Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 72 references

Hybrid Si-GST Polarization-Insensitive Dynamically Tunable Bifocal Metalens Operating at 1.55-$\mu$m Wavelength

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single flat lens uses laser-switched GST nanopillars to flip its focal length between 70 and 200 micrometers at 1.55-μm wavelength, staying polarization-insensitive, according to FDTD and thermal simulations.

desk verdict The full-lens results are 2D FDTD, so the central claims about a 3D polarization-insensitive bifocal metalens aren't actually validated; the design concept is still worth a critical look. read the letter →

arxiv 2511.21138 v2 pith:GUSG4UIL submitted 2025-11-26 physics.optics

Dipika Rani Nath , Sadid Muneer , Sajid Muhaimin Choudhury This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords metalensphase-changematerialGST(Ge2Sb2Te5)varifocalpolarization-insensitiveall-opticalswitchingFDTDsimulation1.55μmtelecommunicationwavelength
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper designs an all-dielectric metalens made of silicon and the phase-change material Ge₂Sb₂Te₅ (GST) that can switch its focal length from roughly 70 μm to 200 μm by changing the GST between its amorphous and crystalline states. The two states are triggered by flat-top laser pulses: a short intense pulse melts and quenches the GST into the amorphous state, while a longer moderate pulse crystallizes it. The device is built from two concentric regions—an outer ring of pure GST nanopillars that focuses when amorphous, and an inner disk of hybrid Si–GST pillars that focuses when crystalline. The paper claims focusing efficiencies of 30% and 20% and near-diffraction-limited spots, with switching times of about 13 ns for amorphization and 90 ns for crystallization. If correct, this would give a compact, nonvolatile, all-optical varifocal lens for telecom wavelengths without moving parts or electrical bias.

What carries the argument

The key mechanism is the reversible amorphous-to-crystalline phase transition of GST, which changes its refractive index from n ≈ 2.4 to n ≈ 5.2 at 1.55 μm. The design uses two types of rotationally symmetric nanopillars (pure GST and hybrid Si–GST) whose diameters are tuned to give the needed local phase delay. Because the pillars are circular in cross-section, the device is claimed to be insensitive to linear and circular polarization. The dual-focal behavior comes from the complementary phase-matching of the two concentric zones, with the outer zone active only in the amorphous state and the inner zone active only in the crystalline state.

What would settle it

Run a full 3D FDTD simulation of the designed metalens with cylindrical pillars (using the provided radii tables) and compare the focal positions, FWHM, and focusing efficiencies for both GST states and for both linearly and circularly polarized light. If the focal lengths deviate significantly from 74 μm and 204 μm, or if the polarization response becomes asymmetric, the central claim is falsified. Alternatively, fabricate the lens and measure the focus for both programmed states.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a polarization-insensitive, dynamically tunable bifocal metalens can be realized at 1.55 μm by combining two concentric metasurface regions whose phase profiles activate in opposite GST states. Region 2 (outer ring, GST-only nanopillars) satisfies the hyperboloidal phase condition for f₂ = 200 μm when GST is amorphous; Region 1 (inner disk, hybrid GST–Si pillars) satisfies the phase condition for f₁ = 70 μm when GST is crystalline. Because the two regions are complementary, the lens toggles between two distinct foci without mechanical motion. Unit-cell FDTD scans show full 0–2π phase coverage with about 85% transmission for the amorphous GST pillar and slightly lowe

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the 2D FDTD simulation of the full lens, which models the nanostructures as infinite ridges, accurately predicts the performance of the actual 3D metasurface made of discrete cylindrical pillars, including the focusing efficiencies and polarization independence.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the design works as simulated, a single passive lens could serve as a varifocal element in telecom systems, switching focus in tens of nanoseconds without electrical contacts.
  • The flat-top laser scheme could be extended to other phase-change metasurfaces to achieve uniform switching across large apertures, reducing thermal damage and improving repeatability.
  • The polarization-insensitive geometry means the metalens can work with arbitrary polarization states, including circularly polarized light, which is important for integrated photonic circuits.
  • Near-diffraction-limited FWHM values (1.74 μm and around 2.1 μm for the two states) suggest the lens can focus light to the theoretical limit, making it suitable for high-resolution imaging or optical trapping.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The full-lens intensity simulations (Figs. 5 and 6) are explicitly 2D FDTD, treating the nanostructures as infinite ridges rather than finite cylindrical pillars; the claimed focusing efficiencies and polarization insensitivity for a 3D metalens therefore rest on a dimensional reduction that the paper does not justify. A 3D simulation or experiment with the actual pillars could give different foca
  • The switching times and energy densities are derived from COMSOL thermal simulations of single nanopillars with a 300-nm spot; scaling to the full lens (millimeter-scale) would require a very large flat-top beam or a different addressing scheme, which the paper does not address.
  • The design principle of complementary phase-matching zones could be extended to more than two focal lengths by adding additional annular zones with different GST state sensitivities, although phase interference between zones would need careful management.
  • If experimentally realized, the metalens could enable depth-selective imaging in optical coherence tomography or LiDAR by rapidly toggling between two focal planes, but the need for a high-power pulsed laser and thermal management would be practical hurdles not covered here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an all-dielectric varifocal metalens at 1.55 µm composed of two concentric regions: GST-only nanopillars for a 200-µm focal length in the amorphous state and hybrid GST–Si nanopillars for a 70-µm focal length in the crystalline state. The authors use 3D FDTD to design the unit cells, 2D FDTD to generate the full-lens focal patterns, and COMSOL to model flat-top-laser-induced phase transitions. They report near-diffraction-limited spots with 20–30% focusing efficiency and polarization-insensitive operation, with switching times of 13–90 ns.

