Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 50 references

Demand-side decarbonisation at scale via MaaS-integrated carbon incentives

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that a carbon-market-financed MaaS incentive in Beijing raised low-carbon trips by 20.3% and reduced annual CO2 by about 94,000 tonnes.

desk verdict First city-scale evidence that MaaS carbon incentives shift behavior, but the headline CO2 figure rests on a circular counterfactual and should not be taken at face value. read the letter →

arxiv 2511.09237 v2 pith:NURDUFR7 submitted 2025-11-12 stat.AP

Bing Liu , Yuan Liao , Sonia Yeh , Oded Cats , Kristian S. Nielsen , Zhenning Dong , Yong Wang , Yi Li
show 3 more authors
Yanli Liu Zirui Ni Xiaolei Ma
This is my paper
classification stat.AP
keywords carbonincentivesMobility-as-a-ServiceMaaStravelbehaviordifference-in-differencespropensityscorematchingrandomforestaccounting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper set out to answer whether a carbon-incentive program embedded in a citywide Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) platform can shift travel behavior and cut CO2 at scale. Using 4.82 billion passively collected trip records from about 2.96 million people in Beijing over 13 months, it finds that enrolled participants increased their monthly low-carbon trip share by 20.3% relative to a matched control group, with a 12.8% increase still present eight months later. A random-forest counterfactual implies a 1.8% citywide decline in gasoline-car trips and an annual reduction of 94,353 tonnes CO2, about 5.7% of certified reductions traded in Beijing's carbon market in 2023. The authors frame these results as the first large-scale real-world evidence for market-financed digital incentives in MaaS, while explicitly noting that the carbon figure is model-dependent. If correct, the finding matters because it suggests a financially self-sustaining, behaviorally effective demand-side tool for urban transport decarbonization.

What carries the argument

The central object is the carbon-incentive program itself: verified emission reductions from subway, bus, and cycling trips are aggregated and sold in Beijing's carbon market, and the revenue funds rewards for users within the MaaS platform. The analysis rests on three pieces: (1) a propensity-score-matched difference-in-differences model for the causal behavioral effect; (2) a random-forest counterfactual, trained on pre-enrollment trips with features such as departure time, origin, destination, duration, workday, and date, that predicts counterfactual mode choice to compute mode-shift ratios and emission reductions; and (3) a graph-convolutional network with zone-level embeddings plus line

What would settle it

Take the trained random forest and apply it to the non-participant sample in the post-enrollment months; if its predicted mode shares diverge significantly from the observed mode shares of non-participants (who were not exposed to the program), the counterfactual foundation for the 1.8% car-trip reduction and 94,353 t CO2 figure is invalid.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that a MaaS-embedded carbon incentive can measurably shift mode choice at unprecedented scale. The behavioral effect is identified through propensity-score matching and a time-varying difference-in-differences design on a panel of 632,376 participants and 1,264,753 controls: participation raised monthly low-carbon trip share by 20.3 percentage points, with pre-enrollment trends near zero and no placebo effect. The carbon effect is derived from a random forest trained on pre-enrollment trips that predicts each participant's most likely mode absent the program; comparing actual modes to predicted ones yields a 1.8% reduction in citywide gasoline-car trips and 94,353 t

