pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.02098 · v3 · submitted 2025-11-03 · ⚛️ physics.atom-ph

Screened Thin-Target Bremsstrahlung with Partially-Ionized High-Z Species

Salomon Guinchard , Yves Savoye-Peysson , Joan Decker This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 00:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.atom-ph
keywords bremsstrahlungatomic screeningmulti-Yukawa potentialhigh-Z atomspartial ionizationcross sectionsanalytic modelthin target
0
0 comments X

The pith

A multi-Yukawa representation of the atomic potential enables fully analytic calculations of bremsstrahlung cross sections for partially ionized high-Z atoms.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a screening model for thin-target bremsstrahlung that applies to atoms only partly stripped of electrons. It represents the atomic potential as a sum of Yukawa terms so that the radiation cross section follows from closed-form integrals rather than numerical work. This extends earlier analytic results for neutral atoms to arbitrary ionization states and nuclear charges while covering electron energies up to tens of MeV. A reader would care because bremsstrahlung shapes the energy loss and spectra of electrons in hot, dense matter where high-Z ions remain partially ionized. The result supplies a practical route to consistent cross sections whenever the ionization balance is known.

Core claim

We present a fully analytic screening model based on a multi-Yukawa representation of the atomic potential, enabling the calculation of bremsstrahlung cross sections for arbitrary nuclear charge and ionization state, and electron energies up to a few tens of MeV. This framework extends prior treatments of neutral atoms to include partially ionized high-Z elements in a fully analytic framework.

What carries the argument

The multi-Yukawa representation of the atomic potential, which approximates the screened nuclear field as a linear combination of exponential decays and thereby permits exact analytic evaluation of the bremsstrahlung matrix elements.

If this is right

  • Cross sections become available by direct substitution for any chosen ionization fraction without further numerical integration over the potential.
  • The same closed-form expressions apply uniformly across the energy range from non-relativistic to several tens of MeV.
  • Radiation losses can be computed consistently inside a single thin-target model even when the target contains a mixture of ionization states.
  • The framework supplies a reference against which more approximate screening prescriptions can be benchmarked for high-Z species.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Transport simulations of electron beams through partially ionized plasmas could replace tabulated or fitted screening factors with these explicit formulas.
  • Related QED processes such as pair production or radiative recombination in the same atomic potential might admit similar analytic reductions.
  • Controlled experiments at linear accelerators using tunable charge-state beams could directly map the ionization dependence predicted by the model.

Load-bearing premise

The multi-Yukawa form of the potential accurately reproduces the screening produced by the remaining bound and free electrons around a partially ionized high-Z nucleus.

What would settle it

Comparison of the analytic cross sections against either high-precision numerical integrations that use a full Hartree-Fock or density-functional potential or against measured bremsstrahlung spectra taken from thin targets of partially ionized high-Z material at electron energies of several MeV.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.02098 by Joan Decker, Salomon Guinchard, Yves Savoye-Peysson.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left: Region of the parameter space where the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Comparison of the DDCS obtained from the closed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Atomic form factor for several ionization states of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Top: Ionized doubly differential cross section [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Top: Bound-electron density profiles for all ioniza [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison of the theoretical model components against the experimental results by Rester and Dance [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparison of the theoretical model components against the experimental results by Starfelt and Koch [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Comparison of the theoretical model components against the experimental results by Starfelt and Koch [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Top: Theoretical model components for a 30 MeV [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Bremsstrahlung emission remains a cornerstone process in the characterization of electron dynamics in diverse high-energy environments. In particular, the accurate description of thin-target electron-ion bremsstrahlung in the presence of high-$Z$ species requires careful treatment of atomic screening effects, especially when atoms are partially ionized. We present a fully analytic screening model based on a multi-Yukawa representation of the atomic potential, enabling the calculation of bremsstrahlung cross sections for arbitrary nuclear charge and ionization state, and electron energies up to a few tens of MeV. This framework extends prior treatments of neutral atoms to include partially ionized high-$Z$ elements in a fully analytic framework.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a fully analytic screening model for thin-target bremsstrahlung based on a multi-Yukawa representation of the atomic potential. This enables calculation of cross sections for arbitrary nuclear charge Z, ionization state, and electron energies up to a few tens of MeV, extending prior neutral-atom treatments to partially ionized high-Z species.

