pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.17511 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-19 · ⚛️ physics.atom-ph

The Stark effect in molecular Rydberg states: Calculation of Rydberg-Stark manifolds of H₂ and D₂ including fine and hyperfine structures

Ioana Doran , Leon Jeckel , Maximilian Beyer , Christian Jungen , Fr\'ed\'eric Merkt This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 20:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.atom-ph
keywords Rydberg statesStark effecthyperfine structuremolecular hydrogenquantum defect theoryfine structure
0
0 comments X

The pith

Hyperfine structure splits Rydberg-Stark states by the ion core's Fermi-contact splitting without changing the shifts.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper presents calculations of the Stark effect in high-n Rydberg states of H2 and D2 that include fine and hyperfine structures. Using multichannel quantum-defect theory for field-free energies and matrix diagonalization for field-induced shifts, it demonstrates that hyperfine interactions split each Stark manifold component by nearly the exact Fermi-contact hyperfine splitting of the molecular ion core. Molecular rotation, through its couplings to electron spin and Rydberg electron motion, produces splittings that vary with the particular Stark state and deviate from the ion core's spin-rotation splitting. These results clarify how nuclear spins and rotation affect spectra observed in electric fields.

Core claim

The hyperfine interaction alone does not significantly modify the Stark effect but splits each Stark state by almost exactly the hyperfine Fermi-contact splitting of the ion core. The effect of the molecular rotation induces Stark-state specific splittings that significantly differ from the spin-rotation splitting of the (N+=2) ion core.

What carries the argument

Matrix diagonalization of the Stark Hamiltonian including hyperfine terms after determining field-free energies via multichannel quantum-defect theory and long-range polarization models, followed by angular-momentum frame transformations.

If this is right

  • The hyperfine splitting remains constant across Stark states for N+=0 cores.
  • Rotation causes varying splittings in N+=2 states that can be distinguished experimentally.
  • Line positions and intensities in single or multiphoton excitation can be predicted accurately.
  • Comparison between ortho-D2 and para-H2 reveals separate roles of hyperfine and rotational effects.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar calculations could extend to other homonuclear molecules to predict their Rydberg spectra in fields.
  • These distinctions might help in assigning complex spectra in astrophysical or laboratory plasmas involving molecular ions.
  • Testing against high-resolution laser spectroscopy would validate the separation of effects.

Load-bearing premise

Long-range polarization models and multichannel quantum-defect theory provide accurate field-free energies of the n l Rydberg states, with angular-momentum frame transformations correctly mapping to observable positions and intensities.

