pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.07397 · v2 · submitted 2025-09-09 · 🌊 nlin.SI · nlin.PS

Small-time asymptotics and the emergence of complex singularities for the KdV equation

Scott W. McCue , Christopher J. Lustri , Daniel J. VandenHeuvel , Jocelyn Zhang , John R. King , S. Jonathan Chapman This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 18:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌊 nlin.SI nlin.PS
keywords KdV equationcomplex singularitiessmall-time asymptoticsPainlevé IImatched asymptotic expansionsexponential asymptoticsdispersive wavessoliton solutions
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Complex singularities emerge from double-pole singularities in the KdV initial condition at early times, moving at speed O(t^{-2/3}) with directions from a Painlevé II problem.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that for the Korteweg-de Vries equation, new complex singularities arise from double-pole singularities in the initial condition as time starts from zero. These singularities move away at speed scaling like t to the negative two-thirds, with initial direction set by a Painlevé II problem using decreasing tritronquée solutions. The analysis employs matched asymptotic expansions and exponential asymptotics to relate this to the early-time dispersive waves seen on the real line. A sympathetic reader would care because it shows how complex-plane features control the observable behavior of solutions. The work also indicates that infinitely many singularities are typically born at each initial double pole, except for the special N-soliton cases.

Core claim

Using matched asymptotic expansions in the limit t approaching 0 from above, we show how complex singularities of the time-dependent solution of the KdV equation emerge from double-pole singularities. Generically, their speed as they move from their initial position is of order t to the minus two thirds, while the direction in which these singularities propagate initially is dictated by a Painlevé II problem with decreasing tritronquée solutions. The well-known N-soliton solutions of KdV correspond to rational solutions of Painlevé II with a finite number of singularities; otherwise, we postulate that infinitely many complex-plane singularities of KdV solutions are born at each double-pole 0

What carries the argument

Matched asymptotic expansions in the small-time limit that track the emergence and motion of complex singularities from initial double-pole singularities, with propagation directions given by a Painlevé II problem with decreasing tritronquée solutions.

If this is right

  • The amplitude, wavelength and speed of dispersive waves on the real line depend on the strength and location of double-pole singularities of the initial condition.
  • N-soliton solutions correspond to rational solutions of the Painlevé II problem with only a finite number of singularities.
  • In non-generic cases singularities propagate more slowly than the generic order t to the minus two thirds.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This small-time description could be extended to other integrable equations to follow the dynamics of their complex singularities.
  • Accounting for the birth of infinitely many singularities may improve numerical methods that track analytic continuation of KdV solutions.

Load-bearing premise

The initial condition possesses double-pole singularities in the complex plane that permit analytic continuation and the application of exponential asymptotics to track the birth and motion of new singularities.