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the random-forest model trained on pre-enrollment trip attributes correctly predicts the travel modes participants would have used without the program—even though those same attributes (duration, distance) are altered by the program itself.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the behavioral effect is real, carbon-market-financed digital incentives can serve as a scalable, cost-recovering complement to infrastructure and technology measures for urban transport decarbonization.
  • The persistence of the effect (still 12.8% after eight months) suggests that repeated micro-incentives can create lasting habit change, not just short-term spikes.
  • The concentration of effects in zones with dense subway networks indicates that a program like this works best where low-carbon alternatives already exist, so infrastructure and incentives are complementary rather than substitutes.
  • A 1.8% reduction in gasoline-car trips at the city level, if replicated elsewhere, would put a MaaS incentive program on the same order as many conventional transport demand-management policies.
  • The heterogeneous responses across demographic and income groups point to room for adaptive reward design and targeted recruitment to raise overall effectiveness and address equity.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: The carbon-reduction estimate inherits any bias in the random forest's counterfactual; because trip duration and distance are among its inputs, and the program itself changes both, the 1.8% car-trip decline could be overstated or understated depending on how the model extrapolates.
  • Editorial inference: A direct test of the counterfactual would be to apply the trained random forest to non-participants and compare its predicted mode distribution to their actual modes in the same period; if accuracy degrades materially, the CO2 accounting needs rethinking.
  • Editorial inference: The authors do not disentangle the behavioral mechanism—reward value, environmental framing, or gamification; distinguishing these would help predict whether the effect transfers to cities with different carbon price levels or platform designs.
  • Editorial inference: The observed lower response among low-income users raises an equity question; future pilots could test whether adjusting reward amounts or payment timing changes uptake among lower-income groups.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper evaluates a carbon-incentive program embedded in the Gaode MaaS platform in Beijing. Using 13 months of passively collected trip data from roughly 2.96 million users and a matched control group, the authors estimate a difference-in-differences effect of program enrollment on the monthly low-carbon trip share (reported as 20.3%), with event-study and placebo tests supporting the parallel-trends assumption. They then use a random-forest model trained on pre-enrollment trips to infer counterfactual modes for post-enrollment trips, from which they compute an estimated citywide 1.8% decline in gasoline-car trips and annual CO2 reductions of 94,353 tonnes (about 5.7% of Beijing's 2023 certified reductions). The paper also reports heterogeneity by gender, age, income, trip frequency, and urban zone characteristics. The abstract and discussion explicitly acknowledge that the emission estimate is model-dependent and that unobserved selection is a threat to causal identification.

Significance. The study's data scale (4.82 billion trip records, millions of users) and the use of passively collected records are major strengths, as are the matched DiD design, the event-study visualization, and the placebo test for the behavioral outcome. If the behavioral effect survives scrutiny, this would be one of the first city-scale demonstrations that MaaS-embedded carbon incentives can shift mode share. The authors also deserve credit for explicitly labeling the emission number as model-dependent rather than as a directly observed program effect. However, the headline emission reduction is not yet supported: the random-forest counterfactual is constructed from post-treatment features, and the citywide scaling uses an aggregate trip share rather than mode-specific shares. The paper is therefore best viewed as a credible behavioral evaluation with an as-yet-unverified carbon-accounting layer.

major comments (4)
  1. [Methods: 'Estimation of the impacts of incentives on carbon emission reductions'; Results: 'Noticeable carbon emissions] The random-forest counterfactual feeding Eqs. (8)–(10) uses travel duration as a feature, and enrollment itself increases trip duration by 7.4 min (Fig. 2b; Tables S13–S16). A car trip that shifts to subway is observed with subway duration, so a model trained on pre-enrollment trips will tend to predict 'subway' rather than 'car,' mechanically hiding the very shift the analysis aims to count. The reported pre-enrollment accuracy (0.88) does not validate predictions under this post-treatment distribution shift. Please re-estimate the counterfactual using only exogenous features (e.g., origin, destination, time of day, day type, individual covariates) and report how the 14.1% car-trip decline, the 1.8% citywide decline, and the 94,353 t CO2 figure vary. The current estimate is not merely uncertain; it is biased toward the program's intended mode shift.
  2. [Results: 'Noticeable carbon emissions reduction benefits' (citywide scaling)] The 1.8% citywide decline in gasoline-car trips is derived from the participant-level decline (14.1%) and the statement that participants accounted for 12.6% of all daily trips. A mode-specific percentage change should be weighted by participants' share of gasoline-car trips, not by their share of all trips. If participants are less car-dependent than non-participants, 12.6% overstates the relevant weight; if they are more car-dependent, it understates it. Please report mode-specific trip shares and use them for the scaling calculation.
  3. [Abstract and Results: 'The MaaS incentive program increased low-carbon travel'] The abstract reports a '20.3 percentage-point increase in the monthly low-carbon travel share,' while the Results report a '20.3% increase relative to the matched control group' and a first-month increase of 20.4%. These are different quantities unless the baseline share is exactly 100%. Please state the baseline mean and report the coefficient in consistent units (percentage points vs. percent relative change) with confidence intervals.
  4. [Methods and Discussion: sample-size reconciliation and selection sensitivity] The manuscript reports 3,983,027 registered program participants in Methods, 2,958,841 users in the final trip dataset, and a matched panel of 632,376 participants. It is unclear which sample underlies each analysis (behavioral DiD, carbon accounting, citywide scaling). The Discussion acknowledges that propensity-score matching cannot remove unobserved self-selection; given the voluntary enrollment, please state the analysis sample for each result and, if feasible, provide a sensitivity analysis (e.g., Oster's delta or bounds) quantifying how large unobserved selection would need to be to overturn the headline behavioral effect.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] The paper uses 'tons' and 'tonnes' interchangeably (e.g., '94,000 tons' vs. '94,353 tonnes'). Use metric tonnes consistently.
  2. [Results: 'Urban characteristics associated with stronger behavioral responses'] The statement 'subway network density exceeds 0.7 km²' should presumably be a density expressed in km/km²; please correct the units.
  3. [Methods: Eq. (9)] The abbreviation 'RCT' for the reduction in car travel ratio is confusing because RCT usually denotes randomized controlled trial; please rename, e.g., 'CRT' or spell out in full.
  4. [Methods: Eq. (2)] The definition of D_P_it,k is difficult to follow ('equals 1 for any period k that occurs after or during t-ST' reads backwards relative to the reference period). Please clarify the indexing so readers can map leads/lags to calendar months.
  5. [References] Some reference entries are incomplete or poorly formatted (e.g., reference 32 begins with 'Su Song, Miaoqing Zhong, D. T.'). Please check the reference list against journal style.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Random-forest counterfactual uses post-treatment trip duration as input, making the 94,353 t CO2 and 1.8% car-trip figures endogenous to the behavior they measure; the central DiD estimate remains independent.

