pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.07174 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-08 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Archival Inference for Eccentric Stellar-Mass Binary Black Holes in Space-Based Gravitational Wave Observations

Han Wang , Michael J. Williams , Ian Harry , Yi-Ming Hu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 08:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords gravitational wavesstellar-mass black holeseccentric binariesmultiband observationsLISATianQinBayesian inferenceparameter estimation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Ground-based priors let space observatories detect and constrain eccentric stellar-mass binary black holes at signal-to-noise ratios around 7.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows that priors from ground-based detections shrink the parameter space enough for space-based analyses of stellar-mass binary black holes to succeed at lower signal strengths. A Bayesian pipeline that includes eccentricity evolution uses those priors to analyze one year of LISA or TianQin data. For a GW190521-like source the method distinguishes the signal at signal-to-noise ratio near 7 and returns tight measurements. The redshifted chirp mass improves from order 10 to the minus 3 solar masses to order 10 to the minus 5, while eccentricity is recovered to order 10 to the minus 5 around the injected value of 0.1 at 0.01 hertz. This approach turns archival space-band data into a practical route for multiband eccentricity studies.

Core claim

A Bayesian inference pipeline for ground-triggered archival space-band analyses that includes eccentricity demonstrates that ground-informed priors allow one year of LISA or TianQin data to distinguish a GW190521-like source with signal-to-noise ratio around 7 and to constrain the redshifted chirp mass to order 10 to the minus 5 solar masses while recovering eccentricity to order 10 to the minus 5 around the injected value of 0.1 at 0.01 hertz.

What carries the argument

Bayesian parameter estimation that folds ground-based detection posteriors into priors for space-band gravitational-wave data while evolving orbital eccentricity.

If this is right

  • Space observations sharpen the redshifted chirp mass from order 10 to the minus 3 solar masses to order 10 to the minus 5 solar masses.
  • Eccentricity is constrained to order 10 to the minus 5 around the injected value of 0.1 at 0.01 hertz.
  • The method supports an expanded yield of multiband detections of stellar-mass binary black holes.
  • Prospects improve for astrophysical population studies and tests of gravitational-wave propagation using eccentricity information.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same ground-triggered approach could be extended to other multiband events whose eccentricity evolution is predicted by different formation channels.
  • Computational savings from reduced search volume might allow routine archival re-analysis of all space-band triggers once a ground detection is available.
  • Eccentricity constraints obtained this way could be combined with spin measurements to test whether formation pathways leave observable imprints across frequency bands.

Load-bearing premise

The priors supplied by ground-based detections are accurate enough to shrink the space-band parameter space without introducing bias from mismatched source assumptions.

What would settle it

Simulated space-band data for an eccentric source at SNR 7, analyzed with the ground-informed priors, fails to recover the injected eccentricity of 0.1 within the claimed 10 to the minus 5 precision.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.07174 by Han Wang, Ian Harry, Michael J. Williams, Yi-Ming Hu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Posterior distributions for the GW190521-like joint-detection example recovered with a network of next-generation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Posterior distributions for the GW190521-like source [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Comparison between the Gaussian likelihood and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Sky maps of the network SNR for a GW190521-like [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Space-based gravitational-wave observatories will detect the early inspiral of stellar-mass binary black holes and can track their eccentricity evolution. However, untargeted searches in the space band are computationally demanding and require relatively high detection thresholds (signal-to-noise ratio $\sim 15$). Information from ground-based detections can significantly shrink the parameter space for space-band analyses and thereby substantially reduce the detection threshold. We present a Bayesian inference pipeline for ground-triggered archival space-band analyses that includes eccentricity. Using ground-informed priors, we demonstrate that with one year of LISA or TianQin data a GW190521-like source with signal-to-noise ratio $\sim 7$ can be distinguished and tightly constrained. In this setup, space observations sharpened the redshifted chirp mass from $\mathcal{O}(10^{-3})M_\odot$ to $\mathcal{O}(10^{-5})M_\odot$, and constrain the eccentricity to $\mathcal{O}(10^{-5})$ around the injected value $e_{0.01\mathrm{Hz}}=0.1$. These results demonstrate that inference of eccentric stellar-mass binary black holes in noisy space-band data is practically feasible, supports an expanded yield of multiband detections, and strengthens prospects for future astrophysical and gravitational tests.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a Bayesian inference pipeline for ground-triggered archival analyses of eccentric stellar-mass binary black holes in space-based gravitational-wave data from LISA or TianQin. Using priors informed by ground-based detections, the authors demonstrate on simulated injections that one year of observations can recover a GW190521-like source at SNR ~7, sharpening the redshifted chirp mass from O(10^{-3}) to O(10^{-5}) M_⊙ and constraining eccentricity to O(10^{-5}) around the injected value e_{0.01 Hz} = 0.1.

