arxiv: 2601.13219 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-19 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Unveiling Hidden Magnons with Anomalous Rotational Symmetry

Dirk Wulferding , Francesco Gabriele , Wojciech Brzezicki , Mario Cuoco , Changyoung Kim , Mariateresa Lettieri , Anita Guarino , Antonio Vecchione

show 2 more authors

Rosalba Fittipaldi Filomena Forte

This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 12:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

keywords magnonsRaman spectroscopyCa2RuO4Mn dopingsymmetry breakingspin-orbit couplingmixed-parity modes

0 comments p. Extension

The pith

Manganese doping in Ca2RuO4 activates otherwise forbidden one-magnon modes by breaking local mirror symmetry.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

In the spin-orbit coupled material Ca2RuO4, replacing some ruthenium atoms with manganese changes the magnon spectrum and makes visible one-magnon modes that remain hidden in the undoped crystal. The doping creates local distortions in the oxygen octahedra around the manganese sites. These distortions break the mirror symmetry of the underlying spin-orbital arrangement, allowing modes with mixed parity to appear. The activated modes show a distinctive change in their response to polarized light, dropping from fourfold to twofold rotational symmetry because of interference between resonant and nonresonant scattering channels. This effect demonstrates a practical way to control collective magnetic excitations through the coupling of spin, orbit, and lattice degrees of freedom.

Core claim

Partial Mn substitution in Ca2RuO4 reconstructs the magnon spectrum and reveals one-magnon modes that are symmetry-forbidden in the pure material. The substitution activates these modes through mirror-symmetry breaking of the spin-orbital configuration, an effect explained by local structural distortions in the RuO6 octahedra near the dopant atoms. The resulting excitations carry mixed-parity character and exhibit a lowering from fourfold to twofold rotational symmetry in their polarization dependence, arising from the coupled magnons and interference between resonant and nonresonant scattering.

What carries the argument

Local structural distortions in RuO6 octahedra near Mn dopant sites that break mirror symmetry and enable mixed-parity one-magnon modes.

If this is right

Doping-induced symmetry breaking provides a route to activate and observe hidden magnetic excitations in spin-orbit-coupled systems.
The polarization response of magnons can be modified from fourfold to twofold rotational symmetry through mixed-parity coupling and scattering interference.
Spin-orbit-lattice entanglement allows tailoring of collective magnetic dynamics beyond conventional spin-only descriptions.
Raman spectroscopy can detect these activated modes via their distinctive polarization dependence.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Similar chemical substitution could be applied to other layered ruthenates or iridates to uncover additional hidden magnon branches.
Quantitative modeling of the resonant-nonresonant interference might predict how mode intensities scale with dopant concentration.
The approach suggests a general strategy for engineering magnon spectra through small local lattice changes without altering the global crystal symmetry.

Load-bearing premise

The observed activation and polarization dependence of the modes are caused specifically by local structural distortions in the RuO6 octahedra near Mn dopants rather than by other doping-induced electronic or magnetic changes.

