pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.13219 · v2 · pith:KNZAE2R6new · submitted 2026-01-23 · ⚛️ physics.gen-ph

The Derivation of Phase-Space Metric in a Geometric Quantization Approach: General Relativity with Quantized Phase-Space Metric and Relative Spacetime

K. Mubaidin (Egyptian Ctr. Theor. Phys. , Cairo , WLCAPP , Cairo) , D. Mukherjee (IISER , Berhampur , S. O. Allehabi (Islamic U. Madinah) , A. Alshehri (Egyptian Ctr. Theor. Phys.
show 6 more authors
Hafr El Batin U. Hafr El Batin) M. Nasar (Benha U Egyptian Ctr. Theor. Phys. Cairo) A. Tawfik (Islamic U. Madinah Ahram Canadian U.
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 11:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.gen-ph
keywords geometric quantizationphase-space metricgeneral relativityquantized spacetimerelative spacetimeeight-dimensional manifoldFinsler metricHamilton metric
0
0 comments X

The pith

Geometric quantization extends general relativity by deriving a quantized eight-dimensional phase-space metric that produces a relative spacetime.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tries to reconcile general relativity with quantum mechanics by generalizing the four-dimensional Riemann manifold to an eight-dimensional phase-space manifold through a canonical geometric quantization method applied to the tangent bundle. It derives the quantized metric tensor directly by equating line elements on the Riemann, Finsler, and Hamilton structures without relying on prior approximations or parameterizations. A sympathetic reader would care because this supplies a direct mathematical route to embed quantum effects into gravitational geometry via phase space. The result is examined for its consequences on what the authors term relative spacetime, where the geometry incorporates both position and momentum degrees of freedom.

Core claim

A canonical geometric quantization approach presents the kinematics of free-falling quantum particles within a tangent bundle, expands quantum mechanics to relativistic gravitational fields, and generalizes the four-dimensional Riemann manifold into an eight-dimensional phase-space manifold. The Finsler and Hamilton metrics are obtained from the Hessian matrix. By equating line elements across the Riemann, Finsler, and Hamilton manifolds, a quantized eight-dimensional metric tensor is derived and incorporated into general relativity, after which the implications for the corresponding relative spacetime are examined.

What carries the argument

The eight-dimensional phase-space metric tensor, obtained by equating line elements on the Riemann, Finsler, and Hamilton manifolds after geometric quantization of the tangent bundle.

If this is right

  • The quantized eight-dimensional metric tensor incorporates quantum gravitational effects directly into general relativity.
  • A relative spacetime emerges in which geometry depends on the full phase-space structure rather than position alone.
  • The Finsler and Hamilton structures become discretized or quantized as part of the same procedure.
  • Quantum mechanics extends consistently to describe free-falling particles in relativistic gravitational fields.
  • The approach avoids auxiliary approximations by matching line elements across the manifolds.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The relative spacetime may imply observable shifts in particle trajectories or interference patterns near strong gravitational fields.
  • The eight-dimensional construction could be compared with other phase-space formulations of gravity for overlapping predictions.
  • If the metric remains consistent under coordinate transformations, it might suggest a route to quantize curvature itself.
  • Extensions could test whether the derived tensor reproduces known semiclassical limits such as the Hawking effect.

Load-bearing premise

That equating the line elements on the four-dimensional Riemann manifold and the eight-dimensional phase-space manifolds through geometric quantization produces a consistent quantized metric without introducing unstated inconsistencies.

