pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.11203 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-16 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Little Red Dots as Hidden Neutrino Sources

Riku Kuze , Kunihito Ioka , Kohta Murase , Shigeo S. Kimura , Kohei Inayoshi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 13:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords Little Red Dotsneutrino sourcesphotomeson productiondiffuse neutrino backgroundhigh-redshift galaxiesblack hole outflowsflavor ratio
0
0 comments X

The pith

Little Red Dots can contribute about 30% of the diffuse neutrino background at TeV-sub-PeV energies.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Little Red Dots are compact high-redshift galaxies that host accreting supermassive black holes in dense gaseous envelopes. The paper proposes that relativistic jets from these black holes escape through low-density polar funnels, enabling particle acceleration and neutrino production via photohadronic processes. Analytic and numerical calculations show that in an optimistic scenario these sources can account for roughly 30% of the observed diffuse neutrino background in the TeV to sub-PeV range. This makes LRDs a population of hidden neutrino sources consistent with their number density and luminosity. At higher energies above 10^{5.5} GeV, inverse-Compton cooling of muons leads to a modified neutrino flavor ratio that serves as a diagnostic for future telescopes.

Core claim

The authors consider that relativistic jets and outflows are launched from the black hole and propagate through low-density polar funnels within envelopes, where particle acceleration and neutrino emission occur. This leads to LRDs being effectively hidden sources. Their analytic and numerical calculations show that, in an optimistic scenario, LRDs can contribute ∼30% of the observed diffuse background at TeV−sub-PeV energies, predominantly through photomeson production. At high neutrino energies, ≳10^{5.5} GeV, inverse-Compton cooling of muons modifies the resulting flavor ratio, providing a distinctive diagnostic for IceCube-Gen2 and other upcoming neutrino telescopes.

What carries the argument

The black hole in a dense gaseous envelope launching relativistic jets through low-density polar funnels for photomeson neutrino production.

If this is right

  • LRDs represent a new class of hidden sources contributing substantially to the diffuse neutrino flux.
  • Photomeson production dominates the neutrino generation in these objects.
  • The neutrino flavor ratio deviates from the standard 1:1:1 at energies above 10^{5.5} GeV due to muon cooling.
  • This contribution is compatible with the observed source density and energetics of LRDs.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If LRDs are confirmed as neutrino sources, it would suggest that many high-energy neutrinos come from obscured environments at cosmic noon.
  • Stacking analyses on LRD catalogs could reveal a neutrino signal even without individual detections.
  • The model may extend to other types of AGN with similar envelope structures at different redshifts.

Load-bearing premise

Relativistic jets and outflows are launched from the black hole and propagate through low-density polar funnels within the envelopes without being quenched by the dense gas.

What would settle it

Non-observation of the predicted flavor ratio modification at energies above 10^{5.5} GeV in data from IceCube-Gen2 or a measured contribution from LRDs much lower than 30% of the background.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.11203 by Kohei Inayoshi, Kohta Murase, Kunihito Ioka, Riku Kuze, Shigeo S. Kimura.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Rescaled population–luminosity diagram in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Schematic image of the BH-envelope-jet system con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Acceleration and loss rates at the dissipation region [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Comoving spectral luminosities [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Redshift-differential diffuse neutrino intensity from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Comparison of the redshift evolution of the key quantities in the LRD scenario. (a) Comoving number densities of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Little Red Dots (LRDs) are enigmatic, compact, red galaxies at high redshift, $z\sim 4$-$7$, discovered by the James Webb Space Telescope. Broad emission lines in the absence of X-ray and radio counterparts suggest that they host accreting supermassive black holes embedded in dense gaseous envelopes. This black-hole-envelope configuration facilitates efficient photohadronic interactions and neutrino production. Remarkably, their observed source number density and luminosity are compatible with the energetics of the diffuse neutrino background. We consider that relativistic jets and outflows are launched from the black hole and propagate through low-density polar funnels within envelopes, where particle acceleration and neutrino emission occur. This leads to LRDs being effectively hidden sources. Our analytic and numerical calculations show that, in an optimistic scenario, LRDs can contribute $\sim 30\%$ of the observed diffuse background at TeV$-$sub-PeV energies, predominantly through photomeson production. At high neutrino energies, $\gtrsim 10^{5.5}~{\rm GeV}$, inverse-Compton cooling of muons modifies the resulting flavor ratio, providing a distinctive diagnostic for IceCube-Gen2 and other upcoming neutrino telescopes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript argues that Little Red Dots (LRDs) at z∼4–7, which host accreting supermassive black holes embedded in dense gaseous envelopes, act as hidden neutrino sources. Relativistic jets and outflows are assumed to propagate through low-density polar funnels, enabling efficient photomeson production; analytic and numerical calculations then show that, under optimistic assumptions on jet power and envelope density, LRDs can account for ∼30% of the observed diffuse neutrino background at TeV–sub-PeV energies, with inverse-Compton muon cooling altering the flavor ratio above ∼10^{5.5} GeV as a potential diagnostic for IceCube-Gen2.