  1. other [Methods, 'Estimation of the impacts of incentives on carbon emission reductions'; Results, 'Noticeable carbon emissions reduction benefits'; Eqs. (8)-(10)]
    "The random forest model inputs included the departure time, origin, destination, travel duration, workday status, and travel date for each trip. ... average trip duration increased by 7.4 minutes (P=0.003) and trip distance by 2.8 kilometers (P=0.01) immediately after enrollment"

    Eqs. (8)-(10) compute mode-shift ratios and emission reductions from PA_tij, the number of trips whose random-forest-predicted 'preferred mode' differs from the actual mode. The random forest predicts preferred mode using travel duration as an input, but enrollment itself changes travel duration, and duration is determined by the actual mode chosen. For a post-enrollment trip that shifted from car to subway, the observed subway duration is fed into the model, making it likely to predict subway as the preferred mode and hiding the shift. Thus the counterfactual is not independent of the realized outcome; the 1.8% car-trip decline and 94,353 t CO2 are partly a function of the very behavior they claim to estimate.

full rationale

The central behavioral claim—the 20.3 percentage-point increase in monthly low-carbon travel share—is computed directly from observed matched-panel data via difference-in-differences and event-study designs; it does not reduce to any fitted parameter and has independent empirical content. The carbon-accounting scenario, however, is explicitly model-dependent, as the paper states: 'This estimate is model-dependent rather than a directly observed or causally identified program effect.' The random-forest counterfactual uses post-treatment travel duration as an input, and duration is itself an outcome of the mode shift being measured. This creates a self-referential dependence in the carbon estimates, but it is not an algebraic identity: the predicted mode is not equal to the actual mode by construction, and the bias could in principle go in either direction. The paper also acknowledges selection-bias limitations. No self-citation chain, imported uniqueness theorem, or ansatz-smuggling via citation is load-bearing. Because the main behavioral result is independent and the carbon estimate is an explicitly disclosed model-dependent scenario rather than a disguised fit, the overall circularity score is moderate rather than high.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's headline CO2 figure is not a direct measurement: it adds a counterfactual random-forest model to observed data. The DiD estimate is standard quasi-experimental but observational, and the causal claim depends on unobserved-confounding assumptions.