What would settle it

Measuring the splitting pattern in a high-n Rydberg-Stark spectrum of para-H2 and finding that the rotation-induced splittings match the ion core spin-rotation value instead of being state-specific.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.17511 by Christian Jungen, Fr\'ed\'eric Merkt, Ioana Doran, Leon Jeckel, Maximilian Beyer.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Angular-momentum coupling diagrams showing the basis sets of matrices used in the calculations of the: MQDT [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: ℓ = 0 − 3, n = 34, v+ = 1 zero-field matrices for (a) ortho-D2, I = 2, N + = 0 and (b) para-H2, I = 0, N + = 2 obtained from MQDT calculations including spins. The different entries within each diagonal block correspond to the possible values of F resulting from the addition of ⃗j and F⃗ +, e.g., in the case of ℓ = 0, F = 1 for j = 1/2 and F + = 3/2, F = 2 for j = 1/2 and F + = 3/2 and F + = 5/2, and F = 3… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: shows the overall structure of these submatri￾ces for n = 40, v + = 1, ℓ = 5, in the case of (a) ortho-D2 with I = 2, N + = 0 and (b) para-H2 with I = 0, N + = 2. The elements of HˆCoulomb only contribute constant di￾agonal elements in the chosen basis set [see Eq. (4)] and are not represented in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Angular-momentum-coupling diagram in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: 4 ×4 matrices showing the electrostatic long-range (Hˆlr), hyperfine (Hˆhfs), spin-orbit (Hˆso) and other-spin−orbit (Hˆoso) interactions between |nv+⟩ |(ℓN +)N(I)K(S +)Fs(s)F⟩ states with n = 40, v+ = 1, ℓ = 5, F = 3, for a) ortho-D2 (I = 2, N + = 0) and b) para-H2 (I = 0, N + = 2). The center of the color scale (corresponding to zero coupling) is set to white. The basis states are labeled as |K, Fs⟩, cor… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Evolution of electrostatic long-range, hyperfine, spin-orbit and other-spin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Evolution of energy-level structure of ℓ = 5 Rydberg states of (a) ortho-D2, I = 2, v+ = 1, N + = 0 and (b) para-H2, I = 0, v+ = 1, N + = 2, as a function of n. The energy levels are referenced to −RD2(H2)/n2 and the black horizontal lines indicate the ionic hyperfine (spin-rotation) levels. The light grey lines show the predicted level energies neglecting all spins (i.e., corresponding to the spin-indepen… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: illustrates the first few entries (ℓ = 0 − 3) in the matrix representation of eFzˆ in the |(ℓs)j [(S +N +)J +(I)] F +FMF ⟩ basis for para-H2 (I = 0, N + = 2), n = 34, v+ = 1, MF = 0 and an electric field strength of 1 V/cm. As in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Calculated Rydberg-Stark manifolds for n = 34, v+ = 1 {(a) ortho-D2, I = 0, N + = 0, (b) ortho￾D2, I = 2, N + = 0, both accessed with the multiphoton exci￾tation sequence X 1Σ + g (v = 0, N = 0) → B 1Σ + u (v = 4, N = 1) → GK 1Σ + g (v = 2, N = 2) → n = 34 [D+ 2 X + 2Σ + g (v + = 1, N + = 0) ] and (c) para-H2, I = 0, N + = 2, accessed with the multiphoton excitation sequence X 1Σ + g (v = 0, N = 0) → B 1Σ … view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Deviations (∆E/h) of calculated manifold positions resulting from a change of δµg/µg = 1.5 · 10−2 in the zero￾field positions of g states at an electric field strength of F = 1 V/cm, for (a), (c): ortho-D2, v + = 1, N + = 0, I = 2 and (b),(d): para-H2, v + = 1, N + = 2, I = 0. The dots in the upper plots show the deviations of the different Stark states for n = 34 for spin-free calculations (orange curves)… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Sequence of frame transformations between the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Sequence of frame transformations between the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Sequence of frame transformations between the |(ℓs)j(S +N +)J +(I)F +F⟩ and the |(ℓN +)N(I)K(S +)Fs(s)F⟩ basis sets [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a general theoretical treatment and calculations of the fine and hyperfine structures in the spectra of high-$n$ molecular Rydberg states in static uniform electric fields. The treatment combines (i) multichannel quantum-defect theory and long-range polarization models to determine the field-free energies of $n\ell$ Rydberg states of the molecules ($\ell$ is the orbital-angular-momentum quantum number of the Rydberg electron), (ii) a matrix-diagonalization approach to calculate the Stark shifts including their hyperfine structure, and (iii) sequences of angular-momentum frame transformations to predict the line positions and intensities in Stark spectra as they would be observed in single or multiphoton excitation sequences. To clarify how the molecular rotation and the nuclear spins influence the fine and hyperfine structure of molecular Rydberg-Stark spectra, we compare calculated spectra of ortho-D$_2$ with a D$_2^+$ ion core in the rotational ground state ($N^+=0$) for total nuclear spins $I$ of 0 (i.e., without hyperfine structure) and 2 (i.e., with hyperfine structure) with the corresponding spectra of para-H$_2$ with an H$_2^+$ ion core in the first excited rotational state ($N^+=2$) but zero nuclear spin ($I=0$). The calculations show that the hyperfine interaction alone does not significantly modify the Stark effect, but splits each Stark state by almost exactly the hyperfine Fermi-contact splitting of the ion core. In contrast, the effect of the molecular rotation, which is coupled both to the ion-core electron spin by the magnetic spin-rotation interaction and to the Rydberg-electron orbital motion by the core-polarization and charge-quadrupole interactions, induces Stark-state specific splittings that significantly differ from the spin-rotation splitting of the ($N^+=2$) ion core.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a theoretical framework combining multichannel quantum-defect theory (MQDT) and long-range polarization models to obtain field-free energies of nℓ Rydberg states, followed by matrix diagonalization of the combined Stark + fine + hyperfine Hamiltonian and sequences of angular-momentum frame transformations to predict observable line positions and intensities. It applies this to high-n states of H₂ and D₂, specifically comparing ortho-D₂ (N⁺=0, I=0 and I=2) with para-H₂ (N⁺=2, I=0), and concludes that hyperfine structure produces essentially constant splittings equal to the core Fermi-contact interval while molecular rotation generates Stark-state-specific splittings that deviate from the ion-core spin-rotation interval.

