pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.18110 · v2 · pith:AWPYWQLZnew · submitted 2026-02-20 · ⚛️ physics.optics

Cavity Solitons as a Nonlinear Substrate for Photonic Neuromorphic Computing

Amir Arsalan Arabieh , Alessandro Lupo , Simon-Pierre Gorza , Serge Massar This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 12:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics
keywords cavity solitonsreservoir computingphotonic computingfiber opticsKelly wavesneuromorphic computingnonlinear dynamicsmachine learning
0
0 comments X

The pith

Cavity solitons sustained in a fiber optical cavity can serve as the nonlinear substrate for photonic reservoir computing.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that cavity solitons in a driven fiber cavity form the basis of a photonic reservoir computer for handling temporal data. Inputs are introduced by phase modulation of the driving laser, and the reservoir response is extracted via frequency-resolved measurements. Numerical simulations show that the spontaneous emission of Kelly waves adds dynamical richness that improves accuracy on standard machine learning benchmarks. A sympathetic reader would care because reservoir computing needs only linear readout training, so an optical physical system could perform fast, low-power time-series processing without digital simulation of the reservoir.

Core claim

Cavity solitons sustained in a fiber optical cavity provide an optical platform for photonic reservoir computing. Input is encoded by a phase-modulated drive laser, and reservoir states are accessed through frequency-resolved readout. Numerical simulations indicate that the emission of Kelly waves enriches the dynamics and enhances performance for machine learning tasks, as evaluated on several standard benchmark tasks.

What carries the argument

Cavity solitons, stable localized optical pulses that circulate in the driven fiber cavity, supply the nonlinear dynamical states used as the reservoir.

If this is right

  • The physical nonlinearities of the optical cavity perform the temporal processing without requiring explicit digital simulation of the reservoir.
  • Only the linear readout layer needs training, keeping computational cost low.
  • Kelly waves generated in the cavity increase the complexity of the reservoir states and raise task accuracy.
  • The approach can be tested on standard reservoir-computing benchmarks to quantify its utility.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Embedding the cavity in existing fiber networks could enable distributed, low-energy temporal signal processing at the physical layer.
  • Frequency-resolved readout opens the possibility of extracting multiple independent reservoir channels from a single cavity.
  • Real-device experiments would need to check whether cavity losses and noise degrade the simulated performance gains from Kelly waves.

Load-bearing premise

The numerical model of the cavity dynamics, including soliton stability and Kelly-wave generation, is accurate enough to represent real experimental conditions and predict actual reservoir-computing performance.

What would settle it

A laboratory realization of the phase-modulated cavity soliton system that measures performance on the same benchmark tasks and shows clear agreement or disagreement with the numerical predictions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.18110 by Alessandro Lupo, Amir Arsalan Arabieh, Serge Massar, Simon-Pierre Gorza.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Reservoir computing with cavity solitons. (a) Reservoir computing framework showing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Analysis of cavity solitons under phase modulation of the driving field. (a) Sta [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparative analysis of different theoretical frameworks for reservoir computing. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Reservoir computing performance in the parameter space defined by the input-phase [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Experimental setup. A continuous-wave laser (CW) is split using a 50:50 cou [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Experimental results on XOR task. (a) The upper panel shows the response of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: One-step-ahead prediction of the Hénon map using the cavity-soliton reservoir com [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Reservoir computing leverages nonlinear dynamics of physical systems to process temporal information with minimal training cost. Here, we demonstrate that cavity solitons sustained in a fiber optical cavity provide an optical platform for photonic reservoir computing. Our methodology exploits the use of a phase-modulated drive laser to encode the input, while the reservoir states are accessed through frequency-resolved readout. Numerical simulations indicate that the emission of Kelly waves enriches the dynamics and enhances performance for machine learning tasks. We evaluate the performance of the cavity-soliton reservoir computer on several standard benchmark tasks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes cavity solitons sustained in a driven fiber optical cavity as a physical substrate for photonic reservoir computing. Input data are encoded via phase modulation of the driving laser, reservoir states are extracted through frequency-resolved readout, and numerical simulations of the cavity dynamics (based on a Lugiato-Lefever-type equation) indicate that Kelly-wave emission enriches the nonlinear response and improves performance on standard machine-learning benchmark tasks.

