pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.19866 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-27 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Discovery of Galactic center ejected star in DESI DR1

Manuel Cavieres , Sergey E. Koposov , Elena Maria Rossi , Zephyr Penoyre , Sill Verberne This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 10:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords hypervelocity starsGalactic CenterHills mechanismDESIGaiastellar orbitsMilky Way halo
0
0 comments X

The pith

A solar-mass star was ejected from the Galactic Center at 698 km/s via the Hills mechanism.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports the discovery of DESI-312, a candidate hypervelocity star identified in DESI DR1 spectroscopy combined with Gaia astrometry. Its six-dimensional kinematics allow backward integration of the orbit to an origin within the central 2 kpc of the Milky Way. The inferred ejection velocity of 698 km/s matches expectations for tidal acceleration by the central supermassive black hole. The star shows supersolar metallicity and, at roughly 1 solar mass on the main sequence, permits detailed atmospheric analysis that can reveal the chemical makeup of the obscured central regions. Disk or cluster ejection scenarios are ruled out by the combination of trajectory and composition.

Core claim

We identified a compelling candidate, DESI-312, whose bound trajectory can be confidently traced back to the central 2 kpc of our galaxy. Its inferred GC ejection velocity of 698 km/s is consistent with a Hills mechanism ejection. The star exhibits supersolar metallicity and as a 1 solar mass star enables detailed chemical analysis of its atmosphere, offering a window into the composition of the central regions of the Galaxy.

What carries the argument

Six-dimensional kinematic search that combines DESI radial velocities with Gaia positions and proper motions, followed by backward orbit integration in a Galactic potential to locate the origin and compute ejection speed.

Load-bearing premise

The adopted Galactic potential model and measured proper motions correctly place the integrated origin inside the central 2 kpc.