Significance. If the numerical results hold, the work provides a clear separation of the distinct influences of hyperfine versus rotational couplings on molecular Rydberg-Stark manifolds, which is useful for interpreting high-resolution spectra and for applications in precision measurements or quantum control. The approach reuses established MQDT parameters and applies frame transformations uniformly, yielding falsifiable predictions of line positions and intensities for the two isotopologues; this constitutes a concrete advance over purely phenomenological treatments.

minor comments (3)
  1. The matrix-diagonalization section should state the dimension of the basis retained for each n manifold and the convergence threshold applied to the eigenvalues, as these directly affect the claimed constancy of the hyperfine shifts.
  2. A compact table listing the quantum numbers (N⁺, I, S, ℓ, etc.) and the specific MQDT parameters adopted for the ortho-D₂ and para-H₂ cases would improve readability and allow direct comparison with the two spectra shown.
  3. The description of the angular-momentum frame transformations would benefit from an explicit statement of how the dipole matrix elements are transformed for the single- versus multiphoton excitation pathways mentioned in the abstract.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of our manuscript and the recommendation for minor revision. We appreciate the recognition that our approach provides a clear separation of hyperfine and rotational influences on Rydberg-Stark manifolds and yields falsifiable predictions for the isotopologues. We have prepared a revised version with minor clarifications to the presentation of the frame transformations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The manuscript presents a theoretical framework combining multichannel quantum-defect theory (MQDT) and long-range polarization models to obtain field-free energies of nℓ Rydberg states, followed by matrix diagonalization of the combined Stark + fine + hyperfine Hamiltonian and sequences of angular-momentum frame transformations to predict observable line positions and intensities. It applies this to high-n states of H₂ and D₂, specifically comparing ortho-D₂ (N⁺=0, I=0 and I=2) with para-H₂ (N⁺=2, I=0), and concludes that hyperfine structure produces essentially constant splittings equal to the core Fermi-contact interval while molecular rotation generates Stark-state-specific splittings that deviate from the ion-core spin-rotation interval.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this accurate summary of our theoretical framework and conclusions. The description correctly captures the combination of MQDT with long-range models, the matrix-diagonalization treatment of the Stark Hamiltonian including fine and hyperfine terms, the use of frame transformations, and the specific comparison between the ortho-D₂ and para-H₂ cases. No revisions are required in response to this summary. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper's central claims follow directly from applying standard multichannel quantum-defect theory and long-range polarization models (drawn from prior literature) to obtain field-free energies, followed by explicit matrix diagonalization of the combined Stark + fine + hyperfine Hamiltonian and uniform angular-momentum frame transformations. The hyperfine contribution factors out as a near-constant shift equal to the core Fermi-contact interval, while rotational couplings produce state-dependent mixing; neither result is presupposed by the inputs or forced by self-citation. The calculations are performed for specific cases (ortho-D2 N+=0 and para-H2 N+=2) without fitting parameters to the target Stark spectra themselves, rendering the derivation self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The treatment relies on standard multichannel quantum-defect theory and long-range polarization models whose parameters are taken from earlier work; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Multichannel quantum-defect theory and long-range polarization models determine the field-free energies of n l Rydberg states
    Invoked in the first step of the treatment
  • domain assumption Angular-momentum frame transformations correctly predict observable line positions and intensities
    Used to connect calculated energies to experimental spectra

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5679 in / 1359 out tokens · 41845 ms · 2026-05-15T20:40:34.489405+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