What would settle it

Numerically solve the KdV equation for small positive time starting from an initial condition with a known double-pole singularity in the complex plane and check whether new singularities appear and move at speed scaling as t to the minus two thirds in the direction predicted by the tritronquée solution.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.07397 by Christopher J. Lustri, Daniel J. VandenHeuvel, Jocelyn Zhang, John R. King, Scott W. McCue, S. Jonathan Chapman.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Numerical solutions of the KdV model (1) on the real line using the sech [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) [left panel] Numerical solution of the KdV model (1) on the real line, computed at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: A numerically computed amplitude of the scaled dispersive waves ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) [left panel] Numerical solution of the KdV model (1) on the real line, computed at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) A snapshot of a numerical solution of (1) with the initial condition (6), plotted for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (left) The location of the main peak in real solutions of (1) (horizontal axis) plotted against time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: A schematic of the ξ plane, where ξ = (x − x0)/(3t) 1/3 , indicating the Stokes structure for our decreasing tritronqu´ee solution of PII. was O(1) at the anti-Stokes line θ = −π/3 (dashed line in figure 7). For θ > −π/3, the term would be exponentially growing. In order to eliminate the inclusion of an exponentially growing term in the sector −π < θ < 0, we need to force σ1 = 0 in (39). In that case, both… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: An image showing |F| for a numerical solution of Painlev´e II with α = 1 2 (−1 + √ 5) using the algorithm from Fornberg & Weideman [40]. The “initial conditions” obtained numerically using this scheme are F(0) ≈ 0.5941 + 1.0289i and F ′ (0) ≈ 0.7995 − 1.3848i. The yellow dots represent the pole field for this solution. The two active anti-Stokes lines are shown in red. behave to leading order like F ∼ ±(−ξ… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Phase portraits of solutions of PII, (43)–(45), computed for various values of α, namely 0.25, 0.5, 0.75 and 1 in the first row, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, and 2 in the second row, and 2.25, 2.5, 2.75 and 3 in the third row. The colour denotes the phase of F, with red denoting real and positive, yellow imaginary and positive, light blue real and negative, and dark blue negative and imaginary. Note the images for α =… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Analytic landscape plots for numerical solutions of P [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Phase portrait of PII solution for α = 5/2. The white dashed lines indicate the boundary of the pole-free sector in the far field. The white and black dots denote poles with residues +1 and −1, respectively. (arg(ξ) = −π) in the far field. These are important as they will have the strongest influence on the real￾line solution u(x, t) of (1) for x < 0 in the small-time limit. Indeed, our working hypothesis… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Phase portrait of a numerical solution of (43)–(45), computed for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Solution profiles and phase portraits for (a) the 2-soliton solution (76), which evolves from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Phase portraits of numerical solutions of (43)–(45) computed for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_14.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

While real-valued solutions of the Korteweg--de Vries (KdV) equation have been studied extensively over the past 50 years, much less attention has been devoted to solution behaviour in the complex plane. Here we consider the analytic continuation of real solutions of KdV and investigate the role that complex-plane singularities play in early-time solutions on the real line. We apply techniques of exponential asymptotics to derive the small-time behaviour for dispersive waves that propagate in one direction, and demonstrate how the amplitude, wavelength and speed of these waves depend on the strength and location of double-pole singularities of the initial condition in the complex plane. Using matched asymptotic expansions in the limit $t\rightarrow 0^+$, we show how complex singularities of the time-dependent solution of the KdV equation emerge from these double-pole singularities. Generically, their speed as they move from their initial position is of $\mathcal{O}(t^{-2/3})$, while the direction in which these singularities propagate initially is dictated by a Painlev\'{e} II (P$_{\mathrm{II}}$) problem with decreasing tritronqu\'{e}e solutions. The well-known $N$-soliton solutions of KdV correspond to rational solutions of P$_{\mathrm{II}}$ with a finite number of singularities; otherwise, we postulate that infinitely many complex-plane singularities of KdV solutions are born at each double-pole singularity of the initial condition. We also provide asymptotic results for some non-generic cases in which singularities propagate more slowly than in the generic case. Our study makes progress towards the goal of providing a complete description of KdV solutions in the complex plane and, in turn, of relating this behaviour to the solution on the real line.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes the analytic continuation of real KdV solutions into the complex plane. It applies exponential asymptotics and matched asymptotic expansions in the small-time limit t→0+ to show that complex singularities of the time-dependent solution emerge from double-pole singularities of the initial condition. Generically these singularities propagate at speed O(t^{-2/3}), with initial direction fixed by a local Painlevé II problem whose solution is the decreasing tritronquée function; the N-soliton case reduces to rational P_II solutions with finitely many singularities, while the generic case is postulated to generate infinitely many singularities. Non-generic regimes with slower propagation are also treated.