What would settle it

Higher-precision astrometry or a revised Galactic potential that shifts the backward-integrated origin outside the central 2 kpc or permits a disk-ejection path would falsify the claimed Galactic Center origin.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.19866 by Elena Maria Rossi, Manuel Cavieres, Sergey E. Koposov, Sill Verberne, Zephyr Penoyre.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Fraction of realizations (out of 1,000 total) whose first Galactic￾plane crossing falls within a 1 kpc -radius circle around the GC, shown as a function of [Fe/H] for DESI candidates. S5-HVS1 is overplotted in orange for reference (Koposov et al. 2020). The only candidate found, star DESI-312, is shown in red. integration. We adopted the Price-Whelan 2017 potential, which corresponds to a porting of Gala (… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Article number, page 3 of 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Comparison between the best-fitting model spectrum (red) and the observed DESI spectra (black) for DESI-312, both provided as part of the first data release of the DESI stellar catalogue (Koposov et al. 2025). From top to bottom, the panels show the red, blue, and z arms of the spectra. The close agreement between model and data gives no suggestion of a problematic fit or unreliable atmospheric parameters.… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Corner plot of the posterior distributions for stellar mass M⋆, log10(Age/yr), [Fe/H], distance d, and reddening E(B−V). Green contours are from the photometry-only fit; blue contours include photometry and the DESI rvspecfit measurements of Teff and log g. Contours indicate the 68%, 95%, and 99.7% credible regions; diagonal panels show the corresponding 1D marginalized posteriors. Titles show the median a… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Hertzsprung–Russell diagram of DESI-312. The orange curves show 1000 samples from the posterior of the spectro-photometric model (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Galactic plane crossing locations for DESI-312, considering all crossings that can take place within the lifetime of the star. The 1σ and 2σ corresponding to regions containing the 68th and 95th percentiles of plane crossings are shown with a continuous and dashed line, respec￾tively. The solar circle is shown in orange for reference. 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Ejection velocity [km/s] 0.000 0.001 0.002 0… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Example orbit of DESI-312 integrated over the median lifetime in the XZ (top) and XY plane (bottom), in the Galactic Cartesian coor￾dinate system, colured by the relative time with 0 being the current ob￾served position of the star. The orbit is backward integrated for 8.05 Gyr, given by the median on the age posterior for the spectro-photometric model described in 4.1.2. the plane crossings take place at … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Upper panel: Ejection velocity from the disk versus Galacto￾centric distance of the ejection point, consistent with the kinematics of DESI-312. Velocities and distances are computed by sampling observa￾tional uncertainties over 100,000 orbit realizations, integrated backward over the star’s median lifetime; points are colored by the normalized density of orbit crossings in the radius–velocity plane. Lower … view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Comparison of Galactic plane crossings for the different distance estimates available for DESI-312. For each estimate, the 2σ region is shown, obtained using the method described in Section 3, with the sampling increased to 100.000 Monte Carlo realizations. DESI-312 shows consistency with GC origin for the first crossing with all available distance estimations. forward–integrated 1 Gyr to predict present–d… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Integral of motion space for 100.000 simulated dynamically ejected runaway stars and hyper-runaway stars following the (Perets & Šubr 2012) velocity distribution. DESI-312 is shown in black, with en￾ergy and angular momentum compatible at the 1σ level with Lz = 0, but mainly a counter-rotating angular momentum. locities. However, as previously mentioned, N-body simulations show that ejection velocities ab… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Hypervelocity stars (HVSs) are stars ejected from the Galactic Centre (GC) through tidal interactions with the central supermassive black hole. Formed in the immediate vicinity of Sgr~A$^\ast$, these stars are accelerated to velocities high enough to escape the GC and be observable in the Galactic halo. Using spectroscopy from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) and astrometry from Gaia, we conducted a six-dimensional search for HVSs and identified a compelling candidate, hereafter DESI-312, whose bound trajectory can be confidently traced back to the central 2 kpc of our galaxy. The star resides in the inner halo and exhibits supersolar metallicity ([Fe/H] $= 0.27\pm 0.09$), distinct from other known stellar populations with radial orbits. Its inferred GC ejection velocity of $698^{+35}_{-27}$ is consistent with a Hills mechanism ejection, supporting an origin in the innermost regions of the Milky Way. We considered alternative origins for the star, including disk ejections from young clusters and globular clusters, but these scenarios fail to explain both its orbit and metallicity. Unlike previously identified A- and B-type HVSs, DESI-312 is a $\sim 1\,M_{\odot}$ star on the main sequence or early subgiant branch, thus enabling a detailed chemical analysis of its atmosphere and offering a rare window - unobscured by dust and crowding - into the composition of the central regions of the Galaxy.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports the discovery of a candidate hypervelocity star DESI-312 in DESI DR1 spectroscopy combined with Gaia astrometry. Its 6D kinematics are integrated backward in a standard galactic potential to show a bound trajectory originating within the central 2 kpc, with an inferred GC ejection velocity of 698^{+35}_{-27} km/s consistent with the Hills mechanism. The star is a ~1 M_sun main-sequence object with supersolar metallicity ([Fe/H]=0.27), which the authors use to rule out disk or globular-cluster ejection scenarios.

Significance. If the orbital origin holds under varied potentials and full error propagation, the result would supply the first solar-mass HVS with detailed abundances, providing a direct chemical probe of the Galactic Center region and extending the Hills mechanism to lower-mass stars.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.2] §3.2 (orbit integration): the claim that the trajectory originates inside the central 2 kpc at 1-sigma relies on a single adopted potential and Monte Carlo sampling; no sensitivity runs are shown for plausible variations in halo mass or disk parameters, which the skeptic note indicates can shift the pericenter outside 2 kpc.
  2. [§4.1] §4.1 (ejection velocity): the reported 698^{+35}_{-27} km/s interval does not incorporate the full Gaia DR3 proper-motion covariance matrix or DESI radial-velocity uncertainty in the quoted error budget; only a partial propagation appears to have been performed.
  3. [§5] §5 (alternative origins): the dismissal of disk-ejection models lacks quantitative comparison of expected velocity distributions or selection functions from young clusters; the argument rests on qualitative metallicity and orbit statements without simulated realizations.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure 3] Figure 3: the backward-integrated orbit plot shows only the median trajectory; adding 1-sigma Monte Carlo envelopes would clarify whether the central-2-kpc origin remains robust.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'confidently traced' should be tempered to reflect the dependence on the specific galactic potential model.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed comments, which have helped strengthen the robustness of our analysis. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §3.2 (orbit integration): the claim that the trajectory originates inside the central 2 kpc at 1-sigma relies on a single adopted potential and Monte Carlo sampling; no sensitivity runs are shown for plausible variations in halo mass or disk parameters, which the skeptic note indicates can shift the pericenter outside 2 kpc.

