Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 89 references

HEART-Watch: A multimodal physiological dataset from a Google Pixel Watch across different physical states

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper presents HEART-Watch, the first research dataset with four-minute consumer smartwatch ECG recordings in sitting, standing, and walking states, synchronized with PPG, accelerometer, chest ECG, and cuff blood pressure from 40 divers

desk verdict HEART-Watch fills a real gap with 4-minute consumer smartwatch ECG across postures, but the time-alignment is only roughly validated and the dataset is currently hard to access. read the letter →

arxiv 2512.03988 v2 pith:VUDXFGZ4 submitted 2025-12-03 cs.HC

Jathushan Kaetheeswaran , Boyi Ma , Ali Abedi , Shehroz Khan , Milad Lankarany This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.HC
keywords smartwatchECGphotoplethysmographyaccelerometercardiovasculardatasetpulsetransittimeheartratevariabilitydemographicdiversitysignalsynchronization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

HEART-Watch is a research dataset built around a Google Pixel Watch 2, recording four minutes of smartwatch ECG, photoplethysmography (PPG), and accelerometer data simultaneously with a reference chest ECG while each of 40 healthy adults sits, stands, and walks. The authors claim this is the first dataset to offer consumer smartwatch ECG recordings of that length across those three physical states, and one of the first to pair them with raw synchronized signals and detailed demographics. The resource matters because smartwatch algorithms are typically trained on short, homogeneous, or aggregate-only recordings; HEART-Watch provides prolonged raw signals with older adults, multiple self-identified racial groups, and varied body types to support realistic and fair validation. Initial checks show stable sampling rates, mostly strong signal quality, close QRS timing between watch and chest ECG, and a consistent PR-interval overestimation attributed to attenuated P-waves.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the synchronized multimodal recording pipeline. Raw streams are stored as separate CSVs; the synchronized version zero-centers ECG and PPG, linearly interpolates all signals to 250 Hz, aligns them by Unix timestamps, and then applies a constant time-domain shift estimated from the mean R-peak time difference between the smartwatch and chest ECG to correct clock offset and drift. This constant shift is what makes inter-modality timing analyses—pulse transit time, beat-to-beat heart rate, HRV—possible. The four-minute smartwatch ECG, captured by having participants hold a finger on the watch crown, is the novel signal the pipeline was designed to preserve and is the

What would settle it

Measure beat-by-beat R-peak (the sharp spike marking each heartbeat) time differences between the smartwatch and chest ECG across each four-minute file; if the difference drifts by more than a few milliseconds over the recording, the constant-shift model fails. A device-independent check would be to compare a simultaneous physical event (for example a tap or cuff inflation) detected in the accelerometer and chest ECG, avoiding any reliance on R-peak detection.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

HEART-Watch is a multimodal physiological dataset collected from a Google Pixel Watch 2 worn by 40 healthy adults (23 female, 17 male, ages 19–75). Each participant completed four-minute recordings in sitting, standing, and walking states, with the smartwatch capturing ECG, PPG, and accelerometer signals while a reference chest ECG was recorded with gel electrodes; five cuff blood-pressure readings with concurrent biosignals were taken during transitions between states. The dataset provides raw sensor values rather than proprietary aggregates, and the synchronized version aligns all modalities to 250 Hz. The paper's central claim is that this is the first research dataset to provide consumer

Load-bearing premise

The synchronization assumes that a single constant time shift, estimated from average R-peak delays between the watch and chest ECG, fully corrects clock offset and drift for the entire four-minute recording.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Researchers can use the synchronized files to benchmark heart-rate and HRV algorithms under realistic sitting, standing, and walking motion, including degraded smartwatch ECG segments that earlier datasets excluded.
  • Because each state lasts four minutes, frequency-domain HRV metrics like low- and very-low-frequency power can be computed, which 30-second smartwatch ECG recordings cannot support.
  • The combination of wrist ECG, wrist PPG, and accelerometer with chest ECG and cuff BP enables pulse-transit-time and cuffless blood-pressure studies from consumer hardware.
  • Demographic breadth (age 19–75, eight self-identified racial groups, varied height/weight) permits fairness and age-stratified comparisons of wearable algorithms.
  • The inclusion of weak or invalid smartwatch ECG segments supports training algorithms to be resilient to real-world signal loss.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the dataset's four-minute windows exceed the conventional 30-second smartwatch ECG clip, it likely supports frequency-domain HRV metrics that earlier consumer-watch datasets cannot; the paper notes the four-minute choice but does not itself compute those metrics.
  • The reported PR-interval overestimation may extend to the BP-measurement recordings; checking whether P-wave bias varies by age or body type could refine the delineation algorithm.
  • Since the first PPG channel is described as a probable reference channel, future work could test whether combining it with the second channel reduces motion artifacts during walking; the paper identifies the channels but does not perform this comparison.
  • A practical consequence for users: before computing pulse transit time, verify that R-peak delay residuals do not drift over the four minutes; if they do, per-segment re-alignment would be needed.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper introduces HEART-Watch, a multimodal physiological dataset collected from a Google Pixel Watch 2 (ECG, PPG, accelerometer) alongside reference chest ECG and intermittent cuff blood pressure from 40 healthy adults across sitting, standing, and walking states. The central claim is that HEART-Watch is the first research dataset to provide consumer-grade smartwatch ECG recordings of 4 minutes across these physical states, with synchronized raw signals and rich demographic diversity. The paper describes the acquisition hardware, protocol, data organization, synchronization procedure, and preliminary validation including sampling-rate stability, signal-quality statistics, ECG morphology comparison with Bland-Altman analysis, heart-rate estimation examples, and blood-pressure summaries. The dataset is made available under a data-use agreement through the authors' institution.