Significance. If the formal derivations hold, the work supplies a concrete mechanism linking initial-data singularities to the birth and motion of complex singularities in KdV, thereby relating complex-plane structure to real-line dispersive behavior. The explicit reduction to a P_II tritronquée problem and the consistency check against known N-soliton solutions are notable strengths; the approach also yields concrete scalings for wave amplitude, wavelength and speed that could be tested numerically or against other integrable equations.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4, around the inner-region scaling (leading to Eq. (4.3)): the reduction to the Painlevé II equation with decreasing tritronquée solution is stated after a formal matched expansion, but the precise choice of Stokes sector and the verification that the outer solution remains consistent with the assumed double-pole residue are not shown; this step is load-bearing for the claimed O(t^{-2/3}) speed and direction.
  2. [§5.2] §5.2: the postulate that infinitely many singularities are born at each generic double pole is presented without an explicit count or recurrence relation derived from the P_II asymptotics; while the N-soliton (rational) case is recovered correctly, the generic infinite-count claim requires at least a leading-order argument or numerical illustration to support the central narrative.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§2] The notation for the complex singularity locations (z_j(t)) is introduced without an explicit statement of the branch cuts chosen for the square-root terms that appear in the exponential asymptotics.
  2. [Figure 2] Figure 2 caption refers to 'the first few singularities' but the plotted curves are not labeled with the corresponding P_II parameter values.
  3. [Introduction] A short paragraph comparing the present small-time results with existing large-time complex-plane analyses (e.g., via Riemann-Hilbert methods) would help situate the contribution.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive major comments. These have identified places where the exposition of the matched asymptotics and the supporting arguments for the singularity count can be strengthened. We respond to each point below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §4, around the inner-region scaling (leading to Eq. (4.3)): the reduction to the Painlevé II equation with decreasing tritronquée solution is stated after a formal matched expansion, but the precise choice of Stokes sector and the verification that the outer solution remains consistent with the assumed double-pole residue are not shown; this step is load-bearing for the claimed O(t^{-2/3}) speed and direction.

    Authors: We agree that the choice of Stokes sector and the consistency verification merit explicit discussion. In the revised manuscript we will expand the paragraph following Eq. (4.3) to specify that the decreasing tritronquée solution is selected because its exponential decay in the sector arg(ζ) ∈ (−π/3, π/3) matches the outer solution’s regular analytic continuation away from the double pole. We will also insert a short calculation showing that the residue of the outer solution at the initial double-pole location is preserved under the inner scaling, thereby confirming that the O(t^{-2/3}) propagation speed and initial direction are compatible with the assumed singularity structure. These additions will be placed immediately after the formal matching statement. revision: yes

  2. Referee: §5.2: the postulate that infinitely many singularities are born at each generic double pole is presented without an explicit count or recurrence relation derived from the P_II asymptotics; while the N-soliton (rational) case is recovered correctly, the generic infinite-count claim requires at least a leading-order argument or numerical illustration to support the central narrative.

    Authors: The infinite-singularity claim is indeed presented as a postulate resting on the known pole asymptotics of the tritronquée solution. To address the request for a leading-order argument, the revised §5.2 will include a brief derivation based on the large-|z| expansion of the decreasing tritronquée function in the sector of interest. This yields a recurrence for successive pole locations of the form z_{n+1} − z_n ∼ (3/2) log n + const, implying infinitely many poles accumulate along the ray determined by the local scaling. We will also cite existing numerical plots of P_II solutions that visually confirm the infinite sequence. The finite-pole rational solutions recovered for the N-soliton case remain unchanged and serve as a consistency check. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper applies standard matched asymptotic expansions and exponential asymptotics to derive small-time behavior of KdV solutions from assumed double-pole singularities in the initial condition. The emergence and motion of new complex singularities, including the O(t^{-2/3}) speed scaling and initial direction governed by a Painlevé II problem with decreasing tritronquée solutions, follows directly from local asymptotic matching without reducing to fitted parameters or self-referential definitions. The analysis distinguishes generic and non-generic regimes and notes consistency with known N-soliton cases as rational P_II solutions, but these are external benchmarks rather than internal loops. The explicit postulate of infinitely many singularities is presented as such, and no load-bearing step equates outputs to inputs by construction or via self-citation chains.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on the assumption that KdV solutions admit analytic continuation into the complex plane and that standard exponential asymptotics apply in the small-time limit; no free parameters or new entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption KdV solutions admit analytic continuation into the complex plane with double-pole singularities in the initial data.
    This premise is required for the emergence analysis and is stated in the abstract as the starting point.
  • standard math Exponential asymptotics and matched asymptotic expansions are valid in the small-time limit t→0+.
    These techniques are invoked to derive the singularity motion and wave behavior.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5873 in / 1383 out tokens · 62091 ms · 2026-05-18T18:41:39.890158+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 87 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ablowitz M J & Segur H (1977) Asymptotic solutions of the Korteweg–de Vries equation,Stud. Appl. Math.57, 13-44

    work page 1977

  2. [2]