Significance. If the reported numerical performance gains prove robust and transferable to experiment, the work would supply a concrete all-optical platform for reservoir computing that exploits intrinsic cavity dynamics rather than engineered networks. The suggestion that Kelly waves specifically enhance state richness is a potentially useful physical insight, though its generality remains to be demonstrated.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (Numerical Model): The Lugiato-Lefever equation parameters (dispersion, nonlinearity coefficient, detuning, and loss) are stated as fixed values, yet no sensitivity sweeps or robustness checks are presented. Because Kelly-wave generation and its contribution to reservoir dimensionality depend on these choices, the absence of such analysis leaves open the possibility that the reported benchmark gains are artifacts of the particular parameter set rather than a generic feature of the soliton platform.
  2. [§4] §4 (Benchmark Results): Performance metrics on the standard tasks are given as single-point values without error bars, statistics over multiple random initializations, or ablation comparisons that isolate the incremental benefit attributable to Kelly waves versus the soliton background alone. This makes it difficult to judge whether the claimed enhancement is statistically significant or reproducible.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions should explicitly state the readout bandwidth and the number of frequency channels used for state extraction.
  2. [Discussion] A brief comparison table placing the cavity-soliton reservoir against other photonic RC implementations (e.g., microring or SOA-based) would help readers gauge relative advantages.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and positive overall assessment of the work. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to improve the robustness and statistical presentation of the results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (Numerical Model): The Lugiato-Lefever equation parameters (dispersion, nonlinearity coefficient, detuning, and loss) are stated as fixed values, yet no sensitivity sweeps or robustness checks are presented. Because Kelly-wave generation and its contribution to reservoir dimensionality depend on these choices, the absence of such analysis leaves open the possibility that the reported benchmark gains are artifacts of the particular parameter set rather than a generic feature of the soliton platform.

    Authors: We agree that additional sensitivity analysis would strengthen the claim that the observed benefits are generic to the cavity-soliton platform. The parameters were chosen to match standard experimental conditions for stable cavity solitons in fiber resonators. In the revised manuscript we add a new figure and accompanying text showing results for a range of detuning values (within the soliton existence region) and two different dispersion coefficients. The performance gain associated with Kelly-wave emission remains qualitatively consistent across these variations, indicating that the enhancement is not an artifact of the specific parameter set. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (Benchmark Results): Performance metrics on the standard tasks are given as single-point values without error bars, statistics over multiple random initializations, or ablation comparisons that isolate the incremental benefit attributable to Kelly waves versus the soliton background alone. This makes it difficult to judge whether the claimed enhancement is statistically significant or reproducible.

    Authors: We acknowledge that single-point metrics limit the ability to assess reproducibility. In the revised version we now report mean performance and standard deviation over ten independent realizations that differ in the random initial conditions of the cavity field. We have also added an ablation comparison in which Kelly-wave emission is suppressed by a small shift in detuning while keeping the soliton background intact; the resulting drop in benchmark accuracy quantifies the incremental contribution of the Kelly waves. These additions allow a clearer evaluation of statistical significance. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: simulations evaluate external benchmarks using established cavity model

full rationale

The paper describes numerical integration of the Lugiato-Lefever equation for a driven fiber cavity to generate reservoir states from cavity solitons and Kelly waves. Input encoding and frequency-resolved readout are defined independently of the target ML tasks. Performance is measured on standard external benchmarks rather than any self-referential or fitted metric. No equation reduces to a prior fit by construction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the same authors, and no ansatz is smuggled via self-citation. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard nonlinear-optics models of driven fiber cavities; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The dynamics of the driven fiber cavity are governed by a standard model such as the Lugiato-Lefever equation.
    Invoked implicitly to sustain cavity solitons and generate Kelly waves.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5620 in / 1059 out tokens · 40335 ms · 2026-05-21T12:47:16.398407+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    D., Kulkarni, S