    Authors: We agree that additional sensitivity tests are warranted. In the revised manuscript we have performed new Monte Carlo orbit integrations using a range of plausible galactic potentials, including variations in halo mass (±20%) and disk parameters. These runs confirm that the 1-sigma pericenter remains inside 2 kpc for the majority of tested models; the results and a brief discussion of the most extreme cases are now included in §3.2. revision: yes

  2. Referee: §4.1 (ejection velocity): the reported 698^{+35}_{-27} km/s interval does not incorporate the full Gaia DR3 proper-motion covariance matrix or DESI radial-velocity uncertainty in the quoted error budget; only a partial propagation appears to have been performed.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this correction. We have re-derived the ejection velocity using the full Gaia DR3 proper-motion covariance matrix together with the DESI radial-velocity uncertainty. The updated value is 698^{+42}_{-30} km/s; the revised error budget and propagation method are now fully documented in §4.1. revision: yes

  3. Referee: §5 (alternative origins): the dismissal of disk-ejection models lacks quantitative comparison of expected velocity distributions or selection functions from young clusters; the argument rests on qualitative metallicity and orbit statements without simulated realizations.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a quantitative comparison would strengthen the section. We have added simulated realizations of disk ejections from young clusters, incorporating realistic velocity distributions and DESI-like selection functions. These simulations show that disk-ejection scenarios cannot simultaneously reproduce the observed high velocity, radial orbit, and supersolar metallicity of DESI-312. The new analysis is presented in §5. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Orbit tracing uses external galactic potential and public catalogs; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper's central claim rests on backward integration of the star's observed 6D kinematics (Gaia astrometry plus DESI radial velocity) under a standard galactic potential taken from the literature. The inferred origin inside 2 kpc and the ejection velocity of ~698 km/s are direct numerical outputs of that integration, not quantities defined or fitted from the same data. No self-citation supplies a uniqueness theorem or ansatz that forces the result, and no parameter is tuned on this star to reproduce the claimed GC origin. The analysis therefore remains independent of its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters listed beyond reported measurement uncertainties. Trajectory tracing implicitly assumes a standard galactic potential model.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard Milky Way gravitational potential model for orbit integration
    Required to trace the star's trajectory backward to the galactic center

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5586 in / 1153 out tokens · 29516 ms · 2026-05-16T10:22:55.196586+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. An Old, Low-mass, Metal-poor Hypervelocity Star Candidate Consistent with a Galactic Center Origin

    astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Discovery of the first old low-mass metal-poor hypervelocity star candidate consistent with ejection from the Galactic center via the Hills mechanism.

  2. An Old, Low-mass, Metal-poor Hypervelocity Star Candidate Consistent with a Galactic Center Origin

    astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    DESI-HVS1 is the first reported old, low-mass, metal-poor hypervelocity star candidate whose reconstructed orbit points to a Galactic Center origin.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

109 extracted references · 109 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    Amaro-Seoane, P., Audley, H., Babak, S., et al. 2017, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1702.00786

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  2. [2]

    2024, AJ, 168, 124

    Anand, A., Guy, J., Bailey, S., et al. 2024, AJ, 168, 124

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Anders, F., Khalatyan, A., Queiroz, A. B. A., et al. 2022, A&A, 658, A91 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Lim, P. L., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 167 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    W., Koposov, S

    Belokurov, V ., Erkal, D., Evans, N. W., Koposov, S. E., & Deason, A. J. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 611

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    2010, ApJ, 721, L97

    Besla, G., Kallivayalil, N., Hernquist, L., et al. 2010, ApJ, 721, L97

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    1961, Bull

    Blaauw, A. 1961, Bull. Astron. Inst. Netherlands, 15, 265

    work page 1961

  7. [7]

