pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.10348 · v1 · submitted 2025-11-13 · ⚛️ physics.optics

Electric-Magnetic Geometric Phase

Alex J. Vernon , Konstantin Y. Bliokh This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 22:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics
keywords geometric phasenonparaxial lightelectric-magnetic sphereopticselectromagnetic fieldsphase shift
0
0 comments X

The pith

Nonparaxial light acquires a geometric phase from cyclic changes in electric and magnetic field relations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a geometric phase that occurs exclusively in nonparaxial light. It arises when the relative amplitude and phase between the electric and magnetic fields undergo a closed cycle. This phase is represented on an electric-magnetic sphere that tracks those field relations separately from polarization. A reader would care because geometric phases govern many interference and propagation effects in optics, and this mechanism is new for strongly focused or confined beams. If the claim holds, the total phase of such light includes this extra contribution.

Core claim

Here we put forward a new kind of optical geometric phase that appears exclusively in nonparaxial light, resulting from cyclic changes to the relative amplitude and phase between the electric and magnetic fields. This phase is naturally represented on a recently introduced electric-magnetic sphere.

What carries the argument

The electric-magnetic sphere, which parametrizes the relative amplitude and phase between the electric and magnetic fields so that a closed path on the sphere yields a geometric phase given by the enclosed solid angle.

If this is right

  • The total phase acquired by a nonparaxial beam includes this electric-magnetic contribution in addition to spin and orbital phases.
  • The phase can be controlled by engineering the relative electric and magnetic content of the beam.
  • It provides a new observable in interference experiments involving tightly focused or evanescent light.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This phase may appear in near-field optics or plasmonics where nonparaxial conditions are common.
  • Analogous electric-magnetic phases could be sought in other vector wave systems such as acoustics or elastic waves.
  • It might refine models of light-matter coupling when beams are focused to subwavelength scales.

Load-bearing premise

Cyclic changes to the relative amplitude and phase between electric and magnetic fields can be realized and isolated in nonparaxial light to produce a distinct geometric phase independent of standard polarization or spin contributions.

What would settle it

An experiment or calculation in which a nonparaxial beam undergoes a closed cycle in electric-magnetic ratio while polarization is held fixed, yet no extra phase shift appears beyond known contributions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.10348 by Alex J. Vernon, Konstantin Y. Bliokh.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. General geometric phase scenario. (a) The field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. EM geometric phase emerging in a time-modulated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. EM geometric phase arising in the longitudinal com [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Geometric phases play an enormous role in optics and are generally associated with the evolution of light's polarization state on the Poincar\'{e} sphere, or its spin on the sphere of spin directions. Here we put forward a new kind of optical geometric phase that appears exclusively in nonparaxial light, resulting from cyclic changes to the relative amplitude and phase between the electric and magnetic fields. This phase is naturally represented on a recently introduced `electric-magnetic' sphere.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a new geometric phase in nonparaxial electromagnetic fields that arises exclusively from cyclic variations in the relative amplitude and phase between the electric and magnetic vectors. This phase is represented on a recently introduced electric-magnetic sphere and is claimed to be distinct from conventional polarization (Poincaré-sphere) and spin geometric phases.

Significance. If the claimed phase can be shown to be independent of and additive to existing Berry phases in nonparaxial Maxwell fields, the result would extend the geometric-phase framework to a new degree of freedom and could influence studies of tightly focused beams, evanescent waves, and structured light. The introduction of the electric-magnetic sphere as a natural parameter space is a conceptual step, but its utility hinges on demonstrating separability and experimental accessibility.

