pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.18532 · v4 · submitted 2025-09-23 · ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph

A Doppler backscattering diagnostic for the EXL-50U spherical tokamak: plasma considerations and preliminary quasioptical design

Ying Hao Matthew Liang , Valerian Hongjie Hall-Chen , Terry L. Rhodes , Yumin Wang , Yihang Zhao This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 15:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph
keywords Doppler backscatteringspherical tokamakplasma turbulencebeam tracingfusion diagnosticsquasioptical designEXL-50U
0
0 comments X

The pith

A Doppler backscattering diagnostic for EXL-50U can access scattering locations from 0.15 to 1 in normalized radius with wavenumbers 2.47 to 9.49 cm^{-1}.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a conceptual design for a Doppler backscattering diagnostic on the EXL-50U spherical tokamak to measure plasma turbulence. Beam-tracing calculations with SCOTTY for multiple plasma scenarios show that the system can reach scattering locations across 0.15 < ρ < 1, covering turbulent wavenumbers from 2.47 cm^{-1} to 9.49 cm^{-1}. To handle the tokamak's high magnetic pitch angle of roughly 35 degrees at the outboard midplane, the design uses toroidal launch angle steering and tunable frequency channels in the U-band to keep the probe wavevector perpendicular to the magnetic field at cutoff. A preliminary quasioptical layout is proposed that fits available ports and in-vessel space. These measurements would provide data on turbulence that drives transport in this device aimed at proton-boron fusion.

Core claim

Using SCOTTY beam-tracing for several EXL-50U plasma scenarios, the design calculations demonstrate that a DBS system can measure scattering at normalized radii 0.15 < ρ < 1 with corresponding perpendicular wavenumbers 2.47 cm^{-1} < k_⊥ < 9.49 cm^{-1}, provided toroidal launch angles are chosen to align the probe beam perpendicular to the local magnetic field.

What carries the argument

SCOTTY beam-tracing code that predicts cutoff locations and scattering wavenumbers for given density, magnetic field profiles, and launch conditions, combined with toroidal steering and tunable frequencies in a 40-60 GHz quasioptical system.

If this is right

  • The diagnostic can obtain turbulence data from near the core edge to the plasma boundary in multiple operating scenarios.
  • Toroidal steering and frequency tuning will be required to maximize signal strength given the high pitch angle.
  • The U-band quasioptical hardware must be compatible with available port windows and in-vessel constraints.
  • Measured turbulence spectra can inform transport studies relevant to the device's proton-boron fusion goals.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the predicted coverage is realized, the diagnostic could help identify which turbulence scales dominate energy losses in compact spherical tokamaks.
  • The same beam-tracing approach might be adapted to check DBS feasibility on other high-pitch-angle devices before hardware installation.
  • Comparing measured cutoff positions against the SCOTTY predictions would provide a direct test of the plasma equilibrium assumptions used in the design.

Load-bearing premise

The plasma density and magnetic field profiles assumed in the SCOTTY calculations match the actual operating conditions that will be achieved in EXL-50U.

