arxiv: 2511.21805 · v2 · submitted 2025-11-26 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Effects of Resolution and Local Stability on Galactic Disks: I. Multiple Spiral Mode Formation via Swing Amplification

SungWon Kwak , Ivan Minchev , Christoph Pfrommer , Matthias Steinmetz , Sukyoung K. Yi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 04:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA

keywords galactic disksspiral modesswing amplificationlive halonumerical resolutionFourier amplitudesbar formationangular momentum transport

0 comments

The pith

Live galactic disks with responsive halos develop multiple spiral modes in a cascading sequence from high to low m via swing amplification.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how spiral structures form in Milky Way-like galaxy models without added perturbations. It shows that numerical resolution and the presence of a live halo, rather than a fixed potential, determine whether spirals appear as faint noise or as organized modes that cascade in mode number and radius. Higher-mode spirals grow and fade first, followed by lower modes that drift inward, sustained by local swing amplification and interference between modes. This process allows angular momentum transport in the inner disk leading to bar formation, which fixed-halo models miss. The findings highlight the gravitational responsiveness of the halo as essential for regenerating multi-mode spirals.

Core claim

In all sufficiently resolved live-halo models where the dark matter particle mass is at most ten times the stellar mass, the spirals display a cascading sequence: higher-m modes form and decay first, followed by the delayed emergence of lower-m modes, accompanied by an inward drift of the activity's epicenter. This arises from local swing amplification for initial short-wavelength growth combined with interference between long-lived modes causing amplitude modulations. The m=3 mode marks the start of inner-disk angular-momentum transport before bar formation.

What carries the argument

The cascading sequence of spiral modes, driven by swing amplification in live halos, which organizes the growth and decay of Fourier modes m=1 to 6.

If this is right

Multi-mode spirals can sustain themselves through mode interference even as individual modes decay.
The transition to bar formation is preceded by m=3 mode activity in the inner disk.
Fixed-potential models fail to capture the full evolution due to lack of halo response.
Appropriate mass resolution in the halo is necessary to avoid excessive shot noise and enable coherent cascading.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Simulations of disk galaxies should prioritize live halos with mass ratios at or below 10 to model spiral regeneration accurately.
This cascade may explain recurrent spiral patterns observed in real galaxies without external triggers.
Varying the local stability parameter could predictably shift the timing of mode emergence in the sequence.

Load-bearing premise

The observed differences in spiral behavior between live-halo and fixed-potential models stem mainly from the halo's gravitational responsiveness rather than from numerical artifacts or specific initial conditions.

What would settle it

Run a high-resolution live-halo simulation with m_DM/m_star = 10 and check if higher-m modes appear and decay before lower-m modes with inward epicenter drift; absence of this sequence would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.21805 by Christoph Pfrommer, Ivan Minchev, Matthias Steinmetz, Sukyoung K. Yi, SungWon Kwak.