free parameters (3)
  • PSM matching caliper and ratio = 0.25 SD, 1:2
    Nearest-neighbor greedy matching with caliper 0.25 SD and 1:2 matching; analysis choices that define the matched sample.
  • Income thresholds from phone value = 5,000 / 8,000 CNY
    Used to classify income level from phone value; affects PSM covariates and heterogeneity analysis.
  • GCN hyperparameters = lr=0.001, dropout=0.35, 500 epochs
    Used in urban clustering; not central to the CO2 estimate but affects spatial conclusions.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Unobserved confounding is absent after PSM; parallel trends imply no divergent selection.
    The DiD causal interpretation rests on this; the authors explicitly acknowledge it may fail.
  • domain assumption Random-forest-predicted preferred mode equals the true counterfactual mode absent the program.
    Carbon accounting rests on this; it is not directly validated.
  • domain assumption Gaode data are representative: low-carbon trip counts match smartcard/e-payment records within 10%.
    Validity benchmark and citywide scaling via participant 12.6% share of daily trips.
  • standard math Carbon emission factors per mode from Supplementary Note 2 apply.
    Emission factors are taken as inputs from prior literature; no derivation is shown in the main text.
  • domain assumption The 500x500m zone grid and network density metrics capture relevant urban infrastructure.
    Spatial heterogeneity analysis depends on these choices.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Demand-side decarbonisation at scale via MaaS-integrated carbon incentives." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NURDUFR7

@misc{pith2026251109237,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Demand-side decarbonisation at scale via MaaS-integrated carbon incentives},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NURDUFR7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.09237}
}
read the original abstract

Digital carbon incentives are increasingly used to promote low-carbon travel, but city-scale evidence on their behavioral and carbon-accounting implications remains limited. We evaluated a carbon-incentive program on a Beijing Mobility-as-a-Service platform using 4.82 billion trips from 2.96 million users over 13 months, with a matched panel of enrolled and non-enrolled users. Enrollment was associated with a 20.3 percentage-point increase in the monthly low-carbon travel share, with pre-enrollment trends remaining near zero across event-study tests. A random-forest accounting scenario trained on pre-enrollment data implied a 1.8% citywide decline in gasoline-car trips and annual reductions of 94,353 tonnes of CO2, equivalent to 5.7% of the certified reductions traded in Beijing's carbon market in 2023. This estimate is model-dependent rather than a directly observed or causally identified program effect. Larger program-associated responses were concentrated in areas with greater transit access. These results show that carbon-market-financed digital incentives can support measurable low-carbon travel responses at the city scale.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references

  1. [1]

    & Seto, K

    Solecki, W., Roberts, D. & Seto, K. C. Strategies to improve the impact of the IPCC Special Report on Climate Change and Cities. Nat. Clim. Chang. 14, 685–691 (2024)

    2024

  2. [2]

    Sovacool, B. K. et al. Policy prescriptions to address energy and transport poverty in the United Kingdom. Nat. Energy 8, 273–283 (2023)

    2023

  3. [3]

    van, Ogilvie, D., Patterson, R

    Xiao, C., Sluijs, E. van, Ogilvie, D., Patterson, R. & Panter, J. Shifting towards healthier transport: carrots or sticks? Systematic review and meta-analysis of population-level interventions. Lancet Planet. Heal. 6, e858–e869 (2022)

    2022

  4. [4]

    Fu, X. et al. Co-benefits of transport demand reductions from compact urban development in Chinese cities. Nat. Sustain. 7, 294–304 (2024)

    2024

  5. [5]

    & Bamberg, S

    Javaid, A., Creutzig, F. & Bamberg, S. Determinants of low-carbon transport mode adoption: systematic review of reviews. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 103002 (2020)

    2020

  6. [6]

    & Babacan, O

    Winkler, L., Pearce, D., Nelson, J. & Babacan, O. The effect of sustainable mobility transition policies on cumulative urban transport emissions and energy demand. Nat. Commun. 14, 1–14 (2023)

    2023

  7. [7]

    & Creutzig, F

    Liotta, C., Viguié , V. & Creutzig, F. Environmental and welfare gains via urban transport policy portfolios across 120 cities. Nat. Sustain. 2023 69 6, 1067–1076 (2023)

    2023

  8. [8]

    Jittrapirom, P. et al. Mobility as a service: A critical review of definitions, assessments of schemes, and key challenges. Urban Plan. 2, 13–25 (2017)

    2017

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    Ramaswami, A. et al. Carbon analytics for net-zero emissions sustainable cities. Nat. Sustain. 4, 460–463 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    & Polydoropoulou, A

    Tsouros, I., Tsirimpa, A., Pagoni, I. & Polydoropoulou, A. MaaS users: Who they are and how much they are willing-to-pay. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 148, 470–480 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    Technology, I. A. C. Global Mobility As A Service Market – Industry Trends and Forecast to

  4. [12]