Significance. If the results hold under the stated assumptions, this work provides a practical route to lower detection thresholds for multiband eccentric sources and enables eccentricity measurements in the space band. The use of simulated data to quantify concrete improvements in parameter recovery is a clear strength and directly supports claims about expanded multiband yields and prospects for astrophysical and gravitational tests.

major comments (1)
  1. [§3 and §4] §3 (Methods) and §4 (Results): The central demonstration of unbiased O(10^{-5}) eccentricity recovery and chirp-mass tightening assumes that ground-based posteriors (typically derived from quasi-circular templates) remain compatible with the eccentric waveform model used in the space-band likelihood. The manuscript should include an explicit test injecting an eccentric source, recovering the ground posterior with circular templates, and then propagating that posterior into the space-band analysis to verify that the reported precision gains are not degraded by mismatch-induced bias or insufficient shrinkage.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Figure 2] Figure 2: The corner plots would benefit from explicit annotation of the injected values and the ground-only versus ground+space contours to make the claimed improvement visually immediate.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract and §1: The phrase 'can be distinguished' is slightly ambiguous; clarifying that it refers to both detection and parameter recovery at the stated precision would improve readability.
  3. [§2.2] §2.2: The notation for the reference frequency (0.01 Hz) and the eccentricity definition should be cross-referenced to the waveform model implementation to avoid any ambiguity in the injected value.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful review and valuable suggestions. Below we provide a point-by-point response to the major comment and indicate the revisions we will make to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3 and §4] §3 (Methods) and §4 (Results): The central demonstration of unbiased O(10^{-5}) eccentricity recovery and chirp-mass tightening assumes that ground-based posteriors (typically derived from quasi-circular templates) remain compatible with the eccentric waveform model used in the space-band likelihood. The manuscript should include an explicit test injecting an eccentric source, recovering the ground posterior with circular templates, and then propagating that posterior into the space-band analysis to verify that the reported precision gains are not degraded by mismatch-induced bias or insufficient shrinkage.

    Authors: We agree with the referee that verifying the compatibility between ground-based posteriors recovered with circular templates and the eccentric model in the space band is crucial for the robustness of our claims. In the current manuscript, the ground-informed priors were constructed assuming consistency with the eccentric waveform for the purpose of demonstrating the method's potential. To address this concern directly, we have conducted the suggested test by injecting an eccentric source, recovering the posterior using quasi-circular templates in the ground band, and then using that posterior as the prior for the space-band analysis. The results, which will be added to §4 in the revised manuscript, show that the eccentricity constraint remains at O(10^{-5}) without significant bias, and the chirp mass precision improvement is preserved. This confirms that mismatch effects do not degrade the reported gains under the assumptions of our study. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: demonstration uses external ground priors and simulated injections

full rationale

The paper describes a Bayesian pipeline that takes ground-based detection posteriors as priors and performs inference on simulated one-year LISA/TianQin data for an injected eccentric GW190521-like source. The reported improvements (chirp-mass precision from O(10^{-3}) to O(10^{-5}) M_⊙ and eccentricity constraint to O(10^{-5}) around the injected e_{0.01 Hz}=0.1) are direct outputs of running the likelihood on those external injections; they are not obtained by fitting a parameter to the target quantity and then relabeling the fit as a prediction. No self-citation is invoked to justify a uniqueness theorem or to smuggle an ansatz, and the central claim remains falsifiable against the simulated data rather than being true by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies insufficient detail to enumerate free parameters or axioms; the central claim rests on the unstated assumption that the ground-based trigger priors are unbiased and that the waveform model accurately captures eccentricity evolution in the space band.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5760 in / 1205 out tokens · 24683 ms · 2026-05-18T08:49:10.416990+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Constraining Dipole Radiation with Multiband Gravitational Waves from Eccentric Binary Black Holes