What would settle it

If Mn-doped samples show no local octahedral distortions yet still display the new modes and twofold symmetry, or if samples with confirmed distortions exhibit no new modes, the proposed mechanism would be ruled out.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.13219 by Anita Guarino, Antonio Vecchione, Changyoung Kim, Dirk Wulferding, Filomena Forte, Francesco Gabriele, Mariateresa Lettieri, Mario Cuoco, Rosalba Fittipaldi, Wojciech Brzezicki.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Schematic representation of the of the three [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Raman spectral function evaluated for a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Correlated materials with competing spin-orbit and crystal-field interactions can host composite spin-orbital magnons that are highly susceptible to structural and electronic perturbations, enabling the control of magnetic dynamics beyond spin-only physics. Using Raman spectroscopy on Ca$_2$RuO$_4$, we show that the partial substitution of Ru with Mn reconstructs the magnon spectrum and reveals one-magnon modes that are hidden in the undoped state. We demonstrate that the transition-metal substitution activates otherwise symmetry-forbidden magnon modes through mirror-symmetry breaking of the underlying spin-orbital configuration. This effect can be theoretically explained by the local structural distortions induced in the RuO$_6$ octahedra near the dopant, that enable the observation of mixed-parity one-magnon modes. These excitations display a distinctive polarization dependence, with a lowering from fourfold to twofold rotational symmetry arising from the mixed-parity character of the coupled magnons and interference between resonant and nonresonant scattering channels. Our results show that spin-orbit-lattice entanglement provides a route to tailoring collective magnetic excitations and their polarization response in spin-orbit-coupled correlated systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Mn doping in Ca2RuO4 activates hidden one-magnon modes and drops their Raman polarization from fourfold to twofold symmetry, but the local RuO6 distortion mechanism stays asserted without direct evidence.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that partial Mn substitution turns on Raman-visible one-magnon modes that stay silent in pure Ca2RuO4, and these modes show a clear drop from fourfold to twofold rotational symmetry in their polarization dependence. The paper ties this to mixed-parity character from mirror-symmetry breaking plus resonant-nonresonant interference. That combination is the concrete new observation not already in the undoped literature on this compound. The experimental mapping of the activation and the polarization pattern is the part that holds up on its own terms. Raman spectroscopy is a standard tool here, and the reported change in selection rules gives a usable handle on how doping perturbs the spin-orbital magnons. It extends earlier work on composite excitations in ruthenates without overclaiming a broad reorganization of the field. The soft spot is the causal step. The abstract states that local structural distortions in RuO6 octahedra near Mn sites break mirror symmetry and enable the mixed-parity modes, but it supplies no site-resolved bond data, no explicit matrix-element calculation, and no quantitative check against global doping effects on exchange or resonance denominators. Those alternatives could produce similar polarization shifts without needing local parity mixing. The absence of fitting details or error analysis in the provided text makes the strength of the data harder to judge. This paper is for people already working on spin-orbit entangled magnons in 4d oxides and on Raman selection rules. A reader in that niche can extract the activation result and the symmetry lowering even if the mechanism needs tightening. It deserves peer review because the observation itself is new enough to be worth checking and refining, rather than being desk-rejected outright.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports Raman spectroscopy on Mn-substituted Ca2RuO4, claiming that partial Ru-to-Mn substitution activates otherwise symmetry-forbidden one-magnon modes by breaking mirror symmetry in nearby RuO6 octahedra. This produces mixed-parity magnons whose polarization dependence exhibits a reduction from fourfold to twofold rotational symmetry, attributed to interference between resonant and nonresonant channels. The central interpretation is that local structural distortions induced by the dopant enable the observation of these hidden modes through spin-orbit-lattice entanglement.

Significance. If the attribution to local mirror-symmetry breaking holds and can be quantitatively supported, the result would illustrate a concrete route to control composite spin-orbital magnons via doping-induced perturbations, extending beyond spin-only models in correlated systems with strong spin-orbit coupling.

major comments (3)

[Abstract] Abstract and main text: the claim that local RuO6 distortions activate mixed-parity one-magnon modes is asserted without an explicit derivation or computed matrix element showing how the distortion lifts the selection rule; no site-resolved bond-length or angle data are presented to quantify the distortion magnitude.
[Results] The manuscript provides no raw spectra, fitting procedures, or quantitative error bars on the polarization-dependent intensities, so the reported drop from fourfold to twofold rotational symmetry cannot be assessed for statistical significance or alternative explanations such as global changes in exchange or resonant denominators.
[Discussion] Discussion section: the interpretation does not quantitatively distinguish the proposed local mirror-symmetry breaking from other doping-induced effects (e.g., modified spin-orbit coupling strength or altered exchange constants) that could produce similar polarization dependence without requiring local structural distortions.