Significance. The design concept is plausible and the unit-cell 3D FDTD work is systematic. If fully validated, the metalens would be a useful contribution to reconfigurable flat optics, especially the all-optical nonvolatile switching and polarization insensitivity. However, the central validation currently rests on 2D FDTD for the full lens, which cannot represent the designed 3D pillars or simulate circular polarization, and the nanosecond switching times are an input to the thermal model rather than a predicted outcome. The paper therefore needs substantial additional simulation evidence before the headline claims can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.2, Figs. 5–6] The full-lens validation is performed with a two-dimensional FDTD simulation (explicitly stated in §4.2): an x-polarized plane wave propagates along +y, a 1D monitor is placed above the 'nanopillar array' and projected along +x. In 2D Cartesian FDTD, the meta-atoms are infinite ridges invariant along the third dimension; they are not the finite cylindrical GST and GST–Si pillars listed in Tables 4/5. The focal positions (204/74 µm), FWHMs (≈1.73–2.08 µm), and efficiencies (20–30%) are therefore predictions for a 1D lens, not for the 3D design. Moreover, LCP illumination cannot even be represented in this 2D setup, so Fig. 6 does not support the polarization-insensitivity claim. The paper must either provide full 3D simulations of the actual lens or explicitly reframe the claims to a 2D slab geometry.
  2. [§4.3, Figs. 7–8] The switching times are imposed rather than predicted. Crystallization is simulated by applying a 10 mW, 90 ns pulse and amorphization by a 90 mW, 13 ns pulse; the temperature plots only show that T_g or T_m is exceeded. No crystallization kinetics (e.g., JMAK equation), no melt-depth criterion, and no phase-fraction evolution are used to establish that the transition completes at 90 ns and 13 ns. The claim that 'amorphous GST requires approximately 90 ns to achieve complete crystallization' is therefore circular, and the corresponding 10 MHz switching-frequency estimate is unsupported. The abstract's inconsistency (≈8 ns vs 13 ns amorphization) compounds the problem.
  3. [§4.3 and Supplementary S6] The thermal simulations are performed on an isolated nanopillar (radius 250 nm) heated by a 300-nm flat-top spot, not on the full 55-µm-radius metalens or a representative multi-pillar array. The claim of uniform and reversible phase transitions across the entire device therefore lacks numerical support; switching a large-area lens would require a large flat-top beam or raster scanning, which is not analyzed. The optical–thermal model should at least include near-neighbor pillars and discuss the beam-size scaling.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract/§4.3] Amorphization time is given as ≈8 ns in the abstract and 13 ns in the body; please harmonize.
  2. [Fig. 4 caption] The caption uses 'f1=70 m' and 'f2=200 m'; these should be µm.
  3. [§4.1 vs §4.2] Coordinate conventions are inconsistent: §4.1 uses propagation along +z, while §4.2 uses propagation along +y. Please use a single convention throughout.
  4. [Tables 4/5] Tables 4 and 5 include radii as high as 296.64/299.84 nm at a period of 600 nm, leaving gaps <7 nm and <0.4 nm. This near-touching geometry is likely to produce strong inter-pillar coupling and is not robust to fabrication tolerances; the assumption of independent unit cells should be checked.
  5. [§4.2, efficiency definition] The 'focusing efficiency' definition (power within a radius of 3×FWHM) needs to be stated in a way that is meaningful for a 2D simulation; in 2D the integrated 'radius' is not the same as the 3D aperture used in the claim.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The lens design is a genuine forward simulation, but the claimed 13/90 ns switching times are the input laser pulse durations renamed as results.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 4.3, 'Laser-Induced Phase Transition in GST-Based Meta-Atoms' (Figs. 7–8); also Abstract and Table 2; kinetic input fixed in Supplement S6]
    "During crystallization, the GST nanopillars of both types with a radius of 250 nm are gradually heated to near their crystallization temperature (Tg) using a 10 mW, 90 ns laser pulse, as illustrated in Figs. 7a and 7b. For amorphization, a 90 mW, 13 ns pulse momentarily elevates the temperature above the melting point (Tm) before rapid cooling restores the amorphous phase ... As observed in Fig. 7, the amorphous GST requires approximately 90 ns to achieve complete crystallization, implying a maximum theoretical switching frequency of about 10 MHz."

