Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 111 references

Cosmological simulations of the same spiral galaxy: satellite properties, the role of baryonic physics and star formation history in shaping dark matter cores/cusps

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Satellite dwarfs that finish forming stars early keep steep dark matter cusps, while late or bursty star formation makes their inner dark matter slope oscillate between core and cusp — a diversity produced within cold dark matter, not again

desk verdict Controlled re-simulation suite shows star-formation timing separates cusps from cores in satellites, with a plausible but not yet proven oscillatory regime driven by tides and late feedback. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.07470 v1 pith:ZSYLV3NU submitted 2025-09-09 astro-ph.GA

A. Nuñez-Castiñeyra , E. Nezri , P. Mollitor , L. Michel-Dansac , J. Devriendt , R. Teyssier This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords darkmattercuspsandcoresdwarfsatellitegalaxiesstarformationhistorybaryonicfeedbacksubhalosurvivaltidalstrippingcosmologicalzoom-insimulationscore-cuspdiversity
topics Dark Matter
open problems Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses a suite of cosmological zoom-in simulations of one Milky-Way-like spiral galaxy, rerun six times with different treatments of gas, star formation, and supernova feedback, to ask what controls the dark matter content of its dwarf satellite galaxies. It argues that the observed diversity of inner dark-matter profiles is not a failure of cold dark matter: it is what the standard model predicts once star formation history and tidal interactions are included. The central result is a timing relation: satellites that assembled 90% of their stellar mass more than 7 Gyr ago end up at redshift zero with a stable cusp, while satellites that formed more than 10% of their stars in the last 5 Gyr have inner slopes that oscillate between core-like and cusp-like values on gigayear timescales. Along the way the paper shows that baryon-rich subhalos resist tidal disruption better, and that host halo concentration, itself modulated by feedback, sets the survival of low-mass dark subhalos. If the timing relation holds, the 'diversity problem' becomes a problem of when and how stars formed, not a sign that dark matter needs new physics.

What carries the argument

The two key quantities are gamma, the logarithmic slope of the dark matter density profile measured within 1 kpc, and t90%, the lookback time by which a galaxy assembled 90% of its stellar mass. The argument follows each resolved subhalo over the last 8 Gyr, tracking gamma alongside enclosed dark matter, stellar and gas mass and the internal and external parts of the gravitational potential, so cusp formation and erosion are tied to specific events in the star formation history and orbit. This tracking is made possible by a subhalo identification method that reconstructs a local gravitational potential for each clump and selects bound particles with an energy criterion, a directional constra

What would settle it

Run the same simulations at higher mass and force resolution and check whether gamma oscillations in late-star-forming satellites persist; if they vanish, the fluctuating regime is numerical. Observationally, measure resolved star formation histories and dark matter inner slopes for a larger sample of Milky Way and Andromeda satellites: if late-forming dwarfs consistently show steep cusps, or early-forming dwarfs show cores, the t90% relation fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the inner dark matter slope of a dwarf satellite, gamma = d ln rho / d ln r inside 1 kpc, is set jointly by star formation history and tidal environment rather than by halo mass or cosmological initial conditions alone. Galaxies whose star formation stalls early keep a stable gravitational potential and therefore retain a steep cusp, sometimes deepening it by adiabatic contraction. Galaxies with recent or extended star formation experience repeated supernova-driven gas outflows that temporarily flatten the cusp into a core, followed by re-contraction as stars accumulate; tidal shocks at pericentric passage add another source of fluctuation. The result is a fluctuating r

Load-bearing premise

The whole timing result rests on the premise that the measured inner dark matter slope within 1 kpc is a numerically converged, physically meaningful quantity even in small, heavily tidally stripped satellites; the paper flags that insufficient resolution can inflate remnant sizes and distort tidal evolution, so part of the oscillating regime could be numerical.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Cusps and cores are not a bimodal halo property: the same satellite can pass through both states, so single-epoch inner-slope measurements for late-forming dwarfs should be interpreted with caution.
  • Surveys of Local Group satellites can test the relation directly: dwarfs with early truncated star formation should consistently show steep inner slopes, while late-forming dwarfs should show much larger scatter.
  • Because baryon-rich subhalos are harder to destroy, the satellite stellar mass function is coupled to feedback physics; simulations with the strongest feedback produce fewer, more massive surviving satellites.
  • Host halo concentration, changed by baryonic feedback, becomes a population-level predictor: more concentrated hosts destroy more low-mass dark subhalos, which links the host's inner dark matter profile to its satellite demographics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A sharper observational test would use SFH measurements for a larger sample of dwarfs beyond the Local Group, comparing t90% to inner slopes; the paper's handful of Local Group dwarfs is suggestive but small.
  • If the oscillating regime is physical, theoretical predictions of dark matter annihilation or gravitational lensing in dwarf satellites should use time-averaged central densities rather than the instantaneous gamma.
  • A decisive numerical check is to rerun the same suite at higher resolution: the early-truncation cusps should remain steep and stable, while the late-star-forming oscillations should persist; if they disappear, the fluctuating regime is at least partly a resolution artifact.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper analyzes subhalo properties in the Mochima suite, a set of zoom-in simulations of the same Milky-Way-like host run with a dark-matter-only baseline and five baryonic prescriptions that vary the star formation and supernova feedback models. A refined phase-space subhalo identification method is introduced, and the authors use it to study subhalo survival, stellar content, mass spectra, and the inner dark-matter slope gamma of the resolved satellites. The central claim is an emergent correlation between star formation timing and inner structure: galaxies that formed 90% of their stellar mass more than 7 Gyr ago tend to retain stable cusps at z=0, while galaxies with late or extended star formation show oscillating inner slopes that alternate between core-like and cusp-like values. This is compared with Local Group dwarf data, and the authors argue that the observed diversity of inner profiles can arise within LCDM from the interplay of feedback history and tidal environment.