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Temporal evolution of the radially averaged value of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Comparison of radial profiles of individual Fourier modes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Fractional change of the total disk angular momentum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Fourier contour map calculated from the time evolution of radial Fourier profiles of each mode and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: The same as Figure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: The same as Figure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Amplitude of ⟨Fsum⟩ within 15 kpc as a function of the minimum Toomre Q value of each model, as labeled, with different halo concentration parameters c. The size of a circle increases with the evolution time. The time interval of each snapshot used is 0.05 Gyr. The left panel is for the low resolution, r1, models, and the right panel is for the r2 models [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: Temporal change of the slope obtained by performing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_11.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We investigate the formation of multiple spiral modes in Milky Way-like disk-halo systems without explicitly exciting perturbations. We explore how numerical resolution, the level of local disk stability, and the presence of a live halo influence both the initial appearance and the subsequent evolution of these modes. To characterize spiral structure, we compute Fourier amplitudes for modes $m=1$-$6$. In marginally unstable, lower-resolution disks ($N_\star=5\times10^6$, $N_{\rm DM}=1.14\times10^7$), faint features appear within the first $0.5$ Gyr due to numerical noise, in contrast to high-resolution models where perturbations emerge later. Across all sufficiently resolved, live-halo models with $m_{\rm DM}/m_\star \le 10$, the spirals exhibit a cascading sequence in both mode number and radius: higher-$m$ modes form and decay first, followed by the delayed emergence of lower-$m$ modes, with an inward drift of the activity's epicenter. This behavior reflects a combination of local swing amplification, which explains the initial growth of short-wavelength modes, and interference between coexisting long-lived spiral modes, which accounts for the recurrent short-timescale amplitude modulations. In contrast, models with a fixed halo potential or coarse halo resolution ($N_{\rm DM}=1.14\times10^6$ and $m_{\rm DM}/m_\star=100$) show strong early spirals but lack this coherent cascading behavior, owing to excessive shot noise and insufficient halo responsiveness. The $m=3$ mode plays a transitional role, marking the onset of angular-momentum transport in the inner disk that precedes bar formation, a process absent in fixed-potential models. Our results show that a live halo with appropriate mass resolution provides the gravitational response needed to sustain and regenerate multi-mode spiral structure, even though the total angular-momentum exchange remains small.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Resolved live-halo runs show a higher-m to lower-m spiral cascade with inward drift that fixed-potential and coarse-halo cases miss, but the link to halo responsiveness needs tighter noise-matched controls.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that sufficiently resolved live-halo models produce a clear sequence where higher-m modes appear and fade first, followed by lower-m modes, with the epicenter drifting inward over time. Fixed-potential runs and coarsely resolved halos instead show strong early spirals without this pattern. This comes from direct N-body comparisons that vary stellar particle count, DM particle count, and the DM-to-star mass ratio while tracking Fourier amplitudes for m=1 to 6 in marginally unstable disks. The live halo with m_DM/m_star at or below 10 appears to sustain swing amplification and allow mode interference that fixed setups suppress. The m=3 mode is singled out as marking the start of inner-disk angular-momentum transport before bar formation. That comparative setup and the concrete timing differences are the useful parts. The work gives practical pointers on what resolution and halo treatment are needed to avoid noise-driven artifacts when trying to model multi-mode spirals. On the soft side, the attribution to halo gravitational responsiveness is the load-bearing claim, yet the stress-test concern holds some weight here. The timing offset between early noise features at low resolution and delayed emergence at high resolution could trace to differences in the initial Poisson spectrum or how amplitudes are thresholded rather than responsiveness alone. Without explicit tests that hold particle noise fixed while toggling halo responsiveness, or full convergence checks with error bars on the mode amplitudes, the causal step remains a bit loose. The abstract already flags the contrast with the coarse-halo case, but more matched controls would make the distinction sharper. This paper is for people running or reading N-body simulations of galactic disks who need guidance on numerical requirements for realistic spiral structure. A reader focused on galactic dynamics or simulation methods would get concrete value from the resolution and halo-type comparisons. I would send it for peer review. The simulations are straightforward and the reported differences are specific enough that referees can assess the controls and ask for the missing checks.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports N-body simulations of Milky Way-like disk-halo systems examining spontaneous formation of multiple spiral modes. It finds that sufficiently resolved live-halo models with m_DM/m_star ≤ 10 exhibit a cascading sequence: higher-m modes form and decay first, followed by lower-m modes with inward epicenter drift, attributed to swing amplification plus mode interference enabled by halo responsiveness. Fixed-potential and coarse-halo (N_DM=1.14e6, m_DM/m_star=100) runs instead produce strong early spirals without the cascade due to excessive shot noise and insufficient responsiveness. The m=3 mode is identified as transitional for inner-disk angular-momentum transport preceding bar formation.

Significance. If robust, the results demonstrate that live halos with adequate mass resolution are essential for sustaining realistic multi-mode spiral activity via gravitational response, providing a mechanism linking local stability, swing amplification, and recurrent mode interference. The direct comparative runs across resolutions and halo types offer concrete guidance on numerical requirements for disk simulations and implications for angular-momentum transport and bar precursors.

major comments (2)

[§3] §3 (live-halo vs. fixed-potential comparisons): The attribution of the higher-m to lower-m cascade and inward drift specifically to halo gravitational responsiveness is load-bearing for the central claim, yet the manuscript does not present a controlled test that suppresses halo response while holding the initial Poisson noise spectrum and particle numbers fixed (e.g., via a fixed potential with matched noise seeding). Without this, differences in timing offset and sequence coherence could arise from unaccounted IC variations rather than responsiveness.
[Results] Results on Fourier amplitudes (live-halo models with N_star=5e6, N_DM=1.14e7): No error bars, multiple realizations, or explicit convergence tests beyond the two resolution levels are reported for the mode amplitude time series; this weakens quantification of the 'coherent cascading behavior' and the claimed distinction from coarse-halo runs.