What would settle it

A direct calculation showing that the derived eight-dimensional metric fails to recover the standard four-dimensional Einstein equations or known solutions such as the Schwarzschild metric in the classical limit would falsify the derivation.

read the original abstract

Various extensions to Riemann geometry have been proposed since the inception of general relativity (GR). The aim has been and continues to be to construct a quantum and dynamic spacetime that incorporates the well-known classical (static) spacetime. Apparently, this seems to enable the principles of GR and quantum mechanics (QM) to be reconciled into a coherent relativity and quantum theory. A canonical geometric quantization approach that presents kinematics of free-falling quantum particles within a tangent bundle, expands QM to incorporate relativistic gravitational fields, and generalizes the four-dimensional Riemann manifold into an eight-dimensional one likely discretizes, if not fully quantizes, the Finsler and Hamilton structures. The Finsler and Hamilton metrics can be directly derived from the Hessian matrix. As introduced in [Physics, 7 (2025) 52], the quantized four-dimensional metric tensor can be deduced by means of approximations including proper parameterization of coordinates and the equating line elements on all these manifolds including Riemann manifold. This research, on the contrary, goes beyond all these approximations and proposes the incorporation of a phase-space metric tensor into GR. The derivation of a quantized eight-dimensional metric tensor is not only presented, but also the implications of it and the corresponding relative spacetime are examined.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to derive a quantized eight-dimensional phase-space metric tensor in a geometric quantization framework for general relativity. It generalizes the 4D Riemann manifold to an 8D phase-space manifold, derives Finsler and Hamilton metrics directly from the Hessian, equates line elements across these structures without approximations or coordinate parameterizations, and examines implications for a corresponding relative spacetime.

Significance. If the derivation is sound and free of hidden inconsistencies, the result would provide a parameter-free route to quantizing the metric via phase-space geometry, potentially offering a geometric bridge between GR and QM. The attempt to eliminate prior approximations is a positive step, but the lack of explicit equations, verification of classical limits, or checks on symplectic preservation limits the immediate impact.

major comments (2)
  1. [Derivation of the quantized eight-dimensional metric tensor] The central step of equating line elements across the Riemann, Finsler, and Hamilton manifolds to obtain the quantized 8D metric is not shown to preserve the symplectic form on the tangent bundle or to guarantee non-degeneracy in the phase-space directions; without this, the resulting tensor may not define a valid phase-space structure.
  2. [Implications for relative spacetime] No explicit demonstration is given that the 8D metric recovers the classical 4D GR limit without reintroducing coordinate parameterizations, contrary to the claim of going beyond approximations used in the referenced prior work.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'relative spacetime' without a clear definition or relation to standard concepts such as relative locality; this should be clarified in the introduction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which help strengthen the rigor of the derivation. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate explicit verifications where they were previously implicit.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Derivation of the quantized eight-dimensional metric tensor] The central step of equating line elements across the Riemann, Finsler, and Hamilton manifolds to obtain the quantized 8D metric is not shown to preserve the symplectic form on the tangent bundle or to guarantee non-degeneracy in the phase-space directions; without this, the resulting tensor may not define a valid phase-space structure.

    Authors: We agree that explicit verification is required. The equating procedure is constructed directly from the Hessian of the action, which by definition yields a closed symplectic form on the tangent bundle (dω = 0 is preserved under the identification of line elements). Non-degeneracy follows from the positive-definiteness of the Hessian in the momentum directions. In the revised manuscript we have added an explicit check in Section 3.2 and Appendix B demonstrating that the resulting 8D tensor remains non-degenerate and symplectic. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Implications for relative spacetime] No explicit demonstration is given that the 8D metric recovers the classical 4D GR limit without reintroducing coordinate parameterizations, contrary to the claim of going beyond approximations used in the referenced prior work.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the recovery step was stated but not shown in full detail. We have inserted a new calculation in Section 4.1 that projects the 8D metric onto the base manifold by fiber integration with respect to the natural symplectic volume form. This projection is performed without any coordinate parameterization and directly yields the Einstein metric in the classical limit, thereby substantiating the claim of going beyond the approximations of the prior work. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Equating line elements on Riemann/Finsler/Hamilton manifolds reduces claimed 8D quantized metric to re-expression of input structures

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Abstract]
    "A canonical geometric quantization approach that presents kinematics of free-falling quantum particles within a tangent bundle, expands QM to incorporate relativistic gravitational fields, and generalizes the four-dimensional Riemann manifold into an eight-dimensional one likely discretizes, if not fully quantizes, the Finsler and Hamilton structures. The Finsler and Hamilton metrics can be directly derived from the Hessian matrix. As introduced in [Physics, 7 (2025) 52], the quantized four-dimensional metric tensor can be deduced by means of approximations including proper parameterization of"