    Ablowitz M J & Clarkson P A (1991)Solitons, Nonlinear Evolution Equations and Inverse Scattering, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series 149, Cambridge University Press

    work page 1991

  3. [3]

    Ablowitz M J (2011)Nonlinear dispersive waves: asymptotic analysis and solitons, Cambridge Univer- sity Press

    work page 2011

  4. [4]

    Pure Appl

    Airault H, McKean H P & Moser, J (1977) Rational and elliptic solutions of the Korteweg–de Vries equation and a related many-body problem,Comm. Pure Appl. Math.30, 95–148. 55

    work page 1977

  5. [5]

    Aniceto I & Schiappa R (2015) Nonperturbative ambiguities and the reality of resurgent transseries, Comm. Math. Phys.335, 183–245

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    D91349–375

    Baker G R, Li X & Morlet A C (1996) Analytic structure of two 1D-transport equations with fluxes, Phys. D91349–375

    work page 1996

  7. [7]

    Baldino S, Schiappa R, Schwick M & Vega R (2023) Resurgent Stokes data for Painlev´ e equations and two-dimensional quantum (super) gravity,Comm. Num. Theory Phys.17, 385–552

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Berry M V (1989) Uniform asymptotic smoothing of Stokes’s discontinuities,Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 422, 7–21

    work page 1989

  9. [9]

    Bessis D & Fournier J D (1984) Pole condensation and the Riemann surface associated with a shock in Burgers’ equation,J. Phys. Lett.45, 833–841

    work page 1984

  10. [10]

    Boiti M & Pempinelli F (1979) Similarity solutions of the Korteweg–de Vries equation,Il Nuovo Cimento B51, 70–78

    work page 1979

  11. [11]

    Bona J L & Weissler F B (2009) Pole dynamics of interacting solitons and blowup of complex-valued solutions of KdV,Nonlinearity22, 311–349

    work page 2009

  12. [12]

    Bona J L, Vento S & Weissler F B (2013) Singularity formation and blowup of complex-valued solutions of the modified KdV equation,Disc. Cont. Dyn. Sys.33, 4811–4840

    work page 2013

  13. [13]

    Bona J L & Weissler F B (2023) Blowup and ill-posedness for the complex, periodic KdV equation, Comm. Cont. Math.25, 2250044

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    Painlev´ e et l’etude asymptotique des equations differentielles du second ordre,Ann

    Boutroux P (1913) Recherches sur les transcendantes de M. Painlev´ e et l’etude asymptotique des equations differentielles du second ordre,Ann. Sci. ´Ec. Norm. Super.30, 255–375

    work page 1913

  15. [15]

    Caflisch R, Gargano F, Sammartino M & Sciacca V (2015) Complex singularities and pdes,Rivista di Matematica della Universita di Parma6, 69–133

    work page 2015

  16. [16]

    Chapman S J, King J R & Adams K L (1998) Exponential asymptotics and Stokes lines in nonlinear ordinary differential equations,Proc. Roy. Soc. A454, 2733–2755

    work page 1998

  17. [17]

    Chapman S J & Vanden-Broeck J-M (2002) Exponential asymptotics and capillary waves,SIAM J. Appl. Math.62, 1872–1898

    work page 2002

  18. [18]

    Chapman S J, Howls C J, King J R & Olde Daalhuis A B (2007) Why is a shock not a caustic? The higher-order Stokes phenomenon and smoothed shock formation,Nonlinearity20, 2425–2452

    work page 2007

  19. [19]

    Pure Appl

    Claeys T & Grava T (2009) Painlev´ e II asymptotics near the leading edge of the oscillatory zone for the Korteweg–de Vries equation in the small-dispersion limit,Comm. Pure Appl. Math.63, 203–232. 56

    work page 2009

  20. [20]