    The transient thermal model (Supplement Eqs. E1–E11) only solves heat diffusion with a super-Gaussian source; it does not simulate crystallization or amorphization kinetics. The 90 ns and 13 ns durations are already the laser pulse widths chosen as excitation inputs (S6: 'f(t) is modeled as a square pulse with a duration of 13 ns for amorphization and 90 ns for crystallization'). The paper then reports those same input durations as the material's required switching times ('requires approximately 90 ns to achieve complete crystallization') and lists them as '13–90 ns' in Table 2. Thus the claimed switching time is the input pulse duration by construction, not an emergent prediction. The abstract's '~8 ns' vs. the text's '13 ns' for amorphization further indicates the number is a chosen para

full rationale

The core varifocal-lens derivation is not circular: the hyperboloidal phase profile (Eq. 2) prescribes f1 = 70 µm and f2 = 200 µm, but the full-lens FDTD calculation is a genuine forward simulation that produces foci at 74 µm and 204 µm with nonzero phase-discretization error, quantifying efficiency, FWHM, and focal shifts. That is independent content, not a tautology. No load-bearing self-citation or imported uniqueness theorem is present; the material data and GST parameters come from external experimental datasets. The serious 2D-FDTD issue in Section 4.2 ('obtained using a two-dimensional finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulation') is a validation gap, not a circularity: a 2D ridge simulation cannot represent the designed 3D cylindrical pillars or simulate LCP illumination, so the claimed polarization-insensitive 3D focusing is not established. The only step that reduces to its own input by construction is the thermal switching-time claim: the simulated pulse durations are chosen to reach Tg/Tm and then reported as the measured switching times.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central lens claim rests on three key external or assumed inputs: the GST optical constants from a single reference, the thermal-threshold model for phase transitions, and the questionable 2D full-lens simulation. These are not free parameters in the fitting sense, but they are load-bearing assumptions the reader must accept.

free parameters (2)
  • Nanopillar geometry (P=600 nm, H1=1400 nm, H2=267 nm, H3=533 nm) = P=600, H1=1400, H2=267, H3=533 nm
    Chosen via parametric FDTD sweeps to achieve 0–2π phase coverage with acceptable transmission; the device's focusing relies on these exact heights.
  • Laser switching parameters (power and duration; super-Gaussian order; spot size) = 10 mW/90 ns (crystallization), 90 mW/13 ns (amorphization), n≈20, w0=300 nm
    Chosen so that simulated temperature reaches Tg or Tm; these inputs are then reported as the device's switching times.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption GST optical constants at 1550 nm from ref [38] (a-GST n=2.4/k=0.02, c-GST n=5.2/k=0.1) are accurate for the proposed structures.
    The design and efficiency claims are highly sensitive to these values; the paper does not independently validate them, and the low c-GST extinction coefficient is favorable to the claimed transmission.
  • domain assumption A single flat-top pulse that heats GST above Tg (crystallization) or above Tm followed by quenching (amorphization) causes complete, uniform phase change throughout the nanopillar.
    The COMSOL model solves heat diffusion and uses a melting phase-change module for amorphization, but it does not simulate nucleation/growth kinetics; complete crystallization in 90 ns is assumed rather than derived.
  • ad hoc to paper A 2D FDTD simulation with the structure invariant along one axis is an adequate model for the 3D cylindrical-pillar metalens.
    Section 4.2 explicitly states the full-lens results were obtained with two-dimensional FDTD; this is not a standard way to simulate a rotationally symmetric metalens of finite pillars and is not justified in the paper.
  • domain assumption The inactive region in each phase state does not significantly affect the focal spot.
    The design assumes that in the amorphous state the inner hybrid region is 'optically inactive' and in the crystalline state the outer GST-only region is inactive; the full-lens (2D) simulation is claimed to support this, but no separate analysis isolates the inactive region's contribution.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Hybrid Si-GST Polarization-Insensitive Dynamically Tunable Bifocal Metalens Operating at 1.55-$\mu$m Wavelength." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GUSG4UIL

