2 dex, while O II, Mg II, S II, and Ca II stay near solar. The authors read this abundance pattern as the signature of a magnetic chemically peculiar star with surface chemical spots, and they model the TESS light curve with three evolving spots to infer differential rotation. If right, AL Col becomes a benchmark object for linking chemical spots, rotation, and magnetic fields in upper-main-sequence stars.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing evidence is the surface abundance pattern obtained by fitting LTE synthetic spectra to the HARPS spectrum: near-solar O II, Mg II, S II, and Ca II, a helium deficit of 0.62 dex, and rare-earth overabundances up to 5.2 dex. This pattern is the classification signature of magnetic chemically peculiar Ap/Bp and He-weak stars. The rotation period (0.09655 d^-1 and its harmonics) from Fourier, wavelet, and autocorrelation analyses ties the pattern to surface spots, and the three-spot BASSMAN model connects the spots to the light curve's shape and evolution. The mechanism invoked to explain the pattern is atomic diffusion in a magnetically stabilized atmosphere, which levitates ra

What would settle it

Take a circular-polarization spectrum of AL Col in strong Fe II and rare-earth lines: a detected Zeeman signature with a coherent field geometry would support the magnetic Ap/Bp interpretation, while a null detection would falsify it. Separately, a non-LTE stratified abundance calculation that removes the Fe I/Fe II and Si II/Si III offsets and reduces the rare-earth excesses below roughly 2 dex would show that the reported chemical peculiarity is mostly a modeling artifact.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that AL Col is a moderately evolved magnetic Ap/Bp (chemically peculiar) star. On TESS short-cadence data, the dominant 0.09655 d^-1 frequency gives a rotation period of 10.35733 d, with harmonics that point to non-uniform surface spots; wavelet and autocorrelation analyses confirm the period and show that the primary signal is stable while harmonic amplitudes drift. The HARPS spectrum, modeled with LTE plane-parallel atmospheres, gives T_eff = 13,814 ± 400 K, log g = 4.09 ± 0.08, and v sin i = 16 ± 1 km/s. Abundances of 25 elements show near-solar O II, Mg II, S II, and Ca II, a 0.62 dex helium underabundance, and rare-earth overabundances (Y, Ce, Pr, Nd, Eu) up

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on the assumption that one homogeneous, plane-parallel atmosphere in LTE can describe the lines of all 25 elements; the paper itself reports 2.09 dex and 1.23 dex Fe and Si ionization imbalances, so if true departures from LTE or vertical stratification are that large, the helium deficit and rare-earth overabundances—and the Ap/Bp classification—could be modeling artifacts.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A detected magnetic field in AL Col would confirm the Ap/Bp classification and make the star a clean oblique-rotator and Zeeman-Doppler-imaging target.
  • The star's stable 10.36-day rotation period with drifting harmonic amplitudes makes it a useful probe of spot longevity and differential rotation in an upper-main-sequence star.
  • The 1.23 dex Si II/Si III and 2.09 dex Fe I/Fe II ionization imbalances, if confirmed as vertical stratification, would make AL Col a quantitative test case for atomic-diffusion models in A and B stars.
  • The H-R diagram position (4.2 M_sun, 0.12 Gyr) places AL Col just past the zero-age main sequence, allowing it to anchor evolutionary tracks for magnetic chemically peculiar stars.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because spot size and contrast are degenerate in single-band TESS photometry, the three-spot model is not unique; time-series spectroscopy across the rotation cycle could break this degeneracy and reveal whether the spots are chemical patches rather than temperature spots.
  • The SED-versus-spectroscopic temperature gap (11,750 vs 13,814 K), attributed by the authors to flux redistribution by chemical spots, predicts that SED-only temperatures for spotted CP stars are systematically low; a multi-star comparison of SED and spectroscopic T_eff would test that extension.
  • Applying the paper's cited non-LTE corrections would likely trim the rare-earth overabundances by about 0.1-0.15 dex and shift the helium deficit slightly, but would probably not erase the Ap/Bp signature; the helium shift could, however, change the precise He-weak classification.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes TESS short-cadence photometry, SED fitting, HARPS high-resolution spectroscopy, and BASSMAN spot modeling of the chemically peculiar star AL Col (HD 46462). It reports a robust rotational period of 10.35733 d from DFT, wavelet, and autocorrelation analyses; spectroscopic atmospheric parameters Teff = 13,814 ± 400 K, log g = 4.09 ± 0.08, and v sin i = 16 ± 1 km/s; LTE abundances for 25 elements, finding He underabundant by ~0.62 dex and REE overabundances up to 5.2 dex; and derives R = 3.74 ± 0.48 Rsun, M = 4.2 ± 0.2 Msun, and age 0.12 ± 0.01 Gyr. The star is classified as an Ap/Bp-type (CP2/CP4) star. Spot modeling suggests three evolving cool spots and possible differential rotation.