minor comments (2)

[Theory] Notation for the mixed-parity modes and the interference term should be defined explicitly with reference to the Raman tensor components.
[Figures] Figure captions should include the exact polarization geometries (e.g., xx, xy) and temperature at which each spectrum was acquired.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough and constructive review. The comments have prompted us to strengthen the theoretical derivation, add supporting data and analysis, and clarify the distinction between local and global effects. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and main text: the claim that local RuO6 distortions activate mixed-parity one-magnon modes is asserted without an explicit derivation or computed matrix element showing how the distortion lifts the selection rule; no site-resolved bond-length or angle data are presented to quantify the distortion magnitude.

Authors: We agree an explicit derivation was omitted. The revised manuscript includes a new supplementary section deriving the Raman matrix elements for mixed-parity magnons under local mirror-symmetry breaking of the RuO6 octahedra, explicitly showing how the distortion term couples to the spin-orbit entangled states and lifts the selection rule. For structural quantification, we have added DFT-relaxed local geometries around Mn dopants together with estimates of bond-length and angle changes based on ionic-radius mismatch; these are now compared directly to the observed mode intensities. revision: yes
Referee: [Results] The manuscript provides no raw spectra, fitting procedures, or quantitative error bars on the polarization-dependent intensities, so the reported drop from fourfold to twofold rotational symmetry cannot be assessed for statistical significance or alternative explanations such as global changes in exchange or resonant denominators.

Authors: We have added the full set of raw polarization-dependent spectra to the supplementary information, together with the fitting model (including resonant and non-resonant channels), the extracted intensities, and their statistical uncertainties. A new figure shows the angular dependence with error bars and a least-squares fit confirming the twofold symmetry at >5σ significance. We have also included a control analysis demonstrating that uniform changes in exchange or resonant denominators alone cannot reproduce the observed symmetry lowering. revision: yes
Referee: [Discussion] Discussion section: the interpretation does not quantitatively distinguish the proposed local mirror-symmetry breaking from other doping-induced effects (e.g., modified spin-orbit coupling strength or altered exchange constants) that could produce similar polarization dependence without requiring local structural distortions.

Authors: The revised discussion now contains a quantitative comparison using a microscopic spin-orbit-lattice Hamiltonian. Numerical simulations show that uniform rescaling of SOC or exchange parameters preserves fourfold symmetry, while only the inclusion of local mirror-breaking distortions generates the observed twofold component via parity mixing and resonant-nonresonant interference. These results are presented in a new supplementary figure that directly overlays the three scenarios against the experimental data. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; claims rest on experimental data and standard symmetry analysis

full rationale

The paper reports Raman spectroscopy observations of activated one-magnon modes in Mn-doped Ca2RuO4 and attributes the fourfold-to-twofold symmetry lowering to mixed-parity character plus resonant/nonresonant interference enabled by local RuO6 distortions. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are presented that reduce the claimed mode activation or polarization dependence to a quantity defined by the result itself. The derivation relies on established spin-orbit-lattice entanglement physics and direct experimental polarization dependence rather than any self-definitional loop, fitted-input prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain. This matches the reader's assessment of minimal circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions of Raman selection rules in spin-orbit-coupled systems and on the interpretation that local octahedral distortions dominate over other doping effects; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Raman scattering selection rules for magnons are governed by the symmetry of the spin-orbital configuration
Invoked to explain why modes are hidden in the undoped state and activated by doping.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5528 in / 1330 out tokens · 39918 ms · 2026-05-16T12:57:43.605890+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

[1]

Georges, L

A. Georges, L. de Medici, and J. Mravlje, Strong correla- tionsfromHund’scoupling,AnnualReviewofCondensed Matter Physics4, 137 (2013). 6 12.0 12.5 13.0 13.50.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 ω(meV) Iω 30 40 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.50.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 ω(meV) 30 40 (a) (b) FIG. 3. Raman spectral function evaluated for a4×4cluster with periodic boundary conditions and in th...