@misc{pith2026251121138,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Hybrid Si-GST Polarization-Insensitive Dynamically Tunable Bifocal Metalens Operating at 1.55-$\mu$m Wavelength},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GUSG4UIL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.21138}
}
abstract

Metasurfaces have become a cornerstone of flat-optics, enabling precise control over light propagation through nanoengineered materials. Dynamic and reconfigurable metalenses are key to next-generation flat-optics platforms, yet their practical realization remains limited by slow response, optical loss, and polarization sensitivity. The integration of chalcogenide phase-change materials with metasurface architectures offers a powerful platform for dynamic optical tunability, owing to materials such as Ge$_2$Sb$_2$Te$_5$ (GST) that can be reversibly switched between amorphous and crystalline states with distinct refractive indices. However, the strong optical absorption of crystalline GST in the visible to near-infrared range has hindered its widespread use in reconfigurable metalenses. In this study, we design an all-dielectric polarization-insensitive metasurface based on hybrid Si-GST nanostructures to realize a dynamically tunable bifocal metalens operating at 1.55 \textmu m. The device achieves a variable focal length from 70 \textmu m to 200 \textmu m, with focusing efficiencies of 30\% in the amorphous state and 20\% in the crystalline state, as validated through finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulations. Using COMSOL Multiphysics, we show that flat-top laser excitation enables uniform, reversible phase transitions within tens of nanoseconds, amorphization in ~8 ns and crystallization in ~90 ns, without mechanical motion or electrical bias. For next-generation metasurfaces intended for uses including beam steering, dynamic holography, optical routing, multi-depth imaging, and optical communication, this method shows great promise due to its control and stability.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.21138 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic of the proposed varifocal metalens. (a) Cross-sectional view of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the all-optical switching mechanism in the proposed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Simulated transmittance and phase response of the metasurface unit cells as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Numerical results of the dual-focal metasurface lens. (a) Target continuous [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Normalized electric-field intensity profiles along the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Simulated focusing performance of the proposed metalens under different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Simulated average temperature evolution of nanopillars under laser excitation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Simulated temperature distribution in GST nanopillars during laser excitation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Wavelength-dependent refractive index (𝑛) and extinction coefficient (𝑘) of amorphous and crystalline GST [63] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (a–c) Simulated schematic, transmittance, and phase response of the all-GST [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Comparison between the simulated and target phase distributions of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Fabrication process of the all-GST metasurface region. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Fabrication process of the hybrid GST–Si metasurface region. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_13.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Lidar and beam steering tailored by neuromorphic metasurfaces dipped in a tunable surrounding medium,

    G. E. Lio and A. Ferraro, “Lidar and beam steering tailored by neuromorphic metasurfaces dipped in a tunable surrounding medium,” inPhotonics,vol. 8 (MDPI, 2021), p. 65

    2021

  2. [2]

    Flat optics with designer metasurfaces,

    N. Yu and F. Capasso, “Flat optics with designer metasurfaces,” Nature Materials13, 139–150 (2014)

    2014

  3. [3]

    All-dielectric metamaterials,

    S. Jahani and Z. Jacob, “All-dielectric metamaterials,” Nature Nanotechnology11, 23–36 (2016)

    2016

  4. [4]

    Multicolor 3d meta-holography by broadband plasmonic modulation,

    X. Liet al., “Multicolor 3d meta-holography by broadband plasmonic modulation,” Science Advances2, e1601102 (2016)

    2016

  5. [5]

    Metasurface holograms reaching 80% efficiency,

    G. Zhenget al., “Metasurface holograms reaching 80% efficiency,” Nature Nanotechnology10, 308–312 (2015)

    2015

  6. [6]

    Tunable graphene metasurface reflectarray for cloaking, illusion, and focusing,

    S. R. Biswas, C. E. Gutiérrez, A. Nemilentsau,et al., “Tunable graphene metasurface reflectarray for cloaking, illusion, and focusing,” Phys. Rev. Appl.9, 034021 (2018)

    2018

  7. [7]

    Reconfigurable metasurface cloak for dynamical electromagnetic illusions,

    C. Huang, J. Yang, X. Wu,et al., “Reconfigurable metasurface cloak for dynamical electromagnetic illusions,” Acs Photonics5, 1718–1725 (2017)

    2017

  8. [8]

    Helicity dependent directional surface plasmon polariton excitation using a metasurface with interfacial phase discontinuity,