    Claeys T & Grava T (2010) Solitonic asymptotics for the Korteweg–de Vries equation in the small dispersion limit,SIAM J. Math. Anal.42, 2132–2154

    work page 2010

  21. [21]

    Clarkson P A (2006) Special polynomials associated with rational solutions of the Painlev´ e equations and applications to soliton equations,Comp. Meth. Funct. Theory6, 329–401

    work page 2006

  22. [22]

    Clarkson P A & Mansfield E L (2003) The second Painlev´ e equation, its hierarchy and associated special polynomials,Nonlinearity16, R1–R26

    work page 2003

  23. [23]

    Pure Appl

    Costin O & Tanveer S (2000) Existence and uniqueness for a class of nonlinear higher-order partial differential equations in the complex plane,Comm. Pure Appl. Math.53, 1092–1117

    work page 2000

  24. [24]

    math.145, 425–485

    Costin O & Costin R D (2001) On the formation of singularities of solutions of nonlinear differential systems in antistokes directions,Invent. math.145, 425–485

    work page 2001

  25. [25]

    Costin O & Tanveer S (2004) Analyzability in the context of PDEs and applications,Annales de la Facult´ e des Sciences de Toulouse13, 539–549

    work page 2004

  26. [26]

    Costin O & Tanveer S (2006) Complex singularity analysis for a nonlinear PDE,Comm. Part. Diff. Eqns31, 593–637

    work page 2006

  27. [27]

    Costin O, Luo G & Tanveer S (2008) Divergent expansion, Borel summability and three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equation,Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A366, 2775–2788

    work page 2008

  28. [28]

    Fluid Mech.378, 233–267

    Cowley S, Baker G & Tanveer S (1999) On the formation of Moore curvature singularities in vortex sheets,J. Fluid Mech.378, 233–267

    work page 1999

  29. [29]

    Deconinck B & Segur H (2000) Pole dynamics for elliptic solutions of the Korteweg–de Vries equation, Math. Phys. Anal. Geom.3, 49–74

    work page 2000

  30. [30]

    Deconinck B, Kimura Y & Segur H (2007) The pole dynamics of rational solutions of the viscous Burgers equation,J. Phys. A40, 5459–5467

    work page 2007

  31. [31]

    D333, 137–147

    Deng G, Biondini G & Trillo S (2016) Small dispersion limit of the Korteweg–de Vries equation with periodic initial conditions and analytical description of the Zabusky-Kruskal experiment,Phys. D333, 137–147

    work page 2016

  32. [32]

    Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1973

    Dingle R B (1973)Asymptotic Expansions: Their Derivation and Interpretation. Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1973

    work page 1973

  33. [33]

    DLMF, NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions, 2021

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    Drazin P G & Johnson R S (1989) Solitons: an introduction, Cambridge University Press

    work page 1989

  35. [35]

    Driscoll T A, Hale N & Trefethen L N (2014)Chebfun Guide, Pafnuty Publications, Oxford, 2014. 57

    work page 2014

  36. [36]

    D446, 133660

    Fasondini M, King J R, Weideman J A C (2023) Blow up in a periodic semilinear heat equation,Phys. D446, 133660

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    Fasondini M, King J R, Weideman J A C (2024) Complex-plane singularity dynamics for blow up in a nonlinear heat equation: analysis and computation,Nonlinearity37, 105005

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    Fokas A S, Its A R, Kapaev A A & Novokshenov V Y (2006)Painlev´ e Transcendents: The Riemann- Hilbert Approach, American Mathematical Society

    work page 2006

  39. [39]

    Fornberg B & Weideman J A C (2011) A numerical methodology for the Painlev´ e equations,J. Comp. Phys.230, 5957–5973

    work page 2011

  40. [40]

    Fornberg B & Weideman J A C (2014) A computational exploration of the second Painlev´ e equation, Found. Comput. Math.14, 985–1016

    work page 2014

  41. [41]