What would settle it

If actual plasma profiles in EXL-50U produce cutoff locations or scattering wavenumbers outside the predicted intervals, or if the backscattered power drops sharply when the toroidal angle is set according to the design, the coverage claims would not hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.18532 by Terry L. Rhodes, Valerian Hongjie Hall-Chen, Yihang Zhao, Ying Hao Matthew Liang, Yumin Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: An antenna emits a microwave probe beam into the plasma and receives the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a)–(c): Electron density as a function of the normalised radial coordinate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Magnetic field profile in the EXL-50U. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Cutoff frequencies along the midplane in the EXL-50U for (a): H-mode (A), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Poloidal section of the EXL-50U containing the plasma (depicted in pink). The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a)–(c): Ratio of the wavenumber at cutoff to the vacuum wavenumber [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a)–(c): Cut-off positions and their corresponding normalised turbulence wavenum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Map of the localization and normalized turbulence wavenumbers [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Map of the localization and normalized turbulence wavenumbers [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (a)–(c): Heatmaps of the mismatch angle θm of X-mode beams across varying frequencies and toroidal launch angles φt: (a): H-mode (A), (b): H-mode (B), and (c): L-mode. (d)–(f): Corresponding mismatch attenuation, defined as exp −2θm 2 /∆θm 2  [28]: (d): H-mode (A), (e): H-mode (B), and (f): L-mode. The grey line represents zero mismatch. Toroidal steering is needed because it is generally impossible to a… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: (a)–(c): Heatmaps of the mismatch angle θm of O-mode beams across varying frequencies and toroidal launch angles φt: (a): H-mode (A), (b): H-mode (B), and (c): L-mode. (d)–(f): Corresponding mismatch attenuation, defined as exp −2θm 2 /∆θm 2  [28]: (d): H-mode (A), (e): H-mode (B), and (f): L-mode. The grey line represents zero mismatch. Toroidal steering is needed because it is generally impossible to a… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Overview of the DBS used to send microwaves into the plasma. The antenna [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Evolution of the beam width for the 40–60 GHz system as the beam propagates [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Plot showing the possible launch widths and curvatures produced by each system. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: (a) Diagram showing the quantities used to calculate the beam widths at the port [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: A possible two-mirror DBS design that can be implemented for the EXL-50U. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_16.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The EXL-50U spherical tokamak was built by Energy iNNovation to develop technologies for proton-boron fusion in spherical tokamaks (Liu et al., Phys. Plasmas 2024). We present a conceptual design of the Doppler backscattering (DBS) diagnostic for the EXL-50U spherical tokamak. DBS is a diagnostic capable of measuring plasma turbulence, which is especially important for transport in tokamaks. Starting from a set of physical design constraints, such as port window availability and in-vessel space, we used SCOTTY (Hall-Chen et al., PPCF 2022), an in-house beam tracing code, to predict the location of the cutoffs and the corresponding scattering wavenumbers for several EXL-50U plasma scenarios. We find that we are able to measure scattering locations of 0.15 $<$ $\rho$ $<$ 1, with corresponding turbulent wavenumbers of 2.47 cm$^{-1}$$<$ $k_{\perp}$ $<$ 9.49 cm$^{-1}$. Here, $\rho$ is the normalised radial coordinate of the scattering location, and $k_{\perp}$ is the corresponding turbulent wavenumber. We then determine the optimal toroidal launch angles to ensure that the probe beam's wavevector is perpendicular to the magnetic field at the cutoff location, thereby maximising the backscattered signal. This matching is crucial due to the EXL-50U's high magnetic pitch angle, $\sim35^{\circ}$ at the outboard midplane. Given our results, we propose the use of toroidal steering and tunable frequency channels to ensure beams are well-matched with the magnetic pitch angle. We propose a quasioptical system that covers the U-band range (40--60 GHz).

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript outlines a conceptual design for a Doppler backscattering (DBS) diagnostic for the EXL-50U spherical tokamak. The authors use the SCOTTY beam-tracing code to predict cutoff locations and scattering wavenumbers for multiple plasma scenarios, reporting accessible normalized radii in the range 0.15 < ρ < 1 and turbulent wavenumbers 2.47 cm^{-1} < k_⊥ < 9.49 cm^{-1}. They propose a quasioptical system in the U-band (40-60 GHz) incorporating toroidal steering and tunable frequency channels to ensure the probe beam is perpendicular to the magnetic field at the cutoff, accounting for the high magnetic pitch angle of approximately 35 degrees at the outboard midplane.

Significance. This design study is significant as it provides specific predictions for turbulence measurements in a new spherical tokamak focused on proton-boron fusion. The use of SCOTTY for beam tracing offers quantitative insights into accessible measurement locations and wavenumbers. The emphasis on matching the beam to the magnetic pitch angle addresses a key challenge in spherical tokamaks. However, the reliance on projected plasma profiles means the results are preliminary and would benefit from validation once the device operates.

major comments (1)
  1. [Plasma scenarios] The headline result on the accessible ρ and k_⊥ ranges is obtained by launching beams into model density and magnetic field profiles for EXL-50U. The manuscript should include an analysis of how uncertainties or variations in these input profiles (e.g., central density or scale length) propagate to the predicted ranges, as shifts of 15-20% could alter the quoted intervals substantially.
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify the exact plasma parameters (density, temperature, B-field) for each scenario considered in the SCOTTY simulations to allow reproducibility.
  2. [Quasioptical design] Provide more details on the port window availability and in-vessel space constraints that informed the design choices.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review and for recognizing the significance of our conceptual DBS diagnostic design for the EXL-50U spherical tokamak. We address the major comment below and will incorporate the requested analysis into the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The headline result on the accessible ρ and k_⊥ ranges is obtained by launching beams into model density and magnetic field profiles for EXL-50U. The manuscript should include an analysis of how uncertainties or variations in these input profiles (e.g., central density or scale length) propagate to the predicted ranges, as shifts of 15-20% could alter the quoted intervals substantially.

