arxiv: 2602.01249 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-01 · 📡 eess.SP · eess.AS

Recognition: no theorem link

Generative AI in Signal Processing Education: An Audio Foundation Model Based Approach

Muhammad Salman Khan , Ahmad Ullah , Siddique Latif , Junaid Qadir

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 08:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP eess.AS

keywords audio foundation modelsgenerative AIsignal processing educationSPEduAFMspeech enhancementsource separationeducational technology

0 comments

The pith

Audio Foundation Models can transform signal processing education by integrating core tasks like enhancement and separation into interactive learning via the conceptual SPEduAFM.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that Audio Foundation Models offer a way to merge traditional signal processing principles with generative AI capabilities for educational use. It introduces SPEduAFM as a tailored conceptual model that supports applications including speech enhancement, denoising, source separation, feature extraction, automatic classification, and real-time analysis. A sympathetic reader would care because this integration could convert abstract concepts into practical, engaging experiences such as automated lecture transcription and inclusive tools. The work also examines challenges like ethics and explainability through dynamic auditory interactions to foster authentic learning.

Core claim

The paper claims that SPEduAFM, a conceptual Audio Foundation Model tailored for signal processing education, bridges traditional SP principles with GenAI-driven innovations. Through an envisioned case study, it shows how AFMs enable automated lecture transcription, interactive demonstrations, and inclusive learning tools, turning abstract concepts into engaging practical experiences while addressing ethics, explainability, and customization via real-time auditory interactions.

What carries the argument

SPEduAFM, the conceptual Audio Foundation Model for signal processing education, which integrates core applications such as enhancement, denoising, source separation, and real-time analysis to support learning activities.

If this is right

Automated lecture transcription becomes available for signal processing courses to improve accessibility.
Interactive demonstrations allow real-time exploration of audio enhancement and analysis tasks.
Inclusive learning tools support diverse learners through adaptive auditory interactions.
Dynamic real-time features help address explainability and ethical concerns in educational GenAI use.
Broader adoption of generative AI tools is encouraged across engineering education.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Adoption of such models would likely require new training for instructors on integrating AI outputs into existing curricula.
The approach could connect to similar foundation models in related fields like image or video processing education.
Pilot deployments in university courses could reveal practical customization needs not addressed in the conceptual vision.

Load-bearing premise

That a conceptual model like SPEduAFM can be practically tailored, deployed, and integrated into real educational settings while overcoming ethics, explainability, and customization barriers.

What would settle it

Empirical classroom trials measuring whether students using SPEduAFM-based tools show measurable gains in understanding signal processing concepts like source separation compared to traditional lecture methods alone.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.01249 by Ahmad Ullah, Junaid Qadir, Muhammad Salman Khan, Siddique Latif.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Taxonomy of Signal Processing Techniques for Audio Foundation Models (AFMs). across key educational domains, illustrating how AFMs and signal processing techniques synergistically support more effective and engaging learning experiences. The following sections examine key applications and discuss how AFMs address diverse pedagogical challenges to support more effective and engaging learning experiences. … view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Taxonomy of AFM Applications in Education TABLE I: Applications of AFMs in Education Functionality Educational Use Cases (Summary) AFM Examples Speech-to-Text & Summarization Lecture transcription; summarization; note-taking. Whisper; AudioLM Multilingual Speech Processing Real-time translation; multilingual TTS; support for non-native speakers. AudioPaLM; Voicebox Interactive Feedback & Assessment Pro… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Audio Foundation Models (AFMs), a specialized category of Generative AI (GenAI), have the potential to transform signal processing (SP) education by integrating core applications such as speech and audio enhancement, denoising, source separation, feature extraction, automatic classification, and real-time signal analysis into learning and research. This paper introduces SPEduAFM, a conceptual AFM tailored for SP education, bridging traditional SP principles with GenAI-driven innovations. Through an envisioned case study, we outline how AFMs can enable a range of applications, including automated lecture transcription, interactive demonstrations, and inclusive learning tools, showcasing their potential to transform abstract concepts into engaging, practical experiences. This paper also addresses challenges such as ethics, explainability, and customization by highlighting dynamic, real-time auditory interactions that foster experiential and authentic learning. By presenting SPEduAFM as a forward-looking vision, we aim to inspire broader adoption of GenAI in engineering education, enhancing accessibility, engagement, and innovation in the classroom and beyond.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This is a high-level vision paper proposing SPEduAFM for signal processing education, but it offers no architecture, adaptation details, or evidence to support the claims.