    L. Huang, X. Chen, B. Bai,et al., “Helicity dependent directional surface plasmon polariton excitation using a metasurface with interfacial phase discontinuity,” Light: Science & Applications2, e70–e70 (2013)

    2013

Show all 72 references
  1. [9]

    All-dielectric metasurfaces for polarization manipulation: principles and emerging applications,

    Y. Hu, X. Wang, X. Luo,et al., “All-dielectric metasurfaces for polarization manipulation: principles and emerging applications,” Nanophotonics9, 3755–3780 (2020)

    2020

  2. [10]

    Photonic spin hall effect at metasurfaces,

    X. Yin, Z. Ye, J. Rho,et al., “Photonic spin hall effect at metasurfaces,” Science339, 1405–1407 (2013)

    2013

  3. [11]

    Multidimensionalmanipulationofphotonicspinhalleffectwithasingle-layerdielectric metasurface,

    S.Li,X.Li,G.Wang,etal.,“Multidimensionalmanipulationofphotonicspinhalleffectwithasingle-layerdielectric metasurface,” Advanced Optical Materials7, 1801365 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    Metalenses: Versatile multifunctional photonic components,

    M. Khorasaninejad and F. Capasso, “Metalenses: Versatile multifunctional photonic components,” Science358, eaam8100 (2017)

    2017

  5. [13]

    Metalenses: advances and applications,

    M. L. Tseng, H.-H. Hsiao, C. H. Chu,et al., “Metalenses: advances and applications,” Advanced Optical Materials6, 1800554 (2018)

    2018

  6. [14]

    Dielectric metasurfaces for complete control of phase, amplitude, and polarization,

    T. Wu, X. Zhang, Q. Xu,et al., “Dielectric metasurfaces for complete control of phase, amplitude, and polarization,” Advanced Optical Materials10, 2101223 (2022)

    2022

  7. [15]

    Metalensesatvisiblewavelengths: Diffraction-limitedfocusingandsubmicronresolution,

    M.Khorasaninejadetal.,“Metalensesatvisiblewavelengths: Diffraction-limitedfocusingandsubmicronresolution,” Science352, 1190–1194 (2016)

    2016

  8. [16]

    A broadband achromatic metalens for visible light,

    W. T. Chenet al., “A broadband achromatic metalens for visible light,” Nature Nanotechnology13, 220–226 (2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    A review on reconfigurable metalenses revolutionizing flat optics,

    S. N. Khonina, M. A. Butt, and N. L. Kazanskiy, “A review on reconfigurable metalenses revolutionizing flat optics,” Advanced Optical Materials12, 2302794 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    Active metamaterials and metadevices: a review,

    S. Xiao, T. Wang, T. Liu,et al., “Active metamaterials and metadevices: a review,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics53, 503002 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    Tunable metasurface and flat optical zoom lens on a stretchable substrate,

    H.-S. Ee and R. Agarwal, “Tunable metasurface and flat optical zoom lens on a stretchable substrate,” Nano letters 16, 2818–2823 (2016)

    2016

  12. [20]

    Electrically actuated varifocal lens based on liquid-crystal-embedded dielectric metasurfaces,

    M. Bosch, M. R. Shcherbakov, K. Won,et al., “Electrically actuated varifocal lens based on liquid-crystal-embedded dielectric metasurfaces,” Nano Letters21, 3849–3856 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    Graphene-based metasurface for tunable absorption and transmission characteristics in the near mid-infrared region,

    S. K. Ghosh, S. Das, and S. Bhattacharyya, “Graphene-based metasurface for tunable absorption and transmission characteristics in the near mid-infrared region,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation70, 4600–4612 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    Holographic optical metasurfaces: a review of current progress,

    P. Genevet and F. Capasso, “Holographic optical metasurfaces: a review of current progress,” Reports on Progress in Physics78, 024401 (2015)

    2015

  15. [23]

    Integrated all-photonic nonvolatile multi-level memory,

    C. Ríoset al., “Integrated all-photonic nonvolatile multi-level memory,” Nature Photonics9, 725–732 (2015)

    2015

  16. [24]

    Resonant bonding in crystalline phase-change materials,

    K. Shportkoet al., “Resonant bonding in crystalline phase-change materials,” Nature Materials7, 653–658 (2008)

    2008

  17. [25]

    Ultrafast optical manipulation of atomic arrangements in chalcogenide alloy memory materials,

    K. Makino, J. Tominaga, and M. Hase, “Ultrafast optical manipulation of atomic arrangements in chalcogenide alloy memory materials,” Optics express19, 1260–1270 (2011)