    Schuman, C. D., Kulkarni, S. R., Parsa, M., Mitchell, J. P., Date, P., & Kay, B. (2022). Opportunities for neuromorphic computing algorithms and applications.Nature Computational Science, 2(1), 10–19

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    J., Tait, A

    Shastri, B. J., Tait, A. N., Ferreira de Lima, T., Pernice, W. H., Bhaskaran, H., Wright, C. D., & Prucnal, P. R. (2021). Photonics for artificial intelligence and neuromorphic computing.Nature Photonics, 15(2), 102–114

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Jaeger, H., & Haas, H. (2004). Harnessing nonlinearity: Predicting chaotic systems and saving energy in wireless communication.Science, 304(5667), 78–80. 17

    work page 2004

  4. [4]

    Maass, W., Natschläger, T., & Markram, H. (2002). Real-time computing without stable states: A new framework for neural computation based on perturbations.Neural computation, 14(11), 2531–2560

    work page 2002

  5. [5]

    Verstraeten, D., Schrauwen, B., d’Haene, M., & Stroobandt, D. (2007). An experimental unification of reser- voir computing methods.Neural networks, 20(3), 391–403

    work page 2007

  6. [6]

    Jaeger, H. (2001). Short term memory in echo state networks.GMD Report,152, 1–60

    work page 2001

  7. [7]

    B., Nakane, R., Kanazawa, N., Takeda, S.,

    Tanaka, G., Yamane, T., Héroux, J. B., Nakane, R., Kanazawa, N., Takeda, S., ... & Hirose, A. (2019). Recent advances in physical reservoir computing: A review.Neural Networks, 115, 100–123

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Yan, M., Huang, C., Bienstman, P., Tino, P., Lin, W., & Sun, J. (2024). Emerging opportunities and challenges for the future of reservoir computing.Nature Communications, 15(1), 2056

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    Van der Sande, G., Brunner, D., & Soriano, M. C. (2017). Advances in photonic reservoir computing. Nanophotonics, 6(3), 561–576

    work page 2017

  10. [10]

    C., Van der Sande, G., Danckaert, J., Massar, S., Dambre, J.,

    Appeltant, L., Soriano, M. C., Van der Sande, G., Danckaert, J., Massar, S., Dambre, J., ... & Fischer, I. (2011). Information processing using a single dynamical node as complex system.Nature communications, 2(1), 468

    work page 2011

  11. [11]

    Butschek, L., Akrout, A., Dimitriadou, E., Lupo, A., Haelterman, M., & Massar, S. (2022). Photonic reservoir computer based on frequency multiplexing.Optics Letters, 47(4), 782–785

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    & Turitsyn, S

    Abreu, S., Boikov, I., Goldmann, M., Jonuzi, T., Lupo, A., Masaad, S., ... & Turitsyn, S. K. (2024). A photonics perspective on computing with physical substrates.Reviews in Physics, 12, 100093

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    Akhmediev, N., & Ankiewicz, A. (Eds.). (2005).Dissipative Solitons. Lecture Notes in Physics. Springer- Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg

    work page 2005

  14. [14]

    (2008).Dissipative Solitons: From Optics to Biology and Medicine

    Akhmediev, N., & Ankiewicz, A. (2008).Dissipative Solitons: From Optics to Biology and Medicine. Springer Science & Business Media

    work page 2008

  15. [15]

    Hasegawa, A. (1989). Optical solitons in fibers. InOptical Solitons in Fibers(pp. 1–74). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

    work page 1989

  16. [16]

    G., Yang, Q

    Suh, M. G., Yang, Q. F., Yang, K. Y., Yi, X., & Vahala, K. J. (2016). Microresonator soliton dual-comb spectroscopy.Science, 354(6312), 600–603

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    G., Picqué, N., Lipson, M., & Gaeta, A

    Yu, M., Okawachi, Y., Griffith, A. G., Picqué, N., Lipson, M., & Gaeta, A. L. (2018). Silicon-chip-based mid-infrared dual-comb spectroscopy.Nature communications, 9(1), 1869