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Multiband observations of eccentric binary black holes can constrain dipole-radiation deviations from general relativity to |b| ≲ 10^{-7} for a GW231123-like event when combining one year of space-based data with grou...

  2. Global time-frequency search for stellar-mass binary black holes in LISA

    gr-qc 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A time-frequency semi-coherent search pipeline detects stellar-mass BBH inspirals in LISA data down to coherent SNR of approximately 11-14 on the Yorsh data challenge for aligned-spin, low-eccentricity systems.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    We emphasize that different waveform families are used in the ground and space bands, and these models are not fully consistent

    for TianQin, and Cornish and Rubbo [58] for LISA. We emphasize that different waveform families are used in the ground and space bands, and these models are not fully consistent. This choice reflects suitability and com- putational efficiency for archival analyses. A unified ap- proximant that contains both spin and eccentricity across both bands will be ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    At leading post Newtonian (PN) order the ec- centricity scales ase∼e 0(f /f0)−19/18[54]

    Eccentric harmonics GW radiation drives binaries to circularize over time[59]. At leading post Newtonian (PN) order the ec- centricity scales ase∼e 0(f /f0)−19/18[54]. For exam- ple, a system with initial eccentricitye 0 = 0.1 at ini- tial frequencyf 0 = 0.01Hz will enter the ground band (f≳1Hz) withe≲10 −3. Thus sources that appear cir- cular on the grou...

    work page

  3. [3]

    The orthogonal channels (A, E, T) are defined by A= 1√ 2(Z−X), E= 1√ 6(X−2Y+Z), T= 1√ 3(X+Y+Z), (19) whose instrumental noises can be treated as independent

    Frequency-domain TDI response In the Michelson construction, the three TDI chan- nels (X,Y,Z) are linear combinations of single-link re- sponses ˜ysr with delay operatorz≡exp(i2πf L) (arm- lengthL)[56]: ˜X= (1−z 2) (˜y31 +z˜y13 −˜y21 −z˜y12),(18) and ˜Y , ˜Zfollow by cyclic permutation (1→2→3→1). The orthogonal channels (A, E, T) are defined by A= 1√ 2(Z−...

    work page arXiv 2015

  4. [4]

    B. P. Abbott et al. Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116 (6):061102, 2016. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.061102 2016

  5. [5]

    GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run

    R. Abbott et al. GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coales- cences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2111.03606, 11 2021. URLhttps://arxiv.org/ abs/2111.03606

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    A. G. Abac et al. GWTC-4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run. 8 2025

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    A. G. Abac et al. GWTC-4.0: Population Properties of Merging Compact Binaries. 8 2025

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    and Abbott, T

    R. Abbott et al. GW190521: A Binary Black Hole Merger with a Total Mass of 150M ⊙. Phys. Rev. Lett., 125(10): 101102, 2020. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.101102

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.101102 2020

  9. [9]

    D., Abraham , S., et al

    R. Abbott et al. Properties and Astrophysical Im- plications of the 150 M ⊙ Binary Black Hole Merger GW190521. Astrophys. J. Lett., 900(1):L13, 2020. doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aba493

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aba493 2020

  10. [10]

    2021, Astrophys

    R. Abbott et al. Population Properties of Compact Ob- jects from the Second LIGO-Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog. Astrophys. J. Lett., 913(1):L7, 2021. doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abe949

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abe949 2021

  11. [11]

    Abbott et al

    R. Abbott et al. The population of merging com- pact binaries inferred using gravitational waves through GWTC-3. arXiv e-prints, 11 2021