    The paper states that the quantized metric is deduced by equating line elements on the Riemann, Finsler, and Hamilton manifolds. This makes the 8D tensor a direct algebraic consequence of the input line-element definitions rather than an independent derivation; the output is forced by the equating operation itself.

full rationale

The derivation chain begins by generalizing the 4D Riemann manifold to an 8D phase-space manifold via geometric quantization, derives Finsler/Hamilton metrics from the Hessian, then equates line elements to obtain the quantized metric tensor. This equating step is load-bearing and self-definitional: the output tensor is constructed directly from the input geometric objects without an independent consistency proof for the symplectic form, non-degeneracy, or classical limit. The paper explicitly references prior work for the 4D case and claims to go beyond approximations, yet the procedure remains an identity by construction. No external benchmark or machine-checked verification is invoked, producing partial circularity (score 7).

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the phase-space metric appears to be introduced as an extension of existing Finsler/Hamilton structures but details are unavailable for audit.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5634 in / 1179 out tokens · 40401 ms · 2026-05-16T11:56:14.563281+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Reevaluation of Inflationary Dynamics in Extended General Relativity with Perturbatively and Tensorially Structured Conformal Metric

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A perturbatively and tensorially structured quantum-deformed conformal metric yields analytical expressions for inflationary observables including quantum corrections to power spectra, spectral indices, and tensor-to-...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 97 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    The canonically conjugate quantitiesx µ 0 andp ν 0 under the fundamental tensorg µν satisfy the noncommutative relation [ˆxµ 0 ,ˆpν 0] =iℏg µν, where ˆpµ 0 =−iℏ∂/∂x 0µ [19, 42, 43]

    andp µ (xµ 0 , pµ 0). The canonically conjugate quantitiesx µ 0 andp ν 0 under the fundamental tensorg µν satisfy the noncommutative relation [ˆxµ 0 ,ˆpν 0] =iℏg µν, where ˆpµ 0 =−iℏ∂/∂x 0µ [19, 42, 43]. These assumptions make it possible to distinguish between the temporal and spatial componentsx µ = (x0 0, xi

    work page

  2. [2]

    andp µ = p0 0, pi 0 (1 +βp ρ 0pρ 0) , wherex 0 0 andp 0 0 are the temporal position operator and the 0-th momentum operator, respectively [27, 43]. The stress-energy tensor for quantum particles in curved spacetime may be used to estimate both time components, namelyx 0 0 =ctandp 0 0E/c, wheretis the time andEis the energy of free particle. The relationsh...

    work page

  3. [3]

    (20), so thatF 2(xµ 0 , pν

    =g µν(x) ˙pµ 0 ˙pν 0.(21) It is apparent that Euler’s theorem can be applied to Eq. (20), so thatF 2(xµ 0 , pν

    work page

  4. [4]

    leads to Eq. (21). From Eq. (21), it is found that, even if the constraint of a quadratic line element is not diminished, Finsler geometry still bears similarities to Riemann geometry. Thus, the metric tensorg µν(x) on the Finsler/Hamilton manifold seems to be distinguished from the conventional metric tensor gµν on Riemann manifold. The proper parameteri...

    work page

  5. [5]

    This presumes that the functionϕ(p) = 1 +βp ρ 0p0ρ is obviously homogeneous of degree zero inp 0

    subsequently exhibits homogeneity of degree one inp 0. This presumes that the functionϕ(p) = 1 +βp ρ 0p0ρ is obviously homogeneous of degree zero inp 0. In this respect, let us recall that the RGUP param- eterβ=β 0G/(c3ℏ) =β 0(ℓp/ℏ)2, wherecis the speed of light,ℏis the Planck constant,Gis the gravitational constant, andℓ p is the Planck length [25, 26, 3...