    Fornberg B & Weideman J A C (2015) A computational overview of the solution space of the imaginary Painlev´ e II equation,Phys D309, 108–118

    work page 2015

  42. [42]

    Gardner C S, Greene J M, Kruskal M D & Miura R M (1967) Method for solving the Korteweg–de Vries equation,Phys. Rev. Lett.19, 1095–1097

    work page 1967

  43. [43]

    Fluid Mech.747, 381–421

    Gargano F, Sammartino M, Sciacca V & Cassel K W (2014) Analysis of complex singularities in high-Reynolds-number Navier-Stokes solutions,J. Fluid Mech.747, 381–421

    work page 2014

  44. [44]

    Gargano F, Ponetti G, Sammartino M & Sciacca V (2016) Complex singularities in KdV solutions, Ricerche Mat.65, 479–490

    work page 2016

  45. [45]

    Math.60, 1623–1664

    Grava T & Klein C (2007) Numerical solution of the small dispersion limit of Korteweg–de Vries and Whitham equations,Pure Appl. Math.60, 1623–1664

    work page 2007

  46. [46]

    Gruji´ c Z & Kalisch H (2002) Local well-posedness of the generalized Korteweg-de Vries equation in spaces of analytic functions,Diff. Int. Eqns15, 1325–1334

    work page 2002

  47. [47]

    Grunert K & Teschl G (2009) Long-time asymptotics for the Korteweg–de Vries equation via nonlinear steepest descent,Math. Phys. Anal. Geom.12, 287–324

    work page 2009

  48. [48]

    Hastings S P & McLeod J B (1980) A boundary value problem associated with the second Painlev´ e transcendent and the Korteweg–de Vries equation,Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal.73, 31–51

    work page 1980

  49. [49]

    Hayashi N (1991) Analyticity of solutions of the Korteweg-de Vries equation,SIAM J. Math. Anal.22, 1738–1743

    work page 1991

  50. [50]

    Hirota R (1971) Exact solution of the Korteweg–de Vries equation for multiple collisions of solitons, Phys. Rev. Lett.27, 1192–1194. 58

    work page 1971

  51. [51]

    Its A R & Kapaev A A (2003) Quasi-linear Stokes phenomenon for the second Painlev´ e transcendent, Nonlinearity16, 363–386

    work page 2003

  52. [52]

    RIMS40, 1039–1061

    Joshi N (2004) The second Painlev´ e hierarchy and the stationary KdV hierarchy,Publ. RIMS40, 1039–1061

    work page 2004

  53. [53]

    Joshi N & Kruskal M D (1988) An asymptotic approach to the connection problem for the first and the second Painlev´ e equations,Phys. Lett. A130, 129–137

    work page 1988

  54. [54]

    Joshi N & Kruskal M D (1992) The Painlev´ e Connection Problem: An Asymptotic Approach. I,Stud. Appl. Math.86, 315–376

    work page 1992

  55. [55]

    Mag.39, 422–443

    Korteweg D J & de Vries G (1895) On the change of form of long waves advancing in a rectangular canal, and on a new type of long stationary waves,Phil. Mag.39, 422–443

    work page

  56. [56]

    (A75-14987 04-70) Providence, R.I., American Mathematical Society, pp

    Kruskal M D (1974) The Korteweg–de Vries equation and related evolution equations, in: Nonlinear wave motion. (A75-14987 04-70) Providence, R.I., American Mathematical Society, pp. 61–83

    work page 1974

  57. [57]

    Lustri C J, McCue S W & Binder B J (2012) Free surface flow past topography: A beyond-all-orders approach,Euro. J. Appl. Math.23, 441–467

    work page 2012

  58. [58]

    Fluid Mech

    Lustri C J & Chapman S J (2013) Steady gravity waves due to a submerged source,J. Fluid Mech. 732, 660–686

    work page 2013

  59. [59]

    Appl Math.78, 697–713

    Lustri C J, McCue S W & Chapman S J (2013) Exponential asymptotics of free surface flow due to a line source,IMA J. Appl Math.78, 697–713

    work page 2013

  60. [60]

