pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.00443 · v2 · pith:KOT6CL3Anew · submitted 2026-01-31 · 💻 cs.SD · cs.MM· eess.AS

RVCBench: Benchmarking the Robustness of Voice Cloning Across Modern Audio Generation Models

classification 💻 cs.SD cs.MMeess.AS
keywords robustnessrvcbenchaudiocloningvoicegenerationdatasetlong-form
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Modern voice cloning, also known as zero-shot text-to-speech (TTS), can synthesize speech that closely matches a target speaker from only seconds of reference audio, enabling applications such as personalized speech interfaces and dubbing. In practice, these systems often face noisy reference audio, imperfect text prompts, multilingual and long-form generation, post-processing, and adversarial perturbations, all of which can weaken robustness. Despite rapid progress in codec-token language models and diffusion-based TTS, robustness under realistic deployment shifts remains underexplored. This paper introduces RVCBench, a comprehensive dataset and benchmark for evaluating robustness in voice cloning. RVCBench provides task-aligned tests covering controlled text-audio pairing, multilingual and long-form scenarios, expressive prompts, post-processing conditions, and passive or proactive audio perturbations. Across 18 robustness evaluations, 225 speakers, and 14,370 utterances, RVCBench supports unified evaluation of input sensitivity, generation stability, output resilience, perturbation robustness, speaker similarity, and deepfake detectability. We evaluate 18 representative open-source voice cloning models and reveal systematic vulnerabilities in content consistency, speaker similarity, long-form stability, post-processing resilience, adversarial robustness, and detector-facing separability. We release the code and dataset to support reproducible evaluation and future research on robust voice cloning, speech synthesis, and audio generation. Code: https://github.com/Nanboy-Ronan/RVCBench. Dataset: https://huggingface.co/datasets/Nanboy/RVCBench.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.