pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.09981 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-10 · ⚛️ physics.app-ph

Thin-Film-Engineered Self-Assembly of 3D Coaxial Microfluidics with a Tunable Polyimide Membrane for Bioelectronic Power

Aleksandr I. Egunov , Hongmei Tang , Pablo E. Saenz , Dmitriy D. Karnaushenko , Yumin Luo , Chao Zhong , Xinyu Wang , Yang Huang
show 6 more authors
Pavel Fedorov Leandro Merces Minshen Zhu Daniil Karnaushenko Oliver G. Schmidt
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 02:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.app-ph
keywords self-assembly3D coaxial microfluidicspolyimide membranebioelectronic powerSwiss-roll microtubesproton-exchange membranevolumetric power densitybiofouling
0
0 comments X

The pith

Self-assembly rolls thin films into 3D coaxial microtubes with tunable polyimide membranes that deliver 3.1 mW cm-3 volumetric power in a 4.16 mm2 footprint.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows how lithographically patterned multilayer films can roll themselves into tiny 3D coaxial tubes that contain a proton-conducting polyimide layer as part of the structure. After rolling, the membrane can be chemically adjusted to let protons pass while limiting other molecules, and the design keeps microbial cells physically apart from the electrodes. This separation identifies biofouling as the main cause of failure in earlier versions and allows the treated membranes to recover performance after contamination. The resulting device reaches a power output of about 3.1 milliwatts per cubic centimeter inside a volume smaller than one microliter. Such compact generators could supply energy to autonomous microsystems that need to operate without external wiring or large batteries.

Core claim

Strain-induced self-assembly converts patterned multilayer thin films into functional 3D coaxial Swiss-roll microtubes with total active volumes below 1 microliter, incorporating a monolithic chemically tunable polyimide proton-exchange membrane that permits post-fabrication optimization of ionic transport to balance proton conduction against mediator blocking, while a dual-mode scheme physically excludes microorganisms to reveal biofouling as the dominant failure mechanism and to maintain stable operation with excellent membrane recoverability after fouling.

What carries the argument

Strain-induced self-assembly platform that forms 3D coaxial Swiss-roll microtubes with monolithic integration of a chemically tunable polyimide proton-exchange membrane for post-assembly ionic transport optimization.

If this is right

  • Biofouling is established as the primary failure mode in conventional designs rather than chemical fouling or membrane breakdown.
  • Optimally treated polyimide membranes demonstrate strong recoverability after fouling events.
  • Cell-free dual-mode operation maintains consistent performance by physically excluding microorganisms from the microelectronic environment.
  • The thin-film approach provides a scalable route to tunable 3D bioelectronic power sources for compact autonomous microsystems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The self-assembly process could be extended to incorporate additional functional layers for integrated sensing or actuation within the same small volume.
  • Recovery capability of the membrane suggests potential for repeated use or longer-term operation in environments where periodic cleaning is possible.
  • Arrays of these microtubes might be assembled to increase total power while retaining the ultra-compact overall footprint for distributed microscale applications.
  • The physical exclusion principle could be tested in flowing biological fluids to determine if it prevents new contamination modes not seen in static tests.

Load-bearing premise

Post-fabrication chemical treatment of the polyimide membrane can reliably achieve balanced proton transport and mediator blocking while preserving mechanical integrity through the rolling process and operation.

What would settle it

Measure whether power output remains near 3.1 mW cm-3 and stability holds when live microorganisms are introduced into the same fluid compartment as the electrodes without the physical separation barrier.