Significance. If the abundance result holds, AL Col would be a valuable addition to the small sample of magnetic chemically peculiar stars with long rotation periods and strong REE stratification, useful for testing diffusion models. The rotation-period determination is a genuine strength: three independent methods (DFT, wavelet, ACF) agree within uncertainties, and the harmonic structure is consistent with rotational modulation. The paper also provides a complete abundance table with line counts and errors, and it explicitly discusses limitations of the LTE homogeneous analysis. However, the central classification claim rests on LTE abundance measurements that the paper itself shows to be internally inconsistent by 1–2 dex between ionization stages, and the derived physical parameters depend on an extinction value that appears inconsistent with the tabulated color. These issues sharply limit the quantitative conclusions as currently stated.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.4, Table 2] The LTE abundance analysis produces large inter-ion discrepancies: Fe I vs Fe II (2.09 dex), Si II vs Si III (1.23 dex), Nd II vs Nd III (1.99 dex), Ce II vs Ce III (1.05 dex), Pr II vs Pr III (0.72 dex). The paper itself states these 'strongly point to departures from a simple LTE, homogeneous atmospheric model.' Yet Table 2 reports mean abundances per element and the abstract advertises 'REE over-abundances of up to 5.2 dex' and a He underabundance of 0.62 dex. Because different ions form at different optical depths in a stratified atmosphere, the reported means are not photospheric abundances. The NLTE corrections quoted in §7 (0.05–0.15 dex for REEs, 0.10–0.15 dex for He) are far smaller than the inter-ion spreads and do not include vertical stratification; they cannot reconcile these offsets. The central Ap/Bp classification based on the 5.2 dex REE enhancement is therefore not supp
  2. [§4.2 and §4.3, Table 3]
  3. [§5.1, Eq. (4)] The luminosity and radius rely on E(B−V) = 0.52 and distance d = 243 pc, yielding AV = 1.61 and log(L/Lsun) = 2.69. However, Table 3 lists B−V = −0.1 from SIMBAD. For a star with Teff ≈ 13,800 K, the intrinsic color is roughly (B−V)0 ≈ −0.2, so the observed B−V implies E(B−V) ≈ 0.1, not 0.52. If E(B−V) were 0.1, AV would be ~0.31, reducing log L by ~0.5 dex and R by ~25%, which would change the derived mass, age, and spot-model inputs. The manuscript must justify the adopted reddening, ideally by fitting the SED with extinction as a free parameter and by comparing with the tabulated photometry. This is a load-bearing issue for the physical parameters highlighted in the abstract.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] 'wavelengthrange' should be 'wavelength range'. Also, the abstract states 'REE over-abundances of up to 5.2 dex', while the Discussion (§7) says 'up to 6 dex'; please reconcile.
  2. [Eq. (2)] The phase-fold formula is garbled: it should be written as φ_i = 2π × frac((t_i − t_0)/P_rot) to be unambiguous.
  3. [Fig. 5 and §7] The middle panel is described as the Mg I triplet region, but the Discussion refers to 'the Fe line in the Mg triplet region'. Please specify which lines are being used for the v sin i measurement.
  4. [§4.4] The abundance grid of Tkachenko fixes v_mic = 2 km/s. The paper does not discuss how a different microturbulence would affect the derived abundances, especially for lines of Fe II and REEs. A brief sensitivity test would help.
  5. [§5.1] Reference [70] (Hubrig et al. 2000) is cited as the source of solar metallicity Z = 0.0152; this is not the standard reference for solar abundances or PARSEC's solar mixture. Please provide the correct citation (e.g., Bressan et al. 2012, or the original solar abundance source).
  6. [Table 4 and §6] The reduced χ² values of 4.42 and 5.89 are substantially above 1. The text states 'χ² > 1 suggests the presence of small-scale variations', but a reduced χ² of ~5 normally indicates a poor fit or underestimated noise. Please clarify whether the binned light curve or the 120-s data are used in the fit and how the noise is estimated.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: rotation period and abundances are derived independently from the data; the paper's self-acknowledged LTE limitations are a correctness concern, not a circularity.

full rationale

The paper does not contain a load-bearing step that reduces to its own inputs by construction or by self-citation. The rotation frequency is measured independently by DFT, wavelet, and ACF analyses, which agree with one another and with the external Bernhard et al. (2020) period; the spot model takes the rotation period as an input but does not claim to predict it. Atmospheric parameters (Teff = 13,814 K, log g = 4.09) are fitted to Balmer and metal lines using synthetic spectra, starting from but not fixed by the SED value. Abundances are likewise obtained by fitting LTE synthetic line profiles to the observed HARPS spectrum, with the Ap/Bp classification inferred from the resulting abundance pattern rather than used as an input. The paper's own statement that Fe I/Fe II (2.09 dex) and Si II/Si III (1.23 dex) offsets 'strongly point to departures from a simple LTE, homogeneous atmospheric model' is an explicit acknowledgment of a modeling limitation, not evidence that a fitted parameter was renamed a prediction. The self-citations (e.g., Dileep et al. 2025, ref. [61]) are peripheral and not load-bearing for the central claims, and the key external comparisons (e.g., Bernhard et al. rotation period, Glagolevskij radius) provide independent benchmarks. Therefore the core derivation chain is self-contained and not circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results are measurements, so the ledger holds the modeling choices those measurements depend on: a fixed microturbulence (2 km/s), an adopted extinction E(B-V)=0.52 that drives luminosity/radius/mass/age, an assumed solar-scaled grid, the LTE plane-parallel atmosphere assumption (flagged by the authors as violated by 1-2 dex ionization imbalances), the rigid-body rotation used for the inclination, the late-type empirical spot temperature relation applied to an early-type star, and the BASSMAN static-spot geometry. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Microturbulent velocity v_mic = 2 km/s
    Fixed by hand for spectral synthesis and abundance analysis (Sections 4.3 and 4.4); affects line broadening and derived abundances.
  • Color excess E(B-V) = 0.52
    Adopted from McEvoy et al. [73]; enters luminosity, radius, mass, and age via A_V = 1.61 (Section 5.1); if biased, bulk parameters shift.
  • Initial metallicity [M/H] = 0 (solar)
    Assumed solar metallicity as the starting model in pySME fitting (Section 4.3); the Tkachenko [60] grid is solar-scaled, limiting the search space.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption LTE holds for all abundance derivations
    Stated repeatedly (Sections 4.3, 4.4, 7); the paper itself notes departures (Fe I/Fe II offset 2.09 dex, Si II/Si III 1.23 dex) and quotes NLTE corrections of 0.05 to 0.3 dex.
  • domain assumption Plane-parallel 1D model atmospheres (ATLAS9) and the Tkachenko LTE grid are appropriate
    Used in pySME and BinMag analysis (Sections 4.3 and 4.4); no 3D or stratified abundance models are employed.
  • domain assumption Rigid-body rotation for the inclination estimate
    Section 5.2 and Section 7: inclination i ~ 60 deg is inferred from R and v sin i, assuming rigid-body rotation.
  • ad hoc to paper Empirical spot temperature contrast relation from late-type stars applies to an early-type star
    Equation (6) from Notsu et al. [78-80] is used to convert flux dip to spot area; the authors caution that BASSMAN was designed for late-type stars (Section 6).
  • domain assumption Spots are static, spherical, and co-rotating within each TESS sector
    Section 6 states BASSMAN assumes static spherical spots within a sector and only longitude changes due to rotation; differential rotation is inferred from sector-to-sector longitude shifts.
  • domain assumption Extinction law R_V = 3.1 and Gaia DR3 parallax distance are correct
    Section 5.1; distance 243 pc from Gaia 4.11 mas versus Hipparcos 2.93 mas (341 pc) listed in Table 3; this choice affects all bulk parameters.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Unveiling the Variability and Chemical Composition of AL Col." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2TSATIDB