    M., Nicolaï , I

    Reyes Madrigal, L. M., Nicolaï , I. & Puchinger, J. Pedestrian mobility in Mobility as a Service (MaaS): sustainable value potential and policy implications in the Paris region case. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 15, 1–20 (2023)

    2023

  5. [13]

    & Paz, A

    Butler, L., Yigitcanlar, T. & Paz, A. Barriers and risks of Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) adoption in cities: A systematic review of the literature. Cities 109, 103036 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    AR6 Synthesis Report: Climate Change 2023

    Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. AR6 Synthesis Report: Climate Change 2023. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-cycle/

    2023

  7. [15]

    & Esztergá r-Kiss, D

    Kriswardhana, W. & Esztergá r-Kiss, D. Exploring the aspects of MaaS adoption based on college students’ preferences. Transp. Policy 136, 113–125 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    & Walther, G

    Frank, L., Klopfer, A. & Walther, G. Designing corporate mobility as a service – Decision support and perspectives. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 182, 104011 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    & Johansson, D

    Morfeldt, J. & Johansson, D. J. A. Impacts of shared mobility on vehicle lifetimes and on the carbon footprint of electric vehicles. Nat. Commun. 13, 1–11 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    & Zhao, J

    Diao, M., Kong, H. & Zhao, J. Impacts of transportation network companies on urban mobility. Nat. Sustain. 4, 494–500 (2021)

    2021

  11. [19]

    E., Nikitas, N

    Nikitas, A., Cotet, C., Vitel, A. E., Nikitas, N. & Prato, C. Transport stakeholders ’ perceptions of Mobility-as-a-Service: A Q-study of cultural shift proponents, policy advocates and technology supporters. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 181, 103964 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    M., Auvinen, H., Tuominen, A., Fearnley, N

    Ydersbond, I. M., Auvinen, H., Tuominen, A., Fearnley, N. & Aarhaug, J. Nordic experiences with smart mobility: Emerging services and regulatory frameworks. Transp. Res. Procedia 49, 130–144 (2020)

    2020

  13. [21]

    F., Bé langer, J

    Nisa, C. F., Bé langer, J. J., Schumpe, B. M. & Faller, D. G. Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials testing behavioural interventions to promote household action on climate change. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–13 (2019)

    2019

  14. [22]

    Whim launch in Birmingham: new day dawning

    ITS International. Whim launch in Birmingham: new day dawning. https://www.itsinternational.com/its17/feature/whim-launch-birmingham-new-day-dawning (2018)

    2018

  15. [23]

    & Del Duce, A

    Hoerler, R., Stü nzi, A., Patt, A. & Del Duce, A. What are the factors and needs promoting mobility-as-a-service? Findings from the Swiss Household Energy Demand Survey (SHEDS). Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 12, 1–16 (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    & Timmermans, H

    Caiati, V., Rasouli, S. & Timmermans, H. Bundling, pricing schemes and extra features preferences for mobility as a service: Sequential portfolio choice experiment. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 131, 123–148 (2020)

    2020

  17. [25]

    & Hanaoka, T

    Zhang, R. & Hanaoka, T. Cross-cutting scenarios and strategies for designing decarbonization pathways in the transport sector toward carbon neutrality. Nat. Commun. 13, (2022)

    2022

  18. [26]

    Q., Mulley, C

    Ho, C. Q., Mulley, C. & Hensher, D. A. Public preferences for mobility as a service: Insights from stated preference surveys. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 131, 70–90 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    & Brynjolfsson, E

    Ahmad, W., Sen, A., Eesley, C. & Brynjolfsson, E. Companies inadvertently fund online misinformation despite consumer backlash. Nature 630, 123–131 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    S., Qin, P., Quan, Y., Li, J

    Tan-Soo, J. S., Qin, P., Quan, Y., Li, J. & Wang, X. Using cost–benefit analyses to identify key opportunities in demand-side mitigation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 1–7 (2024) doi:10.1038/s41558- 024-02146-4

    2024 doi

  21. [29]

    & Schwarz, M

    Koch, N., Naumann, L., Pretis, F., Ritter, N. & Schwarz, M. Attributing agnostically detected large reductions in road CO2 emissions to policy mixes. Nat. Energy 7, 844–853 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    Plö tz, P., Axsen, J., Funke, S. A. & Gnann, T. Designing car bans for sustainable transportation. Nat. Sustain. 2, 534–536 (2019)

    2019

  23. [31]