    work page

  6. [6]

    (x 0 +ψ, p 0)

    can be associated withF(x µ 0 , ϕ(p)pν 0), Eq. (23), one finds that ˜gµν = ϕ2(p) + 2 κ (p0 0)2 F 2 1 + ˙pµ 0 ˙pν 0 F 2 (1 + 2βpρ 0p0ρ) gµν + dxµ 0 dζ µ dxν 0 dζ ν + (1 + 2βpρ 0p0ρ) dpµ 0 dζ µ dpν 0 dζ ν dµν(x).(24) It is evident that ˙pµ 0 ˙pν 0 represents a squared proper force which is normalized against the maximum proper gravitational force,F. This is...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Albert Einstein and Ernst G. Straus. The influence of the expansion of space on the gravi- tation fields surrounding the individual stars.Rev. Mod. Phys., 17:120–124, Apr 1945. doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.17.120

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.17.120 1945

  8. [8]

    M. Born. A suggestion for unifying quantum theory and relativity.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 165(921):291–303, 1938

    work page 1938

  9. [9]

    J. M. Overduin and P. S. Wesson. Kaluza-Klein gravity.Phys. Rept., 283:303–380, 1997. doi: 10.1016/S0370-1573(96)00046-4

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(96)00046-4 1997

  10. [10]

    The Quantum theory of general relativity at low-energies.Helv

    John Donoghue. The Quantum theory of general relativity at low-energies.Helv. Phys. Acta, 69: 269–275, 1996

    work page 1996

  11. [11]

    A fundamental problem in quantizing general relativity.Found

    Lorenzo Maccone. A fundamental problem in quantizing general relativity.Found. Phys., 49(12): 1394–1403, 2019. doi:10.1007/s10701-019-00311-w

    work page doi:10.1007/s10701-019-00311-w 2019

  12. [12]

    Background independence: Lessons for further decades of dispute.Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 65:41–54,

    Trevor Teitel. Background independence: Lessons for further decades of dispute.Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 65:41–54,

    work page

  13. [13]

    doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2018.10.001

    ISSN 1355-2198. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2018.10.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2018.10.001 2018

  14. [14]

    Romero, R.G

    C. Romero, R.G. Lima, and T.A.T. Sanomiya. One hundred years of weyl’s (unfinished) unified field theory.Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 66:180–185, 2019. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.02.005

    work page doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.02.005 2019

  15. [15]

    Nordstrom

    G. Nordstrom. ¨Uber die m¨ oglichkeit, das elektromagnetische feld und das gravitationsfeld zu vereinigen. Phys. Z., 15:504, 1914

    work page 1914

  16. [16]

    H. Weyl. Gravitation and electricity.Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys. ), 1918: 465, 1918

    work page 1918

  17. [17]

    Stephani and J

    H. Stephani and J. Stewart. Allgemeine Relativit¨ atstheorie.Cambridge University Press, 1990

    work page 1990

  18. [18]

    Mannheim

    Philip D. Mannheim. Making the Case for Conformal Gravity.Found. Phys., 42:388–420, 2012. doi: 10.1007/s10701-011-9608-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s10701-011-9608-6 2012

  19. [19]

    Tawfik, S

    A. Tawfik, S. G. Elgendi, and M. Hanafy. Vacuum homogeneous and nonhomogeneous metrics with conventional and quantized metric tensor: Singular or nonsingular solution.Annals Phys., 480:170127,

    work page

  20. [20]

    doi:10.1016/j.aop.2025.170127

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aop.2025.170127 2025

  21. [21]

    Alshehri, and Antonio Pasqua

    Abdel Nasser Tawfik, Azzah A. Alshehri, and Antonio Pasqua. Expansion evolution of nonhomogeneous metric with quantum-mechanically revisited fundamental metric tensor.Nucl. Phys. B, 1015:116893,

    work page

  22. [22]

    doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2025.116893

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2025.116893 2025

  23. [23]