Significance. If correct, the t90%-gamma relation would be a valuable physical explanation for the dwarf galaxy diversity problem, connecting star formation timing and tidal interactions to core/cusp structure. The controlled same-host suite is a genuine strength: it isolates the effect of subgrid baryonic physics while holding initial conditions fixed, and the population-level trends (host concentration, potential depth, stellar binding, survival) are plausible and well aligned with external results. The paper also makes a good-faith comparison with independent Local Group observations and cites its own limitations explicitly. However, the central claim currently rests on a small, non-independent sample and on gamma measurements in heavily stripped subhalos for which no resolution convergence test is provided. The result is therefore promising and potentially important, but not yet established at the level claimed.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4 / Figure 6-9] The central claim rests on gamma(t) tracks in tidally stripped subhalos, but no resolution-convergence test for gamma is presented. The paper itself cites Borukhovetskaya et al. (2022) [110] and warns that insufficient resolution can inflate remnant sizes, yet the only safeguard is the selection threshold M_sub > 80 m_p (Section 2.1), with m_p ~= 1.9e5 Msun. After tidal stripping, the number of particles within 1 kpc can be far smaller, and the oscillating core/cusp regime could be numerical rather than physical. A dedicated convergence test, or at least a conservative particle-number cut with a repeat of the t90%-gamma analysis, is required before the oscillating regime can be interpreted as a real dynamical phenomenon.
  2. [Section 4 / Figure 7] The split at t90% = 7 Gyr appears to be chosen after inspecting the figure and is not statistically validated. The text also uses a different criterion ('more than 10% of the stellar mass assembled within the last 5 Gyr'), which is not equivalent to t90% < 7 Gyr. Please specify the operational definition, report how many objects fall on each side of the threshold, and test the significance of the correlation (e.g., a rank correlation with a permutation test). Without this, the qualitative visual impression in Figure 7 is not sufficient support for a central claim.
  3. [Section 3.3 / Figure 7] The resolved sample is only ~8-9 subhalos per baryonic run, and many of these are the same Lagrangian halos re-simulated with different feedback models, so the effective number of independent systems is small. The shaded evolutionary tracks in Figure 7 compress 8 Gyr of gamma(t) into a 1 Gyr interval in t90% space, visually multiplying the number of points and potentially making the correlation look stronger than it is for z=0 objects. The z=0 relation should be shown separately with proper error bars, and the compressed tracks should not be treated as independent data points.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.3] The text says halo F 'continues forming stars until approximately 5 Myr ago'; given the lookback-time axes in Figure 6, this should presumably be '5 Gyr ago'.
  2. [Figure 7] Draco and WLM appear twice in the inner panel because they are drawn from different data sources. Please distinguish the duplicates with different markers or list them explicitly in the caption.
  3. [Appendix A] The phase-space selection uses several empirically chosen thresholds (d6D < 10, 90 and 135 degree angles). No sensitivity test is shown for these choices. Since the main population trends are robust, this is not blocking, but a brief robustness statement would help.
  4. [Section 2.1] The subhalo identification method is described in detail, but there is no quantitative validation against other finders or against known recovery/incompleteness curves for the adopted set of thresholds. A comparison with a standard finder in one run would strengthen the methodological claims.
  5. [Section 3.1] The SHMR comparison notes that simulated stellar masses are 'systematically higher' than observational constraints, but no offset or scatter is quantified. Reporting the median offset and its run-to-run range would make the statement more precise.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the t90%-gamma correlation is an emergent simulation result, not a fitted input; self-citations are methodological reuse.

full rationale

The central claim—that galaxies forming 90% of their stellar mass more than 7 Gyr ago retain stable cusps, while those with recent star formation show oscillating inner slopes—is not circular. The inner dark matter slope gamma is measured from simulated density profiles using an MCMC fitting procedure (Paper 2) and independently from literature observations; the star formation history is measured separately as t90% from cumulative SFH curves. Neither quantity is defined in terms of the other, and no parameter is fitted to bring them into correlation. The relation in Figure 7 is an emergent property of the simulations and is benchmarked against external observational data (Weisz et al. 2014 and independent gamma measurements). Self-citations to Paper 1 and Paper 2 supply simulation setup, host concentration values, and gamma-fitting methodology; these are legitimate reuse of previously published results and do not smuggle in the t90%-gamma relation. The paper also explicitly flags a numerical-resolution caveat for heavily stripped low-mass subhalos (Section 4, citing Borukhovetskaya et al. 2022). That is a correctness risk rather than a circularity step, because it concerns whether the measured gamma tracks are converged, not whether the claimed correlation is built into the measurement procedure. No derivation step reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central analysis rests on the validity of the subgrid baryonic recipes, on the representativeness of one simulated host, and on the robustness of measured inner slopes within 1 kpc. Free parameters include empirically chosen phase-space thresholds, the epsilon values bracketing feedback strength, a resolution-based mass cut, and a post-hoc t90% split. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • Protostellar feedback efficiency epsilon = 0.09 and 1.0
    Extreme values chosen in Paper 1 to bracket the strength of protostellar feedback; the spread in subhalo properties across runs depends on these hand-picked inputs.
  • Phase-space threshold d6D < 10 and angle criteria (90 and 135 degrees) = d6D = 10, angles 90/135 deg
    Empirically chosen in Appendix A to separate strongly bound from loosely bound particles; no independent physical calibration is provided.
  • Minimum subhalo mass for selection = 80 times the dark matter particle mass
    Resolution cut adopted in Section 2.1; it defines the resolved subhalo sample and thus shapes all reported mass functions and gamma statistics.
  • t90% split threshold of 7 Gyr = 7 Gyr
    Post-hoc division of the sample into early and late star-forming regimes, introduced in Section 4 after inspecting the gamma-t90% distribution in Figure 7.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The RAMSES subgrid models (KSlaw, Mff, DCool, MecFB) approximate the real baryonic physics of dwarf galaxies.
    All conclusions about cores and cusps depend on the fidelity of these sub-resolution recipes, which are taken from Paper 1.
  • domain assumption The Mochima galaxy and its environment are representative enough for inference about Local Group satellite populations.
    The comparison to MW/M31 satellites and Local Group dwarfs assumes that one simulated host, re-simulated six times, provides a fair sample.
  • domain assumption The inner slope gamma measured within 1 kpc from bound particles is a robust estimator of the physical dark matter density slope at resolved radii.
    Used throughout Section 3.3; the authors themselves note in Section 4 that numerical resolution can affect the structural response of subhalos to tides.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Cosmological simulations of the same spiral galaxy: satellite properties, the role of baryonic physics and star formation history in shaping dark matter cores/cusps." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZSYLV3NU

