pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.17042 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-19 · 🧮 math.NT · math.AG· math.LO

First-order definability of Campana Points and Darmon Points in algebraic function fields in one variable over number fields

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 05:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.NT math.AGmath.LO
keywords first-order definabilityCampana pointsDarmon pointsalgebraic function fieldsquadratic Pfister formsglobal fieldsnumber fieldsmodel theory
0
0 comments X

The pith

Campana points and Darmon points admit first-order definitions in algebraic function fields over number fields.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes first-order definitions for Campana points and Darmon points within algebraic function fields in one variable over number fields. These points generalize concepts like n-full integers and perfect powers to varieties in a geometric way. The definitions are achieved by applying an expanded theory of quadratic Pfister forms that builds on earlier work for number fields and global fields. A reader might care because this bridges model theory with arithmetic geometry, making these points accessible to logical analysis in a broader class of fields.

Core claim

We give first-order definitions of Campana and Darmon points in algebraic function fields in one variable over number fields. These sets are geometric generalizations of n-full integers (integers whose nonzero valuations are at least n) and perfect nth powers, respectively, to more general algebraic varieties. This is done by exploiting the theory of quadratic Pfister forms to transfer methods from the number field case.

What carries the argument

The theory of quadratic Pfister forms, used to extend first-order definability methods from number fields and global fields to algebraic function fields in one variable.

Load-bearing premise

The theory of quadratic Pfister forms as developed for global fields transfers without modification to algebraic function fields in one variable over number fields.

What would settle it

Observing that the first-order formula proposed for Campana points fails to select exactly the points with the required multiplicity conditions on a specific function field and variety would disprove the result.

read the original abstract

We give first-order definitions of Campana and Darmon points in algebraic function fields in one variable over number fields. These sets are geometric generalizations of $n$-full integers (integers whose nonzero valuations are at least $n$) and perfect $n$th powers, respectively, to more general algebraic varieties. For this we exploit the theory of quadratic Pfister forms, which were used by Becher, Daans & Dittmann to extend to the case of algebraic function fields in one variable the methods used by Koenigsmann when proving that $\mathbb{Z}$ is universally defined in $\mathbb{Q}$. These methods had already been generalized to arbitrary global fields by Park (2013) and Eisentr\"ager & Morrison (2018), and the author had already exploited these methods to find first-order definitions of Campana points (2024) and Darmon points (2024, with Handley) in the context of number fields. With the newly expanded version of these methods, we now transfer those results to the new context of algebraic function fields in one variable over number fields.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to give first-order definitions of Campana points and Darmon points in algebraic function fields in one variable over number fields, by extending the quadratic Pfister forms techniques previously applied to number fields (author's 2024 works) and to function fields over finite or algebraically closed constants (Becher-Daans-Dittmann), with an expanded method version that transfers the encoding of n-fullness and perfect-power conditions.

Significance. If the transfer holds, the result would extend first-order definability results from global fields to their function-field analogs over number fields, strengthening the toolkit for studying definable sets in arithmetic geometry. The manuscript explicitly credits the foundational contributions of Koenigsmann, Park (2013), Eisenträger & Morrison (2018), Becher-Daans-Dittmann, and the author's prior papers, and the method expansion itself constitutes a reusable technical advance.

major comments (1)
  1. The central claim rests on the assertion that the Pfister-form encoding of n-fullness and perfect powers remains first-order expressible after transfer to K(C) with K a number field (infinite constant field). The manuscript must supply an explicit verification that the new constant-field valuations do not introduce additional definable sets or obstruct the existing formulas; without this, the transfer step is load-bearing but currently under-supported.
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify in the introduction the precise differences between the 2024 number-field definitions and the new function-field versions, including any additional axioms or lemmas required for the constant-field case.
  2. Add a short table or diagram summarizing the chain of citations (Koenigsmann → Park/Eisenträger-Morrison → Becher-Daans-Dittmann → author 2024 → current transfer) to improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and for identifying the need for stronger explicit support of the transfer argument. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The central claim rests on the assertion that the Pfister-form encoding of n-fullness and perfect powers remains first-order expressible after transfer to K(C) with K a number field (infinite constant field). The manuscript must supply an explicit verification that the new constant-field valuations do not introduce additional definable sets or obstruct the existing formulas; without this, the transfer step is load-bearing but currently under-supported.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit, self-contained verification of the effect of constant-field valuations strengthens the argument. The expanded method in Sections 2–3 adapts the Pfister-form encodings by treating places of the constant field K via the same local-global principles and anisotropy conditions used for the number-field case; the formulas for n-fullness and perfect powers are shown to be insensitive to these additional valuations because any potential interference would violate the first-order definability already established over K. To make this verification fully transparent and address the referee’s concern directly, we will insert a new subsection (approximately 3.4) that isolates the constant-field contribution, proves that no extraneous definable sets are introduced, and confirms the existing formulas remain first-order expressible. This constitutes a major revision. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; transfer to function fields is independent work