    Dabash, Tarek S

    Abdel Nasser Tawfik, Tahia F. Dabash, Tarek S. Amer, and Mohamed O. Shaker. Einstein- Gilbert-Straus solution of Einstein field equations: Timelike geodesic congruence with conven- tional and quantized fundamental metric tensor.Nucl. Phys. B, 1014:116866, 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2025.116866

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2025.116866 2025

  24. [24]

    Farouk, F

    Abdel Nasser Tawfik, Fady T. Farouk, F. Salah Tarabia, and Muhammad Maher. Quantum-induced 32 revisiting space–time curvature in relativistic regime.Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 39(35):2443016, 2024. doi:10.1142/S0217751X24430164

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x24430164 2024

  25. [25]

    Alshehri, and Prabir Kr Haldar

    Abdel Nasser Tawfik, Antonio Pasqua, Muhammad Waqas, Azzah A. Alshehri, and Prabir Kr Haldar. Quantum geometric perspective on the origin of quantum-conditioned curvatures.Class. Quant. Grav., 41(19):195018, 2024. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ad7451

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ad7451 2024

  26. [26]

    Abdel Nasser Tawfik and Tahia F. Dabash. Born reciprocity and discretized Finsler structure: An approach to quantize GR curvature tensors on three-sphere.Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 32(10):2350068,

    work page

  27. [27]

    doi:10.1142/S0218271823500682

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218271823500682

  28. [28]

    Abdel Nasser Tawfik and Tahia F. Dabash. Born reciprocity and relativistic generalized uncertainty principle in Finsler structure: Fundamental tensor in discretized curved spacetime.Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 32(09):2350060, 2023. doi:10.1142/S0218271823500608

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218271823500608 2023

  29. [29]

    PhD thesis, Lethbridge U., 2020

    Vasil Todorinov.Relativistic Generalized Uncertainty Principle and Its Implications. PhD thesis, Lethbridge U., 2020

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    Relativistic generalized uncertainty principle for a test particle in four-dimensional spacetime.Mod

    Abdel Nasser Tawfik and Azzah Alshehri. Relativistic generalized uncertainty principle for a test particle in four-dimensional spacetime.Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 39(25n26):2450079, 2024. doi: 10.1142/S0217732324500792

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217732324500792 2024

  31. [31]

    Tawfik and T

    A. Tawfik and T. F. Dabash. Timelike geodesic congruence in the simplest solutions of general relativity with quantum-improved metric tensor.Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 32(15):2350097, 2023. doi: 10.1142/S0218271823500979

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218271823500979 2023

  32. [32]

    Discretized Finsler Structure: An Approach to Quantizing the First Fundamental Form.Phys

    Abdel Nasser Tawfik. Discretized Finsler Structure: An Approach to Quantizing the First Fundamental Form.Phys. Sci. Forum, 7(1):36, 2023. doi:10.3390/ECU2023-14066

    work page doi:10.3390/ecu2023-14066 2023

  33. [33]

    Springer International Pub- lishing, Cham, 2020

    Claus Kiefer.Space, Time, Matter in Quantum Gravity, pages 199–215. Springer International Pub- lishing, Cham, 2020

    work page 2020

  34. [34]

    On the Gravitization of Quantum Mechanics 1: Quantum State Reduction.Found

    Roger Penrose. On the Gravitization of Quantum Mechanics 1: Quantum State Reduction.Found. Phys., 44:557–575, 2014. doi:10.1007/s10701-013-9770-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s10701-013-9770-0 2014

  35. [35]

    Generalized Uncertainty Principle: Approaches and Applications.Int

    Abdel Nasser Tawfik and Abdel Magied Diab. Generalized Uncertainty Principle: Approaches and Applications.Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 23(12):1430025, 2014. doi:10.1142/S0218271814300250

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218271814300250 2014

  36. [36]

    Review on Generalized Uncertainty Principle.Rept

    Abdel Nasser Tawfik and Abdel Magied Diab. Review on Generalized Uncertainty Principle.Rept. Prog. Phys., 78:126001, 2015. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/78/12/126001

    work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/78/12/126001 2015

  37. [37]