read the original abstract

Thin-film self-assembly of three-dimensional (3D) microsystems presents a compelling route to integrate complex functionalities into ultra-compact volumes, yet strategies for incorporating tunable ion-conducting elements remain limited. Here, we introduce a strain-induced self assembly platform that transforms lithographically patterned multilayer thin films into functional 3D coaxial Swiss-roll microtubes with total active volumes below 1 uL. A key innovation is the monolithic integration of a chemically tunable polyimide proton-exchange membrane, enabling post-fabrication optimization of ionic transport that balances proton transport with mediator blocking. We further implement a dual-mode operational scheme that decouples microbial metabolism from electrochemical power generation, revealing biofouling, not chemical fouling or membrane degradation, as the dominant failure mechanism in conventional architectures. Critically, optimally treated polyimide membranes exhibit excellent recoverability after fouling, while cell-free mode operation maintains stable performance by physically excluding microorganisms from the microelectronic environment. This integrated bio-electronic microsystem achieves a volumetric power density of ~3.1 mW cm-3 within an ultra-compact footprint of 4.16 mm2. Our work establishes a scalable thin-film engineering approach to create tunable, 3D bioelectronic power sources for autonomous microsystems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a strain-induced self-assembly platform that transforms lithographically patterned multilayer thin films into 3D coaxial Swiss-roll microtubes with integrated chemically tunable polyimide proton-exchange membranes. It reports a volumetric power density of ~3.1 mW cm^{-3} in a 4.16 mm^{2} footprint, implements a dual-mode operational scheme that decouples microbial metabolism from electrochemical generation, identifies biofouling as the dominant failure mode, and claims excellent recoverability plus physical microbial exclusion in cell-free mode.

Significance. If substantiated, the work would provide a scalable thin-film route to compact bioelectronic power sources with tunable ionic transport, addressing integration challenges for autonomous microsystems and offering a potential alternative to conventional microbial fuel cell architectures limited by fouling.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the reported volumetric power density of ~3.1 mW cm^{-3} is stated without error bars, replicate counts, baseline comparisons to untuned or non-coaxial controls, or quantitative membrane conductivity data, preventing verification that the value arises from the claimed membrane tuning rather than unaccounted experimental variables.
  2. [Results] Results section (membrane characterization): the claim that post-fabrication chemical treatment balances proton transport against mediator blocking after rolling requires before/after impedance spectra or conductivity retention metrics; without these, the attribution of stable performance to the polyimide integration cannot be assessed.
  3. [Discussion] Discussion (dual-mode operation): the assertion that the scheme physically excludes microorganisms lacks direct supporting evidence such as SEM, fluorescence leakage assays, or microbial ingress tests post-rolling; the reported stability could instead reflect reduced rather than excluded fouling, weakening the central architectural advantage.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the active volume is given as below 1 µL while the footprint is 4.16 mm^{2}; add a brief clarification of how the rolled coaxial geometry converts the planar footprint into the stated volumetric density for reader consistency.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed review of our manuscript. We have prepared point-by-point responses to each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to improve clarity and address the concerns where possible.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the reported volumetric power density of ~3.1 mW cm^{-3} is stated without error bars, replicate counts, baseline comparisons to untuned or non-coaxial controls, or quantitative membrane conductivity data, preventing verification that the value arises from the claimed membrane tuning rather than unaccounted experimental variables.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from additional statistical and comparative details to facilitate verification. The reported power density is based on experimental measurements detailed in the Results section, with baseline comparisons to untuned membranes and non-coaxial controls provided in the main text and supplementary materials. Quantitative membrane conductivity data from impedance measurements is also included in the Results. In the revised manuscript, we will update the abstract to incorporate error bars, replicate counts, and explicit references to these supporting data and comparisons. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results section (membrane characterization): the claim that post-fabrication chemical treatment balances proton transport against mediator blocking after rolling requires before/after impedance spectra or conductivity retention metrics; without these, the attribution of stable performance to the polyimide integration cannot be assessed.

    Authors: The Results section discusses the impact of the post-fabrication chemical treatment on ionic transport properties. To strengthen this attribution, we will add before-and-after impedance spectra and associated conductivity retention metrics in the revised version. These additions will directly demonstrate the balance between proton transport and mediator blocking achieved through the polyimide integration. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Discussion] Discussion (dual-mode operation): the assertion that the scheme physically excludes microorganisms lacks direct supporting evidence such as SEM, fluorescence leakage assays, or microbial ingress tests post-rolling; the reported stability could instead reflect reduced rather than excluded fouling, weakening the central architectural advantage.