@misc{pith2026250907470,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Cosmological simulations of the same spiral galaxy: satellite properties, the role of baryonic physics and star formation history in shaping dark matter cores/cusps},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZSYLV3NU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.07470}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate the role of baryonic physics in shaping the population, structure, and internal dynamics of galactic subhalos using the Mochima suite of cosmological zoom-in simulations. A refined method is developed to identify bound subhalo material by isolating the local gravitational potential and applying multi-criteria phase-space selection. This approach enables a robust characterisation of subhalo properties across five baryonic runs with varying prescriptions for star formation, and supernova and protostellar feedback, as well as a dark matter-only baseline. At the population level, we find that host halo concentration, modulated by baryonic feedback, is a key predictor of subhalo survival. Subhalos with more massive stellar components exhibit deeper internal potentials and enhanced resilience to tidal disruption. At the structural level, we identify a broad diversity in inner dark matter profiles, consistent with observations of dwarf galaxies. We show that this diversity correlates with both star formation history and environmental interaction. In particular, galaxies that form most of their stars early tend to retain steep cusps, while those with extended or recent star formation exhibit oscillating inner slopes shaped by bursty feedback and tidal perturbations. These findings suggest that the so-called "diversity problem" may reflect the complex interplay between feedback history and gravitational environment, rather than a breakdown of cold dark matter predictions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

111 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [110]

    Borukhovetskaya, J

    A. Borukhovetskaya, J. F. Navarro, R. Errani and A. Fattahi, Galactic tides and the Crater II dwarf spheroidal: a challenge to LCDM?,MNRAS512 (2022) 5247 [2112.01540]

    arXiv 2022

  2. [1]

    S. D. M. White and M. J. Rees, Core condensation in heavy halos: a two-stage theory for galaxy formation and clustering., MNRAS183(1978) 341

    1978

  3. [2]

    R. H. Wechsler and J. L. Tinker, The Connection Between Galaxies and Their Dark Matter Halos, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.56(2018) 435 [1804.03097]

    arXiv 2018

  4. [3]

    Hayashi, J

    E. Hayashi, J. F. Navarro, J. E. Taylor, J. Stadel and T. Quinn, The Structural Evolution of Substructure,Astrophys. J.584(2003) 541 [astro-ph/0203004]

    arXiv 2003

  5. [4]

    Moore, S

    B. Moore, S. Gelato, A. Jenkins, F. R. Pearce and V. Quilis, Collisional versus Collisionless Dark Matter,Astrophys. J. Lett.535(2000) L21 [astro-ph/0002308]

    arXiv 2000

  6. [5]

    Onions, A

    J. Onions, A. Knebe, F. R. Pearce, S. I. Muldrew, H. Lux, S. R. Knollmann et al., Subhaloes going Notts: the subhalo-finder comparison project,MNRAS423(2012) 1200 [1203.3695]

    arXiv 2012

  7. [6]

    Mansfield, E

    P. Mansfield, E. Darragh-Ford, Y. Wang, E. O. Nadler, B. Diemer and R. H. Wechsler, SYMFIND : Addressing the Fragility of Subhalo Finders and Revealing the Durability of Subhalos, Astrophys. J.970(2024) 178 [2308.10926]

    arXiv 2024

  8. [7]

    Pathak, C

    D. Pathak, C. R. Christensen, A. M. Brooks, F. Munshi, A. C. Wright and C. Carter, Survivors and Zombies: The Quenching and Disruption of Satellites around Milky Way Analogs, arXiv e-prints (2025) arXiv:2505.22742 [2505.22742]

    arXiv 2025

Show all 111 references
  1. [8]

    Boylan-Kolchin, J

    M. Boylan-Kolchin, J. S. Bullock and M. Kaplinghat, Too big to fail? The puzzling darkness of massive Milky Way subhaloes,MNRAS415(2011) L40 [1103.0007]

    2011 arXiv

  2. [9]