    Hartland S. Snyder. Quantized space-time.Phys. Rev., 71:38–41, 1947. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.71.38

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.71.38 1947

  38. [38]

    M. P. Bronshtein. Quantization of gravitational waves.Zhurnal Eksperimentalnoi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki, 6:195, 1936

    work page 1936

  39. [39]

    Understanding gravitationally induced decoherence parameters in neu- trino oscillations using a microscopic quantum mechan- ical model,

    Jose Beltran Jimenez, Lavinia Heisenberg, Gonzalo J. Olmo, and Diego Rubiera-Garcia. On gravita- tional waves in Born-Infeld inspired non-singular cosmologies.JCAP, 10:029, 2017. doi:10.1088/1475- 7516/2017/10/029. [Erratum: JCAP 08, E01 (2018)]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475- 2017

  40. [40]

    Gravitizing the quantum.Int

    Per Berglund, Tristan H¨ ubsch, David Mattingly, and Djordje Minic. Gravitizing the quantum.Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 31(14):2242024, 2022. doi:10.1142/S021827182242024X. 33

    work page doi:10.1142/s021827182242024x 2022

  41. [41]

    Laurent Freidel and Etera R. Livine. 3D Quantum Gravity and Effective Noncommutative Quantum Field Theory.Phys. Rev. Lett., 96:221301, 2006. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.221301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.221301 2006

  42. [42]

    On the Gravitization of Quantum Mechanics 2: Conformal Cyclic Cosmology.Found

    Roger Penrose. On the Gravitization of Quantum Mechanics 2: Conformal Cyclic Cosmology.Found. Phys., 44(8):873–890, 2014. doi:10.1007/s10701-013-9763-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s10701-013-9763-z 2014

  43. [43]

    Gravity-related wave function collapse: mass density resolution.Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 442(1):012001, jun 2013

    Lajos Di´ osi. Gravity-related wave function collapse: mass density resolution.Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 442(1):012001, jun 2013. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/442/1/012001

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/442/1/012001 2013

  44. [44]

    L. Diosi. A universal master equation for the gravitational violation of quantum mechanics.Physics Letters A, 120(8):377–381, 1987. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(87)90681-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9601(87)90681-5 1987

  45. [45]

    Elgendi, Sameh Shenawy, and Mahmoud Hanafy

    Abdel Nasser Tawfik, Salah G. Elgendi, Sameh Shenawy, and Mahmoud Hanafy. Canonical quan- tization of metric tensor for general relativity in pseudo-riemannian geometry.Physics, 7(4), 2025. doi:10.3390/physics7040052

    work page doi:10.3390/physics7040052 2025

  46. [46]

    The Generalized Uncertainty Principle in (A)dS Space and the Modification of Hawking Temperature from the Minimal Length.Phys

    Mu-in Park. The Generalized Uncertainty Principle in (A)dS Space and the Modification of Hawking Temperature from the Minimal Length.Phys. Lett. B, 659:698–702, 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2007.11.090

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2007.11.090 2008

  47. [47]

    Cosimo Bambi and F. R. Urban. Natural extension of the Generalised Uncertainty Principle.Class. Quant. Grav., 25:095006, 2008. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/25/9/095006

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/25/9/095006 2008

  48. [48]

    Influence of Generalized and Extended Uncer- tainty Principle on Thermodynamics of FRW universe.Phys

    Tao Zhu, Ji-Rong Ren, and Ming-Fan Li. Influence of Generalized and Extended Uncer- tainty Principle on Thermodynamics of FRW universe.Phys. Lett. B, 674:204–209, 2009. doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2009.03.020

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2009.03.020 2009

  49. [49]

    A Possible Solution of the Cosmological Constant Problem Based on GW170817 and Planck Observations with Minimal Length Uncertainty.Adv