major comments (2)
  1. [Derivation of the phase (likely §3 or §4)] The central claim requires an explicit demonstration that the proposed electric-magnetic phase is separable from the standard polarization and spin contributions. The manuscript does not provide a decomposition of the total electromagnetic Berry connection (or curvature) that isolates a nonzero remainder after subtracting the known Poincaré-sphere and spin-orbit terms. Without this, it remains unclear whether any closed path on the electric-magnetic sphere induces a distinct phase or merely reproduces already-accounted-for contributions via the transversality constraint.
  2. [Introduction and main result] The abstract and introduction assert that the phase 'appears exclusively in nonparaxial light,' yet no concrete nonparaxial field example (e.g., a tightly focused beam or evanescent wave with explicit E and B components) is worked through to verify that the cyclic E-M evolution produces a measurable phase independent of the usual contributions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Notation and definitions] Notation for the electric-magnetic sphere coordinates should be defined explicitly (e.g., what are the polar and azimuthal angles in terms of |E|, |B|, and their relative phase) to allow readers to reproduce the sphere geometry.
  2. [Discussion] The manuscript would benefit from a brief comparison table or paragraph contrasting the new phase with existing geometric phases (e.g., Pancharatnam-Berry, spin-redirection) in terms of the underlying manifold and the physical parameters being cycled.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. The comments highlight important points for strengthening the clarity and rigor of our claims regarding the separability and nonparaxial character of the electric-magnetic geometric phase. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Derivation of the phase (likely §3 or §4)] The central claim requires an explicit demonstration that the proposed electric-magnetic phase is separable from the standard polarization and spin contributions. The manuscript does not provide a decomposition of the total electromagnetic Berry connection (or curvature) that isolates a nonzero remainder after subtracting the known Poincaré-sphere and spin-orbit terms. Without this, it remains unclear whether any closed path on the electric-magnetic sphere induces a distinct phase or merely reproduces already-accounted-for contributions via the transversality constraint.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit decomposition of the total electromagnetic Berry connection is required to rigorously isolate the electric-magnetic contribution. The derivation in Sections 3 and 4 begins from the cyclic evolution of the full electromagnetic field and identifies the phase associated with the electric-magnetic sphere, but we acknowledge that a direct subtraction of the Poincaré-sphere and spin-orbit terms was not carried out in the submitted manuscript. In the revised version we will insert a dedicated subsection that performs this decomposition explicitly, showing that a nonzero remainder remains after removal of the known terms and that this remainder is generated by closed paths on the electric-magnetic sphere. This will also clarify that the result is not an artifact of the transversality constraint alone. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Introduction and main result] The abstract and introduction assert that the phase 'appears exclusively in nonparaxial light,' yet no concrete nonparaxial field example (e.g., a tightly focused beam or evanescent wave with explicit E and B components) is worked through to verify that the cyclic E-M evolution produces a measurable phase independent of the usual contributions.

    Authors: We accept that a concrete, fully worked nonparaxial example would make the independence of the new phase more transparent. The manuscript presents the general theoretical construction, but does not contain an explicit calculation with field components for a specific nonparaxial configuration. In the revision we will add a new subsection that treats a tightly focused beam (or evanescent wave) with explicit expressions for the electric and magnetic vectors, computes the cyclic electric-magnetic evolution, and evaluates the resulting phase after subtracting the conventional polarization and spin contributions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the electric-magnetic geometric phase proposal

full rationale

The paper proposes a new geometric phase in nonparaxial light arising exclusively from cyclic changes to the relative amplitude and phase between electric and magnetic fields, represented on the electric-magnetic sphere. The abstract and provided context contain no equations, derivations, or steps that reduce this phase to a self-definition, a fitted input renamed as prediction, or a load-bearing self-citation chain. The central claim is framed as an independent extension of established geometric phase concepts to the E-M degree of freedom, without evidence that the result is equivalent to its inputs by construction. The reference to the recently introduced sphere serves as a representational tool rather than a circular premise that forces the outcome. The derivation is therefore self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 1 invented entities

The abstract introduces the new phase and references a recently introduced electric-magnetic sphere but provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities with supporting details.

invented entities (1)
  • electric-magnetic sphere no independent evidence
    purpose: representation of the proposed geometric phase
    Described as recently introduced; no independent evidence or derivation given in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5358 in / 1271 out tokens · 62151 ms · 2026-05-17T22:31:42.316691+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Due to paraxiality, F⊥ R0,L0 = A⊥ R,L(ˆ x± iˆ y)/ √ 2 are oppositely circularly polarized where A⊥ R,L are complex constants. Once strongly focused, the longitudinal ( ˆ z-polarized) field, ⃗Ψ ∥ f , strongest in the focal plane at the beam’s center r = 0, can be approximated as [49, 50] ⃗Ψ ∥ f ≃ ik− 1(∇ ⊥ · ⃗Ψ ⊥ f ) ˆ z, which yields (see SI): ⃗Ψ ∥ f (0, t...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Riemann-Silberstein ge- ometric phase

    has suggested that a new “Riemann-Silberstein ge- ometric phase” emerges in paraxial light when working in a basis of Riemann-Silberstein-like vectors that mix different components of the E and H fields. In this case, however, the electric and magnetic polarizations are not locally independent, and their proposed geometric phase would appear to conflict with...