131 extracted references · 131 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Angular-momentum-coupling diagram in the|(ℓN +)N(I)K(S +)Fs(s)F⟩basis set (left) and subset of four interacting states with the total angular momentumF(right)

    To an excellent approximation, these two groups of energy levels withF + = 1.5 and 2.5 are displaced from 9 Figure 3. Angular-momentum-coupling diagram in the|(ℓN +)N(I)K(S +)Fs(s)F⟩basis set (left) and subset of four interacting states with the total angular momentumF(right). Figure 4. 4×4 matrices showing the electrostatic long-range ( ˆHlr), hyperfine ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    The spectral intensities were determined in the short-range coupling regime (basis set|4⟩in Fig

    ] for para-H2. The spectral intensities were determined in the short-range coupling regime (basis set|4⟩in Fig. 1) in which optical selection rules (∆S= 0,∆ℓ=±1,∆F= 0,±1,∆Λ = 0,±1,∆M F = 0,±1) strongly restrict the available channels. Coherent and incoherent sums over the possible excitation pathways needed to be consid- ered to account for interference e...

    work page doi:10.13039/100019599

  3. [3]

    R. F. Stebbings and F. B. Dunning,Rydberg States of Atoms and Molecules(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983)

    work page 1983

  4. [4]

    T. F. Gallagher,Rydberg Atoms, edited by A. Dal- garno, P. L. Knight, F. H. Read, and R. N. Zare, Cam- bridge Monographs on Atomic, Molecular and Chem- ical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994)

    work page 1994

  5. [5]

    M¨ uller-Dethlefs and E

    K. M¨ uller-Dethlefs and E. W. Schlag, High-resolution zero kinetic energy (ZEKE) photoelectron spectroscopy of molecular systems, Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem.42, 109 (1991)

    work page 1991

  6. [6]

    Dietrich, K

    H.-J. Dietrich, K. M¨ uller-Dethlefs, and L. Ya. Baranov, Fractional Stark state selective electric field ionization of very high-nRydberg states of molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 3530 (1996)

    work page 1996

  7. [7]

    M¨ uller-Dethlefs and E

    K. M¨ uller-Dethlefs and E. W. Schlag, Chemical applica- tions of zero kinetic energy (ZEKE) photoelectron spec- troscopy, Angew. Chem. (int. ed. engl.)37, 1346 (1998)

    work page 1998

  8. [8]

    Hollenstein, R

    U. Hollenstein, R. Seiler, H. Schmutz, M. Andrist, and F. Merkt, Selective field ionization of high Rydberg states: Application to zero-kinetic-energy photoelectron spectroscopy, J. Chem. Phys.115, 5461 (2001)

    work page 2001

  9. [9]

    H¨ olsch, I

    N. H¨ olsch, I. Doran, M. Beyer, and F. Merkt, Preci- sion millimetre-wave spectroscopy and calculation of the Stark manifolds in high Rydberg states of para-H 2, J. Mol. Spectrosc.387, 111648 (2022)

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    Scheidegger, J

    S. Scheidegger, J. A. Agner, H. Schmutz, and F. Merkt, Metrology of Rydberg states of the hydrogen atom, Phys. Rev. A108, 042803 (2023)

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    Doran, N

    I. Doran, N. H¨ olsch, M. Beyer, and F. Merkt, Zero- quantum-defect method and the fundamental vibra- tional interval of H + 2 , Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 073001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Scheidegger and F

    S. Scheidegger and F. Merkt, Precision-spectroscopic determination of the binding energy of a two-body quan- tum system: The hydrogen atom and the proton-size puzzle, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 113001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    T. Vogt, M. Viteau, A. Chotia, J. Zhao, D. Comparat, and P. Pillet, Electric-field induced dipole blockade with Rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 073002 (2007)

    work page 2007

  14. [14]

    Comparat and P

    D. Comparat and P. Pillet, Dipole blockade in a cold Rydberg atomic sample, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B27, A208 (2010)

    work page 2010

  15. [15]

    Saffman, T

    M. Saffman, T. G. Walker, and K. Mølmer, Quantum information with Rydberg atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 2313 (2010)

    work page 2010

  16. [16]