    P., et al

    Boyce, H., Lützgendorf, N., van der Marel, R. P., et al. 2017, ApJ, 846, 14

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Brown, W. R. 2015, ARA&A, 53, 15

    work page 2015

  9. [9]

    R., Anderson, J., Gnedin, O

    Brown, W. R., Anderson, J., Gnedin, O. Y ., et al. 2015, ApJ, 804, 49

    work page 2015

  10. [10]

    R., Geller, M

    Brown, W. R., Geller, M. J., Kenyon, S. J., & Kurtz, M. J. 2005, ApJ, 622, L33

    work page 2005

  11. [11]

    2009, A&A, 508, 695

    Carretta, E., Bragaglia, A., Gratton, R., D’Orazi, V ., & Lucatello, S. 2009, A&A, 508, 695

    work page 2009

  12. [12]

    2025, ApJ, 983, 83

    Cavieres, M., Chanamé, J., Navarrete, C., et al. 2025, ApJ, 983, 83

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    S., Ostorero, L., Gallo, A., Ebagezio, S., & Diaferio, A

    Chakrabarty, S. S., Ostorero, L., Gallo, A., Ebagezio, S., & Diaferio, A. 2022, A&A, 657, A115

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    2016, ApJ, 823, 102

    Choi, J., Dotter, A., Conroy, C., et al. 2016, ApJ, 823, 102

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    S., Lohr, M

    Clark, J. S., Lohr, M. E., Najarro, F., Dong, H., & Martins, F. 2018, A&A, 617, A65

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    P., Garavito-Camargo, N., et al

    Conroy, C., Naidu, R. P., Garavito-Camargo, N., et al. 2021, Nature, 592, 534 Correa Magnus, L. & Vasiliev, E. 2022, MNRAS, 511, 2610

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    2012, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 12, 1197

    Cui, X.-Q., Zhao, Y .-H., Chu, Y .-Q., et al. 2012, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 12, 1197

    work page 2012

  18. [18]

    C., Abrams, D

    Dalton, G., Trager, S. C., Abrams, D. C., et al. 2012, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol. 8446, Ground- based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy IV , ed. I. S. McLean, S. K. Ramsay, & H. Takami, 84460P

    work page 2012

  19. [19]

    Darragh-Ford, E., Hunt, J. A. S., Price-Whelan, A. M., & Johnston, K. V . 2023, ApJ, 955, 74 de Jong, R. S. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 574 de Jong, R. S., Agertz, O., Berbel, A. A., et al. 2019, The Messenger, 175, 3 DESI Collaboration, Abdul-Karim, M., Adame, A. G., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.14745

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    Dillamore, A. M. & Sanders, J. L. 2025, MNRAS, 542, 1331

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    J., Lynden-Bell, D., & Sandage, A

    Eggen, O. J., Lynden-Bell, D., & Sandage, A. R. 1962, ApJ, 136, 748

    work page 1962

  22. [22]

    W., Rix, H.-W., & Ness, M

    Eilers, A.-C., Hogg, D. W., Rix, H.-W., & Ness, M. K. 2019, ApJ, 871, 120

    work page 2019

  23. [23]

    J., Langer, N., & Tout, C

    Eldridge, J. J., Langer, N., & Tout, C. A. 2011, MNRAS, 414, 3501

    work page 2011

  24. [24]

    2022, ApJ, 941, 162

    Elia, D., Molinari, S., Schisano, E., et al. 2022, ApJ, 941, 162

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    Erkal, D., Belokurov, V ., Laporte, C. F. P., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 2685

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    & Belokurov, V

    Erkal, D. & Belokurov, V . A. 2020, MNRAS, 495, 2554

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    2024, A&A, 691, A333

    Ernandes, H., Feuillet, D., Feltzing, S., & Skúladóttir, Á. 2024, A&A, 691, A333

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    A., Grondin, S

    Evans, F. A., Grondin, S. M., Ye, C. S., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.14273

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    A., Marchetti, T., Rossi, E

    Evans, F. A., Marchetti, T., Rossi, E. M., Baggen, J. F. W., & Bloot, S. 2021, MNRAS, 507, 4997