    Authors: We agree that quantifying the sensitivity of the predicted ρ and k_⊥ ranges to uncertainties in the input profiles would improve the robustness of our results. The manuscript already examines several distinct plasma scenarios to sample variations in density and magnetic field. To address the referee's specific request, we will add a dedicated sensitivity study in the revised version. This will include systematic variations of central density by ±20% and corresponding adjustments to the density scale length, followed by recomputation of cutoff locations and scattering wavenumbers using SCOTTY. The outcomes will be summarized in an additional table or figure, with explicit discussion of how the quoted intervals (0.15 < ρ < 1 and 2.47 cm^{-1} < k_⊥ < 9.49 cm^{-1}) may shift under these perturbations. We believe this addition will directly respond to the concern while remaining consistent with the preliminary nature of the projected profiles. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results from external code on stated profiles

full rationale

The paper computes scattering locations (0.15 < ρ < 1) and wavenumbers (2.47 cm^{-1} < k_⊥ < 9.49 cm^{-1}) by launching beams at chosen frequencies and angles into assumed EXL-50U density and B profiles using the SCOTTY beam-tracing code. These outputs are direct numerical results of the code application rather than quantities defined in terms of themselves or fitted parameters renamed as predictions. The citation to Hall-Chen et al. (PPCF 2022) describes the code tool and is not load-bearing for the central claims, which consist of new calculations for this device; the derivation remains self-contained against the explicitly stated input profiles and does not reduce to tautology or self-referential construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The design rests on standard tokamak plasma physics assumptions and the accuracy of the SCOTTY code for this geometry. No new particles or forces are postulated. A small number of plasma profile assumptions are required to run the beam tracing.

free parameters (1)
  • Plasma density and temperature profiles
    Several EXL-50U plasma scenarios are used as inputs to SCOTTY; these profiles are chosen rather than derived from first principles within the paper.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption SCOTTY beam-tracing code accurately predicts cutoff locations and scattering wavenumbers in spherical tokamak geometry
    The entire set of predicted ρ and k_perp values depends on the validity of this external code for the EXL-50U magnetic field and density.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5882 in / 1599 out tokens · 57027 ms · 2026-05-18T15:13:05.179559+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. C. Hillesheim, Studies of turbulence and flows in the diii-d tokamak, Ph.D. thesis (2012). 41

    work page 2012

  2. [2]

    Doyle, W

    E. Doyle, W. Houlberg, Y. Kamada, V. Mukhovatov, T. Osborne, A. Polevoi, G. Bateman, J. Connor, J. Cordey, T. Fujita, et al., Plasma confinement and transport, Nuclear Fusion 47 (6) (2007) S18

    work page 2007

  3. [3]

    Garbet, P

    X. Garbet, P. Mantica, C. Angioni, E. Asp, Y. Baranov, C. Bourdelle, R.Budny, F.Crisanti, G.Cordey, L.Garzotti, etal., Physicsoftransport in tokamaks, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 46 (12B) (2004) B557

    work page 2004

  4. [4]

    Garbet, Y

    X. Garbet, Y. Idomura, L. Villard, T. Watanabe, Gyrokinetic simula- tions of turbulent transport, Nuclear Fusion 50 (4) (2010) 043002

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    URLhttps://www.iaea.org/publications/8879/fusion-physics

    Fusion Physics, Non-serial Publications, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 2012. URLhttps://www.iaea.org/publications/8879/fusion-physics

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    M. Wade, J. Leuer, Cost drivers for a tokamak-based compact pilot plant, Fusion Science and Technology 77 (2) (2021) 119–143