@misc{pith2026250820681,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Unveiling the Variability and Chemical Composition of AL Col},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2TSATIDB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.20681}
}
abstract

Using \tess\ short-cadence (120\,s) SAP flux, we identified a rotational frequency of 0.09655\,$\mathrm{d}^{-1}$ ($P_\mathrm{rot}=10.35733$\,d). Wavelet analysis reveals that while the amplitudes of the harmonic components vary over time, the strength of the primary rotational frequency remains stable. A SED analysis of multi-band photometric data yields an effective temperature ($T_\mathrm{eff}$) of {11,750\,K.} %MDPI: Comma added for five digits in the whole text, please check. High-resolution spectroscopic observations covering wavelengthrange 4500--7000\,\AA\ provide refined estimates of \teff\, =\, 13,814\, $\pm$\, 400\,K, \logg\,=\, 4.09\, $\pm$\, 0.08\,dex, and \vsini\, =\, 16 $\pm$ 1\,\kms. Abundance analysis shows solar-like composition of O\,\textsc{ii}, Mg\,\textsc{ii}, S\,\textsc{ii}, and Ca\,\textsc{ii}, while helium is under-abundant by 0.62\,dex. Rare earth elements (REEs) exhibit over-abundances of up to 5.2\,dex, classifying the star as an Ap/Bp-type star. AL\,Col has a radius of $R = 3.74\,\pm\,0.48{\rm R_{\odot}}$, with its H--R diagram position estimating a mass of $M = 4.2\,\pm\,0.2{\rm M_{\odot}}$ and an age of $0.12\,\pm\,0.01$ Gyr, indicating that the star has slightly evolved from the main sequence. The \tess\ light curves were modeled using a three-evolving-spot configuration, suggesting the presence of differential rotation. This star is a promising candidate for future investigations of magnetic field diagnostics and the vertical stratification of chemical elements in its atmosphere.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.20681 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Phase-folded light curve of AL Col using a reference epoch of t0 = 2,458,471.6706 days (time corresponding to minimum brightness) and a rotation period of 10.35733 d. The data have been binned into 200 phase intervals to improve clarity and reveal the rotational variability. To identify the periodic components of the photometric variability, we performed a Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) of the combined TESS light … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. presents the resulting amplitude spectrum of the combined data. The most prominent peak is found at ν = 0.09655 d −1 , corresponding to a rotation period of Prot = 10.35733 d—consistent with the value reported by Bernhard et al. [39]. The detection of higher-order harmonics further supports the presence of non-uniform surface features modulating the light curve. The identified frequencies, amplitudes, phases, and SN… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. ( Top panels) : The left sub-panel displays the stellar light curve (time-series photometry), while the right sub-panel presents the corresponding Fourier amplitude spectrum, highlighting dominant periodicities. ( Middle panels): The left sub-panel shows the wavelet power spectrum (WPS), where black indicates the highest power and blue represents weaker signals. The red and yellow regions trace strong periodicities,… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Spectral energy distribution (SED) spanning the optical to infrared wavelengths. Colored dots represent observed fluxes in different photometric bands, as indicated in the legend. The solid gray line corresponds to the best-fitting theoretical model (Teff = 11,750 ± 12…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Cont [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison between the observed (black) and synthetic (red) spectra in three key regions: the Hβ (top panel), the Mg I triplet region (middle panel), and the Hα (bottom panel). The synthetic spectra were computed using the best-fitting atmospheric parameters. Parameter…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: A selected piece of the spectrum in a narrow range if the wavelength range is 4943 Å–4953 Å for the clear visibility. Lines of various ions are marked using BinMag6 interface. The observed and synthetic spectra are shown with black and red colors, respectively. The sha…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Graphical representation of the elemental abundances listed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: , where evolutionary tracks corresponding to stellar masses ranging from 3.2 to 4.8 M⊙, in increments of 0.4 M⊙, are overplotted. The position of the target aligns closely with the evolutionary track of 4.2 ± 0.2 M⊙, consistent with the mass estimate of M⋆ = 3.9 M⊙ rep…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Spot locations, sizes, and contrasts are illustrated using Aitoff projections for sectors 6 (left panel) and 7 (right panel). Dark regions indicate the presence of spots, and the strength of the spots has been scaled by the color map shown in the figures. 7. Discussion…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Magnetic Fields in B, (peculiar) A, and F stars recent results from MuSiCoS Data

    Lueftinger, T.; Wade, G.A.; Weiss, W.W. Magnetic Fields in B, (peculiar) A, and F stars recent results from MuSiCoS Data. In Proceedings of the EAS Publications Series ; Arnaud, J., Meunier, N., Eds.; EAS Publications Series; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2003; p. 249, Volume 9

    2003

  2. [2]

    The helium weak silicon star HR 7224

    Lehmann, H.; Tkachenko, A.; Fraga, L.; Tsymbal, V .; Mkrtichian, D.E. The helium weak silicon star HR 7224. II. Doppler Imaging analysis. Astron. Astrophys. 2007, 471, 941–949. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20077700

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20077700 2007

  3. [3]

    The chemically peculiar stars of the upper main sequence

    Preston, G.W. The chemically peculiar stars of the upper main sequence. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 1974, 12, 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.aa.12.090174.001353

    work page arXiv 1974

  4. [4]

    A note on the relation between magnetic fields and the lambda 5200 feature in helium weak-stars

    Maitzen, H.M. A note on the relation between magnetic fields and the lambda 5200 feature in helium weak-stars. Astron. Astrophys. 1984, 138, 493–494

    1984

  5. [5]