    Nipper, J

    J. Nipper, J. B. Balewski, A. T. Krupp, B. Butscher, R. L¨ ow, and T. Pfau, Highly resolved measurements of Stark-tuned F¨ orster resonances between Rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 113001 (2012)

    work page 2012

  17. [17]

    Weber, C

    S. Weber, C. Tresp, H. Menke, A. Urvoy, O. Firstenberg, H. P. B¨ uchler, and S. Hofferberth, Calculation of Ryd- berg interaction potentials, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.50, 133001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  18. [18]

    Stecker, R

    M. Stecker, R. Nold, L.-M. Steinert, J. Grimmel, D. Pet- rosyan, J. Fort´ agh, and A. G¨ unther, Controlling the Dipole Blockade and Ionization Rate of Rydberg Atoms in Strong Electric Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 103602 (2020)

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Y. Jiao, J. Bai, R. Song, S. Bao, J. Zhao, and S. Jia, Electric field tuned dipolar interaction between Rydberg atoms, Frontiers in Physics10(2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    M´ ehaignerie, Y

    P. M´ ehaignerie, Y. Machu, A. Dur´ an Hern´ andez, G. Creutzer, D. Papoular, J.-M. Raimond, C. Sayrin, and M. Brune, Interacting Circular Rydberg Atoms Trapped in Optical Tweezers, PRX Quantum6

    work page

  21. [21]

    M. T. Frey, X. Ling, B. G. Lindsay, K. A. Smith, and F. B. Dunning, Use of the Stark effect to minimize resid- ual electric fields in an experimental volume, Rev. Sci. Instr.64, 3649 (1993)

    work page 1993

  22. [22]

    D. Klar, K. Ueda, J. Ganz, K. Harth, W. Bußert, S. Baier, J. M. Weber, M.-W. Ruf, and H. Hotop, High- resolution measurement and quantum-defect analysis for the Nend’J=1,2 and 3 autoionizing resonances, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.27, 4897 (1994)

    work page 1994

  23. [23]

    Osterwalder and F

    A. Osterwalder and F. Merkt, Using high Rydberg states as electric field sensors, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 1831 (1999)

    work page 1999

  24. [24]

    Thiele, S

    T. Thiele, S. Filipp, J. A. Agner, H. Schmutz, J. Dei- glmayr, M. Stammeier, P. Allmendinger, F. Merkt, and A. Wallraff, Manipulating Rydberg atoms close to surfaces at cryogenic temperatures, Phys. Rev. A90, 013414 (2014)

    work page 2014

  25. [25]

    Thiele, J

    T. Thiele, J. Deiglmayr, M. Stammeier, J.-A. Agner, H. Schmutz, F. Merkt, and A. Wallraff, Imaging electric fields in the vicinity of cryogenic surfaces using Rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. A92, 063425 (2015)

    work page 2015

  26. [26]

    J. A. Sedlacek, E. Kim, S. T. Rittenhouse, P. F. Weck, H. R. Sadeghpour, and J. P. Shaffer, Electric field can- cellation on quartz by Rb adsorbate-induced negative electron affinity, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 133201 (2016)

    work page 2016

  27. [27]

    Facon, E.-K

    A. Facon, E.-K. Dietsche, D. Grosso, S. Haroche, J.-M. Raimond, M. Brune, and S. Gleyzes, A sensitive elec- trometer based on a Rydberg atom in a Schr¨ odinger–cat state, Nature535, 262 (2016)

    work page 2016

  28. [28]

    Zhang, Y

    H. Zhang, Y. Ma, K. Liao, W. Yang, Z. Liu, D. Ding, H. Yan, W. Li, and L. Zhang, Rydberg atom electric field sensing for metrology, communication and hybrid quantum systems, Science Bulletin69, 1515 (2024)

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    M. L. Zimmerman, M. G. Littman, M. M. Kash, and D. Kleppner, Stark structure of the Rydberg states of alkali-metal atoms, Phys. Rev. A20, 2251 (1979)

    work page 1979

  30. [30]

    H. A. Bethe and E. E. Salpeter,Quantum Mechanics of One- and Two-Electron Atoms(Springer, Berlin, 1957)

    work page 1957

  31. [31]