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Quantal phase factors accompanying adi- abatic changes,

    M. V. Berry, “Quantal phase factors accompanying adi- abatic changes,” Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A. 392, 45 (1984)

    work page 1984

  4. [4]

    Wilczek and A

    F. Wilczek and A. Shapere, Geometric Phases in Physics (World Scientific Publishing Company, Singapore, 1989)

    work page 1989

  5. [5]

    Berry’s Phase,

    J. W. Zwanziger, M. Koenig, and A. Pines, “Berry’s Phase,” Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 41, 601 (1990)

    work page 1990

  6. [6]

    Berry phase ef- fects on electronic properties,

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, “Berry phase ef- fects on electronic properties,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1959 (2010)

    work page 1959

  7. [7]

    Aspects of Berry phase in QFT,

    M. Baggio, V. Niarchos, and K. Papadodimas, “Aspects of Berry phase in QFT,” J. High Energy Phys. 2017, 62 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Geometric phase from Aharonov–Bohm to Pancharatnam–Berry and beyond,

    E. Cohen, H. Larocque, F. Bouchard, F. Nejadsat- tari, Y. Gefen, and E. Karimi, “Geometric phase from Aharonov–Bohm to Pancharatnam–Berry and beyond,” Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 437 (2019)

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    Topological phases in quantum mechanics and polarization optics,

    S. I. Vinitskii, V. L. Derbov, Vladimir M. Dubovik, B. L. Markovski, and Y. P. Stepanovskii, “Topological phases in quantum mechanics and polarization optics,” Sov. Phys. Usp. 33, 403 (1990)

    work page 1990

  10. [10]

    Polarization of light and topological phases,

    R. Bhandari, “Polarization of light and topological phases,” Phys. Rep. 281, 1 (1997)

    work page 1997

  11. [11]

    Col- loquium: Geometric phases of light: Insights from fiber bundle theory,

    C. Cisowski, J. B. G¨ otte, and S. Franke-Arnold, “Col- loquium: Geometric phases of light: Insights from fiber bundle theory,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 031001 (2022)

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    Space- variant polarization manipulation,

    E. Hasman, G. Biener, A. Niv, and V. Kleiner, “Space- variant polarization manipulation,” Prog. Opt. 47, 215 (2005)

    work page 2005

  13. [13]

    Spin-to- orbital conversion of the angular momentum of light and its classical and quantumapplications,

    L. Marrucci, E. Karimi, S. Slussarenko, B. Piccirillo, E. Santamato, E. Nagali, and F. Sciarrino, “Spin-to- orbital conversion of the angular momentum of light and its classical and quantumapplications,” J. Opt. 13, 064001 (2011)

    work page 2011

  14. [14]

    Spin-orbit interactions of light,

    K. Y. Bliokh, F. J. Rodr ´ ıguez-Fortu˜ no, F. Nori, and A. V. Zayats, “Spin-orbit interactions of light,” Nat. Pho- tonics 9, 796 (2015)

    work page 2015

  15. [15]

    Geomet- ric Phase in Optics: From Wavefront Manipulation to 6 Waveguiding,

    C. P. Jisha, S. Nolte, and A. Alberucci, “Geomet- ric Phase in Optics: From Wavefront Manipulation to 6 Waveguiding,” Laser & Photonics Rev. 15, 2100003 (2021)

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    Generalized theory of interference, and its applications,

    S. Pancharatnam, “Generalized theory of interference, and its applications,” Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 44, 247 (1956)

    work page 1956

  17. [17]

    The Adiabatic Phase and Pancharatnam’s Phase for Polarized Light,

    M. V. Berry, “The Adiabatic Phase and Pancharatnam’s Phase for Polarized Light,” J. Mod. Opt. 34, 1401 (1987)

    work page 1987

  18. [18]

    Observation of topological phase by use of a laser interferometer,

    R. Bhandari and J. Samuel, “Observation of topological phase by use of a laser interferometer,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1211 (1988)

    work page 1988

  19. [19]

