pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.00533 · v2 · pith:HWJ4AFBGnew · submitted 2025-08-30 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas

Josephson Dynamics in 2D Ring-shaped Condensates

Koon Siang Gan , Vijay Pal Singh , Luigi Amico , Rainer Dumke This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 20:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas
keywords Josephson transportring Bose-Einstein condensatevortex-antivortex pairssuperfluid circuitatomtronicsoptical weak linksphase-locked condensate
0
0 comments X

The pith

A ring-shaped Bose-Einstein condensate with two movable optical barriers supports a dc Josephson current up to a critical value before vortex pairs trigger dissipation while preserving global phase locking.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines Josephson transport inside a fully closed two-dimensional ring of ultracold rubidium atoms. Two optical barriers function as weak links that are translated at chosen speeds to drive a steady bias current around the ring. The resulting current-chemical-potential curve shows a clear dc branch that ends at a critical current of 9(1) times 10 to the 3 per second. Above this point the circuit enters a resistive regime whose dissipation arises from vortex-antivortex pairs crossing the barriers. The bulk of the condensate stays phase-locked because the ring topology requires the circulation to remain quantized.

Core claim

In a fully closed two-dimensional superfluid circuit formed by a ring-shaped 87Rb Bose-Einstein condensate that contains two optical barriers acting as movable weak links, translating these barriers at controlled speeds imposes a steady bias current that enables direct mapping of the current-chemical-potential characteristics. For narrow junctions the circuit exhibits a pronounced dc branch that terminates at a critical current Ic equals 9(1) times 10 to the 3 per second; above this threshold the system switches to an ac resistive regime with dissipation mediated by the nucleation and traversal of vortex-antivortex pairs while the bulk condensate remains globally phase-locked.

What carries the argument

Two optical barriers translated as movable weak links inside a topologically closed ring condensate, which impose bias current and permit vortex-antivortex pairs to cross the junctions while the bulk stays phase-locked.

If this is right

  • The setup functions as a cold-atom analogue of a SQUID in which single-vortex events become directly observable.
  • Classical-field simulations that include the moving barriers reproduce both the nonlinear current-chemical-potential curve and the measured critical current.
  • The ring topology enforces quantized circulation even after the junctions enter the resistive state.
  • The platform opens routes to atomtronic circuit elements, non-reciprocal Josephson devices, and on-chip Sagnac interferometers.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The moving-barrier technique could be adapted to other closed geometries to create tunable weak links without physical contact.
  • Scaling the ring size might allow tests of multi-vortex interference effects while keeping the topological protection intact.
  • Similar circuits could serve as compact rotation sensors that rely on the superfluid phase rather than mechanical components.

Load-bearing premise

The two optical barriers can be moved to impose a steady bias current without breaking the ring's topological constraint that forces quantized circulation.

What would settle it

Direct imaging that shows no vortex-antivortex pairs crossing the junctions during the resistive regime would falsify the claimed dissipation mechanism.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.00533 by Koon Siang Gan, Luigi Amico, Rainer Dumke, Vijay Pal Singh.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Superfluid-resistive regimes. (a) Simulation of a homogeneous 2D ring condensate consisting of two mobile tunnel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Dissipation mechanism. Time evolution of the phase [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Relative vortex number ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate Josephson transport in a fully closed, two-dimensional superfluid circuit formed by a ring-shaped 87Rb Bose-Einstein condensate that contains two optical barriers acting as movable weak links. Translating these barriers at controlled speeds imposes a steady bias current, enabling direct mapping of the current-chemical-potential (I-{\Delta}{\mu}) characteristics. For narrow junctions (w \approx 1{\mu}m) the circuit exhibits a pronounced dc branch that terminates at a critical current I_c = 9(1) x 10^3 s^{-1}; above this threshold the system switches to an ac, resistive regime. Classical-field simulations that include the moving barriers quantitatively reproduce both the nonlinear I-{\Delta}{\mu} curve and the measured I_c, validating the underlying microscopic picture. Analysis of the ensuing phase dynamics shows that dissipation is mediated by the nucleation and traversal of vortex-antivortex pairs through the junctions, while the bulk condensate remains globally phase-locked \textemdash direct evidence of the ring's topological constraint enforcing quantized circulation. These results establish a cold-atom analogue of a SQUID in which Josephson dynamics can be resolved at the single-vortex level, providing a versatile platform for atomtronic circuit elements, non-reciprocal Josephson devices, and on-chip Sagnac interferometers for multi-axis rotation sensing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates Josephson transport in a fully closed 2D ring-shaped 87Rb BEC containing two movable optical barriers that act as weak links. Translating the barriers at controlled speeds imposes a steady bias current, allowing measurement of the nonlinear I-Δμ characteristics. For narrow junctions (w ≈ 1 μm) a dc branch is observed that terminates at Ic = 9(1) × 10^3 s^{-1}; above this threshold the system enters an ac resistive regime. Classical-field simulations that incorporate the moving barriers quantitatively reproduce both the I-Δμ curve and the measured Ic. Phase-dynamics analysis indicates that dissipation occurs via nucleation and traversal of vortex-antivortex pairs localized at the junctions while the bulk condensate remains globally phase-locked, providing direct evidence that the ring topology enforces quantized circulation. The results are presented as a cold-atom SQUID analogue with single-vortex resolution.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work establishes a versatile platform for atomtronic circuit elements and on-chip Sagnac interferometers. A notable strength is the quantitative agreement between experiment and classical-field simulations that explicitly include the moving barriers; this provides independent validation of the microscopic vortex-pair mechanism. The reported preservation of global phase-locking in the bulk directly addresses the topological-constraint requirement and supplies falsifiable evidence for the SQUID interpretation.