    W. J. G. de Blok, F. Walter, E. Brinks, C. Trachternach, S. H. Oh and R. C. Kennicutt, Jr., High-Resolution Rotation Curves and Galaxy Mass Models from THINGS,Astron. J.136 (2008) 2648 [0810.2100]

    2008 arXiv

  3. [10]

    S.-H. Oh, C. Brook, F. Governato, E. Brinks, L. Mayer, W. J. G. de Blok et al., The Central Slope of Dark Matter Cores in Dwarf Galaxies: Simulations versus THINGS, Astron. J.142(2011) 24 [1011.2777]. – 22 –

    2011 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Moore, Evidence against dissipation-less dark matter from observations of galaxy haloes, Nature370(1994) 629

    B. Moore, Evidence against dissipation-less dark matter from observations of galaxy haloes, Nature370(1994) 629

    1994

  5. [12]

    R. A. Flores and J. R. Primack, Observational and Theoretical Constraints on Singular Dark Matter Halos, Astrophys. J. Lett.427(1994) L1 [astro-ph/9402004]

    1994 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Del Popolo and M

    A. Del Popolo and M. Le Delliou, Review of Solutions to the Cusp-Core Problem of theΛCDM Model,Galaxies9(2021) 123 [2209.14151]

    2021 arXiv

  7. [14]

    K. A. Oman, J. F. Navarro, A. Fattahi, C. S. Frenk, T. Sawala, S. D. M. White et al., The unexpected diversity of dwarf galaxy rotation curves,MNRAS452(2015) 3650 [1504.01437]

    2015 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Zolotov, A

    A. Zolotov, A. M. Brooks, B. Willman, F. Governato, A. Pontzen, C. Christensen et al., Baryons Matter: Why Luminous Satellite Galaxies have Reduced Central Masses, Astrophys. J.761(2012) 71 [1207.0007]

    2012 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Del Popolo, J

    A. Del Popolo, J. A. S. Lima, J. C. Fabris and D. C. Rodrigues, A unified solution to the small scale problems of theΛCDM model,JCAP2014(2014) 021 [1404.3674]

    2014 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Mashchenko, H

    S. Mashchenko, H. M. P. Couchman and J. Wadsley, The removal of cusps from galaxy centres by stellar feedback in the early Universe,Nature 442(2006) 539 [astro-ph/0605672]

    2006 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Mashchenko, J

    S. Mashchenko, J. Wadsley and H. M. P. Couchman, Stellar Feedback in Dwarf Galaxy Formation,Science319(2008) 174 [0711.4803]

    2008 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Peñarrubia, A

    J. Peñarrubia, A. J. Benson, M. G. Walker, G. Gilmore, A. W. McConnachie and L. Mayer, The impact of dark matter cusps and cores on the satellite galaxy population around spiral galaxies, MNRAS406(2010) 1290 [1002.3376]

    2010 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Errani, J

    R. Errani, J. F. Navarro, J. Peñarrubia, B. Famaey and R. Ibata, Dark matter halo cores and the tidal survival of Milky Way satellites,MNRAS519(2023) 384 [2210.01131]

    2023 arXiv

  14. [21]

    B. M. Celiz, J. F. Navarro, M. G. Abadi and V. Springel, Mass-morphology relation of TNG50 galaxies,Astron. Astroph.699(2025) A12 [2505.01620]

    2025 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Sommer-Larsen and A

    J. Sommer-Larsen and A. Dolgov, Formation of Disk Galaxies: Warm Dark Matter and the Angular Momentum Problem, Astrophys. J.551(2001) 608 [astro-ph/9912166]

    2001 arXiv

  16. [23]

    P. J. E. Peebles,Fluid Dark Matter,Astrophys. J. Lett.534(2000) L127 [astro-ph/0002495]

    2000 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Goodman, Repulsive dark matter,na5(2000) 103 [astro-ph/0003018]

    J. Goodman, Repulsive dark matter,na5(2000) 103 [astro-ph/0003018]

    2000 arXiv

  18. [25]

    W. Hu, R. Barkana and A. Gruzinov, Fuzzy Cold Dark Matter: The Wave Properties of Ultralight Particles,Phys. Rev. Lett.85 (2000) 1158 [astro-ph/0003365]

    2000 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Cen,Decaying Cold Dark Matter Model and Small-Scale Power,Astrophys

    R. Cen,Decaying Cold Dark Matter Model and Small-Scale Power,Astrophys. J. Lett.546 (2001) L77 [astro-ph/0005206]

    2001 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Kaplinghat, L

    M. Kaplinghat, L. Knox and M. S. Turner,Annihilating Cold Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. Lett. 85(2000) 3335 [astro-ph/0005210]

    2000 arXiv

  21. [28]

    D. N. Spergel and P. J. Steinhardt, – 23 – Observational Evidence for Self-Interacting Cold Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. Lett.84(2000) 3760 [astro-ph/9909386]

    2000 arXiv

  22. [29]

    A. R. Zentner and J. S. Bullock,Halo Substructure and the Power Spectrum,Astrophys. J. 598(2003) 49 [astro-ph/0304292]

    2003 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Milgrom,A modification of the Newtonian dynamics - Implications for galaxies., Astrophys

    M. Milgrom,A modification of the Newtonian dynamics - Implications for galaxies., Astrophys. J.270(1983) 371

    1983

  24. [31]

    Milgrom, A modification of the Newtonian dynamics as a possible alternative to the hidden mass hypothesis., Astrophys

    M. Milgrom, A modification of the Newtonian dynamics as a possible alternative to the hidden mass hypothesis., Astrophys. J.270(1983) 365

    1983

  25. [32]