    The λ Bootis stars

    Paunzen, E. The λ Bootis stars. In Proceedings of the A-Star Puzzle ; Zverko, J., Ziznovsky, J., Adelman, S.J., Weiss, W.W., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2004; Volume 224, IAU Symposium, pp. 443–450. https://doi.org/10.1017/S17439 21304004867

    work page doi:10.1017/s17439 2004

  6. [6]

    Statistical Analysis of the New Catalogue of CP Stars

    Ghazaryan, S.; Alecian, G.; Hakobyan, A.A. Statistical Analysis of the New Catalogue of CP Stars. Commun. Byurakan Astrophys. Obs. 2018, 65, 223– 227. https://doi.org/10.52526/25792776-2018.2.2-223

    work page doi:10.52526/25792776-2018.2.2-223 2018

  7. [7]

    Weak magnetic fields in Ap/Bp stars

    Aurière, M.; Wade, G.A.; Silvester, J.; Lignières, F.; Bagnulo, S.; Bale, K.; Dintrans, B.; Donati, J.F.; Folsom, C.P .; Gruberbauer, M.; et al. Weak magnetic fields in Ap/Bp stars. Evidence for a dipole field lower limit and a tentative interpretation of the magnetic dichotomy. Astron. Astrophys. 2007, 475, 1053– 1065. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20078189

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078189 2007

  8. [8]

    The spots on Ap stars

    Kochukhov, O. The spots on Ap stars. In Proceedings of the Physics of Sun and Star Spots ; Prasad Choudhary, D., Strassmeier, K.G., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2011, Volume 273, IAU Symposium, pp. 249– 255. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1 743921311015328

    work page doi:10.1017/s1 2011

Show all 92 references
  1. [9]

    The incidence and properties of magnetic fields in early B-type stars

    Shultz, M.; Wade, G.A.; Alecian, E.; et al. The incidence and properties of magnetic fields in early B-type stars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2019, 490, 274– 296. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz2546. Galaxies 2025, 1, 0 19 of 22

    2019 doi

  2. [10]

    Fossil magnetic fields in stars: Origin and evolution

    Braithwaite, J.; Spruit, H.C. Fossil magnetic fields in stars: Origin and evolution. Proc. Int. Astron. Union 2014, 302, 338–347. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743921314002427

    2014 doi

  3. [11]

    Diffusion Processes in Peculiar a Stars

    Michaud, G. Diffusion Processes in Peculiar a Stars. Astrophys. J. 1970, 160, 641. https://doi.org/10.1086/150459

    1970 doi

  4. [12]

    Implications of Diffusion for the Surface Composition of A and B Stars

    Richer, J.; Michaud, G.; Turcotte, S. Implications of Diffusion for the Surface Composition of A and B Stars. ApJ 2005, 625, 548–556. https://doi.org/10.1086/429648

    2005 doi

  5. [13]

    Atomic Diffusion in Stars ; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015

    Michaud, G.; Alecian, G.; Richer, J. Atomic Diffusion in Stars ; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1 007/978-3-319-19854-5

    2015

  6. [14]

    and Villebrun, F

    Alecian, E. and Villebrun, F. and Grunhut, J. and Hussain, G. and Neiner, C. and Wade, G. A. Magnetism in intermediate-mass stars: From fossil fields to dynamo action. EAS Publications Series 2019, 82, 345–355. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019 EAS....82..345A

    2019

  7. [15]

    Stellar magnetic fields and rotation

    Babcock, H.W. Stellar magnetic fields and rotation. Observatory 1949, 69, 191–192

    1949

  8. [16]

    A Light Curve for the Magnetic Variable Star HD125248.Nature 1950, 165, 195

    Stibbs, D.W.N. A Light Curve for the Magnetic Variable Star HD125248.Nature 1950, 165, 195. https://doi.org/10.1038/165195a0

    1950 doi

  9. [17]

    Modelling the light variability of the Ap starϵ Ursae Majoris

    Shulyak, D.; Krtiˇ cka, J.; Mikulášek, Z.; Kochukhov, O.; Lüftinger, T. Modelling the light variability of the Ap starϵ Ursae Majoris. Astron. Astrophys. 2010, 524, A66. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201015094

    2010 doi

  10. [18]

    Zeeman Doppler imaging of magnetic Ap stars: A practical approach

    Kochukhov, O.; Wade, G.A.; Shulyak, D. Zeeman Doppler imaging of magnetic Ap stars: A practical approach. Astron. Astrophys. 2012, 542, A116. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201118758

    2012 doi

  11. [19]

    The discovery of 8.0-min radial velocity variations in the strongly magnetic cool Ap star HD154708, a new roAp star

    Kurtz, D.W.; Elkin, V .G.; Cunha, M.S.; Mathys, G.; Hubrig, S.; Wolff, B.; Savanov, I. The discovery of 8.0-min radial velocity variations in the strongly magnetic cool Ap star HD154708, a new roAp star. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2006, 372, 286–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1...

    2006

  12. [20]

    and Gruberbauer, M

    Saio, H. and Gruberbauer, M. and Weiss, W. W. and Matthews, J. M. and Ryabchikova, T. Pulsation models for the roAp star HD 134214 Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2012, 420, 283–290 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.420..283S

    2012

  13. [21]

    Asteroseismology of Pulsating Stars

    Joshi, S.; Joshi, Y.C. Asteroseismology of Pulsating Stars. J. Astrophys. Astron. 2015, 36, 33– 80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12036-0 15-9327-z

    2015 doi

  14. [22]

    TESS cycle 1 observations of roAp stars with 2-min cadence data

    Holdsworth, D.L.; Cunha, M.S.; Kurtz, D.W.; Antoci, V .; Hey, D.R.; Bowman, D.M.; Kobzar, O.; Buzasi, D.L.; Kochukhov, O.; Niemczura, E.; et al. TESS cycle 1 observations of roAp stars with 2-min cadence data. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2021, 506, 1073–

    2021

  15. [23]

    Asteroseismology Across the Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram

    Kurtz, D.W. Asteroseismology Across the Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2022, 60, 31–71. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-094232

    2022 doi

  16. [24]

    The Cape rapidly oscillating star survey-I

    Martinez, P .; Kurtz, D.W.; Kauffmann, G.M. The Cape rapidly oscillating star survey-I. First results.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1991, 250, 666. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/250.4.666

    1991 doi

  17. [25]

    The Naini Tal - Cape survey for pulsations in chemically peculiar A-type stars

    Martinez, P .; Kurtz, D.W.; Ashoka, B.N.; Chaubey, U.S.; Girish, V .; Gupta, S.K.; Joshi, S.; Kasturirangan, K.; Sagar, R.; Seetha, S. The Naini Tal - Cape survey for pulsations in chemically peculiar A-type stars. I. Methods and preliminary results. Astron. Astrophys. 2001, 3...