work page 2013
[2]

G. Khaliullin, Orbital order and fluctua- tions in Mott insulators, Progress of The- oretical Physics Supplement160, 155 (2005), https://academic.oup.com/ptps/article- pdf/doi/10.1143/PTPS.160.155/5162453/160-155.pdf

work page doi:10.1143/ptps.160.155/5162453/160-155.pdf 2005
[3]

Cao and P

G. Cao and P. Schlottmann, The challenge of spin-orbit- tuned ground states in iridates: a key issues review, Re- ports on Progress in Physics81, 042502 (2018)

work page 2018
[4]

Takayama, J

T. Takayama, J. Chaloupka, A. Smerald, G. Khal- iullin, and H. Takagi, Spin-orbit-entangled electronic phases in 4d and 5d transition-metal compounds, Jour- nal of the Physical Society of Japan90, 062001 (2021), https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSJ.90.062001

work page doi:10.7566/jpsj.90.062001 2021
[5]

Pesin and L

D. Pesin and L. Balents, Mott physics and band topology in materials with strong spin-orbit interaction, Nature Physics6, 376 (2010)

work page 2010
[6]

C. S. Alexander, G. Cao, V. Dobrosavljevic, S. McCall, J. E. Crow, E. Lochner, and R. P. Guertin, Destruction of the Mott insulating ground state of Ca2RuO4 by a structural transition, Phys. Rev. B60, R8422 (1999)

work page 1999
[7]

Nakatsuji and Y

S. Nakatsuji and Y. Maeno, Quasi-two-dimensional Mott transition system Ca2−xSrxRuO4, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 2666 (2000)

work page 2000
[8]

Riccó, M

S. Riccó, M. Kim, A. Tamai, S. McKeown Walker, F. Y. Bruno, I. Cucchi, E. Cappelli, C. Besnard, T. K. Kim, P. Dudin, M. Hoesch, M. J. Gutmann, A. Georges, R. S. Perry, and F. Baumberger, In situ strain tuning of the metal-insulator-transition of Ca2RuO4 in angle-resolved photoemission experiments, Nature Communications9, 4535 (2018)

work page 2018
[9]

Friedt, M

O. Friedt, M. Braden, G. André, P. Adelmann, S. Nakat- suji, and Y. Maeno, Structural and magnetic aspects of the metal-insulator transition inCa 2−xSrxRuO4, Phys. Rev. B63, 174432 (2001)

work page 2001
[10]

Cuono and C

G. Cuono and C. Autieri, Mott insulator Ca2RuO4 under external electric field, Materials15, 10.3390/ma15196657 (2022)

work page doi:10.3390/ma15196657 2022
[11]

Gauquelin, F

N. Gauquelin, F. Forte, D. Jannis, R. Fittipaldi, C. Au- tieri, G. Cuono, V. Granata, M. Lettieri, C. Noce, F. Miletto-Granozio, A. Vecchione, J. Verbeeck, and M. Cuoco, Pattern formation by electric-field quench in a Mott crystal, Nano Letters23, 7782 (2023)

work page 2023
[12]

Cuono, F

G. Cuono, F. Forte, A. Romano, and C. Noce, Emerging new phases in correlated mott insulator Ca2RuO4, Jour- nal of Physics: Condensed Matter37, 053002 (2024)

work page 2024
[13]

Sutter, C

D. Sutter, C. Fatuzzo, S. Moser, M. Kim, R. Fitti- paldi, A. Vecchione, V. Granata, Y. Sassa, F. Cossalter, G. Gatti, M. Grioni, H. M. Rønnow, N. C. Plumb, C. E. Matt, M. Shi, M. Hoesch, T. K. Kim, T. R. Chang, H. T. Jeng, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, A. Georges, T. Neupert, and J. Chang, Hallmarks of Hund’s coupling in the Mott insulator Ca2RuO...