major comments (1)
  1. [Phase-dynamics analysis section] The central claim that dissipation is mediated by junction-localized vortex-antivortex pairs while the bulk remains globally phase-locked (and therefore that the ring topology is preserved) is load-bearing for the SQUID analogue. The manuscript should provide an explicit, quantitative check—e.g., time-resolved integration of the phase gradient around a closed contour in the bulk or direct computation of the winding number in the simulations—to rule out barrier-induced net circulation changes. Without this, the mapping from barrier speed to bias current rests on an unverified assumption.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Experimental methods] Clarify the precise definition of the bias current I in terms of barrier velocity and condensate density; any implicit assumptions about density uniformity should be stated explicitly.
  2. [Results] The error bar on Ic = 9(1) × 10^3 s^{-1} is given; the manuscript should state the number of independent realizations and the criterion used to identify the dc-to-ac transition point.
  3. [Figures] Figure captions should explicitly label which panels show experimental data versus simulation output to aid direct comparison.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of our work and for the constructive comment on strengthening the evidence for global phase locking. We address the major comment below and will incorporate the requested quantitative check in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Phase-dynamics analysis section] The central claim that dissipation is mediated by junction-localized vortex-antivortex pairs while the bulk remains globally phase-locked (and therefore that the ring topology is preserved) is load-bearing for the SQUID analogue. The manuscript should provide an explicit, quantitative check—e.g., time-resolved integration of the phase gradient around a closed contour in the bulk or direct computation of the winding number in the simulations—to rule out barrier-induced net circulation changes. Without this, the mapping from barrier speed to bias current rests on an unverified assumption.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit, quantitative verification would strengthen the central claim regarding preservation of the ring topology. In the revised manuscript we will add a direct computation of the winding number extracted from the classical-field simulations. Specifically, we will integrate the phase gradient around a closed contour lying entirely in the bulk (away from the junctions) and demonstrate that the winding number remains constant (equal to zero) throughout the time evolution, both below and above Ic. This will be presented as a new panel in the phase-dynamics figure, together with a brief description of the numerical procedure. The addition directly addresses the referee’s suggestion and removes any ambiguity in the mapping from barrier velocity to bias current. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental measurements and independent simulations are self-contained

full rationale

The paper reports direct experimental measurements of the I-Δμ characteristics and critical current in a ring-shaped BEC with translated optical barriers, together with classical-field simulations that include the moving barriers and quantitatively reproduce the observed nonlinear curve and Ic value. The claims of dc-to-ac switching, vortex-antivortex dissipation, and global phase-locking under the ring topology are grounded in these measurements and simulations rather than any fitted parameter redefined as a prediction, self-definitional mapping, or load-bearing self-citation chain. No derivation step reduces by construction to its own inputs; the results stand as independent validation against external data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract relies on standard domain assumptions of ultracold-atom physics and classical-field modeling; no free parameters or new entities are explicitly introduced in the provided text.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The ring topology enforces quantized circulation and global phase locking of the bulk condensate.
    Invoked when stating that the bulk remains phase-locked despite local dissipation at the junctions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5777 in / 1316 out tokens · 39963 ms · 2026-05-18T20:33:11.213641+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    Analysis of the ensuing phase dynamics shows that dissipation is mediated by the nucleation and traversal of vortex-antivortex pairs through the junctions, while the bulk condensate remains globally phase-locked—direct evidence of the ring’s topological constraint enforcing quantized circulation.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    For narrow junctions (w ≈ 1 µm) the circuit exhibits a pronounced dc branch that terminates at a critical current Ic = 9(1) × 10^3 s^{-1}