    Authors: The dual-mode operational scheme is enabled by the coaxial rolled architecture, which is designed to physically decouple the microbial compartment from the electrode environment. The extended stability observed in cell-free mode, in contrast to rapid performance decay due to biofouling in conventional operation, provides supporting evidence for this mechanism. We will revise the Discussion to more explicitly describe the architectural basis for exclusion and include additional time-dependent performance metrics. We acknowledge that direct post-rolling imaging or ingress assays were not conducted. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Direct SEM, fluorescence leakage assays, or microbial ingress tests post-rolling to demonstrate physical exclusion of microorganisms.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental power-density claim is a direct measurement, not a derived prediction

full rationale

The manuscript describes a fabrication process (strain-induced rolling of lithographically patterned thin films) followed by post-fabrication chemical treatment of the polyimide membrane and direct experimental measurement of volumetric power density (~3.1 mW cm^{-3}). No equations, fitted parameters, or derivation chain appear in the provided text that would reduce the reported performance metric to its own inputs by construction. The central result is presented as an empirical outcome benchmarked against external units (mW cm^{-3}, mm^{2} footprint), not as a prediction obtained from a model whose parameters were tuned on the same data. Self-citations to prior thin-film self-assembly work exist but are not load-bearing for the power-density claim, which rests on physical measurements (impedance, current-voltage curves, fouling recovery) that remain independently falsifiable. Therefore the paper is self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default non-circularity score.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is experimental and reports device performance; the central claim rests on the assumption that the polyimide membrane treatment achieves the stated transport selectivity and that biofouling dominates over other degradation paths, neither of which is supported by independent evidence in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • polyimide membrane treatment conditions
    Chemical treatment parameters that tune proton transport versus mediator blocking are chosen post-fabrication and directly affect the reported power density.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Biofouling is the dominant failure mechanism in conventional microbial fuel cell architectures
    Stated as a revealed finding but used to justify the dual-mode design; no quantitative comparison data shown in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5586 in / 1399 out tokens · 50946 ms · 2026-05-16T02:33:18.280388+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    L. R. Gomez Palacios, A. G. Bracamonte, Development of nano- and microdevices for the next generation of biotechnology, wearables and miniaturized instrumentation. RSC Adv. 12(20), 12806–12822 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RA02008D

    work page doi:10.1039/d2ra02008d 2022

  2. [2]

    A. T. Kutbee, R. R. Bahabry, K. O. Alamoudi, M. T. Ghoneim, M. D. Cordero, et al., Flexible and biocompatible high-performance solid-state micro-battery for implantable orthodontic system. npj Flex. Electron. 1(1), 7 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41528- 017-0008-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41528- 2017

  3. [3]

    J. Ni, A. Dai, Y. Yuan, L. Li, J. Lu, Three-Dimensional Microbatteries beyond Lithium Ion. Matter 2(6), 1366–1376 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2020.04.020

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matt.2020.04.020 2020

  4. [4]

    Santoro, F

    C. Santoro, F. Soavi, A. Serov, C. Arbizzani, P. Atanassov, Self-powered supercapacitive microbial fuel cell: The ultimate way of boosting and harvesting power. Biosens. Bioelectron. 78 229–235 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2015.11.026

    work page doi:10.1016/j.bios.2015.11.026 2016

  5. [5]

    Tekle, A

    Y. Tekle, A. Demeke, Review on microbial fuel cell. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 8, 424–427 (2015)

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    J. Ma, J. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Q. Guo, T. Hu, et al., Progress on anodic modification materials and future development directions in microbial fuel cells. J. Power Sources 556 232486 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232486

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232486 2023

  7. [7]

    J. M. Moradian, Z. Fang, Y.-C. Yong, Recent advances on biomass-fueled microbial fuel cell. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 8(1), 14 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-021- 00365-7

    work page doi:10.1186/s40643-021- 2021

  8. [8]