Significance. If the modeling holds, the result would identify a new population of high-redshift neutrino sources whose number density and luminosity, taken from JWST observations, match the energetics of the diffuse flux. It supplies a concrete, falsifiable prediction (modified flavor ratio at high energies) and applies standard photohadronic efficiencies to an externally observed source class rather than fitting the neutrino background directly.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the ∼30% contribution is obtained only in an 'optimistic scenario' whose jet power, envelope density, and photomeson optical-depth parameters are not enumerated, nor is any error propagation or sensitivity scan presented; the quantitative claim therefore rests on unverified modeling choices whose variation could change the fraction by more than an order of magnitude.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract and modeling description: the assumption that relativistic jets launch from the central black hole and propagate efficiently through low-density polar funnels without being quenched by the dense envelope is introduced without supporting simulation, analytic justification, or reference to an independent observable; the reported absence of X-ray and radio counterparts in LRDs already suggests either absent or heavily obscured jets, creating a direct tension with the requirement for powerful, unquenched jets.
  3. [Calculations] Calculations section: no robustness checks against modest increases in funnel density or jet-head stalling are shown; if the funnel column density is only modestly higher than assumed, the photomeson optical depth collapses and the predicted neutrino flux drops sharply, undermining the 30% figure.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the energy range is written 'TeV−sub-PeV'; standardize to 'TeV–sub-PeV' for typographic consistency.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments on our manuscript. These have highlighted important areas for clarification and strengthening of the quantitative claims. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the ∼30% contribution is obtained only in an 'optimistic scenario' whose jet power, envelope density, and photomeson optical-depth parameters are not enumerated, nor is any error propagation or sensitivity scan presented; the quantitative claim therefore rests on unverified modeling choices whose variation could change the fraction by more than an order of magnitude.

    Authors: We agree that the parameters underlying the optimistic scenario must be explicitly enumerated and that a sensitivity analysis is required to substantiate the ∼30% contribution. In the revised manuscript we will list the fiducial values (jet power L_j = 10^{45} erg s^{-1}, envelope density n_env = 10^{10} cm^{-3}, photomeson optical depth τ_{pγ} ≈ 5) together with the ranges explored. We will add a dedicated sensitivity scan (new figure or table) showing how the diffuse neutrino flux fraction varies with these parameters, confirming that the 30% figure corresponds to the upper end of observationally allowed values while lower contributions result from more conservative choices. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and modeling description: the assumption that relativistic jets launch from the central black hole and propagate efficiently through low-density polar funnels without being quenched by the dense envelope is introduced without supporting simulation, analytic justification, or reference to an independent observable; the reported absence of X-ray and radio counterparts in LRDs already suggests either absent or heavily obscured jets, creating a direct tension with the requirement for powerful, unquenched jets.

    Authors: The lack of X-ray and radio counterparts is fully consistent with our hidden-source picture, as the dense equatorial envelope provides strong obscuration while the polar funnels remain low-density channels. We will expand the modeling section with analytic justification based on the expected density contrast (funnel density lower by 2–3 orders of magnitude due to radiation-pressure clearing) and will cite hydrodynamic simulations of jet propagation through AGN tori that demonstrate relativistic jets can remain unquenched in such low-column-density funnels. While we cannot perform new dedicated simulations within the scope of this paper, the absence of electromagnetic counterparts supports rather than contradicts the scenario, as neutrinos escape unattenuated. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Calculations] Calculations section: no robustness checks against modest increases in funnel density or jet-head stalling are shown; if the funnel column density is only modestly higher than assumed, the photomeson optical depth collapses and the predicted neutrino flux drops sharply, undermining the 30% figure.