    2001 doi

  18. [26]

    Discovery of unusual pulsations in the cool, evolved Am stars HD 98851 and HD 102480

    Joshi, S.; Girish, V .; Sagar, R.; Kurtz, D.W.; Martinez, P .; Kumar, B.; Seetha, S.; Ashoka, B.N.; Zhou, A. Discovery of unusual pulsations in the cool, evolved Am stars HD 98851 and HD 102480. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2003, 344, 431– 438. https: //doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-871...

    2003

  19. [27]

    The Nainital-Cape Survey

    Joshi, S.; Mary, D.L.; Martinez, P .; Kurtz, D.W.; Girish, V .; Seetha, S.; Sagar, R.; Ashoka, B.N. The Nainital-Cape Survey. II. Report for pulsation in five chemically peculiar A-type stars and presentation of 140 null results. Astron. Astrophys. 2006, 455, 303– 313. https:/...

    2006 doi

  20. [28]

    The Nainital-Cape Survey

    Joshi, S.; Mary, D.L.; Chakradhari, N.K.; Tiwari, S.K.; Billaud, C. The Nainital-Cape Survey. III. A search for pulsational variability in chemically peculiar stars. Astron. Astrophys. 2009, 507, 1763– 1784. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200912382

    2009 doi

  21. [29]

    Time-resolved photometric and spectroscopic analysis of the luminous Ap star HD103498

    Joshi, S.; Ryabchikova, T.; Kochukhov, O.; Sachkov, M.; Tiwari, S.K.; Chakradhari, N.K.; Piskunov, N. Time-resolved photometric and spectroscopic analysis of the luminous Ap star HD103498. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2010, 401, 1299– 1307. https: //doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.20...

    2010

  22. [31]

    The Nainital-Cape Survey

    Joshi, S.; Martinez, P .; Chowdhury, S.; Chakradhari, N.K.; Joshi, Y.C.; van Heerden, P .; Medupe, T.; Kumar, Y.B.; Kuhn, R.B. The Nainital-Cape Survey. IV . A search for pulsational variability in 108 chemically peculiar stars.Astron. Astrophys. 2016, 590, A116. https://doi.o...

    2016 doi

  23. [32]

    High-resolution Spectroscopy and Spectropolarimetry of Selected δ-Sct Pulsating Variables

    Joshi, S.; Semenko, E.; Moiseeva, A.; Sharma, K.; Joshi, Y.C.; Sachkov, M.; Singh, H.P .; Yerra, B.K. High-resolution Spectroscopy and Spectropolarimetry of Selected δ-Sct Pulsating Variables. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2017, 467, 633– 645. https://doi.org/10.1 093/mnras/stx087...

    2017

  24. [33]

    Study of chemically peculiar stars–I

    Joshi, S.; Trust, O.; Semenko, E.; Williams, P .E.; Lampens, P .; De Cat, P .; Vermeylen, L.; Holdsworth, D.L.; García, R.A.; Mathur, S.; et al. Study of chemically peculiar stars–I. High-resolution spectroscopy and K2 photometry of Am stars in the region of M44. Mon. Not. R. ...

    2022 doi

  25. [34]

    and Neiner, C

    Buysschaert, B. and Neiner, C. and Martin, A. J. and Oksala, M. E. and Aerts, C. and Tkachenko, A. and Alecian, E. and MiMeS Collaboration Magnetic characterization and variability study of the magnetic SPB star o Lupi Astron. Astrophys. 2019, 622,A67. https://ui.adsabs.harvar...

    2019

  26. [35]

    Holdsworth, D L and Cunha, M S and Lares-Martiz, M and Kurtz, D W and Antoci, V and Barceló Forteza, S and De Cat, P and Derekas, A and Kayhan, C and Ozuyar, D TESS Cycle 2 observations of roAp stars with 2-min cadence data. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2023, 527, 9548–9580. http...

    2023 doi

  27. [36]

    Magnetic chemically peculiar stars in the TESS era: Rotation and magnetic field from photometry and spectroscopy

    Bagnulo, S.; Landstreet, J.D.; Power, J.; et al. Magnetic chemically peculiar stars in the TESS era: Rotation and magnetic field from photometry and spectroscopy. Astron. Astrophys. 2023, 671, A154. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202245820

    2023 doi

  28. [37]

    The MiMeS survey of magnetism in massive stars: Introduction and overview

    Wade, G.A.; Alecian, E.; Grunhut, J.H.; et al. The MiMeS survey of magnetism in massive stars: Introduction and overview. Proc. Int. Astron. Union 2014, 302, 265–270. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743921314002440

    2014 doi

  29. [38]

    Magnetism in Ap/Bp stars with rotational periods longer than 100 d

    Sikora, J.; Wade, G.A.; Power, J. Magnetism in Ap/Bp stars with rotational periods longer than 100 d. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2020, 499, 5049–5068. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3149

    2020 doi

  30. [39]

    New and improved rotational periods of magnetic CP stars from ASAS-3, KELT, and MASCARA data

    Bernhard, K.; Hümmerich, S.; Paunzen, E. New and improved rotational periods of magnetic CP stars from ASAS-3, KELT, and MASCARA data. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2020, 493, 3293– 3330. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa462

    2020 doi

  31. [40]

    Lightkurve: Kepler and TESS Time Series Analysis in Python ; Astrophysics Source Code Library (ascl: 1812.013): 2018