    2011

  18. [26]

    Large-angle mid-infrared absorption switch enabled by polarization-independent gst metasurfaces,

    M. Wei, Z. Song, Y. Deng,et al., “Large-angle mid-infrared absorption switch enabled by polarization-independent gst metasurfaces,” Materials Letters236, 350–353 (2019)

    2019

  19. [27]

    Active all-dielectric bifocal metalens assisted by germanium antimony telluride,

    S. Li, C. Zhou, G. Ban,et al., “Active all-dielectric bifocal metalens assisted by germanium antimony telluride,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics52, 095106 (2019)

    2019

  20. [28]

    Longitudinalmultifocimetalensforcircularlypolarizedlight,

    X.Chen,M.Chen,M.Q.Mehmood,etal.,“Longitudinalmultifocimetalensforcircularlypolarizedlight,”Advanced Optical Materials (2015)

    2015

  21. [29]

    Multispectral chiral imaging with a metalens,

    M. Khorasaninejad, W. Chen, A. Zhu,et al., “Multispectral chiral imaging with a metalens,” Nano letters16, 4595–4600 (2016)

    2016

  22. [30]

    Processing-based approach for resolving the sample optic axis in endoscopic polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography,

    D. C. Adams and M. J. Suter, “Processing-based approach for resolving the sample optic axis in endoscopic polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography,” Optics Express26, 24917–24927 (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    Flexible near-infrared diffuse optical tomography with varied weighting functions of edge-preserving regularization,

    L.-Y. Chen, M.-C. Pan, and M.-C. Pan, “Flexible near-infrared diffuse optical tomography with varied weighting functions of edge-preserving regularization,” Applied Optics52, 1173–1182 (2013)

    2013

  24. [32]

    Monatomic phase change memory,

    M. Salinga, B. Kersting, I. Ronneberger,et al., “Monatomic phase change memory,” Nature materials17, 681–685 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    Analysis of crosstalk-free conditions for a cross-shift multiplexing method in holographic data recording,

    S. Horiuchi, A. Fukumoto, and M. Yamamoto, “Analysis of crosstalk-free conditions for a cross-shift multiplexing method in holographic data recording,” Applied Optics57, 7805–7810 (2018)

    2018

  26. [34]

    Active multiband varifocal metalenses based on orbital angular momentum division multiplexing,

    R. Zheng, R. Pan, G. Geng,et al., “Active multiband varifocal metalenses based on orbital angular momentum division multiplexing,” Nature communications13, 4292 (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    Resolving stable axial trapping points of nanowires in an optical tweezers using photoluminescence mapping,

    F. Wang, W. J. Toe, W. M. Lee,et al., “Resolving stable axial trapping points of nanowires in an optical tweezers using photoluminescence mapping,” Nano letters13, 1185–1191 (2013)

    2013

  28. [36]

    A review of dielectric optical metasurfaces for wavefront control,

    S. M. Kamali, E. Arbabi, A. Arbabi, and A. Faraon, “A review of dielectric optical metasurfaces for wavefront control,” Nanophotonics7, 1041–1068 (2018)

    2018

  29. [37]

    E. D. Palik,Handbook of optical constants of solids, vol. 3 (Academic press, 1998)

    1998

  30. [39]

    Efficient silicon metasurfaces for visible light,

    Z. Zhou, J. Li, R. Su,et al., “Efficient silicon metasurfaces for visible light,” Acs Photonics4, 544–551 (2017)

    2017

  31. [40]

    Multiwavelength metasurfaces through spatial multiplexing,

    E. Arbabi, A. Arbabi, S. M. Kamali,et al., “Multiwavelength metasurfaces through spatial multiplexing,” Scientific reports6, 32803 (2016)

    2016

  32. [41]

    Broadbandall-dielectricmetasurfacewithhightransmissionefficiency,

    H.Qianetal.,“Broadbandall-dielectricmetasurfacewithhightransmissionefficiency,”ACSPhotonics7,2106–2114 (2020)

    2020

  33. [42]

    Achromatic and polarization-insensitive dielectric metalens for broadband imaging,

    L. Wanget al., “Achromatic and polarization-insensitive dielectric metalens for broadband imaging,” Advanced Photonics4, 056004 (2022)

    2022

  34. [43]

    Ultra-broadband high-efficiency dielectric metasurfaces with continuous phase control,

    H. Zhanget al., “Ultra-broadband high-efficiency dielectric metasurfaces with continuous phase control,” ACS Photonics9, 1570–1578 (2022)

    2022

  35. [44]