Significance. If the synchronization and data-sharing concerns are adequately addressed, HEART-Watch would be a valuable community resource. Its strengths include a diverse participant cohort (age 19-75, eight racial categories, varied body types), four-minute smartwatch ECG recordings across postural and walking states, simultaneous reference chest ECG and cuff BP, and a preprocessing pipeline whose code is promised alongside the data. The paper also provides reproducible validation scripts for sampling-rate and signal-strength checks. The clear documentation of sensor rates, weak-signal rates, and ECG morphology comparisons is a positive feature. The dataset directly targets a recognized gap in consumer-wearable cardiovascular research: the scarcity of open, raw, multimodal, prolonged smartwatch ECG data with demographic coverage. The validity of the central use case, however, depends on the temporal alignment between watch and chest signals, and that alignment is not quantitatively demonstrated in the current manuscript.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section 3.6 / Table 3 / Section 4.2 / Figure 5] The synchronization procedure is not adequately validated for the dataset's core claim. Section 3.6 states that after Unix-timestamp alignment, a 'constant time domain shift based on mean R-peak time differences' is applied 'to account for potential clock drift.' A constant shift can remove a fixed offset, but it cannot compensate for clock drift, which is time-varying. Table 3 shows that the smartwatch ECG sampling rate is ~250.93-250.96 Hz while the chest ECG is ~250.11-250.14 Hz across the physical states. Over a 4-minute recording, this ~0.3% relative rate difference implies a cumulative timing error on the order of 700-800 ms if the two clocks drift linearly and are not otherwise corrected. The published validation reports only mean sampling rates (Section 4.2) and shows a 15-second example in Figure 5, neither of which can expose drift over full sessions. Section 5 mentions 'risk o
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 7] The dataset is described as being available through a data-use agreement, but no persistent identifier, version number, or repository DOI is given. Adding a DOI or institutional repository link would improve reproducibility and citation.
  2. [Section 4.4] The PR-interval comparison shows a consistent overestimation bias (10-18 ms) with wide limits of agreement. This is presented as a finding, but the abstract/conclusion could briefly note this as a limitation of smartwatch ECG morphology analysis, since the dataset is intended for cardiovascular biomarker development.
  3. [Section 3.6.3] The statement that ppg_watch_two 'should be used for pulse waveform analysis' is based on 'internal testing' without quantitative supporting results. A brief summary of the testing (e.g., signal-to-noise ratio comparison) would make the recommendation more transparent.
  4. [General] Minor typographical issues: Section 3.5 has 'each participant s’' and Section 2/3 contain 'arrythmias' and 'heterogenicity' (e.g., Section 3.6.2, Section 2). A careful proofreading pass is recommended.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Only minor circularity: the synchronization validation replays the fitted R-peak shift; the central dataset claim is otherwise independent.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 3.6 (Data Organization) / Section 4.1 (Visualization of Synchronized Signals)]
    "Additional synchronization was performed by estimating a constant time domain shift based on mean R-peak time differences between the smartwatch and chest ECG data and shifting the watch signals accordingly... The R-wave spikes in both the chest and smartwatch ECG signals are closely aligned temporally across physical states."

    The synchronized CSV is constructed by fitting a constant shift to the mean R-peak time differences and shifting the watch signals. Section 4.1 then presents the resulting R-wave alignment as validation of synchronization. That alignment is the direct output of the fitting step, so the Figure 5 visualization is not independent evidence of time alignment; it reduces by construction to the shift-estimation step. The paper reports no held-out or residual alignment metric (e.g., post-shift R-peak differences across all participants) that would break the circle. This is a minor, non-central circularity: it affects only the demonstration of synchronization, not the dataset's existence, demographics, or intra-signal analyses such as QRS/PR durations.