    Y. Cao, H. Mu, W. Liu, R. Zhang, J. Guo, et al., Electricigens in the anode of microbial fuel cells: pure cultures versus mixed communities. Microb. Cell Fact. 18(1), 39 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-019-1087-z

    work page doi:10.1186/s12934-019-1087-z 2019

  9. [9]

    Parkhey, R

    P. Parkhey, R. Sahu, Microfluidic microbial fuel cells: Recent advancements and future prospects. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 46(4), 3105–3123 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.07.019

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.07.019 2021

  10. [10]

    B. E. Logan, M. J. Wallack, K. Y. Kim, W. He, Y. Feng, et al., Assessment of Microbial Fuel Cell Configurations and Power Densities. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2(8), 206–214 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.5b00180

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.estlett.5b00180 2015

  11. [11]

    O. A. Ibrahim, M. Navarro-Segarra, P. Sadeghi, N. Sabaté, J. P. Esquivel, et al., Microfluidics for Electrochemical Energy Conversion. Chem. Rev. 122(7), 7236–7266 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00499

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00499 2022

  12. [12]

    L. Gong, M. Abbaszadeh Amirdehi, J. M. Sonawane, N. Jia, L. Torres de Oliveira, et al., Mainstreaming microfluidic microbial fuel cells: a biocompatible membrane grown in situ improves performance and versatility. Lab Chip 22(10), 1905–1916 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/D2LC00098A

    work page doi:10.1039/d2lc00098a 1905

  13. [13]

    M. A. Amirdehi, N. Khodaparastasgarabad, H. Landari, M. P. Zarabadi, A. Miled, et al., A High‐Performance Membraneless Microfluidic Microbial Fuel Cell for Stable, Long‐Term Benchtop Operation Under Strong Flow. ChemElectroChem 7(10), 2227– 2235 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.202000040

    work page doi:10.1002/celc.202000040 2020

  14. [14]

    W. Yang, K. K. Lee, S. Choi, A laminar-flow based microbial fuel cell array. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 243 292–297 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2016.11.155

    work page doi:10.1016/j.snb.2016.11.155 2017

  15. [15]

    Scott, Membranes and separators for microbial fuel cells

    K. Scott, Membranes and separators for microbial fuel cells. in Microbial Electrochemical and Fuel Cells 153–178 (Elsevier, 2016). doi:10.1016/B978-1-78242- 375-1.00005-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-78242-375-1.00005-8

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-1-78242- 2016

  16. [16]

    F. Qian, M. Baum, Q. Gu, D. E. Morse, A 1.5 µL microbial fuel cell for on-chip bioelectricity generation. Lab Chip 9(21), 3076 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1039/b910586g

    work page doi:10.1039/b910586g 2009

  17. [17]

    C. A. Machado, G. O. Brown, R. Yang, T. E. Hopkins, J. G. Pribyl, et al., Redox Flow Battery Membranes: Improving Battery Performance by Leveraging Structure–Property Relationships. ACS Energy Lett. 6(1), 158–176 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.0c02205

    work page doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.0c02205 2021

  18. [18]

    Düerkop, H

    D. Düerkop, H. Widdecke, C. Schilde, U. Kunz, A. Schmiemann, Polymer Membranes for All-Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries: A Review. Membranes (Basel). 11(3), 214 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11030214

    work page doi:10.3390/membranes11030214 2021

  19. [19]

    G. L. Soloveichik, Flow Batteries: Current Status and Trends. Chem. Rev. 115(20), 11533–11558 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500720t

    work page doi:10.1021/cr500720t 2015

  20. [20]

    K. B. Lam, E. F. Irwin, K. E. Healy, L. Lin, Bioelectrocatalytic self-assembled thylakoids for micro-power and sensing applications. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 117(2), 480–487 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2005.12.057

    work page doi:10.1016/j.snb.2005.12.057 2006

  21. [21]