    Sharper focal spot for a radially polarized beam using ring aperture with phase jump,

    S. N. Khonina and A. V. Ustinov, “Sharper focal spot for a radially polarized beam using ring aperture with phase jump,” Journal of Engineering2013, 512971 (2013)

    2013

  36. [45]

    Reconfigurableall-dielectricmetalenswithdiffraction-limitedperformance,

    M.Y.Shalaginov,S.An,Y.Zhang,etal.,“Reconfigurableall-dielectricmetalenswithdiffraction-limitedperformance,” Nature communications12, 1225 (2021)

    2021

  37. [46]

    Highfocusingefficiencyinsubdiffractionfocusingmetalens,

    Z.-P.Zhuang,R.Chen,Z.-B.Fan,etal.,“Highfocusingefficiencyinsubdiffractionfocusingmetalens,”Nanophotonics 8, 1279–1289 (2019)

    2019

  38. [47]

    Dynamic dual-focus metasurfaces enabled by phase-change nanophotonics,

    J. Kimet al., “Dynamic dual-focus metasurfaces enabled by phase-change nanophotonics,” ACS Photonics10, 2854–2863 (2023)

    2023

  39. [48]

    Electromagneticdiffractioninopticalsystems,ii.structureoftheimagefieldinanaplanatic system,

    B.RichardsandE.Wolf,“Electromagneticdiffractioninopticalsystems,ii.structureoftheimagefieldinanaplanatic system,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences253, 358–379 (1959)

    1959

  40. [49]

    Varifocal metalens using tunable and ultralow-loss dielectrics,

    M. Wang, J. S. Lee, S. Aggarwal,et al., “Varifocal metalens using tunable and ultralow-loss dielectrics,” Advanced Science10, 2204899 (2023)

    2023

  41. [50]

    Beam switching and bifocal zoom lensing using active plasmonic metasurfaces,

    X. Yin, T. Steinle, L. Huang,et al., “Beam switching and bifocal zoom lensing using active plasmonic metasurfaces,” Light: Science & Applications6, e17016–e17016 (2017)

    2017

  42. [51]

    Enhancingfocusinganddefocusingcapabilitieswithadynamicallyreconfigurable metalens utilizing sb2se3 phase-change material,

    C.Shen,J.Ye,N.Peserico,etal.,“Enhancingfocusinganddefocusingcapabilitieswithadynamicallyreconfigurable metalens utilizing sb2se3 phase-change material,” Nanomaterials13, 2106 (2023)

    2023

  43. [52]

    Transient thermal modeling of laser-based additive manufacturing for 3d freeform structures,

    E. Kundakcioglu, I. Lazoglu, and S. Rawal, “Transient thermal modeling of laser-based additive manufacturing for 3d freeform structures,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology85, 493–501 (2016)

    2016

  44. [53]

    Propagationandfocusingofgaussianlaserbeamsbeyondconventionaldiffractionlimit,

    A.YoshidaandT.Asakura, “Propagationandfocusingofgaussianlaserbeamsbeyondconventionaldiffractionlimit,” Optics communications123, 694–704 (1996)

    1996

  45. [54]

    A new finite element model for welding heat sources,

    J. Goldak, A. Chakravarti, and M. Bibby, “A new finite element model for welding heat sources,” Metallurgical transactions B15, 299–305 (1984)

    1984

  46. [55]

    Paschottaet al.,Encyclopedia of laser physics and technology, vol

    R. Paschottaet al.,Encyclopedia of laser physics and technology, vol. 1 (Wiley Online Library, 2008)

    2008

  47. [56]

    Characterizing flat-top laser beams using standard beam parameters,

    S. Saghafi, M. Withford, and Z. Ghoranneviss, “Characterizing flat-top laser beams using standard beam parameters,” Canadian journal of physics84, 223–240 (2006)

    2006

  48. [57]

    Fast and uniform laser-induced switching in chalcogenide phase-change nanostructures,

    Y. Wanget al., “Fast and uniform laser-induced switching in chalcogenide phase-change nanostructures,” Advanced Optical Materials11, 2300035 (2023)

    2023

  49. [58]

    Characterization of supercooled liquid ge2sb2te5 and its crystallization by ultrafast-heating calorimetry,

    J. Orava, A. á. Greer, B. Gholipour,et al., “Characterization of supercooled liquid ge2sb2te5 and its crystallization by ultrafast-heating calorimetry,” Nature materials11, 279–283 (2012)

    2012

  50. [59]

    Ultrafast laser-induced phase change dynamics in gst with cellular automata model,