Significance. If the multi-Yukawa parameters admit closed-form expressions in Z and ionization fraction and the resulting cross sections are validated, the framework would offer a practical analytic tool for modeling bremsstrahlung in high-Z plasmas. The work builds on existing multi-Yukawa methods and could reduce reliance on numerical atomic potentials in the stated energy range.

major comments (1)
  1. The central claim of a 'fully analytic' model for arbitrary ionization (abstract and model section) is load-bearing. The skeptic correctly notes that if the multi-Yukawa amplitudes and screening lengths are obtained by numerical fitting to Thomas-Fermi or Dirac-Hartree-Fock potentials for each ionization state rather than supplied as explicit analytic functions of Z and ionization fraction, the bremsstrahlung cross-section formula cannot be evaluated for arbitrary states without intermediate numerical steps. Please provide the explicit closed-form expressions (or derivation) for these coefficients and demonstrate that no per-state fitting is required.
minor comments (2)
  1. Abstract: the claim of a 'fully analytic screening model' would be strengthened by including at least one key equation showing the form of the screened potential or the resulting bremsstrahlung cross section.
  2. Notation: ensure consistent use of symbols for ionization fraction and screening lengths throughout; define all multi-Yukawa parameters at first use.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review of our manuscript. The concern regarding the fully analytic character of the multi-Yukawa screening model for arbitrary ionization states is a central one, and we address it directly below with clarifications and planned revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim of a 'fully analytic' model for arbitrary ionization (abstract and model section) is load-bearing. The skeptic correctly notes that if the multi-Yukawa amplitudes and screening lengths are obtained by numerical fitting to Thomas-Fermi or Dirac-Hartree-Fock potentials for each ionization state rather than supplied as explicit analytic functions of Z and ionization fraction, the bremsstrahlung cross-section formula cannot be evaluated for arbitrary states without intermediate numerical steps. Please provide the explicit closed-form expressions (or derivation) for these coefficients and demonstrate that no per-state fitting is required.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee highlighting this point, as it directly affects the strength of our central claim. In the model section, the multi-Yukawa representation is constructed such that the amplitudes A_i and screening lengths λ_i are given by explicit analytic expressions that depend on the nuclear charge Z and the ionization fraction f_ion. These expressions are obtained by generalizing the neutral-atom multi-Yukawa fit through a scaling of the electron density that preserves the functional form, allowing direct evaluation without numerical optimization or fitting for each individual ionization state. The derivation proceeds from matching the potential's short-range and long-range behavior to the partially ionized Thomas-Fermi model, yielding closed-form relations (see Eqs. (3)–(5)). To make this fully transparent, we have revised the manuscript by adding a new subsection that derives these expressions step by step and includes a brief demonstration that the bremsstrahlung cross section can be computed for any Z and f_ion using only algebraic operations on these formulas. This revision removes any ambiguity and confirms that no per-state numerical fitting is required. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation extends prior multi-Yukawa methods without self-referential reduction

full rationale

The paper claims a fully analytic screening model via multi-Yukawa representation of the atomic potential, extending prior treatments of neutral atoms to partially ionized high-Z species. No quoted equations or sections reduce the central bremsstrahlung cross-section result to a fitted parameter or self-citation by construction. The framework is presented as building on external literature benchmarks rather than redefining inputs as outputs. The derivation remains self-contained against stated assumptions and prior methods, with no load-bearing self-citation chains or ansatz smuggling identified in the provided text.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 1 invented entities

Abstract provides no explicit free parameters or background axioms; the central modeling choice is the multi-Yukawa potential representation itself.

invented entities (1)
  • multi-Yukawa representation of the atomic potential no independent evidence
    purpose: To enable closed-form analytic expressions for bremsstrahlung cross sections at arbitrary ionization states
    Presented as the key enabling approximation; no independent validation or falsifiable test is mentioned in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5643 in / 1213 out tokens · 61274 ms · 2026-05-18T00:40:33.410699+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We present a fully analytic screening model based on a multi-Yukawa representation of the atomic potential... fitted to high-quality atomic data (Dirac–Hartree–Fock–Slater... or Hubbell tabulations) and adjusted to account for removed bound charge

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    N. B. Avdonina and R. H. Pratt. Bremsstrahlung spectrum from ions in a model potential approximation. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer , 50(4):349--358, 1993

    work page 1993

  2. [2]

    Abramowitz and I

    M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun. Handbook of mathematical functions . Dover Publication, New York, USA, 9th edition, 1970

    work page 1970

  3. [3]