    K. B. Lam, E. A. Johnson, M. Chiao, L. Lin, A MEMS Photosynthetic Electrochemical Cell Powered by Subcellular Plant Photosystems. J. Microelectromechanical Syst. 15(5), 1243–1250 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/JMEMS.2006.880296

    work page doi:10.1109/jmems.2006.880296 2006

  22. [22]

    Chiao, K

    M. Chiao, K. B. Lam, L. Lin, Micromachined microbial and photosynthetic fuel cells. J. Micromechanics Microengineering 16(12), 2547–2553 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/16/12/005

    work page doi:10.1088/0960-1317/16/12/005 2006

  23. [23]

    Karnaushenko, T

    D. Karnaushenko, T. Kang, V. K. Bandari, F. Zhu, O. G. Schmidt, 3D Self-Assembled Microelectronic Devices: Concepts, Materials, Applications. Adv. Mater. 1902994 1– 30 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201902994

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.201902994 2019

  24. [24]

    S. Liu, L. Wang, B. Zhang, B. Liu, J. Wang, et al., Novel sulfonated polyimide/polyvinyl alcohol blend membranes for vanadium redox flow battery applications. J. Mater. Chem. A 3(5), 2072–2081 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TA05504G

    work page doi:10.1039/c4ta05504g 2072

  25. [25]

    Huang, S

    X. Huang, S. Zhang, Y. Zhang, H. Zhang, X. Yang, Sulfonated polyimide/chitosan composite membranes for a vanadium redox flow battery: influence of the sulfonation degree of the sulfonated polyimide. Polym. J. 48(8), 905–918 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/pj.2016.42

    work page doi:10.1038/pj.2016.42 2016

  26. [26]

    J. Li, X. Yuan, S. Liu, Z. He, Z. Zhou, et al., A Low-Cost and High-Performance Sulfonated Polyimide Proton-Conductive Membrane for Vanadium Redox Flow/Static Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9(38), 32643–32651 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b07437

    work page doi:10.1021/acsami.7b07437 2017

  27. [27]

    W. Xu, J. Long, J. Liu, H. Luo, H. Duan, et al., A novel porous polyimide membrane with ultrahigh chemical stability for application in vanadium redox flow battery. Chem. Eng. J. 428 131203 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.131203

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cej.2021.131203 2022

  28. [28]

    Karnaushenko, N

    D. Karnaushenko, N. Münzenrieder, D. D. Karnaushenko, B. Koch, A. K. Meyer, et al., Biomimetic Microelectronics for Regenerative Neuronal Cuff Implants. Adv. Mater. 27(43), 6797–6805 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201503696

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.201503696 2015

  29. [29]

    D. D. Karnaushenko, D. Karnaushenko, D. Makarov, O. G. Schmidt, Compact helical antenna for smart implant applications. NPG Asia Mater. 7(6), e188–e188 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/am.2015.53

    work page doi:10.1038/am.2015.53 2015

  30. [30]

    A. I. Egunov, Z. Dou, D. D. Karnaushenko, F. Hebenstreit, N. Kretschmann, et al., Impedimetric Microfluidic Sensor‐in‐a‐Tube for Label‐Free Immune Cell Analysis. Small 17(5), (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202002549

    work page doi:10.1002/smll.202002549 2021

  31. [31]

    Ghosh, A

    E. Ghosh, A. I. Egunov, D. Karnaushenko, M. Medina-Sánchez, O. G. Schmidt, Self- assembled sensor-in-a-tube as a versatile tool for label-free EIS viability investigation of cervical cancer cells. Frequenz 76(11–12), 729–740 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1515/freq-2022-0090

    work page doi:10.1515/freq-2022-0090 2022

  32. [32]

    Choi, H.-S

    S. Choi, H.-S. Lee, Y. Yang, P. Parameswaran, C. I. Torres, et al., A μL-scale micromachined microbial fuel cell having high power density. Lab Chip 11(6), 1110 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/c0lc00494d

    work page doi:10.1039/c0lc00494d 2011

  33. [33]