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    G., Wang, H., Lin, Q., & Vahala, K

    Bao, C., Yuan, Z., Wu, L., Suh, M. G., Wang, H., Lin, Q., & Vahala, K. J. (2021). Architecture for microcomb-based GHz-mid-infrared dual-comb spectroscopy.Nature communications, 12(1), 6573

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    N., Karpov, M., Kordts, A., Pfeifle, J., Pfeiffer, M

    Marin-Palomo, P., Kemal, J. N., Karpov, M., Kordts, A., Pfeifle, J., Pfeiffer, M. H., ... & Koos, C. (2017). Microresonator-based solitons for massively parallel coherent optical communications.Nature, 546(7657), 274– 279

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    & Qiu, K

    Geng, Y., Zhou, H., Han, X., Cui, W., Zhang, Q., Liu, B., ... & Qiu, K. (2022). Coherent optical communi- cations using coherence-cloned Kerr soliton microcombs.Nature communications, 13(1), 1070

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    P., Emplit, P., & Haelterman, M

    Leo, F., Coen, S., Kockaert, P., Gorza, S. P., Emplit, P., & Haelterman, M. (2010). Temporal cavity solitons in one-dimensional Kerr media as bits in an all-optical buffer.Nature Photonics, 4(7), 471–476

    work page 2010

  22. [22]

    P., & Leo, F

    Englebert, N., Mas Arabí, C., Parra-Rivas, P., Gorza, S. P., & Leo, F. (2021). Temporal solitons in a coherently driven active resonator.Nature Photonics, 15(7), 536–541

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    D., Wang, C

    Herr, T., Brasch, V., Jost, J. D., Wang, C. Y., Kondratiev, N. M., Gorodetsky, M. L., & Kippenberg, T. J. (2014). Temporal solitons in optical microresonators.Nature Photonics, 8(2), 145–152

    work page 2014

  24. [24]

    J., Gaeta, A

    Kippenberg, T. J., Gaeta, A. L., Lipson, M., & Gorodetsky, M. L. (2018). Dissipative Kerr solitons in optical microresonators.Science, 361(6402), eaan8083

    work page 2018

  25. [25]

    S., & Firth, W

    McDonald, G. S., & Firth, W. J. (1990). Spatial solitary-wave optical memory.Journal of the Optical Society of America B, 7(7), 1328–1335

    work page 1990

  26. [26]

    Pimenov, A., Amiranashvili, S., & Vladimirov, A. G. (2020). Temporal cavity solitons in a delayed model of a dispersive cavity ring laser.Mathematical Modelling of Natural Phenomena, 15, 47

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    & Bhaskaran, H

    Feldmann, J., Youngblood, N., Karpov, M., Gehring, H., Li, X., Stappers, M., ... & Bhaskaran, H. (2021). Parallel convolutional processing using an integrated photonic tensor core.Nature, 589(7840), 52–58

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    Xu, X., Tan, M., Corcoran, B., Wu, J., Boes, A., Nguyen, T. G., ... & Moss, D. J. (2021). 11 TOPS photonic convolutional accelerator for optical neural networks.Nature, 589(7840), 44–51

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    G., Boes, A.,

    Xu, X., Tan, M., Corcoran, B., Wu, J., Nguyen, T. G., Boes, A., ... & Moss, D. J. (2020). Photonic perceptron based on a Kerr Microcomb for high-speed, scalable, optical neural networks.Laser & Photonics Reviews, 14(10), 2000070. 18

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    Jin, Y., Chauhan, N., Zang, J., Edwards, B., Chaudhari, P., Aflatouni, F., & Papp, S. B. (2025). A Kerr soliton Ising machine for combinatorial optimization problems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.00810

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Marcucci, G., Pierangeli, D., & Conti, C. (2020). Theory of neuromorphic computing by waves: machine learning by rogue waves, dispersive shocks, and solitons. Physical Review Letters, 125(9), 093901