read the letter

This paper is a forward-looking proposal that applies existing ideas about audio foundation models to signal processing teaching. It introduces SPEduAFM as a conceptual tool meant to handle tasks like denoising, source separation, and real-time analysis inside educational settings, with an eye toward making abstract material more interactive through transcription and demonstrations. The authors flag practical issues such as ethics and explainability, which shows some awareness of real deployment hurdles. That part is clear enough and could prompt discussion among people already working on AI in engineering classrooms. The main weakness is that everything stays at the level of an envisioned case study. No architecture diagram, fine-tuning approach, loss function, or even pseudocode appears to show how core signal processing operations would be preserved or enhanced inside the model. Without those pieces, the feasibility of tailoring a foundation model while keeping explainability and customization manageable remains an untested assertion. The paper does not reduce to any self-referential math or fitted parameters, but it also supplies no new derivations or reproducible elements that a reader could check. For someone focused on signal processing methods, this adds little that changes day-to-day work or teaching practice. It might suit readers interested in broad GenAI trends in education, but it does not contain enough substance for a methods-focused reading group. I would not cite it in my own work. A serious editor should desk reject rather than send it to peer review in its current form; the authors would need to add concrete implementation steps or small-scale tests before it merits referee time.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that Audio Foundation Models (AFMs) have the potential to transform signal processing education by integrating core applications such as speech and audio enhancement, denoising, source separation, feature extraction, automatic classification, and real-time signal analysis. It introduces SPEduAFM as a conceptual AFM tailored for SP education that bridges traditional principles with GenAI innovations, outlines an envisioned case study for applications including automated lecture transcription and interactive demonstrations, and discusses challenges such as ethics, explainability, and customization.

Significance. If the conceptual proposal holds, the work could help inspire broader adoption of generative AI tools in engineering education, potentially improving accessibility, engagement, and the translation of abstract SP concepts into practical experiences. As a forward-looking vision paper without empirical results, its significance lies in framing future research directions rather than delivering validated methods or data.

major comments (2)

[SPEduAFM introduction and envisioned case study] The introduction and description of SPEduAFM provide no architecture diagram, adaptation method (such as fine-tuning strategy on continuous audio versus tokenized inputs), loss formulation, or pseudocode showing how core SP operations like denoising and source separation are preserved or enhanced; this leaves the central feasibility claim unsupported.
[Envisioned case study and challenges section] The envisioned case study asserts that AFMs can overcome customization and explainability barriers through dynamic real-time auditory interactions, yet supplies no concrete implementation details, example workflows, or discussion of how traditional SP principles are explicitly bridged, rendering the claims about practical integration into educational settings untestable within the manuscript.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract and introduction] The abstract and introduction repeat the list of SP applications (enhancement, denoising, source separation, etc.) without clarifying which are newly enabled by AFMs versus already addressed by existing tools.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our vision paper. We clarify below that SPEduAFM is presented as a high-level conceptual framework rather than an implemented system, which informs our responses to the technical-detail concerns.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [SPEduAFM introduction and envisioned case study] The introduction and description of SPEduAFM provide no architecture diagram, adaptation method (such as fine-tuning strategy on continuous audio versus tokenized inputs), loss formulation, or pseudocode showing how core SP operations like denoising and source separation are preserved or enhanced; this leaves the central feasibility claim unsupported.