    Lightkurve Collaboration; Cardoso, J.; Hedges, C.; Gully-Santiago, M.; Saunders, N.; Cody, A.; Barclay, T.; Hall, O.; Sagear, S.; Turtelboom, E.; et al. Lightkurve: Kepler and TESS Time Series Analysis in Python ; Astrophysics Source Code Library (ascl: 1812.013): 2018

    2018

  32. [41]

    Period04 User Guide

    Lenz, P .; Breger, M. Period04 User Guide. CoAst 2005, 146, 53–136. https://doi.org/10.1553/cia146s53

    2005 doi

  33. [42]

    A Detection Threshold in the Amplitude Spectra Calculated from TESS Time-Series Data

    Baran, A.S.; Koen, C. A Detection Threshold in the Amplitude Spectra Calculated from TESS Time-Series Data. Acta Astron. 2021, 71, 113– 121. https://doi.org/10.32023/0001-5237/71.2.3

    2021 doi

  34. [43]

    Wavelets: A powerful tool for studying rotation, activity, and pulsation in Kepler and CoRoT stellar light curves

    Bravo, J.P .; Roque, S.; Estrela, R.; Leão, I.C.; De Medeiros, J.R. Wavelets: A powerful tool for studying rotation, activity, and pulsation in Kepler and CoRoT stellar light curves. Astron. Astrophys. 2014, 568, A34. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/2013 23032

    2014 doi

  35. [44]

    A.; Ballot, J.; Ceillier, T.; Salabert, D.; Metcalfe, T

    Mathur, S.; García, R. A.; Ballot, J.; Ceillier, T.; Salabert, D.; Metcalfe, T. S.; Régulo, C.; Jiménez, A.; Bloemen, S. Magnetic activity of F stars observed by Kepler. Astron. Astrophys. 2014, 562, A124. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201322707

    2014 doi

  36. [45]

    The VizieR database of astronomical catalogues.Astron

    Ochsenbein, F.; Bauer, P .; Marcout, J. The VizieR database of astronomical catalogues.Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 2000, 143, 23–

    2000

  37. [46]

    A new catalogue of Strömgren-Crawford uvby β photometry

    Paunzen, E. A new catalogue of Strömgren-Crawford uvby β photometry. Astron. Astrophys. 2015, 580, A23. https: //doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201526413

    2015 doi

  38. [47]

    https://doi.org/10.1051/aas:2000169

    doi

  39. [48]

    Gaia Data Release 3: The Galaxy in your preferred colours

    Gaia Collaboration; Montegriffo, P .; Bellazzini, M.; De Angeli, F.; Andrae, R.; Barstow, M.A.; Bossini, D.; Bragaglia, A.; Burgess, P .W.; Cacciari, C.; et al. Gaia Data Release 3: The Galaxy in your preferred colours. Synthetic photometry from Gaia low-resolution spectra. ar...

    2022 arXiv

  40. [49]

    Construction and verification of the Tycho-2 Catalogue

    Høg, E.; Fabricius, C.; Makarov, V .V .; Bastian, U.; Schwekendiek, P .; Wicenec, A.; Urban, S.; Corbin, T.; Wycoff, G. Construction and verification of the Tycho-2 Catalogue. Astron. Astrophys. 2000, 357, 367–386

    2000

  41. [50]

    The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS)

    Skrutskie, M.F.; Cutri, R.M.; Stiening, R.; Weinberg, M.D.; Schneider, S.; Carpenter, J.M.; Beichman, C.; Capps, R.; Chester, T.; Elias, J.; et al. The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS). Astron. J. 2006, 131, 1163–1183. https://doi.org/10.1086/498708

    2006 doi

  42. [51]

    The Gaia mission

    Gaia Collaboration.; Prusti, T.; de Bruijne, J.H.J.; Brown, A.G.A.; Vallenari, A.; Babusiaux, C.; Bailer-Jones, C.A.L.; Bastian, U.; Biermann, M.; Evans, D.W.; et al. The Gaia mission. Astron. Astrophys. 2016, 595, A1. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/2016 29272

    2016 doi

  43. [52]

    An absolute calibration of DENIS (deep near infrared southern sky survey)

    Fouqué, P .; Chevallier, L.; Cohen, M.; Galliano, E.; Loup, C.; Alard, C.; de Batz, B.; Bertin, E.; Borsenberger, J.; Cioni, M.R.; et al. An absolute calibration of DENIS (deep near infrared southern sky survey). Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 2000, 141, 313–317. https://doi.o...

    doi

  44. [53]

    The Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE): Mission Description and Initial On-orbit Performance

    Wright, E.L.; Eisenhardt, P .R.M.; Mainzer, A.K.; Ressler, M.E.; Cutri, R.M.; Jarrett, T.; Kirkpatrick, J.D.; Padgett, D.; McMillan, R.S.; Skrutskie, M.; et al. The Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE): Mission Description and Initial On-orbit Performance. Astron. J. 201...

    2010 doi

  45. [54]

    Initial Performance of the NEOWISE Reactivation Mission

    Mainzer, A.; Bauer, J.; Cutri, R.M.; Grav, T.; Masiero, J.; Beck, R.; Clarkson, P .; Conrow, T.; Dailey, J.; Eisenhardt, P .; et al. Initial Performance of the NEOWISE Reactivation Mission. Astrophys. J. 2014, 792, 30. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/792/1/30

    2014 doi

  46. [55]

    A preliminary database of DENIS point sources

    Epchtein, N.; Deul, E.; Derriere, S.; Borsenberger, J.; Egret, D.; Simon, G.; Alard, C.; Balázs, L.G.; de Batz, B.; Cioni, M.R.; et al. A preliminary database of DENIS point sources. Astron. Astrophys. 1999, 349, 236–242

    1999

  47. [56]

    PySME: Spectroscopy Made Easier

    Wehrhahn, A.; Piskunov, N.; Ryabchikova, T. PySME: Spectroscopy Made Easier. Astron. Astrophys. 2023, 671, A171. https: //doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202244482. Galaxies 2025, 1, 0 21 of 22

    2023 doi

  48. [57]

    VALD3: Current developments

    Pakhomov, Y.; Piskunov, N.; Ryabchikova, T. VALD3: Current developments. arXiv 2017, arXiv:1710.10854