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    Zhou, T., Scalzo, F., & Jalali, B. (2022). Nonlinear Schrödinger kernel for hardware acceleration of machine learning.Journal of Lightwave Technology, 40(5), 1308–1319

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    A., Ferreira, T

    Silva, N. A., Ferreira, T. D., & Guerreiro, A. (2021). Reservoir computing with solitons.New Journal of Physics, 23(2), 023013

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    Lupo, A., Butschek, L., & Massar, S. (2021). Photonic extreme learning machine based on frequency mul- tiplexing.Optics express, 29(18), 28257–28276

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    M., & Genty, G

    Hary, M., Brunner, D., Leybov, L., Ryczkowski, P., Dudley, J. M., & Genty, G. (2025). Principles and metrics of extreme learning machines using a highly nonlinear fiber.Nanophotonics, (0)

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    R., Bocklitz, T., Fischer, B., & Chemnitz, M

    Saeed, S., Müftüoğlu, M., Cheeran, G. R., Bocklitz, T., Fischer, B., & Chemnitz, M. (2025). Nonlinear inference capacity of fiber-optical extreme learning machines.Nanophotonics, (0)

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    Zajnulina, M., Lupo, A., & Massar, S. (2025). Weak Kerr nonlinearity boosts the performance of frequency- multiplexed photonic extreme learning machines: a multifaceted approach.Optics Express, 33(4), 7601–7619

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    Q., Shen, Y

    Li, R. Q., Shen, Y. W., Lin, B. D., Yu, J., He, X., & Wang, C. (2023). Scalable wavelength-multiplexing photonic reservoir computing.APL Machine Learning, 1(3)

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    Skontranis, M., Sarantoglou, G., Sozos, K., Kamalakis, T., Mesaritakis, C., & Bogris, A. (2023). Multimode fabry-perot laser as a reservoir computing and extreme learning machine photonic accelerator.Neuromorphic Computing and Engineering, 3(4), 044003

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    Cox, N., Murray, J., Hart, J., & Redding, B. (2025). Photonic frequency multiplexed next-generation reser- voir computer.APL Photonics, 10(3)

    work page 2025

  41. [41]

    S., Manuylovich, E., Kamalian-Kopae, M., & Perego, A

    Shishavan, N. S., Manuylovich, E., Kamalian-Kopae, M., & Perego, A. M. (2025). Optical neuromorphic computing based on chaotic frequency combs in nonlinear microresonators.Physical Review Research, 7(4), L042008

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    Cuevas, J., Hu, Y., Shi, B., Liu, J., Minoshima, K., & Kuse, N. (2025). Frequency-multiplexed optical reservoir computing using a microcomb.Nanophotonics, 14(18), 3063–3073

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    Kelly, S. M. (1992, June). Characteristic Sideband Instability of the Periodically Amplified (Average) Soliton. In International Quantum Electronics Conference(p. TuH3). Optica Publishing Group

    work page 1992

  44. [44]

    J., Blow, K

    Smith, N. J., Blow, K. J., & Andonovic, I. (2002). Sideband generation through perturbations to the average soliton model.Journal of lightwave technology, 10(10), 1329-1333

    work page 2002

  45. [45]

    G., & Coen, S

    Wang, Y., Leo, F., Fatome, J., Erkintalo, M., Murdoch, S. G., & Coen, S. (2017). Universal mechanism for the binding of temporal cavity solitons.Optica, 4(8), 855–863

    work page 2017

  46. [46]

    Ikeda, K. (1979). Multiple-valued stationary state and its instability of the transmitted light by a ring cavity system.Optics Communications, 30(2), 257–261

    work page 1979

  47. [47]

    Haelterman, M., Trillo, S., & Wabnitz, S. (1992). Dissipative modulation instability in a nonlinear dispersive ring cavity.Optics communications, 91(5-6), 401–407

    work page 1992

  48. [48]

    A., & Lefever, R

    Lugiato, L. A., & Lefever, R. (1987). Spatial dissipative structures in passive optical systems.Physical Review Letters, 58(21), 2209–2212

    work page 1987

  49. [49]