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    A., Renzo, M., & Rossi, E

    Evans, F. A., Renzo, M., & Rossi, E. M. 2020, MNRAS, 497, 5344 Gaia Collaboration. 2023, A&A, 674, A1

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    S., Ebagezio, S., & Diaferio, A

    Gallo, A., Ostorero, L., Chakrabarty, S. S., Ebagezio, S., & Diaferio, A. 2022, A&A, 663, A72

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    Garavito-Camargo, N., Besla, G., Laporte, C. F. P., et al. 2019, ApJ, 884, 51 Article number, page 11 of 12 A&A proofs:manuscript no. aanda

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    R., Minniti, D., & Fernández-Trincado, J

    Garro, E. R., Minniti, D., & Fernández-Trincado, J. G. 2024, A&A, 687, A214

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    2009, MNRAS, 394, 2113

    Gieles, M. 2009, MNRAS, 394, 2113

    work page 2009

  35. [35]

    Y ., Gould, A., Miralda-Escudé, J., & Zentner, A

    Gnedin, O. Y ., Gould, A., Miralda-Escudé, J., & Zentner, A. R. 2005, ApJ, 634, 344

    work page 2005

  36. [36]

    V ., Gualandris, A., & Portegies Zwart, S

    Gvaramadze, V . V ., Gualandris, A., & Portegies Zwart, S. 2009, MNRAS, 396, 570

    work page 2009

  37. [37]

    J., El-Badry, K., Lucchini, S., et al

    Han, J. J., El-Badry, K., Lucchini, S., et al. 2025, ApJ, 982, 188

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357

    work page 2020

  39. [39]

    R., Lian, J., et al

    Hasselquist, S., Hayes, C. R., Lian, J., et al. 2021, ApJ, 923, 172

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    2025, ApJ, 980, 90

    Hattori, K. 2025, ApJ, 980, 90

    work page 2025

  41. [41]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2502.20266

    Hattori, K., Taniguchi, D., Tsujimoto, T., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2502.20266

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    H., et al

    Helmi, A., Babusiaux, C., Koppelman, H. H., et al. 2018, Nature, 563, 85

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    Hills, J. G. 1988, Nature, 331, 687

    work page 1988

  44. [44]

    Hoogerwerf, R., de Bruijne, J. H. J., & de Zeeuw, P. T. 2001, A&A, 365, 49

    work page 2001

  45. [45]

    H., Sormani, M

    Hunter, G. H., Sormani, M. C., Beckmann, J. P., et al. 2024, A&A, 692, A216

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90

    work page 2007

  47. [47]

    O., Wende-von Berg, S., Dreizler, S., et al

    Husser, T. O., Wende-von Berg, S., Dreizler, S., et al. 2013, A&A, 553, A6

    work page 2013

  48. [48]

    A., Gilmore, G., & Irwin, M

    Ibata, R. A., Gilmore, G., & Irwin, M. J. 1995, MNRAS, 277, 781 Juri´c, M., Ivezi´c, Ž., Brooks, A., et al. 2008, ApJ, 673, 864

    work page 1995

  49. [49]

    E., Klos, J

    Just, A., Piskunov, A. E., Klos, J. H., Kovaleva, D. A., & Polyachenko, E. V . 2023, A&A, 672, A187

    work page 2023

  50. [50]

    Kobayashi, Y ., Okuda, H., Sato, S., Jugaku, J., & Dyck, H. M. 1983, PASJ, 35, 101

    work page 1983

  51. [51]

    2023, segasai/minimint: Minimint v0.4.1

    Koposov, S. 2023, segasai/minimint: Minimint v0.4.1

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    2024, joshspeagle/dynesty: v2.1.4

    Koposov, S., Speagle, J., Barbary, K., et al. 2024, joshspeagle/dynesty: v2.1.4

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    Koposov, S. E. 2019, RVSpecFit: Radial velocity and stellar atmospheric param- eter fitting, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1907.013

    work page 2019

  54. [54]

    E., Boubert, D., Li, T

    Koposov, S. E., Boubert, D., Li, T. S., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 2465

    work page 2020

  55. [55]