    H. A. Buchdahl,Non-linear Lagrangians and cosmological theory,MNRAS150(1970) 1

    1970

  26. [33]

    A. A. Starobinsky,A new type of isotropic cosmological models without singularity,Physics Letters B91(1980) 99

    1980

  27. [34]

    G. R. Bengochea and R. Ferraro,Dark torsion as the cosmic speed-up,Phys. Rev. D79 (2009) 124019 [0812.1205]

    2009 arXiv

  28. [35]

    J. B. Dent, S. Dutta and E. N. Saridakis, f(T) gravity mimicking dynamical dark energy. Background and perturbation analysis,JCAP 2011(2011) 009 [1010.2215]

    2011 arXiv

  29. [36]

    W. J. G. de Blok, S. S. McGaugh, A. Bosma and V. C. Rubin, Mass Density Profiles of Low Surface Brightness Galaxies,Astrophys. J. Lett.552(2001) L23 [astro-ph/0103102]

    2001 arXiv

  30. [37]

    W. J. G. de Blok, A. Bosma and S. McGaugh, Simulating observations of dark matter dominated galaxies: towards the optimal halo profile, MNRAS340(2003) 657 [astro-ph/0212102]

    2003 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Power, J

    C. Power, J. Navarro, A. Jenkins, C. Frenk, S. D. White, V. Springel et al., The Inner structure of Lambda CDM halos. 1. A Numerical convergence study,Mon. Not. Roy.Astron. Soc.338(2003) 14 [astro-ph/0201544]

    2003 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Di Cintio, C

    A. Di Cintio, C. B. Brook, A. V. Macciò, G. S. Stinson, A. Knebe, A. A. Dutton et al., The dependence of dark matter profiles on the stellar-to-halo mass ratio: a prediction for cusps versus cores, Mon. Not. Roy.Astron. Soc.437(2014) 415 [1306.0898]

    2014 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Tollet, A

    E. Tollet, A. V. Macciò, A. A. Dutton, G. S. Stinson, L. Wang, C. Penzo et al., NIHAO - IV: core creation and destruction in dark matter density profiles across cosmic time, MNRAS456(2016) 3542 [1507.03590]

    2016 arXiv

  34. [41]

    T. K. Chan, D. Kereš, J. Oñorbe, P. F. Hopkins, A. L. Muratov, C. A. Faucher-Giguère et al., The impact of baryonic physics on the structure of dark matter haloes: the view from the FIRE cosmological simulations, MNRAS454(2015) 2981 [1507.02282]

    2015 arXiv

  35. [42]

    R. A. Jackson, S. Kaviraj, S. K. Yi, S. Peirani, Y. Dubois, G. Martin et al., The formation of cores in galaxies across cosmic time - the existence of cores is not in tension with theΛCDM paradigm, MNRAS528(2024) 1655 [2310.13055]

    2024 arXiv

  36. [43]

    J. I. Read, O. Agertz and M. L. M. Collins,Dark matter cores all the way down,MNRAS 459(2016) 2573 [1508.04143]

    2016 arXiv

  37. [44]

    S. Bose, C. S. Frenk, A. Jenkins, A. Fattahi, F. A. Gómez, R. J. J. Grand et al., No cores in dark matter-dominated dwarf galaxies with bursty star formation histories, MNRAS486(2019) 4790 [1810.03635]

    2019 arXiv

  38. [45]

    Richings, C

    J. Richings, C. Frenk, A. Jenkins, A. Robertson, A. Fattahi, R. J. J. Grand et al., Subhalo destruction in the APOSTLE and AURIGA simulations,MNRAS492(2020) 5780 [1811.12437]. – 24 –

    2020 arXiv

  39. [46]

    Nuñez-Castiñeyra, E

    A. Nuñez-Castiñeyra, E. Nezri, J. Devriendt and R. Teyssier, Cosmological simulations of the same spiral galaxy: the impact of baryonic physics,arXiv e-prints (2020) arXiv:2004.06008 [2004.06008]

    2020 arXiv

  40. [47]

    E. J. Tollerud, J. S. Bullock, L. E. Strigari and B. Willman, Hundreds of Milky Way Satellites? Luminosity Bias in the Satellite Luminosity Function, Astrophys. J.688(2008) 277 [0806.4381]

    2008 arXiv

  41. [48]

    A. W. McConnachie, The Observed Properties of Dwarf Galaxies in and around the Local Group,Astron. J.144 (2012) 4 [1204.1562]

    2012 arXiv

  42. [49]

    Fattahi, J

    A. Fattahi, J. F. Navarro, T. Sawala, C. S. Frenk, L. V. Sales, K. Oman et al., The cold dark matter content of Galactic dwarf spheroidals: no cores, no failures, no problem, arXiv e-prints (2016) arXiv:1607.06479 [1607.06479]

    2016 arXiv

  43. [50]

    Dubois, R

    Y. Dubois, R. Beckmann, F. Bournaud, H. Choi, J. Devriendt, R. Jackson et al., Introducing the NEWHORIZON simulation: Galaxy properties with resolved internal dynamics across cosmic time, Astron. Astroph.651(2021) A109 [2009.10578]

    2021 arXiv

  44. [51]

    R. J. J. Grand, F. A. Gómez, F. Marinacci, R. Pakmor, V. Springel, D. J. R. Campbell et al., The Auriga Project: the properties and formation mechanisms of disc galaxies across cosmic time, MNRAS467(2017) 179 [1610.01159]

    2017 arXiv

  45. [52]