    W. E. Ernst, T. P. Softley, and R. N. Zare, Stark-effect studies in xenon autoionizing Rydberg states using a tunable extreme-ultraviolet laser source, Phys. Rev. A 37, 4172 (1988)

    work page 1988

  32. [32]

    P. F. Brevet, M. Pellarin, and J. L. Vialle, Stark effect in argon Rydberg states, Phys. Rev. A42, 1460 (1990)

    work page 1990

  33. [33]

    H. H. Fielding and T. P. Softley, Observation of the Stark effect in autoionizing Rydberg states of Ar with a multichannel quantum-defect analysis, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.25, 4125 (1992)

    work page 1992

  34. [34]

    M. J. J. Vrakking, Role of core interactions and exter- nal perturbations in the autoionization of Xe, J. Phys. Chem. A101, 6761 (1997)

    work page 1997

  35. [35]

    Merkt, A

    F. Merkt, A. Osterwalder, R. Seiler, R. Signorell, H. Palm, H. Schmutz, and R. Gunzinger, High Ryd- berg states of argon: Stark effekt and field-ionization 21 properties, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.31, 1705 (1998)

    work page 1998

  36. [36]

    V. A. Shubert and S. T. Pratt, Photoelectron imaging of autoionizing states of xenon: Effect of external electric fields, Phys. Rev. A84, 053413 (2011)

    work page 2011

  37. [37]

    J. R. P. Angel and P. G. H. Sandars, The hyperfine structure Stark effect. I. Theory, Proc. R. Soc. London A305, 125 (1968)

    work page 1968

  38. [38]

    J. M. Amini and H. Gould, High Precision Measurement of the Static Dipole Polarizability of Cesium, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 153001 (2003)

    work page 2003

  39. [39]

    S. C. Bennett, J. L. Roberts, and C. E. Wieman, Mea- surement of the dc stark shift of the 6S→7Stransition in atomic cesium, Phys. Rev. A59, R16 (1999)

    work page 1999

  40. [40]

    Simon, P

    E. Simon, P. Laurent, and A. Clairon, Measurement of the Stark shift of the Cs hyperfine splitting in an atomic fountain, Phys. Rev. A57, 436 (1998)

    work page 1998

  41. [41]

    van Leeuwen and W

    K. van Leeuwen and W. Hogervorst, Stark effect, hyper- fine structure and isotope shifts in highly excited states of BaI and CaI, Z. Physik A316, 149 (1984)

    work page 1984

  42. [42]

    P. P. Herrmann, J. Hoffnagle, N. Schlumpf, V. L. Telegdi, and A. Weis, Stark spectroscopy of forbidden two-photon transitions: a sensitive probe for the quan- titative measurement of small electric fields, Journal of Physics B: Atomic and Molecular Physics19, 1271 (1986)

    work page 1986

  43. [43]

    Sakimoto, Multichannel quantum-defect theory of the Stark effect, J

    K. Sakimoto, Multichannel quantum-defect theory of the Stark effect, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys.19, 3011 (1986)

    work page 1986

  44. [44]

    Sakimoto, Influence of electric fields on highly excited states of H2: Quantum-defect-theory approach, J

    K. Sakimoto, Influence of electric fields on highly excited states of H2: Quantum-defect-theory approach, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.22, 2727 (1989)

    work page 1989

  45. [45]

    D. A. Harmin, Hydrogenic Stark effect: Properties of the wave functions, Phys. Rev. A24, 2491 (1981)

    work page 1981

  46. [46]

    D. A. Harmin, Analytical study of quasidiscrete Stark levels in Rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. A30, 2413 (1984)

    work page 1984

  47. [47]

    D. J. Armstrong and C. H. Greene, Evolution of barium autoionizing stark spectra with energy and field, Phys. Rev. A50, 4956 (1994)

    work page 1994

  48. [48]

    Giannakeas, C

    P. Giannakeas, C. H. Greene, and F. Robicheaux, Gen- eralized local-frame-transformation theory for excited species in external fields, Phys. Rev. A94, 013419 (2016)

    work page 2016

  49. [49]