    Authors: We will add explicit robustness checks to the Calculations section. We will recompute the photomeson optical depth and neutrino flux for funnel column densities increased by factors of 2 and 5 relative to the fiducial value, and we will include a brief discussion of jet-head stalling criteria. These checks will show that the neutrino output remains significant provided the funnel column stays below ∼10^{22} cm^{-2}, a regime consistent with the observed properties of LRDs; only substantially higher densities (not favored by current data) would suppress the flux sharply. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; forward calculation from external JWST observations of LRD density and luminosity

full rationale

The paper computes the ~30% contribution using observed LRD number density and luminosity (from JWST) multiplied by standard photomeson efficiencies under an optimistic jet-funnel scenario. No neutrino-background data are used to fit parameters, no self-citations supply the core flux scaling, and the result is not equivalent to the inputs by construction. The derivation remains a standard forward model from independent astronomical inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Model rests on standard high-energy astrophysics assumptions for photohadronic interactions in AGN-like environments, applied to LRDs with optimistic jet propagation parameters chosen to match the target neutrino flux fraction.

free parameters (1)
  • jet power and envelope density parameters
    Optimistic values selected to reach the reported 30% contribution; exact numerical values not stated in abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Photohadronic interactions in dense gaseous envelopes efficiently produce neutrinos from accelerated protons in jets
    Standard assumption in neutrino astrophysics invoked to enable the production mechanism.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5528 in / 1266 out tokens · 44387 ms · 2026-05-16T13:38:03.720342+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Ultrahigh-energy cosmogenic neutrino emissions in the high-redshift universe

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    High-redshift AGN emitting UHE protons up to 10^19 eV generate a 50 PeV cosmogenic neutrino bump consistent with IceCube data from their JWST-measured average properties without fine-tuning.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

123 extracted references · 123 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 55 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    hidden neutrino sources

    will test this prediction and may determine whether the diffuse neutrino background is primarily powered by radio-quiet AGN or by LRDs by identifying this energy- dependent feature [see e.g., 112]. C. LRD environment compared with AGN jets The physical setup considered in this work is close to AGNjetsystems, buttheroleofthesurroundingmedium makes the LRD ...

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    Harikane, Y

    Y. Harikane, Y. Zhang, K. Nakajima, M. Ouchi, Y. Isobe, Y. Ono, S. Hatano, Y. Xu, and H. Umeda, ApJ959, 39 (2023), arXiv:2303.11946 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    D. D. Kocevskiet al., ApJ954, L4 (2023), 17 arXiv:2302.00012 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    Little Red Dots: An Abundant Population of Faint Active Galactic Nuclei at z∼5 Revealed by the EIGER and FRESCO JWST Surveys,

    J. Mattheeet al., ApJ963, 129 (2024), arXiv:2306.05448 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    D. D. Kocevskiet al., arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2404.03576 (2024), arXiv:2404.03576 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    H.B.Akinset al.,ApJ991,37(2025),arXiv:2406.10341 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Labbeet al., ApJ978, 92 (2025), arXiv:2306.07320 [astro-ph.GA]

    I. Labbeet al., ApJ978, 92 (2025), arXiv:2306.07320 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    I. D. McGreer, X. Fan, L. Jiang, and Z. Cai, AJ155, 131 (2018), arXiv:1710.09390 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  9. [9]

    Matsuokaet al., ApJ869, 150 (2018), arXiv:1811.01963 [astro-ph.GA]

    Y. Matsuokaet al., ApJ869, 150 (2018), arXiv:1811.01963 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2018

  10. [10]

    Niidaet al., ApJ904, 89 (2020), arXiv:2010.00481 [astro-ph.GA]

    M. Niidaet al., ApJ904, 89 (2020), arXiv:2010.00481 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2020

  11. [11]

    Matsuokaet al., ApJ949, L42 (2023), arXiv:2305.11225 [astro-ph.GA]

    Y. Matsuokaet al., ApJ949, L42 (2023), arXiv:2305.11225 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2023

  12. [12]

    Inayoshi and L

    K. Inayoshi and L. C. Ho, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2512.03130 (2025), arXiv:2512.03130 [astro- ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    J. E. Greeneet al., ApJ964, 39 (2024), arXiv:2309.05714 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    Yue, A.-C

    M. Yue, A.-C. Eilers, T. T. Ananna, C. Pana- giotou, E. Kara, and T. Miyaji, ApJ974, L26 (2024), arXiv:2404.13290 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    T. T. Ananna, Á. Bogdán, O. E. Kovács, P. Natara- jan, and R. C. Hickox, ApJ969, L18 (2024), arXiv:2404.19010 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Linet al., ApJ974, 147 (2024), arXiv:2407.17570 [astro-ph.GA]