full rationale

HEART-Watch is a dataset paper, not a derivation chain: the central claim is that a novel multimodal consumer-smartwatch dataset was collected with 4-minute ECGs across sitting, standing, and walking. That claim rests on the recruitment and acquisition procedures and the Table 1 literature comparison, not on a fitted parameter. The only potentially circular step is the synchronization validation: Section 3.6 aligns watch and chest signals using a mean R-peak-derived constant shift, and Section 4.1 shows R-wave alignment in Figure 5 as validation. That demonstration is tautological for the alignment itself, since the same mean R-peak difference was used to create the alignment. However, the paper does not base its main novelty or its ECG morphology, sampling-rate, or HR analyses on this tautology; the QRS/PR interval comparisons are intra-signal durations unaffected by a constant shift, and the sampling-rate and signal-strength checks are independent of the shift. The one self-citation (reference [27], a scoping review by overlapping authors) is used only to support the demographic-reporting gap and is not load-bearing for the dataset claim. Overall, the central claim has independent content, so the circularity score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on data-collection and synchronization assumptions rather than on new theoretical constructs. The main free parameter is the per-recording synchronization shift, which is fitted to the data itself. No new particles, forces, or physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • constant time-domain synchronization shift per recording = not reported
    Estimated from mean R-peak time differences between watch and chest ECG (Section 3.6) and used to shift all watch signals into alignment. This is a fitted calibration parameter whose value is not disclosed and whose assumption of constant drift is load-bearing for cross-device timing analyses.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Unix timestamps from the smartwatch, Arduino system, and BP monitor are accurate enough that a constant offset fully aligns them.
    Invoked in Section 3.6 when combining timestamps and applying a constant shift; if clock drift is non-linear, the synchronized CSVs contain timing errors not captured by the reported validation.
  • domain assumption The modified Mason-Likar chest electrode placement produces a valid Lead I reference ECG.
    Section 3.6.1 states the electrode setup 'has been shown to produce similar Lead I data to traditional 12-lead ECG systems' and is used as the reference for all smartwatch ECG comparisons.
  • domain assumption The second PPG channel (ppg_watch_two) is the pulsatile signal and the first is a reference/recovery channel.
    Section 3.6.3 says the manufacturer did not grant the full datasheet and the conclusion is based on 'internal testing'. The dataset organization and validation assume this channel assignment.
  • domain assumption Self-reported exclusion criteria and demographic data from participants are accurate.
    Section 3.2 relies on participants' self-report of being healthy and able to perform light activities; no clinical examination or verification is described.
  • domain assumption Thresholds for weak-signal classification (peak-to-peak < 0.1*sigma, ACC upper bound 1.5g, 50% weak-window rule) are appropriate for this dataset.
    Section 4.3 adopts these thresholds from prior literature (Park et al., Straczkiewicz et al.) and applies them without recalibration; different thresholds could change reported weak-signal percentages.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of HEART-Watch: A multimodal physiological dataset from a Google Pixel Watch across different physical states." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VUDXFGZ4

@misc{pith2026251203988,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: HEART-Watch: A multimodal physiological dataset from a Google Pixel Watch across different physical states},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VUDXFGZ4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2512.03988}
}
read the original abstract

Consumer-grade smartwatches offer a new option for personalized health monitoring for general consumers, as cardiovascular diseases continue to prevail as the leading cause of global mortality. The development and validation of reliable cardiovascular monitoring algorithms for these consumer-grade devices requires realistic biosignal data from diverse sets of participants. However, the availability of public consumer-grade smartwatch datasets with synchronized cardiovascular biosignals remains limited, and existing datasets often lack rich demographic diversity in their participant cohorts, potentially leading to biased algorithm development. This paper presents HEART-Watch, a multimodal physiological dataset of synchronized wrist-worn Google Pixel Watch electrocardiogram (ECG), photoplethysmography, and accelerometer signals from a diverse cohort of 40 healthy adults across three physical states - sitting, standing and walking - alongside reference chest ECG. Intermittent upper arm blood pressure measurements and concurrent biosignals were collected as an additional biomarker for future research. The motivation, methodology, and initial analyses of results are presented. HEART-Watch is intended to support the development and benchmarking of robust cardiovascular algorithms on consumer-grade smartwatches across diverse populations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Global burden of cardiovascular diseases: projections from 2025 to 2050

    Chong B, Jayabaskaran J, Jauhari SM, Chan SP, Goh R, Kueh MTW, et al. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases: projections from 2025 to 2050. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2025 Aug 25;32(11):1001–15

    2025

  2. [2]

    The Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk

    Vaduganathan M, Mensah GA, Turco JV, Fuster V, Roth GA. The Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Dec;80(25):2361–71

    2022

  3. [3]

    Sustainable Wearables: Wearable Technology for Enhancing the Quality of Human Life

    Lee J, Kim D, Ryoo HY, Shin BS. Sustainable Wearables: Wearable Technology for Enhancing the Quality of Human Life. Sustainability. 2016 May 11;8(5):466

    2016

  4. [4]

    Wrist -Worn Devices for Remote Monitoring of Cardiovascular Disease: A Survey

    Sadiq I, Ijaz A, Imran A. Wrist -Worn Devices for Remote Monitoring of Cardiovascular Disease: A Survey. IEEE Access. 2025;13:151111–36

    2025

  5. [5]

    The emerging field of mobile health

    Steinhubl SR, Muse ED, Topol EJ. The emerging field of mobile health. Sci Transl Med [Internet]. 2015 Apr 15 [cited 2025 Sept 19];7(283). Available from: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa3487

    work page doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa3487 2015

  6. [6]

    Smart wearable devices in cardiovascular care: where we are and how to move forward

    Bayoumy K, Gaber M, Elshafeey A, Mhaimeed O, Dineen EH, Marvel FA, et al. Smart wearable devices in cardiovascular care: where we are and how to move forward. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021 Aug;18(8):581–99

    2021

  7. [7]

    Wearable Devices in Cardiovascular Medicine

    Hughes A, Shandhi MMH, Master H, Dunn J, Brittain E. Wearable Devices in Cardiovascular Medicine. Circ Res. 2023 Mar 3;132(5):652–70

    2023

  8. [8]

    Smartwatch Market Size, Share and Industry Analysis [Internet]

    Global Market Insights. Smartwatch Market Size, Share and Industry Analysis [Internet]. 2025. Available from: https://www.gminsights.com/industry-analysis/smartwatch-market

    2025

Show all 89 references
  1. [9]