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Fraunhofer Patterns in Atomic Josephson Junctions

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Synthetic magnetic fields induce Fraunhofer-like patterns in the critical current of atomic Josephson junctions via spatial interference and Josephson vortices, distinct from charged superconducting cases due to atomi...

  2. Shapiro steps of superfluid Fermi gases in a ring trap across the BCS--BEC crossover

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Time-dependent BdG simulations show low-order Shapiro steps in barrier velocity versus chemical potential difference for ring-trapped superfluid Fermi gases, with quantization in units of ħω/2.

  3. Dynamics of one-dimensional Bose-Josephson Junction in a Box Trap: From Coherent Oscillations to Many-Body Dephasing and Dynamical Freezing

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Simulations identify distinct regimes in 1D Bose-Josephson dynamics: coherent oscillations, imbalance-driven dephasing with collapse-revival, equilibration with fragmentation, and strong-interaction dynamical freezing...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    B. D. Josephson, Possible new effects in superconductive tunnelling, Physics letters 1, 251 (1962)

    work page 1962

  2. [2]

    Barone and G

    A. Barone and G. Patern` o, Josephson Effects: Basic Concepts (Springer, 1983)

    work page 1983

  3. [3]

    Tinkham, Introduction to superconductivity (Courier Corporation, 2004)

    M. Tinkham, Introduction to superconductivity (Courier Corporation, 2004)

    work page 2004

  4. [4]

    Rashidi, S

    A. Rashidi, S. Ahadi, and S. Stemmer, Self-field-induced josephson diode effect, Nano Letters (2025)

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    K. G. Fedorov, S. V. Shitov, H. Rotzinger, and A. V. Ustinov, Nonreciprocal microwave transmission through a long josephson junction, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 85, 184512 (2012)

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    Ozyuzer, A

    L. Ozyuzer, A. E. Koshelev, C. Kurter, N. Gopalsami, Q. Li, M. Tachiki, K. Kadowaki, T. Yamamoto, H. Mi- nami, H. Yamaguchi, et al., Emission of coherent thz ra- diation from superconductors, Science 318, 1291 (2007)

    work page 2007

  7. [7]

    A. J. Leggett, Macroscopic quantum tunnelling and re- lated matters, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 26, 1986 (1987)

    work page 1986

  8. [8]

    A. J. Leggett, Macroscopic Quantum Systems and the Quantum Theory of Measurement, Progress of Theoret- ical Physics Supplement 69, 80 (1980)

    work page 1980

  9. [9]

    Khalid, R

    A. Khalid, R. Salman, and S. Anwar, Principles and Ap- plications of Superconducting Quantum Interference De- vices (SQUIDs) (2010)

    work page 2010

  10. [10]

    Amico, D

    L. Amico, D. Anderson, M. Boshier, J.-P. Brantut, L.-C. Kwek, A. Minguzzi, and W. von Klitzing, Colloquium: Atomtronic circuits: From many-body physics to quan- tum technologies, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 041001 (2022)

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    J. Polo, W. J. Chetcuti, E. C. Domanti, P. Kitson, A. Os- terloh, F. Perciavalle, V. P. Singh, and L. Amico, Per- spective on new implementations of atomtronic circuits, Quantum Science and Technology 9, 030501 (2024)

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Smerzi, S

    A. Smerzi, S. Fantoni, S. Giovanazzi, and S. R. Shenoy, Quantum coherent atomic tunneling between two trapped bose-einstein condensates, Physical Review Letters 79, 4950–4953 (1997)

    work page 1997

  13. [13]

    W. J. Kwon, G. D. Pace, R. Panza, M. Inguscio, W. Zw- erger, M. Zaccanti, F. Scazza, and G. Roati, Strongly correlated superfluid order parameters from dc Joseph- son supercurrents, Science 369, 84 (2020)