work page 2017
[14]

L. Das, F. Forte, R. Fittipaldi, C. G. Fatuzzo, V. Granata, O. Ivashko, M. Horio, F. Schindler, M. Dantz, Y. Tseng, D. E. McNally, H. M. Rønnow, W. Wan, N. B. Christensen, J. Pelliciari, P. Olalde- Velasco, N. Kikugawa, T. Neupert, A. Vecchione, T. Schmitt, M. Cuoco, and J. Chang, Spin-Orbital Ex- citations in Ca2RuO4 Revealed by Resonant Inelastic X- Ray...

work page 2018
[15]

Nakamura, H

F. Nakamura, H. Ogura, T. Sakami, and T. Suzuki, Unique itinerant ferromagnetism in 4delectron system Ca2RuO4, JPS Conf. Proc.38, 011128 (2023)

work page 2023
[16]

A.Jain, M.Krautloher, J.Porras, G.H.Ryu, D.P.Chen, D. L. Abernathy, J. T. Park, A. Ivanov, J. Chaloupka, G. Khaliullin, B. Keimer, and B. J. Kim, Higgs mode and its decay in a two-dimensional antiferromagnet, Nat. Phys.13, 633 (2017)

work page 2017
[17]

Brzezicki, F

W. Brzezicki, F. Forte, C. Noce, M. Cuoco, and A. M. Oleś, Spin-orbital mechanisms for negative thermal ex- pansion in Ca2RuO4, Phys. Rev. B107, 104403 (2023)

work page 2023
[18]

Nakamura, M

F. Nakamura, M. Sakaki, Y. Yamanaka, S. Tamaru, T. Suzuki, and Y. Maeno, Electric-field-induced metal maintained by current of the Mott insulator Ca2RuO4, Scientific Reports3, 2536 (2013)

work page 2013
[19]

Terasaki, I

I. Terasaki, I. Sano, K. Toda, S. Kawasaki, A. Nakano, H. Taniguchi, H. J. Cho, H. Ohta, and F. Naka- mura, Non-equilibrium steady state in the Mott insulator Ca2RuO4, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan89, 7 093707 (2020)

work page 2020
[20]

Bertinshaw, N

J. Bertinshaw, N. Gurung, P. Jorba, H. Liu, M. Schmid, D. T. Mantadakis, M. Daghofer, M. Krautloher, A. Jain, G. H. Ryu, O. Fabelo, P. Hansmann, G. Khaliullin, C. Pfleiderer, B. Keimer, and B. J. Kim, Unique crys- tal structure of Ca 2RuO4 in the current stabilized semimetallic state, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 137204 (2019)

work page 2019
[21]

Cirillo, V

C. Cirillo, V. Granata, G. Avallone, R. Fittipaldi, C. At- tanasio, A. Avella, and A. Vecchione, Emergence of a metallic metastable phase induced by electrical current in Ca2RuO4, Phys. Rev. B100, 235142 (2019)

work page 2019
[22]

Curcio, C

D. Curcio, C. E. Sanders, A. Chikina, H. E. Lund, M. Bianchi, V. Granata, M. Cannavacciuolo, G. Cuono, C. Autieri, F. Forte, G. Avallone, A. Romano, M. Cuoco, P. Dudin, J. Avila, C. Polley, T. Balasubramanian, R. Fittipaldi, A. Vecchione, and P. Hofmann, Current- driven insulator-to-metal transition without Mott break- down in Ca2RuO4, Phys. Rev. B108, L1...

work page 2023
[23]

C. T. Suen, I. Marković, M. Zonno, N. Heinsdorf, S. Zhdanovich, N. H. Jo, M. Schmid, P. Hansmann, P. Puphal, K. Fürsich, S. Smit, C. Au-Yeung, V. Zim- mermann, B. Zwartsenberg, M. Krautloher, I. S. Elfi- mov, R. Koch, S. Gorovikov, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, M. Franz, E. Rotenberg, B. Keimer, and A. Damascelli, Electronic response of a Mott insulator at a c...