    X. Linet al., ApJ974, 147 (2024), arXiv:2407.17570 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    A. J. Tayloret al., ApJ986, 165 (2025), arXiv:2409.06772 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.08039, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.08039

    X. Linet al., ApJ996, 93 (2026), arXiv:2504.08039 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2026

  19. [19]

    N. I. Shakura and R. A. Sunyaev, A&A24, 337 (1973)

    work page 1973

  20. [20]

    R. D. Blandford and M. C. Begelman, MNRAS303, L1 (1999), astro-ph/9809083

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  21. [21]

    R. D. Blandford and M. C. Begelman, MNRAS349, 68 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0306184 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  22. [22]

    Super-critical Accretion Flows around Black Holes: Two-dimensional, Radiation-pressure-dominated Disks with Photon-trapping

    K. Ohsuga, M. Mori, T. Nakamoto, and S. Mineshige, ApJ628, 368 (2005), astro-ph/0504168

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  23. [23]

    Global Structure of Three Distinct Accretion Flows and Outflows around Black Holes through Two-Dimensional Radiation-Magnetohydrodynamic Simulations

    K. Ohsuga and S. Mineshige, ApJ736, 2 (2011), arXiv:1105.5474 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  24. [24]

    Radiation Magneto-hydrodynamic Simulations of the Formation of Hot Accretion Disk Coronae

    Y.-F. Jiang, J. M. Stone, and S. W. Davis, Astrophys. J.784, 169 (2014), arXiv:1402.2979 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  25. [25]

    Numerical simulations of super-critical black hole accretion flows in general relativity

    A. Sądowski, R. Narayan, J. C. McKinney, and A. Tchekhovskoy, MNRAS439, 503 (2014), arXiv:1311.5900 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  26. [26]

    Global simulations of axisymmetric radiative black hole accretion disks in general relativity with a sub-grid magnetic dynamo

    A. Sądowski, R. Narayan, A. Tchekhovskoy, D. Abarca, Y. Zhu, and J. C. McKinney, MNRAS447, 49 (2015), arXiv:1407.4421 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  27. [27]

    Hyper-Eddington accretion flows onto massive black holes

    K. Inayoshi, Z. Haiman, and J. P. Ostriker, MNRAS 459, 3738 (2016), arXiv:1511.02116 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  28. [28]

    D. Kido, K. Ioka, K. Hotokezaka, K. Inayoshi, and C. M. Irwin, MNRAS 10.1093/mnras/staf1898 (2025), arXiv:2505.06965 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1898 2025

  29. [29]

    The Emergence of Little Red Dots from Binary Massive Black Holes

    K. Inayoshi, J. Shangguan, X. Chen, L. C. Ho, and Z. Haiman, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2505.05322 (2025), arXiv:2505.05322 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    V. S. Berezinsky, inProc. 7th Int. Conf. Neutrino-77, Vol. 1 (USSR, 1977) p. 177

    work page 1977

  31. [31]

    V. S. Berezinskii and V. L. Ginzburg, MNRAS194, 3 (1981)

    work page 1981

  32. [32]

    M. G. Aartsenet al.(Icecube Collaboration), ApJ833, 3 (2016), arXiv:1607.08006 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  33. [33]

    Differential limit on the extremely-high-energy cosmic neutrino flux in the presence of astrophysical background from nine years of IceCube data

    M. Aartsenet al.(IceCube Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D98, 062003 (2018), arXiv:1807.01820 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  34. [34]

    Stettner, in36th International Cosmic Ray Confer- ence (ICRC2019), International Cosmic Ray Confer- ence, Vol

    J. Stettner, in36th International Cosmic Ray Confer- ence (ICRC2019), International Cosmic Ray Confer- ence, Vol. 36 (2019) p. 1017, arXiv:1908.09551 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2019

  35. [35]

    Abbasiet al.(IceCube), Phys

    R. Abbasiet al.(Icecube Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 110, 022001 (2024), arXiv:2402.18026 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    Improved measurements of the TeV-PeV extragalactic neutrino spectrum from joint analyses of IceCube tracks and cascades

    R. Abbasiet al., arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2507.22234 (2025), arXiv:2507.22234 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Hidden Cosmic-Ray Accelerators as an Origin of TeV-PeV Cosmic Neutrinos

    K. Murase, D. Guetta, and M. Ahlers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 071101 (2016), arXiv:1509.00805 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  38. [38]