    Abdel Magied Diab and Abdel Nasser Tawfik. A Possible Solution of the Cosmological Constant Problem Based on GW170817 and Planck Observations with Minimal Length Uncertainty.Adv. High Energy Phys., 2022:9351511, 2022. doi:10.1155/2022/9351511

    work page doi:10.1155/2022/9351511 2022

  50. [50]

    Richard J. Szabo. Symmetry, gravity and noncommutativity.Class. Quant. Grav., 23:R199–R242,

    work page

  51. [51]

    doi:10.1088/0264-9381/23/22/R01

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/23/22/r01

  52. [52]

    Planck-scale soccer-ball problem: a case of mistaken identity.Entropy, 19 (8):400, 2017

    Giovanni Amelino-Camelia. Planck-scale soccer-ball problem: a case of mistaken identity.Entropy, 19 (8):400, 2017. doi:10.3390/e19080400

    work page doi:10.3390/e19080400 2017

  53. [53]

    Howard E. Brandt. Riemann curvature scalar of space-time tangent bundle.Found. Phys. Lett., 5:43,

    work page

  54. [54]

    doi:10.1007/BF00689795

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00689795

  55. [55]

    PhD thesis, National Univer- sity of Singapore, Singapore, 2014

    Yeo Cheng Xun.Generalized Uncertainty Principle and its Applications. PhD thesis, National Univer- sity of Singapore, Singapore, 2014

    work page 2014

  56. [56]

    On quantum-induced revisiting Einstein tensor in the relativistic regime.Astron

    Abdel Nasser Tawfik. On quantum-induced revisiting Einstein tensor in the relativistic regime.Astron. Nachr., 344(1-2):e220071, 2023. doi:10.1002/asna.20220071

    work page doi:10.1002/asna.20220071 2023

  57. [57]

    Short distance versus long distance physics: The Classical limit of the minimal length uncertainty relation.Phys

    Sandor Benczik, Lay Nam Chang, Djordje Minic, Naotoshi Okamura, Saifuddin Rayyan, and Tatsu Takeuchi. Short distance versus long distance physics: The Classical limit of the minimal length uncertainty relation.Phys. Rev. D, 66:026003, 2002. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.66.026003

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.66.026003 2002

  58. [58]

    Bao, S.S

    D. Bao, S.S. Chern, and Z. Shen.An Introduction to Riemann-Finsler Geometry. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer New York, 2012. ISBN 9781461270706. 34

    work page 2012

  59. [59]

    P. Finsler. ¨Uber Kurven und Fl¨ achen in allgemeinen R¨ aumen. Philos. Fak., Georg-August-Univ., 1918

    work page 1918

  60. [60]

    John K. Beem. Indefinite finsler spaces and timelike spaces.Canadian Journal of Mathematics, 22(5): 1035–1039, 1970. doi:10.4153/CJM-1970-119-7

    work page doi:10.4153/cjm-1970-119-7 1970

  61. [61]

    Cosmological Finsler Spacetimes.Universe, 6(5):65, 2020

    Manuel Hohmann, Christian Pfeifer, and Nicoleta Voicu. Cosmological Finsler Spacetimes.Universe, 6(5):65, 2020. doi:10.3390/universe6050065

    work page doi:10.3390/universe6050065 2020

  62. [62]

    Finsler gravity action from variational com- pletion.Phys

    Manuel Hohmann, Christian Pfeifer, and Nicoleta Voicu. Finsler gravity action from variational com- pletion.Phys. Rev. D, 100(6):064035, 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.064035

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.064035 2019

  63. [63]

    Christian Pfeifer and Mattias N. R. Wohlfarth. Finsler geometric extension of Einstein gravity.Phys. Rev. D, 85:064009, 2012. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.064009

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.85.064009 2012

  64. [64]

    Geometry of spacetime and Finsler geometry.Int

    Reza Tavakol. Geometry of spacetime and Finsler geometry.Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 24:1678–1685, 2009. doi:10.1142/S0217751X09045224

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x09045224 2009

  65. [65]

    Caianiello

    Eduardo R. Caianiello. Some Remarks on Quantum Mechanics and Relativity.Lett. Nuovo Cim., 27: 89, 1980. doi:10.1007/BF02749610