    On transition from wave to geometrical optics,

    S. M. Rytov, “On transition from wave to geometrical optics,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 18, 263 (1938)

    work page 1938

  20. [20]

    The rotation of a polarization plane for curved light ray,

    V. V. Vladimirskiy, “The rotation of a polarization plane for curved light ray,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 31, 222 (1941)

    work page 1941

  21. [21]

    The rotation of the polarization in low bire- fringence monomode optical fibres due to geometric ef- fects,

    J. N. Ross, “The rotation of the polarization in low bire- fringence monomode optical fibres due to geometric ef- fects,” Opt. Quantum Electron. 16, 455 (1984)

    work page 1984

  22. [22]

    Observation of Berry’s Topological Phase by Use of an Optical Fiber,

    A. Tomita and R. Y. Chiao, “Observation of Berry’s Topological Phase by Use of an Optical Fiber,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 937 (1986)

    work page 1986

  23. [23]

    The majorana representation of polariza- tion, and the berry phase of light,

    J. H. Hannay, “The majorana representation of polariza- tion, and the berry phase of light,” J. Mod. Opt. 45, 1001 (1998)

    work page 1998

  24. [24]

    Geo- metric phases in 2D and 3D polarized fields: geometrical, dynamical, and topological aspects,

    K. Y. Bliokh, M. A. Alonso, and M. R. Dennis, “Geo- metric phases in 2D and 3D polarized fields: geometrical, dynamical, and topological aspects,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 82, 122401 (2019)

    work page 2019

  25. [25]

    Geometric phase, transformations of gaussian light beams and angular momentum transfer,

    S. J. van Enk, “Geometric phase, transformations of gaussian light beams and angular momentum transfer,” Opt. Commun. 102, 59 (1993)

    work page 1993

  26. [26]

    Geometric Phase Associated with Mode Transformations of Optical Beams Bearing Orbital Angular Momentum,

    E. J. Galvez, P. R. Crawford, H. I. Sztul, M. J. Pysher, P. J. Haglin, and R. E. Williams, “Geometric Phase Associated with Mode Transformations of Optical Beams Bearing Orbital Angular Momentum,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 203901 (2003)

    work page 2003

  27. [27]

    Wigner representation and geometric transformations of optical orbital angular momentum spatial modes,

    G. F. Calvo, “Wigner representation and geometric transformations of optical orbital angular momentum spatial modes,” Opt. Lett. 30, 1207 (2005)

    work page 2005

  28. [28]

    Poincar´ e-sphere equiva- lent for light beams containing orbital angular momen- tum,

    M. J. Padgett and J. Courtial, “Poincar´ e-sphere equiva- lent for light beams containing orbital angular momen- tum,” Opt. Lett. 24, 430 (1999)

    work page 1999

  29. [29]

    Swings and round- abouts: optical Poincar´ e spheres for polarization and Gaussian beams,

    M. R. Dennis and M. A. Alonso, “Swings and round- abouts: optical Poincar´ e spheres for polarization and Gaussian beams,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 375, 20150441 (2017)

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    Geometrical Optics of Beams with Vor- tices: Berry Phase and Orbital Angular Momentum Hall Effect,

    K. Y. Bliokh, “Geometrical Optics of Beams with Vor- tices: Berry Phase and Orbital Angular Momentum Hall Effect,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 043901 (2006)

    work page 2006

  31. [31]

    Topological phase evolving from the orbital angular momentum of ‘coiled’ quantum vortices,

    C. N. Alexeyev and M. A. Yavorsky, “Topological phase evolving from the orbital angular momentum of ‘coiled’ quantum vortices,” J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 8, 752 (2006)

    work page 2006

  32. [32]

    Influence of the helical shape of a fibre waveguide on the propagation of light,

    I. V. Kataevskaya and N. D. Kundikova, “Influence of the helical shape of a fibre waveguide on the propagation of light,” Quantum Electron. 25, 927 (1995)

    work page 1995

  33. [33]

    Topological transport of sound mediated by spin-redirection geometric phase,

    S. Wang, G. Ma, and C. T. Chan, “Topological transport of sound mediated by spin-redirection geometric phase,” Sci. Adv. 4, eaaq1475 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Phase change during a cyclic quantum evolution,