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Liu, H.-s

    M.-s. Liu, H.-s. Xie, Y.-m. Wang, J.-q. Dong, K.-m. Feng, X. Gu, X.-l. Huang, X.-c. Jiang, Y.-y. Li, Z. Li, et al., Enn’s roadmap for proton- boron fusion based on spherical torus, Physics of plasmas 31 (6) (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Yuejiang, S

    S. Yuejiang, S. Xianming, G. Dong, G. Xiang, D. Lili, W. Xueyun, S. Tiantian, T. Muzhi, C. Zhengyuan, Y. Guang, et al., Strategy and experimental progress of the exl-50u spherical torus in support of the ehl-2 project, Plasma Science and Technology 27 (2) (2025) 024003

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    S. M. Kaye, J. W. Connor, C. M. Roach, Thermal confinement and 42 transport in spherical tokamaks: a review, Plasma Physics and Con- trolled Fusion 63 (12) (2021) 123001

    work page 2021

  10. [10]

    Bingren, Toroidicity dependence of tokamak edge safety factor and shear, Plasma Science and Technology 5 (4) (2003) 1849

    S. Bingren, Toroidicity dependence of tokamak edge safety factor and shear, Plasma Science and Technology 5 (4) (2003) 1849

    work page 2003

  11. [11]

    Howard, C

    N. Howard, C. Holland, A. White, M. Greenwald, J. Candy, A. Creely, Multi-scale gyrokinetic simulations: Comparison with experiment and implications for predicting turbulence and transport, Physics of Plasmas 23 (5) (2016)

    work page 2016

  12. [12]

    Maeyama, Y

    S. Maeyama, Y. Idomura, T.-H. Watanabe, M. Nakata, M. Yagi, N. Miy- ato, A. Ishizawa, M. Nunami, Cross-scale interactions between electron and ion scale turbulence in a tokamak plasma, Physical review letters 114 (25) (2015) 255002

    work page 2015

  13. [13]

    Maeyama, T.-H

    S. Maeyama, T.-H. Watanabe, Y. Idomura, M. Nakata, A. Ishizawa, M. Nunami, Cross-scale interactions between turbulence driven by elec- tron and ion temperature gradients via sub-ion-scale structures, Nuclear Fusion 57 (6) (2017) 066036

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    Hennequin, C

    P. Hennequin, C. Honoré, A. Truc, A. Quéméneur, N. Lemoine, J.-M. Chareau, R. Sabot, Doppler backscattering system for measuring fluctuations and their perpendicular veloc- ity on tore supra, Review of Scientific Instruments 75 (10) (2004) 3881–3883. arXiv:https://pubs.aip.org/aip/rsi/article- pdf/75/10/3881/19310531/3881_1_online.pdf, doi:10.1063/1.17879...

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1787920 2004

  15. [15]

    Happel, T

    T. Happel, T. Estrada, E. Blanco, V. Tribaldos, A. Cappa, A. Bustos, Doppler reflectometer system in the stellarator tj-ii, Review of Scientific Instruments 80 (7) (2009)

    work page 2009

  16. [16]

    C. Zhou, A. Liu, X. Zhang, J. Hu, M. Wang, H. Li, T. Lan, J. Xie, X. Sun, W. Ding, et al., Microwave doppler reflectometer system in the experimental advanced superconducting tokamak, Review of Scientific Instruments 84 (10) (2013)

    work page 2013

  17. [17]

    Z. Shi, W. Zhong, M. Jiang, Z. Yang, B. Zhang, P. Shi, W. Chen, J. Wen, C. Chen, B. Fu, Z. Liu, X. Ding, Q. Yang, X. Duan, A novel multi-channel quadrature doppler backward scattering reflectometer on the hl-2a tokamak, Review of Scientific Instruments 87 (11) (Nov. 2016). doi:10.1063/1.4966680. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4966680

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4966680 2016

  18. [18]

    Rhodes, K

    T. Rhodes, K. Barada, W. Peebles, N. Crocker, Simultaneous measure- ment of magnetic and density fluctuations via cross-polarization scat- tering and doppler backscattering on the diii-d tokamak, Review of Sci- entific Instruments 87 (11) (2016)

    work page 2016

  19. [19]

    J. Hu, C. Zhou, A. Liu, M. Wang, E. Doyle, W. Peebles, G. Wang, X. Zhang, J. Zhang, X. Feng, et al., An eight-channel doppler backscat- tering system in the experimental advanced superconducting tokamak, Review of Scientific Instruments 88 (7) (2017)