    The Future of Wearable Technologies and Remote Monitoring in Health Care

    Liao Y, Thompson C, Peterson S, Mandrola J, Beg MS. The Future of Wearable Technologies and Remote Monitoring in Health Care. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2019 May;(39):115–21

    2019

  2. [10]

    Current perspectives on wearable rhythm recordings for clinical decision-making: the wEHRAbles 2 survey

    Manninger M, Zweiker D, Svennberg E, Chatzikyriakou S, Pavlovic N, Zaman JAB, et al. Current perspectives on wearable rhythm recordings for clinical decision-making: the wEHRAbles 2 survey. EP Eur. 2021 July 18;23(7):1106–13

    2021

  3. [11]

    Wearable Devices for Remote Monitoring of Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability—What We Know and What Is Coming

    Alugubelli N, Abuissa H, Roka A. Wearable Devices for Remote Monitoring of Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability—What We Know and What Is Coming. Sensors. 2022 Nov 17;22(22):8903

    2022

  4. [12]

    Artificial Intelligence and Wearables in Cardiology—Promise and Peril

    Friedman P, Lopez-Jimenez F, Nishimura R, Attia Z. Artificial Intelligence and Wearables in Cardiology—Promise and Peril. Am J Cardiol. 2022;183:127–35. 28

    2022

  5. [13]

    Willingness to Share Data From Wearable Health and Activity Trackers: Analysis of the 2019 Health Information National Trends Survey Data

    Rising CJ, Gaysynsky A, Blake KD, Jensen RE, Oh A. Willingness to Share Data From Wearable Health and Activity Trackers: Analysis of the 2019 Health Information National Trends Survey Data. JMIR MHealth UHealth. 2021 Dec 13;9(12):e29190

    2019

  6. [14]

    Wearables and Atrial Fibrillation: Advances in Detection, Clinical Impact, Ethical Concerns, and Future Perspectives

    Francisco A, Pascoal C, Lamborne P, Morais H, Gonçalves M. Wearables and Atrial Fibrillation: Advances in Detection, Clinical Impact, Ethical Concerns, and Future Perspectives. Cureus. 2025;17(1)

    2025

  7. [16]

    Accuracy in Wrist -Worn, Sensor -Based Measurements of Heart Rate and Energy Expenditure in a Diverse Cohort

    Shcherbina A, Mattsson C, Waggott D, Salisbury H, Christle J, Hastie T, et al. Accuracy in Wrist -Worn, Sensor -Based Measurements of Heart Rate and Energy Expenditure in a Diverse Cohort. J Pers Med. 2017 May 24;7(2):3

    2017

  8. [18]

    510(k) summary: Apple Inc

    Browning S. 510(k) summary: Apple Inc. — Hypertension Notification Feature (K250507) [Internet]. U.S. Food & Drug Administration; 2025. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf25/K250507.pdf

    2025

  9. [19]

    Clinical implementation of an AI -enabled ECG for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy detection

    Love CJ, Lampert J, Huneycutt D, Musat DL, Shah M, Enciso JES, et al. Clinical implementation of an AI -enabled ECG for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy detection. Heart. 2025 Apr 16;heartjnl-2024-325608

    2025

  10. [20]

    Multichannel ECG recording from waist using textile sensors

    Alizadeh Meghrazi M, Tian Y, Mahnam A, Bhattachan P, Eskandarian L, Taghizadeh Kakhki S, et al. Multichannel ECG recording from waist using textile sensors. Biomed Eng OnLine. 2020 Dec;19(1):48

    2020

  11. [21]

    Investigating sources of inaccuracy in wearable optical heart rate sensors

    Bent B, Goldstein BA, Kibbe WA, Dunn JP. Investigating sources of inaccuracy in wearable optical heart rate sensors. Npj Digit Med. 2020 Feb 10;3(1):18

    2020

  12. [22]

    Investigating the accuracy of Garmin PPG sensors on differing skin types based on the Fitzpatrick scale: cross-sectional comparison study

    Icenhower A, Murphy C, Brooks AK, Irby M, N’dah K, Robison J, et al. Investigating the accuracy of Garmin PPG sensors on differing skin types based on the Fitzpatrick scale: cross-sectional comparison study. Front Digit Health. 2025;7

    2025

  13. [23]

    Detection of Atrial Fibrillation in a Large Population Using Wearable Devices: The Fitbit Heart Study

    Lubitz SA, Faranesh AZ, Selvaggi C, Atlas SJ, McManus DD, Singer DE, et al. Detection of Atrial Fibrillation in a Large Population Using Wearable Devices: The Fitbit Heart Study. Circulation. 2022 Nov 8;146(19):1415–24

    2022

  14. [24]

    Large -Scale Assessment of a Smartwatch to Identify Atrial Fibrillation

    Perez MV, Mahaffey KW, Hedlin H, Rumsfeld JS, Garcia A, Ferris T, et al. Large -Scale Assessment of a Smartwatch to Identify Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 14;381(20):1909–17

    2019

  15. [25]

    Sleep staging algorithm based on smartwatch sensors for healthy and sleep apnea populations

    Silva FB, Uribe LFS, Cepeda FX, Alquati VFS, Guimarães JPS, Silva YGA, et al. Sleep staging algorithm based on smartwatch sensors for healthy and sleep apnea populations. Sleep Med. 2024 July;119:535–48

    2024

  16. [26]