    D. Xiao, P. Mészáros, K. Murase, and Z.-G. Dai, ApJ 826, 133 (2016), arXiv:1604.08131 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  39. [39]

    Evidence against star-forming galaxies as the dominant source of IceCube neutrinos

    K. Bechtol, M. Ahlers, M. Di Mauro, M. Ajello, and J. Vandenbroucke, ApJ836, 47 (2017), arXiv:1511.00688 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  40. [40]

    The Origin of the Extragalactic Gamma-Ray Background and Implications for Dark-Matter Annihilation

    M. Ajello, D. Gasparrini, M. Sánchez-Conde, G. Zahar- ijas, M. Gustafsson, J. Cohen-Tanugi, C. D. Dermer, Y. Inoue, D. Hartmann, M. Ackermann, K. Bechtol, A. Franckowiak, A. Reimer, R. W. Romani, and A. W. Strong, ApJ800, L27 (2015), arXiv:1501.05301 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  41. [41]

    Constraining High-Energy Cosmic Neutrino Sources: Implications and Prospects

    K. Murase and E. Waxman, Phys. Rev.D94, 103006 (2016), arXiv:1607.01601 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  42. [42]

    Murase and F

    K. Murase and F. W. Stecker, inThe Encyclopedia of Cosmology. Set 2: Frontiers in Cosmology. Volume 2: Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics, edited by F. W. Stecker (2023) pp. 483–540

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    High-Energy Neutrino Flares From X-Ray Bright and Dark Tidal Disruptions Events

    N. Senno, K. Murase, and P. Mészáros, ApJ838, 3 (2017), arXiv:1612.00918 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  44. [44]

    Murase, S

    K. Murase, S. S. Kimura, B. T. Zhang, F. Oikonomou, and M. Petropoulou, Astrophys. J.902, 108 (2020), arXiv:2005.08937 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  45. [45]

    Mukhopadhyay, M

    M. Mukhopadhyay, M. Bhattacharya, and K. Murase, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.534, 1528 (2024), arXiv:2309.02275 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Gamma Ray Bursts from the First Stars: Neutrino Signals

    R. Schneider, D. Guetta, and A. Ferrara, MNRAS334, 173 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0201342 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  47. [47]

    High Energy neutrino signals from the Epoch of Reionization

    F. Iocco, K. Murase, S. Nagataki, and P. D. Serpico, Astrophys. J.675, 937 (2008), arXiv:0707.0515 [astro- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  48. [48]

    UHE neutrinos from Pop III stars: concept and constraints

    V. Berezinsky and P. Blasi, Phys. Rev. D85, 123003 (2012), arXiv:1111.5461 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  49. [49]

    Quasi-star jets as unidentified gamma-ray sources

    B. Czerny, A. Janiuk, M. Sikora, and J.-P. Lasota, ApJ 755, L15 (2012), arXiv:1207.1560 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  50. [50]

    B. T. Zhang and K. Murase, MNRAS524, 76 (2023), arXiv:2302.14048 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  51. [51]

    Y.-J. Wei, K. Murase, and B. T. Zhang, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2512.23231 (2025), arXiv:2512.23231 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    Particle Acceleration in Relativistic Magnetized Collisionless Pair Shocks: Dependence of Shock Acceleration on Magnetic Obliquity

    L. Sironi and A. Spitkovsky, ApJ698, 1523 (2009), arXiv:0901.2578 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  53. [53]

    The Maximum Energy of Accelerated Particles in Relativistic Collisionless Shocks

    L. Sironi, A. Spitkovsky, and J. Arons, ApJ771, 54 (2013), arXiv:1301.5333 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  54. [54]

    Simulations of Ion Acceleration at Non-relativistic Shocks. I. Acceleration Efficiency

    D. Caprioli and A. Spitkovsky, ApJ783, 91 (2014), arXiv:1310.2943 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  55. [55]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.05537, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.05537 23

    K. Inayoshi, ApJ988, L22 (2025), arXiv:2503.05537 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    T. S. Tanakaet al., arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2508.00057 (2025), arXiv:2508.00057 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    Kokorev, K

    V. Kokorev, K. I. Caputi, J. E. Greene, P. Dayal, M. Trebitsch, S. E. Cutler, S. Fujimoto, I. Labbé, T. B. 18 Miller, E. Iani, R. Navarro-Carrera, and P. Rinaldi, ApJ 968, 38 (2024), arXiv:2401.09981 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2024