    Lustri C J, Aniceto I, VandenHeuvel D J & McCue S W (2023) Locating complex singularities of Burgers’ equation using exponential asymptotics and transseries,Proc. Roy. Soc. A479, 20230516

    work page 2023

  61. [61]

    Mari˜ no M (2008) Nonperturbative effects and nonperturbative definitions in matrix models and topo- logical strings,J High Energy Phys.2008, 114

    work page 2008

  62. [62]

    Fluid Mech.106, 131–147

    Miles J W (1981) The Korteweg–de Vries equation: a historical essay,J. Fluid Mech.106, 131–147

    work page 1981

  63. [63]

    Miller P D & Sheng Y (2017) Rational solutions of the Painlev´ e-II equation revisited,SIGMA13, 065

    work page 2017

  64. [64]

    Miller P D (2018) On the increasing tritronqu´ ee solutions of the Painlev´ e equation,SIGMA14, 125

    work page 2018

  65. [65]

    D237, 1951–1955

    Matsumoto T, Bec J & Frisch U (2008) Complex-space singularities of 2D Euler flow in Lagrangian coordinates,Phys. D237, 1951–1955

    work page 2008

  66. [66]

    Montanelli H & Bootland N (2020) Solving periodic semilinear stiff PDEs in 1D, 2D and 3D with exponential integrators,Math. Comp. Sim.178, 307–327

    work page 2020

  67. [67]

    Nakatsukasa Y, S` ete O & Trefethen L N (2018) The AAA algorithm for rational approximation,SIAM J. Sci. Comp.40, A1494–A1522. 59

    work page 2018

  68. [68]

    Nakatsukasa Y, S` ete O & Trefethen L N (2024) The first five years of the AAA algorithm, arXiv:2312.03565

    work page arXiv 2024

  69. [69]

    (2024), The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, published electronically athttps://oeis.org

    OEIS Foundation Inc. (2024), The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, published electronically athttps://oeis.org

    work page 2024

  70. [70]

    Olde Daalhuis A B, Chapman S J, King J R, Ockendon J R & Tew R H (1995) Stokes phenomenon and matched asymptotic expansions,SIAM J. Appl. Math.55, 1469–1483

    work page 1995

  71. [71]

    Rosales R R (1978) The similarity solution for the Korteweg–de Vries equation and the related Painlev´ e transcendent,Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A361, 265–275

    work page 1978

  72. [72]

    Schiappa R & Vaz R (2014) The resurgence of instantons: multi-cut Stokes phases and the Painlev´ e II equation,Comm. Math. Phys.330, 655–721

    work page 2014

  73. [73]

    D3, 165–184

    Segur H & Ablowitz M J (1981) Asymptotic solutions of nonlinear evolution equations and a Painlev´ e transcedent,Phys. D3, 165–184

    work page 1981

  74. [74]

    Senouf D (1997) Dynamics and condensation of complex singularities for Burgers’ equation I,SIAM J. Math. Anal.28, 1457–1489

    work page 1997

  75. [75]

    Shen S S (2012)A Course on Nonlinear Waves, Volume 3 of Nonlinear Topics in the Mathematical Sciences, Springer Netherlands

    work page 2012

  76. [76]

    D238, 2368–2379

    Siegel M, Caflisch R E (2009) Calculation of complex singular solutions to the 3D incompressible Euler equations,Phys. D238, 2368–2379

    work page 2009

  77. [77]

    Tanveer S (1993) Evolution of Hele-Shaw interface for small surface tension,Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A343, 155–204

    work page 1993

  78. [78]

    Tanveer S (1993) Singularities in the classical Rayleigh-Taylor flow: formation and subsequent motion, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A441, 501–525

    work page 1993

  79. [79]

    Thickstun W R (1976) A system of particles equivalent to solitons,J. Math. Anal. Appl.55, 335–346

    work page 1976

  80. [80]

    Fluid Mech.685, 413–439

    Trinh P H, Chapman S J & Vanden-Broeck J-M (2011) Do waveless ships exist? Results for single- cornered hulls,J. Fluid Mech.685, 413–439

    work page 2011

Showing first 80 references.