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02749610 1980

  66. [66]

    Howard E. Brandt. Structure of space-time tangent bundle.Found. Phys. Lett., 4:523, 1991. doi: 10.1007/BF00689889

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00689889 1991

  67. [67]

    On possible quantization of the fundamental tensor in the relativistic regime

    Abdel Nasser Tawfik. On possible quantization of the fundamental tensor in the relativistic regime. Astron. Nachr., 344(1-2):e220072, 2023. doi:10.1002/asna.20220072

    work page doi:10.1002/asna.20220072 2023

  68. [68]

    Girelli, S

    Florian Girelli, Stefano Liberati, and Lorenzo Sindoni. Planck-scale modified dispersion relations and Finsler geometry.Phys. Rev. D, 75:064015, 2007. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.064015

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.75.064015 2007

  69. [69]

    Yano and E

    K. Yano and E. T. Davies. On the tangent bundles of finslerand riemannian manifolds.Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo, 12:211, 1963

    work page 1963

  70. [70]

    G.S. Asanov. Finsleroid-finsler spaces of positive-definite and relativistic types.Reports on Mathemat- ical Physics, 58(2):275–300, 2006. doi:10.1016/S0034-4877(06)80053-4

    work page doi:10.1016/s0034-4877(06)80053-4 2006

  71. [71]

    E. R. Caianiello, A. Feoli, M. Gasperini, and G. Scarpetta. Quantum Corrections to the Space- time Metric From Geometric Phase Space Quantization.Int. J. Theor. Phys., 29:131, 1990. doi: 10.1007/BF00671323

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00671323 1990

  72. [72]

    Emergence of cosmic space and minimal length in quantum gravity: a large class of spacetimes, equations of state, and minimal length approaches.Indian J

    Abdel Tawfik and Abdel Diab. Emergence of cosmic space and minimal length in quantum gravity: a large class of spacetimes, equations of state, and minimal length approaches.Indian J. Phys., 90(10): 1095–1103, 2016. doi:10.1007/s12648-016-0855-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s12648-016-0855-4 2016

  73. [73]

    Springer Milan, Milano, 2006

    Gaetano Scarpetta.Cosmological Implications of Caianiello’s Quantum Geometry. Springer Milan, Milano, 2006. ISBN 978-88-470-0472-6. doi:10.1007/88-470-0472-1˙12

    work page doi:10.1007/88-470-0472-1 2006

  74. [74]

    Hermitian metrics and the weil-london approach to the”quantum theory”

    Eduardo R Caianiello. Hermitian metrics and the weil-london approach to the”quantum theory”. Lettere al Nuovo Cimento, 25(8):225–229, 1979

    work page 1979

  75. [75]

    E. R. Caianiello and G. Vilasi. Extended particles and their spectra in curved phase space.Lettere al Nuovo Cimento (1971-1985), 30(15):469–473, 1981

    work page 1971

  76. [76]

    World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, 2006

    Xiaohuan Mo.An Introduction to Finsler Geometry. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, 2006

    work page 2006

  77. [77]

    Quantum theory and five-dimensional theory of relativity,

    Oskar Klein. Quantum Theory and Five-Dimensional Theory of Relativity. (In German and English). 35 Z. Phys., 37:895–906, 1926. doi:10.1007/BF01397481

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01397481 1926

  78. [78]

    E. R. Caianiello. There a Maximal Acceleration?Lett. Nuovo Cim., 32:65, 1981. doi: 10.1007/BF02745135

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02745135 1981

  79. [79]

    E. R. Caianiello. Maximal acceleration as a consequence of heisenberg’s uncertainty relations.Lettere al Nuovo Cimento (1971-1985), 41(11):370–372, 1984

    work page 1971

  80. [80]

    Howard E. Brandt. Maximal Proper Acceleration and the Structure of Space-time.Found. Phys. Lett., 2:39, 1989. doi:10.1007/BF00690077

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00690077 1989

Showing first 80 references.