    Nuñez-Castiñeyra, E

    A. Nuñez-Castiñeyra, E. Nezri, P. Mollitor, J. Devriendt and R. Teyssier, Cosmological simulations of the same spiral galaxy: connecting the dark matter distribution of the host halo with the subgrid baryonic physics, JCAP2023(2023) 012 [2301.06189]

    2023 arXiv

  46. [53]

    A. R. Wetzel, P. F. Hopkins, J.-h. Kim, C.-A. Faucher-Giguère, D. Kereš and E. Quataert, Reconciling Dwarf Galaxies withΛCDM Cosmology: Simulating a Realistic Population of Satellites around a Milky Way-mass Galaxy, Astrophys. J. Lett.827(2016) L23 [1602.05957]

    2016 arXiv

  47. [54]

    Teyssier, Cosmological hydrodynamics with adaptive mesh refinement: a new high resolution code called ramses, Astron

    R. Teyssier, Cosmological hydrodynamics with adaptive mesh refinement: a new high resolution code called ramses, Astron. Astrophys.385(2002) 337 [astro-ph/0111367]

    2002 arXiv

  48. [55]

    MUSIC: MUlti-Scale Initial Conditions

    O. Hahn and T. Abel, “MUSIC: MUlti-Scale Initial Conditions.” Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1311.011, Nov., 2013

    2013

  49. [56]

    Mollitor, E

    P. Mollitor, E. Nezri and R. Teyssier, Baryonic and dark matter distribution in cosmological simulations of spiral galaxies,MNRAS 447(2015) 1353 [1405.4318]

    2015 arXiv

  50. [57]

    Marinacci, R

    F. Marinacci, R. Pakmor and V. Springel, The formation of disc galaxies in high resolution moving-mesh cosmological simulations, MNRAS437(2014) 1750 [1305.5360]

    2014 arXiv

  51. [58]

    Kennicutt, Robert C.,The Global Schmidt Law in Star-forming Galaxies,Astrophys

    J. Kennicutt, Robert C.,The Global Schmidt Law in Star-forming Galaxies,Astrophys. J. 498(1998) 541 [astro-ph/9712213]

    1998 arXiv

  52. [59]

    Teyssier, A

    R. Teyssier, A. Pontzen, Y. Dubois and J. I. Read, Cusp-core transformations in dwarf galaxies: observational predictions,MNRAS429(2013) 3068 [1206.4895]

    2013 arXiv

  53. [60]

    Federrath and R

    C. Federrath and R. S. Klessen, The Star Formation Rate of Turbulent Magnetized Clouds: Comparing Theory, Simulations, and Observations, Astrophys. J.761(2012) 156 [1209.2856]

    2012 arXiv

  54. [61]

    M. R. Krumholz and C. F. McKee, A General Theory of Turbulence-regulated Star Formation, from Spirals to Ultraluminous Infrared Galaxies, Astrophys. J.630(2005) 250 [astro-ph/0505177]. – 25 –

    2005 arXiv

  55. [62]

    T. Kimm, R. Cen, J. Devriendt, Y. Dubois and A. Slyz, Towards simulating star formation in turbulent high-z galaxies with mechanical supernova feedback, MNRAS451(2015) 2900 [1501.05655]

    2015 arXiv

  56. [63]

    Camps and M

    P. Camps and M. Baes, SKIRT: An advanced dust radiative transfer code with a user-friendly architecture, Astronomy and Computing9(2015) 20 [1410.1629]

    2015 arXiv

  57. [64]

    Springel, J

    V. Springel, J. Wang, M. Vogelsberger, A. Ludlow, A. Jenkins, A. Helmi et al., The Aquarius Project: the subhalos of galactic halos,Mon. Not. Roy.Astron. Soc.391(2008) 1685 [0809.0898]

    2008 arXiv

  58. [65]

    Binney and S

    J. Binney and S. Tremaine,Galactic dynamics, vol. 13. Princeton university press, 2011

    2011

  59. [66]

    J. P. Huchra and M. J. Geller,Groups of Galaxies. I. Nearby groups,Astrophys. J.257 (1982) 423

    1982

  60. [67]

    Davis, G

    M. Davis, G. Efstathiou, C. S. Frenk and S. D. M. White, The evolution of large-scale structure in a universe dominated by cold dark matter, Astrophys. J.292(1985) 371

    1985

  61. [68]

    Maciejewski, S

    M. Maciejewski, S. Colombi, V. Springel, C. Alard and F. R. Bouchet, Phase-space structures - II. Hierarchical Structure Finder,MNRAS396(2009) 1329 [0812.0288]

    2009 arXiv

  62. [69]

    Rockstar: Phase-space halo finder

    P. Behroozi, R. Wechsler and H.-Y. Wu, “Rockstar: Phase-space halo finder.” Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1210.008, Oct., 2012

    2012

  63. [70]

    Vladimir, C

    Z. Vladimir, C. Osinga, B. Diemer, E. M. Salazar and E. Rozo, Distinguishing Orbiting and Infalling Dark Matter Particles with Machine Learning,arXiv e-prints (2025) arXiv:2506.09146 [2506.09146]

    2025

  64. [71]

    Springel, S

    V. Springel, S. D. M. White, G. Tormen and G. Kauffmann, Populating a cluster of galaxies - I. Results at z=0,MNRAS328(2001) 726 [astro-ph/0012055]

    2001 arXiv

  65. [72]

    L. Gao, C. S. Frenk, M. Boylan-Kolchin, A. Jenkins, V. Springel and S. D. M. White, The statistics of the subhalo abundance of dark matter haloes,MNRAS410(2011) 2309 [1006.2882]