  58. [58]

    Carranza-Escuderoet al., ApJ989, L50 (2025), arXiv:2506.04004 [astro-ph.GA]

    M. Carranza-Escuderoet al., ApJ989, L50 (2025), arXiv:2506.04004 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    Grant, M

    D. Grant, M. Ackermann, A. Karle, and M. Kowalski, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 51 (2019) p. 288, arXiv:1911.02561 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2019

  60. [60]

    Pinpointing Extragalactic Neutrino Sources in Light of Recent IceCube Observations

    M. Ahlers and F. Halzen, Phys. Rev. D90, 043005 (2014), arXiv:1406.2160 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  61. [61]

    Testing the Hadronuclear Origin of PeV Neutrinos Observed with IceCube

    K. Murase, M. Ahlers, and B. C. Lacki, Phys. Rev. D 88, 121301 (2013), arXiv:1306.3417 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  62. [62]

    C. Yuan, K. Murase, and P. Mészáros, ApJ890, 25 (2020), arXiv:1904.06371 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  63. [63]

    High Energy Neutrinos from Astrophysical Sources: An Upper Bound

    E. Waxman and J. Bahcall, Phys. Rev. D59, 023002 (1999), hep-ph/9807282

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  64. [64]

    G. J. Feldman and R. D. Cousins, Phys. Rev. D57, 3873 (1998), arXiv:physics/9711021 [physics.data-an]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  65. [65]

    M. G. Aartsenet al., arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1510.05222 (2015), arXiv:1510.05222 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  66. [66]

    M. G. Aartsenet al.(IceCube-Gen2 Collaboration), JournalofPhysicsGNuclearPhysics48,060501(2021), arXiv:2008.04323 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  67. [67]

    Self-Similar Accretion Flows with Convection

    R. Narayan, I. V. Igumenshchev, and M. A. Abramow- icz, ApJ539, 798 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9912449 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  68. [68]

    Convection-Dominated Accretion Flows

    E. Quataert and A. Gruzinov, ApJ539, 809 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9912440 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  69. [69]

    Umeda, K

    H. Umeda, K. Inayoshi, Y. Harikane, and K. Murase, The Astrophysical Journal999, 183 (2026)

    work page 2026

  70. [70]

    TeV-PeV Neutrinos from Low-Power Gamma-Ray Burst Jets inside Stars

    K. Murase and K. Ioka, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 121102 (2013), arXiv:1306.2274 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  71. [71]

    Collapsar Jets, Bubbles and Fe Lines

    P. Mészáros and M. J. Rees, ApJ556, L37 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0104402

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  72. [72]

    Photon-conserving Comptonization in simulations of accretion disks around black holes

    A. Sądowski and R. Narayan, MNRAS454, 2372 (2015), arXiv:1508.04980 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  73. [73]

    Systematic two-dimensional radiation hydrodynamic simulations of super-Eddington accretion flow and outflow: Comparison with the slim disk model

    T. Kitaki, S. Mineshige, K. Ohsuga, and T. Kawashima, PASJ70, 108 (2018), arXiv:1809.01151 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  74. [74]

    Juodžbaliset al., MNRAS535, 853 (2024), arXiv:2407.08643 [astro-ph.GA]

    I. Juodžbaliset al., MNRAS535, 853 (2024), arXiv:2407.08643 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2024

  75. [75]

    M., Schneider, A

    G. Mazzolariet al., arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2412.04224 (2024), arXiv:2412.04224 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2024

  76. [76]

    Maiolinoet al., MNRAS538, 1921 (2025), arXiv:2405.00504 [astro-ph.GA]

    R. Maiolinoet al., MNRAS538, 1921 (2025), arXiv:2405.00504 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 1921

  77. [77]

    A. J. Gloudemans, K. J. Duncan, A.-C. Eilers, E. P. Farina, Y. Harikane, K. Inayoshi, E. Lambrides, and E. Vardoulaki, ApJ986, 130 (2025), arXiv:2501.04912 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2025

  78. [78]

    Perger, J

    K. Perger, J. Fogasy, S. Frey, and K. É. Gabányi, A&A 693, L2 (2025), arXiv:2411.19518 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2025

  79. [79]

    M. C. Begelman and D. F. Cioffi, ApJ345, L21 (1989)

    work page 1989

  80. [80]

    C. D. Matzner, MNRAS345, 575 (2003), arXiv:astro- ph/0203085 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2003

Showing first 80 references.