    T. P. Softley, A. J. Hudson, and R. Watson, Multichan- nel quantum defect theory Stark effect calculation of autoionization lifetimes in high-nRydberg states of Ar, N2 and H2, J. Chem. Phys.106, 1041 (1997)

    work page 1997

  50. [50]

    Gr¨ utter, O

    M. Gr¨ utter, O. Zehnder, T. P. Softley, and F. Merkt, Spectroscopic study and multichannel quantum defect theory analysis of the Stark effect in Rydberg states of neon, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.41, 115001 (2008)

    work page 2008

  51. [51]

    H. H. Fielding and T. P. Softley, Observation of the Stark effect in autoionising Rydberg states of molecular hydrogen, Chem. Phys. Lett.185, 199 (1991)

    work page 1991

  52. [52]

    H. H. Fielding and T. P. Softley, Multichannel- quantum-defect-theory analysis of the Stark effect in autoionizing Rydberg states of H 2, Phys. Rev. A49, 969 (1994)

    work page 1994

  53. [53]

    A. L. Goodgame, H. Dickinson, S. R. Mackenzie, and T. P. Softley, The Stark effect in thev +=1 autoionizing Rydberg states of NO, J. Chem. Phys.116, 4922 (2002)

    work page 2002

  54. [54]

    M. G. Littman, M. L. Zimmerman, T. W. Ducas, R. R. Freeman, and D. Kleppner, Structure of sodium Ryd- berg states in weak to strong electric fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.36, 788 (1976)

    work page 1976

  55. [55]

    Tauschinsky, R

    A. Tauschinsky, R. Newell, H. B. van Linden van den Heuvell, and R. J. C. Spreeuw, Measurement of 87Rb Rydberg-state hyperfine splitting in a room- temperature vapor cell, Phys. Rev. A87, 042522 (2013)

    work page 2013

  56. [56]

    Grimmel, M

    J. Grimmel, M. Mack, F. Karlewski, F. Jessen, M. Rein- schmidt, N. S´ andor, and J. Fort´ agh, Measurement and numerical calculation of rubidium Rydberg Stark spec- tra, New J. Phys.17, 053005 (2015)

    work page 2015

  57. [57]

    ˇSibali´ c, J

    N. ˇSibali´ c, J. D. Pritchard, C. S. Adams, and K. J. Weatherill, ARC: An open-source library for calculat- ing properties of alkali Rydberg atoms, Comput. Phys. Commun.220, 319 (2017)

    work page 2017

  58. [58]

    Peper, J

    M. Peper, J. Deiglmayr, F. Merkt, C. Sanna, and H. B. van Linden van den Heuvell, Magic Rydberg-Rydberg transitions in electric fields, Phys. Rev. A100, 032512 (2019)

    work page 2019

  59. [59]

    Duspayev, R

    A. Duspayev, R. Cardman, D. A. Anderson, and G. Raithel, High-angular-momentum Rydberg states in a room-temperature vapor cell for dc electric-field sens- ing, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 023138 (2024)

    work page 2024

  60. [60]

    Jungen and E

    Ch. Jungen and E. Miescher, Absorption spectrum of the NO molecule. IX. The structure of thefcomplexes, the ionization potential of NO, and the quadrupole mo- ment of NO+, Can. J. Phys.47, 1769 (1969)

    work page 1969

  61. [61]

    Herzberg and Ch

    G. Herzberg and Ch. Jungen, Rydberg series and ion- ization potential of the H 2 molecule, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 41, 425 (1972)

    work page 1972

  62. [62]

    R. S. Freund, High-Rydberg molecules, inRydberg States of Atoms and Molecules, edited by R. F. Steb- bings and F. B. Dunning (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983) Chap. 10, pp. 355–392

    work page 1983

  63. [63]

    D. S. Ginter and M. L. Ginter, The spectrum and structure of the He 2 molecule. Multichannel quantum defect analyses of the triplet levels associated with (1σg)2(1σu)npλ, J. Mol. Spectrosc.82, 152 (1980)

    work page 1980

  64. [64]

    D. S. Ginter, M. L. Ginter, and C. M. Brown, Multi- channel interactions in the (1σ g)2(1σu)npλ(3Πg, 3Σ+ g ) Rydberg structures of He 2, J. Chem. Phys.81, 6013 (1984)

    work page 1984

  65. [65]