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    Luick, L

    N. Luick, L. Sobirey, M. Bohlen, V. P. Singh, L. Mathey, T. Lompe, and H. Moritz, An ideal Josephson junction in an ultracold two-dimensional Fermi gas, Science 369, 89 (2020)

    work page 2020

  15. [15]

    V. P. Singh, J. Polo, L. Mathey, and L. Amico, Shapiro Steps in Driven Atomic Josephson Junctions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 093401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Del Pace, D

    G. Del Pace, D. Hern´ andez-Rajkov, V. P. Singh, N. Grani, M. F. Fern´ andez, G. Nesti, J. A. Seman, M. In- guscio, L. Amico, and G. Roati, Shapiro steps in strongly- interacting Fermi gases, Arxiv (2024), arXiv:2409.03448 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    work page arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    Bernhart, M

    E. Bernhart, M. R¨ ohrle, V. P. Singh, L. Mathey, L. Am- ico, and H. Ott, Observation of Shapiro steps in an ultracold atomic Josephson junction, Arxiv (2024), arXiv:2409.03340 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    work page arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    V. P. Singh, L. Amico, and L. Mathey, Atomic Josephson Parametric Amplifier (2025), arXiv:2503.20890

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Albiez, R

    M. Albiez, R. Gati, J. F¨ olling, S. Hunsmann, M. Cris- tiani, and M. K. Oberthaler, Direct Observation of Tun- neling and Nonlinear Self-Trapping in a Single Bosonic Josephson Junction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 010402 (2005)

    work page 2005

  20. [20]

    S. Levy, E. Lahoud, I. Shomroni, and J. Steinhauer, The a.c. and d.c. Josephson effects in a Bose–Einstein con- densate, Nature 449, 579 (2007)

    work page 2007

  21. [21]

    Del Pace, W

    G. Del Pace, W. J. Kwon, M. Zaccanti, G. Roati, and F. Scazza, Tunneling Transport of Unitary Fermions across the Superfluid Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 055301 (2021)

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    Moulder, S

    S. Moulder, S. Beattie, R. P. Smith, N. Tammuz, and Z. Hadzibabic, Quantized supercurrent decay in an an- nular bose-einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A 86, 013629 (2012)

    work page 2012

  23. [23]

    and Wright, K

    Ramanathan, A. and Wright, K. C. and Muniz, S. R. and Zelan, M. and Hill, W. T. and Lobb, C. J. and Helmerson, K. and Phillips, W. D. and Campbell, G. K., Superflow in a Toroidal Bose-Einstein Condensate: An Atom Circuit with a Tunable Weak Link, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 130401 (2011)

    work page 2011

  24. [24]

    Del Pace, K

    G. Del Pace, K. Xhani, A. Muzi Falconi, M. Fedrizzi, N. Grani, D. Hernandez Rajkov, M. Inguscio, F. Scazza, W. J. Kwon, and G. Roati, Imprinting Persistent Cur- rents in Tunable Fermionic Rings, Phys. Rev. X 12, 041037 (2022)

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    Y. Cai, D. G. Allman, P. Sabharwal, and K. C. Wright, Persistent currents in rings of ultracold fermionic atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 150401 (2022)

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    K. C. Wright, R. B. Blakestad, C. J. Lobb, W. D. Phillips, and G. K. Campbell, Driving Phase Slips in a Superfluid Atom Circuit with a Rotating Weak Link, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 025302 (2013)

    work page 2013

  27. [27]

    Jendrzejewski, S

    F. Jendrzejewski, S. Eckel, N. Murray, C. Lanier, M. Ed- wards, C. J. Lobb, and G. K. Campbell, Resistive Flow in a Weakly Interacting Bose-Einstein Condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 045305 (2014)

    work page 2014

  28. [28]

    Piazza, L

    F. Piazza, L. A. Collins, and A. Smerzi, Vortex-induced phase-slip dissipation in a toroidal Bose-Einstein conden- sate flowing through a barrier, Phys. Rev. A 80, 021601 6 (2009)

    work page 2009

  29. [29]

    Eckel, J

    S. Eckel, J. G. Lee, F. Jendrzejewski, N. Murray, C. W. Clark, C. J. Lobb, W. D. Phillips, M. Edwards, and G. K. Campbell, Hysteresis in a quantized superfluid ‘atom- tronic’ circuit, Nature 506, 200 (2014)

    work page 2014

  30. [30]