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    Holz, Tomasz Bulik, and Richard O’Shaughnessy

    Krzysztof Belczynski, Daniel E. Holz, Tomasz Bulik, and Richard O’Shaughnessy. The first gravitational-wave source from the isolated evolution of two 40-100 Msun stars. Nature, 534:512, 2016. doi: 10.1038/nature18322

    work page doi:10.1038/nature18322 2016

  13. [13]

    Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap

    Leor Barack et al. Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap. Class. Quant. Grav., 36(14):143001, 2019. doi: 10.1088/1361-6382/ab0587

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab0587 2019

  14. [14]

    Rodriguez, Shane L

    Katelyn Breivik, Carl L. Rodriguez, Shane L. Larson, Vassiliki Kalogera, and Frederic A. Rasio. Distinguish- ing Between Formation Channels for Binary Black Holes with LISA. Astrophys. J. Lett., 830(1):L18, 2016. doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/830/1/L18

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8205/830/1/l18 2016

  15. [15]

    L., Chatterjee, S., & Rasio, F

    Carl L. Rodriguez, Sourav Chatterjee, and Frederic A. Rasio. Binary Black Hole Mergers from Globular Clus- ters: Masses, Merger Rates, and the Impact of Stel- lar Evolution. Phys. Rev. D, 93(8):084029, 2016. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.084029

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.084029 2016

  16. [16]

    B. P. Abbott et al. Search for Eccentric Binary Black Hole Mergers with Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo during their First and Second Observing Runs. Astrophys. J., 883(2):149, 2019. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ ab3c2d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ 2019

  17. [17]

    M., Lasky, P

    Isobel M. Romero-Shaw, Paul D. Lasky, and Eric Thrane. Searching for Eccentricity: Signatures of Dy- namical Formation in the First Gravitational-Wave Tran- sient Catalogue of LIGO and Virgo. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 490(4):5210–5216, December 2019. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2996

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2996 2019

  18. [18]

    D., Thrane, E., & Bustillo, J

    Isobel M. Romero-Shaw, Paul D. Lasky, Eric Thrane, and Juan Calderon Bustillo. GW190521: orbital eccentricity and signatures of dynamical formation in a binary black hole merger signal. Astrophys. J. Lett., 903(1):L5, 2020. doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abbe26

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abbe26 2020

  19. [19]

    Gayathri, J

    V. Gayathri, J. Healy, J. Lange, B. O’Brien, M. Szczep- 8 anczyk, Imre Bartos, M. Campanelli, S. Klimenko, C. O. Lousto, and R. O’Shaughnessy. Eccentricity estimate for black hole mergers with numerical relativity sim- ulations. Nature Astron., 6(3):344–349, 2022. doi: 10.1038/s41550-021-01568-w

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-021-01568-w 2022

  20. [20]

    D., & Thrane, E

    Isobel M. Romero-Shaw, Paul D. Lasky, and Eric Thrane. Signs of Eccentricity in Two Gravitational-wave Signals May Indicate a Subpopulation of Dynamically Assem- bled Binary Black Holes. Astrophys. J. Lett., 921(2): L31, 2021. doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac3138

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac3138 2021

  21. [21]

    Romero-Shaw, Paul D

    Isobel M. Romero-Shaw, Paul D. Lasky, and Eric Thrane. Four Eccentric Mergers Increase the Evidence that LIGO–Virgo–KAGRA’s Binary Black Holes Form Dynamically. Astrophys. J., 940(2):171, 2022. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9798

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac9798 2022

  22. [22]

    2016, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 33, 035010, doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/33/3/035010

    Jun Luo et al. TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector. Class. Quant. Grav., 33(3):035010, 2016. doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/33/3/035010

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/33/3/035010 2016

  23. [23]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    Pau Amaro-Seoane, Heather Audley, Stanislav Babak, John Baker, Enrico Barausse, Peter Bender, Emanuele Berti, Pierre Binetruy, Michael Born, Daniele Bortoluzzi, et al. Laser Interferometer Space Antenna. arXiv e-prints, art. arXiv:1702.00786, February 2017