minor comments (3)

[Abstract] Abstract: The qualifier 'sufficiently resolved' should be tied to explicit numerical criteria (e.g., m_DM/m_star threshold and particle counts) rather than left implicit.
[Methods] Methods: Additional detail on the radial Toomre Q profile initialization and how it evolves across runs would clarify the role of local stability in setting the swing-amplification timescale.
[Figures] Figure captions and text: Ensure consistent labeling of time intervals and mode numbers when illustrating the sequence and epicenter drift to aid reader interpretation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and for recognizing the potential significance of our results on multi-mode spiral formation. We address each major comment below with point-by-point responses, indicating where revisions will be incorporated to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: §3 (live-halo vs. fixed-potential comparisons): The attribution of the higher-m to lower-m cascade and inward drift specifically to halo gravitational responsiveness is load-bearing for the central claim, yet the manuscript does not present a controlled test that suppresses halo response while holding the initial Poisson noise spectrum and particle numbers fixed (e.g., via a fixed potential with matched noise seeding). Without this, differences in timing offset and sequence coherence could arise from unaccounted IC variations rather than responsiveness.

Authors: We agree that isolating halo responsiveness from variations in the initial Poisson noise is important for strengthening the central claim. Our fixed-potential runs use identical disk initial conditions but contain no halo particles, while the coarse-halo runs include halo particles at higher individual mass. To provide the requested controlled test, we will add new simulations in the revised manuscript in which halo particles are initialized with the same number and positions as in the live-halo cases but are not allowed to respond dynamically (i.e., their potential is held fixed after t=0). These runs will match the noise spectrum while suppressing halo response, allowing a direct assessment of whether the cascade requires live halo responsiveness. revision: yes
Referee: Results on Fourier amplitudes (live-halo models with N_star=5e6, N_DM=1.14e7): No error bars, multiple realizations, or explicit convergence tests beyond the two resolution levels are reported for the mode amplitude time series; this weakens quantification of the 'coherent cascading behavior' and the claimed distinction from coarse-halo runs.

Authors: We acknowledge that error bars from multiple realizations would improve the quantitative support for the cascading sequence and the distinction from coarse-halo behavior. Performing additional high-resolution realizations is computationally expensive, so we have relied on the two resolution levels to illustrate the resolution dependence. In the revised manuscript we will add shaded uncertainty regions based on short-term temporal variations within each time series, explicitly discuss convergence between the presented resolution levels, and note the single-realization limitation while emphasizing that the qualitative contrast in spiral evolution between live high-resolution, coarse-halo, and fixed-potential models remains consistent. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: claims rest on direct N-body comparisons without self-referential reduction

full rationale

The paper reports empirical outcomes from suites of N-body simulations that vary particle number, halo responsiveness (live vs fixed potential), and mass resolution. The cascading higher-m to lower-m sequence and inward epicenter drift are presented as observed patterns in the Fourier amplitude time series for sufficiently resolved live-halo runs; these patterns are contrasted against fixed-potential and coarse-halo controls but are not obtained by fitting parameters to the same data or by equations that define the output in terms of the input. Swing amplification is invoked as an explanatory mechanism drawn from prior literature rather than derived within the paper. No load-bearing self-citation, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of known results occurs in the central claims. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external simulation benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on standard galactic dynamics assumptions about swing amplification and mode interference plus specific numerical resolution choices that control noise levels.

free parameters (3)

Stellar particle number N_star
Set to 5e6 in lower-resolution models to examine effects of numerical noise on early faint features.
DM particle number N_DM
Set to 1.14e7 or 1.14e6 to test halo resolution impact on responsiveness and shot noise.
DM-to-star mass ratio m_DM/m_star
Threshold of ≤10 used to define sufficiently resolved live-halo models.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Local swing amplification governs initial growth of short-wavelength modes
Invoked in the abstract to explain why higher-m modes appear first.
domain assumption Interference between coexisting long-lived modes produces recurrent amplitude modulations
Used to account for short-timescale variations in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5676 in / 1457 out tokens · 71987 ms · 2026-05-17T04:28:54.669089+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We compute Fourier amplitudes for modes m=1–6... higher-m modes form and decay first, followed by the delayed emergence of lower-m modes, with an inward drift of the activity's epicenter. This behavior reflects a combination of local swing amplification... and interference between coexisting long-lived spiral modes.
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Q = κ σ_R / (3.36 G Σ_⋆)... swing amplification... live halo with appropriate mass resolution provides the gravitational response needed to sustain and regenerate multi-mode spiral structure