    K., & Menyuk, C

    Chembo, Y. K., & Menyuk, C. R. (2013). Spatiotemporal Lugiato-Lefever formalism for Kerr-comb gen- eration in whispering-gallery-mode resonators.Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 87(5), 053852

    work page 2013

  50. [50]

    G., Sylvestre, T., & Erkintalo, M

    Coen, S., Randle, H. G., Sylvestre, T., & Erkintalo, M. (2012). Modeling of octave-spanning Kerr frequency combs using a generalized mean-field Lugiato–Lefever model.Optics Letters, 38(1), 37–39

    work page 2012

  51. [51]

    Anderson, D. (1983). Variational approach to nonlinear pulse propagation in optical fibers.Physical Review A, 27(6), 3135–3145

    work page 1983

  52. [52]

    Hasegawa, A. (2002). Soliton-based optical communications: an overview.IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 6(6), 1161–1172

    work page 2002

  53. [53]

    L., &Kippenberg, T

    Herr, T., Gorodetsky, M. L., &Kippenberg, T. J. (2016). Dissipative Kerr solitons inoptical microresonators. Nonlinear optical cavity dynamics: from microresonators to fiber lasers, 129-162

    work page 2016

  54. [54]

    M., Gorza, S

    Englebert, N., Arabí, C. M., Gorza, S. P., & Leo, F. (2023). High peak-to-background-ratio solitons in a coherently driven active fiber cavity.APL Photonics, 8(12)

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    Lugiato, L. A. (2003). Introduction to the feature section on cavity solitons: An overview.IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, 39(2), 193–196. 19

    work page 2003

  56. [56]

    Coen, S., & Erkintalo, M. (2013). Universal scaling laws of Kerr frequency combs.Optics letters, 38(11), 1790–1792

    work page 2013

  57. [57]

    Agrawal, G. P. (2000). Nonlinear fiber optics. In P. L. Christiansen, M. P. Sorensen, & A. C. Scott (Eds.), Nonlinear science at the dawn of the 21st century(pp. 195–211). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer

    work page 2000

  58. [58]

    Hansson, T., & Wabnitz, S. (2015). Frequency comb generation beyond the Lugiato–Lefever equation: multi- stability and super cavity solitons.Journal of the Optical Society of America B, 32(7), 1259–1266

    work page 2015

  59. [59]

    Vinckier, Q., Duport, F., Smerieri, A., Vandoorne, K., Bienstman, P., Haelterman, M., & Massar, S. (2015). High-performance photonic reservoir computer based on a coherently driven passive cavity.Optica, 2(5), 438– 446

    work page 2015

  60. [60]

    Mackey, M.C., &Glass, L.(1977).Oscillationandchaosinphysiologicalcontrolsystems.Science, 197(4300), 287–289

    work page 1977

  61. [61]

    S., Ehlers, P

    Kaushik, I. S., Ehlers, P. J., & Soh, D. (2025). All Optical Echo State Network Reservoir Computing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.08224

    work page arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    H., Zervas, M.,

    Karpov, M., Guo, H., Kordts, A., Brasch, V., Pfeiffer, M. H., Zervas, M., ... & Kippenberg, T. J. (2016). Raman self-frequency shift of dissipative Kerr solitons in an optical microresonator.Physical review letters, 116(10), 103902

    work page 2016

  63. [63]

    F., Yang, K

    Yi, X., Yang, Q. F., Yang, K. Y., & Vahala, K. (2016). Theory and measurement of the soliton self-frequency shift and efficiency in optical microcavities.Optics letters, 41(15), 3419–3422

    work page 2016

  64. [64]

    Hénon, M. (1976). A two-dimensional mapping with a strange attractor.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 50(1), 69–77

    work page 1976

  65. [65]

    K., Brunner, D., & De Rossi, A

    Boikov, I. K., Brunner, D., & De Rossi, A. (2024). Nonlinear integrated optical resonators for optical fibre data recovery.Optics Express, 32(20), 34223–34233

    work page 2024

  66. [66]