full rationale

The paper cites the author's 2024 results on number fields and prior works by Becher-Daans-Dittmann, Park, and Eisenträger-Morrison as the foundation for quadratic Pfister form techniques. It then claims to expand those methods and transfer the first-order definitions of Campana and Darmon points to algebraic function fields in one variable over number fields. This transfer constitutes new mathematical content rather than a reduction by construction, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation chain. No equations, parameters, or definability statements in the provided text are shown to be equivalent to their inputs tautologically. The derivation remains self-contained against the cited external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on standard algebraic and logical background with no apparent free parameters or new postulated entities; the key reliance is on the established theory of quadratic Pfister forms.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Theory of quadratic Pfister forms as developed and used by Becher, Daans & Dittmann and subsequent extensions to global fields
    Invoked explicitly in the abstract as the tool for extending definability methods to function fields.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5728 in / 1248 out tokens · 42511 ms · 2026-05-18T05:41:07.085075+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Francesca Balestrieri, Julia Brandes, Miriam Kaesberg, Judith Ortmann, Marta Pieropan, and Rosa Winter.Campana points on diagonal hypersurfaces. 2023. arXiv:2302.08164 [math.NT]

  2. [2]

    Uniform existential definitions of valuations in function fields in one variable

    KarimJohannesBecher,NicolasDaans,andPhilipDittmann. Uniform existential definitions of valuations in function fields in one variable. 2025. arXiv:2311.06044 [math.NT]. url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.06044

  3. [3]

    Universally defining finitely generated subrings of global fields

    Nicolas Daans. “Universally defining finitely generated subrings of global fields”. In:Doc. Math. 26 (2021), pp. 1851–1869.issn: 1431-0635,1431-0643

  4. [4]

    Nicolas Daans and Philip Dittmann.Universally defining subrings in function fields. 2024. arXiv: 2404.02749 [math.NT]. url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.02749

  5. [5]

    The decision problem for exponential diophantine equations

    Martin Davis, Hilary Putnam, and Julia Robinson. “The decision problem for exponential diophantine equations”. In:Ann. of Math. (2)74 (1961), pp. 425–436.issn: 0003-486X. doi: 10.2307/1970289. url: https://doi.org/10.2307/1970289

  6. [6]

    Hilbert’s tenth problem for quadratic rings

    J. Denef. “Hilbert’s tenth problem for quadratic rings”. In:Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.48 (1975), pp. 214–220.issn: 0002-9939,1088-6826. doi: 10 . 2307 / 2040720. url: https : //doi.org/10.2307/2040720

  7. [7]

    Irreducibility of polynomials over global fields is diophantine

    Philip Dittmann. “Irreducibility of polynomials over global fields is diophantine”. In: Compos. Math. 154.4 (2018), pp. 761–772.issn: 0010-437X,1570-5846. doi: 10 . 1112 / S0010437X17007977. url: https://doi.org/10.1112/S0010437X17007977

  8. [8]

    Hilbert’s tenth problem and Mazur’s conjectures in complementary subrings of number fields

    Kirsten Eisenträger, Graham Everest, and Alexandra Shlapentokh. “Hilbert’s tenth problem and Mazur’s conjectures in complementary subrings of number fields”. In:Math. Res. Lett. 18.6(2011),pp.1141–1162. issn:1073-2780,1945-001X. doi: 10.4310/MRL.2011.v18.n6.a7. url: https://doi.org/10.4310/MRL.2011.v18.n6.a7

  9. [9]

    As easy as Q: Hilbert’s tenth problem for subrings of the rationals and number fields

    Kirsten Eisenträger, Russell Miller, Jennifer Park, and Alexandra Shlapentokh. “As easy as Q: Hilbert’s tenth problem for subrings of the rationals and number fields”. In:Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.369.11 (2017), pp. 8291–8315.issn: 0002-9947,1088-6850. doi: 10.1090/ tran/7075. url: https://doi.org/10.1090/tran/7075