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Nexae in caverna: the secular evolution of disks via collectively excited, transient spiral structure
astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Galactic disks evolve secularly through transient, self-quenching spiral episodes excited non-resonantly by mild gradients (cavernae), with high-multiplicity spirals dominating in cold disks and lower-multiplicity one...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 82 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

[1]

2002, ApJ, 569, L83

Athanassoula, E. 2002, ApJ, 569, L83

work page 2002
[2]

2012, MNRAS, 426, L46

Athanassoula, E. 2012, MNRAS, 426, L46

work page 2012
[3]

2014, MNRAS, 438, L81

Athanassoula, E. 2014, MNRAS, 438, L81

work page 2014
[4]

& Sellwood, J

Athanassoula, E. & Sellwood, J. A. 1986, MNRAS, 221, 213

work page 1986
[5]

& Tremaine, S

Binney, J. & Tremaine, S. 2008, Galactic Dynamics: Second Edition

work page 2008
[6]

J., Hernquist, L., et al

Bose, S., Eisenstein, D. J., Hernquist, L., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 5693

work page 2019
[7]

& Valtonen, M

Byrd, G. & Valtonen, M. 1990, ApJ, 350, 89

work page 1990
[8]

Byrd, G. G. & Howard, S. 1992, AJ, 103, 1089

work page 1992
[9]

Stellar Migration by Short Lived Density Peaks Arising from Interference of Spiral Density Waves in an N-body Simulation

Comparetta, J. & Quillen, A. C. 2012, arXiv:1207.5753 [arXiv:1207.5753]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[10]

Debattista, V . P. & Sellwood, J. A. 2000, ApJ, 543, 704

work page 2000
[11]

2001, MNRAS, 324, 273

Dehnen, W. 2001, MNRAS, 324, 273

work page 2001
[12]

2004, MNRAS, 348, 977 D’Onghia, E

Diemand, J., Moore, B., Stadel, J., & Kazantzidis, S. 2004, MNRAS, 348, 977 D’Onghia, E. 2015, ApJ, 808, L8 D’Onghia, E., V ogelsberger, M., & Hernquist, L. 2013, ApJ, 766, 34

work page 2004
[13]

Donner, K. J. & Thomasson, M. 1994, A&A, 290, 785

work page 1994
[14]

2009, ApJ, 697, 293

Dubinski, J., Berentzen, I., & Shlosman, I. 2009, ApJ, 697, 293

work page 2009
[15]

2021, A&A, 651, A109

Dubois, Y ., Beckmann, R., Bournaud, F., et al. 2021, A&A, 651, A109

work page 2021
[16]

E., Páez, R

Efthymiopoulos, C., Kyziropoulos, P. E., Páez, R. I., Zouloumi, K., & Gravvanis, G. A. 2019, MNRAS, 484, 1487

work page 2019
[17]

G., Elmegreen, D

Elmegreen, B. G., Elmegreen, D. M., & Montenegro, L. 1992, ApJS, 79, 37

work page 1992
[18]

& Pichon, C

Fouvry, J.-B. & Pichon, C. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 1982

work page 2015
[19]

S., Baba, J., Saitoh, T

Fujii, M. S., Baba, J., Saitoh, T. R., et al. 2011, ApJ, 730, 109

work page 2011
[20]

S., Bédorf, J., Baba, J., & Portegies Zwart, S

Fujii, M. S., Bédorf, J., Baba, J., & Portegies Zwart, S. 2018, MNRAS, 477, 1451

work page 2018
[21]

F., Rodríguez-Meza, M

Gabbasov, R. F., Rodríguez-Meza, M. A., Klapp, J., & Cervantes-Cota, J. L. 2006, A&A, 449, 1043

work page 2006
[22]

& Seiden, P

Gerola, H. & Seiden, P. E. 1978, ApJ, 223, 129

work page 1978
[23]

Y ., Goodman, J., & Frei, Z

Gnedin, O. Y ., Goodman, J., & Frei, Z. 1995, AJ, 110, 1105

work page 1995
[24]