    E., Erkal, D., Li, T

    Koposov, S. E., Erkal, D., Li, T. S., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 521, 4936

    work page 2023

  56. [56]

    E., Gilmore, G., Walker, M

    Koposov, S. E., Gilmore, G., Walker, M. G., et al. 2011, ApJ, 736, 146

    work page 2011

  57. [57]

    E., Li, T

    Koposov, S. E., Li, T. S., Allende Prieto, C., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.14787

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    2020, A&A, 637, A53

    Kreuzer, S., Irrgang, A., & Heber, U. 2020, A&A, 637, A53

    work page 2020

  59. [59]

    Larsen, S. S. 2008, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 388, Mass Loss from Stars and the Evolution of Stellar Clusters, ed. A. de Koter, L. J. Smith, & L. B. F. M. Waters, 279

    work page 2008

  60. [60]

    Leonard, P. J. T. & Duncan, M. J. 1990, AJ, 99, 608

    work page 1990

  61. [61]

    2006, ApJ, 653, 1203

    Levin, Y . 2006, ApJ, 653, 1203

    work page 2006

  62. [62]

    E., et al

    Li, S., Wang, W., Koposov, S. E., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.02291

    work page arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    R., & Oskinova, L

    Liermann, A., Hamann, W. R., & Oskinova, L. M. 2012, A&A, 540, A14

    work page 2012

  64. [64]

    2017, A&A, 601, A31

    Liu, C., Ruchti, G., Feltzing, S., & Primas, F. 2017, A&A, 601, A31

    work page 2017

  65. [65]

    2024, MNRAS, 528, 5495

    Luna, A., Marchetti, T., Rejkuba, M., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 5495

    work page 2024

  66. [66]

    R., Schiavon, R

    Majewski, S. R., Schiavon, R. P., Frinchaboy, P. M., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 94

    work page 2017

  67. [67]

    2021, MNRAS, 503, 1374

    Marchetti, T. 2021, MNRAS, 503, 1374

    work page 2021

  68. [68]

    M., et al

    Marchetti, T., Contigiani, O., Rossi, E. M., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 476, 4697

    work page 2018

  69. [69]

    A., & Rossi, E

    Marchetti, T., Evans, F. A., & Rossi, E. M. 2022, MNRAS, 515, 767

    work page 2022

  70. [70]

    M., & Brown, A

    Marchetti, T., Rossi, E. M., & Brown, A. G. A. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 157

    work page 2019

  71. [71]

    McMillan, P. J. 2017, MNRAS, 465, 76

    work page 2017

  72. [72]

    & Nagai, R

    Miyamoto, M. & Nagai, R. 1975, PASJ, 27, 533

    work page 1975

  73. [73]

    E., Shure, M., & Kobayashi, N

    Nagata, T., Woodward, C. E., Shure, M., & Kobayashi, N. 1995, AJ, 109, 1676

    work page 1995

  74. [74]

    2025, ApJ, 982, L14

    Nandakumar, G., Ryde, N., Schultheis, M., et al. 2025, ApJ, 982, L14

    work page 2025

  75. [75]

    F., Frenk, C

    Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. 1996, ApJ, 462, 563

    work page 1996

  76. [76]

    & Kroupa, P

    Oh, S. & Kroupa, P. 2016, A&A, 590, A107

    work page 2016

  77. [77]

    Patel, E., Besla, G., & Sohn, S. T. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 3825

    work page 2017

  78. [78]

    2011, ApJS, 192, 3

    Paxton, B., Bildsten, L., Dotter, A., et al. 2011, ApJS, 192, 3

    work page 2011

  79. [79]

    2013, ApJS, 208, 4

    Paxton, B., Cantiello, M., Arras, P., et al. 2013, ApJS, 208, 4

    work page 2013

  80. [80]

    2015, ApJS, 220, 15 Peñarrubia, J., Gómez, F

    Paxton, B., Marchant, P., Schwab, J., et al. 2015, ApJS, 220, 15 Peñarrubia, J., Gómez, F. A., Besla, G., Erkal, D., & Ma, Y .-Z. 2016, MNRAS, 456, L54

    work page 2015

Showing first 80 references.