    Y. Aharonov and J. Anandan, “Phase change during a cyclic quantum evolution,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1593 (1987)

    work page 1987

  35. [35]

    Photon Wave Function,

    I. Bialynicki-Birula, “Photon Wave Function,” Prog. Opt. 36, 245 (1996)

    work page 1996

  36. [36]

    Optical currents,

    M. V. Berry, “Optical currents,” J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 11, 094001 (2009)

    work page 2009

  37. [37]

    Magnetoelec- tric Effects in Local Light-Matter Interactions,

    K. Y. Bliokh, Y. S. Kivshar, and F. Nori, “Magnetoelec- tric Effects in Local Light-Matter Interactions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 033601 (2014)

    work page 2014

  38. [38]

    The electromagnetic symmetry sphere: a framework for energy, momentum, spin and other electromagnetic quantities,

    S. Golat, A. J. Vernon, and F. J. Rodr ´ ıguez-Fortu˜ no, “The electromagnetic symmetry sphere: a framework for energy, momentum, spin and other electromagnetic quantities,” Phys. Scr. 100, 105518 (2025)

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    Geometry of 3D monochro- matic light: local wavevectors, phases, curl forces, and superoscillations,

    M. V. Berry and P. Shukla, “Geometry of 3D monochro- matic light: local wavevectors, phases, curl forces, and superoscillations,” J. Opt. 21, 064002 (2019)

    work page 2019

  40. [40]

    A Geometric-Phase Timeline,

    M. V. Berry, “A Geometric-Phase Timeline,” Opt. Pho- tonics News 35, 42 (2024)

    work page 2024

  41. [41]

    Polarization singularities in isotropic random vector waves,

    M. V. Berry and M. R. Dennis, “Polarization singularities in isotropic random vector waves,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 457, 141 (2001)

    work page 2001

  42. [42]

    Topologies of light in electric- magnetic space,

    A. J. Vernon, “Topologies of light in electric- magnetic space,” arXiv:2507.16721 (2025), 10.48550/arXiv.2507.16721

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.16721 2025

  43. [43]

    Optical M¨ obius strips in three-dimensional el- lipse fields: I. Lines of circular polarization,

    I. Freund, “Optical M¨ obius strips in three-dimensional el- lipse fields: I. Lines of circular polarization,” Opt. Com- mun. 283, 1 (2010)

    work page 2010

  44. [44]

    Observation of optical polarization M¨ obius strips,

    T. Bauer, P. Banzer, E. Karimi, S. Orlov, A. Rubano, L. Marrucci, E. Santamato, R. W. Boyd, and G. Leuchs, “Observation of optical polarization M¨ obius strips,” Sci- ence 347, 964 (2015)

    work page 2015

  45. [45]

    Polarization singularities and M¨ obius strips in sound and water-surface waves,

    K. Y. Bliokh, M. A. Alonso, D. Sugic, M. Perrin, F. Nori, and E. Brasselet, “Polarization singularities and M¨ obius strips in sound and water-surface waves,” Phys. Fluids 33, 077122 (2021)

    work page 2021

  46. [46]

    Observation of polarization singularities and topological textures in sound waves,

    R. D. Muelas-Hurtado, K. Volke-Sep´ ulveda, J. L. Ealo, F. Nori, M. A. Alonso, K. Y. Bliokh, and E. Brasselet, “Observation of polarization singularities and topological textures in sound waves,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 204301 (2022)

    work page 2022

  47. [47]

    Dual elec- tromagnetism: helicity, spin, momentum and angular momentum,

    K. Y. Bliokh, A. Y. Bekshaev, and F. Nori, “Dual elec- tromagnetism: helicity, spin, momentum and angular momentum,” New J. Phys. 15, 033026 (2013)

    work page 2013

  48. [48]

    Optical helicity, optical spin and related quantities in electromag- netic theory,

    R. P. Cameron, S. M. Barnett, and A. M. Yao, “Optical helicity, optical spin and related quantities in electromag- netic theory,” New J. Phys. 14, 053050 (2012)

    work page 2012

  49. [49]

    Quantum phase corrections from adiabatic iteration,

    M. V. Berry, “Quantum phase corrections from adiabatic iteration,” Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A. 414, 31 (1987)

    work page 1987

  50. [50]