    A. C. Mathey, C. W. Clark, and L. Mathey, Decay of a superfluid current of ultracold atoms in a toroidal trap, Phys. Rev. A 90, 023604 (2014)

    work page 2014

  31. [31]

    A. C. Mathey and L. Mathey, Realizing and optimiz- ing an atomtronic SQUID, New Journal of Physics 18, 055016 (2016)

    work page 2016

  32. [32]

    C. Ryu, P. W. Blackburn, A. A. Blinova, and M. G. Boshier, Experimental Realization of Josephson Junc- tions for an Atom SQUID, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 205301 (2013)

    work page 2013

  33. [33]

    C. Ryu, E. C. Samson, and M. G. Boshier, Quantum interference of currents in an atomtronic SQUID, Nature Communications 11, 3338 (2020)

    work page 2020

  34. [34]

    Kiehn, V

    H. Kiehn, V. P. Singh, and L. Mathey, Implementation of an atomtronic SQUID in a strongly confined toroidal condensate, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 033024 (2022)

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    J. Polo, W. Chetcuti, T. Haug, A. Minguzzi, K. Wright, and L. Amico, Persistent currents in ultracold gases, Physics Reports 1137, 1 (2025)

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    G¨ org, L

    K. G¨ org, L. Mathey, and V. P. Singh, Realizing an Atomtronic AQUID in a Rotating-Box Potential (2025), arXiv:2508.17889

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Gauthier, I

    G. Gauthier, I. Lenton, N. M. Parry, M. Baker, M. Davis, H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, and T. Neely, Direct imaging of a digital-micromirror device for configurable microscopic optical potentials, Optica 3, 1136 (2016)

    work page 2016

  38. [38]

    Gauthier, T

    G. Gauthier, T. A. Bell, A. B. Stilgoe, M. Baker, H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, and T. W. Neely, Chapter One - Dynamic high-resolution optical trapping of ultracold atoms (Academic Press, 2021) pp. 1–101

    work page 2021

  39. [39]

    Aidelsburger, J

    M. Aidelsburger, J. L. Ville, R. Saint-Jalm, S. Nascimb` ene, J. Dalibard, and J. Beugnon, Re- laxation dynamics in the merging of n independent condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 190403 (2017)

    work page 2017

  40. [40]

    Pezz` e, K

    L. Pezz` e, K. Xhani, C. Daix, N. Grani, B. Donelli, F. Scazza, D. Hernandez-Rajkov, W. J. Kwon, G. Del Pace, and G. Roati, Stabilizing persistent cur- rents in an atomtronic josephson junction necklace, Na- ture Communications 15, 4831 (2024)

    work page 2024

  41. [41]

    Sunami, V

    S. Sunami, V. P. Singh, D. Garrick, A. Beregi, A. J. Barker, K. Luksch, E. Bentine, L. Mathey, and C. J. Foot, Observation of the berezinskii-kosterlitz-thouless transi- tion in a two-dimensional bose gas via matter-wave in- terferometry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 250402 (2022)

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    Morizot, Y

    O. Morizot, Y. Colombe, V. Lorent, H. Perrin, and B. M. Garraway, Ring trap for ultracold atoms, Phys. Rev. A 74, 023617 (2006)

    work page 2006

  43. [43]

    Blakie, A

    P. Blakie, A. Bradley, M. Davis, R. Ballagh, and C. Gar- diner, Dynamics and statistical mechanics of ultra-cold Bose gases using c-field techniques, Advances in Physics 57, 363 (2008)

    work page 2008

  44. [44]

    Polkovnikov, Phase space representation of quantum dynamics, Annals of Physics 325, 1790 (2010)

    A. Polkovnikov, Phase space representation of quantum dynamics, Annals of Physics 325, 1790 (2010)

    work page 2010

  45. [45]

    V. P. Singh, C. Weitenberg, J. Dalibard, and L. Mathey, Superfluidity and relaxation dynamics of a laser-stirred two-dimensional Bose gas, Phys. Rev. A 95, 043631 (2017)

    work page 2017

  46. [46]

    V. P. Singh and L. Mathey, Collective modes and super- fluidity of a two-dimensional ultracold Bose gas, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 023112 (2021)

    work page 2021

  47. [47]

    V. P. Singh, N. Luick, L. Sobirey, and L. Mathey, Joseph- son junction dynamics in a two-dimensional ultracold Bose gas, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033298 (2020)