    D. S. Ginter and M. L. Ginter, Multichannel interac- tions in the (1σ g)2(1σu)nsσ, ndλ(3Σ+ u , 3Σ+ u , 3Πu, 3∆u) Rydberg structures of He 2, J. Chem. Phys.88, 3761 (1988)

    work page 1988

  66. [66]

    K. P. Huber and Ch. Jungen, High-resolution jet ab- sorption study of nitrogen near 800 ˚A, J. Chem. Phys. 92, 850 (1990)

    work page 1990

  67. [67]

    Jungen,Molecular Applications of Quantum De- fect Theory(Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol and Philadelphia, 1996)

    Ch. Jungen,Molecular Applications of Quantum De- fect Theory(Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol and Philadelphia, 1996)

    work page 1996

  68. [68]

    Jungen, Elements of quantum defect theory, in Handbook of High-Resolution Spectroscopy, Vol

    Ch. Jungen, Elements of quantum defect theory, in Handbook of High-Resolution Spectroscopy, Vol. 1, edited by M. Quack and F. Merkt (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 2011) pp. 471–510

    work page 2011

  69. [69]

    Vervloet, A

    M. Vervloet, A. L. Roche, and C. Jungen, Observation of high-lRydberg states of nitric oxide, Phys. Rev. A 38, 5489 (1988)

    work page 1988

  70. [70]

    Seiler, U

    R. Seiler, U. Hollenstein, T. P. Softley, and F. Merkt, High-resolution threshold-ionization spectroscopy of NH3, J. Chem. Phys.118, 10024 (2003)

    work page 2003

  71. [71]

    Deller and S

    A. Deller and S. D. Hogan, Excitation and characteri- zation of long-lived hydrogenic Rydberg states of nitric oxide, The Journal of Chemical Physics152, 144305 (2020). 22

    work page 2020

  72. [72]

    S. R. Langford, A. J. Orr-Ewing, R. A. Morgan, C. M. Western, M. N. R. Ashfold, A. Rijkenberg, C. R. Scheper, W. J. Buma, and C. A. de Lange, The spec- troscopy of high Rydberg states of ammonia, J. Chem. Phys.108, 6667 (1998)

    work page 1998

  73. [73]

    Raptis and S

    C. Raptis and S. Pratt, Rotational interactions in autoionizing Rydberg states of ammonia, Chemical Physics Letters303, 281 (1999)

    work page 1999

  74. [74]

    R. W. Field, C. M. Gittins, N. A. Harris, and Ch. Jun- gen, Quantum defect theory of dipole and vibronic mix- ing in Rydberg states of CaF, J. Chem. Phys.122, 184314 (2005)

    work page 2005

  75. [75]

    J. J. Kay, S. L. Coy, B. M. Wong, Ch. Jungen, and R. W. Field, A quantum defect model for thes,p,d, and fRydberg series of CaF, J. Chem. Phys.134, 114313 (2011)

    work page 2011

  76. [76]

    C. A. Raptis and S. T. Pratt, Two-photon spectroscopy of autoionizing states of ammonia, The Journal of Chemical Physics115, 2483 (2001)

    work page 2001

  77. [77]

    J. A. Bacon and S. T. Pratt, Photoelectron spectroscopy of ammonia: Mode-dependent vibrational autoioniza- tion, The Journal of Chemical Physics113, 7188 (2000)

    work page 2000

  78. [78]

    Seiler, S

    Ch. Seiler, S. D. Hogan, and F. Merkt, Trapping cold molecular hydrogen, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.13, 19000 (2011)

    work page 2011

  79. [79]

    M. J. J. Vrakking, Lifetimes of Rydberg states in ZEKE experiments. III. Calculations of the dc electric field de- pendence of predissociation lifetimes of NO, J. Chem. Phys.105, 7336 (1996)

    work page 1996

  80. [80]

    J. B. M. Warntjes, F. Robicheaux, J. M. Bakker, and L. D. Noordam, Autoionizing Rydberg states of NO in strong electric fields, J. Chem. Phys.111, 2556 (1999)

    work page 1999

Showing first 80 references.