    Validity of heart rate measurements in wrist-based monitors across skin tones during exercise

    Hung SH, Serwa K, Rosenthal G, Eng JJ. Validity of heart rate measurements in wrist-based monitors across skin tones during exercise. Sbrollini A, editor. PLOS ONE. 2025 Feb 10;20(2):e0318724

    2025

  17. [27]

    Artificial Intelligence-driven Real-time Monitoring of Cardiovascular Conditions with Wearable Devices: A Scoping Review (Preprint)

    Abedi A, Verma A, Jain D, Kaetheeswaran J, Chui C, Lankarany M, et al. Artificial Intelligence-driven Real-time Monitoring of Cardiovascular Conditions with Wearable Devices: A Scoping Review (Preprint). JMIR MHealth UHealth. 2025

    2025

  18. [28]

    Guidelines for wrist-worn consumer wearable assessment of heart rate in biobehavioral research

    Nelson BW, Low CA, Jacobson N, Areán P, Torous J, Allen NB. Guidelines for wrist-worn consumer wearable assessment of heart rate in biobehavioral research. Npj Digit Med. 2020 June 26;3(1):90

    2020

  19. [29]

    Modeling and Reconstructing Textile Sensor Noise: Implications for Wearable Technology

    Tian Y, Abdizadeh M, Mahnam A, Bhattachan P, Meghrazi MA, Eskandarian L, et al. Modeling and Reconstructing Textile Sensor Noise: Implications for Wearable Technology. In: 2020 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Bio logy Society (EMBC) [...

    2020

  20. [30]

    State of the science and recommendations for using wearable technology in sleep and circadian research

    de Zambotti M, Goldstein C, Cook J, Menghini L, Altini M, Cheng P, et al. State of the science and recommendations for using wearable technology in sleep and circadian research. Sleep. 2024;47(4)

    2024

  21. [31]

    A scoping review of robustness concepts for machine learning in healthcare

    Balendran A, Beji C, Bouvier F, Khalifa O, Evgeniou T, Ravaud P, et al. A scoping review of robustness concepts for machine learning in healthcare. Npj Digit Med. 2025 Jan 17;8(1):38

    2025

  22. [32]

    Systematic Comparison of ECG Delineation Algorithm Performance on Smartwatch Data

    Jaeger KM, Nissen M, Flaucher M, Graf L, Joanidopoulos J, Anneken L, et al. Systematic Comparison of ECG Delineation Algorithm Performance on Smartwatch Data. IEEE Access. 2024;12:160794–804

    2024

  23. [33]

    Using a Smartwatch to Record Precordial Electrocardiograms: A Validation Study

    Van Der Zande J, Strik M, Dubois R, Ploux S, Alrub SA, Caillol T, et al. Using a Smartwatch to Record Precordial Electrocardiograms: A Validation Study. Sensors. 2023 Feb 25;23(5):2555. 29

    2023

  24. [34]

    Feasibility analysis of heart rate monitoring of construction workers using a photoplethysmography (PPG) sensor embedded in a wristband-type activity tracker

    Hwang S, Seo J, Jebelli H, Lee S. Feasibility analysis of heart rate monitoring of construction workers using a photoplethysmography (PPG) sensor embedded in a wristband-type activity tracker. Autom Constr. 2016 Nov;71:372–81

    2016

  25. [35]

    Single-Lead ECG Recordings Including Einthoven and Wilson Leads by a Smartwatch: A New Era of Patient Directed Early ECG Differential Diagnosis of Cardiac Diseases? Sensors

    Samol A, Bischof K, Luani B, Pascut D, Wiemer M, Kaese S. Single-Lead ECG Recordings Including Einthoven and Wilson Leads by a Smartwatch: A New Era of Patient Directed Early ECG Differential Diagnosis of Cardiac Diseases? Sensors. 2019;19(20):4377

    2019

  26. [36]

    BigIdeasLab_STEP: Heart rate measurements captured by smartwatches for differing skin tones (version 1.0)

    Bent B, Dunn J. BigIdeasLab_STEP: Heart rate measurements captured by smartwatches for differing skin tones (version 1.0). 2021

    2021

  27. [37]

    Smartwatch heart rate data

    Biswas N, Ashili S. Smartwatch heart rate data. 2023

    2023

  28. [38]

    A PPG Signal Dataset Collected in Semi -Naturalistic Settings Using Galaxy Watch

    Park S, Zheng D, Lee U. A PPG Signal Dataset Collected in Semi -Naturalistic Settings Using Galaxy Watch. Sci Data. 2025 May 28;12(1):892

    2025

  29. [39]

    In-situ wearable-based dataset of continuous heart rate variability monitoring accompanied by sleep diaries [Internet]

    Baigutanova A, Park S, Constantinides M, Lee SW, Quercia D, Cha M. In-situ wearable-based dataset of continuous heart rate variability monitoring accompanied by sleep diaries [Internet]. figshare; 2025 [cited 2025 Sept 18]. p. 19793309660 Bytes. Av ailable from: https://spring...