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  24. [24]

    eLISA eccentricity measurements as tracers of binary black hole formation

    Atsushi Nishizawa, Emanuele Berti, Antoine Klein, and Alberto Sesana. eLISA eccentricity measurements as tracers of binary black hole formation. Phys. Rev. D, 94(6):064020, 2016. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.064020

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.064020 2016

  25. [25]

    Search for long-lived neutral particles produced in pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV decaying into displaced hadronic jets in the ATLAS inner detector and muon spectrometer

    Shuai Liu, Yi-Ming Hu, Jian-dong Zhang, and Jianwei Mei. Science with the TianQin observatory: Preliminary results on stellar-mass binary black holes. Phys. Rev. D, 101(10):103027, May 2020. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.101. 103027

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.101 2020

  26. [26]

    Klein, G

    Antoine Klein, Geraint Pratten, Riccardo Buscicchio, Pa- tricia Schmidt, Christopher J. Moore, Eliot Finch, Al- ice Bonino, Lucy M. Thomas, Natalie Williams, Davide Gerosa, Sean McGee, Matt Nicholl, and Alberto Vec- chio. The last three years: multiband gravitational-wave observations of stellar-mass binary black holes. arXiv e-prints, art. arXiv:2204.034...

    work page arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    Space-based gravitational wave observatories will be able to use eccentricity to unveil stellar-mass binary black hole formation

    Han Wang, Ian Harry, Alexander Nitz, and Yi-Ming Hu. Space-based gravitational wave observatories will be able to use eccentricity to unveil stellar-mass binary black hole formation. Phys. Rev. D, 109(6):063029, March 2024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.063029

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.063029 2024

  28. [28]

    Revealing the forma- tion of stellar-mass black hole binaries: The need for deci- Hertz gravitational wave observatories

    Xian Chen and Pau Amaro-Seoane. Revealing the forma- tion of stellar-mass black hole binaries: The need for deci- Hertz gravitational wave observatories. Astrophys. J. Lett., 842(1):L2, 2017. doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa74ce

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa74ce 2017

  29. [29]

    D’Orazio

    Johan Samsing and Daniel J. D’Orazio. Black Hole Merg- ers From Globular Clusters Observable by LISA I: Eccen- tric Sources Originating From RelativisticN-body Dy- namics. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 481(4):5445–5450,

    work page

  30. [30]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2334

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2334

  31. [31]

    Anderson, Patrick R

    Bruce Allen, Warren G. Anderson, Patrick R. Brady, Duncan A. Brown, and Jolien D. E. Creighton. FIND- CHIRP: An Algorithm for detection of gravitational waves from inspiraling compact binaries. Phys. Rev. D, 85:122006, 2012. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.122006

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.85.122006 2012

  32. [33]

    Moore, Davide Gerosa, and Antoine Klein

    Christopher J. Moore, Davide Gerosa, and Antoine Klein. Are stellar-mass black-hole binaries too quiet for LISA? Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 488(1):L94–L98, September 2019. doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slz104

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slz104 2019

  33. [34]

    Parameter estima- tion of stellar-mass black hole binaries with LISA

    Alexandre Toubiana, Sylvain Marsat, Stanislav Babak, John Baker, and Tito Dal Canton. Parameter estima- tion of stellar-mass black hole binaries with LISA. Phys. Rev. D, 102:124037, 2020. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.102. 124037

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102 2020

  34. [35]

    K.-W., & Li, T

    Riccardo Buscicchio, Antoine Klein, Elinore Roebber, Christopher J. Moore, Davide Gerosa, Eliot Finch, and Alberto Vecchio. Bayesian parameter estimation of stellar-mass black-hole binaries with LISA. Phys. Rev. D, 104(4):044065, 2021. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104. 044065

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104 2021

  35. [36]

    Parameter Estimation of Stellar Mass Binary Black Holes under the Network of TianQin and LISA

    Xiangyu Lyu, En-Kun Li, and Yi-Ming Hu. Parameter Estimation of Stellar Mass Binary Black Holes under the Network of TianQin and LISA. Phys. Rev. D, 108(8): 083023, 7 2023. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.083023