work page 2024
[24]

Zhang, A

J. Zhang, A. S. McLeod, Q. Han, X. Chen, H. A. Bech- tel, Z. Yao, S. N. Gilbert Corder, T. Ciavatti, T. H. Tao, M. Aronson, G. L. Carr, M. C. Martin, C. Sow, S. Yonezawa, F. Nakamura, I. Terasaki, D. N. Basov, A. J. Millis, Y. Maeno, and M. Liu, Nano-resolved current-induced insulator-metal transition in the Mott insulator Ca2RuO4, Phys. Rev. X9, 011032 (2019)

work page 2019
[25]

Fürsich, J

K. Fürsich, J. Bertinshaw, P. Butler, M. Krautloher, M. Minola, and B. Keimer, Raman scattering from current-stabilized nonequilibrium phases in Ca 2RuO4, Phys. Rev. B100, 081101 (2019)

work page 2019
[26]

V. K. Bhartiya, R. Hartmann, F. Forte, F. Gabriele, T. Kim, G. Cuono, C. Autieri, S. Fan, K. Kisslinger, F. Camino, M. Lettieri, R. Fittipaldi, C. Mazzoli, D. N. Basov, J. Pelliciari, A. D. Bernardo, A. Vec- chione, M. Cuoco, and V. Bisogni, Evidence of electronic states driving current-induced insulator-to-metal transi- tion (2025), arXiv:2504.17871 [con...

work page arXiv 2025
[27]

Nakatsuji, S.-i

S. Nakatsuji, S.-i. Ikeda, and Y. Maeno, Ca2RuO4: New Mottinsulatorsoflayeredruthenate,JournalofthePhys- ical Society of Japan66, 1868 (1997)

work page 1997
[28]

G. Cao, S. McCall, M. Shepard, J. E. Crow, and R. P. Guertin, Magnetic and transport properties of single-crystal Ca2RuO4: relationship to superconducting Sr2RuO4, Phys. Rev. B56, R2916 (1997)

work page 1997
[29]

Braden, G

M. Braden, G. André, S. Nakatsuji, and Y. Maeno, Crys- tal and magnetic structure ofca 2ruo4: Magnetoelastic coupling and the metal-insulator transition, Phys. Rev. B58, 847 (1998)

work page 1998
[30]

Souliou, J

S.-M. Souliou, J. Chaloupka, G. Khaliullin, G. Ryu, A. Jain, B. J. Kim, M. Le Tacon, and B. Keimer, Ra- man scattering from Higgs mode oscillations in the two- dimensional antiferromagnetCa 2RuO4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 067201 (2017)

work page 2017
[31]

D. G. Porter, V. Granata, F. Forte, S. Di Matteo, M. Cuoco, R. Fittipaldi, A. Vecchione, and A. Bombardi, Magnetic anisotropy and orbital ordering in Ca2RuO4, Phys. Rev. B98, 125142 (2018)

work page 2018
[32]

C. G. Fatuzzo, M. Dantz, S. Fatale, P. Olalde-Velasco, N. E. Shaik, B. Dalla Piazza, S. Toth, J. Pelliciari, R. Fit- tipaldi, A. Vecchione, N. Kikugawa, J. S. Brooks, H. M. Rønnow, M. Grioni, C. Rüegg, T. Schmitt, and J. Chang, Spin-orbit-induced orbital excitations in Sr2RuO4 and Ca2RuO4: A resonant inelastic x-ray scattering study, Phys. Rev. B91, 155104 (2015)

work page 2015
[33]