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    T.Tokuzawa, H.Tsuchiya, T.Tsujimura, M.Emoto, H.Nakanishi, S.In- agaki, K. Ida, H. Yamada, A. Ejiri, K. Watanabe, et al., Microwave fre- 44 quency comb doppler reflectometer applying fast digital data acquisition system in lhd, Review of Scientific Instruments 89 (10) (2018)

    work page 2018

  21. [21]

    Molina Cabrera, S

    P. Molina Cabrera, S. Coda, L. Porte, A. Smolders, T. Team, et al., V-band nanosecond-scale pulse reflectometer diagnostic in the tcv toka- mak, Review of Scientific Instruments 90 (12) (2019)

    work page 2019

  22. [22]

    J. Wen, Z. Shi, W. Zhong, Z. Yang, Z. Yang, B. Wang, M. Jiang, P. Shi, J. Hillesheim, S. Freethy, et al., A remote gain controlled and polariza- tion angle tunable doppler backward scattering reflectometer, Review of Scientific Instruments 92 (6) (2021)

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    Tokuzawa, K

    T. Tokuzawa, K. Tanaka, T. Tsujimura, S. Kubo, M. Emoto, S. Ina- gaki, K. Ida, M. Yoshinuma, K. Watanabe, H. Tsuchiya, et al., W-band millimeter-wave back-scattering system for high wavenumber turbulence measurements in lhd, Review of Scientific Instruments 92 (4) (2021)

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    Carralero, T

    D. Carralero, T. Happel, T. Estrada, T. Tokuzawa, J. Martínez, E. De La Luna, A. Cappa, J. García, A feasibility study for a doppler reflectometer system in the jt-60sa tokamak, Fusion Engineering and Design 173 (2021) 112803

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    Yashin, V

    A. Yashin, V. Bulanin, A. Petrov, A. Ponomarenko, Review of advanced implementation of doppler backscattering method in globus-m, Applied Sciences 11 (19) (2021) 8975

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    Pratt, T

    Q. Pratt, T. Rhodes, C. Chrystal, T. Carter, Comparison of doppler back-scattering and charge exchange measurements of e×b plasma ro- 45 tation in the diii-d tokamak under varying torque conditions, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 64 (9) (2022)

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Pratt, V

    Q. Pratt, V. Hall-Chen, T. F. Neiser, R. Hong, J. Damba, T. L. Rhodes, K.E.Thome, J.Yang, S.R.Haskey, T.Cote, etal., Densitywavenumber spectrum measurements, synthetic diagnostic development, and tests of quasilinear turbulence modeling in the core of electron-heated diii-d h- mode plasmas, Nuclear Fusion 64 (1) (2023) 016001

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    V. H. Hall-Chen, F. I. Parra, J. C. Hillesheim, Beam model of doppler backscattering, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 64 (9) (2022) 095002

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    V. H. Hall-Chen, F. I. Parra, J. C. Hillesheim, J. R. Ruiz, N. A. Crocker, P. Shi, H. S. Chu, S. J. Freethy, L. A. Kogan, W. A. Peebles, et al., Effect of mismatch on doppler backscattering in mast and mast-u plasmas, arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.17141 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    Damba, Q

    J. Damba, Q. Pratt, V. Hall-Chen, R. Hong, R. Lantsov, R. Ellis, T. Rhodes, Evaluation of a new diii-d doppler backscattering system for higher wavenumber measurement and signal enhancement, Review of Scientific Instruments 93 (10) (2022)

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    V. H. Hall-Chen, J. Damba, F. I. Parra, Q. T. Pratt, C. A. Michael, S. Peng, T. L. Rhodes, N. A. Crocker, J. C. Hillesheim, R. Hong, et al., Validating and optimizing mismatch tolerance of doppler backscattering measurements with the beam model, Review of Scientific Instruments 93 (10) (2022). 46

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    Hall-Chen, Beam model of doppler backscattering: theory and ex- periment, Ph.D