    Li, S., Dev, S., Kuehl, S., Jamshidi, K., & Pachnicke, S. (2021). Micro-ring resonator based photonic reservoir computing for PAM equalization.IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 33(18), 978–981

    work page 2021

  67. [67]

    Denis-Le Coarer, F., Sciamanna, M., Katumba, A., Freiberger, M., Dambre, J., Bienstman, P., & Rontani, D. (2018). All-optical reservoir computing on a photonic chip using silicon-based ring resonators.IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 24(6), 1–8

    work page 2018

  68. [68]

    Lugnan, A., Biasi, S., Foradori, A., Bienstman, P., & Pavesi, L. (2025). Reservoir Computing with All- Optical Non-Fading Memory in a Self-Pulsing Microresonator Network.Advanced Optical Materials, 13(11), 2403133

    work page 2025

  69. [69]

    R., & Pavesi, L

    Donati, G., Argyris, A., Mancinelli, M., Mirasso, C. R., & Pavesi, L. (2024). Time delay reservoir computing with a silicon microring resonator and a fiber-based optical feedback loop.Optics Express, 32(8), 13419–13437

    work page 2024

  70. [70]

    R., Mancinelli, M., Pavesi, L., & Argyris, A

    Donati, G., Mirasso, C. R., Mancinelli, M., Pavesi, L., & Argyris, A. (2021). Microring resonators with external optical feedback for time delay reservoir computing.Optics Express, 30(1), 522–537

    work page 2021

  71. [71]

    K., Okawachi, Y., Zhao, Y., Ji, X., Joshi, C., Lipson, M., & Gaeta, A

    Jang, J. K., Okawachi, Y., Zhao, Y., Ji, X., Joshi, C., Lipson, M., & Gaeta, A. L. (2021). Conversion efficiency of soliton Kerr combs.Optics Letters, 46(15), 3657–3660

    work page 2021

  72. [72]

    X., Wang, H., Wu, L., Leifer, S.,

    Li, J., Bao, C., Ji, Q. X., Wang, H., Wu, L., Leifer, S., ... & Vahala, K. (2022). Efficiency of pulse pumped soliton microcombs.Optica, 9(2), 231–239

    work page 2022

  73. [73]

    Xue, X., Zheng, X., & Zhou, B. (2019). Super-efficient temporal solitons in mutually coupled optical cavities. Nature Photonics, 13(9), 616–622

    work page 2019

  74. [74]

    B., Girardi, M., Ye, Z., Lei, F., Schröder, J., & Torres-Company, V

    Helgason, Ó. B., Girardi, M., Ye, Z., Lei, F., Schröder, J., & Torres-Company, V. (2023). Surpassing the nonlinear conversion efficiency of soliton microcombs.Nature Photonics, 17(11), 992–999

    work page 2023

  75. [75]

    Zhang, X., Wang, C., Cheng, Z., Hu, C., Ji, X., & Su, Y. (2024). Advances in resonator-based Kerr frequency combs with high conversion efficiencies. npjNanophotonics, 1(1), 26

    work page 2024

  76. [76]

    M., Lobanov, V

    Kondratiev, N. M., Lobanov, V. E., Dmitriev, N. Y., Cordette, S. J., & Bilenko, I. A. (2023). Analysis of parameter combinations for optimal soliton microcomb generation efficiency in a simple single-cavity scheme. Physical Review A, 107(6), 063508

    work page 2023

  77. [77]

    C., Bodenmüller, D., Ahmed, S., Wabnitz, S., Modotto, D., & Hansson, T

    Boggio, J. C., Bodenmüller, D., Ahmed, S., Wabnitz, S., Modotto, D., & Hansson, T. (2022). Efficient Kerr soliton comb generation in micro-resonator with interferometric back-coupling.Nature communications, 13(1), 1292

    work page 2022

  78. [78]

    Wabnitz, S. (1993). Suppression of interactions in a phase-locked soliton optical memory.Optics letters, 18(8), 601–603. 20

    work page 1993