    2025

  30. [40]

    A continuous real-world dataset comprising wearable- based heart rate variability alongside sleep diaries

    Baigutanova A, Park S, Constantinides M, Lee SW, Quercia D, Cha M. A continuous real-world dataset comprising wearable- based heart rate variability alongside sleep diaries. Sci Data. 2025 Aug 23;12(1):1474

    2025

  31. [41]

    Data and code for assessing the agreement of the Bangle.js2 during in -lab and 24h free -living conditions for measuring steps and heart rate

    Ravanelli N, Lin W, Richard M, Paquette S, KarLee Lefebvre, Brough A. Data and code for assessing the agreement of the Bangle.js2 during in -lab and 24h free -living conditions for measuring steps and heart rate. 2025 [cited 2025 Oct 3]; Available from: https://osf.io/8mzg5/

    2025

  32. [42]

    Validation of an Open-Source Smartwatch for Continuous Monitoring of Physical Activity and Heart Rate in Adults

    Ravanelli N, Lefebvre K, Brough A, Paquette S, Lin W. Validation of an Open-Source Smartwatch for Continuous Monitoring of Physical Activity and Heart Rate in Adults. Sensors. 2025;25(9):2926

    2025

  33. [43]

    Assessing Heart Rate Using Consumer Technology Association Standards

    Reece JD, Bunn JA, Choi M, Navalta JW. Assessing Heart Rate Using Consumer Technology Association Standards. Technologies. 2021 June 30;9(3):46

    2021

  34. [44]

    The effect of aging on the cutaneous microvasculature

    Bentov I, Reed MJ. The effect of aging on the cutaneous microvasculature. Microvasc Res. 2015 July;100:25–31

    2015

  35. [45]

    Clinical Validation of 5 Direct-to-Consumer Wearable Smart Devices to Detect Atrial Fibrillation

    Mannhart D, Lischer M, Knecht S, Du Fay De Lavallaz J, Strebel I, Serban T, et al. Clinical Validation of 5 Direct-to-Consumer Wearable Smart Devices to Detect Atrial Fibrillation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2023 Feb;9(2):232–42

    2023

  36. [46]

    A comprehensive accuracy assessment of Samsung smartwatch heart rate and heart rate variability

    Sarhaddi F, Kazemi K, Azimi I, Cao R, Niela -Vilén H, Axelin A, et al. A comprehensive accuracy assessment of Samsung smartwatch heart rate and heart rate variability. Mian Qaisar S, editor. PLOS ONE. 2022 Dec 8;17(12):e0268361

    2022

  37. [47]

    Comparative Assessment of Smartwatch Photoplethysmography Accuracy

    Jaiswal P, Sahu NK, Lone HR. Comparative Assessment of Smartwatch Photoplethysmography Accuracy. IEEE Sens Lett. 2024 Jan;8(1):1–4

    2024

  38. [48]

    GalaxyPPG: A PPG Signal Dataset Collected in Semi -Naturalistic Settings Using Galaxy Watch [Internet]

    Park S, Zheng D, Lee U. GalaxyPPG: A PPG Signal Dataset Collected in Semi -Naturalistic Settings Using Galaxy Watch [Internet]. Zenodo; 2025 [cited 2025 Sept 18]. Available from: https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.14635822

    2025 doi

  39. [49]

    Research study recruitment [Internet]

    KITE. Research study recruitment [Internet]. 2025. Available from: https://kite-uhn.com/recruit

    2025

  40. [50]

    Recommendations for determining the validity of consumer wearable heart rate devices: expert statement and checklist of the INTERLIVE Network

    Mühlen JM, Stang J, Lykke Skovgaard E, Judice PB, Molina-Garcia P, Johnston W, et al. Recommendations for determining the validity of consumer wearable heart rate devices: expert statement and checklist of the INTERLIVE Network. Br J Sports Med. 2021 July;55(14):767–79

    2021

  41. [51]

    Wearable Cuff -Less Blood Pressure Estimation at Home via Pulse Transit Time

    Ganti VG, Carek AM, Nevius BN, Heller JA, Etemadi M, Inan OT. Wearable Cuff -Less Blood Pressure Estimation at Home via Pulse Transit Time. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2021 June;25(6):1926–37

    2021

  42. [52]

    A new approach for daily life Blood -Pressure estimation using smart watch

    He J, Ou J, He A, Shu L, Liu T, Qu R, et al. A new approach for daily life Blood -Pressure estimation using smart watch. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2022 May;75:103616

    2022

  43. [53]

    Minimal Window Duration for Accurate HRV Recording in Athletes

    Bourdillon N, Schmitt L, Yazdani S, Vesin JM, Millet GP. Minimal Window Duration for Accurate HRV Recording in Athletes. Front Neurosci. 2017 Aug 10;11:456

    2017

  44. [54]

    Is Ultra -Short-Term Heart Rate Variability Valid in Non -static Conditions? Front Physiol

    Kim JW, Seok HS, Shin H. Is Ultra -Short-Term Heart Rate Variability Valid in Non -static Conditions? Front Physiol. 2021 Mar 30;12:596060. 30

    2021

  45. [55]

    Modulation of Pulse Propagation and Blood Flow via Cuff Inflation—New Distal Insights

    Bogatu LI, Turco S, Mischi M, Schmitt L, Woerlee P, Bresch E, et al. Modulation of Pulse Propagation and Blood Flow via Cuff Inflation—New Distal Insights. Sensors. 2021 Aug 19;21(16):5593

    2021

  46. [56]

    Effects of Pulse Transit Time and Pulse Arrival Time on Cuff-less Blood Pressure Estimation: A Comparison Study with Multiple Experimental Interventions

    Xie C, Wan C, Wang Y, Song J, Wu D, Li Y. Effects of Pulse Transit Time and Pulse Arrival Time on Cuff-less Blood Pressure Estimation: A Comparison Study with Multiple Experimental Interventions. In: 2023 45th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine...