& Lynden-Bell, D

Goldreich, P. & Lynden-Bell, D. 1965, MNRAS, 130, 125 Gómez, F. A., Minchev, I., Villalobos, Á., O’Shea, B. W., & Williams, M. E. K. 2012, MNRAS, 419, 2163 Grosbøl, P., Patsis, P. A., & Pompei, E. 2004, A&A, 423, 849

work page 1965
[25]

E., Bamford, S

Hart, R. E., Bamford, S. P., Keel, W. C., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 932

work page 2018
[26]

E., Bamford, S

Hart, R. E., Bamford, S. P., Willett, K. W., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 461, 3663

work page 2016
[27]

L., Quillen, A

Henry, A. L., Quillen, A. C., & Gutermuth, R. 2003, AJ, 126, 2831

work page 2003
[28]

1990, ApJ, 356, 359

Hernquist, L. 1990, ApJ, 356, 359

work page 1990
[29]

2020, MNRAS, 497, 933

Hilmi, T., Minchev, I., Buck, T., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 497, 933

work page 2020
[30]

& Athanassoula, E

Iannuzzi, F. & Athanassoula, E. 2013, MNRAS, 436, 1161

work page 2013
[31]

& Kim, W.-T

Jang, D. & Kim, W.-T. 2023, ApJ, 942, 106

work page 2023
[32]

2000, A&A, 358, 845

Jerjen, H., Kalnajs, A., & Binggeli, B. 2000, A&A, 358, 845

work page 2000
[33]

Julian, W. H. & Toomre, A. 1966, ApJ, 146, 810

work page 1966
[34]

2024, MNRAS, 533, 3975

Khoperskov, S., Minchev, I., Steinmetz, M., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 533, 3975

work page 2024
[35]

2017, ApJ, 839, 24

Kwak, S., Kim, W.-T., Rey, S.-C., & Kim, S. 2017, ApJ, 839, 24

work page 2017
[36]

Kwak, S., Kim, W.-T., Rey, S.-C., & Quinn, T. R. 2019, ApJ, 887, 139

work page 2019
[37]

2011, MNRAS, 410, 166 Łokas, E

Lintott, C., Schawinski, K., Bamford, S., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 410, 166 Łokas, E. L., Athanassoula, E., Debattista, V . P., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 1339

work page 2011
[38]

D., Fall, S

Ludlow, A. D., Fall, S. M., Schaye, J., & Obreschkow, D. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 5114

work page 2021
[39]

V ., V ogelsberger, M., Torrey, P., & Springel, V

Marinacci, F., Sales, L. V ., V ogelsberger, M., Torrey, P., & Springel, V . 2019, MNRAS, 489, 4233

work page 2019
[40]

2025, A&A, 701, A88

Marques, L., Minchev, I., Ratcliffe, B., et al. 2025, A&A, 701, A88

work page 2025
[41]

& Tagger, M

Masset, F. & Tagger, M. 1997, A&A, 322, 442

work page 1997
[42]

E., Rand, R

Meidt, S. E., Rand, R. J., & Merrifield, M. R. 2009, ApJ, 702, 277 Article number, page 17 A&A proofs:manuscript no. main

work page 2009
[43]

E., Rand, R

Meidt, S. E., Rand, R. J., Merrifield, M. R., Shetty, R., & V ogel, S. N. 2008, ApJ, 688, 224

work page 2008
[44]

R., Rand, R

Merrifield, M. R., Rand, R. J., & Meidt, S. E. 2006, MNRAS, 366, L17

work page 2006
[45]

1996, AJ, 111, 2462

Merritt, D. 1996, AJ, 111, 2462

work page 1996
[46]

2011, A&A, 527, A147

Minchev, I., Famaey, B., Combes, F., et al. 2011, A&A, 527, A147

work page 2011
[47]

2015, ApJ, 804, L9

Minchev, I., Martig, M., Streich, D., et al. 2015, ApJ, 804, L9

work page 2015
[48]

& Quillen, A

Minchev, I. & Quillen, A. C. 2006, MNRAS, 368, 623

work page 2006
[49]

C., Williams, M., et al

Minchev, I., Quillen, A. C., Williams, M., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 396, L56

work page 2009
[50]