    Vigolo, T

    D. Vigolo, T. T. Al-Housseiny, Y. Shen, F. O. Akinlawon, S. T. Al-Housseiny, et al., Flow dependent performance of microfluidic microbial fuel cells. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16(24), 12535 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cp01086h

    work page doi:10.1039/c4cp01086h 2014

  34. [34]

    O. G. Schmidt, K. Eberl, Thin solid films roll up into nanotubes. Nature 410(6825), 168–168 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35065525

    work page doi:10.1038/35065525 2001

  35. [35]

    V. Y. Prinz, V. Seleznev, A. . Gutakovsky, A. . Chehovskiy, V. Preobrazhenskii, et al., Free-standing and overgrown InGaAs/GaAs nanotubes, nanohelices and their arrays. Phys. E Low-dimensional Syst. Nanostructures 6(1–4), 828–831 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386-9477(99)00249-0

    work page doi:10.1016/s1386-9477(99)00249-0 2000

  36. [36]

    J. Wang, D. Karnaushenko, M. Medina-Sánchez, Y. Yin, L. Ma, et al., Three- Dimensional Microtubular Devices for Lab-on-a-Chip Sensing Applications. ACS Sensors 4(6), 1476–1496 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.9b00681

    work page doi:10.1021/acssensors.9b00681 2019

  37. [37]

    Lepucki, A

    P. Lepucki, A. I. Egunov, M. Rosenkranz, R. Huber, A. Mirhajivarzaneh, et al., Self‐ Assembled Rolled‐Up Microcoils for nL Microfluidics NMR Spectroscopy. Adv. Mater. Technol. 6(1), 2000679 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.202000679

    work page doi:10.1002/admt.202000679 2021

  38. [38]

    Y. Lee, V. K. Bandari, Z. Li, M. Medina-Sánchez, M. F. Maitz, et al., Nano- biosupercapacitors enable autarkic sensor operation in blood. Nat. Commun. 12(1), 4– 13 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24863-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24863-6 2021

  39. [39]

    Gabler, D

    F. Gabler, D. D. Karnaushenko, D. Karnaushenko, O. G. Schmidt, Magnetic origami creates high performance micro devices. Nat. Commun. 10(1), 3013 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10947-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10947-x 2019

  40. [40]

    C. N. Saggau, F. Gabler, D. D. Karnaushenko, D. Karnaushenko, L. Ma, et al., Wafer‐ Scale High‐Quality Microtubular Devices Fabricated via Dry‐Etching for Optical and Microelectronic Applications. Adv. Mater. 32(37), 2003252 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202003252

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.202003252 2020

  41. [41]

    F. Li, J. Wang, L. Liu, J. Qu, Y. Li, et al., Self-Assembled Flexible and Integratable 3D Microtubular Asymmetric Supercapacitors. Adv. Sci. 6(20), 1901051 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201901051

    work page doi:10.1002/advs.201901051 2019

  42. [42]

    Z. Qu, M. Zhu, Y. Yin, Y. Huang, H. Tang, et al., A Sub-Square-Millimeter Microbattery with Milliampere-Hour-Level Footprint Capacity. Adv. Energy Mater. 12(28), 2200714 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202200714

    work page doi:10.1002/aenm.202200714 2022

  43. [43]

    Ion Harvester

    H. Tang, L. M. M. Ferro, D. D. Karnaushenko, O. Selyshchev, X. Wang, et al., An “Ion Harvester” Battery in Soil Empowered by a Microfluidic Pump and Interlayer Confinement within Micro‐Swiss‐Rolls. Adv. Funct. Mater. 35(14), (2025). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202418872

    work page doi:10.1002/adfm.202418872 2025

  44. [44]

    M. Zhu, J. Hu, Q. Lu, H. Dong, D. D. Karnaushenko, et al., A Patternable and In Situ Formed Polymeric Zinc Blanket for a Reversible Zinc Anode in a Skin‐Mountable Microbattery. Adv. Mater. 33(8), 2007497 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202007497