    The city encourages citizens to go green in a carbon-inclusive way

    Beijing Daily. The city encourages citizens to go green in a carbon-inclusive way. The People’s Government of Beijing Municipality https://www.beijing.gov.cn/renwen/sy/whkb/202009/t20200911_2057908.html#

  24. [32]

    Su Song, Miaoqing Zhong, D. T. How Mobility-as-a-Service Platforms Can Pilot Greener Travel Behaviors. World Resources Institute https://thecityfix.com/blog/how-mobility-as-a- service-can-encourage-greener-travel/ (2023)

    2023

  25. [33]

    Beijing Municipal Commision of Transport. Beijing’s MaaS platform launched the ‘MaaS Travel, Green City’ initiative, which is the first in China to encourage citizens to participate in green travel in all ways in a carbon-inclusive way. Beijing Municipal Commision of Transport...

    2020

  26. [34]

    The incentive effect of green travel has begun to appear, and a total of 2.45 million people have been served

    Beijing Municipal Commision of Transport. The incentive effect of green travel has begun to appear, and a total of 2.45 million people have been served. Beijing Municipal Commision of Transport https://jtw.beijing.gov.cn/xxgk/xwfbh/202011/t20201103_2127960.html (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    China, B. G. E. Beijing Carbon Emissions Trading Platform. https://www.bjets.com.cn/

  28. [36]

    J., Tipton, E

    Bryan, C. J., Tipton, E. & Yeager, D. S. Behavioural science is unlikely to change the world without a heterogeneity revolution. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5, 980–989 (2021)

    2021

  29. [37]

    G., Soman, D

    Szaszi, B., Goldstein, D. G., Soman, D. & Michie, S. Generalizability of choice architecture interventions. Nat. Rev. Psychol. 4, 518–529 (2025)

    2025

  30. [38]

    Wang, Z. et al. Incentive based emergency demand response effectively reduces peak load during heatwave without harm to vulnerable groups. Nat. Commun. 14, 6202 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Yen, B. T. H., Mulley, C. & Burke, M. Gamification in transport interventions: Another way to improve travel behavioural change. Cities 85, 140–149 (2019)

    2019

  32. [40]

    Herberz, M., Hahnel, U. J. J. & Brosch, T. Counteracting electric vehicle range concern with a scalable behavioural intervention. Nat. Energy 7, 503–510 (2022)

    2022

  33. [41]

    Cairns, S. et al. Smarter choices: Assessing the potential to achieve traffic reduction using ‘Soft measures’. Transp. Rev. 28, 593–618 (2008)

    2008

  34. [42]

    & Tan, E

    He, G., Pan, Y., Park, A., Sawada, Y. & Tan, E. S. Reducing single-use cutlery with green nudges: Evidence from China’s food-delivery industry. Science (80-. ). 381, (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    Walton, G. M. et al. Where and with whom does a brief social-belonging intervention promote progress in college? Science (80-. ). 380, 499–505 (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    & Shanmugan, S

    Pritschet, L., Beydler, E. & Shanmugan, S. Toward personalized clinical interventions for perinatal depression: Leveraging precision functional mapping. Sci. Adv. 11, (2025)

    2025

  37. [45]

    Byars-Winston, A. et al. A randomized controlled trial of an intervention to increase cultural diversity awareness of research mentors of undergraduate students. Sci. Adv. 9, (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    Hall, J. D. & Madsen, J. M. Can behavioral interventions be too salient? Evidence from traffic safety messages. Science (80-. ). 376, (2022)

    2022

  39. [47]

    Saag, L. et al. North Pontic crossroads: Mobility in Ukraine from the Bronze Age to the early modern period. Sci. Adv. 11, 695 (2025)

    2025

  40. [48]

    & Hedströ m, P

    Arvidsson, M., Collet, F. & Hedströ m, P. The Trojan-horse mechanism: How networks reduce gender segregation. Sci. Adv. 7, 6730–6746 (2021)

    2021

  41. [49]

    & Arribas-Bel, D

    Fleischmann, M. & Arribas-Bel, D. Geographical characterisation of British urban form and function using the spatial signatures framework. Sci. Data 9, 1–15 (2022). Acknowledgements This work is supported by Beijing Natural Science Foundation (No. JQ24051), and the European Re...

    2022

  42. [2031]

    Global Mobility As A Service Market https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/reports/global-mobility-as-a-service-market (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.