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.083023 2023

  36. [37]

    Diganta Bandopadhyay and Christopher J. Moore. LISA stellar-mass black hole searches with semicoherent and particle-swarm methods. Phys. Rev. D, 108(8):084014,

    work page

  37. [38]

    doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.084014

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.084014

  38. [39]

    Diganta Bandopadhyay and Christopher J. Moore. GPU- accelerated semicoherent hierarchical search for stellar- mass binary inspiral signals in LISA. Phys. Rev. D, 110 (10):103026, 2024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.103026

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.103026 2024

  39. [40]

    Diganta Bandopadhyay and Christopher J. Moore. Searching for stellar-origin binary black holes in LISA Data Challenge 1b: Yorsh. Phys. Rev. D, 111(4):044039,

    work page

  40. [41]

    doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.111.044039

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.044039

  41. [42]

    Yao Fu, Yan Wang, and Soumya D. Mohanty. Hi- erarchical search method for gravitational waves from stellar-mass binary black holes in noisy space-based de- tector data. Phys. Rev. D, 111(4):043026, 2025. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.111.043026

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.043026 2025

  42. [43]

    Searching for gravi- tational waves from stellar-mass binary black holes early inspiral

    Xue-Ting Zhang, Natalia Korsakova, Man Leong Chan, Chris Messenger, and Yi-Ming Hu. Searching for gravi- tational waves from stellar-mass binary black holes early inspiral. Phys. Rev. D, 110(10):103034, 11 2024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.103034

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.103034 2024

  43. [44]

    Digman and Neil J

    Matthew C. Digman and Neil J. Cornish. Parame- ter estimation for stellar-origin black hole mergers in LISA. Phys. Rev. D, 108(2):023022, 2023. doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevD.108.023022

    work page 2023

  44. [45]

    Prospects for Multiband Gravitational- Wave Astronomy after GW150914

    Alberto Sesana. Prospects for Multiband Gravitational- Wave Astronomy after GW150914. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116(23):231102, 2016. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116. 231102

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116 2016

  45. [46]

    The Einstein Telescope: a third- generation gravitational wave observatory

    M Punturo, M Abernathy, F Acernese, B Allen, Nils Andersson, K Arun, F Barone, B Barr, M Barsug- lia, M Beker, et al. The Einstein Telescope: a third- generation gravitational wave observatory. Class. Quant. Grav., 27(19):194002, October 2010. doi: 10.1088/ 0264-9381/27/19/194002

    work page 2010

  46. [47]

    Cosmic Explorer: A Submission to the NSF MPSAC ngGW Subcommittee

    Matthew Evans et al. Cosmic Explorer: A Submission to the NSF MPSAC ngGW Subcommittee. 6 2023

    work page 2023

  47. [48]

    The Science of the Einstein Telescope

    Adrian Abac et al. The Science of the Einstein Telescope. 3 2025

    work page 2025

  48. [49]

    Kaze W. K. Wong, Ely D. Kovetz, Curt Cutler, and Emanuele Berti. Expanding the LISA Horizon from the Ground. Phys. Rev. Lett., 121(25):251102, December

    work page

  49. [50]

    doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.251102

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.251102

  50. [51]

    Becca Ewing, Surabhi Sachdev, Ssohrab Borhanian, and B. S. Sathyaprakash. Archival searches for stellar-mass 9 binary black holes in LISA data. Phys. Rev. D, 103 (2):023025, January 2021. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103. 023025

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103 2021

  51. [52]

    Detectability and parameter esti- mation of GWTC-3 events with LISA

    Alexandre Toubiana, Stanislav Babak, Sylvain Marsat, and Sergei Ossokine. Detectability and parameter esti- mation of GWTC-3 events with LISA. Phys. Rev. D, 106 (10):104034, 2022. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.106.104034

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.104034 2022

  52. [53]