    2017 arXiv

  49. [58]

    The chemical make-up of the Sun: A 2020 vision

    Asplund, M.; Amarsi, A.M.; Grevesse, N. The chemical make-up of the Sun: A 2020 vision. Astron. Astrophys. 2021, 653, A141. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202140445

    2020 doi

  50. [59]

    New Grids of ATLAS9 Model Atmospheres

    Castelli, F.; Kurucz, R.L. New Grids of ATLAS9 Model Atmospheres. arXiv 2004, arXiv:astro-ph/0405087

    2004 arXiv

  51. [60]

    Grid search in stellar parameters: A software for spectrum analysis of single stars and binary systems

    Tkachenko, A. Grid search in stellar parameters: A software for spectrum analysis of single stars and binary systems. Astron. Astrophys. 2015, 581, A129. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201526513

    2015 doi

  52. [61]

    BinMag: Widget for Comparing Stellar Observed with Theoretical Spectra ; Astrophysics Source Code Library: , 2018; p

    Kochukhov, O. BinMag: Widget for Comparing Stellar Observed with Theoretical Spectra ; Astrophysics Source Code Library: , 2018; p. ascl–1805

    2018

  53. [62]

    Non-LTE line formation for Fe and Ca in late-type stars–I

    Mashonkina, L.; Gehren, T.; Shi, J.R.; Korn, A.J.; Grupp, F. Non-LTE line formation for Fe and Ca in late-type stars–I. Statistical equilibrium of neutral and singly-ionised species. Astron. Astrophys. 2011, 528, A87

    2011

  54. [63]

    Chemical abundances and doppler imaging of the Ap Si/He-wk star HD 100357

    Dileep, A.; Joshi, S.; Alexeeva, S.; Kochukhov, O.; Semenko, E.; De Cat, P .; Zúñiga-Fernández, S.; Trust, O.; Pollard, K.; Crause, L.; et al. Chemical abundances and doppler imaging of the Ap Si/He-wk star HD 100357. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2025, staf1247. https://doi.org/1...

    2025 doi

  55. [64]

    Vertical abundance stratification in peculiar A-type stars: Silicon in 10 Aql.Astron

    Ryabchikova, T.; Leone, F.; Kochukhov, O. Vertical abundance stratification in peculiar A-type stars: Silicon in 10 Aql.Astron. Astrophys. 2005, 438, 973

    2005

  56. [65]

    Non-LTE line-formation for hydrogen and helium in early-type stars—II

    Przybilla, N.; Butler, K.; Becker, S.R.; Kudritzki, R.P .; Venn, K.A. Non-LTE line-formation for hydrogen and helium in early-type stars—II. The line spectrum of the B8 IV star HD 160762. Astron. Astrophys. 2001, 369, 1009

    2001

  57. [66]

    Discovery of a Magnetic Field in the Rapidly Oscillating Ap Star HD 99563

    Kochukhov, O.; Ryabchikova, T.; Weiss, W.W.; Piskunov, N. Discovery of a Magnetic Field in the Rapidly Oscillating Ap Star HD 99563. Nature 2007, 450, 633

    2007

  58. [67]

    Stratification and Non-LTE Effects in the Slowly Rotating Ap Star BD +00°1659

    Romanovskaya, E.V .; Kochukhov, O.; Ryabchikova, T. Stratification and Non-LTE Effects in the Slowly Rotating Ap Star BD +00°1659. Astron. Astrophys. 2024, 670, A45

    2024

  59. [68]

    Newsletter on Analysis of Astronomical Spectra, No

    Butler, K.; Giddings, J. Newsletter on Analysis of Astronomical Spectra, No. 9 ; Technical Report; University of London: London, UK, 1985

    1985

  60. [69]

    Non-LTE line-blanketed model atmospheres of hot stars

    Hubeny, I.; Lanz, T. Non-LTE line-blanketed model atmospheres of hot stars. 1: Hybrid complete linearization/accelerated lambda iteration method. Astrophys. J. 1995, 439, 875

    1995

  61. [70]

    Magnetic AP Stars in the Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram

    Hubrig, S.; North, P .; Mathys, G. Magnetic AP Stars in the Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram. Astrophys. J. 2000, 539, 352–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/309189

    2000 doi

  62. [71]

    PARSEC: Stellar tracks and isochrones with the PAdova and TRieste Stellar Evolution Code

    Bressan, A.; Marigo, P .; Girardi, L.; Salasnich, B.; Dal Cero, C.; Rubele, S.; Nanni, A. PARSEC: Stellar tracks and isochrones with the PAdova and TRieste Stellar Evolution Code. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2012, 427, 127– 145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2 966.2012.21948.x

    2012

  63. [72]

    Gaia Early Data Release 3

    Gaia Collaboration.; Brown, A.G.A.; Vallenari, A.; Prusti, T.; de Bruijne, J.H.J.; Babusiaux, C.; Biermann, M.; Creevey, O.L.; Evans, D.W.; Eyer, L.; et al. Gaia Early Data Release 3. Summary of the contents and survey properties. Astron. Astrophys. 2021, 649, A1. https://doi....

    2021 doi

  64. [73]

    On the Use of Empirical Bolometric Corrections for Stars

    Torres, G. On the Use of Empirical Bolometric Corrections for Stars. Astron. J. 2010, 140, 1158– 1162. https://doi.org/10.1088/00 04-6256/140/5/1158

    2010 doi

  65. [74]

    On Properties of Main Sequence Magnetic Stars.Astrophys

    Glagolevskij, Y.V . On Properties of Main Sequence Magnetic Stars.Astrophys. Bull. 2019, 74, 66–79. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1 990341319010073

    2019 doi

  66. [75]

    Early-type stars observed in the ESO UVES Paranal Observatory Project - V

    McEvoy, C.M.; Smoker, J.V .; Dufton, P .L.; Smith, K.T.; Kennedy, M.B.; Keenan, F.P .; Lambert, D.L.; Welty, D.E.; Lauroesch, J.T. Early-type stars observed in the ESO UVES Paranal Observatory Project - V . Time-variable interstellar absorption.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2015, ...