Authors: As explicitly stated in the abstract and introduction, this is a forward-looking vision paper without empirical results or implementation. Detailed elements such as architecture diagrams, fine-tuning strategies, loss formulations, or pseudocode are outside the intended scope and would belong to a subsequent technical development paper. The feasibility claim is framed as potential transformation based on the documented capabilities of existing audio foundation models in tasks like denoising and source separation, cross-referenced to the broader GenAI literature. We therefore see no need to add these specifics to support the paper's stated goals. revision: no
Referee: [Envisioned case study and challenges section] The envisioned case study asserts that AFMs can overcome customization and explainability barriers through dynamic real-time auditory interactions, yet supplies no concrete implementation details, example workflows, or discussion of how traditional SP principles are explicitly bridged, rendering the claims about practical integration into educational settings untestable within the manuscript.

Authors: The case study is deliberately high-level to outline educational opportunities and how real-time auditory interactions could address challenges such as customization and explainability while building on core SP concepts (e.g., spectral analysis in denoising). No concrete workflows or implementation details are provided because the manuscript does not claim to deliver a testable prototype; it aims to inspire future work. Traditional SP principles are bridged at the conceptual level through the described applications, consistent with the scope of other vision papers in engineering education. We maintain this approach is appropriate and do not view the claims as requiring immediate testability. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: conceptual vision paper with no derivations or self-referential reductions

full rationale

The manuscript is a forward-looking conceptual proposal introducing SPEduAFM as a high-level vision for applying Audio Foundation Models to signal processing education. It contains no equations, parameter fittings, derivations, or mathematical claims that could reduce to their own inputs. The central assertions rest on an 'envisioned case study' and discussion of challenges (ethics, explainability, customization) without any load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes imported from prior author work. All steps are descriptive and aspirational rather than deductive, so no circularity patterns apply.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on domain assumptions about the adaptability of audio foundation models to education and the feasibility of real-time interactive tools without demonstrated evidence.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Generative AI models can be effectively tailored and customized for signal processing education applications
Invoked throughout the proposal of SPEduAFM and the case study applications

invented entities (1)

SPEduAFM no independent evidence
purpose: Conceptual audio foundation model tailored for signal processing education
Introduced as a forward-looking vision without implementation or independent evidence

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5481 in / 1226 out tokens · 35684 ms · 2026-05-16T08:41:27.342188+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

23 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

J. H. McClellan, R. Schafer, and M. Yoder,DSP First, 2nd ed. Pearson, August 2015

work page 2015
[2]

M. J. Guzdial and B. Ericson,Introduction to Computing and Program- ming in Python, Global Edition, 4th ed. Pearson, 2020

work page 2020
[3]

Engineering education in the era of ChatGPT: Promise and pitfalls of generative AI for education,

J. Qadir, “Engineering education in the era of ChatGPT: Promise and pitfalls of generative AI for education,” in2023 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–9

work page 2023
[4]

Generative artificial intel- ligence and engineering education,

A. Johri, A. S. Katz, J. Qadir, and A. Hingle, “Generative artificial intel- ligence and engineering education,”Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 112, pp. 572–577, 2023

work page 2023
[5]

AudioLM: A language modeling approach to audio generation,

Z. Borsos, R. Marinier, D. Vincent, E. Kharitonov, O. Pietquin, M. Shar- ifi, D. Roblek, O. Teboul, D. Grangier, M. Tagliasacchi, and N. Zeghi- dour, “AudioLM: A language modeling approach to audio generation,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, vol. 31, pp. 2523–2533, 2023

work page 2023
[6]

SpeechGPT: Empowering large language models with intrinsic cross- modal conversational abilities,

D. Zhang, S. Li, X. Zhang, J. Zhan, P. Wang, Y . Zhou, and X. Qiu, “SpeechGPT: Empowering large language models with intrinsic cross- modal conversational abilities,” inFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023. Singapore: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2023, pp. 15 757–15 773

work page 2023
[7]

Attention is all you need,

A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, Ł. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, “Attention is all you need,”Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 30, 2017

work page 2017
[8]

Sparks of large audio models: A survey and outlook,

S. Latif, M. Shoukat, F. Shamshad, M. Usama, Y . Ren, H. Cuay ´ahuitl, W. Wang, X. Zhang, R. Togneri, E. Cambriaet al., “Sparks of large audio models: A survey and outlook,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.12792, 2023

work page arXiv 2023
[9]