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    Ramanathan, K

    A. Ramanathan, K. C. Wright, S. R. Muniz, M. Zelan, W. T. Hill, C. J. Lobb, K. Helmerson, W. D. Phillips, and G. K. Campbell, Superflow in a toroidal bose-einstein condensate: An atom circuit with a tunable weak link, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 130401 (2011)

    work page 2011

  49. [49]

    C. Ryu, M. F. Andersen, P. Clad´ e, V. Natarajan, K. Helmerson, and W. D. Phillips, Observation of per- sistent flow of a Bose–Einstein condensate in a toroidal trap, Physical Review Letters 99, 260401 (2007)

    work page 2007

  50. [50]

    A. V. Ustinov, Solitons in josephson junctions, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 123, 315 (1998)

    work page 1998

  51. [51]

    B. Pal, A. Chakraborty, P. K. Sivakumar, M. Davydova, A. K. Gopi, A. K. Pandeya, J. A. Krieger, Y. Zhang, M. Date, S. Ju, N. Yuan, N. B. M. Schr¨ oter, L. Fu, and S. S. P. Parkin, Josephson diode effect from cooper pair momentum in a topological semimetal, Nature Physics 18, 1228 (2022)

    work page 2022

  52. [52]

    H. Wu, Y. Wang, Y. Xu, P. K. Sivakumar, C. Pasco, U. Filippozzi, S. S. P. Parkin, Y.-J. Zeng, T. McQueen, and M. N. Ali, The field-free josephson diode in a van der waals heterostructure, Nature 604, 653 (2022)

    work page 2022

  53. [53]

    W. Gou, T. Chen, D. Xie, T. Xiao, T.-S. Deng, B. Gad- way, W. Yi, and B. Yan, Tunable nonreciprocal quantum transport through a dissipative aharonov–bohm ring, Physical Review Letters 124, 070402 (2020)

    work page 2020

  54. [54]

    J. W. Z. Lau, K. S. Gan, R. Dumke, L. Amico, L.-C. Kwek, and T. Haug, Atomtronic multitermi- nal Aharonov-Bohm interferometer, Phys. Rev. A 107, L051303 (2023)

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    T. L. Gustavson, P. Bouyer, and M. A. Kasevich, Preci- sion rotation measurements with an atom interferometer gyroscope, Physical Review Letters 78, 2046 (1997)

    work page 2046

  56. [56]

    S. M. Dickerson, J. M. Hogan, A. Sugarbaker, D. M. S. Johnson, and M. A. Kasevich, Multiaxis inertial sensing with long-time point source atom interferometry, Physi- cal Review Letters 111, 083001 (2013)

    work page 2013

  57. [57]

    Canuel, F

    B. Canuel, F. Leduc, D. Holleville, A. Gauguet, J. Fils, A. Virdis, A. Clairon, N. Dimarcq, C. J. Bord´ e, A. Lan- dragin, and P. Bouyer, Six-axis inertial sensor using cold- atom interferometry, Physical Review Letters 97, 010402 (2006)

    work page 2006

  58. [58]

    K. A. Krzyzanowska, J. Ferreras, C. Ryu, E. C. Samson, and M. G. Boshier, Matter-wave analog of a fiber-optic gyroscope, Phys. Rev. A 108, 043305 (2023)

    work page 2023

  59. [59]

    Strambini, A

    E. Strambini, A. Iorio, O. Durante, R. Citro, C. Sanz- Fern´ andez, C. Guarcello, I. V. Tokatly, A. Braggio, and F. Giazotto, A josephson phase battery, Nature Nan- otechnology 15, 656 (2020)

    work page 2020

  60. [60]

    J. E. Mooij, T. P. Orlando, L. Levitov, L. Tian, C. H. van der Wal, and S. Lloyd, Josephson persistent-current qubit, Science 285, 1036 (1999)

    work page 1999

  61. [61]

    L. B. Ioffe, M. V. Feigel’man, A. Ioselevich, D. Ivanov, M. Troyer, and G. Blatter, Topologically protected quan- tum bits using josephson junction arrays, Nature 415, 503 (2002). 7 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0 20 40 0 20 40 t (s) x (µm) 0 20 40 (a) v/v0 = 0.1 n (µm−2) x (µm) 0 20 40 (b) v/v0 = 0.4 FIG. A1. (a, b) Time evolution of the averaged density profile...

    work page 2002