    2023

  47. [57]

    Timing errors and temporal uncertainty in clinical databases—A narrative review

    Goodwin AJ, Eytan D, Dixon W, Goodfellow SD, Doherty Z, Greer RW, et al. Timing errors and temporal uncertainty in clinical databases—A narrative review. Front Digit Health. 2022 Aug 18;4:932599

    2022

  48. [58]

    Lead Systems

    Macfarlane PW. Lead Systems. In: Comprehensive Electrocardiology. Springer, London; 2010

    2010

  49. [59]

    A new system of multiple-lead exercise electrocardiography

    Mason RE, Likar I. A new system of multiple-lead exercise electrocardiography. Am Heart J. 1966;71:196–205

    1966

  50. [60]

    Advances in AI-enabled Wearable Systems

    Hassan S. Advances in AI-enabled Wearable Systems. Adv Intell Syst. 2023

    2023

  51. [61]

    Evaluation of Electrical Performance and Properties of Electroretinography Electrodes

    Man TTC, Yip YWY, Cheung FKF, Lee WS, Pang CP, Brelén ME. Evaluation of Electrical Performance and Properties of Electroretinography Electrodes. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020;9(7):45

    2020

  52. [62]

    Evaluation of low cost capacitive ECG prototypes: A hardware/software approach

    Güttler J, Georgoulas C, Linner T, Bock T. Evaluation of low cost capacitive ECG prototypes: A hardware/software approach. In 2016. p. 129–34

    2016

  53. [63]

    In: Cardiology explained [Internet]

    Chapter 3, Conquering the ECG. In: Cardiology explained [Internet]. London ; Chicago: Remedica; 2004. (Remedica explained series). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2214/

    2004

  54. [64]

    Smartwatch Electrocardiograms for Automated and Manual Diagnosis of Atrial Fibrillation: A Comparative Analysis of Three Models

    Abu-Alrub S, Strik M, Ramirez FD, Moussaoui N, Racine HP, Marchand H, et al. Smartwatch Electrocardiograms for Automated and Manual Diagnosis of Atrial Fibrillation: A Comparative Analysis of Three Models. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Feb 4;9:836375

    2022

  55. [65]

    A review on wearable photoplethysmography sensors and their potential future applications in health care

    Ghamari M. A review on wearable photoplethysmography sensors and their potential future applications in health care. Int J Biosens Bioelectron. 2018;4(4)

    2018

  56. [66]

    The 2023 wearable photoplethysmography roadmap

    Charlton PH, Allen J, Bailón R, Baker S, Behar JA, Chen F, et al. The 2023 wearable photoplethysmography roadmap. Physiol Meas. 2023;44(11):111001

    2023

  57. [67]

    Beer -lambert law along non -linear mean light pathways for the rational analysis of Photoplethysmography

    Rybynok VO, Kyriacou PA. Beer -lambert law along non -linear mean light pathways for the rational analysis of Photoplethysmography. J Phys Conf Ser. 2010 July 1;238:012061

    2010

  58. [68]

    A Dual-Channel PPG Readout System With Motion -Tolerant Adaptability for OLED -OPD Sensors

    Pandey RK, Chao PCP. A Dual-Channel PPG Readout System With Motion -Tolerant Adaptability for OLED -OPD Sensors. IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst. 2022 Feb;16(1):36–51

    2022

  59. [69]

    AFE4950 Integrated Analog Front -End [Internet]

    Texas Instruments. AFE4950 Integrated Analog Front -End [Internet]. 2025. Available from: https://www.ti.com/product/AFE4950#product-details

    2025

  60. [70]

    Evaluation of Smartphone and Smartwatch Accelerometer Data in Activity Classification

    Minh NC, Dao TH, Tran DN, Huy NQ, Thu NT, Tran DT. Evaluation of Smartphone and Smartwatch Accelerometer Data in Activity Classification. In IEEE; 2021. p. 33–8

    2021

  61. [71]

    Cuff-based blood pressure measurement: challenges and solutions

    Pilz N, Picone DS, Patzak A, Opatz OS, Lindner T, Fesseler L, et al. Cuff-based blood pressure measurement: challenges and solutions. Blood Press. 2024 Dec 31;33(1):2402368

    2024

  62. [72]

    OMRON Healthcare

    Iron Upper Arm Blood Pressure Monitor [Internet]. OMRON Healthcare. 2025. Available from: https://omronhealthcare.com/en-ca/products/iron-upper-arm-blood-pressure-monitor-bp5000

    2025

  63. [73]

    SensorManager | API reference [Internet]

    Android Developers. SensorManager | API reference [Internet]. 2025. Available from: https://developer.android.com/reference/android/hardware/SensorManager

    2025

  64. [74]

    Room Database Training [Internet]

    Android Developers. Room Database Training [Internet]. 2025. Available from: https://developer.android.com/training/data - storage/room

    2025

  65. [75]

    Kotlin Coroutines [Internet]

    Android Developers. Kotlin Coroutines [Internet]. 2025. Available from: https://developer.android.com/kotlin/coroutines

    2025

  66. [76]