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.202007497 2021

  45. [45]

    Karnaushenko, T

    D. Karnaushenko, T. Kang, O. G. Schmidt, Shapeable Material Technologies for 3D Self-Assembly of Mesoscale Electronics. Adv. Mater. Technol. 4(4), 1–29 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.201800692

    work page doi:10.1002/admt.201800692 2019

  46. [46]

    X. Lai, M. Yang, H. Wu, D. Li, Modular Microfluidics: Current Status and Future Prospects. Micromachines 13(8), 1–22 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13081363

    work page doi:10.3390/mi13081363 2022

  47. [47]

    H. Ren, C. I. Torres, P. Parameswaran, B. E. Rittmann, J. Chae, Improved current and power density with a micro-scale microbial fuel cell due to a small characteristic length. Biosens. Bioelectron. 61 587–592 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2014.05.037

    work page doi:10.1016/j.bios.2014.05.037 2014

  48. [48]

    Jiang, M

    H. Jiang, M. A. Ali, Z. Xu, L. J. Halverson, L. Dong, Integrated Microfluidic Flow- Through Microbial Fuel Cells. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 41208 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41208

    work page doi:10.1038/srep41208 2017

  49. [49]

    J. E. Mink, J. P. Rojas, B. E. Logan, M. M. Hussain, Vertically Grown Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube Anode and Nickel Silicide Integrated High Performance Microsized (1.25 μL) Microbial Fuel Cell. Nano Lett. 12(2), 791–795 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl203801h

    work page doi:10.1021/nl203801h 2012

  50. [50]

    Şen-Doğan, M

    B. Şen-Doğan, M. Okan, N. Afşar-Erkal, E. Özgür, Ö. Zorlu, et al., Enhancement of the Start-Up Time for Microliter-Scale Microbial Fuel Cells (µMFCs) via the Surface Modification of Gold Electrodes. Micromachines 11(7), 703 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11070703

    work page doi:10.3390/mi11070703 2020

  51. [51]

    Murugesan, P

    A. Murugesan, P. Mahendran, High-Performance Polyimides with Pendant Fluorenylidene Groups: Synthesis, Characterization and Adsorption Behaviour. J. Polym. Environ. 28(9), 2393–2409 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-020-01777- w

    work page doi:10.1007/s10924-020-01777- 2020

  52. [52]

    K. A. Mauritz, R. B. Moore, State of Understanding of Nafion. Chem. Rev. 104(10), 4535–4586 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1021/cr0207123

    work page doi:10.1021/cr0207123 2004

  53. [53]

    Kusoglu, A

    A. Kusoglu, A. Z. Weber, New Insights into Perfluorinated Sulfonic-Acid Ionomers. Chem. Rev. 117(3), 987–1104 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00159

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00159 2017

  54. [54]

    S. G. A. Flimban, S. H. A. Hassan, M. M. Rahman, S.-E. Oh, The effect of Nafion membrane fouling on the power generation of a microbial fuel cell. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 45(25), 13643–13651 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.02.097

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.02.097 2020

  55. [55]

    Zang, X.-L

    L. Zang, X.-L. Yang, H. Xu, Y.-G. Xia, H.-L. Song, A novel integrated microbial fuel cell-membrane bioreactor (MFC-MBR) for controlling the spread of antibiotic and antibiotic resistance genes while simultaneously alleviating membrane fouling. Chem. Eng. J. 487 150578 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.150578

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cej.2024.150578 2024

  56. [56]

    G. Gu, X. Yang, Y. Li, J. Guo, J. Huang, et al., Advanced zwitterionic polymeric membranes for diverse applications beyond antifouling. Sep. Purif. Technol. 356 129848 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2024.129848 Supporting materials Thin-Film-Engineered Self-Assembly of 3D Coaxial Microfluidics with a Tunable Polyimide Membrane for Bioelectronic ...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2024.129848 2025