pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.23526 · v3 · pith:B4MVK7JMnew · submitted 2026-02-26 · 📡 eess.SY · cs.SY

Training with Hard Constraints: Learning Neural Certificates and Controllers for SDEs

classification 📡 eess.SY cs.SY
keywords certificateguaranteesmethodneuralsdestrainingapproachbound-based
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Due to their expressive power, neural networks (NNs) are promising templates for functional optimization problems, particularly for reach-avoid certificate generation for systems governed by stochastic differential equations (SDEs). However, ensuring hard-constraint satisfaction remains a major challenge. In this work, we propose two constraint-driven training frameworks with guarantees for supermartingale-based neural certificate construction and controller synthesis for SDEs. The first approach enforces certificate inequalities via domain discretization and a bound-based loss, guaranteeing global validity once the loss reaches zero. We show that this method also enables joint NN controller-certificate synthesis with hard guarantees. For high-dimensional systems where discretization becomes prohibitive, we introduce a partition-free, scenario-based training method that provides arbitrarily tight PAC guarantees for certificate constraint satisfaction. Benchmarks demonstrate scalability of the bound-based method up to 5D, outperforming the state of the art, and scalability of the scenario-based approach to at least 10D with high-confidence guarantees.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Stochastic Barrier Certificates in the Presence of Dynamic Obstacles

    cs.RO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Time-varying stochastic barrier certificates capture temporal obstacle dynamics via Bellman optimality to deliver tighter probabilistic safety bounds than prior methods, formulated as convex sum-of-squares programs.