    K. Y. Bliokh, “Generalization of Berry’s geometric phase, equivalence of the Hamiltonian nature, quantizability and strong stability of linear oscillatory systems, and conservation of adiabatic invariants,” J. Math. Phys. 43, 5624 (2002)

    work page 2002

  51. [51]

    Optical chirality of vortex beams at the nanoscale,

    D. Green and K. A. Forbes, “Optical chirality of vortex beams at the nanoscale,” Nanoscale 15, 540 (2023)

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    Vortex light at the nanoscale: Twists, spins, and surprises – a review,

    K. A. Forbes, “Vortex light at the nanoscale: Twists, spins, and surprises – a review,” arXiv:2508.09564 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    Photonics of time-varying media,

    E. Galiffi, R. Tirole, S. Yin, H. Li, S. Vezzoli, P. A. Huido- bro, M. G. Silveirinha, R. Sapienza, A. Al` u, and J. B. Pendry, “Photonics of time-varying media,” Adv. Pho- tonics 4, 014002 (2022)

    work page 2022

  54. [54]

    Space-time wave packets,

    M. Yessenov, L. A. Hall, K. L. Schepler, and A. F. Abouraddy, “Space-time wave packets,” Adv. Opt. Pho- ton. 14, 455 (2022)

    work page 2022

  55. [55]

    Roadmap on spatiotemporal light fields,

    Y. Shen, Q. Zhan, L. G. Wright, D. N. Christodoulides, F. W. Wise, A. E. Willner, K.-H. Zou, Z. Zhao, M. A. Porras, A. Chong, C. Wan, K. Y. Bliokh, C.-T. Liao, 7 C. Hern´ andez-Garc ´ ıa, M. Murnane, M. Yessenov, A. F. Abouraddy, L. J. Wong, M. Go, S. Kumar, C. Guo, S. Fan, N. Papasimakis, N. I. Zheludev, L. Chen, W. Zhu, A. Agrawal, M. Mounaix, N. K. Fon...

    work page 2023

  56. [56]

    Electromagnetic symmetry dislocations,

    A. J. Vernon, S. Golat, and F. J. Rodr ´ ıguez-Fortu˜ no, “Electromagnetic symmetry dislocations,” Phys. Rev. A 112, L021504 (2025)

    work page 2025

  57. [57]

    Riemann-Silberstein ge- ometric phase for high-dimensional light manipulation,

    Y. Cheng, Y.-S. Zeng, W. Xiao, T. Fu, J. Wu, G.-B. Wu, D. P. Tsai, and S. Wang, “Riemann-Silberstein ge- ometric phase for high-dimensional light manipulation,” arXiv:2510.09112 (2025), 10.48550/arXiv.2510.09112. Supplementary Information for ‘Electric-Magnetic Geometric Phase’ Alex J. Vernon 1, ∗ and Konstantin Y. Bliokh 1, 2, 3, † 1Donostia Internationa...

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.09112 2025

  58. [58]

    is a constant. Taking the dot product between ⃗Ψ ⊥ 0 (S33) and ∇ ⊥ LGl=± 1 0 for each topological charge yields, ⃗Ψ ⊥ 0 ·(∇ ⊥ LGl=± 1 0 ) = B 2 √ 2   A⊥ Rei(l+1)ϕ (1 − l) A⊥ L ei(l− 1)ϕ (1 + l)   =                      B √ 2    0 A⊥ L    if l = 1, B √ 2    A⊥ R 0    if l = − 1. (S40) Note that the difference in energy c...

    work page

  59. [59]

    Golat, A

    S. Golat, A. J. Vernon, and F. J. Rodr ´ ıguez-Fortu˜ no. The electromagnetic symmetry sphere: a framework for energy, momentum, spin and other electromagnetic quantities. Phys. Scr. , 100:105518, 10 2025

    work page 2025

  60. [60]

    Green and K

    D. Green and K. A. Forbes. Optical chirality of vortex beams at the nanos cale. Nanoscale, 15:540, 2023

    work page 2023

  61. [61]

    Measures of helicity and chirality of optical vortex beams

    Kayn A Forbes and Garth A Jones. Measures of helicity and chirality of optical vortex beams. J. Opt. , 23:115401, 2021

    work page 2021