Non-parametric Causal Inference in Dynamic Thresholding Designs
read the original abstract
We consider causal inference in dynamic settings where treatment is assigned by thresholding a state variable that can change over time. There is a large literature on regression-discontinuity methods building on the fact that, in the static setting, treatment assignment via threshold crossing induces a quasi-experimental design that enables pragmatic causal inference. But dynamic settings involve challenges not present in the static setting, e.g., past treatments may affect current state and thus future treatments, and so existing regression-discontinuity methods do not apply. Here, we show that dynamic thresholding designs identify a marginal policy effect that nests the classical regression-discontinuity parameter in the static setting; and propose a tailored local linear regression estimator that is consistent for this marginal policy effect. We demonstrate our approach using an experiment that emulates real-world optimization of thresholds for continuous glucose monitoring using data generated from an FDA-approved simulator.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Estimating Dynamic Marginal Policy Effects under Sequential Unconfoundedness
Dynamic marginal policy effects can be identified through reduced-form expressions and estimated with a doubly robust method under sequential unconfoundedness, avoiding full state observation and curse of horizon.
-
Estimating Dynamic Marginal Policy Effects under Sequential Unconfoundedness
Develops tractable reduced-form identification and a doubly robust estimator for dynamic marginal policy effects that avoids full state observation and exponential horizon curse.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.