    BioSPPy: A Python toolbox for physiological signal processing

    Bota P, Silva R, Carreiras C, Fred A, Da Silva HP. BioSPPy: A Python toolbox for physiological signal processing. SoftwareX. 2024 May;26:101712

    2024

  67. [77]

    NeuroKit2: A Python toolbox for neurophysiological signal processing

    Makowski D, Pham T, Lau ZJ, Brammer JC, Lespinasse F, Pham H, et al. NeuroKit2: A Python toolbox for neurophysiological signal processing. Behav Res Methods. 2021 Aug;53(4):1689–96. 31

    2021

  68. [78]

    Wearable Electrocardiogram Quality Assessment Using Wavelet Scattering and LSTM

    Liu F, Xia S, Wei S, Chen L, Ren Y, Ren X, et al. Wearable Electrocardiogram Quality Assessment Using Wavelet Scattering and LSTM. Front Physiol. 2022 June 30;13:905447

    2022

  69. [79]

    one -size-fits-most

    Straczkiewicz M, Huang EJ, Onnela JP. A “one -size-fits-most” walking recognition method for smartphones, smartwatches, and wearable accelerometers. Npj Digit Med. 2023 Feb 23;6(1):29

    2023

  70. [80]

    Prognostic Significance of Quantitative QRS Duration

    Desai AD, Yaw TS, Yamazaki T, Kaykha A, Chun S, Froelicher VF. Prognostic Significance of Quantitative QRS Duration. Am J Med. 2006 July;119(7):600–6

    2006

  71. [81]

    Duration of QRS Complex in Resting Electrocardiogram Is a Predictor of Sudden Cardiac Death in Men

    Kurl S, Mäkikallio TH, Rautaharju P, Kiviniemi V, Laukkanen JA. Duration of QRS Complex in Resting Electrocardiogram Is a Predictor of Sudden Cardiac Death in Men. Circulation. 2012 May 29;125(21):2588–94

    2012

  72. [82]

    Electrocardiographic PR Interval and Adverse Outcomes in Older Adults: The Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study

    Magnani JW, Wang N, Nelson KP, Connelly S, Deo R, Rodondi N, et al. Electrocardiographic PR Interval and Adverse Outcomes in Older Adults: The Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013 Feb;6(1):84–90

    2013

  73. [83]

    Characteristics of PR interval as predictor for atrial fibrillation: association with biomarkers and outcomes

    Schumacher K, Dagres N, Hindricks G, Husser D, Bollmann A, Kornej J. Characteristics of PR interval as predictor for atrial fibrillation: association with biomarkers and outcomes. Clin Res Cardiol. 2017 Oct;106(10):767–75

    2017

  74. [84]

    Physiology -Informed ECG Delineation Based on Peak Prominence

    Emrich J, Gargano A, Koka T, Muma M. Physiology -Informed ECG Delineation Based on Peak Prominence. In: 2024 32nd European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) [Internet]. Lyon, France: IEEE; 2024 [cited 2025 Sept 16]. p. 1402 –6. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/...

    2024

  75. [85]

    Performance And Accuracy Of A Smart Watch Single- lead ECG: A Pilot Study [Internet]

    Harmon D, L Dugan J, Carter R, Kashou A, Friedman P, Zachi Attia A. Performance And Accuracy Of A Smart Watch Single- lead ECG: A Pilot Study [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 Sept 19]. Available from: https://www.morressier.com/article/6261147764d859b4c3959586

    2022

  76. [86]

    Improving Automatic Smartwatch Electrocardiogram Diagnosis of Atrial Fibrillation by Identifying Regularity within Irregularity

    Velraeds A, Strik M, Van Der Zande J, Fontagne L, Haissaguerre M, Ploux S, et al. Improving Automatic Smartwatch Electrocardiogram Diagnosis of Atrial Fibrillation by Identifying Regularity within Irregularity. Sensors. 2023 Nov 20;23(22):9283

    2023

  77. [87]

    Towards Photoplethysmography-Based Estimation of Instantaneous Heart Rate During Physical Activity

    Jarchi D, Casson AJ. Towards Photoplethysmography-Based Estimation of Instantaneous Heart Rate During Physical Activity. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2017 Sept;64(9):2042–53

    2017

  78. [88]

    Heart rate variability: Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use

    Malik M, Bigger JT, Camm AJ, Kleiger RE, Malliani A, Moss AJ, et al. Heart rate variability: Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Eur Heart J. 1996 Mar 1;17(3):354–81

    1996

  79. [89]

    Adaptive notch -filtration to effectively recover photoplethysmographic signals during physical activity

    Zheng X, Dwyer VM, Barrett LA, Derakhshani M, Hu S. Adaptive notch -filtration to effectively recover photoplethysmographic signals during physical activity. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2022 Feb;72:103303

    2022

  80. [90]

    Emerging sensing and modeling technologies for wearable and cuffless blood pressure monitoring

    Zhao L, Liang C, Huang Y, Zhou G, Xiao Y, Ji N, et al. Emerging sensing and modeling technologies for wearable and cuffless blood pressure monitoring. Npj Digit Med. 2023 May 22;6(1):93

    2023

  81. [91]

    Effect of change in body position on resting 12-lead ECG

    Subramanian A, et al. Effect of change in body position on resting 12-lead ECG. Natl J Clin Anat. 2016;5(2):65–70

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.