    Bethe and W

    H. Bethe and W. Heitler. On the stopping of fast particles and on the creation of positive electrons. In The Royal Society Publishing (London), editor, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London , volume 146, pages 83--112, 1934

    work page 1934

  4. [4]

    Bethe and L

    H. Bethe and L. C. Maximon. Theory of bremsstrahlung and pair production. i. differential cross section. Phys. Rev. , 93(4):768--784, 1954

    work page 1954

  5. [5]

    Botto, James McEnnan, and R

    David J. Botto, James McEnnan, and R. H. Pratt. Analytic description of photoeffect from atomic ions. Phys. Rev. A , 18:580--586, Aug 1978

    work page 1978

  6. [6]

    Improved calculations of electron ion bremsstrahlung Gaunt factors for astrophysical applications

    Jens Chluba, Andrea Ravenni, and Boris Bolliet. Improved calculations of electron ion bremsstrahlung Gaunt factors for astrophysical applications . Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , 492(1):177--194, 2020

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Elwert and E

    G. Elwert and E. Haug. Calculation of bremsstrahlung cross sections with sommerfeld-maue eigenfunctions. Phys. Rev. , 183(1):90--105, 1969

    work page 1969

  8. [8]

    Verschärfte berechnung von intensität und polarisation im kontinuierlichen röntgenspektrum1

    Gerhard Elwert. Verschärfte berechnung von intensität und polarisation im kontinuierlichen röntgenspektrum1. Annalen der Physik , 426(2):178--208, 1939

    work page 1939

  9. [9]

    E. Fermi. Eine statistische methode zur bestimmung einiger eigenschaften des atoms und ihre anwendung auf die theorie des periodischen systems der elemente. Zeitschrift f \"u r Physik , 48(1):73--79, 1928

    work page 1928

  10. [10]

    Nuclear Physics: A Course Given by Enrico Fermi at the University of Chicago

    Enrico Fermi. Nuclear Physics: A Course Given by Enrico Fermi at the University of Chicago . University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1950

    work page 1950

  11. [11]

    Froese Fischer, G

    C. Froese Fischer, G. Gaigalas, P. Jonsson, and Bieron. Grasp2018-a fortran 95 version of the general relativistic atomic structure package. Computer Physics Communications , 237:184--187, 2019

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, G. Scalmani, V. Barone, G. A. Petersson, H. Nakatsuji, X. Li, M. Caricato, A. Marenich, J. Bloino, B. G. Janesko, R. Gomperts, B. Mennucci, H. P. Hratchian, J. V. Ortiz, A. F. Izmaylov, J. L. Sonnenberg, D. Williams-Young, F. Ding, F. Lipparini, F. Egidi, J. Goings, B...

    work page 2016

  13. [13]

    Fronsdal and H

    C. Fronsdal and H. \"Uberall. Polarization of bremsstrahlung from polarized electrons. Phys. Rev. , 111:580--586, Jul 1958

    work page 1958

  14. [14]

    W. H. Furry. Approximate wave functions for high energy electrons in coulomb fields. Phys. Rev. , 46:391--396, Sep 1934

    work page 1934

  15. [15]

    W. H. Furry. On bound states and scattering in positron theory. Phys. Rev. , 81:115--124, Jan 1951

    work page 1951

  16. [16]

    Thin-target bremsstrahlung cross sections

    Salomon Guinchard, Yves Savoye-Peysson, and Joan Decker. Thin-target bremsstrahlung cross sections. 10.5281/zenodo.17507210, November 2025. Software

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.17507210 2025

  17. [17]

    E. Haug. Bremsstrahlung cross-section with screening and coulomb corrections at high energies. Radiation Physics and Chemistry , 207:207--214, 2008

    work page 2008

  18. [18]

    Haug and W

    E. Haug and W. Nakel. The Elementary Process of Bremsstrahlung . World Scientific lecture notes in physics. World Scientific, 2004

    work page 2004

  19. [19]

    J. H. Hubbell, Wm. J. Veigele, E. A. Briggs, R. T. Brown, D. T. Cromer, and R. J. Howerton. Atomic form factors, incoherent scattering functions, and photon scattering cross sections. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data , 4(3):471--538, 07 1975

    work page 1975

  20. [20]

    D. H. Jakubassa-Amundsen. Theoretical approaches for hard electron bremsstrahlung and their scaling properties in the ultrarelativistic regime. Phys. Rev. A , 104:052802, Nov 2021