    2015 doi

  67. [76]

    Validation of the new Hipparcos reduction

    van Leeuwen, F. Validation of the new Hipparcos reduction. Astron. Astrophys. 2007, 474, 653– 664. https://doi.org/10.1051/00 04-6361:20078357

    2007 doi

  68. [77]

    New Generation Stellar Spectral Libraries in the Optical and Near-infrared

    Borisov, S.B.; Chilingarian, I.V .; Rubtsov, E.V .; Ledoux, C.; Melo, C.; Grishin, K.A.; Katkov, I.Y.; Goradzhanov, V .S.; Afanasiev, A.V .; Kasparova, A.V .; et al. New Generation Stellar Spectral Libraries in the Optical and Near-infrared. I. The Recalibrated UVES-POP Librar...

    2023 doi

  69. [78]

    Superflares on Solar-type Stars Observed with Kepler II

    Notsu, Y.; Shibayama, T.; Maehara, H.; Notsu, S.; Nagao, T.; Honda, S.; Ishii, T.T.; Nogami, D.; Shibata, K. Superflares on Solar-type Stars Observed with Kepler II. Photometric Variability of Superflare-generating Stars: A Signature of Stellar Rotation and Starspots. Astrophy...

    2013 doi

  70. [79]

    Starspot Modeling and Flare Analysis on Selected Main-sequence M-type Stars

    Bicz, K.; Falewicz, R.; Pietras, M.; Siarkowski, M.; Pre´ s, P . Starspot Modeling and Flare Analysis on Selected Main-sequence M-type Stars. Astrophys. J. 2022, 935, 102. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac7ab3

    2022 doi

  71. [80]

    Do Kepler Superflare Stars Really Include Slowly Rotating Sun-like Stars?—Results Using APO 3.5 m Telescope Spectroscopic Observations and Gaia-DR2 Data

    Notsu, Y.; Maehara, H.; Honda, S.; Hawley, S.L.; Davenport, J.R.A.; Namekata, K.; Notsu, S.; Ikuta, K.; Nogami, D.; Shibata, K. Do Kepler Superflare Stars Really Include Slowly Rotating Sun-like Stars?—Results Using APO 3.5 m Telescope Spectroscopic Observations and Gaia-DR2 D...

    2019 doi

  72. [81]

    Can Superflares Occur on Our Sun? Publ

    Shibata, K.; Isobe, H.; Hillier, A.; Choudhuri, A.R.; Maehara, H.; Ishii, T.T.; Shibayama, T.; Notsu, S.; Notsu, Y.; Nagao, T.; et al. Can Superflares Occur on Our Sun? Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 2013, 65, 49. https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/65.3.49

    2013 doi

  73. [82]

    The overall flux distribution of magnetic chemically peculiar stars

    Leone, F.; Catalano, F.A. The overall flux distribution of magnetic chemically peculiar stars. Astron. Astrophys. 1991, 242, 199

    1991

  74. [83]

    The Information Content in Analytic Spot Models of Broadband Precision Light Curves

    Walkowicz, L.M.; Basri, G.; Valenti, J.A. The Information Content in Analytic Spot Models of Broadband Precision Light Curves. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 2013, 205, 17. https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/205/2/17

    2013 doi

  75. [84]

    Non-LTE line formation for neutral helium in early-type stars

    Przybilla, N. Non-LTE line formation for neutral helium in early-type stars. Astron. Astrophys. 2005, 443, 293–303. https: //doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20053570

    2005 doi

  76. [85]

    Discovery of secular variations in the atmospheric abundances of magnetic Ap stars

    Bailey, J.D.; Landstreet, J.D.; Bagnulo, S. Discovery of secular variations in the atmospheric abundances of magnetic Ap stars. Astron. Astrophys. 2014, 561, A147. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201322853

    2014 doi

  77. [86]

    Non-LTE line formation of Fe in late-type stars—I

    Lind, K.; Bergemann, M.; Asplund, M. Non-LTE line formation of Fe in late-type stars—I. Standard stars with 1D and 3D model atmospheres. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2012, 427, 50– 60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21687.x

    2012

  78. [87]

    Present-day cosmic abundances: A comprehensive study of nearby early B-type stars

    Nieva, M.F.; Przybilla, N. Present-day cosmic abundances: A comprehensive study of nearby early B-type stars. Astron. Astrophys. 2012, 539, A143. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201118158

    2012 doi

  79. [88]

    Non-LTE line formation for Sii–iii in A–B stars and the origin of Siii emission in iota Her

    Sitnova, T.N.; Mashonkina, L.I.; Pakhomov, Y.V . Non-LTE line formation for Sii–iii in A–B stars and the origin of Siii emission in iota Her. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2020, 493, 6095–6108. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa598

    2020 doi

  80. [89]

    Non-LTE abundance determinations for silicon in A–B-type stellar atmospheres

    Mashonkina, L.I.; Sitnova, T.N.; Pakhomov, Y.V . Non-LTE abundance determinations for silicon in A–B-type stellar atmospheres. Astron. Lett. 2016, 42, 606–617. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063773716080034

    2016 doi

  81. [90]

    A database of rare-earth element line data and its application to Ap-star spectra

    Ryabchikova, T.; Piskunov, N.; Kurucz, R.L. A database of rare-earth element line data and its application to Ap-star spectra. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2015, 447, 2046–2055. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu2575

    2015 doi

  82. [91]

    NLTE ionisation equilibrium of NdII and Nd III in cool A and Ap stars

    Mashonkina, L.; Ryabchikova, T.; Ryabtsev, A. NLTE ionisation equilibrium of NdII and Nd III in cool A and Ap stars. Astron. Astrophys. 2005, 441, 309–318. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20053085

    2005 doi

  83. [93]

    Abundances determined using Si II and Si III in B-type stars: evidence for stratification

    Bailey, J.D.; Landstreet, J.D. Abundances determined using Si II and Si III in B-type stars: evidence for stratification. Astron. Astrophys. 2013, 551, A30. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201220671. Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in...

    2013 doi

  84. [1110]

    https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab1578

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.