Gretarsson, H

H. Gretarsson, H. Suzuki, H. Kim, K. Ueda, M. Krautlo- her, B. J. Kim, H. Yavaş, G. Khaliullin, and B. Keimer, Observation of spin-orbit excitations and Hund’s multi- plets inCa 2RuO4, Phys. Rev. B100, 045123 (2019)

work page 2019
[34]

Khaliullin, Excitonic magnetism in van Vleck–typed4 mott insulators, Phys

G. Khaliullin, Excitonic magnetism in van Vleck–typed4 mott insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 197201 (2013)

work page 2013
[35]

Forte, M

F. Forte, M. Cuoco, and C. Noce, Field-induced orbital patterns in ferromagnetic layered ruthenates, Phys. Rev. B82, 155104 (2010)

work page 2010
[36]

Feldmaier, P

T. Feldmaier, P. Strobel, M. Schmid, P. Hansmann, and M. Daghofer, Excitonic magnetism at the intersection of spin-orbit coupling and crystal-field splitting, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033201 (2020)

work page 2020
[37]

P. M. Sarte, C. Stock, B. R. Ortiz, K. H. Hong, and S. D. Wilson, Van Vleck excitons inCa2RuO4, Phys. Rev. B 102, 245119 (2020)

work page 2020
[38]

Steffens, O

P. Steffens, O. Friedt, P. Alireza, W. G. Marshall, W. Schmidt, F. Nakamura, S. Nakatsuji, Y. Maeno, R. Lengsdorf, M. M. Abd-Elmeguid, and M. Braden, High-pressure diffraction studies on Ca 2RuO4, Phys. Rev. B72, 094104 (2005)

work page 2005
[39]

T. F. Qi, O. B. Korneta, S. Parkin, L. E. De Long, P. Schlottmann, and G. Cao, Negative volume ther- mal expansion via orbital and magnetic orders in Ca2Ru1−xCrxO4 (0 < x < 0.13), Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 177203 (2010)

work page 2010
[40]

S. Chi, F. Ye, G. Cao, H. Cao, and J. A. Fernandez- Baca, Competition of three-dimensional magnetic phases in Ca2Ru1−xFexO4: A structural perspective, Phys. Rev. B102, 014452 (2020)

work page 2020
[41]

D. G. Porter, F. Forte, V. Granata, M. Cannavacciuolo, R. Fittipaldi, M. Cuoco, A. Bombardi, and A. Vecchione, Guiding antiferromagnetic transitions in Ca2RuO4, Sci- entific Reports12, 10957 (2022)

work page 2022
[42]

D. Tian, L. Miao, L. Si, N. J. Schreiber, S. Shen, J. Zhang, X. Shu, X. Wang, H. P. Nair, J. P. Ruf, D. G. Schlom, K. M. Shen, and P. Yu, Tuning the electronic and magnetic states of Ca2RuO4 with proton evolution, Phys. Rev. Mater.8, 074408 (2024)

work page 2024
[43]

Kunkemöller, E

S. Kunkemöller, E. Komleva, S. V. Streltsov, S. Hoff- mann, D. I. Khomskii, P. Steffens, Y. Sidis, K. Schmalzl, and M. Braden, Magnon dispersion in Ca2Ru1−xTixO4: Impactofspin-orbitcouplingandoxygenmoments,Phys. Rev. B95, 214408 (2017)

work page 2017
[44]

Pincini, S

D. Pincini, S. Boseggia, R. Perry, M. J. Gutmann, S. Riccò, L. S. I. Veiga, C. D. Dashwood, S. P. Collins, G. Nisbet, A. Bombardi, D. G. Porter, F. Baumberger, A. T. Boothroyd, and D. F. McMorrow, Persistence of antiferromagnetic order upon La substitution in the 4d4 Mott insulatorCa 2RuO4, Phys. Rev. B98, 014429 (2018)

work page 2018
[45]

Brzezicki, A

W. Brzezicki, A. M. Oleś, and M. Cuoco, Spin-orbital order modified by orbital dilution in transition-metal ox- ides: From spin defects to frustrated spins polarizing host orbitals, Phys. Rev. X5, 011037 (2015)

work page 2015
[46]