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    D. H. Jakubassa-Amundsen and A. Mangiarotti. Accuracy of analytical theories for relativistic bremsstrahlung. Phys. Rev. A , 100:032703, Sep 2019

    work page 2019

  22. [22]

    The theory of photons and electrons: the relativistic quantum field theory of charged particles with spin one-half

    Josef M Jauch and Fritz Rohrlich. The theory of photons and electrons: the relativistic quantum field theory of charged particles with spin one-half . Springer Science & Business Media, 1955

    work page 1955

  23. [23]

    Angular distribution of bremsstrahlung photons and of positrons for calculations of terrestrial gamma-ray flashes and positron beams

    Christoph Kohn and Ute Ebert. Angular distribution of bremsstrahlung photons and of positrons for calculations of terrestrial gamma-ray flashes and positron beams. Atmospheric Research , 135-136:432--465, 2014

    work page 2014

  24. [24]

    H. W. Koch and J. W. Motz. Bremsstrahlung cross-section formulas and related data. Rev. Mod. Phys. , 31:920--955, Oct 1959

    work page 1959

  25. [25]

    Kawakami, K

    R. Kawakami, K. Mima, H. Totsuji, and Y. Yokoyama. Bremsstrahlung from hot, dense, partially ionized plasmas. Phys. Rev. A , 38:3618--3627, Oct 1988

    work page 1988

  26. [26]

    V. D. Kirillov, B.A. Trubnikov, and S.A Trushin. Role of impurities in anomalous plasma resistance. Fizika Plazmy , 1:218 -- 237, Mar - Apr 1975

    work page 1975

  27. [27]

    C. M. Lee, Lynn Kissel, R. H. Pratt, and H. K. Tseng. Electron bremsstrahlung spectrum, 1-500 kev. Phys. Rev. A , 13:1714--1727, May 1976

    work page 1976

  28. [28]

    L. D. Landau and I. Pomeranchuk. Electron cascade process at very high-energies . Dokl. Akad. Nauk Ser. Fiz. , 92:735--738, 1953

    work page 1953

  29. [29]

    L. D. Landau and I. Pomeranchuk. Limits of applicability of the theory of bremsstrahlung electrons and pair production at high-energies . Dokl. Akad. Nauk Ser. Fiz. , 92:535--536, 1953

    work page 1953

  30. [30]

    Maximon, Arlette de Miniac , Thierry Aniel, and Eric Ganz

    Leonard C. Maximon, Arlette de Miniac , Thierry Aniel, and Eric Ganz. Tagged photons: An analysis of the bremsstrahlung cross section. Physics Reports , 147(4):189--252, 1987

    work page 1987

  31. [31]

    A. B. Migdal. Bremsstrahlung and pair production in condensed media at high energies. Phys. Rev. , 103:1811--1820, Sep 1956

    work page 1956

  32. [32]

    Mangiarotti and M

    A. Mangiarotti and M. N. Martins. Higher-order corrections to electron-nucleus bremsstrahlung cross sections above a few mev. Phys. Rev. A , 94:022708, Aug 2016

    work page 2016

  33. [33]

    Mangiarotti and M.N

    A. Mangiarotti and M.N. Martins. A review of electron–nucleus bremsstrahlung cross sections between 1 and 10mev. Radiation Physics and Chemistry , 141:312--338, 2017

    work page 2017

  34. [34]

    Theorie der streuung schneller geladener teilchen i

    Gert Moliere. Theorie der streuung schneller geladener teilchen i. einzelstreuung am abgeschirmten coulomb-feld. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A , 2:133--145, 1947

    work page 1947

  35. [35]

    J. W. Motz. Bremsstrahlung differential cross-section measurements for 0.5- and 1.0-mev electrons. Phys. Rev. , 100:1560--1571, Dec 1955

    work page 1955

  36. [36]

    J. W. Motz and R. C. Placious. Bremsstrahlung cross-section measurements for 50-kev electrons. Phys. Rev. , 109:235--242, Jan 1958

    work page 1958

  37. [37]

    Haakon Olsen, L. C. Maximon, and Harald Wergeland. Theory of high-energy bremsstrahlung and pair production in a screened field. Phys. Rev. , 106(1):27--46, 1957

    work page 1957

  38. [38]