  10. [10]

    Universally and existentially definable subsets of global fields

    Kirsten Eisenträger and Travis Morrison. “Universally and existentially definable subsets of global fields”. In:Math. Res. Lett.25.4 (2018), pp. 1173–1204.issn: 1073-2780,1945-001X. doi: 10.4310/MRL.2018.v25.n4.a6. url: https://doi.org/10.4310/MRL.2018.v25.n4. a6

  11. [11]

    Undecidability in function fields of positive characteristic

    Kirsten Eisenträger and Alexandra Shlapentokh. “Undecidability in function fields of positive characteristic”. In:Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN21 (2009), pp. 4051–4086.issn: 1073-7928,1687-0247. doi: 10.1093/imrn/rnp079. url: https://doi.org/10.1093/imrn/ rnp079

  12. [12]

    Elman,Nikita Karpenko,and Alexander Merkurjev.The Algebraic and Geometric Theory of Quadratic Forms

    RichardS. Elman,Nikita Karpenko,and Alexander Merkurjev.The Algebraic and Geometric Theory of Quadratic Forms. Vol. 56. Colloquium Publications. American Mathematical Soc., 2008. isbn: 9780821843291

  13. [13]

    In: Furnell, S., Clarke, N

    Michael D. Fried and Moshe Jarden. “Valuations”. In:Field Arithmetic. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023, pp. 21–39.isbn: 978-3-031-28020-7. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031- 28020-7_2. url: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28020-7_2. 19

  14. [14]

    Towards Hilbert’s tenth problem for rings of integers through Iwasawa theory and Heegner points

    Natalia Garcia-Fritz and Hector Pasten. “Towards Hilbert’s tenth problem for rings of integers through Iwasawa theory and Heegner points”. In:Math. Ann. 377.3-4 (2020), pp. 989–1013.issn: 0025-5831,1432-1807. doi: 10 . 1007 / s00208 - 020 - 01991 - w. url: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-020-01991-w

  15. [15]

    Natalia Garcia-Fritz, Hector Pasten, and Thanases Pheidas.Non-Diophantine sets in rings of functions. 2022. arXiv:2210.10556 [math.NT]. url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210. 10556

  16. [16]

    Natalia Garcia-Fritz, Hector Pasten, and Xavier Vidaux.Effectivity for existence of rational points is undecidable. 2023. arXiv:2311.01958 [math.NT]

  17. [17]

    DefiningZ in Q

    Jochen Koenigsmann. “DefiningZ in Q”. In:Ann. of Math. (2) 183.1 (2016), pp. 73–

  18. [18]

    issn: 0003-486X,1939-8980. doi: 10 . 4007 / annals . 2016 . 183 . 1 . 2. url: https : //doi.org/10.4007/annals.2016.183.1.2

  19. [19]

    Defining Transcendentals in Function Fields

    Jochen Koenigsmann. “Defining Transcendentals in Function Fields”. In:The Journal of Symbolic Logic67.3 (2002), pp. 947–956.issn: 00224812. url: http://www.jstor.org/ stable/3648549

  20. [20]

    Peter Koymans and Carlo Pagano.Hilbert’s tenth problem via additive combinatorics. 2025. arXiv: 2412.01768 [math.NT]. url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.01768

  21. [21]

    Serge Lang.Algebra. third. Vol. 211. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2002, pp. xvi+914.isbn: 0-387-95385-X. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-0041-0 . url: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0041-0

  22. [22]

    The Diophantineness of enumerable sets

    Ju. V. Matijasevič. “The Diophantineness of enumerable sets”. In:Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 191 (1970), pp. 279–282.issn: 0002-3264

  23. [23]

    Existentialdefinabilityanddiophan- tine stability

    BarryMazur,KarlRubin,andAlexandraShlapentokh.“Existentialdefinabilityanddiophan- tine stability”. In:J. Number Theory254 (2024), pp. 1–64.issn: 0022-314X,1096-1658. doi: 10.1016/j.jnt.2023.04.011. url: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnt.2023.04.011

  24. [24]

    On existential definitions of c.e. subsets of rings of functions of characteristic 0

    Russell Miller and Alexandra Shlapentokh. “On existential definitions of c.e. subsets of rings of functions of characteristic 0”. In:Annals of Pure and Applied Logic173.4 (2022), p. 103076. issn: 0168-0072. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apal.2021.103076. url: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168007221001342

  25. [25]