    2011 arXiv

  66. [73]

    Errani, J

    R. Errani, J. Peñarrubia and M. G. Walker, Systematics in virial mass estimators for pressure-supported systems,MNRAS481(2018) 5073 [1805.00484]

    2018 arXiv

  67. [74]

    E. O. Nadler, R. H. Wechsler, K. Bechtol, Y. Y. Mao, G. Green, A. Drlica-Wagner et al., Milky Way Satellite Census. II. Galaxy-Halo Connection Constraints Including the Impact of the Large Magellanic Cloud, Astrophys. J.893(2020) 48 [1912.03303]

    2020 arXiv

  68. [75]

    P. S. Behroozi, R. H. Wechsler and C. Conroy, The Average Star Formation Histories of Galaxies in Dark Matter Halos from z = 0-8, Astrophys. J.770(2013) 57 [1207.6105]

    2013 arXiv

  69. [76]

    B. P. Moster, R. S. Somerville, C. Maulbetsch, F. C. van den Bosch, A. V. Macciò, T. Naab et al., Constraints on the Relationship between Stellar Mass and Halo Mass at Low and High Redshift, Astrophys. J.710(2010) 903 [0903.4682]

    2010 arXiv

  70. [77]

    Danieli, J

    S. Danieli, J. E. Greene, S. Carlsten, F. Jiang, R. Beaton and A. D. Goulding, ELVES. IV. The Satellite Stellar-to-halo Mass Relation Beyond the Milky Way,Astrophys. J. 956(2023) 6 [2210.14233]. – 26 –

    2023 arXiv

  71. [78]

    Rodríguez-Puebla, N

    A. Rodríguez-Puebla, N. Drory and V. Avila-Reese, The Stellar-Subhalo Mass Relation of Satellite Galaxies,Astrophys. J.756(2012) 2 [1204.0804]

    2012 arXiv

  72. [79]

    Applebaum, A

    E. Applebaum, A. M. Brooks, C. R. Christensen, F. Munshi, T. R. Quinn, S. Shen et al., Ultrafaint Dwarfs in a Milky Way Context: Introducing the Mint Condition DC Justice League Simulations, Astrophys. J.906(2021) 96 [2008.11207]

    2021 arXiv

  73. [80]

    Diemand, M

    J. Diemand, M. Kuhlen and P. Madau, Formation and evolution of galaxy dark matter halos and their substructure,Astrophys. J. 667(2007) 859 [astro-ph/0703337]

    2007 arXiv

  74. [81]

    J. Wang, S. Bose, C. S. Frenk, L. Gao, A. Jenkins, V. Springel et al., Universal structure of dark matter haloes over a mass range of 20 orders of magnitude, Nature585(2020) 39 [1911.09720]

    2020

  75. [82]

    W. H. Press and P. Schechter, Formation of Galaxies and Clusters of Galaxies by Self-Similar Gravitational Condensation, Astrophys. J.187(1974) 425

    1974

  76. [83]

    J. R. Bond, S. Cole, G. Efstathiou and N. Kaiser, Excursion Set Mass Functions for Hierarchical Gaussian Fluctuations,Astrophys. J.379 (1991) 440

    1991

  77. [84]

    Lacey and S

    C. Lacey and S. Cole,Merger rates in hierarchical models of galaxy formation,MNRAS262 (1993) 627

    1993

  78. [85]

    Tormen, A

    G. Tormen, A. Diaferio and D. Syer,Survival of substructure within dark matter haloes, MNRAS299(1998) 728 [astro-ph/9712222]

    1998 arXiv

  79. [86]

    A. R. Zentner, The Excursion Set Theory of Halo Mass Functions, Halo Clustering, and Halo Growth, International Journal of Modern Physics D16(2007) 763 [astro-ph/0611454]

    2007 arXiv

  80. [87]

    R. S. Somerville and J. R. Primack, Semi-analytic modelling of galaxy formation: the local Universe,MNRAS310(1999) 1087 [astro-ph/9802268]

    1999 arXiv

  81. [88]

    S. Jeon, S. K. Yi, E. Contini, Y. Dubois, S. Han, K. Kraljic et al., Born to be Starless: Revisiting the Missing Satellite Problem,arXiv e-prints (2025) arXiv:2506.09152 [2506.09152]

    2025 arXiv

  82. [89]

    Governato et al., At the heart of the matter: the origin of bulgeless dwarf galaxies and Dark Matter cores, Nature463(2010) 203 [0911.2237]

    F. Governato et al., At the heart of the matter: the origin of bulgeless dwarf galaxies and Dark Matter cores, Nature463(2010) 203 [0911.2237]

    2010 arXiv

  83. [90]

    Pontzen and F

    A. Pontzen and F. Governato,How supernova feedback turns dark matter cusps into cores, MNRAS421(2012) 3464 [1106.0499]

    2012 arXiv

  84. [91]

    A. A. El-Zant, J. Freundlich and F. Combes,From cusps to cores: a stochastic model, MNRAS461(2016) 1745 [1603.00526]

    2016 arXiv

  85. [92]

    Freundlich, A

    J. Freundlich, A. Dekel, F. Jiang, G. Ishai, N. Cornuault, S. Lapiner et al., A model for core formation in dark matter haloes and ultra-diffuse galaxies by outflow episodes, MNRAS491(2020) 4523 [1907.11726]

    2020 arXiv

  86. [93]