    L. Zhang, Y. Peng, and P. Cencillo-Abad, “Ultrafast laser-induced phase change dynamics in gst with cellular automata model,” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals200, 117093 (2025)

    2025

  51. [60]

    Thermo-mechanical model development and validation of directed energy deposition additive manufacturing of ti–6al–4v,

    J. Heigel, P. Michaleris, and E. W. Reutzel, “Thermo-mechanical model development and validation of directed energy deposition additive manufacturing of ti–6al–4v,” Additive manufacturing5, 9–19 (2015)

    2015

  52. [61]

    Simulation of laser heating of aluminum and model validation via two-color pyrometer and shape assessment,

    F. Caiazzo and V. Alfieri, “Simulation of laser heating of aluminum and model validation via two-color pyrometer and shape assessment,” Materials11, 1506 (2018)

    2018

  53. [62]

    Models for phase-change of ge 2 sb 2 te 5 in optical and electrical memory devices,

    S. Senkader and C. Wright, “Models for phase-change of ge 2 sb 2 te 5 in optical and electrical memory devices,” Journal of applied physics95, 504–511 (2004)

    2004

  54. [63]

    All-dielectric phase-change reconfigurable metasurface,

    A. Karvounis, B. Gholipour, K. F. MacDonald, and N. I. Zheludev, “All-dielectric phase-change reconfigurable metasurface,” Applied Physics Letters109(2016)

    2016

  55. [64]

    Design and simulations of soi cmos micro-hotplate gas sensors,

    F. Udrea, J. Gardner, D. Setiadi,et al., “Design and simulations of soi cmos micro-hotplate gas sensors,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical78, 180–190 (2001)

    2001

  56. [65]

    Heat transfer enhancement of cu-𝑎𝑙_{2}𝑜_{3}/water hybrid nanofluid flow over a stretching sheet,

    S. U. Devi and S. A. Devi, “Heat transfer enhancement of cu-𝑎𝑙_{2}𝑜_{3}/water hybrid nanofluid flow over a stretching sheet,” Journal of the Nigerian Mathematical Society36, 419–433 (2017)

    2017

  57. [66]

    The design of rewritable ultrahigh density scanning-probe phase-change memories,

    C. D. Wright, L. Wang, P. Shah,et al., “The design of rewritable ultrahigh density scanning-probe phase-change memories,” IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology10, 900–912 (2010)

    2010

  58. [67]

    Design of practicable phase-change metadevices for near-infrared absorber and modulator applications,

    S. G.-C. Carrillo, G. R. Nash, H. Hayat,et al., “Design of practicable phase-change metadevices for near-infrared absorber and modulator applications,” Optics express24, 13563–13573 (2016)

    2016

  59. [68]

    Numerical simulation of si nanosecond laser annealing by comsol multiphysics,

    M. Darif, N. Semmar, and F. Orléans Cedex, “Numerical simulation of si nanosecond laser annealing by comsol multiphysics,” inProceedings of the COMSOL Conference 2008 Hannover,(2008), pp. 567–571

    2008

  60. [69]

    Enhanced surface effects and optical property modulation of ge2sb2te5 by pulsed laser irradiation,

    J. Liang, G. Chen, X. Niu,et al., “Enhanced surface effects and optical property modulation of ge2sb2te5 by pulsed laser irradiation,” Optical Materials Express13, 566–574 (2023)

    2023

  61. [70]

    Transmissivity to reflectivity change delay phenomenon observed in gete thin films at laser-induced reamorphization,

    A. Kiselev, V. Mikhalevsky, A. Burtsev,et al., “Transmissivity to reflectivity change delay phenomenon observed in gete thin films at laser-induced reamorphization,” Optics & Laser Technology143, 107305 (2021)

    2021

  62. [71]

    Modeling and impacts of the latent heat of phase change and specific heat for phase change materials,

    J. Scoggin, R. Khan, H. Silva, and A. Gokirmak, “Modeling and impacts of the latent heat of phase change and specific heat for phase change materials,” Applied Physics Letters112(2018)

    2018

  63. [72]

    Laser dynamic control of the thermal emissivity of a planar cavity structure based on a phase-change material,

    D. Kang, Y. Kim, and M. Lee, “Laser dynamic control of the thermal emissivity of a planar cavity structure based on a phase-change material,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces16, 4925–4933 (2024)

    2024

  64. [73]

    Design of hybrid metal-dielectric (al–tio2) metasurfaces rgb color filters,

    A. Soliman, C. Williams, and T. D. Wilkinson, “Design of hybrid metal-dielectric (al–tio2) metasurfaces rgb color filters,” Journal of Physics: Photonics7, 025025 (2025)

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.