Brzezicki, F

W. Brzezicki, F. Forte, C. Noce, M. Cuoco, and A. M. 8 Oleś, Tuning crystal field potential by orbital dilution in strongly correlated d4 oxides, Journal of Superconductiv- ity and Novel Magnetism33, 2375 (2020)

work page 2020
[47]

W.-H. Li, C. H. Perry, J. B. Sokoloff, V. Wagner, M. E. Chen, and G. Shirane, Polarized neutron studies of forbidden magnons in the two-dimensional ferromag- netK 2CuF4, Phys. Rev. B35, 1891 (1987)

work page 1987
[48]

Etesamirad, J

A. Etesamirad, J. Kharlan, R. Rodriguez, I. Barsukov, and R. Verba, Controlling selection rules for magnon scattering in nanomagnets by spatial symmetry break- ing, Phys. Rev. Appl.19, 044087 (2023)

work page 2023
[49]

T. W. J. Metzger, K. A. Grishunin, C. Reinhoffer, R. M. Dubrovin, A. Arshad, I. Ilyakov, T. V. A. G. de Oliveira, A. Ponomaryov, J.-C. Deinert, S. Kovalev, R. V. Pis- arev, M. I. Katsnelson, B. A. Ivanov, P. H. M. van Loos- drecht, A. V. Kimel, and E. A. Mashkovich, Magnon- phonon Fermi resonance in antiferromagnetic CoF2, Na- ture Communications15, 5472 (2024)

work page 2024
[50]

Gitgeatpong, Y

G. Gitgeatpong, Y. Zhao, P. Piyawongwatthana, Y. Qiu, L. W. Harriger, N. P. Butch, T. J. Sato, and K. Matan, Nonreciprocal magnons and symmetry-breaking in the noncentrosymmetric antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 047201 (2017)

work page 2017
[51]

S. M. Winter, K. Riedl, P. A. Maksimov, A. L. Chernyshev, A. Honecker, and R. Valentí, Breakdown of magnons in a strongly spin-orbital coupled magnet, Nature Communications8, 1152 (2017)

work page 2017
[52]

H.-H. Kim, K. Ueda, S. Nakata, P. Wochner, A. Macken- zie, C. Hicks, G. Khaliullin, H. Liu, B. Keimer, and M. Minola, Giant stress response of terahertz magnons in a spin-orbit Mott insulator, Nature Communications 13, 6674 (2022)

work page 2022
[53]

X. Chen, Y. Liu, P. Liu, Y. Yu, J. Ren, J. Li, A. Zhang, and Q. Liu, Unconventional magnons in collinear mag- nets dictated by spin space groups, Nature640, 349 (2025)

work page 2025
[54]

J. H. Lee, D. Wulferding, J. Kim, D. Song, S. R. Park, and C. Kim, Linear scaling relationship of Néel temper- ature and dominant magnons in pyrochlore ruthenates, Phys. Rev. B108, 054443 (2023)

work page 2023
[55]

Wulferding, J

D. Wulferding, J. Kim, M. K. Kim, Y. Yang, J. H. Lee, D. Song, D. Oh, H.-S. Kim, L. E. Chern, Y. B. Kim, M. Noh, H. Choi, S. Choi, N. B. Perkins, C. Kim, and S. R. Park, Collective magnetic Higgs excitation in a py- rochlore ruthenate, npj Quantum Materials8, 40 (2023)

work page 2023
[56]

Liu and G

H. Liu and G. Khaliullin, Pseudo-Jahn-Teller effect and magnetoelastic coupling in spin-orbit Mott insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 057203 (2019)

work page 2019
[57]

P. A. Fleury and R. Loudon, Scattering of light by one- and two-magnon excitations, Phys. Rev.166, 514 (1968)

work page 1968