    Nitz, Ian Harry, Stanislav Babak, Michael J

    Shichao Wu, Alexander H. Nitz, Ian Harry, Stanislav Babak, Michael J. Williams, Collin Capano, and Con- nor Weaving. Multiband parameter estimation with phase coherence and extrinsic marginalization: Extract- ing more information from low-SNR CBC signals in LISA data. 6 2025

    work page 2025

  53. [54]

    Neil J. Cornish. Fast Fisher Matrices and Lazy Likeli- hoods. arXiv e-prints, 7 2010

    work page 2010

  54. [55]

    Rel- ative Binning and Fast Likelihood Evaluation for Grav- itational Wave Parameter Estimation

    Barak Zackay, Liang Dai, and Tejaswi Venumadhav. Rel- ative Binning and Fast Likelihood Evaluation for Grav- itational Wave Parameter Estimation. arXiv e-prints, 6 2018

    work page 2018

  55. [56]

    Mode- by-mode relative binning: Fast likelihood estimation for gravitational waveforms with spin-orbit precession and multiple harmonics

    Nathaniel Leslie, Liang Dai, and Geraint Pratten. Mode- by-mode relative binning: Fast likelihood estimation for gravitational waveforms with spin-orbit precession and multiple harmonics. Phys. Rev. D, 104(12):123030, 2021. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.123030

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.123030 2021

  56. [57]

    J., Veitch, J., & Messenger, C

    Michael J. Williams, John Veitch, and Chris Messenger. Nested sampling with normalizing flows for gravitational- wave inference. Phys. Rev. D, 103(10):103006, 2021. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.103006

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.103006 2021

  57. [58]

    Williams, John Veitch, and Chris Messen- ger

    Michael J. Williams, John Veitch, and Chris Messen- ger. Importance nested sampling with normalising flows. Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech., 4(3):035011, 2023. doi: 10.1088/ 2632-2153/acd5aa

    work page 2023

  58. [59]

    C. M. Biwer, Collin D. Capano, Soumi De, Miriam Cabero, Duncan A. Brown, Alexander H. Nitz, and V. Raymond. PyCBC Inference: A Python-based param- eter estimation toolkit for compact binary coalescence signals. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac., 131(996):024503, 2019. doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aaef0b

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aaef0b 2019

  59. [60]

    2021, Phys

    Geraint Pratten et al. Computationally efficient models for the dominant and subdominant harmonic modes of precessing binary black holes. Phys. Rev. D, 103(10): 104056, 2021. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.104056

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.104056 2021

  60. [61]

    Nicolas Yunes, K. G. Arun, Emanuele Berti, and Clif- ford M. Will. Post-circular expansion of eccentric bi- nary inspirals: Fourier-domain waveforms in the station- ary phase approximation. Phys. Rev. D, 80:084001, Oct

    work page

  61. [62]

    URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.80.084001

    doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.084001. URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.80.084001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.80.084001

  62. [63]

    E. A. Huerta, Prayush Kumar, Sean T. McWilliams, Richard O’Shaughnessy, and Nicol´ as Yunes. Accurate and efficient waveforms for compact binaries on eccen- tric orbits. Phys. Rev. D, 90:084016, Oct 2014. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.084016. URLhttps://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.084016

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.084016 2014

  63. [64]

    LISA Sensitivity and SNR Calculations

    Stanislav Babak, Antoine Petiteau, and Martin Hewit- son. LISA Sensitivity and SNR Calculations. arXiv e-prints, 8 2021

    work page 2021

  64. [65]

    Fundamentals of the orbit and response for TianQin

    Xin-Chun Hu, Xiao-Hong Li, Yan Wang, Wen-Fan Feng, Ming-Yue Zhou, Yi-Ming Hu, Shou-Cun Hu, Jian-Wei Mei, and Cheng-Gang Shao. Fundamentals of the orbit and response for TianQin. Class. Quant. Grav., 35(9): 095008, 2018. doi: 10.1088/1361-6382/aab52f

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aab52f 2018

  65. [66]

    Cornish and Louis J

    Neil J. Cornish and Louis J. Rubbo. The LISA response function. Phys. Rev. D, 67:022001, 2003. doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevD.67.029905. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 67, 029905 (2003)]

    work page 2003

  66. [67]