    Z. Li, A. Dekel, N. Mandelker, J. Freundlich and T. L. François, The response of dark matter haloes to gas ejection: CuspCore II,MNRAS518(2023) 5356 [2206.07069]

    2023 arXiv

  87. [94]

    Tollet, A

    É. Tollet, A. Cattaneo, G. A. Mamon, T. Moutard and F. C. van den Bosch, On stellar mass loss from galaxies in groups and clusters,MNRAS471(2017) 4170 [1707.06264]. – 27 –

    2017 arXiv

  88. [95]

    Di Cintio, C

    A. Di Cintio, C. B. Brook, A. A. Dutton, A. V. Macciò, A. Obreja and A. Dekel, NIHAO - XI. Formation of ultra-diffuse galaxies by outflows,MNRAS466(2017) L1 [1608.01327]

    2017 arXiv

  89. [96]

    Fitts, M

    A. Fitts, M. Boylan-Kolchin, O. D. Elbert, J. S. Bullock, P. F. Hopkins, J. Oñorbe et al., fire in the field: simulating the threshold of galaxy formation,MNRAS471(2017) 3547 [1611.02281]

    2017 arXiv

  90. [97]

    Dekel, J

    A. Dekel, J. Freundlich, F. Jiang, S. Lapiner, A. Burkert, D. Ceverino et al., Core formation in high-z massive haloes: heating by post-compaction satellites and response to AGN outflows, MNRAS508(2021) 999 [2106.01378]

    2021 arXiv

  91. [98]

    Hashim, A

    M. Hashim, A. A. El-Zant, J. Freundlich, J. I. Read and F. Combes, Halo heating from fluctuating gas in a model dwarf,MNRAS521(2023) 772 [2209.08631]

    2023 arXiv

  92. [99]

    D. R. Weisz, A. E. Dolphin, E. D. Skillman, J. Holtzman, K. M. Gilbert, J. J. Dalcanton et al., The Star Formation Histories of Local Group Dwarf Galaxies. I. Hubble Space Telescope/Wide Field Planetary Camera 2 Observations, Astrophys. J.789(2014) 147 [1404.7144]

    2014 arXiv

  93. [100]

    Jiang, A

    F. Jiang, A. Dekel, J. Freundlich, A. J. Romanowsky, A. A. Dutton, A. V. Macciò et al., Formation of ultra-diffuse galaxies in the field and in galaxy groups,MNRAS487(2019) 5272 [1811.10607]

    2019 arXiv

  94. [101]

    Errani and J

    R. Errani and J. Peñarrubia,Can tides disrupt cold dark matter subhaloes?,MNRAS491 (2020) 4591 [1906.01642]

    2020 arXiv

  95. [102]

    J. I. Read, M. G. Walker and P. Steger,Dark matter heats up in dwarf galaxies,MNRAS484 (2019) 1401 [1808.06634]

    2019 arXiv

  96. [103]

    S.-H. Oh, D. A. Hunter, E. Brinks, B. G. Elmegreen, A. Schruba, F. Walter et al., High-resolution Mass Models of Dwarf Galaxies from LITTLE THINGS,Astron. J.149 (2015) 180 [1502.01281]

    2015 arXiv

  97. [104]

    Vitral, R

    E. Vitral, R. P. van der Marel, S. T. Sohn, M. Libralato, A. del Pino, L. L. Watkins et al., HSTPROMO Internal Proper-motion Kinematics of Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies. I. Velocity Anisotropy and Dark Matter Cusp Slope of Draco, Astrophys. J.970(2024) 1 [2407.07769]

    2024 arXiv

  98. [105]

    Pascale, C

    R. Pascale, C. Nipoti, F. Calura and A. Della Croce, Leo I: the classical dwarf spheroidal galaxy with the highest dark-matter density,arXiv e-prints (2025) arXiv:2506.13847 [2506.13847]

    2025 arXiv

  99. [106]

    H. Yang, W. Wang, L. Zhu, T. S. Li, S. E. Koposov, J. Han et al., The dark matter content of Milky Way dwarf spheroidal galaxies: Draco, Sextans and Ursa Minor, arXiv e-prints (2025) arXiv:2507.02284 [2507.02284]

    2025

  100. [107]

    A. A. Dutton, A. V. Macciò, T. Buck, K. L. Dixon, M. Blank and A. Obreja, NIHAO XX: the impact of the star formation threshold on the cusp–core transformation of cold dark matter haloes, MNRAS486(2019) 655 [1811.10625]

    2019 arXiv

  101. [108]

    M. D. A. Orkney, J. I. Read, M. P. Rey, I. Nasim, A. Pontzen, O. Agertz et al., EDGE: two routes to dark matter core formation in ultra-faint dwarfs,MNRAS504(2021) 3509 [2101.02688]

    2021 arXiv

  102. [109]

    C. Muni, A. Pontzen, J. I. Read, O. Agertz, M. P. Rey, E. Taylor et al., EDGE: dark matter core creation depends on the timing of star formation,MNRAS536 (2025) 314 [2407.14579]

    2025 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Dehnen,A Hierarchical <E10>O</E10>(N) Force Calculation Algorithm,Journal of Computational Physics179(2002) 27 [astro-ph/0202512]

    W. Dehnen,A Hierarchical <E10>O</E10>(N) Force Calculation Algorithm,Journal of Computational Physics179(2002) 27 [astro-ph/0202512]. – 28 – 0 10 20 rclump 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40d6D −40 −20 0 20 40 kpc −40 −20 0 20 40 kpc MStrongly bounded = 9.74e + 08M⊙ Mloosely bounded = 4...

    2002 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.