    V. Hall-Chen, Beam model of doppler backscattering: theory and ex- periment, Ph.D. thesis, University of Oxford (2021)

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    Dodin, N

    I. Dodin, N. Lopez, T. Xing, R. H. Marholt, V. H. Hall-Chen, Geomet- rical optics in phase space, arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.08098 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Lopez, Exact boundary-value solution for an electromagnetic wave propagating in a linearly varying index of refraction, Journal of Plasma Physics 90 (6) (2024) 995900602

    N. Lopez, Exact boundary-value solution for an electromagnetic wave propagating in a linearly varying index of refraction, Journal of Plasma Physics 90 (6) (2024) 995900602

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Honoré, P

    C. Honoré, P. Hennequin, A. Truc, A. Quéméneur, Quasi-optical gaus- sianbeamtracingtoevaluatedopplerbackscatteringconditions, Nuclear fusion 46 (9) (2006) S809

    work page 2006

  36. [36]

    Hirsch, E

    M. Hirsch, E. Holzhauer, J. Baldzuhn, B. Kurzan, B. Scott, Doppler reflectometry for the investigation of propagating density perturbations, Plasma physics and controlled fusion 43 (12) (2001) 1641

    work page 2001

  37. [37]

    Gusakov, A

    E. Gusakov, A. Surkov, Spatial and wavenumber resolution of doppler reflectometry, Plasma physics and controlled fusion 46 (7) (2004) 1143

    work page 2004

  38. [38]

    L. W. Casperson, Gaussian light beams in inhomogeneous media, Ap- plied optics 12 (10) (1973) 2434–2441

    work page 1973

  39. [39]

    Červen` y, M

    V. Červen` y, M. M. Popov, I. Pšenčík, Computation of wave fields in inhomogeneous media—gaussian beam approach, Geophysical Journal International 70 (1) (1982) 109–128

    work page 1982

  40. [40]

    Y. A. Kravtsov, P. Berczynski, Gaussian beams in inhomogeneous me- dia: a review, Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 51 (1) (2007) 1–36. 47

    work page 2007

  41. [41]

    Pereverzev, Use of the multidimensional wkb method to describe propagation of lower hybrid waves in tokamak plasma, Nuclear fusion 32 (7) (1992) 1091

    G. Pereverzev, Use of the multidimensional wkb method to describe propagation of lower hybrid waves in tokamak plasma, Nuclear fusion 32 (7) (1992) 1091

    work page 1992

  42. [42]

    G.V.Pereverzev, Paraxialwkbsolutionofascalarwaveequation(1993)

    work page 1993

  43. [43]

    Pereverzev, Paraxial wkb solution of a scalar wave equation, in: B

    G. Pereverzev, Paraxial wkb solution of a scalar wave equation, in: B. B. Kadomtsev (Ed.), Reviews of Plasma Physics, Vol. 19, Springer New York, NY, 1996, pp. 1–48

    work page 1996

  44. [44]

    Pereverzev, Beam tracing in inhomogeneous anisotropic plasmas, Physics of Plasmas 5 (10) (1998) 3529–3541

    G. Pereverzev, Beam tracing in inhomogeneous anisotropic plasmas, Physics of Plasmas 5 (10) (1998) 3529–3541

    work page 1998

  45. [45]

    Prater, D

    R. Prater, D. Farina, Y. Gribov, R. Harvey, A. Ram, Y.-R. Lin-Liu, E. Poli, A. Smirnov, F. Volpe, E. Westerhof, et al., Benchmarking of codes for electron cyclotron heating and electron cyclotron current drive under iter conditions, Nuclear Fusion 48 (3) (2008) 035006

    work page 2008

  46. [46]

    O. Maj, G. V. Pereverzev, E. Poli, Validation of the paraxial beam- tracing method in critical cases, Physics of Plasmas 16 (6) (2009)

    work page 2009

  47. [47]

    J. R. Ruiz, F. I. Parra, V. H. Hall-Chen, N. Belrhali, C. Giroud, J. C. Hillesheim, N. A. Lopez, et al., Beam focusing and consequences for doppler backscattering measurements, Journal of Plasma Physics 91 (2) (2025) E60

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    V. H. Hall-Chen, Scotty,https://github.com/beam-tracing/Scotty (2022). 48

    work page 2022

  49. [49]

    J. Chen, X. Jian, V. S. Chan, Z. Li, Z. Deng, G. Li, W. Guo, N. Shi, X. Chen, et al., Self-consistent modeling of cfetr baseline scenarios for steady-state operation, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 59 (7) (2017) 075005

    work page 2017

  50. [50]