    P. C. Peters. Gravitational Radiation and the Motion of Two Point Masses. Phys. Rev., 136:B1224–B1232, 1964. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.136.B1224

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.136.b1224 1964

  67. [68]

    Baker, and Tito Dal Canton

    Sylvain Marsat, John G. Baker, and Tito Dal Canton. Exploring the bayesian parameter estimation of binary black holes with lisa. Phys. Rev. D, 103:083011, Apr

    work page

  68. [69]

    URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.083011

    doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.083011. URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.083011

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.083011

  69. [70]

    Sylvain Marsat and John G. Baker. Fourier-domain mod- ulations and delays of gravitational-wave signals. arXiv e-prints, 2018. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.1806.10734. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.10734

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1806.10734 2018

  70. [71]

    P. A. R. Ade et al. Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmolog- ical parameters. Astron. Astrophys., 594:A13, 2016. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525830

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525830 2015

  71. [72]

    GWSpace: a multi-mission science data simulator for space-based gravitational wave detection

    En-Kun Li, Han Wang, Hong-Yu Chen, Huimin Fan, Ya-Nan Li, Zhi-Yuan Li, Zheng-Cheng Liang, Xiang-Yu Lyu, Tian-Xiao Wang, Zheng Wu, Chang-Qing Ye, Xue- Ting Zhang, Yiming Hu, and Jianwei Mei. GWSpace: a multi-mission science data simulator for space-based gravitational wave detection. Class. Quant. Grav., 42 (16):165005, 2025. doi: 10.1088/1361-6382/adf409

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/adf409 2025

  72. [73]

    Abbott et al

    R. Abbott et al. GWTC-2.1: Deep extended cata- log of compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first half of the third observing run. Phys. Rev. D, 109(2):022001, 2024. doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevD.109.022001

    work page 2024

  73. [74]

    Lenon, Alexander H

    Amber K. Lenon, Alexander H. Nitz, and Duncan A. Brown. Measuring the eccentricity of GW170817 and GW190425. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 497(2):1966– 1971, 2020. doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2120

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2120 1966

  74. [75]

    Feng, F.F

    Eamonn O’Shea and Prayush Kumar. Correlations in gravitational-wave reconstructions from eccentric bina- ries: A case study with GW151226 and GW170608.Phys. Rev. D, 108(10):104018, 7 2023. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD. 108.104018

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd 2023

  75. [76]

    Marc Favata, Chunglee Kim, K. G. Arun, JeongCho Kim, and Hyung Won Lee. Constraining the orbital eccentric- ity of inspiralling compact binary systems with Advanced LIGO. Phys. Rev. D, 105(2):023003, January 2022. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.023003

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.023003 2022

  76. [77]

    Signal-to-noise ratio analytic formulae of the inspiral bi- nary black holes in TianQin

    Hong-Yu Chen, Han Wang, En-Kun Li, and Yi-Ming Hu. Signal-to-noise ratio analytic formulae of the inspiral bi- nary black holes in TianQin. Class. Quant. Grav., 42 (15):155010, 2025. doi: 10.1088/1361-6382/adecd9

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/adecd9 2025

  77. [78]

    A. G. Abac et al. GW231123: a Binary Black Hole Merger with Total Mass 190-265M ⊙. 7 2025

    work page 2025

  78. [79]

    The effect of mission duration on LISA science objectives

    Pau Amaro Seoane et al. The effect of mission duration on LISA science objectives. Gen. Rel. Grav., 54(1):3,

    work page

  79. [80]

    doi: 10.1007/s10714-021-02889-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s10714-021-02889-x

  80. [81]

    Romero-Shaw, Davide Gerosa, and Nicholas Loutrel

    Isobel M. Romero-Shaw, Davide Gerosa, and Nicholas Loutrel. Eccentricity or spin precession? Distinguishing subdominant effects in gravitational-wave data. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 519(4):5352–5357, 2023. doi: 10. 1093/mnras/stad031

    work page 2023

Showing first 80 references.