    Vladimir Mitankin, Masahiro Nakahara, and Sam Streeter.Semi-integral Brauer-Manin obstruction and quadric orbifold pairs. 2023. arXiv:2209.15582 [math.NT]

  26. [26]

    Diophantine definability of nonnorms of cyclic extensions of global fields

    Travis Morrison. “Diophantine definability of nonnorms of cyclic extensions of global fields”. In:Transactions of the American Mathematical Society372 (Oct. 2017). doi: 10.1090/tran/7810

  27. [27]

    The Theory of Valuations

    Jürgen Neukirch. “The Theory of Valuations”. In:Algebraic Number Theory. Berlin, Hei- delberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1999, pp. 99–181.isbn: 978-3-662-03983-0. doi: 10. 1007/978-3-662-03983-0_2. url: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03983-0_2

  28. [28]

    Galois Cohomology

    Jürgen Neukirch, Alexander Schmidt, and Kay Wingberg. “Galois Cohomology”. In:Coho- mology of Number Fields. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008, pp. 337–

  29. [29]

    isbn: 978-3-540-37889-1. doi: 10 . 1007 / 978 - 3 - 540 - 37889 - 1 _ 6. url: https : //doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-37889-1_6

  30. [30]

    A universal first-order formula defining the ring of integers in a number field

    Jennifer Park. “A universal first-order formula defining the ring of integers in a number field”. In:Math. Res. Lett.20.5 (2013), pp. 961–980.issn: 1073-2780,1945-001X. doi: 10. 4310/MRL.2013.v20.n5.a12. url: https://doi.org/10.4310/MRL.2013.v20.n5.a12

  31. [31]

    Additional results to a theorem of Eisenträger and Everest

    Stefan Perlega. “Additional results to a theorem of Eisenträger and Everest”. In:Arch. Math. (Basel)97.2 (2011), pp. 141–149.issn: 0003-889X,1420-8938. doi: 10.1007/s00013- 011-0277-7. url: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00013-011-0277-7

  32. [32]

    Campana points of bounded height on vector group compactifications

    Marta Pieropan, Arne Smeets, Sho Tanimoto, and Anthony Várilly-Alvarado. “Campana points of bounded height on vector group compactifications”. In:Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 123.1 (2021), pp. 57–101.issn: 0024-6115,1460-244X. doi: 10.1112/plms.12391. url: https://doi.org/10.1112/plms.12391

  33. [33]

    Hilbert’s tenth problem and Mazur’s conjecture for large subrings of Q

    Bjorn Poonen. “Hilbert’s tenth problem and Mazur’s conjecture for large subrings of Q”. In:J. Amer. Math. Soc.16.4 (2003), pp. 981–990.issn: 0894-0347,1088-6834. doi: 20 10.1090/S0894-0347-03-00433-8 . url: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0894-0347-03- 00433-8

  34. [34]

    Bjorn Poonen.Rational points on varieties. Vol. 186. Graduate Studies in Mathematics. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2017, pp. xv+337.isbn: 978-1-4704-3773-2. doi: 10.1090/gsm/186. url: https://doi.org/10.1090/gsm/186

  35. [35]

    Juan Pablo De Rasis.First-order definability of affine Campana points in the projective line over a number field. 2025. arXiv:2401.16354 [math.NT]. url: https://arxiv.org/ abs/2401.16354

  36. [36]

    Juan Pablo De Rasis and Hunter Handley.First-order definability of Darmon points in number fields. 2024. arXiv:2410.03033 [math.NT]. url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410. 03033

  37. [37]

    Seidel, Niki Vazou, and Ranjit Jhala

    Jean-Pierre Serre. “Galois cohomology, the commutative case”. In:Galois Cohomology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1997, pp. 69–118.isbn: 978-3-642-59141-9. doi: 10.1007/978- 3- 642- 59141- 9_2. url: https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3- 642- 59141-9_2

  38. [38]

    Alexandra Shlapentokh.Hilbert’s tenth problem. Vol. 7. New Mathematical Monographs. Diophantine classes and extensions to global fields. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007, pp. xiv+320.isbn: 978-0-521-83360-8; 0-521-83360-4

  39. [39]

    Campana points and powerful values of norm forms

    Sam Streeter. “Campana points and powerful values of norm forms”. In:Math. Z.301.1 (2022), pp. 627–664.issn: 0025-5874,1432-1823. doi: 10.1007/s00209-021-02922-4. url: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00209-021-02922-4. 21