    L. L. Lao, H. S. John, R. Stambaugh, A. Kellman, W. Pfeiffer, Recon- struction of current profile parameters and plasma shapes in tokamaks, Nuclear fusion 25 (11) (1985) 1611

    work page 1985

  51. [51]

    Candy, C

    J. Candy, C. Holland, R. Waltz, M. R. Fahey, E. Belli, Tokamak profile prediction using direct gyrokinetic and neoclassical simulation, Physics of Plasmas 16 (6) (2009)

    work page 2009

  52. [52]

    Pankin, D

    A. Pankin, D. McCune, R. Andre, G. Bateman, A. Kritz, The tokamak monte carlo fast ion module nubeam in the national transport code collaboration library, Computer Physics Communications 159 (3) (2004) 157–184

    work page 2004

  53. [53]

    Kritz, H

    A. Kritz, H. Hsuan, R. Goldfinger, D. Batchelor, Ray tracing study of electron cyclotron heating in toroidal geometry, in: Heating in Toroidal Plasmas 1982, Elsevier, 1982, pp. 707–723

    work page 1982

  54. [54]

    Smirnov, R

    A. Smirnov, R. Harvey, K. Kupfer, A general ray tracing code genray, Bull Amer. Phys. Soc 39 (7) (1994) 1626

    work page 1994

  55. [55]

    Hillesheim, N

    J. Hillesheim, N. Crocker, W. Peebles, H. Meyer, A. Meakins, A. Field, D. Dunai, M. Carr, N. Hawkes, M. Team, et al., Doppler backscattering for spherical tokamaks and measurement of high-k density fluctuation wavenumber spectrum in mast, Nuclear Fusion 55 (7) (2015) 073024. 49

    work page 2015

  56. [56]

    Bindslev, Relativistic effects in plasma reflectometry, Plasma physics and controlled fusion 34 (11) (1992) 1601

    H. Bindslev, Relativistic effects in plasma reflectometry, Plasma physics and controlled fusion 34 (11) (1992) 1601

    work page 1992

  57. [57]

    G. Wang, T. Rhodes, W. Peebles, R. Harvey, R. Budny, Refractive and relativistic effects on iter low field side reflectometer design, Review of Scientific Instruments 81 (10) (2010)

    work page 2010

  58. [58]

    Rhodes, R

    T. Rhodes, R. Lantsov, G. Wang, R. Ellis, W. Peebles, Optimized quasi- optical cross-polarization scattering system for the measurement of mag- netic turbulence on the diii-d tokamak, Review of Scientific Instruments 89 (10) (2018)

    work page 2018

  59. [59]

    Guttenfelder, J

    W. Guttenfelder, J. Candy, Resolving electron scale turbulence in spher- ical tokamaks with flow shear, Physics of Plasmas 18 (2) (2011)

    work page 2011

  60. [60]

    Mazzucato, D

    E. Mazzucato, D. Smith, R. Bell, S. Kaye, J. Hosea, B. LeBlanc, J. Wil- son, P. Ryan, C. Domier, N. Luhmann Jr, et al., Short-scale turbu- lent fluctuations driven by the electron-temperature gradient in the na- tionalsphericaltorusexperiment, PhysicalReviewLetters101(7)(2008) 075001

    work page 2008

  61. [61]

    Maeyama, N

    S. Maeyama, N. Howard, J. Citrin, T.-H. Watanabe, T. Tokuzawa, Overview of multiscale turbulence studies covering ion-to-electron scales in magnetically confined fusion plasma, Nuclear Fusion 64 (11) (2024) 112007

    work page 2024

  62. [62]

    Maeyama, T.-H

    S. Maeyama, T.-H. Watanabe, A. Ishizawa, Suppression of ion-scale microtearing modes by electron-scale turbulence via cross-scale nonlin- 50 ear interactions in tokamak plasmas, Physical Review Letters 119 (19) (2017) 195002

    work page 2017

  63. [63]

    Bulanin, M

    V. Bulanin, M. Yafanov, Spatial and spectral resolution of the plasma doppler reflectometry, Plasma Physics Reports 32 (1) (2006) 47–55. 51

    work page 2006