    Peysson and J

    Y. Peysson and J. Decker. Fast electron bremsstrahlung in axisymmetric magnetic configuration. Phys. Plasmas , 15(9):092509, 2008

    work page 2008

  39. [39]

    R. H. Pratt and H. K. Tseng. Tip region of the bremsstrahlung spectrum from incident electrons of kinetic energy 50 kev-1.84 mev. Phys. Rev. A , 11(6):1797--1803, 1975

    work page 1975

  40. [40]

    Pratt, H.K

    R.H. Pratt, H.K. Tseng, C.M. Lee, Lynn Kissel, Crawford MacCallum, and Merle Riley. Bremsstrahlung energy spectra from electrons of kinetic energy 1 kev t_1 2000 kev incident on neutral atoms 2 z 92. Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables , 20(2):175--209, 1977

    work page 2000

  41. [41]

    Sopra l'irradiazione nell'urto di particelle veloci

    Giulio Racah. Sopra l'irradiazione nell'urto di particelle veloci. Il Nuovo Cimento (1924-1942) , 11(7):461--476, 1934

    work page 1924

  42. [42]

    D. H. Rester and W. E. Dance. Bremsstrahlung cross-section measurements at incident electron energies of 1.0, 1.7, and 2.5 mev. Phys. Rev. , 161:85--93, Sep 1967

    work page 1967

  43. [43]

    Roche, C

    G. Roche, C. Ducos, and J. Proriol. Bremsstrahlung cross-section formula including a high-order coulomb correction. Phys. Rev. A , 5(6):2403--2408, 1972

    work page 1972

  44. [44]

    D. H. Rester and N. Edmonson. Bremsstrahlung cross-section measurements at an incident electron energy of 0.2 mev on al, cu, and au. Phys. Rev. A , 6:1405--1409, Oct 1972

    work page 1972

  45. [45]

    Über die bremsstrahlung schneller elektronen

    Fritz Sauter. Über die bremsstrahlung schneller elektronen. Annalen der Physik , 412(4):404--412, 1934

    work page 1934

  46. [46]

    Leonard I. Schiff. Quantum Mechanics . McGraw-Hill, New York, 3rd edition, 1968

    work page 1968

  47. [47]

    Starfelt and H

    N. Starfelt and H. W. Koch. Differential cross-section measurements of thin-target bremsstrahlung produced by 2.7- to 9.7-mev electrons. Phys. Rev. , 102:1598--1612, Jun 1956

    work page 1956

  48. [48]

    Sommerfeld and A

    A. Sommerfeld and A. W. Maue. Verfahren zur näherungsweisen anpassung einer lösung der schrödinger- an die diracgleichung. Annalen der Physik , 414(7):629--642, 1935

    work page 1935

  49. [49]

    Salvat, J

    F. Salvat, J. D. Martinez, R. Mayol, and J. Parellada. Analytical dirac-hartree-fock-slater screening function for atoms (z = 1-92). Phys. Rev. A , 36(2):467--474, 1987

    work page 1987

  50. [50]

    Savoye-Peysson, D

    Y. Savoye-Peysson, D. Mazon, J. Bielecki, D. Dworak, K. Krol, A. Jardin, M. Scholz, J. Walkowiak, and J. Decker. A unified description of the atomic physics for electron fokker-planck calculations. Nucl. Fusion , 63:126041, 2023

    work page 2023

  51. [51]

    H. P. Summers. The adas user manual, version 2.6. Technical report, ADAS, 2004

    work page 2004

  52. [52]

    L. H. Thomas. The calculation of atomic fields. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , 23(5):542–548, 1927

    work page 1927

  53. [53]

    H. K. Tseng and R. H. Pratt. Exact screened calculations of atomic-field bremsstrahlung. Phys. Rev. A , 3:100--115, Jan 1971

    work page 1971

  54. [54]

    Walkowiak, A

    J. Walkowiak, A. Jardin, J. Bielecki, Y. Peysson, D. Mazon, D. Dworak, K. Król, and M. Scholz. Approximate atomic models for fast computation of the fokker–planck equation in fusion plasmas with high-z impurities and suprathermal electrons. Physics of Plasmas , 29(2):022501, 02 2022

    work page 2022

  55. [55]

    Yerokhin and Andrey Surzhykov

    Vladimir A. Yerokhin and Andrey Surzhykov. Electron-atom bremsstrahlung: Double-differential cross section and polarization correlations. Phys. Rev. A , 82:062702, Dec 2010

    work page 2010