J., Mao, S., & White, S

Mo, H. J., Mao, S., & White, S. D. M. 1998, MNRAS, 295, 319

work page 1998
[51]

1996, Nature, 379, 613

Moore, B., Katz, N., Lake, G., Dressler, A., & Oemler, A. 1996, Nature, 379, 613

work page 1996
[52]

1998, ApJ, 495, 139

Moore, B., Lake, G., & Katz, N. 1998, ApJ, 495, 139

work page 1998
[53]

Mueller, M. W. & Arnett, W. D. 1976, ApJ, 210, 670

work page 1976
[54]

H., Kim, W.-T., & Lee, H

Oh, S. H., Kim, W.-T., & Lee, H. M. 2015, ApJ, 807, 73

work page 2015
[55]

H., Kim, W.-T., Lee, H

Oh, S. H., Kim, W.-T., Lee, H. M., & Kim, J. 2008, ApJ, 683, 94

work page 2008
[56]

& Łokas, E

Peschken, N. & Łokas, E. L. 2019, MNRAS, 483, 2721

work page 2019
[57]

C., Dougherty, J., Bagley, M

Quillen, A. C., Dougherty, J., Bagley, M. B., Minchev, I., & Comparetta, J. 2011, MNRAS, 417, 762

work page 2011
[58]

& Salo, H

Rautiainen, P. & Salo, H. 1999, A&A, 348, 737

work page 1999
[59]

S., et al

Reddish, J., Kraljic, K., Petersen, M. S., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 160

work page 2022
[60]

& Rieke, M

Rix, H.-W. & Rieke, M. J. 1993, ApJ, 418, 123

work page 1993
[61]

1961, The Hubble Atlas of Galaxies

Sandage, A. 1961, The Hubble Atlas of Galaxies

work page 1961
[62]

1976, ApJS, 31, 313

Schweizer, F. 1976, ApJS, 31, 313

work page 1976
[63]

Sellwood, J. A. 2012, ApJ, 751, 44

work page 2012
[64]

Sellwood, J. A. 2016, ApJ, 819, 92

work page 2016
[65]

Sellwood, J. A. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 3103

work page 2020
[66]

Sellwood, J. A. 2021, MNRAS, 506, 3018

work page 2021
[67]

Sellwood, J. A. & Binney, J. J. 2002, MNRAS, 336, 785

work page 2002
[68]

Sellwood, J. A. & Carlberg, R. G. 2014, ApJ, 785, 137

work page 2014
[69]

Sellwood, J. A. & Carlberg, R. G. 2019, MNRAS, 489, 116

work page 2019
[70]

Sellwood, J. A. & Masters, K. L. 2022, ARA&A, 60 [arXiv:2110.05615]

work page arXiv 2022
[71]

L., & del Pino, A

Semczuk, M., Łokas, E. L., & del Pino, A. 2017, ApJ, 834, 7

work page 2017
[72]

2005, MNRAS, 361, 776

Springel, V ., Di Matteo, T., & Hernquist, L. 2005, MNRAS, 361, 776

work page 2005
[73]

2008, MNRAS, 391, 1685

Springel, V ., Wang, J., V ogelsberger, M., et al. 2008, MNRAS, 391, 1685

work page 2008
[74]

F., Athanassoula, E., & Pellat, R

Tagger, M., Sygnet, J. F., Athanassoula, E., & Pellat, R. 1987, ApJ, 318, L43

work page 1987
[75]

1964, ApJ, 139, 1217

Toomre, A. 1964, ApJ, 139, 1217

work page 1964
[76]

1981, in Structure and Evolution of Normal Galaxies, ed

Toomre, A. 1981, in Structure and Evolution of Normal Galaxies, ed. S. M. Fall & D. Lynden-Bell, 111–136

work page 1981
[77]

2024, MNRAS, 528, 3576

Vislosky, E., Minchev, I., Khoperskov, S., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 3576

work page 2024
[78]

2020, ApJS, 248, 32

Weinberger, R., Springel, V ., & Pakmor, R. 2020, ApJS, 248, 32

work page 2020
[79]

K., Jang, J

Yi, S. K., Jang, J. K., Devriendt, J., et al. 2024, ApJS, 271, 1

work page 2024
[80]

& Springel, V

Yurin, D. & Springel, V . 2014, MNRAS, 444, 62

work page 2014

Showing first 80 references.