AudioPaLM: A Large Language Model That Can Speak and Listen

P. K. Rubenstein, C. Asawaroengchai, D. D. Nguyen, A. Bapna, Z. Bor- sos, F. d. C. Quitry, P. Chen, D. E. Badawy, W. Han, E. Kharitonovet al., “AudioPaLM: A large language model that can speak and listen,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.12925, 2023

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[10]

Wavjourney: Compositional audio creation with large language models,

X. Liu, Z. Zhu, H. Liu, Y . Yuan, Q. Huang, M. Cui, J. Liang, Y . Cao, Q. Kong, M. D. Plumbley, and W. Wang, “Wavjourney: Compositional audio creation with large language models,”IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing, vol. 33, pp. 2830–2844, 2025

work page 2025
[11]

Multimodal foundation models: From specialists to general-purpose assistants,

C. Li, Z. Gan, Z. Yang, J. Yang, L. Li, L. Wang, and J. Gao, “Multimodal foundation models: From specialists to general-purpose assistants,”Foundations and Trends® in Computer Graphics and Vision, vol. 16, no. 1-2, pp. 1–214, 2024. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/0600000110

work page doi:10.1561/0600000110 2024
[12]

Breaking barriers: Can multilingual foundation models bridge the gap in cross-language speech emotion recognition?

M. Shoukat, M. Usama, H. S. Ali, and S. Latif, “Breaking barriers: Can multilingual foundation models bridge the gap in cross-language speech emotion recognition?” in2023 Tenth International Conference on Social Networks Analysis, Management and Security (SNAMS). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–9

work page 2023
[13]

Education 5.0: Requirements, enabling technologies, and future direc- tions,

S. Ahmad, S. Umirzakova, G. Mujtaba, M. S. Amin, and T. Whangbo, “Education 5.0: Requirements, enabling technologies, and future direc- tions,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.15846, 2023

work page arXiv 2023
[14]

Downey,Think DSP: digital signal processing in Python

A. Downey,Think DSP: digital signal processing in Python. O’Reilly Media, Inc., 2016

work page 2016
[15]

Flipping signal-processing instruction [SP education],

B. Van Veen, “Flipping signal-processing instruction [SP education],” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 145–150, 2013

work page 2013
[16]

On “flipping

W. U. Bajwa, “On “flipping” a large signal processing class [SP education],”IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 158– 170, 2017

work page 2017
[17]

The signals and systems concept inventory,

K. E. Wage, J. R. Buck, C. H. Wright, and T. B. Welch, “The signals and systems concept inventory,”IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 448–461, 2005

work page 2005
[18]

Cukurova, F

M. Cukurova, F. Miaoet al.,AI competency framework for teachers. UNESCO Publishing, 2024, retrieved from https://www.unesco.org/en/ articles/ai-competency-framework-teachers

work page 2024
[19]

AI Competency Framework for Students,

F. Miao and K. Shiohira, “AI Competency Framework for Students,” UNESCO: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organ- isation, France, 2024, retrieved from https://coilink.org/20.500.12592/ 1a8nwhl on 13 Jan 2025. COI: 20.500.12592/1a8nwhl

work page 2024
[20]

The GUIDES framework: Enhancing engineering education with generative AI,

J. Qadir, “The GUIDES framework: Enhancing engineering education with generative AI,” inEDULEARN24 Proceedings, ser. 16th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies. IATED, 1-3 July 2024, pp. 8418–8428. [Online]. Available: https: //doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2024.2006

work page doi:10.21125/edulearn.2024.2006 2024
[21]

A student primer on how to thrive in engineering education during and beyond covid-19,

J. Qadir and A. Al-Fuqaha, “A student primer on how to thrive in engineering education during and beyond covid-19,”Education Sciences, vol. 10, no. 9, p. 236, 2020

work page 2020
[22]

Understanding by design,

G. Wiggins, “Understanding by design,”Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 2005

work page 2005
[23]

Generative AI in education: Op- portunities, challenges, and ethical guidelines,

UNESCO, “Generative AI in education: Op- portunities, challenges, and ethical guidelines,” https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000385435, 2023, accessed: 2024-10-17

work page 2023